DOCSLIB.ORG

B737-800 FTD System Failures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B737-800 FTD System Failures IOS B737 FTD System Failures 0 Welcome The information contained within this document is believed to be accurate at the time of publication. However, it is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Multi Pilot Simulations (MPS). Multi Pilot Simulations assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document. Boeing, Boeing 737 and Boeing 737NG are registered trademarks of Boeing Company. Airbus, Airbus A320 are registered trademarks of Airbus. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. No rights or claims can be derived from data in this document. WELCOME-1 FSTD: B737 FTD 1 Index Applicability: - Failures marked with a @-sign in the failure title are available on FNPT II/MCC and FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs - Failures without a @-sign are available on FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs only 0 WELCOME .................................................................................................................................. 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 1 DOCUMENT OWNER ....................................................................................................................................... 1 REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INDEX .................................................................................................................................... 1–1 2 AIRPLANE GENERAL................................................................................................................. 2–5 2.1 DOOR OPEN – ANNUNCIATION ONLY @ ............................................................................................. 2–5 2.2 DOOR OPEN – ACTUAL OPEN @ ......................................................................................................... 2–6 3 AIR CONDITIONING AND PRESSURIZATION ............................................................................... 3–1 3.1 RAPID DEPRESSURIZATION @ ............................................................................................................ 3–1 3.2 CABIN LEAK – SLOW / FAST ................................................................................................................ 3–2 3.3 OUTFLOW VALVE FAIL IN POSITION .................................................................................................... 3–3 3.4 AUTO FAIL – ALTN AVAILABLE / ALTN NOT AVAILABLE @ .................................................................... 3–4 3.5 PACK TRIP OFF – RESETTABLE / NOT RESETTABLE @ ............................................................................ 3–5 3.6 BLEED TRIP OFF – RESETTABLE / NOT RESETTABLE @ .......................................................................... 3–6 3.7 WING BODY OVERHEAT ..................................................................................................................... 3–7 3.8 ENGINE BLEED VALVE FAILED CLOSED ................................................................................................. 3–8 3.9 APU BLEED VALVE FAILED CLOSED ...................................................................................................... 3–9 3.10 CABIN ALTITUDE FALSE WARNING ................................................................................................. 3–10 3.11 ISOLATION VALVE FAILED CLOSED .................................................................................................. 3–11 3.12 ZONE TEMP LIGHT – SINGLE / DUAL CHANNEL FAIL @ ..................................................................... 3–12 3.13 EQUIPMENT COOLING FAN FAIL – SUPPLY / EXHAUST ..................................................................... 3–13 4 ANTI-ICE ................................................................................................................................. 4–1 4.1 ENGINE ANTI-ICE VALVE FAIL IN POSITION @ ...................................................................................... 4–1 4.2 WINDOW HEAT OVERHEAT @ ............................................................................................................ 4–2 4.3 PITOT PROBE HEAT FAIL – CAPT / F/O @............................................................................................. 4–3 4.4 TAT PROBE HEAT FAIL @ .................................................................................................................... 4–4 4.5 WING ANTI-ICE VALVE FAIL IN POSITION @ ........................................................................................ 4–5 5 AUTOFLIGHT ........................................................................................................................... 5–1 5.1 FCC FAIL – A / B @ ............................................................................................................................. 5–1 5.2 FLIGHT DIRECTOR FAIL – A / B @ ........................................................................................................ 5–2 5.3 AUTOTHROTTLE COMPUTER FAIL @ ................................................................................................... 5–3 5.4 TO/GA SWITCHES FAIL ....................................................................................................................... 5–4 5.5 AUTOPILOT DISENGAGE SWITCHES FAIL @ ......................................................................................... 5–5 5.6 FLARE MODE FAIL .............................................................................................................................. 