DOCSLIB.ORG

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, Dc 20594 Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PB99-910401 ‘I NTSB/AAR-99/01 DCA94MA076 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT UNCONTROLLED DESCENT AND COLLISION WITH TERRAIN USAIR FLIGHT 427 BOEING 737-300, N513AU NEAR ALIQUIPPA, PENNSYLVANIA SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 6472A Abstract: This report explains the accident involving USAir flight 427, a Boeing 737-300, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, on September 8, 1994. Safety issues in the report focused on Boeing 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; the adequacy of the 737 rudder system design; unusual attitude training for air carrier pilots; and flight data recorder parameters. Safety recommendations concerning these issues were addressed to the Federal Aviation Administration. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal Agency dedicated to promoting aviation, raiload, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Recent publications are available in their entirety at http://www.ntsb.gov/. Other information about available publications may also be obtained from the Web site or by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, East, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from the National Technical Information Service. To purchase this publication, order report number PB99-910401 from: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 (800) 553-6847 or (703) 605-6000 THESE CORRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS VERSION OF THE PUBLISHED REPORT: AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT NTSB/AAR-99/01 (PB99-910401) UNCONTROLLED DESCENT AND COLLISION WITH TERRAIN USAIR FLIGHT 427, BOEING 737-300, N513AU NEAR ALIQUIPPA, PENNSYLVANIA SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 • Pages 29-31 have been updated to correct figure placement. (4 Nov 99) Figures 9 and 10 were originally reversed. • Page 45 has been updated to correct a quotation mark. (4 Nov 99) "wow about 0943:08" was incorrectly quoted. • Page 102 has been updated to correct figure references for the United flight 585 simulations on roll and yaw rate. (16 Feb 00) Aircraft Accident Report Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain USAir Flight 427 Boeing 737-300, N513AU Near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania September 8, 1994 R A N S P T O L R A T UR I B P L US U A N NUM E O T I I O T A N N S A D F E R NTSB/AAR-99/01 T Y B O A PB99-910401 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 6472A 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted March 24, 1999 Washington, D.C. 20594 Contents iii Aircraft Accident Report Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................ ix Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... xi Glossary of Terms...................................................................................................xv 1. Factual Information..................................................................................................1 1.1 History of Flight ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Injuries to Persons ...............................................................................................7 1.3 Damage to Aircraft..............................................................................................7 1.4 Other Damage......................................................................................................7 1.5 Personnel Information .........................................................................................7 1.5.1 The Captain.....................................................................................................8 1.5.2 The First Officer ...........................................................................................10 1.5.3 Flight Attendant Information........................................................................11 1.6 Airplane Information.........................................................................................11 1.6.1 Accident Airplane Maintenance Information ...............................................12 1.6.1.1 Inspections.............................................................................................12 1.6.1.2 Events on Earlier Flights .......................................................................14 1.6.2 Boeing 737 Hydraulic System Information..................................................15 1.6.2.1 Hydraulic System Maintenance.............................................................18 1.6.3 Boeing 737 Flight Control Systems..............................................................19 1.6.3.1 Auto-Flight System ...............................................................................19 1.6.3.2 Rudder Control System .........................................................................23 1.6.3.2.1 Main Rudder PCU and Servo Valve ..............................................29 1.7 Meteorological Information...............................................................................33 1.8 Aids to Navigation.............................................................................................34 1.9 Communications................................................................................................34 1.10 Airport Information ...........................................................................................35 1.11 Flight Recorders ................................................................................................35 1.11.1 Cockpit Voice Recorder ...............................................................................35 1.11.2 Flight Data Recorder.....................................................................................35 1.12 Wreckage and Impact Information....................................................................36 1.12.1 On-Site Examination ....................................................................................36 1.12.2 Reconstruction Examination.........................................................................39 1.12.2.1 Flight Control System Components ......................................................40 1.12.2.2 Examination/Reconstruction of Cargo Compartments..........................41 Contents iv Aircraft Accident Report 1.12.2.3 Examination/Reconstruction of the Auxiliary Fuel Tank .....................41 1.12.3 Examination of Wreckage for Indications of Possible Bird Strike...............42 1.13 Medical and Pathological Information ..............................................................43 1.14 Fire.....................................................................................................................43 1.15 Survival Aspects................................................................................................44 1.16 Tests and Research ............................................................................................44 1.16.1 Background Information—Other Significant Yaw/Roll Events...................44 1.16.1.1 United Airlines Flight 585 Accident .....................................................44 1.16.1.2 Eastwind Airlines Flight 517 Incident...................................................51 1.16.2 Wake Vortex Tests and Studies Resulting From the USAir Flight 427 Accident...........................................................................54 1.16.3 Flight and Simulator Tests of Effects of Various Flight Control and System Failures......................................................................................59 1.16.3.1 Eastwind Flight 517 Flight Tests...........................................................61 1.16.4 Flight Control Characteristics Flight Tests (Blowdown and Crossover Airspeed) .....................................................................................63 1.16.5 Examination and Testing of Flight Control Systems/Components ..............65 1.16.5.1 Rudder Pedal Assemblies......................................................................65 1.16.5.2 Tests to Determine the Effects of Rudder Cable External Forces, Breaks, and Blocked Input Linkage ......................................................66 1.16.5.3 Examination and Testing of Standby Rudder........................................68 1.16.5.3.1 Metallurgical Examination of Standby Rudder Components ........68 1.16.5.3.2 Standby System Actuator Binding/Jam Tests ................................69 1.16.5.4 Detailed Examinations and Tests of Main Rudder PCUs .....................71 1.16.5.4.1 Detailed Examinations of Main Rudder PCU Servo Valves..........71 1.16.5.4.1.1 Examination of Exemplar Servo Valves for White Layer.........73 1.16.5.4.2 PCU Dynamic Testing ...................................................................73 1.16.5.4.3 Tests of Hydraulic Fluid.................................................................74 1.16.5.4.4 Tests to Determine the Effects of
Recommended publications
  • Usair Flight 427

