DOCSLIB.ORG

AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Q1 2020 First Results and Main Airlines Fleets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OUR WEBSITE 1 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Q1 2020 first results and main airlines fleets In this quarterly publication (next in October) you will find facts and figures about the civil aviation industry, based on data extracted from our air transport databases. This quarter you will find : • Main airlines Q1 2020 traffic results with 2019/20 comparison • Main airlines current fleets (in April 2020) with planned orders and options • Top 15 airports by passenger traffic, aircrafts movements and cargo for Q1 2020 • Airliners Q1 2020 orders and deliveries with 2019/20 evolution We wish you a pleasant reading ! Every question or suggestion concerning this publication or the databases is welcome at : [email protected] If you have missed the last report please click on the following link : Main airports traffic 2019 Summary 1 - Main Airlines’ traffic Q1 2020 2 - Main Airlines current and planned fleets (April 2020) by region AFRICA & ASIA MIDDLE EAST NORTH EUROPE AMERICA LATIN AMERICA OCEANIA & CARIBBEAN 3 - Main Airport’s traffic Q1 2020 - Top 15 4 - Airliners Orders and Deliveries Q1 2020 5 - Our Databases and Services This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 2 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Main Airlines’ traffic Q1 2020 Q1 results show the first impacts of Covid-19 on air traffic, as most countries started travel restrictions and lockdown in March. The worst numbers were for the carriers based in China, which were grounded in Fe- bruary. In Q2 it was the opposite as firsts numbers indicate a partial recovery of Chinese traffic while most of the world was still in lockdown. 1 RPK Q1 Main Airlines RPK1 - 2019/18 19/18 AIRLINES (millions) 20/19 (%) 2019 (%) AMERICAN AL Group 388,254 4.4 -28.3 UNITED HOLDING 385,211 4.0 -18.6 DELTA AIR LINES Group 382,400 5.5 -16.6 EMIRATES AL 298,000 3.1 -15.1 LUFTHANSA Group 296,500 4.2 -23.9 INTL AL GROUP (IAG) 285,800 5.6 -15.2 CHINA SOUTHERN AIR Hld. 284,900 10.0 -53.2 AIR FRANCE/KLM Group 263,500 3.2 -9.8 AIR CHINA Group 233,178 5.6 -51.4 CHINA EASTERN AL 220,000 8.4 -54.4 ** QATAR AW 172,600 13.4 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN Group 156,250 9.2 -17.9 TURKISH AL/THY 153,200 2.7 -15.1 AIR CANADA Group 151,460 1.9 -17.8 SINGAPORE INT'L Group 149,100 8.0 -23.0 * HAINAN AL Group 138,700 CATHAY PACIFIC Group 134,400 2.9 -45.5 QANTAS Group 127,500 0.6 LATAM Al Group 124,500 4.5 -10.1 ALL NIPPON AW (ANA) 94,659 7.3 -22.2 ALASKA AIR Group 90,200 2.5 -14.4 KOREAN AIR/KAL 83,300 3.9 -29.5 ** ETIHAD AW 81,700 -3.1 JAPAN AL 71,614 1.9 -24.6 SAUDIA 68,573 -6.2 THAI AW INT'L 67,200 -1.5 -21.6 SWISS 53,100 5.6 -20.1 AIR INDIA 52,100 6.8 -10.8 EVA AIR 48,700 0.6 -26.1 ** ASIANA 47,500 1.5 -31.8 ** ETHIOPIAN AL 45,000 5.6 AVIANCA Hold. 44,400 0.7 -24.0 PHILIPPINE AL/PAL 43,300 1.6 CHINA AL 42,500 1.7 -51.4 AEROMEXICO Group 42,470 -2.1 -15.9 ** GARUDA Group 42,400 -12.6 -29.0 ** TAP AIR Portugal 42,000 10.5 SAS 39,400 -1.3 -18.1 AIR NEW