5–6 5.7 ALT ACQ + ALT HOLD FAIL @ .............................................................................................................. 5–7 5.8 LOC CAPTURE FAIL ............................................................................................................................. 5–8 REV 1.1 1–1 FSTD: B737 FTD 5.9 G/S CAPTURE FAIL ............................................................................................................................. 5–9 6 COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................. 6–1 6.1 VHF COMM TRANSCEIVER FAIL @ ...................................................................................................... 6–1 7 ELECTRICAL ............................................................................................................................. 7–1 7.1 ENGINE GENERATOR DRIVE LOW OIL PRESSURE @ ............................................................................. 7–1 7.2 ENGINE GENERATOR DRIVE FAIL @ .................................................................................................... 7–2 7.3 ENGINE GENERATOR DISCONNECT @ ................................................................................................. 7–3 7.4 LOSS OF BOTH ENGINE GENERATORS @ ............................................................................................. 7–4 7.5 APU GENERATOR DISCONNECT @ ...................................................................................................... 7–5 7.6 AC TRANSFER BUS FAIL ...................................................................................................................... 7–6 7.7 AC MAIN BUS FAIL ............................................................................................................................. 7–8 7.8 STANDBY POWER AUTO TRANSFER FAIL ............................................................................................. 7–9 7.9 BATTERY DISCHARGED ..................................................................................................................... 7–10 7.10 T/R UNIT FAIL ................................................................................................................................ 7–11 7.11 BATTERY BUS OFF.......................................................................................................................... 7–12 8 ENGINES & APU ...................................................................................................................... 8–1 8.1 ENGINE FLAMEOUT – NO AUTO-RELIGHT @ ........................................................................................ 8–1 8.2 ENGINE FLAMEOUT – AUTO-RELIGHT ................................................................................................. 8–2 8.3 ENGINE SEIZURE @ ............................................................................................................................ 8–3 8.4 ENGINE SEPARATION @ ..................................................................................................................... 8–4 8.5 ENGINE SURGE / STALL – RECOVERABLE / NOT RECOVERABLE @ ......................................................... 8–5 8.6 ENGINE TURBINE BLADE SEPARATION ................................................................................................ 8–6 8.7 ENGINE HOT START @ ....................................................................................................................... 8–7 8.8 ENGINE HUNG START @ ..................................................................................................................... 8–8 8.9 ENGINE WET START @ ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-And-Yaw Oscillations
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 55 No. 5 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight May 1998 Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-and-yaw Oscillations Fluid leaking from the cabin onto the yaw-damper coupler in the electronic-and-equipment bay affected electronic signals transmitted to the yaw-damper actuator and caused a dutch-roll oscillation. FSF Editorial Staff On Oct. 22, 1995, a Boeing 737-236 Advanced was • “Sufficiently conductive contaminant paths in straight-and-level flight at Flight Level (FL) 200 between certain adjacent pins had affected the (20,000 feet), at an indicated airspeed of 290 knots phase and magnitude of the signals transmitted when roll-and-yaw oscillations began. The flight crew to the yaw-damper actuator, thereby stimulating disengaged the autopilot, autothrottles and yaw a forced dutch-roll mode of the aircraft; damper, but the uncommanded roll-and-yaw oscillations continued. • “The location of the E&E bay — beneath the cabin floor in the area of the aircraft doors, galleys The crew declared an emergency and descended to and toilets — made it vulnerable to fluid ingress 7,000 feet. The oscillations stopped when airspeed was from a variety of sources; [and,] reduced to about 250 knots. After a satisfactory check of the aircraft’s low-speed handling characteristics, the • “The crew actions immediately following the crew returned to London (England) Gatwick Airport onset of the dutch-roll oscillations did not result and landed without further incident. in the disengagement of the malfunctioning yaw- damper system.” The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), in its final report on the incident, identified four causal factors: The B-737, operated by British Airways, was built in 1980 and had accumulated 37,871 hours in service.
