DOCSLIB.ORG

Crew Checklist & Quick Reference Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crew Checklist & Quick Reference Handbook CL-126C CREW CHECKLIST & QUICK REFERENCE HANDBOOK Copyright © 2008 by Bombardier Aerospace All rights reserved. Printed in Canada. Subject: Learjet 45 Checklist (U.S. Units) — Change 2 The following summary describes the changes that are incorporated with this change. NORMAL PROCEDURES After Landing/Clearing Relocated “Standby Attitude Indicator — Cage”” step to Shut- Runway down procedure. Even though the gyro is caged, it is still func- tioning and normal taxiing procedures and tarmac irregularities may contribute to excess wear and tear on the unit. Shutdown Added step to cage the standby attitude indicator after the air- craft has been parked. PERFORMANCE DATA TAKEOFF Added shading and the statement that shaded areas are for interpolation only. This statement was erroneously left out on some tables. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES General Changes Updated Tab references. Miscellaneous formatting changes throughout section. No change to content. Cabin/Cockpit Fire, Revised step to use Clearance Delivery Radio to tune COM 1. Smoke or Funes LR GEN FAIL Deleted reference to the 38 amp-hr Ni-Cad battery, as the duration time of 1.0 hr is the same for Lead-Acid or Ni-Cad batteries. Revised step to clarify the conditions that will exist with emer- gency battery until main batteries have been depleted.. Loss of Both Genera- Deleted reference to using RMU 1 to tune COM 1 as RMU 1 is tors and Both Main not available if main battery is not on-line. Batteries Moved RMU 1 from operative to inoperative column. L REV UNSAFE R REV UNSAFE Clarified procedure by adding step to reduce speed to 160 UNL or DEP KIAS or below as required to maintain level flight. During Takeoff Above V1 Speed In flight Added the work “level” to clarify the procedure step. CL-126C Highlights-1 Change 2 ABNORMAL PROCEDURES General Changes Miscellaneous formatting changes throughout section. L CHK IC SW Added amber CAS messages to indicate that there is a mis- R CHK IC SW match between the loaded IC-600 software and the approved LR CHK IC SW configuration software ID file, or that the program enable dis- crete is active. These CAS messages will appear in ground mode, and are inhibited on takeoff. Landing Gear Free Fall Revised procedure to clarify action after GEAR FREEFALL lever step has been initiated. Normal Electrical Added footnotes to Operative/Inoperative Table to clarify what System Failure Land- instruments are operative with main batteries not depleted. ing Main Hydraulic Sys- Separated step “3a” into two separate steps to clarify the ver- tem Failure Landing biage to check that brake accumulator reservoir pressure is adequate before activating the HYD XFLOW switch for flap extension. ADVISORY/STATUS General Changes Miscellaneous formatting changes throughout section. No change to content. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA General Changes Miscellaneous formatting changes throughout section. No change to content. DC Power Distribution Deleted reference to 10 Amp-Hr as it is no longer available. (Dual Generator Regardless of which battery is installed, the duration is 1 hour. Failure) Master EICAS Index Updated Tab references. Added reference to L CHK IC SW, R CHK IC SW, and LR CHK IC SW CAS message. APU Amps High Changed to N/A as it indicates a normal system response for excessive electrical loads being placed on the APU generator. APU FAIL Revised NO GO or MEL RELIEF column to harmonize with DDG and MMEL. Highlights-2 CL-126C Change 2 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Use this List of Effective Pages to determine the current status of the Crew Checklist and Quick Reference Handbook. Pages affected by the current change are indicated by an asterisk (*) immediately preceding the page number. Dates of issue for original and changed pages are: Original ............................................ O ........................................April 1998 Reissue............................................ A .............................. December 1999 Reissue............................................ B .................................. October 2004 Reissue............................................ C .................................. October 2008 Change ............................................1 ....................................... June 2009 Change ............................................2 .....................................March 2010 Page Change Aircraft Affected/Effectivity Code Title ............................................... C All *LOEP-1 thru LOEP-7..................... 2 All *LOEP-8 (Added)............................ 2 All *LOR ............................................... 2 All *TCL-1 ............................................ 2 All i ..................................................... C All ii..................................................... 1 All iii and iv ......................................... C All Normal Procedures N-1 thru N-13................................. C All N-14 .............................................. 1 Aircraft 45-002 & on not modified by SB 45-11-4 N-14.1............................................ 1 Aircraft 45-002 & on modified by SB 45-11-4 N-15............................................... C All *N-16 thru N-18............................... 2 All N-19 and N-20............................... 1 All Performance Data *P-1................................................. 2 All *P-2................................................. 2 D P-2.1 ............................................. 