DOCSLIB.ORG

41Th International Symposium of Excavations, Surveys And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
41Th International Symposium of Excavations, Surveys And REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE AND MUSEUMS 41st INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF EXCAVATIONS, SURVEYS AND ARCHAEOMETRY 17-21 JUNE 2019 Congress Centre Dicle University DİYARBAKIR Congress 17 June 2019 18 June 2019 19 June 2019 20 June 2019 21 June 2019 22 June 2019 Centre Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday A Hall Results of Results of Results of Results of Results of Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-16:30 B Hall Results of Results of Results of Results of Results of Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations 11:00-12:00 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-17:15 Results of Results of Surveys Results of Surveys Results of Surveys Excavations Results of Surveys C Hall 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:05 10:00-12:05 Excursion of 09:00-12:35 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 Diyarbakır 14:00-17:35 14:00-16:15 Results of Results of Results of Results of Surveys Archaeometry Archaeometry Results of Surveys D Hall Archaeometry 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09.00-12:05 14:00-17:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 Results of Results of Results of Results of Surveys Archaeometry Archaeometry Archaeometry 09:00-12:05 E Hall 09:00-12:45 10:00-12:00 10:00-12:00 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-16:10 17 JUNE 2019 MONDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS OF EXCAVATIONS B HALL 10.00 OPENING CEREMONY CHAIRPERSON: Eşref ABAY 11.00-11.15 Körtik Tepe Final Report 2018 Vecihi ÖZKAYA 11.20-11.35 2019 The Year of Göbeklitepe - Emergence of Neolithic in Southeast Anatolia Necmi KARUL 11.40-11.55 2018 Excavations at Çayönü Tepesi -Diyarbakır Aslı ER İM ÖZDO ĞAN 11.55-12.00 Discussion 12.00-14.00 INTERVAL CHAIRPERSON: Özlem ÇEV İK 14.00-14.15 Göbekli Tepe 2018 Lee CLARE 14.20-14.35 Excavation at Harbetsuvan Tepesi in 2018 Bahattin ÇEL İK 14.40-14.55 Boncuklu and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük Douglas BAIRD 15.00-15.15 Çatalhöyük 2018 Çiler Ç İLİNG İRO ĞLU ÜNLÜSOY 15.15-15.25 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Çiler Ç İLİNG İRO ĞLU ÜNLÜSOY 15.25-15.40 Ulucak Excavations 2018 Özlem ÇEV İK 15.45-16.00 İzmir-The Ye şilova Höyük Excavations in 2018 Zafer DER İN 16.05-16.20 Excavations and Restoration Work at Hacılar Büyük Höyük - 2018 Gülsün UMURTAK 16.25-16.40 The 2018 Excavations at Beycesultan Eşref ABAY 16.40-16.50 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Gülsün UMURTAK 16.50-17.05 Güvercinkası Excavations (1996-2018); General Overview Pınar ÇAYLI 17.10-17.25 Aşıklı Höyük, 2018 Mihriban ÖZBA ŞARAN 17.30-17.45 Aksaray Museum Balıklı Excavations – A New Early Sedentary Community in Cappadocia Güne ş DURU 17.50-18.05 The First Preliminary Report on the 2018 Excavations of Domuztepe 2018 Halil TEK İN 18.05-18.15 Discussion 17 JUNE 2019 MONDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS OF EXCAVATIONS A HALL CHAIRPERSON: İsmail ÖZER 11.00-11.15 Pa şalar Excavation 2018 Berna ALPAGUT 11.20-11.35 2018 Üça ğızlı Excavation Erksin GÜLEÇ 11.40-12.00 2018 Çorakyerler Vertebrte Fossil Excavation Ayla SEV İM EROL 12.00-12.10 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Erksin GÜLEÇ 12.10-12.25 İnkaya Excavation, 2018 İsmail ÖZER 12.30-12.45 Direkli Cave Excavations, 2018: Buildings Remains and Spiritual Objects in Epi-paleolithic Period Cevdet Merih EREK 12.50-13.05 Keçe Cave Excavations, 2018 İrfan Deniz YAMAN 13.05-14.00 INTERVAL CHAIRPERSON: Metin KARTAL 14.00-14.15 Kayseri Yamula Dam Fossil Localities Salvage Excavation 2018 Özge KAHYA 14.20-14.35 