Human R I G H T S H O U S E Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human R I G H T S H O U S E Network HUMAN RIGHTS HOUSE NETWORK Annual Report 2004 OSLO MOSCOW WARSAW SARAJEVO BERGEN LONDON ZAGREB NAIROBI KAMPALA MINSK BAKU ISTANBUL BOGOTA ” g ) ARD) gue or ogram EL n r “ oun ) o f Y or n s Rights h (SHR h s Union s ´ Violence c r YLU r e s Association A VHRC) ´ ( s Labor Rights (APWR) y (CLRPL) ´ otection of (A or Rational BAKU w f Society Society erbaijan (ISHR) erbaija omen a Pr otection Lea en Center f erbaijan Human Humanitaria z Human Rights Association f L velopment Pr velopment (W Resea W Pr A Against omen Az Az “ De – De W Rights Center (AHRC) International Society Citiz Human Rights Centre s ʼ s ʼ ture h A) or the oject omen ONET) or oject e omen T ender W CTV) omen W ALA W w Pr s (FID hang (LAP) (HAR) er (RLP) lic Def ork (UW ee La Greenwatc Exc wy oss-Cultural Pub Victims (A Uganda La Cr Legal Aid Pr Netw reatment of Rehabilitation and Human Rights Network Uganda (HURINET) KAMP Association - Uganda T African Center f Refug Federation of International y e s s r n er visor w and OBI e wy ome Violenc W ture or La t and h International or c T Releas a Human Rights Commission Legal Center NAIR omen La gains eople Against y Federation of a olitical Prisone olitical P W Center f P en Resear K Coalition on Coalition Child Rights Ad p e g a shi r r n tne r A a P or the or f v Sapega Emerging Houses VIASN yna yna Belarusia r PEN-Cente w Initiative Belarusian ork Foundation MINSK Le Association of Journalists La Supolnast Center Ska . Belarusian Langu Belarusian Human Rights Center Rights Human F 2 r oup A UL s T ʼ w Cente w a or f oatian omen GREB Cr B.a.B.e ANB W Human Rights oatian L oatian ZA r BOGO Helsinki Committee C Human Rights Gr IST ship le 19 tic Ar x on Censor English PEN LONDON Inde n g n n t t t a y c or e a m e j u ojec o r r H orpse P olf Rafto k h s s i t d h Forum r eace Corps) Committe Thor g (Norwegian AFS Norw AFS cultural Learnin cultural Foundation i u dish Cultural P ar and Childre and ar Freds r Idenity P Idenity Human Rights K R BERGEN Foundation f W ur Egil Rafto House The K Inte Norwegian Afghanista Norwegian a r o f vin O o eg omen) z W Renesansa Zene Zenama omen to Human Rights in Rights Human Serb Civil Council (W SARAJEV Helsinki Committee Committee Helsinki Bosnia and Her and Bosnia s or W orm oup oup e and Without gue f s Gr led oup hiatric s' Mother w Center w Helsinki ork Gr otection of Gr v Lea Disab ontier vement Foundation Psyc International Independent Non-violence Fr Right of Child Human Rights Human Dignity Netw Mother's Rights Right to Lif Mosco Mo the Pr Soldier Mosco or Prison Ref MOSCO Kisele f Association of Russia lished Houses The Human Rights House Netw s hool urist l J W n " or oland f Estab "POLIS in P ARSA Internationa Associatio olish-Tibetan Graduates of Human Rights P oung Journalists' oung olish Section of the of Section olish W Y P Helsinki Committee Helsinki Foundation Commission of of Commission Human Rights Sc Friendship Association t c e j o s d r P .E.N. Tibet eople g o l a i D dish P n Committee OSLO Committee Foundation e ur or Health an Health or f s Human Right Human K or the Rights of The Norwegian Norwegian f n Norwegian P Burma Committee a Norwegian Helsinki N The Norwegian Council ork Secretariat Netw Contents Introduction 4 Human Rights House Network Secretariat, Oslo 5 Activities 5 10-year Anniversary Conference 7 Statement from the Human Rights House Network: Human rights defenders need stronger international support and protection 12 Administration 14 Established Human Rights Houses 16 Oslo 16 Moscow 18 Warsaw 20 Sarajevo 22 Bergen 24 London 26 Emerging Human Rights Houses 28 Zagreb 28 Nairobi 30 Kampala 32 Minsk 34 Baku 36 Istanbul 38 Bogota 39 Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. 3 Introduction Human rights activists are under attack. In many countries mendations was to provide immediate protection to human it is becoming increasingly dangerous to defend the rights rights defenders in urgent situations, by granting temporary of others and to speak up against oppressive regimes and visas to human rights defenders at grave risk or facilitating political opponents. The work puts them in positions of asylum procedures and temporary admission programmes. great personal and professional risk, including risk to their colleagues, family members and friends. In many parts of The statement adopted at the conference is an important the world, there is an increased strategic tool for the future work use of the law, the courts and in the Human Rights House local public platforms as a ‘‘We want governments to adopt Network. means to deter human rights defenders from carrying out their transparent, comprehensive, and Since the beginning in 1994, the activities and to restrain their verifiable policies to protect human main aim of the Human Rights work. This development worries House Network has been to us, and we have a responsibil- rights defenders, both in their own improve the work for human ity as human rights activist to countries and abroad.’’ rights. Human Rights Houses address the problem. enhance co-operation and col- laboration among organisations Hence, the Human Rights and strengthen solidarity among House Network marked its 10th Anniversary in 2004 with them. They make organisations more visible and put an international conference entitled human rights on the agenda. Activists Under Attack – Defending the Right to be a Human Rights Defender. Our hope was that the conference But most of all, a Human Rights House increases the secu- would be a small contribution to putting the protection of rity of human rights defenders and activists and provides human rights defenders higher on the agenda. By gathering a base from where they can pursue their goals more effi- human rights defenders from all over the world, as well as ciently and at less risk. intellectuals, artists, politicians, researchers, and others who share a common goal of strengthening the work for One person in Norway has played a major role in the human rights, we wanted to manifest the right to be a Human Rights House project from the beginning. It was human rights defender and discuss how to protect the right his idea to establish the first Human Rights House in Oslo, to be a human rights defender. and it was his initiative to establish the Human Rights House Network. He has provided funding and let us use The conference adopted a statement, with recommenda- the house in Urtegata 50 free of charge until we had to tions to governments on how to support and protect move to larger offices in 2004, and he has invested time human rights activists. Experience has shown that the most and effort as a board member of the Human Rights House effective protection measures are those that have collec- Foundation. Therefore, we would like to thank Knut Kloster tive implications and are driven by political will. Durable jr for nurturing the Human Rights House idea and provid- solutions rest on the political will of stakeholders and ing the human rights community in Norway with generous competent authorities at all levels. The international com- support for more than a decade. munity and donor community must uphold high human rights standards in all human development efforts and use the level of national protection afforded to those defending human rights as some development indicators. We want B. Løvvig the governments to adopt transparent, comprehensive, Maria Dahle Bård and verifiable policies to protect human rights defenders, Executive Director hoto: both in their own countries and abroad. One of the recom- Human Rights House Foundation P 4 The Human Rights House Network Secretariat, Oslo Activities addition, the Human Rights House Foundation (HRH), has had discussions with human rights defenders from a Human Rights Houses number of countries in 2004, including Colombia and Iran. A Human Rights House is a collaborative project of NGOs working together to promote human rights at home and Network abroad. A Human Rights House is also a physical structure The Human Rights House Foundation (HRH) is located in that houses a community of member organizations. The Oslo, Norway, and is the Secretariat of the Human Rights purpose is to: House Network. The Human Rights House Network is a • Enhance cooperation and joint activities by bringing forum of co-operation between independent Human Rights human rights groups together in one location (such Houses and its independent organisations. The network’s activities include the provision of free legal aid to shared ambition is to promote, protect and enhance human victims of human rights abuses, human rights schools rights. This is done through and training. • Save costs by sharing facilities, such as conference • establishing more Human Rights Houses rooms and a human rights documentation center • sharing of knowledge and experience within and • Make the member organizations more visible and between these Houses accessible at both national and international levels • carrying out joint projects in and between the Houses • Improve security of human rights defenders • distributing information about human rights violations • Host meetings, seminars and other events.