    Usair Flight 427

    SUBMISSION OF THE AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION TO THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD REGARDING THE ACCIDENT INVOLVING USAIR FLIGHT 427 NEAR PITTSBURGH, PA ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. B737 FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN a. Rudder Blowdown b. B737 Rudder Control System Certification c. B737 Flight Control Incidents d. FAA Critical Design Review Team e. NTSB Safety Recommendations and FAA Actions III. AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE a. Simulator Validation Testing b. Flight Kinematics Study IV. B737 LATERAL VS. DIRECTIONAL CONTROL AUTHORITY V. HUMAN PERFORMANCE a. Flightcrew General: Health and Background b. Flightcrew Psychological and Psychosocial Factual Information c. Crew Communications - Intra-cockpit d. Task-Related Speech e. Procedural Speech f. Non-Task-Related Speech g. Crew Communications - ATC h. Crew Interactions I. Observance of Sterile Cockpit Procedures j. Spatial Disorientation Studies k. Biomechanics Associated with Attempting to Move Blocked or Jammed Rudder Pedals l. Analysis of CVR - Speech and Physiological Aspects m. Speech Analysis Background n. Breathing Patterns and Muscular Exertion Background o. Crew Psychological Stress During the Upset Event p. Crew Physical Activity During the Upset Event q. In-depth Examination of Attempted Flight Control Manipulations r. Pilot Responses to Uncommanded Upsets s. Unintended Acceleration t. Rudder Pedal Damage u. Seat Track Damage VI. CONCLUSIONS VII. RECOMMENDATIONS Back to Top I. Executive Summary On September 8, 1994, USAir Flight 427, a Boeing 737-300, crashed while maneuvering to land at Pittsburgh International Airport. The airplane was being operated on an instrument flight plan under 14 CFR Part 121 on a regularly scheduled flight from Chicago, Illinois.
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A

    Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
  • Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-And-Yaw Oscillations

    Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-And-Yaw Oscillations

    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 55 No. 5 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight May 1998 Boeing 737 Postmaintenance Test Flight Encounters Uncommanded Roll-and-yaw Oscillations Fluid leaking from the cabin onto the yaw-damper coupler in the electronic-and-equipment bay affected electronic signals transmitted to the yaw-damper actuator and caused a dutch-roll oscillation. FSF Editorial Staff On Oct. 22, 1995, a Boeing 737-236 Advanced was • “Sufficiently conductive contaminant paths in straight-and-level flight at Flight Level (FL) 200 between certain adjacent pins had affected the (20,000 feet), at an indicated airspeed of 290 knots phase and magnitude of the signals transmitted when roll-and-yaw oscillations began. The flight crew to the yaw-damper actuator, thereby stimulating disengaged the autopilot, autothrottles and yaw a forced dutch-roll mode of the aircraft; damper, but the uncommanded roll-and-yaw oscillations continued. • “The location of the E&E bay — beneath the cabin floor in the area of the aircraft doors, galleys The crew declared an emergency and descended to and toilets — made it vulnerable to fluid ingress 7,000 feet. The oscillations stopped when airspeed was from a variety of sources; [and,] reduced to about 250 knots. After a satisfactory check of the aircraft’s low-speed handling characteristics, the • “The crew actions immediately following the crew returned to London (England) Gatwick Airport onset of the dutch-roll oscillations did not result and landed without further incident. in the disengagement of the malfunctioning yaw- damper system.” The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), in its final report on the incident, identified four causal factors: The B-737, operated by British Airways, was built in 1980 and had accumulated 37,871 hours in service.
  • Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Volume 15

    Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Volume 15

    Library of Congress Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Volume 15 Cutting Marsh (From photograph loaned by John N. Davidson.) Wisconsin State historical society. COLLECTIONS OF THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY. OF WISCONSIN EDITED AND ANNOTATED BY REUBEN GOLD THWAITES Secretary and Superintendent of the Society VOL. XV Published by Authority of Law MADISON DEMOCRAT PRINTING COMPANY, STATE PRINTER 1900 LC F576 .W81 2d set The Editor, both for the Society and for himself, disclaims responsibility for any statement made either in the historical documents published herein, or in articles contributed to this volume. 1036011 18 N43 LC CONTENTS AND ILLUSTRATIONS. Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Volume 15 http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbum.7689d Library of Congress THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS SERIAL RECORD NOV 22 1943 Copy 2 Page. Cutting Marsh Frontispiece. Officers of the Society, 1900 v Preface vii Some Wisconsin Indian Conveyances, 1793–1836. Introduction The Editor 1 Illustrative Documents: Land Cessions—To Dominique Ducharme, 1; to Jacob Franks, 3; to Stockbridge and Brothertown Indians, 6; to Charles Grignon, 19. Milling Sites—At Wisconsin River Rapids, 9; at Little Chute, 11; at Doty's Island, 14; on west shore of Green Bay, 16; on Waubunkeesippe River, 18. Miscellaneous—Contract to build a house, 4; treaty with Oneidas, 20. Illustrations: Totems—Accompanying Indian signatures, 2, 3, 4. Sketch of Cutting Marsh. John E. Chapin, D. D. 25 Documents Relating to the Stockbridge Mission, 1825–48. Notes by William Ward Wight and The Editor. 39 Illustrative Documents: Grant—Of Statesburg mission site, 39. Letters — Jesse Miner to Stockbridges, 41; Jeremiah Evarts to Miner, 43; [Augustus T.
  • 11ADOBL04 December 2010

