The Results of the Recent Excavations at Domuztepe *

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Results of the Recent Excavations at Domuztepe * THE RESULTS OF THE RECENT EXCAVATIONS AT DOMUZTEPE * by U. BAHADIR ALKIM The citadel of Domuztepe °, which lies in a key position in eas- tern Cilicia at the foot of the Anti-Taurus mountains on the road going up to Cappadocia, is directly opposite the fortress of Karatepe which has a strategic importance equal to that of Domuztepe. It is furthermore on a natural thickly wooded hill on the eastern bank of the Ceyhan River (Pyramus). It was here that the Karatepe Expedition, conducted by Professor Bossert, under the auspices of the Turkish Historical Society, the Turkish Directorate-General of Anti- quities and Museums and Istanbul University, carried out its first investigations in 1947 and further soundings in 1948. From these we have learned that there was a settlement here contemporary with King Asitawa(n)da-s of Karatepe (Asitawandawa), in the eighth century B. C., and also later settlements in the Hellenistic and Roman periods. ~ri our preliminary reports 2 we described our * Lecture delivered to the 22nd International Congress of Orientalists (15th-22nd September 1951, ~stanbul). The present paper was read to the joint session of the Ancient Orient and Ancient Anatolia sections on September 22 nd, 1951. In the limited time available only a summary was possible ; it is republished here with the addition of footnotes, but without other alteration. The architecture, sculptures and small finds will be critically analysed in the author's final report of the soundings at Domuztepe. This is now in course of preparation. The English text of this article was revised by Professor G. E. Bean, to whom the author wishes to express his gratitude. Professor H. Th. Bossert and Dr. Halet Çambel saw Domuztepe from Ka- ratepe in February 1946 when they made the first visit to the ruins of Karatepe (cf. H. Th. Bossert and H. Çambel: Karatepe. A Preliminary Report on a new Hittite Site, Istanbul 1946, p. 12 (=Karatepe I). The discovery of Domuztepe citadcl was made by Prof. Bossert and the author in the Spring of 1947 (cf. H. Th. Bossert and U. Bahad ~ r Al kim : Karatepe, Kadirli and its Environments, Se- cond Preliminary Report, ~stanbul 1947, p. 28 [=Karatepe II]. 2 Cf. Karatepe I, p. 12 and Fig. 21; Karatepe II, pp. 28-29 and Figs. 155, 156, 159, 16o; U. B. Al kim: Les r6u1tats archiologiques des fouilles de Karatepe, Re- EXCAVATIONS AT DOMUZTEPE 239 finds objectively without forming conclusions. But now that the studies and excavations in the autumn of 1949 3 and again of 1950 4 have made possible a more thorough understanding of the archaeologi- cal importance of this site, we shall try to present briefly the results of our investigations. We find that there are four periods of occupation at Domuz- tepe; beginning with the most recent and working backwards, the periods are these : Roman, Hellenistic, The eighth century B. C., The ninth century B. C. I proceed to consider each of these periods in the above order. I. THE ROMAN PERIOD The Roman structures, built in part from the materials left over from previous times, are to be found in an arca of some three square kilometres covering the summit and the slopes on the north, the east and the south. Because of the extensive destruction in mediaeval and modern times we are unable to draw a clear plan from the sur- face remains. However on the summit where we concentrated our efforts we were able to uncover in considerable quantity simple potsherds, a limited number of fragments of terra sigillata and metal vessels, and a silver coin struck in the year 150 B. C. These finds were of the Hellenistic, Iron