Recommended publications
  • Norske Selvbilder Og Norsk Utenrikspolitikk
    Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk Halvard Leira [red.] Axel Borchgrevink Nina Græger Arne Melchior Eli Stamnes Indra Øverland Norwegian Institute Norsk of International Utenrikspolitisk Affairs Institutt Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk 1 Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk Halvard Leira [red.] Axel Borchgrevink Nina Græger Arne Melchior Eli Stamnes Indra Øverland Norsk Norwegian Institute Utenrikspolitisk of International Institutt Affairs NUPI | APRIL 07 2 Forord Utgiver: NUPI Copyright: © Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt 2007 ISBN: 978-82-7002-157-4 Redaktør: Halvard Leira Tel.: 22 99 40 00 Fax: 22 36 21 82 E-post: [email protected] Internett: www.nupi.no Adresse: Postboks 8159 Dep. 0033 Oslo Besøksadresse: C.J. Hambros plass 2 Design: Ole Dahl-Gulliksen Omslagsbilde: Scanpix NUPI | APRIL 07 Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk 3 Innhold 5 Forord 7 Innledning 7 Utenrikspolitikk og selvbilder 9 Norske selvbilder 10 God samaritan og hjelp til selvhjelp – dominante selvbilder 11 Norge er en fredsnasjon 16 Norge er en bistandskjempe 20 Norge er FNs beste venn 22 Utenforskap eller multilateralitet? Selvbilder i motsetning 23 Handelspolitikken og WTO: Et tilfelle av tung schizofreni? 28 Norge er en ansvarlig ishavs-forvalter 32 Norge er sine venners venn, men seg selv nok 37 Konklusjon 39 Bibliografi NUPI | APRIL 07 4 Forord NUPI | APRIL 07 Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk 5 Forord Når vi med foreliggende publikasjon kan Denne publikasjonen ble planlagt før presentere et bredt bilde av norsk utenriks- sittende regjering kom til makten, og den politikk, kommer det som resultat både av er derfor ikke et svar på utenriksminister ytre inspirasjon, en lang intern prosess og Jonas Gahr Støres invitasjon til debatt,1 men en aktiv historisk hukommelse.
    [Show full text]
  • British Politics Review 01 2008A4.Indd
    British Politics Review Newsletter of the British Politics Society, Norway Volume 3, No. 1 Winter 2008 A different cup of tea: The European Union has become an inevitable part of British politics, yet it is a topic treated more as a necessary evil than a source of lively debate. © European Community, 2008 Still the awkward partner? 35 years of British EU membership unbound Jan Petersen: The case for Europe: lessons to learn Ian Bache: Below the radar: the quiet Europeanisation of British politics Bjørn Høyland: The Conservative Party in Europe: an open marriage Kristin M. Haugevik: The Europeanisation of British security and defence policy British Politics Society, Norway, established in June 2006, is politically neutral and has no collective agenda apart from raising the interest and knowledge of British politics among the informed Norwegian public. Board Members: Øivind Bratberg (President), Kristin M. Haugevik (Vice President), Atle L. Wold (Scholarly Responsible), John-Ivar S. Olsen (Secretary) Postal address: P.O. Box 6 Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, Norway ▪ E-mail: [email protected] ▪ Website: www.britishpoliticssociety.no. British Politics Review A different partnership? Volume 3, No. 1 Winter 2008 Thirty-fi ve years after Britain’s entry into the then European ISSN 1890-4505 Communities (EC), the relationship looks different from both sides of British Politics Review is a quarterly the Channel - yet some of the essential qualities of that relationship newsletter issued by the British Politics remain. This gives rise to rather different accounts of Britain in Europe Society, Norway. With contributions depending on the perspective of the observer. The present issue of British from academic and journalistic sour- ces, the British Politics Review is aimed Politics Review celebrates the anniversary of British membership at everyone with a general interest in and draws on a range of thematic contributions to illustrate the many political developments in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • “Norway Is a Peace Nation”
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives “Norway is a Peace Nation” Discursive Preconditions for the Norwegian Peace Engagement Policy Øystein Haga Skånland M.A.Thesis, Peace and Conflict Studies Faculty of Social Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 20th June, 2008 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Halvard Leira for his insightful feedback, suggestions, and encouraging comments. Without him keeping me on track and gently prodding me in the right direction, carrying out the analysis would undoubtedly have been an overwhelming task. I am also grateful to Iver B. Neumann, who has read through and given valuable comments on a draft in the finishing stages of the process. I would also like to thank Prof. Jeffrey T. Checkel for an excellent introduction to social constructivism in International Relations, Prof. Werner Christie Mathisen for his course on textual analysis, and Sunniva Engh for introducing me to Norwegian development aid history. You have all inspired me in the choice of perspective and object of study. Writing this thesis would not be possible without support and encouragement to overcome the many small and big challenges I have encountered. I am indebted to my fellow students, particularly Jonathan Amario and Ruben Røsler; my friends; and my parents. Last, but not least, Synnøve deserves my most heartfelt thanks for her patience and loving support. All the viewpoints presented, and all errors and inconsistencies, are solely my own responsibility. Øystein Haga Skånland Oslo, June 2008 iii Table of Content Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Peace Nation Takes up Arms a Peace Nation Takes up Arms
