Running Amuq with Obsidian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Running Amuq with Obsidian RUNNING AMUQ WITH OBSIDIAN A STUDY ON SUPRA-REGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE NEAR EAST AS SEEN THROUGH OBSIDIAN CONSUMPTION PRACTICES IN THE AMUQ VALLEY (S.E. TURKEY) (CA. 6000 – 2400 B.C.E.) By LAUREN RENNIE, B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Lauren Rennie, 2019 McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2019) Hamilton, Ontario (Anthropology) TITLE: A study on supra-regional socio-economic relationships in the Near East as seen through obsidian consumption practices in the Amuq Valley (S. E. Turkey) (ca. 6000 – 2400 BCE) AUTHOR: Lauren Rennie, B.Sc. (University of Calgary) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Tristan Carter NUMBER OF PAGES: 1-277 ii Lay Abstract This research involved the chemical analysis of 290 artefacts of archaeological obsidian – a naturally occurring substance made of crystallized lava - as a means of studying ancient exchange systems in the Near East. More specifically, this study covers archaeological periods from 6000 B.C.E. (Late Neolithic) to 2400 B.C.E. (Early Bronze Age) in the Amuq Valley region of southern Turkey. These artefacts were procured during excavations under the Oriental Institute Museum (University of Chicago) beginning in the 1930s. All artefacts are exotic to the Amuq Valley from several known obsidian outcrops in Anatolia (Turkey), some over 1000km away. Analysis was conducted using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to match each artefact to its geological origin thereby identifying the range of exotic materials were exchanged across long-distances. The goal of this research was to uncover social and/or economic dynamics of the Amuq Valley through deep-time with regards to the greater obsidian trade network of the Near East. iii Abstract Southern Turkey’s Amuq Valley has been described as a point of convergence bridging distant regions within the ancient Near East. Through an in depth techno- typological and chemical characterization study of 290 obsidian artefacts, this research details changes in deep-time patterns of obsidian use from the Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age (6000 BCE – 2400 BCE), arguing that shifting traditions of consumption reflect socio-economic developments both within and beyond the Northern Levant. These artefacts come from the three sites of Tell al- Judaidah, Tell Dhahab and Tell Kurdu, the material excavated during the 1930’s by the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute. Methodologically raw material sourcing was achieved using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (EDXRF) in the well-established McMaster XRF Lab [MAX Lab]. With these artefacts’ raw materials all being exotic to the Amuq Valley, originating from various outcrops in Cappadocia, the Lake Van region and Transcaucasia (Turkey and Armenia), over 1000km away, this study not only offers new insight into how Amuq Valley communities engaged in long-distance relations, but also contributes to a larger, deep-time regional study of obsidian consumption as a proxy for understanding significant shifts in Near Eastern socio-economics, from hunter- gatherers to the earliest states. In turn, this study, by employing an Annales school framework to consider practice over deep time at the local and supra-regional level further contributes to an ‘archaeology of the long-term’. iv Keywords: The Amuq Valley, Near East, obsidian consumption, XRF, chemical characterization, techno-typological analysis, supra-regional connectivity, socio- economic relationships, long distance trade, Northern Levant, deep-time chronology. v Acknowledgements I acknowledge the privilege of conducting this research on the traditional territory shared by the Haudenosaunee confederacy and the Anishinabe nations under the Dish with One Spoon agreement. I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Tristan Carter, and Dr. Aubrey Cannon, plus Kathryn Campeau for their time and dedication. My warm regards also goes out to Dr. Elizabeth Healey for her time and enjoyable