ZEALAND 39,400 4.8 -9.8 TUI UK 39,200 0.0 -34.2 Q1 PAX2 (’000) 19/18 AIRLINES (low-cost) 20/19 2019 (%) (%) SOUTHWEST AL 162,700 -0.6 -21.2 RYANAIR 152,400 9.6 -12.3 1 Revenue Passenger-Kilometers EASYJET AL 96,679 9.4 -18.7 2 INDIGO AL 74,700 20.9 2.5 Revenue Passengers carried JETBLUE AW 42,700 1.2 -19.8 * 2018 data ** Estimated data Sources : FRACS Air transport database This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 3 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Main Airlines current and planned fleets (April 2020) by region The number of active commercial aircraft in the 20/19 04/2019 04/2020 % world increased by +1.3% since last year (April Number of 2020/19). A slow-down (+3.9% April 2019/18) ex- 27,047 27,395 1.3% aircrafts * plained by the impact of the B737-MAX crisis and * based on 673 airlines fleets the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. Airbus was still behind Boeing with 36.2% against 39.2% of the world aircraft fleet. But the crisis that impacted Boeing halving its deliveries, combined with a record year for Airbus, helped to reduce the gap (35.2% vs 39.7% in April 2019). This graph does not take into account the acquisi- tion of the Bombardier CRJ program by Mitsubishi Heavy Industry (in June 2020), same for the air- crafts recently grounded or retired due to Covid-19. In the following pages you will find the detailed fleets of the main airlines by region. The airlines classified by region : LATIN AMERICA & ASIA AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST EUROPE CARIBBEAN AIR CHINA EMIRATES AL AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AL AEROMEXICO AIR INDIA ETHIOPIAN AL AIR FRANCE AVIANCA ALL NIPPON AW (ANA) ETIHAD AW AUSTRIAN AL GOL TRANSPORTES AEREOS ASIANA QATAR AW BRITISH AW (BA) LATAM AL BRAZIL CATHAY PACIFIC AW SAUDIA BRUSSELS AL LATAM AL CHILE CHINA AL EASYJET AL CHINA EASTERN AL IBERIA OCEANIA NORTH AMERICA CHINA SOUTHERN AL KLM/ROYAL DUTCH AL EVA AIR AIR NEW ZEALAND LUFTHANSA AIR CANADA HAINAN AL GARUDA RYANAIR ALASKA AL INDIGO AL JETSTAR AW SAS AMERICAN AL JAPAN AL QANTAS AW SWISS DELTA AIR LINES JETSTAR ASIA AW QANTASLINK TAP AIR PORTUGAL JETBLUE AW KOREAN AIR/KAL TUI AIRLINES UK SOUTHWEST AL PHILIPPINE AL/PAL TURKISH AL/THY UNITED AL SINGAPORE INT'L AL THAI AW INT'L Sources : FlightGlobal and FRACS Air transport database This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 4 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST Main airlines fleets 04 / 2020 by region Not many changes in this region compared to last year (April 2020 vs 2019) proportions stayed quite stable. Boeing was still ahead with 45.5% of the market, followed by Airbus with 39.2%. The B737-MAX crisis may give the opportunity to Airbus to reduce the gap, as many B737 orders were canceled and some plotted on the Airbus A320. But with the Covid-19 pandemic most of these orders will be at least postponed of several years. Airline Model In Serv. Ord/Opt. Airline Model In Serv. Ord/Opt. EMIRATES AL Airbus A319-100 1 QATAR AW Airbus A319-100 2 Airbus A350-900 50 Airbus A320-200 30 Airbus A380-800 115 8 Airbus A321-200 4 Boeing 777-200 21 