    [Show full text]
  • 11ADOBL04 December 2010
    11ADOBL04 December 2010 Use of rudder on Airbus A300-600/A310 (extracted from former FCOM Bulletin N°15/1 – Subject N°40) Reason for issue On February 8th, 2002, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in cooperation with the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), issued recommendations that aircraft manufacturers re-emphasize the structural certification requirements for the rudder and vertical stabilizer, showing how some maneuvers can result in exceeding design lim- its and even lead to structural failure. The purpose of this Bulletin is to re-emphasize proper operational use of the rudder, highlight certification requirements and rud- der control design characteristics. Yaw control General In flight, yaw control is provided by the rudder, and directional stability is provided by the vertical stabilizer. The rudder and vertical stabilizer are sized to meet the two following objectives: Provide sufficient lateral control of the aircraft during crosswind takeoffs and landings, within the published crosswind limits (refer to FCOM Operating Limitations chapter). Provide positive aircraft control under conditions of engine failure and maximum asymmetric thrust, at any speed above Vmcg (minimum control speed - on ground). The vertical stabilizer and the rudder must be capable of generating sufficient yawing moments to maintain directional control of the aircraft. The rudder deflection, necessary to achieve these yawing moments, and the resulting sideslip angles place significant aerodynamic loads on the rudder and on the vertical stabilizer. Both are designed to sustain loads as prescribed in the JAR/FAR 25 certification requirements which define several lateral loading conditions (maneuver, gust loads and asymmetric loads due to engine failure) leading to the required level of structural strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog
    Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog Moog Inc. is a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of precision motion control products and systems. Over the past 60 years, we have developed a reputation for delivering innovative solutions for the most challenging motion control applications. As a result, we have become a key supplier to the world’s leading aircraft manufacturers and are positioned on virtually every platform in the marketplace – supplying reliable actuation systems that are highly supportable and add significant value for our customers. A key element of our success has been our customer focus. With Moog, you will find a team of people ready to deliver quality products and support services, all while being flexible and responsive to your needs. Our superior products and services directly reflect the creativity, work ethic and remarkable attention to purpose of our people. We exhibit our commitment by supporting our products throughout the life cycle of a platform, from idea conception and design of original parts, to aftermarket support and 24/7 service. With Moog, you will find a wide spectrum of products, services and support from a dedicated and trustworthy organization. Our culture, coupled with our commitment to our customers, process control and product innovation, will continue to drive the success of our company and yours. 2 Moog Products & Services Moog is the world’s premier supplier of high performance products and support services for commercial, military and business jet aircraft. We offer a complete range of technologies, an extensive heritage in systems integration, and stand behind our products with an unparalleled global customer support network.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Washington, Dc 20594 Aircraft
    PB99-910401 ‘I NTSB/AAR-99/01 DCA94MA076 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT UNCONTROLLED DESCENT AND COLLISION WITH TERRAIN USAIR FLIGHT 427 BOEING 737-300, N513AU NEAR ALIQUIPPA, PENNSYLVANIA SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 6472A Abstract: This report explains the accident involving USAir flight 427, a Boeing 737-300, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, on September 8, 1994. Safety issues in the report focused on Boeing 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; the adequacy of the 737 rudder system design; unusual attitude training for air carrier pilots; and flight data recorder parameters. Safety recommendations concerning these issues were addressed to the Federal Aviation Administration. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal Agency dedicated to promoting aviation, raiload, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Recent publications are available in their entirety at http://www.ntsb.gov/. Other information about available publications may also be obtained from the Web site or by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, East, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from the National Technical Information Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Deck Solutions, Technologies and Services Moving the Industry Forward Garmin Innovation Brings Full Integration to Business Flight Operations and Support