conversation. I would also like give special thanks to the Oriental Institute Museum at the University of Chicago and Helen MacDonald for their contribution and generosity. Finally, my ever grateful appreciation goes out to John Silva in the Anthropology Department at McMaster University for his infinite support and to my many friends and family members who saw me through this experience. vi Table of Contents Lay Abstract …………………………………………………………………….iii Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… iv Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………...vi List of Tables ………………………………………………………………….....xi List of Figures ………………………………………………………………….xvi List of Plates …………………………………………………………………..xxiii List of Abbreviations …………………………………………………………xxiv Declaration of Academic Achievement ………………………………….....xxvii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Thesis …………………………………………..1 1.0 Introduction ...…………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2: Background to the Project …………………………………………2 2.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………...…2 2.1 Historical Background to the Amuq Valley as a Region of Archaeological Investigation …………………………………………..….2 2.2 The sample collection………………………………………………….4 2.3 The study sites ……………………………………………………..… 5 2.3.1 Tell al-Judaidah ………………………………….……….….5 2.3.2 Tell Dhahab ……………………………………………….…6 2.3.3 Tell Kurdu …………………………………………………...6 2.4 The Amuq Sequence in detail …………………………………………7 2.4.1 Phase A ……………………………………………………...7 2.4.2 Phase B ……………………………………………………...9 2.4.3 Phase C …………………………………………………...…9 2.4.4 Phase D ………………………………………………….…10 2.4.5 Phase E …………………………………………………..…11 2.4.6 Phase F ……………………………………………………..12 2.4.7 Phase G …………………………………………………….13 2.4.8 Phase H …………………………………………………….14 2.5 Additional notes on the Amuq Valley Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Occupation Sequence ……………………………………………….15 2.6 Chapter 2 Tables and Figures ………………………………………...18 vii Chapter 3: An Overview of X-ray Fluorescence as Application for Obsidian Sourcing …………………………………………………………………………24 3.i Foreword ………………………..…………………………………….24 3.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………….…24 3.1 Part I, Sourcing versus characterization …………………………..…25 3.2 Part II, Obsidian …………………………………………………...…26 3.2.1 What is obsidian? ………………………………………..…27 3.2.2 Obsidian’s mineral composition …………………………...28 3.2.3 Obsidian’s cultural relevance throughout human history .…29 3.2.4 Obsidian’s archaeological significance ……………………30 3.3 Part III, How to characterize obsidian ……………………………..…30 3.3.1 Visual and haptic techniques ………………………………31 3.3.2 Density and refractive index …………………………….…31 3.3.3 Crystalline and mineral structures ……………………….…32 3.3.4 Dating techniques ………………………………………….33 3.3.5 Chemical ………………………………………………...…34 3.4 Part IV, Choosing X-ray Fluorescence ………………………………36 3.4.1 History and development of XRF ………………………….36 3.4.2 A major comparative ………………………………………38 3.5 Part V ………………………………………………………………...39 3.5.1 How XRF works …………………………………………...39 3.6 Part VI, Summary ……………………………………………………42 3.7 Chapter 3 Tables and Figures ………………………………………..44 Chapter 4: Theoretical Temporal Methodology ………………….………..…49 4.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………….49 4.1 The Annales school of history and archaeology ……………………..49 4.2 An adapted methodology ………………………………………….…50 4.3 Braudelian time, repurposed …………………………………………51 4.3.1 The event ………………………………………………..…51 4.3.2 Mid-range history ……………………………………….…53 4.3.3 Deep-time ………………………………………………….56 4.4 Using a multi-scalar time perspective ……………………………….58 4.4.1 From mid-range history to the event ………………………58 4.4.2 From mid-range history to deep-time history ………………60 4.5 Summary and prelude to the discussion …………………………...…62 4.6 Chapter 4 Tables and Figures ……………………………………..…63 Chapter 5: Laboratory Methods and Analyses ………………………………65 5.i Foreword ………..………………………………………………….…65 5.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………….…65 5.1 Organizing the sample collection ……………………………………66 5.2 Sample preparation for EDXRF analysis ……………………………67 5.3 Analytical procedures ……………………………………………..