    11ADOBL04 December 2010

    11ADOBL04 December 2010 Use of rudder on Airbus A300-600/A310 (extracted from former FCOM Bulletin N°15/1 – Subject N°40) Reason for issue On February 8th, 2002, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in cooperation with the French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), issued recommendations that aircraft manufacturers re-emphasize the structural certification requirements for the rudder and vertical stabilizer, showing how some maneuvers can result in exceeding design lim- its and even lead to structural failure. The purpose of this Bulletin is to re-emphasize proper operational use of the rudder, highlight certification requirements and rud- der control design characteristics. Yaw control General In flight, yaw control is provided by the rudder, and directional stability is provided by the vertical stabilizer. The rudder and vertical stabilizer are sized to meet the two following objectives: Provide sufficient lateral control of the aircraft during crosswind takeoffs and landings, within the published crosswind limits (refer to FCOM Operating Limitations chapter). Provide positive aircraft control under conditions of engine failure and maximum asymmetric thrust, at any speed above Vmcg (minimum control speed - on ground). The vertical stabilizer and the rudder must be capable of generating sufficient yawing moments to maintain directional control of the aircraft. The rudder deflection, necessary to achieve these yawing moments, and the resulting sideslip angles place significant aerodynamic loads on the rudder and on the vertical stabilizer. Both are designed to sustain loads as prescribed in the JAR/FAR 25 certification requirements which define several lateral loading conditions (maneuver, gust loads and asymmetric loads due to engine failure) leading to the required level of structural strength.
  • B737-800 FTD System Failures

    B737-800 FTD System Failures

    IOS B737 FTD System Failures 0 Welcome The information contained within this document is believed to be accurate at the time of publication. However, it is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Multi Pilot Simulations (MPS). Multi Pilot Simulations assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document. Boeing, Boeing 737 and Boeing 737NG are registered trademarks of Boeing Company. Airbus, Airbus A320 are registered trademarks of Airbus. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved. No rights or claims can be derived from data in this document. WELCOME-1 FSTD: B737 FTD 1 Index Applicability: - Failures marked with a @-sign in the failure title are available on FNPT II/MCC and FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs - Failures without a @-sign are available on FTD1/FTD2 FSTDs only 0 WELCOME .................................................................................................................................. 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 1 DOCUMENT OWNER ....................................................................................................................................... 1 REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INDEX ...................................................................................................................................
  • Uncontrolled Descent and Collision with Terrain, United Airlines 585

    Uncontrolled Descent and Collision with Terrain, United Airlines 585

    PB2001-910401 NTSB/AAR-01/01 DCA91MA023 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 5498C Aircraft Accident Report Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 RAN S P T O L R A T LURIBUS N P UNUM A E O T I I O T N A N S A D FE R NTSB/AAR-01/01 T Y B OA PB2001-910401 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 5498C 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted March 27, 2001 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2001. Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain, United Airlines Flight 585, Boeing 737-200, N999UA, 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado, Springs, Colorado, March 3, 1991. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-01/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This amended report explains the accident involving United Airlines flight 585, a Boeing 737-200, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain 4 miles south of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado Springs, Colorado, on March 3, 1991. Safety issues discussed in the report are the potential meterological hazards to airplanes in the area of Colorado Springs; 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; and the design of the main rudder power control unit servo valve. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety.
  • Britannia II. Finds Reported Under the Portable Antiquities Scheme