Age, and Late-Hittite periods, all mixed together. Many of the various basalt hand-mill stones and presses belong to the Roman period. The earthernware pipes bringing water from vue Hittite et Asianique, vol. IX, No. 50 (1948-1949), p. 3; U. B. Alk ~ m : Ex- cavations at Karatepe, Belleten vol. XII (1948), pp. 254-255; U. B. Alk ~ m : Third Season's Work at Karatepe, loc. cit. vol. XIII (1949), p. 373; H. Th. Bossert- U. B. Alk ~ m-H. Çambel and associates : Die Ausgrabungen auf dem Karatepe, Ankara 1950, pp. 64-71 and Figs. 130-155, 157, 159-175 (=Ausgrabungen). U.B. Alk ~ m: Karatepe-Third Campaign, Belleten yol. XIV (1950), pp. 546-549. 3 U. B. Alk ~ m : Karatepe-Fourth Campaign, Belleten vol. XIV (1950), pp. 655- 657:, cf. Anatolian Studies yol. I (1951), p. 9 and Anadolu yol. I (1951), p. 26. 4 U. B. Alk ~ m : The Fifth Season's Work at Karatepe, Belleten vol. XIV (1950), pp. 68o-681; cf. Anatolian Studies yol. I (195~ ), p. lo and Anadolu vol. I (1951), pp. 28-29. 240 U. BAHADIR ALKIM an abundant and perennial spring to the north-east, show the stra- tegic and economic importance of the community during the Roman period on Domuztepe, which even now is covered with olive trees. The architectural style of certain walls of the Domuztepe en- ceinte, although very much damaged, shows that this fortress was reused during the Roman period, though often with additions and alterations. THE HELLENISTIC: PERIOD Up to the present time we have been unable to find any remains of buildings from this period. We judge that during Roman times, Hellenistic buildings were either destroyed or completely rebuilt. However, the abundant potsherds of the fourth, third and second centuries B. C., and the coin of Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175-164 B. C.) which was found in the autumn of 1950 in front of the small entrance with a single lion, are strong evidence that Domuztepe was an important site during the Hellenistic period. On the other hand at least one part of the construction of the enceinte on the south-east indicates that Domuztepe was again a for- tified site during the Hellenistic period. THE EIOHTH CENTURY B.C. A. Architectural remains : In our previous reports we indicated that in the time of Asitawa(n)da-s who built the Karatepe Fortress and had bilingual inscriptions written in hieroglyphic Hittite and in Phoenician, Domuztepe either belonged to the Danunians or was a boundary fortification of a people in friendly relations with them, and that the basalt used in the reliefs of Karatepe, was taken from the quarries of Domuztepe.5 The architectural remains belon- ging to this age were found in the soundings which we made in 950 on the summit itself and to the north of the small entrance with a single lion. ~ ) After the stone blocks fallen from Roman buildings were removed, and the thick trees and bushes were cleared from the area west of the summit, we found at a depth of 20 to 30 centimetres the foundations of a few adjacent rooms erected on virgin rock. Just s Ausgrabungen, pp. 70-71; Belleten yol. XIV (1950), p. 657. tl. B. Alk~m Lev. XXXI Res. ~~ — H, odas~ n~ n kuzey-do~udan görünü~ü. Fig. ~~ — Room H, from the Xorth-East. Res. 2 — Tek arslanl~~ kap~n~n kuzeyindeki sondaj alan~. Fig. 2 — Area of the Sounding to the JV'orth of the gate with a single lion. Belleta~ , C. XVI Lev. XXXII U. B. Alk ~n Res. 3 — Hayat a~ac~~ tasvirli ortostat. Fig. 3 — Orthostat depicting two men and the Tree of Life. Sun-disc above. Belleten, C. XVI U. B. Alktm I,ev. XXXIII Bell ~den, C. XVI Lev. X XXI V U. B. Allan~~ B•lk~~~~n, C. XVI U. B. Ali= Lev. XXXV Res. g — Bir Sakçagözü ortostat~ . Fig. 9 — Orthostat from the east side of the entrance to Sakçagözü Palace. Now in Ankara. Res. 