Sofular Excavation Okşan BA ŞOĞLU 14.40-14.55 Yeniyaylacık Excavation-2018 Cesur PEHLEVAN 15.00-15.15 Kayseri/Barsama Fossil Localities Salvage Excavation 2018 Ömer DA Ğ 15.15-15.25 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Ok şan BA ŞOĞLU 15.25-15.40 Kurutlu Excavation 2018 Ahmet Cem ERKMAN 15.45-16.00 Prehistoric Excavation of Gürgürbaba Hill İsmail BAYKARA 16.05-16.20 A New Epi-palaeolithic Settlement in Southwestern Anatolia: Kızılin 2018 Metin KARTAL 16.25-16.40 Karain Excavations-2018 Harun TA ŞKIRAN 16.40-16.50 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Harun TA ŞKIRAN 16.50-17.05 2018 Excavation Work and Research at Kanlıta ş Höyük Ali Umut TÜRKCAN 17.10-17.25 Excavations at Aktopraklık, 2018 Necmi KARUL 17.30-17.45 2018 Excavations at Gökçeada U ğurlu/Zeytinlik Burçin ERDO ĞU 17.50-18.05 Kırklareli Mound 2018 Season Eylem ÖZDO ĞAN 18.05-18.15 Discussion 17 JUNE 2019 MONDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS OF SURVEYS C HALL CHAIRPERSON: F. Arzu DEM İREL 11.00-11.15 Investigation of the Vertebrate Fossil Deposits of Kayseri and Kırıkkale Yarenkür ALKAN 11.20-11.35 Survey of Neogene Period Vertebrates Fossil Deposits of Kır şehir and Yozgat Provinces 2018 Ahmet Cem ERKMAN 11.40-12.00 Survey at Ankara Province in 2018 Mehmet SA ĞIR 12.00-12.10 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Mehmet SA ĞIR 12.10-12.25 Survey on Neogene Terrestrial Sediments of Isparta Province, 2018 Season N. Damla YILMAZ USTA 12.30-12.45 Survey of Neogene and Pleistocene Fossil Localities of Burdur and Afyonkarahisar Provinces-2018 F. Arzu DEM İREL 12.50-13.05 The Surface Prospection for Neogene and Quaternary Fossil Localities of Denizli and Aydın Provinces Ahmet İhsan AYTEK 13.05-14.00 INTERVAL CHAIRPERSON: Bakiye YÜKMEN EDENS 14.00-14.15 Survey of the Neogene and Pleistocene of the Van Province - 2018 İsmail BAYKARA 14.20-14.35 The Pliocene and Pleistocene Survey in Sivas, 2018 Ay şen AÇIKKOL YILDIRIM 14.40-14.55 Paleolithic Survey of Aksaray Province (2018) İrfan Deniz YAMAN 15.00-15.15 Mu ğla and Çanakkale Survey, 2018 İsmail ÖZER 15.15-15.25 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Ay şen AÇIKKOL YILDIRIM 15.25-15.40 “Early Prehistory and Cilicia Basalt Areas Project”” Stage II: Work in 2018 Bakiye YÜKMEN EDENS 15.45-16.00 Systematic Survey Along the Melendiz River and Its Tributaries, Aksaray 2018 Nurcan KAYACAN 16.05-16.20 Results of the 2018 Season of the Konya Regional Archaeological Survey Project Michele MASSA 16.25-16.40 Neolithic and Pre-Neolithic Period Survey of the Central District of Şanlıurfa Province in 2018 Bahattin ÇEL İK 16.40-16.50 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Nurcan KAYACAN 16.50-17.05 Uşak Protohistoric Period Survey Project: 2018 Results Mehmet Ali YILMAZ 17.10-17.25 Prehistoric Survey of Eski şehir and Kütahya Erkan F İDAN 17.30-17.45 Prehistoric Archaeology Survey in Eski şehir-2018 Metin KARTAL 17.50-18.05 İstanbul Survey Project ( İstYA) 2018: Beykoz I Emre GÜLDO ĞAN 18.05-18.15 Discussion 17 JUNE 2019 MONDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS OF ARCHAEOMETRY D HALL CHAIRPERSON: Mehmet SOMEL 14.00-14.15 Horse Archaeogenomics in Central Anatolia Mustafa ÖZKAN 14.20-14.35 Genomic Analysis of Neolithic Anatolian Sheeps Erinç YURTMAN 14.40-14.55 First Insights into Genomic History of A şıklı Höyük People using Ancient DNA Reyhan YAKA 15.00-15.15 Genomic Analyses of Alaca Höyük Human Remains Füsun ÖZER 15.15-15.25 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Füsun ÖZER 15.25-15.40 Genetic History of Anatolian Populations: from Neolithic to the Present Dilek KOPTEK İN 15.45-16.00 The Evolution of Selected Genetic Disease in Anatolia between the Neolithic and Today-Preliminary Results Mehmet ÇET İN 16.05-16.20 Ancient Metyhlation Patterns Before and After Neolithic Fatma Rabia