Airbus A321-200N neo 50 Boeing 777-300 134 Airbus A330-200 11 Boeing 777-8/9 115 Airbus A330-300 13 Boeing 787-8/9/10 30 Airbus A350-1000 15 27 Total EMIRATES AL 271 203 Airbus A350-900 39 ETHIOPIAN AL Airbus A350-900 14 10 Airbus A380-800 10 Boeing 737 Max 8 4 25 Boeing 737 Max 5 5 Boeing 737-700 4 Boeing 747-8F 2 Boeing 737-800 17 Boeing 777-200 30 5 Boeing 767-300 6 Boeing 777-300 48 Boeing 777-200 16 Boeing 777-8/9 60 Boeing 777-300 4 Boeing 787-8/9/10 37 23 Boeing 787-8/9/10 26 1 Total QATAR AW 246 170 Bombardier DHC-8-400 20 6 SAUDIA Airbus A318-100 1 Total ETHIOPIAN AL 111 42 Airbus A320-200 49 ETIHAD AW Airbus A320-200 19 Airbus A321-200 15 Airbus A321-200 10 Airbus A321-200N neo 35 Airbus A321-200N neo 26 Airbus A330-200 1 Airbus A330-200 18 Airbus A330-300 32 Airbus A330-300 6 Boeing MD-11F 1 Airbus A340-500 2 Boeing 747-400 10 Airbus A350-1000 4 16 Boeing 747-8F 2 Airbus A380-800 10 Boeing 777-200 23 Boeing 777-200 6 Boeing 777-300 35 Boeing 777-300 19 Boeing 787-9 17 2 Boeing 777-8/9 25 Gulfstream Gulfstream III 2 Boeing 787-8/9/10 38 33 Total SAUDIA 188 37 Total ETIHAD AW 132 100 Sources : FlightGlobal and FRACS Air transport database This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 5 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN ASIA Main airlines fleets 04 / 2020 by region In Asia, Airbus reinforced its leader position, getting close to 50% of the commercial aircraft market (49.6% in April 2020 vs 48.5% in 2019). A large part of Airbus last year production record was deli- vered to airlines of this region. More specifically the A320 family, which actually represent nearly 39% of the commercial aircrafts in Asia. Airline Model In Serv. Ord/Opt. Airline Model In Serv. Ord/Opt. 33 3 AIR CHINA Airbus A319-100 ALL NIPPON AW Airbus A320-200 Airbus A320-200 44 (ANA) Airbus A320-200N neo 11 16 Airbus A320-200N neo 26 7 Airbus A321-200 4 Airbus A321-200 61 Airbus A321-200N neo 11 13 Airbus A321-200N neo 9 1 Airbus A380-800 2 1 Airbus A330-200 30 Boeing 737-700 7 Airbus A330-300 28 2 Boeing 737-800 40 Airbus A350-900 10 20 Boeing 767-300 24 Boeing 737 Max 16 12 Boeing 777-200 20 Boeing 737-700 17 Boeing 777-300 35 Boeing 737-800 105 Boeing 777-8/9 20 Boeing 747-400 3 Boeing 787-10 73 22 Boeing 747-8I 7 Total ALL NIPPON AW (ANA) 230 72 Boeing 777-200 1 ASIANA Airbus A320-200 6 Boeing 777-300ER 28 Airbus A321-100 2 Boeing 787-8/9/10 14 1 Airbus A321-200 15 COMAC ARJ21 700 35 Airbus A321-200N neo 1 23 COMAC C919 5 Airbus A330-300 15 Total AIR INDIA 432 83 Airbus A350-1000 9 AIR INDIA Airbus A319-100 22 Airbus A350-900 11 10 Airbus A320-200 9 Airbus A380-800 6 Airbus A320-200N neo 27 Boeing 747-400 1 Airbus A321-200 20 Boeing 747-400F 4 Boeing 747-400 4 Boeing 747-400SF 7 Boeing 777-200 3 Boeing 767-300 7 Boeing 777-300 15 Boeing 777-200 9 Boeing 787-8/9/10 27 Total ASIANA 84 42 Total AIR INDIA 127 Sources : FlightGlobal and FRACS Air transport database This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 6 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN ASIA Main airlines fleets 04 / 2020 by region Airline Model In Serv.
Recommended publications
  • Aerospace Engine Data