10 — Bir Karatepe ortostat~n~n üzerindeki kanatl~~ güne~~ kursu. Fig. 10 — The sun-disc aboue a demon relief from Karatepe. ~en, C. XVI Lev. XX X VI U. B. Alk~n Belle~en, C. XVI, U. B. Allam Lev. XXXVII Res. 13-14 — Domuztepe ta~ocaklar~na ve ta~~ ç~karma yerlerine ait iki görünü~. Fig. 13-14 — Two views of the quarries on Domuztepe. Bellmen, C. XVI. Lev. XXXVIII U. B. Alk ~n kes. 15-15a — Domuztepe ta~ocaklarma ve ta~~ ç~karma yerlerine ait görünü~ler. Fig. 15-15a — Other views of the guarries on Domuztepe. B~lleten, C. XVI. U. B. Alk ~m Lev. XXXIX Res. 16 — Tek arslanl~~ kap~ n~ n önündeki küçük sondaj alan~. Fig. 16 — Results of the sounding in a small area in front of le lion gate. Res. 17 — Ayni sondaj alan~ ndaki A ve B mimarl~ k katlar~. Fig. 17 — Levels A and B in the same sounding. Belleten, C. XVI. Lev. X L U. B. Alk~m Domuztepe'de 1950 Sonbahar~ nda bulunan A kap~~ arslan~~ (D~~~ yüz). l<1:;. 18 Domuztepe, Portal Lion A. found in 1950. Outer side. Res. 19 — A kap~~ arslan ( ~ç yüz). F~g. 19 — Portal Lion A. Inner side. Bellettn, C. XVI. U. B. Allam XLI Res. 20 — Sirkeli'de bulunmu~~ olan kaide. Hâlen Adana Müzesinde. Fig. 20 — Pedestal found at Sirkeli. Now in Adana Museum. By courtesy of Professor J. Garstang. Res. 21 -- Zincirli men~eli kap~~ arslan~. Yük. 1.92 m., gen. 0.87 m. Hâlen Adana Muzesinde. Fig. 21 — Portal lion of archaic appearance from ( Height 1.92, breadth o.87 m. Now in Adana Museum. Belleten, C. XVL JA ~ . \ I, I I Il . B. Allam Res. 22 — Domuztepe. A kap~~ arslan~ n~n pençeleri. Fig. 22 — Domuztepe. Paws of portal lion A. Rs. 23 — Alacahöyük sfenksinin pençeleri. Fig. 23 — Paws of the sphinx at Alacahöyük. Belleten, C.
Recommended publications
  • Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kiyi Kilikya Bölgesi'nin Yeri Ve Önemi
    T.C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ARKEOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI KLASİK ARKEOLOJİ BİLİM DALI ROMA DÖNEMİ DOĞU AKDENİZ DENİZ TİCARETİNDE KIYI KİLİKYA BÖLGESİ’NİN YERİ VE ÖNEMİ AHMET BİLİR DOKTORA TEZİ Danışman YRD. DOÇ. DR. MEHMET TEKOCAK Konya 2014 II T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Bilimsel Etik Sayfası Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Bu tezin proje safhasından sonuçlanmasına kadarki bütün süreçlerde bilimsel etiğe ve akademik kurallara özenle riayet edildiğini, tez içindeki bütün bilgilerin etik davranış ve akademik kurallar çerçevesinde elde edilerek sunulduğunu, ayrıca tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel kurallara uygun olarak atıf yapıldığını bildiririm. Öğrencinin imzası (İmza) III T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Doktora Tezi Kabul Formu Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet Tekocak Tez Danışmanı Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yukarıda adı geçen öğrenci tarafından hazırlanan Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yeri başlıklı bu çalışma ……../……../…….. tarihinde yapılan savunma sınavı sonu- cunda oybirliği/oyçokluğu ile başarılı bulunarak, jürimiz tarafından yüksek lisans tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Ünvanı, Adı Soyadı Danışman ve Üyeler İmza IV Önsöz Geriye dönüp bakınca hep üniversite yılları, kazılar, bölümün koridorları, dostluklar ve hocalar akla geliyor. Bu süre zarfında hissettiğim duygunun bir tarifi olarak aile sıcaklığı kavramını yakıştırabilirim.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Period Is Accepted to Be One of the Most Important
    SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DENİZ ERDEM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doç. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Numan Tuna (METU,SA) Prof. Dr. Asuman Türkmenoğlu (METU, ARME) Prof. Dr. Yılmaz S. Erdal (H.Ü. ANT.) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jan Bertram (METU, SA) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Deniz Erdem Signature : iii ABSTRACT SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY Erdem, Deniz Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assist Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman September 2013, 178 pages This study examines the spatial distribution of small finds within a late Neolithic ritual context at the site of Domuztepe-Kahramanmaraş (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Amuq with Obsidian
    RUNNING AMUQ WITH OBSIDIAN A STUDY ON SUPRA-REGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE NEAR EAST AS SEEN THROUGH OBSIDIAN CONSUMPTION PRACTICES IN THE AMUQ VALLEY (S.E. TURKEY) (CA. 6000 – 2400 B.C.E.) By LAUREN RENNIE, B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Lauren Rennie, 2019 McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2019) Hamilton, Ontario (Anthropology) TITLE: A study on supra-regional socio-economic relationships in the Near East as seen through obsidian consumption practices in the Amuq Valley (S. E. Turkey) (ca. 6000 – 2400 BCE) AUTHOR: Lauren Rennie, B.Sc. (University of Calgary) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Tristan Carter NUMBER OF PAGES: 1-277 ii Lay Abstract This research involved the chemical analysis of 290 artefacts of archaeological obsidian – a naturally occurring substance made of crystallized lava - as a means of studying ancient exchange systems in the Near East. More specifically, this study covers archaeological periods from 6000 B.C.E. (Late Neolithic) to 2400 B.C.E. (Early Bronze Age) in the Amuq Valley region of southern Turkey. These artefacts were procured during excavations under the Oriental Institute Museum (University of Chicago) beginning in the 1930s. All artefacts are exotic to the Amuq Valley from several known obsidian outcrops in Anatolia (Turkey), some over 1000km away. Analysis was conducted using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to match each artefact to its geological origin thereby identifying the range of exotic materials were exchanged across long-distances. The goal of this research was to uncover social and/or economic dynamics of the Amuq Valley through deep-time with regards to the greater obsidian trade network of the Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • ANADOLU ANATOLIA Supplement Series I.4
    I.4 Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi 2019 Arkeoloji Bölümü Dergisi KÜLTÜRLERİN BAĞLANTISI Başlangıcından Roma Dönemi Sonuna Kadar Eski Yakın Doğuda Ticaret ve Bölgelerarası İlişkiler Ek Dizi I.4 ANADOLU - Ek Dizi - Ek ANADOLU Series - Supplement ANATOLIA CONNECTING CULTURES Trade and Interconnections in the Ancient Near East from the Beginning until the End of the Roman Period ANADOLU ANATOLIA Supplement Series I.4 ISSN: 0570-0116 Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi http://basimevi.ankara.edu.tr Vasıf ŞAHOĞLU - Müge ŞEVKETOĞLU - Yiğit H. ERBİL KÜLTÜRLERİN BAĞLANTISI KÜLTÜRLERİN Bölgelerarası İlişkiler ve Ticaret Doğuda Yakın Kadar Eski Sonuna Dönemi Roma Başlangıcından CULTURES CONNECTING Period of the Roman until the End the Beginning East from in the Ancient Near and Interconnections Trade Ankara 2019 Editörler / Editors Füsun Tülek NORTHEASTERN HARBORS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA ON THE CILICIAN COAST AND GULF OF ISSIKOS Füsun Tülek Özet Kilikya, Anadolu’nun güneyinde, Akdeniz kıyısı boyunca denize uzanan yarım ada ve koylar ile bezeli bir bölgedir. Kilikya bölgesinin batısı hemen kıyıdan dik yükselen kayalıklara sahip dağlık ve doğusu ise büyük nehirler ile sulanan