F İDAN 16.25-16.40 Developing a Computational Framework to Fuse Material Culture with Ancient DNA Elif SÜRER 16.40-16.50 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Mehmet ÇET İN 16.50-17.05 Ancient DNA Studies in Turkey Mehmet SOMEL 17.10-17.25 Archaeobotanical Research on Istanbul’s Neolithic and Byzantine Sites Burhan ULA Ş 17.30-17.45 Methods and Technologies Used in Turkey National 1MV AMS Laboratory Turhan DO ĞAN 17.50-18.05 Capacity Calculations of Storage Units with Metric Measurements: Güvercinkayası Example Pınar ÇAYLI 18.05-18.15 Discussion 18 JUNE 2019 TUESDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS OF EXCAVATIONS A HALL CHAIRPERSON: Tayfun YILDIRIM 9.00-9.15 Tepecik-Çiftlik: Archaeological Research in 2018 Yasin Gökhan ÇAKAN 9.20-9.35 Küllüoba Excavation 2018 Murat TÜRKTEK İ 9.40-9.55 2018 Kültepe-Kanesh Excavations Fikri KULAKO ĞLU 09.55-10.05 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Mirko NOVAK 10.05-10.20 The 2018 Campaign at Arslantepe, Malatya: The Excavation of Late Chalcolithic and Early Iron Age Levels Marcella FRANGIPANE 10.25-10.40 The 2018 Field Works at Mersin-Yumuktepe Isabella CANEVA 10.45-11.00 Zincirli Höyük 2018 David SCHLOEN 11.00-11.10 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Fikri KULAKO ĞLU 11.10-11.25 The Swiss-Turkish Excavation at Sirkeli Höyük 2018 Mirko NOVAK 11.30-11.45 Excavations at Acemhöyük, 2018 Season Aliye ÖZTAN 11.50-12.05 2018 Season Work at Çorum/Resulo ğlu Tayfun YILDIRIM 12.05-14.00 INTERVAL CHAIRPERSON: Halime HÜRYILMAZ 14.00-14.15 Land and Underwater Excavations at Liman Tepe, 2018 Hayat ERKANAL 14.20-14.35 Panaztepe Excavations in 2018 Rıza TUNCEL 14.40-14.55 Excavations at Çe şme – Ba ğlararası, 2018 Vasıf ŞAHO ĞLU 15.00-15.15 Excavations at Çine-Tepecik Höyü ğü, 2018 Campaign Sevinç GÜNEL 15.15-15.25 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Sevinç GÜNEL 15.25-15.40 Excavations at Maydos Kilisetepe Höyü ğü 2018 Göksel SAZCI 15.45-16.00 Troy Excavations in 2018 Rüstem ASLAN 16.05-16.20 Excavations at Gökçeada-Yenibademli Höyük 2018 Halime HÜRYILMAZ 16.25-16.40 Excavations at İnönü Cave the 2018 Season Hamza EKMEN 16.40-16.50 Interval CHAIRPERSON: Göksel SAZCI 16.50-17.05 The 2018 Excavations at Alalakh (Tell Atchana) Kutlu Aslıhan YENER 17.10-17.25 Hatay Archaeological Museum, Altınözü Toprakhisar Höyük Rescue Excavations 2018 Murat AKAR 17.30-17.45 Tarsus-Gözlükule Excavation: 2018 Season Aslı ÖZYAR 17.50-18.05 Tell Tayinat Investigations, 2018 Timothy P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Gm-Gf02 Ek-2 Rev No:0 Hotel Address Distances Km Min
    HOTEL ADDRESS DISTANCES KM MIN Limra Hotel Antalya - Limra Hotel 60 50 Sahil cd. No: 11 Kiriş / Kemer-Antalya Limra Hotel - Airport 70 60 Tel: 0090-242-8245300 ( Pbx ) Limra Hotel – Kemer 8 6 Fax: 0090-242-8247778 / 79 e-mail: [email protected] Limra Hotel - Alanya 160 130 http://www.limakhotels.com ROOMS ALLOCATION ROOM TYPES LOCATION QUANTITY Total Rooms / Beds 815 1620 Standard Rooms Main building 218 Main Block Rooms / Beds 255 510 Arycanda 249 Arycanda Rooms / Beds 256 506 Fame garden 125 Fame Garden Rooms / Beds 177 443 Limra Park 130 LIMRA Park 130 260 Jacuzzi Studios Main building 37 (Across the street) Family Suits Fame agrden 52 Junior Suits Arycanda 7 MAIN BLOCK ARYCANDA FAME GARDEN LIMRA PARK ROOMS Sea/Pool Side Sea/Pool Side Garden Side Chair + Table X X X X Balcony / Terrace X X Family Rooms (X) X Sat. TV 34 Channel X X X X TV Music Channel X X X X Carpet/Laminant L L L C Hair Dryer X X X X Safe Box X X X X Mini bar X X X X Direct Tel. (Room) X X X X Direct Tel. (Bath) X X X X Hotel Info Channel X X X X Shower In Bathroom 52 Rooms X Tub In Bathroom X X Family Rooms (X) Jacuzzi In Bathroom 37 Room Central A/C & Heating X X X X RESTAURANTS FUNCTION SUMMER WINTER CAPACITY & BARS Open Buffet Breakfast, X 600 inside