…69 viii 5.4 Critical reflections on data-integrity …………………………………70 5.5 Conclusion ………………………………………………………...…73 5.6 Chapter 5 Tables and Figures ……………………………………...…74 Chapter 6: Sourcing Results from XRF Analysis …………………………….83 6.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………….83 6.1 Part I, Obsidian source description …………………………………..84 6.1.1 Sources from the Cappadocian Region …………………….84 6.1.1.i Göllü Dağ …………………………………………84 6.1.1.ii Acigöl ……………………………………………86 6.1.1.iii Nenezi Dağ ……………………………………...86 6.1.2 Sources from the Lake Van Region ………………………..87 6.1.2.i Bingöl A and Nemrut Dağ ………………………..87 6.1.2.ii Bingöl B ………………………………………….90 6.1.2.iii Meydan Dağ …………………………………….91 6.1.3 Sources from North-East Anatolia …………………………92 6.1.3.i Sarıkamış …………………………………………92 6.1.3.ii Pasinler …………………………………………..92 6.2 Part II, Tell al-Judaidah obsidian source distribution ………………..93 6.2.1 Phase A …………………………………………………….94 6.2.1.i East Göllü Dağ products ………………………….94 6.2.1.ii Nenezi Dağ products ……………………………..95 6.2.1.iii Other source materials …………………………..96 6.2.2 First Mixed Range ………………………………………….96 6.2.3 Phase F ……………………………………………………..97 6.2.4 Phase G …………………………………………………….97 6.2.4.i East Göllü Dağ products ………………………….97 6.2.4.ii Nenezi Dağ products ……………………………..98 6.2.4.iii Other source materials …………………………..98 6.2.5 Phase H …………………………………………………….99 6.2.6 Second Mixed Range ……………………………………..100 6.2.7 Unconfirmed Phase ……………………………………….100 6.2.8 Summary of obsidian source consumption at Tell al- Judaidah ………………………………………………………………………...100 6.3 Part III, Tell Kurdu obsidian
Recommended publications
  • Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kiyi Kilikya Bölgesi'nin Yeri Ve Önemi
    T.C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ARKEOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI KLASİK ARKEOLOJİ BİLİM DALI ROMA DÖNEMİ DOĞU AKDENİZ DENİZ TİCARETİNDE KIYI KİLİKYA BÖLGESİ’NİN YERİ VE ÖNEMİ AHMET BİLİR DOKTORA TEZİ Danışman YRD. DOÇ. DR. MEHMET TEKOCAK Konya 2014 II T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Bilimsel Etik Sayfası Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Bu tezin proje safhasından sonuçlanmasına kadarki bütün süreçlerde bilimsel etiğe ve akademik kurallara özenle riayet edildiğini, tez içindeki bütün bilgilerin etik davranış ve akademik kurallar çerçevesinde elde edilerek sunulduğunu, ayrıca tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel kurallara uygun olarak atıf yapıldığını bildiririm. Öğrencinin imzası (İmza) III T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Doktora Tezi Kabul Formu Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet Tekocak Tez Danışmanı Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yukarıda adı geçen öğrenci tarafından hazırlanan Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yeri başlıklı bu çalışma ……../……../…….. tarihinde yapılan savunma sınavı sonu- cunda oybirliği/oyçokluğu ile başarılı bulunarak, jürimiz tarafından yüksek lisans tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Ünvanı, Adı Soyadı Danışman ve Üyeler İmza IV Önsöz Geriye dönüp bakınca hep üniversite yılları, kazılar, bölümün koridorları, dostluklar ve hocalar akla geliyor. Bu süre zarfında hissettiğim duygunun bir tarifi olarak aile sıcaklığı kavramını yakıştırabilirim.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Period Is Accepted to Be One of the Most Important
    SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DENİZ ERDEM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doç. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Numan Tuna (METU,SA) Prof. Dr. Asuman Türkmenoğlu (METU, ARME) Prof. Dr. Yılmaz S. Erdal (H.Ü. ANT.) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jan Bertram (METU, SA) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Deniz Erdem Signature : iii ABSTRACT SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY Erdem, Deniz Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assist Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman September 2013, 178 pages This study examines the spatial distribution of small finds within a late Neolithic ritual context at the site of Domuztepe-Kahramanmaraş (c.