    Aerospace Engine Data

    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
  • Aviation Leadership for the Environment

    Aviation Leadership for the Environment

    Aviation Leadership for the Environment Fassi Kafyeke Director Strategic Technology Bombardier Aerospace Co-Chair Canadian Aviation Environment Technology Road Map 2nd UTIAS-MITACS International Workshop on Aviation and Climate Change Toronto, May 27, 2010 Contents Bombardier Aerospace Products Aviation Effects on Global Warming Aviation Position on the Environment The Canadian Aviation Environment Technology Road Map (CAETRM) Bombardier Contribution Short-Term Execution: Bombardier CSeries Mid-Term Execution: GARDN Long-Term Execution: SAGE, FMP Conclusions and Recommendations 2 Fields of activity Aerospace Transportation F10 revenues: $9.4 billion F10 revenues: $10 billion 48% of total revenues 52% of total revenues Backlog: $16.7 billion* Backlog: $27.1 billion* Employees: 28,900* Employees: 33,800* *As at January 31, 2010 3 3 Bombardier’s Business Aircraft portfolio is centred on three families LEARJET FAMILY Learjet 40 XR Learjet 45 XRLearjet 60 XR Learjet 85 CHALLENGER FAMILY Challenger 300Challenger 605 Challenger 850 GLOBAL FAMILY Bombardier Global 5000 Global Express XRS Learjet, Learjet 40, Learjet 45, Learjet 60, Learjet 85, Challenger, Challenger 300, Challenger 605, Challenger 850, Global, Global 5000, Global Express, XR and XRS are trademarks of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. 4 Bombardier’s Commercial Aircraft portfolio is aligned with current market trends Turboprops Q-Series aircraft: 1,034 ordered, Q400 and Q400 NextGen 959 delivered*. CRJ Series: Regional jets 1,695 ordered, 1,587 delivered*. CRJ700 NextGen
  • Facts & Figures & Figures

    Facts & Figures & Figures

    OCTOBER 2019 FACTS & FIGURES & FIGURES THE STAR ALLIANCE NETWORK RADAR The Star Alliance network was created in 1997 to better meet the needs of the frequent international traveller. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Combined Total of the current Star Alliance member airlines: FOR ALLIANCE EXECUTIVES Total revenue: 179.04 BUSD Revenue Passenger 1,739,41 bn Km: Daily departures: More than Annual Passengers: 762,27 m 19,000 Countries served: 195 Number of employees: 431,500 Airports served: Over 1,300 Fleet: 5,013 Lounges: More than 1,000 MEMBER AIRLINES Aegean Airlines is Greece’s largest airline providing at its inception in 1999 until today, full service, premium quality short and medium haul services. In 2013, AEGEAN acquired Olympic Air and through the synergies obtained, network, fleet and passenger numbers expanded fast. The Group welcomed 14m passengers onboard its flights in 2018. The Company has been honored with the Skytrax World Airline award, as the best European regional airline in 2018. This was the 9th time AEGEAN received the relevant award. Among other distinctions, AEGEAN captured the 5th place, in the world's 20 best airlines list (outside the U.S.) in 2018 Readers' Choice Awards survey of Condé Nast Traveler. In June 2018 AEGEAN signed a Purchase Agreement with Airbus, for the order of up to 42 new generation aircraft of the 1 MAY 2019 FACTS & FIGURES A320neo family and plans to place additional orders with lessors for up to 20 new A/C of the A320neo family. For more information please visit www.aegeanair.com. Total revenue: USD 1.10 bn Revenue Passenger Km: 11.92 m Daily departures: 139 Annual Passengers: 7.19 m Countries served: 44 Number of employees: 2,498 Airports served: 134 Joined Star Alliance: June 2010 Fleet size: 49 Aircraft Types: A321 – 200, A320 – 200, A319 – 200 Hub Airport: Athens Airport bases: Thessaloniki, Heraklion, Rhodes, Kalamata, Chania, Larnaka Current as of: 14 MAY 19 Air Canada is Canada's largest domestic and international airline serving nearly 220 airports on six continents.
  • Appendice Au RC PEL 1

    Appendice Au RC PEL 1

    APPENDICES Révision 0 16/09/05 Section 1 RC PEL1 UEMOA APPENDICE 1 AU RC PEL1.A.005 Conditions minimales pour la délivrance d’une licence ou autorisation PEL sur la base d'une licence ou autorisation nationale. (voir PEL1.A.005 (b) (3)) 1. Licences de pilote Une licence de pilote délivrée par un Etat membre de l’UEMOA conformément à sa réglementation nationale peut être remplacée par une licence conforme au RC PEL1 sous réserve de l’application des conditions ci après définies. (a) pour les licences ATPL(A) et CPL(A), remplir, au titre d’un contrôle de compétence, les conditions de prorogation des qualifications de type, de classe ou de la qualification de vol aux instruments si elle est requise, prévues au RC PEL1.F.035, correspondant aux privilèges de la licence détenue ; (b) démontrer auprès de l’Autorité qu’une connaissance satisfaisante du RC-OPS 1 et du RC- PEL1 a été acquise, dans les conditions fixées par l’Autorité ; (c) démontrer une connaissance de l’anglais conformément au RC PEL1.E.030 si les privilèges de la qualification de vol aux instruments sont détenus ; (d) remplir les conditions d’expérience et toutes autres conditions indiquées dans le tableau suivant : Licence nationale Expérience Autres conditions Licences PEL1 Suppression détenue (nombre total obtenues en des conditions d’heures de vol) remplacement et conditions (le cas échéant) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Licence de pilote > à 1500 heures aucune ATPL-A non applicable (a) de ligne avion en tant que CDB sur avions multipilotes Licence de pilote > à 1500 heures aucune
  • Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock

    Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock

    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.2 $9.00 FEBRUARY 2020 | ainonline.com « Joby Aviation’s S4 eVTOL aircraft took a leap forward in the race to launch commercial service with a January 15 announcement of $590 million in new investment from a group led by Japanese car maker Toyota. Joby says it will have the piloted S4 flying as part of the Uber Air air taxi network in early adopter cities before the end of 2023, but it will surely take far longer to get clearance for autonomous eVTOL operations. (Full story on page 8) People HAI’s new president takes the reins page 14 Safety 2019 was a bad year for Part 91 page 12 Part 135 FAA has stern words for BlackBird page 22 Remote ID NPRM maps out UAS airspace integration plans by Charles Alcock Stakeholders have until March 2 to com- in planned urban air mobility applications. Read Our SPECIAL REPORT ment on proposed rules intended to provide The final rule resulting from NPRM FAA- a framework for integrating unmanned air- 2019-100 is expected to require remote craft systems (UAS) into the U.S. National identification for the majority of UAS, with Airspace System. On New Year’s Eve, the exceptions to be made for some amateur- EFB Hardware Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pub- built UAS, aircraft operated by the U.S. gov- When it comes to electronic flight lished its long-awaited notice of proposed ernment, and UAS weighing less than 0.55 bags, (EFBs), most attention focuses on rulemaking (NPRM) for remote identifica- pounds.
  • Aviation Report V4

    Aviation Report V4

    Efficiency Trends for New Commercial Jet Aircraft 1960 to 2008 ! ii Efficiency Trends for New Commercial Jet Aircraft, 1960 to 2008 The goal of the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) is to dramatically improve the environmental performance and efficiency of personal, public and goods transportation in order to protect and improve public health, the environment, and quality of life. The Council is made up of leading regulators and experts from around the world that participate as individuals based on their experience with air quality and transportation issues. The ICCT promotes best practices and comprehensive solutions to improve vehicle emissions and efficiency, increase fuel quality and sustainability of alternative fuels, reduce pollution from the in-use fleet, and curtail emissions from international goods movement. Authors: Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. Senior Researcher, International Council on Clean Transportation Mazyar Zeinali, Ph.D. Researcher, International Council on Clean Transportation The authors would like to thank our many colleagues around the world that have generously contributed their time and insight in reviewing and commenting on the draft versions of this paper, including Steve Arrowsmith, Theo Rindlisbacher, Chris Eyers, Paul Peeters, Dimitri Simos, Tim Johnson, and Jos Dings. Our gratitude also goes to Paul Madden and Ian Waitz for kindly providing information on previous related studies, and to the members of CAEP WG3, to whom this work was originally submitted. We also thank our ICCT colleagues Drew Kodjak, Fanta Kamakate, Matt Crenson, John German, Andrew Jens, Ray Minjares, Ed Pike, and Kate Blumberg for their review and constructive comments. Generous support for this work was provided by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the ClimateWorks Foundation.
  • The Changing Structure of the Global Large Civil Aircraft Industry and Market: Implications for the Competitiveness of the U.S

    The Changing Structure of the Global Large Civil Aircraft Industry and Market: Implications for the Competitiveness of the U.S