1 E P-2.2.............................................. 1 F P-3................................................. 1 D P-3.1.............................................. 1 E P-3.2.............................................. 1 F P-4................................................. 1 D P-4.1.............................................. 1 E P-4.2.............................................. 1 F P-5................................................. 1 D P-5.1 ............................................. 1 E P-5.2.............................................. 1 F Denotes pages presented in either U.S. or metric units. CL-126C Change 2 LOEP-1 Change 2 Page Change Aircraft Affected/Effectivity Code P-6 ................................................. 1 D *P-6.1 .............................................. 2 E P-6.2 .............................................. 1 F *P-7 ................................................. 2 D *P-7.1 .............................................. 2 E P-7.2 .............................................. 1 F *P-8 ................................................. 2 D *P-8.1 .............................................. 2 E P-8.2 .............................................. 1 F *P-9 ................................................. 2 D *P-9.1 ............................................. 2 E *P-9.2 .............................................. 2 F *P-10 ............................................... 2 D *P-10.1 ............................................ 2 E P-10.2 ............................................ 1 F *P-11................................................ 2 D *P-11.1 ............................................ 2 E *P-11.2............................................. 2 F *P-12 ............................................... 2 D *P-12.1 ............................................ 2 E *P-12.2 ............................................ 2 F *P-13 ............................................... 2 D *P-13.1 ........................................... 2 E *P-13.2 ............................................ 2 F P-14 ............................................... 1 D P-14.1 ............................................ 1 E P-14.2 ............................................ 1 F P-15 ............................................... 1 D *P-15.1 ........................................... 2 E P-15.2 ............................................ 1 F *P-16 ............................................... 2 D *P-16.1 ............................................ 2 E P-16.2 ............................................ 1 F *P-17 ............................................... 2 D *P-17.1 ........................................... 2 E *P-17.2 ............................................ 2 F *P-18 ............................................... 2 D *P-18.1 ............................................ 2 E *P-18.2 ............................................ 2 F *P-19 ............................................... 2 D *P-19.1 ........................................... 2 E *P-19.2 ............................................ 2 F *P-20 ............................................... 2 D *P-20.1 ............................................ 2 E *P-20.2 ............................................ 2 F *P-21 ............................................... 2 D *P-21.1 ........................................... 2 E *P-21.2 ............................................ 2 F Denotes pages presented in either U.S. or metric units. CL-126C Change 2 LOEP-2 Page Change Aircraft Affected/Effectivity Code P-22............................................... 1 All P-23............................................... 1 D and E P-23.2............................................ 1 F P-24............................................... 1 D and E P-24.2............................................ 1 F P-25............................................... 1 D and E P-25.2............................................ 1 F P-26............................................... 1 D and E P-26.2...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aviation Leadership for the Environment
    Aviation Leadership for the Environment Fassi Kafyeke Director Strategic Technology Bombardier Aerospace Co-Chair Canadian Aviation Environment Technology Road Map 2nd UTIAS-MITACS International Workshop on Aviation and Climate Change Toronto, May 27, 2010 Contents Bombardier Aerospace Products Aviation Effects on Global Warming Aviation Position on the Environment The Canadian Aviation Environment Technology Road Map (CAETRM) Bombardier Contribution Short-Term Execution: Bombardier CSeries Mid-Term Execution: GARDN Long-Term Execution: SAGE, FMP Conclusions and Recommendations 2 Fields of activity Aerospace Transportation F10 revenues: $9.4 billion F10 revenues: $10 billion 48% of total revenues 52% of total revenues Backlog: $16.7 billion* Backlog: $27.1 billion* Employees: 28,900* Employees: 33,800* *As at January 31, 2010 3 3 Bombardier’s Business Aircraft portfolio is centred on three families LEARJET FAMILY Learjet 40 XR Learjet 45 XRLearjet 60 XR Learjet 85 CHALLENGER FAMILY Challenger 300Challenger 605 Challenger 850 GLOBAL FAMILY Bombardier Global 5000 Global Express XRS Learjet, Learjet 40, Learjet 45, Learjet 60, Learjet 85, Challenger, Challenger 300, Challenger 605, Challenger 850, Global, Global 5000, Global Express, XR and XRS are trademarks of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. 4 Bombardier’s Commercial Aircraft portfolio is aligned with current market trends Turboprops Q-Series aircraft: 1,034 ordered, Q400 and Q400 NextGen 959 delivered*. CRJ Series: Regional jets 1,695 ordered, 1,587 delivered*. CRJ700 NextGen
    [Show full text]
  • Appendice Au RC PEL 1