Phaselis Restaurant X Lunch & Dinner 600 inside 700 outside Kazan Restaurant Turkish Cuisine - a la carte X X 70 Ponte Vecchio Restaurant Italian Cuisine - a la carte X 90 China Garden Chinese Cuisine - a la carte X 50 BBQ Restaurant Grill Cuisine - a la carte X 90 Sandal Restaurant Fish Cuisine - a la carte X 60 Lykia Snack Turkish Pide & Light Snack X 400 Galata Snack Spaghetti & Pizza X 80 Beach Snack Gozleme & Meatball/Bread X Lykia Bar Pool Bar X 50 Galata Bar Pool Bar X 80 Beach Bar Beach Bar X The Pub Beer Garden / House X X 80 Street Cafe Lower Lobby Bar X 100 Aquarium Bar Lower Lobby Bar X 100 Lobby Lounge Upper Lobby Bar X X 120 Atlantis Bar Upper Lobby Bar X X 80 Sunshine Bar Pool Bar X Disco Disco X X 150 GM-GF02 EK-2 REV NO:0 FACT SHEET 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fieldwork on Threatened Vipers In
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSIRCF REPTILES • VOL15, NO & 4 AMPHIBIANS• DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):1–9 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES The. Chasing Valley Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer of sayi ) inFour Wisconsin: Viper Species and a On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: HighlandA Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................ of Dwarfs: FieldworkRobert W. Henderson on 198 ThreatenedRESEARCH ARTICLES Vipers in Northeastern Turkey . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis1 equestris) in Florida 2 2 ˙ 3 1 Konrad ............................................. Mebert , BayramBrian J. Camposano,Göçmen Kenneth, Mert L. Krysko, Karıs¸ Kevin, Nas¸it M. Enge, I g˘Ellenci ,M. and Donlan, Sylvain and Michael Ursenbacher Granatosky 212 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, CONSERVATION ALERT St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, 4056 Basel, Switzerland ([email protected]) . 2World’sDepartment Mammals of Biology,in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • İkinci Sofistik Dönem: Sofist, Retor Ve Filozofların Dini Görevleri 219
    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 217-239 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201711 İKİNCİ SOFİSTİK DÖNEM: SOFİST, RETOR VE FİLOZOFLARIN DİNİ GÖREVLERİ THE SECOND SOPHISTIC: RELIGIOUS OFFICIALS OF SOPHISTS, RHETORS, AND PHILOSOPHERS ∗ ELİF AKGÜN KAYA Öz: Edebi kaynaklar, epigrafik belgeler ve nümismatik Abstract: Literary sources, epigraphical documents, veriler İkinci Sofistik Dönem’de (MS I-III. yüzyıl) sofist, and numismatic evidence show that the sophists, rhe- retor ve filozofların mensubu oldukları aile ve aldıkları tors, and philosophers that belonged to the most pro- eğitim sonucunda, kamusal yükümlülükleri ait olduk- minent and the wealthiest families had an excellent ları toplumsal sınıf içinde dikkat çekici şekilde başarıyla education and so they officiated successfully many yerine getirdiklerini ve sahip oldukları parayı cömertçe public services and generously spent their money for kentleri için harcadıklarını göstermektedir. Bu kişiler the cities in the Second Sophistic Period (Ist to IIIrd cen- βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, στρατηγός, ἀρχιε- turies AD). They undertook important municipal ma- ρεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, νεωκόρος, νεοποι- gistracies such as βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, ός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανόμος, λογιστής ve τα- στρατηγός, ἀρχιερεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, μίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρ- νεωκόρος, νεοποιός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανό- χος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης μος, λογιστής ve ταμίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, gibi önemli kent