    FLIGHT DECK SOLUTIONS, TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES MOVING THE INDUSTRY FORWARD GARMIN INNOVATION BRINGS FULL INTEGRATION TO BUSINESS FLIGHT OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT From web-based flight planning, fleet scheduling and tracking services to integrated flight display technology, head-up displays, advanced RNP navigation, onboard weather radar, Data Comm datalinks and much more — Garmin offers an unrivaled range of options to help make flying as smooth, safe, seamless and reliable as it can possibly be. Whether you operate a business jet, turboprop or hard-working helicopter, you can look to Garmin for industry-leading solutions scaled to fit your needs and your cockpit. The fact is, no other leading avionics manufacturer offers such breadth of capability — or such versatile configurability — in its lineup of flight deck solutions for aircraft manufacturers and aftermarket upgrades. When it comes to bringing out the best in your aircraft, Garmin innovation makes all the difference. CREATING A VIRTUAL REVOLUTION IN GLASS FLIGHT DECK SOLUTIONS By presenting key aircraft performance, navigation, weather, terrain routings and so on. The map function is designed to interface with a and traffic information, in context, on large high-resolution color variety of sensor inputs, so it’s easy to overlay weather, lightning, traffic, displays, today’s Garmin glass systems bring a whole new level of terrain, towers, powerlines and other avoidance system advisories, as clarity and simplicity to flight. The screens offer wide viewing angles, desired. These display inputs are selectable, allowing the pilot to add advanced backlighting and crystal-sharp readability, even in bright or deselect overlays to “build at will” the map view he or she prefers for sunlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Hondajet Model HA-420
    Honda Aircraft Company PILOT’S OPERATING MANUAL HondaJet Model HA-420 Original Issue: December 10, 2015 Revision B2: March 3, 2017 This Pilot’s Operating Manual is supplemental to the current FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual, HJ1-29000-003-001. If any inconsistencies exist between this Pilot’s Operating Manual and the FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual, the FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual shall be the governing authority. These commodities, technology, or software were exported from the United States in accordance with the Export Administration Regulations. Diversion contrary to U.S. law is prohibited. P/N: HJ1-29000-005-001 Copyright © Honda Aircraft Company 2016 FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY Honda Aircraft Company Copyright © Honda Aircraft Co., LLC 2016 All Rights Reserved. Published by Honda Aircraft Company 6430 Ballinger Road Greensboro, NC 27410 USA www.hondajet.com Copyright © Honda Aircraft Company 2016 FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY Honda Aircraft Company LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES This list contains all current pages with effective revision date. Use this list to maintain the most current version of the manual: Insert the latest revised pages. Then destroy superseded or deleted pages. Note: A vertical revision bar in the left margin of the page indicates pages that have been added, revised or deleted. MODEL HA-420 PILOT’S OPERATING MANUAL Title Page ...................................................................... March 3, 2017 Copyright Page ............................................................. March 3, 2017 List of Effective Pages .................................................. March 3, 2017 Record of Revisions ..................................................... March 3, 2017 Record of Temporary Revisions ................................... March 3, 2017 List of Service Bulletins ............................................... March 3, 2017 Documentation Group .................................................. March 3, 2017 SECTION 1 – SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION Pages 1 – 232 ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded At
    MEDIA RELEASE Broomfield, Colorado, USA, 6 July 2021 EXTENSIVE LIST OF NEW FEATURES FOR THE PILATUS PC-24 SUPER VERSATILE JET Based on customer feedback from over 50,000 hours of fleet operations, Pilatus has incorporated numerous new features into Super Versatile Jets which come off the production line from this year onward. As it is Pilatus‘ core philosophy to continuously improve and provide support over the life of the aircraft, many of these new features can be retrofitted in earlier serial number PC-24s. Starting with the passenger experience, the cabin features new executive seats which provide more comfort, more intuitive controls, and lighter weight. They fully recline to a flat position. The seats are attached to the cabin’s flat floor with quick -release mechanisms to facilitate rapid seating configuration changes on the ground. In lieu of the standard forward left-hand coat closet, operators may now choose to install a galley with options for a microwave oven, a coffee or espresso maker, a generous work surface, dedicated ice storage, and capacity for standard catering units. Smarter avionics For PC-24 flight crews, Pilatus and Honeywell have continued to develop and refine the Advanced Cockpit Environment (ACE). A touch-screen avionics controller replaces the multi-function controller as standard equipment. The touch-screen controller was first introduced in the PC-12 NGX, and has proven to be very well liked for entering and editing flight plan data, changing radio frequencies, and controlling the weather radar. It features a slip-resistant design around the bezel for stability and input precision in turbulence.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL PROGRAM #Aiaascitech
    4–8 JANUARY 2016 SAN DIEGO, CA The Largest Event for Aerospace Research, Development, and Technology FINAL PROGRAM www.aiaa-SciTech.org #aiaaSciTech 16-928 WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE TODAY WON’T BE TOMORROW. AT LOCKHEED MARTIN, WE’RE ENGINEERING A BETTER TOMORROW. We are partnering with our customers to accelerate manufacturing innovation from the laboratory to production. We push the limits in additive manufacturing, advanced materials, digital manufacturing and next generation electronics. Whether it is solving a global crisis like the need for clean drinking water or travelling even deeper into space, advanced manufacturing is opening the doors to the next great human revolution. Learn more at lockheedmartin.com © 2014 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION VC377_164 Executive Steering Committee AIAA SciTech 2016 2O16 Welcome Welcome to the AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2016 (AIAA SciTech 2016) – the