    [Show full text]
  • ANADOLU ANATOLIA Supplement Series I.4
    I.4 Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi 2019 Arkeoloji Bölümü Dergisi KÜLTÜRLERİN BAĞLANTISI Başlangıcından Roma Dönemi Sonuna Kadar Eski Yakın Doğuda Ticaret ve Bölgelerarası İlişkiler Ek Dizi I.4 ANADOLU - Ek Dizi - Ek ANADOLU Series - Supplement ANATOLIA CONNECTING CULTURES Trade and Interconnections in the Ancient Near East from the Beginning until the End of the Roman Period ANADOLU ANATOLIA Supplement Series I.4 ISSN: 0570-0116 Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi http://basimevi.ankara.edu.tr Vasıf ŞAHOĞLU - Müge ŞEVKETOĞLU - Yiğit H. ERBİL KÜLTÜRLERİN BAĞLANTISI KÜLTÜRLERİN Bölgelerarası İlişkiler ve Ticaret Doğuda Yakın Kadar Eski Sonuna Dönemi Roma Başlangıcından CULTURES CONNECTING Period of the Roman until the End the Beginning East from in the Ancient Near and Interconnections Trade Ankara 2019 Editörler / Editors Füsun Tülek NORTHEASTERN HARBORS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA ON THE CILICIAN COAST AND GULF OF ISSIKOS Füsun Tülek Özet Kilikya, Anadolu’nun güneyinde, Akdeniz kıyısı boyunca denize uzanan yarım ada ve koylar ile bezeli bir bölgedir. Kilikya bölgesinin batısı hemen kıyıdan dik yükselen kayalıklara sahip dağlık ve doğusu ise büyük nehirler ile sulanan geniş ve büyük ovası ile düzlüktür. Bölge, Dağlık Kilikya’da genelde dar bir kıyı şeridine sahipken Ovalık Kilikya’da kıyı şeridi deniz seviyesinde ve geniştir. Bölgenin doğusunda kıyı, kuzey yönünde derin bir yay çizen Issikos / İskenderun Körfezi boyunca uzanır ve Misis Kireç Sırtları eteklerinde yükselerek daralmaya başlar. Bölge kıyı şeridi, kuzeydoğuda Deli Halil Bazalt Formasyonu eteklerinde en daraldığı noktada güneye dönerek Issos / Erzin ovası ile buluşur. Issos / Erzin ovası Akdeniz ve Amanos Dağları arasına sıkışmış dar ve küçük bir ovadır, ama kıyı şeridi alçak ve düzlüktür.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago the Spaces Between the Teeth
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME ONE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME TWO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ xiii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ xvi ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Domuztepe Kazılarının Arkeolojik Sonuçları
    DOMUZTEPE KAZILARININ ARKEOLOJIK SONUÇLAR' * U. BAHADIR ALKIM Do~u Kilikya'da Anti-Toroslar~ n ete~inde ve Kappadokya'ya ç~kan mühim bir yolun kilit noktas~ nda olan Domuztepe kalesi °, yine ayn~~ stratejik ehemmiyeti haiz Karatepe müstahkem mevkiinin tam kar~~s~ nda ve Ceyhan nehrinin do~u yakas~ nda kesif ormanl~ k tabii bir tepe üzerinde bulunmaktad~ r. Burada, Karatepe ekspedis- yonu taraf~ ndan, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlü~ü ve Istanbul Üniversitesi ad~ na birinci (1947) ve üçüncü (1948) mevsimlerde yap~ lm~~~ olan ara~t~ rma ve sondaj- lardan Asitawa(n)das devri Karatepe'si (M. ö. VIII. yüzy~l) ile muas~ r bir iskân~ n ve Hellenistik ve Roma devrine ait muhtelif top- raküstü kal~ nt~lar~ n~ n mevcudiyeti anla~~ lm~~~ ve elde edilen neti- celer kaz~~ ön-raporlar~ m~zda 2 tasviri bir ~ekilde yay~ nlanm~~t~ . * Milletleraras~~ XXII. ~ark~ yatç~lar Kongresine (~stanbul - 22 Eylül 1951) sunulan tebli~. Ayr~lm~~~ olan pek mahdut bir zamana s~~d~ r~labilecek öl- çüde özet halinde kaleme al~n~ p 22.IX.1951 tarihinde Eski ~ark ve Eski Anadolu seksiyonlar~n~n mü~terek oturumunda okunan metnimizin buradaki yay~m~nda herhangi bir de~i~iklik yap~lmam~~, yaln~z altnotlar ilâve edilmi~tir. Domuztepe mimarl~k, heykeltra~l~k eserlerinin ve küçük buluntular~n~n sti- listik ve tahlili etüdleri müellifin haz~ rlamakta oldu~u nihai yay~ nda yap~ lacakt~ r. 1946 ~ubat~ nda Prof. H. Th. Bossert ve Dr. Halet Çambel Karatepe'yi ilk ziyaretleri s~ ras~ nda Domuztepe'yi de kar~~dan, nehrin bat~~ k~y~s~ ndan görmu~- lerdi (kr~.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographiae
    Keilschriftbibliographie. 48 1* BIBLIOGRAPHIAE Keilschriftbibliographie. 48 1986 (Mit Nachträgen aus früheren Jahren) H. KLENGEL ־ K. DELLER Annelies Kammenhuber in dankbarer Verbundenheit zum 19. März 1987 Die Bearbeiter sprechen R. I. Caplice S. J. ihren aufrichtigen Dank dafür aus, daß er zwanzig Folgen hindurch (28-47) die Keilschriftbibliographie in vorbildlicher Weise betreut und ihr einen großen Teil seiner Zeit und Arbeitskraft gewidmet hat. Die vorliegende Folge widmen Redaktion der Orientalia und die Bearbeiter Frau Kollegin Annelies Kammenhuber, München. Sie wünschen damit ihrer Dank- barkeit Ausdruck zu verleihen, daß die Jubilarin Jahrzehnte hindurch dieser Biblio- graphie aus ihrem Fach Hethitologie Datenmaterial zugearbeitet hat. Für Hilfen bei der Zusammenstellung der vorliegenden Folge danken die Bear- beiter ferner Francine Applancourt, Tuğba Asilsoy, Enrico Badali, Kerstin Beck, Angelika Berlejung, Klaus Beyer, Erika Bleibtreu, Martin Blumhofer, Rainer Michael Boehmer, Elisabeth Böllmann, Rykle Borger, Eva-Andrea Braun-Holzinger, Peter Calmeyer, Guillaume Cardascia, Peter Damerow, Muhammad A. Dandamayev, Igor M. Diakonoff, Manfried Dietrich, Ali M. Dinçol, Louis Doucet, Mario F. Fales, Bea- te Fliegel, Benjamin R. Foster, Gabriella Frantz-Szabó, L. Golovleva, A. Kirk Gray- son, Ernie Haerinck, Noémi Háklár-Engel, Clarisse Herrenschmidt, Denyse Homes- Fredericq, Barthel Hrouda, Cengiz Işık, Charles E.Jones, Mechthild Kellermann, Raif Georges Khoury, Géza Komoróczy, Wilfred G. Lambert, Alasdair Livingstone, Abraham Malamat, Florence Malbran-Labat, Jean-Claude Margueron, Manfred Mayrhofer, Alan R. Millard, Gerfried Müller, Khaled Nashef, Mary C. Nebelsick, Henrich Otten, David I. Owen, Simo Parpóla, Herbert P. H. Petschow, Maciej Pop- ko, J. Nicholas Postgate, Johannes Renger, Claudio Saporetti, Carole Solomon, Erika Stengel, Marten Stol, Dietrich Sürenhagen, Christoph Uehlinger, Wilfred H.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Atalan Çayırezmez, N., Hacigüzeller, P. and Kalayci, T. 2021 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey, Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.20 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey Nurdan Atalan Çayırezmez, Piraye Hacıgüzeller and Tuna Kalayci Summary This article provides a brief overview of archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. It introduces the legal framework and the stakeholders involved in conducting archaeological excavations and surveys. The current situation in archiving born-digital and digitised documentation produced during archaeological fieldwork is then introduced. Existing repositories serving as hubs for archaeological and heritage archiving are listed and briefly discussed. Analysis of online publishing practices for archaeological digital resources points to an eclectic landscape that only minimally complies with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. We conclude that guidelines for best practice in metadata and semantic technologies, locally applicable standards (especially controlled vocabularies), technical know-how, and a larger acceptance of open data and scholarship remain much-needed assets for archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. We also conclude that the future promises progress towards more interoperable archaeological digital archives thanks to international training, network and knowledge transfer opportunities (e.g. SEADDA Project). 