görevlerini üstlenmişlerdir. Ayrıca ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρχος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, eyalet düzeyinde ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης ve πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης. Also, it is documented that γαλατάρχης’lik gibi oldukça prestijli kamusal görevleri they took on quite prestigious provincial magistracies üstlendikleri de belgelenmektedir. Bu makalede ise İkin- such as ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης, and γαλα- ci Sofistik Dönem’de sofist, retor ve filozofların kent- τάρχης.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdwatching Tour
    PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments
    Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments Peter Ian Kuniholm 4 Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments Peter Ian Kuniholm INTRODUCTION Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating has been carried out by the author in former Ottoman lands since 1973. The method is, at its sim- plest, to compare the alternately small and large annual growth-rings from trees from a given climate region-in this case as far west as Bosnia and as far east as Erzurum-and to match them so that a unique year-by-year growth profile may be developed. By means of this a precise date determination, accurate even to the year in which the wood was cut, is possible. See Kuniholm (1995) for a fuller discussion of the method; and then see Kuniholm and Striker (1983; 1987) and Kuniholm (1996) for earlier date-lists of Ottoman, post-Byzantine, and Byzantine buildings, including brief notices of dates for a dozen more dated Ottoman buildings, principally in Greece, and additional notices of sampled but not yet dated buildings which are not repeated here. What follows is a compilation, in reverse chronological order, of over fifty dated buildings or sites (more if one counts their constituent parts) from the nineteenth century back to the twelfth (Figure 4.1). Some are major monuments (imperial mosques, sarays, sifayes) clearly deserving of more comprehensive treatment than can be pro- vided here; others (tiirbes, mescits, obscure medreses, and private houses) are little-known, perhaps even unheard of except to special- ists; but all help to form part of the tree-ring sequence which begins with the rings of trees still standing in Turkish forests and extends in an unbroken chain to A.D.360 for oak, A.D.743 for pine, and A.D.1037 for juniper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ardahan Ili Yatirim Destek Ve Tanitim Stratejisi
    T.C. SERHAT KALKINMA AJANSI Ardahan Yatırım Destek Ofisi ARDAHAN İLİ YATIRIM DESTEK VE TANITIM STRATEJİSİ Aralık 2016 1. ANA METİN 1.1. MEVCUT DURUM 1.1.1. İktisadî Sektörlerin Dağılımı İlin, gayri safi katma değer payı açısından iktisadî durumu incelendiğinde TRA2 Bölgesine paralel olarak hizmet, tarım-hayvancılık ve sanayi sektörleri şeklinde sıralandığı görülmektedir. Tablo 1’de görüldüğü üzere bölgemiz gayri safi katma değer olarak hizmet ve sanayi sektöründe Türkiye ortalamasının altında yer alırken tarım sektöründe ise ülke ortalamasının oldukça üzerinde yer almaktadır. Son yıllarda hizmet ve sanayi sektörlerinde artışın olduğu ve tarımdaki payın ise azaldığı görülmektedir. Bunun sebebi olarak köylerden şehirlere doğru göçün devam etmesi, şehirlerde yaşayanların sadece hizmet veya sanayi sektöründe istihdam edilebilmesi, hizmet ve sanayi sektörlerinde gelir akışının daha hızlı olması ve tarım dışı sektörlerin daha fazla mali kayıt altında olması gösterilmektedir. Tablo 1: Gayri Safi Katma Değer Açısından TRA2 Bölgesinin Durumu Hizmet (%) Tarım (%) Sanayi (%) Yıl 2004 2008 2011 2004 2008 2011 2004 2008 2011 TRA2 53,7 62,8 61,2 34,4 24,6 24,8 11,9 12,6 14,0 Türkiye 61,3 62,8 61,2 10,7 8,5 9,0 28,0 27,2 27,5 Kaynak: TÜİK, Gayri Safi Katma Değer Verileri. 