geniş ve büyük ovası ile düzlüktür. Bölge, Dağlık Kilikya’da genelde dar bir kıyı şeridine sahipken Ovalık Kilikya’da kıyı şeridi deniz seviyesinde ve geniştir. Bölgenin doğusunda kıyı, kuzey yönünde derin bir yay çizen Issikos / İskenderun Körfezi boyunca uzanır ve Misis Kireç Sırtları eteklerinde yükselerek daralmaya başlar. Bölge kıyı şeridi, kuzeydoğuda Deli Halil Bazalt Formasyonu eteklerinde en daraldığı noktada güneye dönerek Issos / Erzin ovası ile buluşur. Issos / Erzin ovası Akdeniz ve Amanos Dağları arasına sıkışmış dar ve küçük bir ovadır, ama kıyı şeridi alçak ve düzlüktür.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago the Spaces Between the Teeth
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME ONE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME TWO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ xiii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ xvi ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Domuztepe Kazılarının Arkeolojik Sonuçları
    DOMUZTEPE KAZILARININ ARKEOLOJIK SONUÇLAR' * U. BAHADIR ALKIM Do~u Kilikya'da Anti-Toroslar~ n ete~inde ve Kappadokya'ya ç~kan mühim bir yolun kilit noktas~ nda olan Domuztepe kalesi °, yine ayn~~ stratejik ehemmiyeti haiz Karatepe müstahkem mevkiinin tam kar~~s~ nda ve Ceyhan nehrinin do~u yakas~ nda kesif ormanl~ k tabii bir tepe üzerinde bulunmaktad~ r. Burada, Karatepe ekspedis- yonu taraf~ ndan, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlü~ü ve Istanbul Üniversitesi ad~ na birinci (1947) ve üçüncü (1948) mevsimlerde yap~ lm~~~ olan ara~t~ rma ve sondaj- lardan Asitawa(n)das devri Karatepe'si (M. ö. VIII. yüzy~l) ile muas~ r bir iskân~ n ve Hellenistik ve Roma devrine ait muhtelif top- raküstü kal~ nt~lar~ n~ n mevcudiyeti anla~~ lm~~~ ve elde edilen neti- celer kaz~~ ön-raporlar~ m~zda 2 tasviri bir ~ekilde yay~ nlanm~~t~ . * Milletleraras~~ XXII. ~ark~ yatç~lar Kongresine (~stanbul - 22 Eylül 1951) sunulan tebli~. Ayr~lm~~~ olan pek mahdut bir zamana s~~d~ r~labilecek öl- çüde özet halinde kaleme al~n~ p 22.IX.1951 tarihinde Eski ~ark ve Eski Anadolu seksiyonlar~n~n mü~terek oturumunda okunan metnimizin buradaki yay~m~nda herhangi bir de~i~iklik yap~lmam~~, yaln~z altnotlar ilâve edilmi~tir. Domuztepe mimarl~k, heykeltra~l~k eserlerinin ve küçük buluntular~n~n sti- listik ve tahlili etüdleri müellifin haz~ rlamakta oldu~u nihai yay~ nda yap~ lacakt~ r. 1946 ~ubat~ nda Prof. H. Th. Bossert ve Dr. Halet Çambel Karatepe'yi ilk ziyaretleri s~ ras~ nda Domuztepe'yi de kar~~dan, nehrin bat~~ k~y~s~ ndan görmu~- lerdi (kr~.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographiae
    Keilschriftbibliographie. 48 1* BIBLIOGRAPHIAE Keilschriftbibliographie. 48 1986 (Mit Nachträgen aus früheren Jahren) H. KLENGEL ־ K. DELLER Annelies Kammenhuber in dankbarer Verbundenheit zum 19. März 1987 Die Bearbeiter sprechen R. I. Caplice S. J. ihren aufrichtigen Dank dafür aus, daß er zwanzig Folgen hindurch (28-47) die Keilschriftbibliographie in vorbildlicher Weise betreut und ihr einen großen Teil seiner Zeit und Arbeitskraft gewidmet hat. Die vorliegende Folge widmen Redaktion der Orientalia und die Bearbeiter Frau Kollegin Annelies Kammenhuber, München. Sie wünschen damit ihrer Dank- barkeit Ausdruck zu verleihen, daß die Jubilarin Jahrzehnte hindurch dieser Biblio- graphie aus ihrem Fach Hethitologie Datenmaterial zugearbeitet hat. Für Hilfen bei der Zusammenstellung der vorliegenden Folge danken die Bear- beiter ferner Francine Applancourt, Tuğba Asilsoy, Enrico Badali, Kerstin Beck, Angelika Berlejung, Klaus Beyer, Erika Bleibtreu, Martin Blumhofer, Rainer Michael Boehmer, Elisabeth Böllmann, Rykle Borger, Eva-Andrea Braun-Holzinger, Peter Calmeyer, Guillaume Cardascia, Peter