DOCSLIB.ORG

Program Schedule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Program Schedule Program Schedule SciTech 2016 January 03 - 08, 2016 The Program Report was last updated December 11, 2015 at 01:06 AM EST. To view the most recent meeting schedule online, visit https://aiaa-mst16.abstractcentral.com/planner.jsp Sunday, January 03, 2016 Time Session or Event Info 6:00 PM-7:30 PM, Seaport H, NW-01. Student Welcome Reception, Networking, Forum Event Monday, January 04, 2016 Time Session or Event Info 7:00 AM-7:30 AM, Session Room Foyers, NW-02. Monday Early Morning Networking Coffee Break, Networking, Forum Event 7:30 AM-8:00 AM, Session Rooms, SB-01. Monday Morning Speakers' Briefing, Speakers' Briefing, Forum Event 8:00 AM-9:00 AM, Seaport A-E, PLNRY-01. Monday Morning Plenary Panel Aerospace S&T Policy in the 2016 Political Arena , Plenary, Forum Event 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Nautical, AA-01. Aeroacoustics - Jet Noise I, Technical Paper, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Chair: Krishan Ahuja, [email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology; Co-Chair: Douglas Nark, [email protected], NASA Langley Research Center Mean Velocity and Turbulence Measurements of Supersonic Jets with 9:00-9:30 AM Fluidic Inserts R.W. Powers; S. Hromisin; D.K. McLaughlin; P.J. Morris Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Jet Noise Suppression via 9:30-10:00 AM Downstream Microjet Fluidic Injection H. Pourhashem; I. Kalkhoran Fluctuating Pressure Gradients in Heated Supersonic Jets K.T. Lowe; 10:00-10:30 AM C.C. Nelson Extracting Near-Field Structures Related to Noise Production in High 10:30-11:00 AM Speed Jets P. Kan; J. Lewalle; M.N. Glauser; S.P. Gogeneni; B.V. Kiel Scale-specific Intermittency and Spatio-temporal Correlations in a 11:00-11:30 AM Supersonic Jet U. Sasidharan Nair; L.M. Agostini; D.V. Gaitonde Including Finite Surface Span Effects in Empirical Jet-Surface 11:30-12:00 PM Interaction Noise Models C.A. Brown 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Golden Hill B, ABPSI-01/GEPC-01. NASA ERA Systems Integration I, Technical Paper, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Co-Chair: Kevin James, [email protected]; Co-Chair: Laurence Leavitt, [email protected], N A S A Overview Of ERA Integrated Technology Demonstration (ITD) 51A 9:00-9:30 AM Ultra-High Bypass (UHB) Integration for Hybrid Wing Body (HWB) (Invited) J.D. Flamm; K. James; J.T. Bonet Oral Presentation. Summary of the Configuration Development of the BWB-009H1 Concept Vehicle for ERA Integrated Technology 9:30-10:00 AM Demonstration (ITD) 51A Ultra-High Bypass (UHB) Integration for Hybrid Wing Body (HWB) (Invited) J.T. Bonet; N. Princen; D. Roman Wind Tunnel Model Design and Fabrication of a 5.75% Scale Blended 10:00-10:30 AM -Wing-Body Twin Jet Configuration (Invited) E.D. Dickey; N. Princen; J.T. Bonet; G.K. Ige Overview of Low-speed Aerodynamic Tests on a 5.75% Scale 10:30-11:00 AM Blended-Wing-Body Twin Jet Configuration (Invited) D.D. Vicroy; E.D. Dickey; N. Princen; M. Beyar Experimental Evaluation of Inlet Distortion on an Ejector Powered Hybrid Wing Body at Take-off and Landing Conditions (Invited) M.B. 11:00-11:30 AM Carter; P.R. Shea; J.D. Flamm; M.J. Schuh; K. James; M.R. Sexton; D. Tompkins; M. Beyar Turbine Powered Simulator Calibration and Testing for Hybrid Wing 11:30-12:00 PM Body Powered Airframe Integration (Invited) K. Long; P.R. Shea; J.D. Flamm; D. Tompkins; M. Beyar Phased Acoustic Array Measurements of a 5.75% Hybrid Wing body 12:00-12:30 PM Aircraft (Invited) N.J. Burnside; W.C. Horne; K.R. Elmer; R. Cheng; L. Brusniak 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Cortez Hill A, AFM-01. Biometric Flight Mechanics, Technical Paper, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Chair: Richard Lind, [email protected], University of Florida; Co-Chair: Ming Xin, [email protected], University