world’s largest event for aerospace research, development, and technology. We are confident that you will come away from San Diego inspired and with the tools necessary to continue shaping the future of aerospace in new and exciting ways. From hearing preeminent industry thought leaders, to attending sessions where cutting- edge research will be unveiled, to interacting with peers – this will be a most fulfilling week! Our organizing committee has worked hard over the past year to ensure that our plenary sessions examine the most critical issues facing aerospace today, such as aerospace science and Richard George Lesieutre technology policy, lessons learned from a half century of aerospace innovation, resilient design, Christiansen The Pennsylvania and unmanned aerial systems. We will also focus on how AIAA and other stakeholders in State University Sierra Lobo, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • For Autopilot/Autothrottle for Autopilot/Yaw Damper for NASA
    NASA Contractor Report 4268 Design of Integrated Pitch Axis for Autopilot/Autothrottle and Integrated Lateral Axis for Autopilot/Yaw Damper for NASA TSRV Airplane Using Integral LQG Methodology Isaac Kaminer, Russell A. Bensnn, Edward E. Coleman, and Yaghoob S. Ebrahimi CONTRACT NAS1-18027 JAiVUARY 1990 NASA Contractor Report 4268 Design of Integrated Pitch Axis for Autopilot/Autothrottle and Integrated Lateral Axis for Autopilot/Yaw Damper for NASA TSRV Airplane Using Integral LQG Methodology Isaac Kaminer, Russell A. Benson, Edward E. Coleman, and Yaghoob S. Ebrahimi Boeing Commercial Airplane Company Seattle, Washington Prepared for Langley Research Center under Contract NAS1-18027 I\]S:GGA Aeicnauiics arid Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ................................................................ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 2 3.0 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................... 3 3.1 Symbols ............................................................ 3 3.2 Abbreviations ...................................................... 5 4.0 SETTING UP FLIGHT CONDITIONS AND AERO MODELS .................... 6 4.1 Cruise .............................................................. 9 4.2 Cruise Transition .................................................... 9 4.3 Landing ............................................................ 10 4.4 Generation of the Open-Loop Airplane Models
    [Show full text]
  • The Noise of Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flow Over Small Steps
    48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010 Orlando, Florida, USA 4-7 January 2010 Volume 1 of 21 ISBN: 978-1-61738-422-6 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. The contents of this work are copyrighted and additional reproduction in whole or in part are expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of the Publisher or copyright holder. The resale of the entire proceeding as received from CURRAN is permitted. For reprint permission, please contact AIAA’s Business Manager, Technical Papers. Contact by phone at 703-264-7500; fax at 703-264-7551 or by mail at 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 THE NOISE OF TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW OVER SMALL STEPS.........................................................................1 M. Ji, M. Wang CHARACTERISTICS OF SEPARATED FLOW SURFACE PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS ON AN AXISYMMETRIC BUMP...............................................................................................................................................................................18 G. Byun, R. Simpson THE NEAR-FIELD PRESSURE OF A SMALL-SCALE ROTOR DURING HOVER..........................................................................32 J. Stephenson, C. Tinney, J. Sirohi INVESTIGATION OF NEAR-FIELD FLOW UNSTEADINESS AROUND A NACA0012 WINGTIP USING LARGE-EDDY-SIMULATION
    [Show full text]
  • Single Engine | Pressurized Turboprop Avionics Enhanced Automatic Flight Control System (Afcs)
    CABIN CLASS | SINGLE ENGINE | PRESSURIZED TURBOPROP AVIONICS ENHANCED AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS) GARMIN G1000 NXi IS THE NEXT GENERATION OF GLASS COCKPITS No pilot help The G1000 NXi system takes the legacy G1000 glass flight deck platform to a higher level of performance and capability. It combines added processing power Light righting force with brighter, smoother high resolution displays and enhanced optional features including; SurfaceWatch runway identification and alerting technology, Connext Stronger righting force (Flight Stream 510) wireless cockpit connectivity, HSI mapping on your primary flight display, animated NEXRAD datalink weather and autopilot coupled visual Electronic Stability Automatic Level Mode Protection (ESP) (Optional) (Blue Button) approaches down to pilot selectable minimums. Any pilot who’s ever been startled Level Mode will return the aircraft to a to attention by a stall warning horn wings level attitude with zero vertical in a busy cockpit will appreciate the speed with the push of a button. It M500 G1000 NXi SHOWN *Shown with Aspen EFD1000 Standby Flight. Garmin GI-275 now standard. proactive stability augmentation of automatically engages the autopilot to the ESP monitoring technology. This return the aircraft to straight and level CONNECTED AIRCRAFT downloading to your mobile device — Flight Stream 510 (Optional) feature functions independently of the flight in case of pilot disorientation. G1000 NXi’s ability to simplify and then transfer the data to your aircraft Assemble all flight information on your mobile autopilot system ó although it uses the streamline your piloting workload when you get to the airport. device in advance, then wirelessly sync with HSI MAPPING NEXRAD DATALINK WEATHER same control servos to gently nudge the Approach and Landing starts even before you climb into the the cockpit once you get to the airport.
    [Show full text]