    APPENDICES Révision 0 16/09/05 Section 1 RC PEL1 UEMOA APPENDICE 1 AU RC PEL1.A.005 Conditions minimales pour la délivrance d’une licence ou autorisation PEL sur la base d'une licence ou autorisation nationale. (voir PEL1.A.005 (b) (3)) 1. Licences de pilote Une licence de pilote délivrée par un Etat membre de l’UEMOA conformément à sa réglementation nationale peut être remplacée par une licence conforme au RC PEL1 sous réserve de l’application des conditions ci après définies. (a) pour les licences ATPL(A) et CPL(A), remplir, au titre d’un contrôle de compétence, les conditions de prorogation des qualifications de type, de classe ou de la qualification de vol aux instruments si elle est requise, prévues au RC PEL1.F.035, correspondant aux privilèges de la licence détenue ; (b) démontrer auprès de l’Autorité qu’une connaissance satisfaisante du RC-OPS 1 et du RC- PEL1 a été acquise, dans les conditions fixées par l’Autorité ; (c) démontrer une connaissance de l’anglais conformément au RC PEL1.E.030 si les privilèges de la qualification de vol aux instruments sont détenus ; (d) remplir les conditions d’expérience et toutes autres conditions indiquées dans le tableau suivant : Licence nationale Expérience Autres conditions Licences PEL1 Suppression détenue (nombre total obtenues en des conditions d’heures de vol) remplacement et conditions (le cas échéant) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Licence de pilote > à 1500 heures aucune ATPL-A non applicable (a) de ligne avion en tant que CDB sur avions multipilotes Licence de pilote > à 1500 heures aucune
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-And-Yaw Oscillations
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 55 No. 5 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight May 1998 Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-and-yaw Oscillations Fluid leaking from the cabin onto the yaw-damper coupler in the electronic-and-equipment bay affected electronic signals transmitted to the yaw-damper actuator and caused a dutch-roll oscillation. FSF Editorial Staff On Oct. 22, 1995, a Boeing 737-236 Advanced was • “Sufficiently conductive contaminant paths in straight-and-level flight at Flight Level (FL) 200 between certain adjacent pins had affected the (20,000 feet), at an indicated airspeed of 290 knots phase and magnitude of the signals transmitted when roll-and-yaw oscillations began. The flight crew to the yaw-damper actuator, thereby stimulating disengaged the autopilot, autothrottles and yaw a forced dutch-roll mode of the aircraft; damper, but the uncommanded roll-and-yaw oscillations continued. • “The location of the E&E bay — beneath the cabin floor in the area of the aircraft doors, galleys The crew declared an emergency and descended to and toilets — made it vulnerable to fluid ingress 7,000 feet. The oscillations stopped when airspeed was from a variety of sources; [and,] reduced to about 250 knots. After a satisfactory check of the aircraft’s low-speed handling characteristics, the • “The crew actions immediately following the crew returned to London (England) Gatwick Airport onset of the dutch-roll oscillations did not result and landed without further incident. in the disengagement of the malfunctioning yaw- damper system.” The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), in its final report on the incident, identified four causal factors: The B-737, operated by British Airways, was built in 1980 and had accumulated 37,871 hours in service.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.2 $9.00 FEBRUARY 2020 | ainonline.com « Joby Aviation’s S4 eVTOL aircraft took a leap forward in the race to launch commercial service with a January 15 announcement of $590 million in new investment from a group led by Japanese car maker Toyota. Joby says it will have the piloted S4 flying as part of the Uber Air air taxi network in early adopter cities before the end of 2023, but it will surely take far longer to get clearance for autonomous eVTOL operations. (Full story on page 8) People HAI’s new president takes the reins page 14 Safety 2019 was a bad year for Part 91 page 12 Part 135 FAA has stern words for BlackBird page 22 Remote ID NPRM maps out UAS airspace integration plans by Charles Alcock Stakeholders have until March 2 to com- in planned urban air mobility applications. Read Our SPECIAL REPORT ment on proposed rules intended to provide The final rule resulting from NPRM FAA- a framework for integrating unmanned air- 2019-100 is expected to require remote craft systems (UAS) into the U.S. National identification for the majority of UAS, with Airspace System. On New Year’s Eve, the exceptions to be made for some amateur- EFB Hardware Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pub- built UAS, aircraft operated by the U.S. gov- When it comes to electronic flight lished its long-awaited notice of proposed ernment, and UAS weighing less than 0.55 bags, (EFBs), most attention focuses on rulemaking (NPRM) for remote identifica- pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Flight Autopower® for Hawker 800 Series Aircraft