of Missouri The Dynamics of Passive Wing-Pitching in Hovering Flight of 9:00-9:30 AM Flapping Micro Air Vehicles Using Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Simulations L. Chang; N.O. Perez-Arancibia Aerodynamic Model Identification of a Clap-and-Fling Flapping-Wing MAV: a Comparison between Quasi-steady and Black-box 9:30-10:00 AM Approaches S.F. Armanini; J.V. Caetano; C.C. de Visser; G.C. de Croon; M. Mulder Effect of Unsteady Aerodynamics on the Trim of Hovering Insects and 10:00-10:30 AM FWMAVs A. Mouy; A. Rossi; H.E. Taha Dynamic Stability of a Hawkmoth-scale Flapping-wing Micro Air 10:30-11:00 AM Vehicle during Forward Flight J. Kim; J. Han; S. Choi; J. Han Minimum-Time Transition of FWMAVs from Hovering to Forward 11:00-11:30 AM Flight A. Hussein; H.E. Taha Effects of Advance Ratio on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of an 11:30-12:00 PM Insect Wing in Forward Flight J. Han; J. Han; J. Chang Oral Presentation. Systems level analysis of resonant mechnisms for 12:00-12:30 PM flapping-wing flyers J. Kok; J. Chahl 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Cortez Hill B, AFM-02. Atmospheric Entry, Hypersonic Flight and Aeroassist Technology I, Technical Paper, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Co-Chair: Tom Berger, [email protected], US Army Aviation Development Directorate -AFDD; Chair: Michael Bolender, [email protected], Air Force Research Lab High Mass Mars Exploration using Slender Entry Vehicles K. Mall; 9:00-9:30 AM M.J. Grant Incorporation of Ablative Shape Change into Conceptual Hypersonic 9:30-10:00 AM Mission Design H. Saranathan; M.J. Grant Strategies for Landing Large Ballistic Coefficient Vehicles on Mars 10:00-10:30 AM T.R. Anderson; Z.R. Putnam; R.D. Braun Stability Analysis of Multibody Systems for Mars Descent and Landing 10:30-11:00 AM E. Mooij Robust Aerial Deployment of Mars Airplane with Tilted Folding-Axis 11:00-11:30 AM K. Fujita; H. Nagai; A. Oyama Application of Taylor Series Integration to Reentry Problems M. 11:30-12:00 PM Bergsma; E. Mooij 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Balboa B, AMT-01. Velocimetry I, Technical Paper, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Co-Chair: Tobias Ecker, [email protected], Virginia Tech; Co- Chair: David Plemmons, [email protected], Aerospace Testing Alliance (ATA) 100-kHz burst-mode particle image velocimetry: space-time correlations and considerations for spatial and temporal resolution 9:00-9:30 AM J.D. Miller; N. Jiang; D. Thul; M. Slipchenko; J. Mance; T.R. Meyer; S. Roy; J.R. Gord Velocity Measurements in an Arcjet Erosion Test Facility D.H. 9:30-10:00 AM Plemmons; N. Galyen; E.S. Smith; R.G. Porter Particle Image Velocimetry for Transonic Unsteady Flow Field around 10:00-10:30 AM a Rocket Fairing Model S. Koike; K. Nakakita; S. Tsutsumi Towards shear flow measurements using FLEET Y. Zhang; N. 10:30-11:00 AM Calvert; A. Dogariu; R.B. Miles Scale-up of the Time-Resolved Doppler Global Velocimetry 11:00-11:30 AM Technique T. Ecker; K. Lowe; W. Ng Velocity Spectrum Estimation in Shock–Boundary Layer Interaction T. 11:30-12:00 PM Jiang; A. Schreyer; L. Larchevêque; S. Piponniau; D. Pierre 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Coronado D, AMT-10/SD-15. Advances in Fluid-Structural Interaction Experimentation, Technical Paper, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Co-Chair: Timothy Beberniss, [email protected]; Chair: Justin Wagner, [email protected], Sandia National Laboratories Oral Presentation. Advancements and Experimental Measurement 9:00-9:30 AM Challenges of Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction Influence on the Dynamic Response of a Flexible Panel T. Beberniss Oral Presentation. Optical Full-field Response Verification of Wind 9:30-10:00 AM Tunnel Tests on Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators A.M. Calomino; K. Johnson; M. Cheatwood; A. Cassell; G. Swanson; C.D. Kazemba