    Britannia II. Finds Reported Under the Portable Antiquities Scheme

    Britannia http://journals.cambridge.org/BRI Additional services for Britannia: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here II. Finds Reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme Sally Worrell and John Pearce Britannia / Volume 46 / November 2015, pp 355 - 381 DOI: 10.1017/S0068113X15000446, Published online: 08 September 2015 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0068113X15000446 How to cite this article: Sally Worrell and John Pearce (2015). II. Finds Reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme. Britannia, 46, pp 355-381 doi:10.1017/S0068113X15000446 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/BRI, IP address: 87.74.139.172 on 17 Oct 2015 II. Finds Reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme By SALLY WORRELL and JOHN PEARCE The Portable Antiquities Scheme was established in 1997 as an initiative to record archaeological objects found by members of the general public and was extended to the whole of England and Wales in 2003.1 Surveys of Roman period finds recorded by the PAS have been published in Britannia annually since 2004. This twelfth report gives an overview of the finds reported in 2014 and of their character and distribution and publishes significant individual artefacts recorded by Finds Liaison Officers in this year. OVERVIEW More than 50,000 metallic artefacts of Roman date were recorded on the PAS database in 2014. As in previous annual statistics, this figure includes objects to which a date is attributed spanning the late Iron Age to early Roman transition. Table 1 presents the numbers of artefacts of different categories recorded on the database by county, using older administrative boundaries for consistency with previous reports; counties are grouped by PAS region.
  • September 2016 ----- KVIEHD Programs Alpha Order All Broadcasts Page 1 of 8

    September 2016 ----- KVIEHD Programs Alpha Order All Broadcasts Page 1 of 8

    September 2016 ----- KVIEHD Programs Alpha Order All Broadcasts Page 1 of 8 Created 8/31/16. Occasionally, KVIE makes changes to its schedule that would cause some of the below information to change. Please visit kvie.org/schedule for the most up-to-date information. 9/11 Inside The Pentagon 9/6 8PM, 9/7 2PM, 9/11 Noon A Few Good Pie Places 9/16 10PM A Few Great Bakeries 9/9 10PM Age Reversed with Miranda Esmonde-White 9/1 11PM Almost There 9/27 11PM, 9/30 4AM America by the Numbers The New Deciders #201 9/7 10PM, 9/13 9PM, 9/26 5AM America's Heartland #822 9/7 7:30PM, 9/11 6:30PM #905 9/14 7:30PM, 9/18 6:30PM, 9/20 2:30AM #908 9/21 7:30PM, 9/27 2:30AM #914 9/28 7:30PM, 9/29 4PM America's Test Kitchen from Cook's Illustrated Spanish Chicken and Israeli Couscous #1605 9/5 1:30PM Italian with Ease #1616 9/10 1PM Pass The Pasta #1606 9/12 1:30PM French Pork Chops and Bisque #1617 9/17 1PM Chocolate-Caramel Layer Cake #1607 9/19 1:30PM Why Not Add Wine? #1608 9/26 1:30PM Antiques Roadshow Vintage Richmond #1727 9/5 8PM, 9/6 2PM, 9/9 8PM, 9/11 5AM Richmond, Hour One #1816 9/5 9PM, 9/6 3PM Richmond, Hour Two #1817 9/12 8PM, 9/13 2PM, 9/16 8PM, 9/18 5AM Richmond, Hour Three #1818 9/12 9PM, 9/13 3PM Vintage Boston #2025 9/19 8PM, 9/20 2PM, 9/21 3:30AM, 9/25 5AM Knoxville, Hour One #1819 9/19 9PM, 9/20 3PM, 9/21 4:30AM Politically Collect #1219 9/26 8PM, 9/27 2PM, 9/28 4:30AM, 9/30 8PM Vintage Pittsburgh #1627 9/26 9PM, 9/27 3PM, 9/28 3:30AM Art Auction 2016 - A Day at the Beach 9/25 6:30PM Art Auction 2016 - Animal Kingdom 9/24 6:30PM Art Auction
  • Uncovering the Truth in Foreign Aviation Disasters and Evaluating the Case