1.1.2. İstihdam Durumu Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu verilerine göre TRA2 Bölgesi işsizlik oranı 2015 yılında 3,9’a yükselmiştir. 2015 yılında ülke işsizlik oranının % 10,3 ile oldukça altında kalmış ve işsizliğin en az olduğu bölge olmuştur. TRA2 bölgesinde iş gücüne katılım ve istihdam oranları ise ülke oranlarına göre daha yüksek gerçekleşmiştir. Tablo 2: TRA2 Bölgesi Temel İşgücü Göstergeleri 2015 Bölge İşgücüne Katılma İşsizlik İstihdam Bölge Adı Kodu Oranı (%) Oranı (%) Oranı (%) 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 TR Türkiye 50,5 51,3 9,9 10,3 45,5 46,0 TRA2 Ağrı, Ardahan, Iğdır, Kars 54,8 54,2 3,4 3,9 53,0 52,0 Kaynak: TUİK, İşgücü İstatistikleri 1 TRA2 Bölgesinde iktisadî faaliyetlerin istihdam açısından durumuna bakıldığında sıralamanın tarım-hayvancılık, hizmet ve sanayi şeklinde olduğu görülmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kiyi Kilikya Bölgesi'nin Yeri Ve Önemi
    T.C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ARKEOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI KLASİK ARKEOLOJİ BİLİM DALI ROMA DÖNEMİ DOĞU AKDENİZ DENİZ TİCARETİNDE KIYI KİLİKYA BÖLGESİ’NİN YERİ VE ÖNEMİ AHMET BİLİR DOKTORA TEZİ Danışman YRD. DOÇ. DR. MEHMET TEKOCAK Konya 2014 II T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Bilimsel Etik Sayfası Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Bu tezin proje safhasından sonuçlanmasına kadarki bütün süreçlerde bilimsel etiğe ve akademik kurallara özenle riayet edildiğini, tez içindeki bütün bilgilerin etik davranış ve akademik kurallar çerçevesinde elde edilerek sunulduğunu, ayrıca tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel kurallara uygun olarak atıf yapıldığını bildiririm. Öğrencinin imzası (İmza) III T. C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Doktora Tezi Kabul Formu Adı Soyadı Ahmet Bilir Numarası 104103011001 Ana Bilim / Bilim Dalı Arkeoloji / Klasik Arkeoloji Programı Tezli Yüksek Lisans Doktora Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet Tekocak Tez Danışmanı Öğrencinin Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Tezin Adı Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yukarıda adı geçen öğrenci tarafından hazırlanan Roma Dönemi Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Ticaretinde Kıyı Kilikya Bölgesi’nin Yeri Ve Önemi Yeri başlıklı bu çalışma ……../……../…….. tarihinde yapılan savunma sınavı sonu- cunda oybirliği/oyçokluğu ile başarılı bulunarak, jürimiz tarafından yüksek lisans tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Ünvanı, Adı Soyadı Danışman ve Üyeler İmza IV Önsöz Geriye dönüp bakınca hep üniversite yılları, kazılar, bölümün koridorları, dostluklar ve hocalar akla geliyor. Bu süre zarfında hissettiğim duygunun bir tarifi olarak aile sıcaklığı kavramını yakıştırabilirim.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Period Is Accepted to Be One of the Most Important
    SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DENİZ ERDEM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doç. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Numan Tuna (METU,SA) Prof. Dr. Asuman Türkmenoğlu (METU, ARME) Prof. Dr. Yılmaz S. Erdal (H.Ü. ANT.) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jan Bertram (METU, SA) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Deniz Erdem Signature : iii ABSTRACT SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY Erdem, Deniz Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assist Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman September 2013, 178 pages This study examines the spatial distribution of small finds within a late Neolithic ritual context at the site of Domuztepe-Kahramanmaraş (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Feller-Buncher Performance Using Weibull Distribution