Oral Presentation. High-Speed Fluid-Structure Interaction 10:00-10:30 AM Experiments at Sandia National Laboratories K.M. Casper; J.L. Wagner; S.J. Beresh; J. Henfling; R. Spillers Oral Presentation. Simultaneous time-resolved PIV, and force 10:30-11:00 AM measurements of membrane wings B. Ganapathisubramani Oral Presentation. Structural Response to Fluid/Acoustic Coupling 11:00-11:30 AM N.E. Murray Oral Presentation. Digital image correlation used for dynamic full-field 11:30-12:00 PM deformation and strain measurements: Examples and applications P. Reu Oral Presentation. FSI measurements of nuclear fuel bundles during 12:00-12:30 PM earthquakes P. Bardet; N. Weichselbaum; S. Hussain 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, Coronado E, APA-02. Special Session: Simulation of Rotor in Hover I, Technical Paper, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Chair: Nathan Hariharan, [email protected], CREATE-AV; Co-Chair: Robert Narducci, [email protected], Boeing Defense, Space & Security Helicopter Aerodynamic Modeling of S-76 Rotor with Tip-Shape 9:00-9:30 AM Variations: Review of AIAA Standardized Hover Evaluations N.S. Hariharan; R.P. Narducci; T. Egolf A Comparison of CFD Hover Predictions for the Sikorsky S-76 Rotor 9:30-10:00 AM R. Jain Assessment of S-76 Rotor Hover Performance in Ground Effect Using 10:00-10:30 AM an Unstructured Mixed Mesh Method J. Hwang; J. Choi; O. Kwon Numerical simulation of Hovering S-76 Helicopter Rotor including Far- 10:30-11:00 AM Field Analysis P. Gardarein; A. Le Pape Mesh Adaption for Tracking Vortex Structures in OVERTURNS 11:00-11:30 AM Simulation of an S-76 Rotor in Hover J. Hayes; B. Govindarajan; J.D. Baeder Direct Comparsion of Hover Prediction Workshop Results E.P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automated Generic Parameterized Design of Aircraft Fairing and Windshield
    Automated generic parameterized design of aircraft fairing and windshield Vijaykumar Govindharajan Aakash Narender Singh LIU-IEI-TEK-A-12/01271-SE Department of Management and Engineering Division of Flumes Department of Management and Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden i ii Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances. The online availability of the document implies permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, or to print out single copies for his/her own use and to use it unchanged for non-commercial research and educational purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Advisory Circular 20-97B
    Subject: AIRCRAFT TIRE MAINTENANCE Date: 4/18/05 AC No.: 20-97B AND OPERATIONAL PRACTICES Initiated by: AFS-306 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides recommended tire care and maintenance practices needed to assure the safety of support personnel and the continued airworthiness of aircraft. Specifically, this AC provides guidance on the installation, inflation, maintenance, and removal of aircraft tires. In addition, this AC provides guidance on those operational practices necessary to maintain safe aircraft operations. This AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. It is issued for guidance purposes and to outline acceptable tire maintenance and operational practices. In lieu of following this method without deviation, operators may elect to follow an alternative method that has also been found acceptable by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2. CANCELLATION. AC 20-97A, High-Speed Tire Maintenance and Operational Practices, dated May 13, 1987, is cancelled. 3. RELATED REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS. a. Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR): (1) Part 21, subpart O, Technical Standard Order Authorizations. (2) Part 23, Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes. (3) Part 25, Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. (4) Part 27, Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft. (5) Part 29, Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft. (6) Part 43, Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration. (7) Part 145, Repair Stations. b. FAA ACs. Copies of the following ACs may be obtained from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Center, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341 Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785, and may be downloaded at the following Web site: http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/acs/ac-idx.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Aircraft Tire Wear with Initial Wheel Rotational Speed
    International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 2 3-2-2015 Comparison of Aircraft Tire Wear with Initial Wheel Rotational Speed Abdurrhman A. Alroqi University of Sussex, [email protected] Weiji Wang University of Sussex, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa Part of the Aeronautical Vehicles Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Alroqi, A. A., & Wang, W. (2015). Comparison of Aircraft Tire Wear with Initial Wheel Rotational Speed. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15394/ ijaaa.2015.1043 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comparison of Aircraft Tire Wear with Initial Wheel Rotational Speed Cover Page Footnote The authors would like to acknowledge University of Sussex for its support with the literature and related resources. This article is available in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace: https://commons.erau.edu/ ijaaa/vol2/iss1/2 Alroqi and Wang: Comparison of Aircraft Tire Wear with Initial Wheel Rotational Speed In this paper, the landing impact of an aircraft is described using a physical model of a single wheel in the main landing gear. The purpose of this study is to understand potential tire-life improvements that could be made by reducing abrasive skidding between aircraft tires and runway surfaces immediately after touchdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-And-Yaw Oscillations
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 55 No. 5 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight May 1998 Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-and-yaw Oscillations Fluid leaking from the cabin onto the yaw-damper coupler in the electronic-and-equipment bay affected electronic signals transmitted to the yaw-damper actuator and caused a dutch-roll oscillation. FSF Editorial Staff On Oct. 22, 1995, a Boeing 737-236 Advanced was • “Sufficiently conductive contaminant paths in straight-and-level flight at Flight Level (FL) 200 between certain adjacent pins had affected the (20,000 feet), at an indicated airspeed of 290 knots phase and magnitude of the signals transmitted when roll-and-yaw oscillations began. The flight crew to the yaw-damper actuator, thereby stimulating disengaged the autopilot, autothrottles and yaw a forced dutch-roll mode of the aircraft; damper, but the uncommanded roll-and-yaw oscillations continued. • “The location of the E&E bay — beneath the cabin floor in the area of the aircraft doors, galleys The crew declared an emergency and descended to and toilets — made it vulnerable to fluid ingress 7,000 feet. The oscillations stopped when airspeed was from a variety of sources; [and,] reduced to about 250 knots. After a satisfactory check of the aircraft’s low-speed handling characteristics, the • “The crew actions immediately following the crew returned to London (England) Gatwick Airport onset of the dutch-roll oscillations did not result and landed without further incident. in the disengagement of the malfunctioning yaw- damper system.” The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), in its final report on the incident, identified four causal factors: The B-737, operated by British Airways, was built in 1980 and had accumulated 37,871 hours in service.