1. Archaeology in Turkey All immovable and movable cultural assets in the Republic of Turkey are state property whose protection is ensured by the Turkish State under the Constitution (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, 1982, Article 63). Definitions of immovable and movable cultural assets are stipulated in the Law on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Settlement Patterns of the Second Millennium Bc in Cilicia and the Amuq
    HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ A Master’s Thesis by SEVİLAY ZEYNEP ORUÇ Department of Archaeology İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara January 2013 To my family HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by SEVİLAY ZEYNEP ORUÇ In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA January 2013 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. İlknur Özgen Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Archaeology. --------------------------------- Dr. Ekin Kozal Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT HARBOR SETTLEMENT PATTERNS OF THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BC IN CILICIA AND THE AMUQ Oruç, Sevilay Zeynep M.A., Department of Archaeology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates January 2013 This thesis is a study on harbor settlement patterns in the northeastern Mediterranean of the second millennium BC based on geo-archaeological evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • 227000259.Pdf
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Jörg Becker, Ralph Hempelmann, Ellen Rehm (Hg.), Kulturlandschaft Syrien – Zentrum und Peripherie. Festschrift für Jan- Waalke Meyer (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 371), Münster 2010, S. 397–425 Kizzuwatna – Ḥiyawa – Quwe Ein Abriss der Kulturgeschic hte des Ebenen Kilikien Mirko Novák, Tübingen Als junger Student der Vorderasiatischen Archäologie an der Universität des Saarlandes in Saarbrücken war ich von den Lehrveranstaltungen des Jubilars in besonderem Maße beeindruckt, scha ffte er es doch immer wieder, die geo- graphischen und chronologischen Gren zen unseres Faches zu überschreiten und neue methodische Wege aufzuzei gen. Seine vielfältigen Anregungen waren, rückblickend gesehen, in sehr st arkem Maße prägend und haben sich in unserer gemeinsamen Berliner Zeit noch vertieft. Neben dem Interesse an der islamischen Archäologie, die ic h von ihm »geerbt« habe, verdanke ich ihm auch den Blick auf die Levante, mit der er sich seinerzeit im Rahmen seiner Habilitationsschrift zu den Stempe lsiegeln aus dem ‘Amuq-Gebiet in- tensiv beschäftigte. Den nördlichsten Abschnitt der Levante bildet die Tiefebene Kilikiens, die heutige Çukurova, die dem ‘Amuq-Ge biet nordwestlich benachbart ist. Geographisch wie kulturell stellte die se Region immer eine Schnittstelle dar zwischen Nordsyrien, der levantinisch en Küste und Zypern einerseits sowie dem Hochland Anatoliens andererseits, als dessen Teil sie oft fälschlich an- gesehen wird. Im Verlauf ihrer politi schen Geschichte wechselten sich Epo- chen politischer Selbständigkeit von solchen einer Zugehörigkeit zu den großen altorientalischen Großreichen der Hethiter, Mittani, Assyrer und Ba- bylonier ab. Im folgenden wird der Versuch unt ernommen, die wechselvolle Kultur- geschichte des Ebenen Ki likien summarisch darzustellen in der Hoffnung, dass diese Ausführungen das Interesse meines verehrten Lehrers und Freun- des Jan-Waalke Meyer finden mögen.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move in the Late Neolithic