Damerow, Muhammad A. Dandamayev, Igor M. Diakonoff, Manfried Dietrich, Ali M. Dinçol, Louis Doucet, Mario F. Fales, Bea- te Fliegel, Benjamin R. Foster, Gabriella Frantz-Szabó, L. Golovleva, A. Kirk Gray- son, Ernie Haerinck, Noémi Háklár-Engel, Clarisse Herrenschmidt, Denyse Homes- Fredericq, Barthel Hrouda, Cengiz Işık, Charles E.Jones, Mechthild Kellermann, Raif Georges Khoury, Géza Komoróczy, Wilfred G. Lambert, Alasdair Livingstone, Abraham Malamat, Florence Malbran-Labat, Jean-Claude Margueron, Manfred Mayrhofer, Alan R. Millard, Gerfried Müller, Khaled Nashef, Mary C. Nebelsick, Henrich Otten, David I. Owen, Simo Parpóla, Herbert P. H. Petschow, Maciej Pop- ko, J. Nicholas Postgate, Johannes Renger, Claudio Saporetti, Carole Solomon, Erika Stengel, Marten Stol, Dietrich Sürenhagen, Christoph Uehlinger, Wilfred H.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Atalan Çayırezmez, N., Hacigüzeller, P. and Kalayci, T. 2021 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey, Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.20 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey Nurdan Atalan Çayırezmez, Piraye Hacıgüzeller and Tuna Kalayci Summary This article provides a brief overview of archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. It introduces the legal framework and the stakeholders involved in conducting archaeological excavations and surveys. The current situation in archiving born-digital and digitised documentation produced during archaeological fieldwork is then introduced. Existing repositories serving as hubs for archaeological and heritage archiving are listed and briefly discussed. Analysis of online publishing practices for archaeological digital resources points to an eclectic landscape that only minimally complies with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. We conclude that guidelines for best practice in metadata and semantic technologies, locally applicable standards (especially controlled vocabularies), technical know-how, and a larger acceptance of open data and scholarship remain much-needed assets for archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. We also conclude that the future promises progress towards more interoperable archaeological digital archives thanks to international training, network and knowledge transfer opportunities (e.g. SEADDA Project). 1. Archaeology in Turkey All immovable and movable cultural assets in the Republic of Turkey are state property whose protection is ensured by the Turkish State under the Constitution (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, 1982, Article 63). Definitions of immovable and movable cultural assets are stipulated in the Law on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Settlement Patterns of the Second Millennium Bc in Cilicia and the Amuq
    HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ A Master’s Thesis by SEVİLAY ZEYNEP ORUÇ Department of Archaeology İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara January 2013 To my family HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by SEVİLAY ZEYNEP ORUÇ In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA January 2013 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. İlknur Özgen Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. Ekin Kozal Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ Oruç, Sevilay Zeynep M.A., Department of Archaeology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates January 2013 This thesis is a study on harbor settlement patterns in the northeastern Mediterranean of the second millennium BC based on geo-archaeological evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • 227000259.Pdf