    [Show full text]
  • 11ADOBL04 December 2010
    11ADOBL04 December 2010 Use of rudder on Airbus A300-600/A310 (extracted from former FCOM Bulletin N°15/1 – Subject N°40) Reason for issue On February 8th, 2002, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in cooperation with the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), issued recommendations that aircraft manufacturers re-emphasize the structural certification requirements for the rudder and vertical stabilizer, showing how some maneuvers can result in exceeding design lim- its and even lead to structural failure. The purpose of this Bulletin is to re-emphasize proper operational use of the rudder, highlight certification requirements and rud- der control design characteristics. Yaw control General In flight, yaw control is provided by the rudder, and directional stability is provided by the vertical stabilizer. The rudder and vertical stabilizer are sized to meet the two following objectives: Provide sufficient lateral control of the aircraft during crosswind takeoffs and landings, within the published crosswind limits (refer to FCOM Operating Limitations chapter). Provide positive aircraft control under conditions of engine failure and maximum asymmetric thrust, at any speed above Vmcg (minimum control speed - on ground). The vertical stabilizer and the rudder must be capable of generating sufficient yawing moments to maintain directional control of the aircraft. The rudder deflection, necessary to achieve these yawing moments, and the resulting sideslip angles place significant aerodynamic loads on the rudder and on the vertical stabilizer. Both are designed to sustain loads as prescribed in the JAR/FAR 25 certification requirements which define several lateral loading conditions (maneuver, gust loads and asymmetric loads due to engine failure) leading to the required level of structural strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Schedule
    Program Schedule AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2015 January 05 - 09, 2015 The Program Report was last updated December 18, 2014 at 04:16 PM EST. To view the most recent meeting schedule online, visit https://aiaa-mst15.abstractcentral.com/planner.jsp Monday, January 05, 2015 Time Session or Event Info 8:00 AM-9:00 AM, Osceola Ballroom CD, PLNRY-01. Opening Keynote , Plenary, Forum 9:00 AM-12:30 PM, St. George 112, ISC-01. International Student Conference (Undergraduate Category), Technical Paper, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Chair: Chris Tavares, The Boeing Company Martian RHOVER Feasibility Study J. Fuentes; R. Pankaja 9:00-9:30 AM Kaluarachchi Satellite Formation Control using Differential Drag S.R. Omar; J.M. 9:30-10:00 AM Wersinger Manufacturing of Triaxial Quasi-three-dimensional Composite 10:00-10:30 AM Materials G. Peterson; D. Liu The Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Millimeter Wave Lenses 10:30-11:00 AM for Beamed Energy Applications S.E. Sloan Colorimetric hydrogel-based microfluidic assay system to monitor 11:00-11:30 AM malnutrition in a microgravity environment J.K. Tsosie Significance of Constituent Chemical age on Solid Rocket Propellant 11:30-12:00 PM Regression Rates D.J. Dulin; G.S. Gibson 12:00-12:30 PM Aerodynamic Testing and Development of Sunswift eVe S. Ambrose 9:30 AM-12:30 PM, Miami 2, AA-01. Computational Aeroacoustics I, Technical Paper, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Chair: Walter Eversman, Missouri University of Science and Technology A Computational Study of Flow Within Cavities with Complex 9:30-10:00 AM Geometric Features M.F.