    ON THE MOVE IN THE LATE NEOLITHIC Understanding the nature of exchange and the organisation of transport at the site of Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria) Rizwan Ahmad Cover: Image of nomadic community from the Rajistan province of India (from http://www.trekearth.com/gallery/ Asia/India/West/Rajasthan/Jaisalm er/photo789500.htm) Accessed on 08.04.2014 Rizwan Ahmad Kloosterpoort 161 Leiden, 2312EM Tel: 0044 7854 166 987 Email: [email protected] ON THE MOVE Understanding the nature of exchange and the organisation of transport at the site of Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria) MA Thesis 1044WY Rizwan Ahmad S1420011 Supervisor: Dr O.P. Nieuwenhuyse University of Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, 16 June 2014 1 2 Table of Contents | Acknowledgments 6 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Presenting the dilemma 10 1.1.2 Methods of transport 11 1.2 Research questions 12 1.3 Issues of chronology 13 1.3.1 Arbitrary boundaries 16 1.4 Tell Sabi Abyad: centre of exchange? 16 1.5 Notes on methodology 17 1.5.1 Obsidian and bitumen 17 1.6 Structure of thesis 18 2 Prehistoric exchange systems: formalism, substantivism and 21 ‘primitive’ economies 2.1 Issues with terminology 23 2.1.1 Trade 23 2.1.2 Exchange 24 2.2 Prehistoric economic systems 25 2.2.1 Formalism 26 2.2.2 Substantivism 28 2.2.3 Gift exchange and alienable versus inalienable goods 39 2.3 Putting it all into context 30 3 Synthesising storage and trade: developments in the Neolithic 31 3.1 Storage, surplus and trade 33 3.1.1 Agents of mobility: portable storage in the Neolithic 35 3.2 Storage in the Natufian 38 3.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodation 13 Adamkayalar 197 Adana 212 Akkale
    255 INDEX Accommodation 13 Atatürk 153, 242 Adamkayalar 197 Attalus II of Pergamon 121, 126 Adana 212 Ayaş 197 Akkale 202 Ayas 216 Akyaka 35 Ayatekla 187 Al Massisa (see Misis) Aydıncık 182 Al Mina 250 Bagras castle 239 Alahan 189 Balboura 60 Alanya 167ff Barbarossa, Frederick, death of 185 Alarahan 166 Bean, George 23, 61, 124, 126, 141, Alcetas of Termessus 124 175 Alexander the Great (Battle of Issus) Beaufort, Francis 23, 40, 72, 116, 156, 235 170, 177, 179, 181, 183, 196, 205, Alexandretta (see İskenderun) 206, 207, 218 Altınkaya 138 Bell, Gertrude 24, 202, 225 Anamur headland 178 Black Cilicia 235ff Anavarza 221 Boğsak island 184 Andriake 97 Boyazı 181 Anemurium 179 Bozburun Peninsula 43ff Antakya 241ff Bubon 60 Antalya 126ff Burgaz 38 Anthony the Younger, St 149 Bybassos 44 Antigonus Monophthalmus 241 Cadyanda 57 Antioch (see Antakya) Caretta caretta turtle 46, 49 Antiochia ad Cragum 177 Carter, Robert and Cynthia 86 Antiphellos 84 Castabala 230 Aperlae 85, 86 Caunus 45 Aphrodite of Cnidus 39 Cedreae 36 Apollo and Daphne, myth of 249 Çelebi, Evliya 25, 36, 147, 208 Apollonia 89 Cennet and Cehennem 194 Apollonius of Selge 142 Ceramic Gulf 35 Ariassos 135 Chimaera, the 116 Arif 106 Cibyra 61 Armenians 168, 234; (ancient capital Cilicia 164ff of) 226 Cilician Gates 208 Arneai 100 Cilicians 7 Arslantaş dam 228 Cleopatra 36, 167, 210 Artemidoros of Cnidus 42 Cnidus 38 Arykanda 105 Cnidus Peninsula 37ff Aspendos 150 Corycian Cave 194 256 BLUE GUIDE MEDITERRANEAN TURKEY INDEX 257 Corycus 195 Haimoff, June 49 Köprülü Canyon 163 Mut 189
    [Show full text]