    ABSTRACT On September 23, 1997, at the request of the House Committee on Ways and Means (Committee),1 the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) instituted investigation No. 332-384, The Changing Structure of the Global Large Civil Aircraft Industry and Market: Implications for the Competitiveness of the U.S. Industry, under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the purpose of exploring recent developments in the global large civil aircraft (LCA) industry and market. As requested by the Committee, the Commission’s report on the investigation is similar in scope to the report submitted to the Senate Committee on Finance by the Commission in August 1993, initiated under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (USITC inv. No. 332-332, Global Competitiveness of U.S. Advanced-Technology Manufacturing Industries: Large Civil Aircraft, Publication 2667) and includes the following information: C A description of changes in the structure of the global LCA industry, including the Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger, the restructuring of Airbus Industrie, the emergence of Russian producers, and the possibility of Asian parts suppliers forming consortia to manufacture complete airframes; C A description of developments in the global market for aircraft, including the emergence of regional jet aircraft and proposed jumbo jets, and issues involving Open Skies and free flight; C A description of the implementation and status of the 1992 U.S.-EU Large Civil Aircraft Agreement; C A description of other significant developments that affect the competitiveness of the U.S. LCA industry; and C An analysis of the aforementioned structural changes in the LCA industry and market to assess the impact of these changes on the competitiveness of the U.S.
  • Subpart a — General Requirements

    Subpart a — General Requirements

    SECTION 1 JAR–FCL 1 SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS 1 GENERAL This section contains the Requirements for Flight Crew Licensing. 2 PRESENTATION 2.1 [Each page is identified by the date of issue and the Amendment number under which it is amended or reissued.] 2.2 Sub-headings are italic typeface. 2.3 [New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent amendment is issued.] Amendment 1 1–0–1 01.06.00 JAR–FCL 1 SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.06.00 1–0–2 Amendment 1 SECTION 1 JAR–FCL 1 SUBPART A – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS JAR–FCL 1.001 (continued) JAR–FCL 1.001 Definitions and Multi-pilot aeroplanes: Abbreviations Aeroplanes certificated for operation with a (See IEM FCL 1.001) minimum crew of at least two pilots. Category (of aircraft): Night: Categorisation of aircraft according to specified The period between the end of evening civil basic characteristics, e.g. aeroplane, helicopter, twilight and the beginning of morning civil glider, free balloon. twilight, or such other period between sunset and Conversion (of a licence): sunrise as may be prescribed by the appropriate Authority. The issue of a JAR–FCL licence on the basis of a licence issued by a non-JAA State. Other training devices: Co-pilot: Training aids other than flight simulators, flight “Co-pilot” means a pilot operating other than as training devices or flight and navigation procedures pilot-in-command, an aircraft for which more than trainers which provide means for training where a one pilot is required under the list of types of complete flight deck environment is not necessary.
  • AFRAA Annual Report 2019

    AFRAA Annual Report 2019

    IRLINES ASS A PAGNIES O OM AERI C 20N S C EN 19 E N I A D ES A N A T C IO F I T R I I O R IA C C A I N F O N S E S A S A ANNUAL AFRAA REPORT Amadeus Airline Platform Bringing SIMPLICITY to airlines You can follow us on: AmadeusITGroup amadeus.com/airlineplatform AFRAA Executive Committee (EXC) Members 2019 AIR MAURITIUS (MK) RWANDAIR (WB) PRESIDENT OF AFRAA CHAIRPERSON OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mr. Somas Appavou Ms. Yvonne Makolo Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer CONGO AIRWAYS (8Z) KENYA AIRWAYS (KQ) CAMAIR-CO (QC) Mr. Desire Balazire Esono Mr. Sebastian Mikosz Mr. Louis Roger Njipendi Kouotou 1st Vice Chairman of the EXC 2nd Vice Chairman of the EXC Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ROYAL AIR MAROC (AT) EGYPTAIR (MS) TUNISAIR (TU) Mr. Abdelhamid Addou Capt. Ahmed Adel Mr. Ilyes Mnakbi Chief Executive Officer Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES (ET) AIR ZIMBABWE (UM) AIR NAMIBIA (SW) MAURITANIA AIRLINES (L6) Mr. Tewolde GebreMariam Mr. Joseph Makonise Mr. Xavier Masule Mrs. Amal Mint Maoulod Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ANNUAL REPORT 2019 I Foreword raffic growth in Africa has been consistently increasing since 2011. The demand for air passenger services remained strong in 2018 with a 6.9% year Ton year growth. Those good results were supported by the good global economic environment particularly in the first half of the year. Unlike passenger traffic, air freight demand recorded a very weak performance in 2018 compared to 2017.
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2017

    Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2017

    WHITE PAPER SEPTEMBER 2018 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Tim Johnson, Andrew Murphy, Anastasia Kharina, and Amy Smorodin for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Fuel burn modeling..........................................................................................................................5 2.3 Fuel efficiency calculation ............................................................................................................6
  • Pdsc Meeting Agenda

    Pdsc Meeting Agenda

    PDSC MEETING AGENDA DATE: 11/25/2019 TIME: 3:00-4:30 PM RE: Planning and Development Sub-Committee PDSC Objectives: • Support the development of an updated Strategic Plan and the 2018 Airport Master Plan Update • Provide ongoing support and input on specific plans and proposals for the development of Airport • Provide input on other business development efforts as appropriate. PDSC Agenda Items: 1) Meeting Minutes Review, October 23rd (attached) 2) Development Design and Land Use Standards – 40 min. (attached) a. Core document i. Zone modifications b. Restrooms c. Improvements to existing buildings on leased land i. Lease limitations d. Aesthetics and maintenance of Airport-owned buildings and public areas 3) Air Service - 30 min. (attached) a. Market Demand b. Destination Marketing c. Incentives d. Cheyenne case study 4) Remote Tower - 20 min. a. Current schedule b. Air traffic control continuity c. Funding sources 5) Open Discussion MEETING RECORD Page 1 DATE: 10/23/2019 TIME: 03:30-05:00 PM RE: Planning and Development Sub-Committee Meeting ATTENDEES: Tom Fleming, Jason Licon, Diane Jones, Robert Middleton, James Hays, Aaron Ehle Begin Meeting Record Jason Licon introduced and welcomed new members of the PDSC Mr. James Hays and Robert Middleton. Agenda Item #1: Meeting Minutes Review – September 25th • Tom asked if Diane’s comment was added to August 28th meeting record. Jason verified that it was. • James moved to approve the minutes. The motion, seconded by Tom passed unanimously. Agenda Item #2: Master Plan Feedback from Planning Commissions • Master Plan update was presented at Loveland Planning Commission, Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, and Larimer County Planning Commission meetings.
  • Cabin Crew Training 19 Technical Training 27 Ground Services Training 33 Commercial Training 37 Course Development Unit ( CDU ) 43 Customer Services 47

    Cabin Crew Training 19 Technical Training 27 Ground Services Training 33 Commercial Training 37 Course Development Unit ( CDU ) 43 Customer Services 47

    Inside this catalog EGYPTAIR TRAINING CENTER TRAINING CATALOG Inside this catalog EGYPTAIR Highlights 4 Foreword by egyptair HOLDING COMpaNY Chairman 6 Foreword by VP Training 7 Flight Crew Training 9 Cabin Crew Training 19 Technical Training 27 Ground Services Training 33 Commercial Training 37 Course Development Unit ( CDU ) 43 Customer Services 47 1 2 Dedication EGYPTAIR Holding Company and EGYPTAIR Training Center are Honored to Dedicate This Catalog to His Excellency The Minister of Civil Aviation Air Marchal /Ahmed Shafik 3 EGYPTAIR Highlights Established in May 1932, EGYPTAIR is one of the pioneer airlines in the world, being the seventh air carrier worldwide. The airline builds on its rich and impressive history that matches that of its homeland. Its fleet started with the spartan cruiser aircraft which commenced its first commercial flight in 1933. Afterwards, American and French aircrafts were bought to enhance the fleet. EGYP- TAIR was the first carrier in the Middle East to use jets, as it enhanced its fleet with comet 4-C jets in 1960. It was also the first airline in the Middle East to fly Boeing 707 aircrafts to cope with the growing international traffic and to operate longer routes. Today, as a result of years of continuous investment, EGYPTAIR is operating one of the most modern and young fleets in the industry. 4 Not only does EGYPTAIR invest heavily in purchasing new aircraft, but also in conducting additional training facilities, which is obviously apparent from the amount of development and enhancement that are taking place in EGYPTAIR Training Center. The Training Center is conveniently located at Cairo International Airport in a newly - built center which complies with all the architectural and infrastructure requirements of a modern training facility.