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Jörg Becker, Ralph Hempelmann, Ellen Rehm (Hg.), Kulturlandschaft Syrien – Zentrum und Peripherie. Festschrift für Jan- Waalke Meyer (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 371), Münster 2010, S. 397–425 Kizzuwatna – Ḥiyawa – Quwe Ein Abriss der Kulturgeschic hte des Ebenen Kilikien Mirko Novák, Tübingen Als junger Student der Vorderasiatischen Archäologie an der Universität des Saarlandes in Saarbrücken war ich von den Lehrveranstaltungen des Jubilars in besonderem Maße beeindruckt, scha ffte er es doch immer wieder, die geo- graphischen und chronologischen Gren zen unseres Faches zu überschreiten und neue methodische Wege aufzuzei gen. Seine vielfältigen Anregungen waren, rückblickend gesehen, in sehr st arkem Maße prägend und haben sich in unserer gemeinsamen Berliner Zeit noch vertieft. Neben dem Interesse an der islamischen Archäologie, die ic h von ihm »geerbt« habe, verdanke ich ihm auch den Blick auf die Levante, mit der er sich seinerzeit im Rahmen seiner Habilitationsschrift zu den Stempe lsiegeln aus dem ‘Amuq-Gebiet in- tensiv beschäftigte. Den nördlichsten Abschnitt der Levante bildet die Tiefebene Kilikiens, die heutige Çukurova, die dem ‘Amuq-Ge biet nordwestlich benachbart ist. Geographisch wie kulturell stellte die se Region immer eine Schnittstelle dar zwischen Nordsyrien, der levantinisch en Küste und Zypern einerseits sowie dem Hochland Anatoliens andererseits, als dessen Teil sie oft fälschlich an- gesehen wird. Im Verlauf ihrer politi schen Geschichte wechselten sich Epo- chen politischer Selbständigkeit von solchen einer Zugehörigkeit zu den großen altorientalischen Großreichen der Hethiter, Mittani, Assyrer und Ba- bylonier ab. Im folgenden wird der Versuch unt ernommen, die wechselvolle Kultur- geschichte des Ebenen Ki likien summarisch darzustellen in der Hoffnung, dass diese Ausführungen das Interesse meines verehrten Lehrers und Freun- des Jan-Waalke Meyer finden mögen.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move in the Late Neolithic
    ON THE MOVE IN THE LATE NEOLITHIC Understanding the nature of exchange and the organisation of transport at the site of Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria) Rizwan Ahmad Cover: Image of nomadic community from the Rajistan province of India (from http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/ Asia/India/West/Rajasthan/Jaisalm er/photo789500.htm) Accessed on 08.04.2014 Rizwan Ahmad Kloosterpoort 161 Leiden, 2312EM Tel: 0044 7854 166 987 Email: [email protected] ON THE MOVE Understanding the nature of exchange and the organisation of transport at the site of Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria) MA Thesis 1044WY Rizwan Ahmad S1420011 Supervisor: Dr O.P. Nieuwenhuyse University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, 16 June 2014 1 2 Table of Contents | Acknowledgments 6 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Presenting the dilemma 10 1.1.2 Methods of transport 11 1.2 Research questions 12 1.3 Issues of chronology 13 1.3.1 Arbitrary boundaries 16 1.4 Tell Sabi Abyad: centre of exchange? 16 1.5 Notes on methodology 17 1.5.1 Obsidian and bitumen 17 1.6 Structure of thesis 18 2 Prehistoric exchange systems: formalism, substantivism and 21 ‘primitive’ economies 2.1 Issues with terminology 23 2.1.1 Trade 23 2.1.2 Exchange 24 2.2 Prehistoric economic systems 25 2.2.1 Formalism 26 2.2.2 Substantivism 28 2.2.3 Gift exchange and alienable versus inalienable goods 39 2.3 Putting it all into context 30 3 Synthesising storage and trade: developments in the Neolithic 31 3.1 Storage, surplus and trade 33 3.1.1 Agents of mobility: portable storage in the Neolithic 35 3.2 Storage in the Natufian 38 3.2.1
    [Show full text]