    ® Safe Flight AutoPower For ® Hawker 800 Series Aircraft Chesterfield, MO 636-681-5600 Safe Flight AutoPower® Installed With Experience By West Star Aviation Safe Flight AutoPower® Installed With Experience By West Star Aviation The Mission To deliver the precise management of speed through the control of thrust during all phases of flight to maximize safety, performance and efficiency to the Hawker 800 series of aircraft. The Solution AutoPower® – the automatic throttle system (ATS) from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. In cruise, the Auto Throttle system is continuously Safe Flight pioneered the development of automatic throttle technology which is now monitoring and adjusting the power levers to standard equipment on most large and medium business jets. AutoPower® systems and offset acceleration due to fuel burn. This results components from Safe Flight are installed on more than 9,000 corporate, commercial, in a fuel saving of 3% or more depending on the length of the flight. and military aircraft worldwide. The Benefits From takeoff to touchdown, AutoPower® ATS is designed to provide precise air speed control and engine target settings. The results are significant performance and safety advantages ranging from reduced crew workload and improved situational awareness to greater passenger comfort and increased aircraft value. Operators also report a 3.5 percent increase in range with the system by better controlling speed at cruise and maximizing fuel burn. The AutoPower® system manages engine power by automatically moving the thrust levers, When the flight crew selects a lower altitude on keeping the pilot aware of the adjustments at all times. Overriding the throttles never takes the Proline 21 system, the Auto Throttle system more force than when the system is not engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Grips with A320 Family Performance Retention and Fuel Savings
    Flight Operations Support & Services Customer Services 1, rond-point Maurice Bellonte, BP 33 31707 BLAGNAC Cedex FRANCE Telephone (+33) 5 61 93 33 33 65 getting to grips with A320 Family performance retention and fuel savings Issue 2 - January 2008 Getting to grips with A320 Family Performance Preface Retention and Fuel Saving TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Scope .................................................................................................................... 4 2 Introduction....................................................................................................... 4 3 Industry issues................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Environmental Issues..........................................................................10 4 Initiatives ......................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................12 4.2 Operational Initiatives ........................................................................14 4.2.1 Aircraft operations ..............................................................................14 4.2.2 Cost index ...........................................................................................14 4.2.3 Fuel economy ......................................................................................15 4.2.3.1 Cruise speed.........................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • 11ADOBL04 December 2010
    11ADOBL04 December 2010 Use of rudder on Airbus A300-600/A310 (extracted from former FCOM Bulletin N°15/1 – Subject N°40) Reason for issue On February 8th, 2002, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in cooperation with the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), issued recommendations that aircraft manufacturers re-emphasize the structural certification requirements for the rudder and vertical stabilizer, showing how some maneuvers can result in exceeding design lim- its and even lead to structural failure. The purpose of this Bulletin is to re-emphasize proper operational use of the rudder, highlight certification requirements and rud- der control design characteristics. Yaw control General In flight, yaw control is provided by the rudder, and directional stability is provided by the vertical stabilizer. The rudder and vertical stabilizer are sized to meet the two following objectives: Provide sufficient lateral control of the aircraft during crosswind takeoffs and landings, within the published crosswind limits (refer to FCOM Operating Limitations chapter). Provide positive aircraft control under conditions of engine failure and maximum asymmetric thrust, at any speed above Vmcg (minimum control speed - on ground). The vertical stabilizer and the rudder must be capable of generating sufficient yawing moments to maintain directional control of the aircraft. The rudder deflection, necessary to achieve these yawing moments, and the resulting sideslip angles place significant aerodynamic loads on the rudder and on the vertical stabilizer. Both are designed to sustain loads as prescribed in the JAR/FAR 25 certification requirements which define several lateral loading conditions (maneuver, gust loads and asymmetric loads due to engine failure) leading to the required level of structural strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Subpart a — General Requirements
    SECTION 1 JAR–FCL 1 SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS 1 GENERAL This section contains the Requirements for Flight Crew Licensing. 2 PRESENTATION 2.1 [Each page is identified by the date of issue and the Amendment number under which it is amended or reissued.] 2.2 Sub-headings are italic typeface. 2.3 [New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent amendment is issued.] Amendment 1 1–0–1 01.06.00 JAR–FCL 1 SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.06.00 1–0–2 Amendment 1 SECTION 1 JAR–FCL 1 SUBPART A – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS JAR–FCL 1.001 (continued) JAR–FCL 1.001 Definitions and Multi-pilot aeroplanes: Abbreviations Aeroplanes certificated for operation with a (See IEM FCL 1.001) minimum crew of at least two pilots. Category (of aircraft): Night: Categorisation of aircraft according to specified The period between the end of evening civil basic characteristics, e.g. aeroplane, helicopter, twilight and the beginning of morning civil glider, free balloon. twilight, or such other period between sunset and Conversion (of a licence): sunrise as may be prescribed by the appropriate Authority. The issue of a JAR–FCL licence on the basis of a licence issued by a non-JAA State. Other training devices: Co-pilot: Training aids other than flight simulators, flight “Co-pilot” means a pilot operating other than as training devices or flight and navigation procedures pilot-in-command, an aircraft for which more than trainers which provide means for training where a one pilot is required under the list of types of complete flight deck environment is not necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • B737-800 FTD System Failures