    Uncovering the Truth in Foreign Aviation Disasters and Evaluating the Case

    FIU Law Review Volume 10 Number 2 Article 14 Spring 2015 Sifting Through the Theories: Uncovering the Truth in Foreign Aviation Disasters and Evaluating the Case Steven C. Marks Podhurst Orseck, P.A Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/lawreview Part of the Other Law Commons Online ISSN: 2643-7759 Recommended Citation Steven C. Marks, Sifting Through the Theories: Uncovering the Truth in Foreign Aviation Disasters and Evaluating the Case, 10 FIU L. Rev. 571 (2015). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.10.2.14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Law Review by an authorized editor of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 11 - MARKS_FINAL_1.4.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 3/1/16 2:52 PM Sifting Through the Theories: Uncovering the Truth in Foreign Aviation Disasters and Evaluating the Case Steven C. Marks* I. INTRODUCTION A plaintiff’s path to resolution in foreign aviation disasters comes with unique challenges and pitfalls that even the most experienced litigator may not anticipate. Successfully litigating foreign aviation cases requires as much determination as it does specialized know-how and diligent preparation. Because of the extraordinary expense involved in financing an aviation case, it is imperative to analyze the cases from a bird’s-eye view to anticipate the challenges and avoid the all-too-common pitfalls ahead. This paper provides insight into how an aviation practitioner prepares and evaluates a foreign aviation case, and also provides a pre-trial road map to resolution.
  • Optimal Aircraft Control Upset Recovery with and Without Component Failures

    Optimal Aircraft Control Upset Recovery with and Without Component Failures

    Proceedings of the American Control Conference Anchorage, AK May 8-10.2002 Optimal Aircraft Control Upset Recovery With and Without Component Failures Dean W. Sparks Daniel D. Moerder Guidance and Control Branch NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 2368 1-2 199 1 Introduction 2 Vehicle Model The aircraft on which this study closely adapted from a 6- degree-of-freedom simulation of Langley Research Center’s This paper treats the problem of recovering sustainable non- now-retired 737-100 research aircraft, documented in [ 1,2]. descending (safe) flight in a transport aircraft after one or more of its control effectors fail. Such recovery can be a The model assumes constant mass, rotating spherical Earth, challenging goal for many transport aircraft currently in the and U.S 1976 standard atmosphere [3] with no winds. The operational fleet for two reasons. First, they have very little airframe dynamics are expressed in body axes, and vehicle redundancy in their means of generating control forces and attitude is propagated using quaternions. moments. These aircraft have, as primary control surfaces, The vehicle’s control effectors are rudder, flaps, horizon- a single rudder and pairwise elevators and ailerodspoiler tal stabilizer, elevator, ailerodspoiler, and right and left en- units that provide yaw, pitch, and roll moments with suffi- gines. The aerodynamic and thrust forces are represented cient bandwidth to be used in stabilizing and maneuvering as tabular functions of these variables, along with aerody- the airframe. Beyond this, throttling the engines can pro- namic angles and airspeed or Mach number and altitude. vide additional moments, but on a much slower time scale.
  • Flying the Navy's First Jets (Sierra Hotel)

    Flying the Navy's First Jets (Sierra Hotel)

    FLYING THE NAVY’S FIRST JETS (SIERRA HOTEL) By Steven Craig Reynolds As Told By Charles “Gil” Erb, Cdr. USN (Ret.) TABLE OF CONTENTS PROLOGUE .........................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: IN THE BEGINNING .................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2: THE SKY IS CALLING ................................................................9 CHAPTER 3: CABBIE ADVENTURES AT THE MISSION RANCH ...............11 CHAPTER 4: ARMY DAYS AS A PRE-AVIATION CADET .............................15 CHAPTER 5: ALEXANDRE NYEFSKY YARASLOVICH SLATOFFOVOICH (SLATS) ................................................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 6: THE RAT IN THE CAN .............................................................22 CHAPTER 7: BATHING BEAUTY BOBBY BROWN ......................................24 CHAPTER 8: A HECTIC THREE WEEKS AND THEN SOME ...................... 27 CHAPTER 9: GETTING HIS WINGS .............................................................30 CHAPTER 10: JET TRAINING .......................................................................36 CHAPTER 11: FIRST BORN ...........................................................................38 CHAPTER 12: A “NUGGET’S” FIRST NEAR-FATAL CARRIER EXPERIENCE........................................................................................39 CHAPTER 13: INVERTED IN THE DARK ....................................................42 CHAPTER 14: OSCAR’S FEET ........................................................................46