    [Show full text]
  • B737-800 FTD System Failures
    IOS B737 FTD System Failures 0 Welcome The information contained within this document is believed to be accurate at the time of publication. However, it is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Multi Pilot Simulations (MPS). Multi Pilot Simulations assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document. Boeing, Boeing 737 and Boeing 737NG are registered trademarks of Boeing Company. Airbus, Airbus A320 are registered trademarks of Airbus. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. No rights or claims can be derived from data in this document. WELCOME-1 FSTD: B737 FTD 1 Index Applicability: - Failures marked with a @-sign in the failure title are available on FNPT II/MCC and FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs - Failures without a @-sign are available on FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs only 0 WELCOME .................................................................................................................................. 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 1 DOCUMENT OWNER ....................................................................................................................................... 1 REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INDEX ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog
    Commercial Aftermarket Services About Moog Moog Inc. is a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of precision motion control products and systems. Over the past 60 years, we have developed a reputation for delivering innovative solutions for the most challenging motion control applications. As a result, we have become a key supplier to the world’s leading aircraft manufacturers and are positioned on virtually every platform in the marketplace – supplying reliable actuation systems that are highly supportable and add significant value for our customers. A key element of our success has been our customer focus. With Moog, you will find a team of people ready to deliver quality products and support services, all while being flexible and responsive to your needs. Our superior products and services directly reflect the creativity, work ethic and remarkable attention to purpose of our people. We exhibit our commitment by supporting our products throughout the life cycle of a platform, from idea conception and design of original parts, to aftermarket support and 24/7 service. With Moog, you will find a wide spectrum of products, services and support from a dedicated and trustworthy organization. Our culture, coupled with our commitment to our customers, process control and product innovation, will continue to drive the success of our company and yours. 2 Moog Products & Services Moog is the world’s premier supplier of high performance products and support services for commercial, military and business jet aircraft. We offer a complete range of technologies, an extensive heritage in systems integration, and stand behind our products with an unparalleled global customer support network.
    [Show full text]
  • Qtr 02 09 a Quarterly Publication Boeing.Com/Commercial/ Aeromagazine
    Qtr_02 09 A QUarterlY PUBLIcatION BOEING.COM/COMMERCIAL/ AEROMAGAZINE Material Management: Providing Customer Solutions 777 Freighter: Greater Efficiency for Long-Haul Operators Landing Gear Program Provides Overhaul Alternative Exceeding Tire Speed Rating During Takeoff Contribution of Flight Systems to Performance-Based Navigation AERO Cover photo: 777 in factory AERO Contents 03 Material Management: Providing Customer Solutions Our services are designed to help airlines operate more efficiently while reducing costs. 05 777 Freighter: Greater Efficiency for Long-Haul Operators The Boeing 777 Freighter is an efficient, long-range, high-capacity freighter offering the advanced features of the 05 777 family. 11 Landing Gear Program Provides Overhaul Alternative Boeing’s overhaul and exchange program offers operators additional options for 11 servicing landing gear. 15 Exceeding Tire Speed Rating During Takeoff Boeing offers guidance to help prevent 15 tire overspeed events during takeoff. 21 Contribution of Flight Systems to Performance-Based Navigation The evolution of flight management systems has led the way for performance- based navigation and the Next Generation 21 Air Transportation System. 01 WWW.boeIng.com/commercIal/aeromagaZIne Issue 34_Quarter 02 | 2009 AERO Publisher Design Cover photography Editorial Board Shannon Frew Methodologie Jeff Corwin Gary Bartz, Frank Billand, Richard Breuhaus, Darrell Hokuf, Al John, Doug Lane, Jill Langer, Mick Pegg, Wade Price, Bob Rakestraw, Editorial director Writer Printer Frank Santoni, Jerome
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Washington, Dc 20594 Aircraft
    PB99-910401 ‘I NTSB/AAR-99/01 DCA94MA076 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT UNCONTROLLED DESCENT AND COLLISION WITH TERRAIN USAIR FLIGHT 427 BOEING 737-300, N513AU NEAR ALIQUIPPA, PENNSYLVANIA SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 6472A Abstract: This report explains the accident involving USAir flight 427, a Boeing 737-300, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, on September 8, 1994. Safety issues in the report focused on Boeing 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; the adequacy of the 737 rudder system design; unusual attitude training for air carrier pilots; and flight data recorder parameters. Safety recommendations concerning these issues were addressed to the Federal Aviation Administration. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal Agency dedicated to promoting aviation, raiload, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Recent publications are available in their entirety at http://www.ntsb.gov/. Other information about available publications may also be obtained from the Web site or by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, East, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from the National Technical Information Service.
    [Show full text]