    IOS B737 FTD System Failures 0 Welcome The information contained within this document is believed to be accurate at the time of publication. However, it is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Multi Pilot Simulations (MPS). Multi Pilot Simulations assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document. Boeing, Boeing 737 and Boeing 737NG are registered trademarks of Boeing Company. Airbus, Airbus A320 are registered trademarks of Airbus. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. No rights or claims can be derived from data in this document. WELCOME-1 FSTD: B737 FTD 1 Index Applicability: - Failures marked with a @-sign in the failure title are available on FNPT II/MCC and FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs - Failures without a @-sign are available on FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs only 0 WELCOME .................................................................................................................................. 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 1 DOCUMENT OWNER ....................................................................................................................................... 1 REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INDEX ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog
    Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog Moog Inc. is a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of precision motion control products and systems. Over the past 60 years, we have developed a reputation for delivering innovative solutions for the most challenging motion control applications. As a result, we have become a key supplier to the world’s leading aircraft manufacturers and are positioned on virtually every platform in the marketplace – supplying reliable actuation systems that are highly supportable and add significant value for our customers. A key element of our success has been our customer focus. With Moog, you will find a team of people ready to deliver quality products and support services, all while being flexible and responsive to your needs. Our superior products and services directly reflect the creativity, work ethic and remarkable attention to purpose of our people. We exhibit our commitment by supporting our products throughout the life cycle of a platform, from idea conception and design of original parts, to aftermarket support and 24/7 service. With Moog, you will find a wide spectrum of products, services and support from a dedicated and trustworthy organization. Our culture, coupled with our commitment to our customers, process control and product innovation, will continue to drive the success of our company and yours. 2 Moog Products & Services Moog is the world’s premier supplier of high performance products and support services for commercial, military and business jet aircraft. We offer a complete range of technologies, an extensive heritage in systems integration, and stand behind our products with an unparalleled global customer support network.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Engine Operation and Malfunction
    Airplane Turbofan Engine Operation and Malfunctions Basic Familiarization for Flight Crews Chapter 1 General Principles Introduction the flight crew's understanding and Today's modern airplanes are powered working knowledge of airplane turbine by turbofan engines. These engines are engine operation and malfunctions to the quite reliable, providing years of trouble- topics and depth covered here. Upon free service. However, because of the completing this material, flight crews rarity of turbofan engine malfunctions, should understand that some engine and the limitations of simulating those malfunctions can feel and sound more malfunctions, many flight crews have severe than anything they have ever felt unprepared to diagnose engine experienced; however, the airplane is malfunctions that have occurred. still flyable, and the first priority of the flight crew should remain "fly the The purpose of this text is to provide airplane." straightforward material to give flight crews the basics of airplane engine Propulsion operational theory. This text will also provide pertinent information about malfunctions that may be encountered during the operation of turbofan- powered airplanes, especially those malfunctions that cannot be simulated well and may thus cause confusion. While simulators have greatly improved pilot training, many may not have been programmed to simulate the actual noise, vibration and aerodynamic forces that certain malfunctions cause. In addition, Fig 1 showing balloon with no escape path for it appears that the greater the sensations, the air inside. All forces are balanced. the greater the startle factor, along with greater likelihood the flight crew will try Propulsion is the net force that results to diagnose the problem immediately from unequal pressures.
    [Show full text]