    Article Investigation of Feller-Buncher Performance Using Weibull Distribution Ebru Bilici Forestry Department, Dereli Vocational School, Giresun University, Giresun 28950, Turkey; [email protected] Abstract: With the advancement of technology in forestry, the utilization of advanced machines in forest operations has been increasing in the last decades. Due to their high operating costs, it is crucial to select the right machinery, which is mostly done by using productivity analysis. In this study, a productivity estimation model was developed in order to determine the timber volume cut per unit time for a feller-buncher. The Weibull distribution method was used to develop the productivity model. In the study, the model of the theoretical (estimated) volume distributions obtained with the Weibull probability density function was generated. It was found that the c value was 1.96 and the b value was 0.58 (i.e., b is the scale parameter, and c is the shape parameter). The model indicated that the frequency of the volume data had moved away from 0 as the shape parameter of the Weibull distribution increased. Thus, it was revealed that the shape parameter gives preliminary information about the distribution of the volume frequency. The consistency of the measured timber volume with the estimated timber volume strongly indicated that this approach can be effectively used by decision makers as a key tool to predict the productivity of a feller-buncher used in harvesting operations. Keywords: forest operations; productivity; Weibull distribution; feller-buncher Citation: Bilici, E. Investigation of Feller-Buncher Performance Using 1. Introduction Weibull Distribution. Forests 2021, 12, Innovative management strategies will be necessary in managing forest resources, 284.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Solid Waste Landfill Site Using Geographical Information System (GIS) F
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Geomatics and Civil Engineering Vol:9, No:8, 2015 Selection of Solid Waste Landfill Site Using Geographical Information System (GIS) F. Iscan, C. Yagci perfect project, can also be used in creating landfill areas and Abstract—Rapid population growth, urbanization and alternative solutions can be presented to users. industrialization are known as the most important factors of Developments in computer technologies increased the environment problems. Elimination and management of solid wastes practicability of data storage, data arrangement, data sharing are also within the most important environment problems. One of the and reassessment of data and data analysis. main problems in solid waste management is the selection of the best site for elimination of solid wastes. Lately, Geographical Information As the spatial information system users and dealers increase System (GIS) has been used for easing selection of landfill area. GIS rapidly, technical staff and scientists, who research and has the ability of imitating necessary economic, environmental and produce with conventional techniques, have started to move political limitations. They play an important role for the site selection towards these techniques. of landfill area as a decision support tool. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are the main In this study; map layers will be studied for minimum effect of informatics function of 2000’s. GIS, which saves the data in environmental, social and cultural factors and maximum effect for engineering/economic factors for site selection of landfill areas and geographical coordinate connected relational database using GIS for a decision support mechanism in solid waste landfill management system, has marked an era in associating and areas site selection will be presented in Aksaray/Turkey city, sharing data on earth.
    [Show full text]