    Independent • International • Interdisciplinary PRIO PAPER 7 gate Hausmanns Address: Visiting NO Grønland, 9229 PO Box (PRIO) Oslo Institute Research Peace A Peace Nation Takes Up Arms A Peace Nation Takes Up Arms The Norwegian Engagement in Afghanistan - 0134 Oslo, Norway Oslo, 0134 The Norwegian Engagement in Afghanistan Visiting Address: Address: Visiting NO Grønland, 9229 PO Box (PRIO) Oslo Institute Research Peace War (CSCW) Civil of Study the for Centre The Norwegian government Minister of Foreign Affairs in This paper is part of a series was fully behind the Opera- the new government gave his that examines the strategies of tion Enduring Freedom first presentation on the Nor- four NATO members in Af- (OEF), the US-led war against wegian contribution to the ghanistan: The US, the UK, 7 gate Hausmanns the Taliban regime and Al parliament. The main justifi- Germany and Norway. Each - Qaeda initiated in October cation for the Norwegian case study first contextualizes Norway Oslo, 0134 2001. By late November the commitment was the same as their Afghanistan engagement government had offered Nor- that which had informed the in light of the broader foreign wegian military resources, in- country’s security policy since policy concerns of the country cluding Special Forces, F-16 the late 1940s: that full sup- concerned, and then focuses on the development and ad- jet fighters and one Hercules port to the United States and ISBN: 7 www.studio Studio Design: justment of military strategy C-130 transport aircraft with to NATO was essential for a 978 in relation to other compo- - personnel. There was no prec- reciprocal security guarantee.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights House Network
    HUMAN RIGHTS HOUSE NETWORK Annual Report 2002 OSLO MOSCOW WARSAW SARAJEVO BERGEN ZAGREB NAIROBI MINSK ISTANBUL TIRANA Map of the Human Rights House Network OSLO WARSAW MOSCOW SARAJEVO BERGEN The Norwegian Human Helsinki Foundation Russian Research The Human Rights The Rafto Human Rights House for Human Rights Center for Human Rights House in Sarajevo Rights House Urtegata 50, 0187 Oslo, 00-028 Warsaw, 4 Louchnikov Lane, Ante Fijamenga 14b, Menneskerettighetenes Norway ul. Bracka 18m. 62, doorway 3, suite 5, 71000 Sarajevo, plass 1, [email protected] Poland 103982 Moscow, Russia Bosnia and 5007 Bergen , Norway Tel: +47 23 30 11 00 tel/fax +48 22 8281008, tel +7 095 206-0923 Herzegovina Tel: +47 55 21 09 30 Fax: +47 23 30 11 01 8286996, 8269875, fax +7 095 206-8853 tel/fax: Fax: +47 55 21 09 39 e-mail: 8269650 e-mail: [email protected] + 387 33 230 267 / e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: Website: 387 33 230 811 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.rhrcenter.org Helsinki Foundation The Bureau of Amnesty International Norwegian Helsinki Soldiers' Mothers for Human Rights of the Western Norway Committee Committee Human Rights Serb Civic Council Section Independent Union Norwegian Tibet Helsinki Committee Human Rights in Poland of Professional NORDPAS Committee Network Group Journalists International Society Young Journalists' Non-violence Coalition of NGO's Norwegian for Health and Association International in BH Afghanistan Human Rights "POLIS" "IZLAZ" Committee Helsinki Committee for Polish-Tibetan Moscow
    [Show full text]
  • Varför Har Sverige Hittills Inte Haft En Kvinnlig Statsminister?
    Varför har Sverige hittills inte haft en kvinnlig statsminister? En jämförandestudie mellan Sverige, Norge samt Danmark kring betydelsen av hög utbildning och engagemang. Why Sweden haven’t yet had a women as prime minister? A comparative study between Sweden, Norway and Denmark on the meaning of higher education and commitment. Josefine Eriksson Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap __________________________________________________________ Statsvetenskap __________________________________________________________ Kandidatuppsats, 15 hp. __________________________________________________________ Handledare: Mette Marie Stähr Harder __________________________________________________________ Examinator: Mikael Granberg __________________________________________________________ Datum: 28/6-2021 __________________________________________________________ Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to investigate and compare party leaders in Sweden, Norway and Denmark based on Jenny Madestam's research on how party leaders are elected and see if demonstrated loyalty, previous assignments in politics and higher education are criterias that are more difficult for women to fulfill than it is for men and if it could then be one of many reasons that led to the fact that in Sweden there has not been a female prime minister so far. In Madestam's research it emerged that in Sweden's parties it was important with, among other things, these criteria when a new party leader was to be appointed, then it was discussed whether these criteria were more favorable for men than women as women have historically been more at home than men. Should have influenced how women had the opportunity to get involved politically and provided higher education. By examining whether the party leaders in question have first and foremost shown loyalty to their party in the form of a long-term commitment within the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 2005 Rafto Prize to Chechnyan Human Rights Advocat
    Press Release 2005 Rafto Prize to Chechnyan Human Rights Advocat Ms Lida Yusupova The Professor Thorolf Rafto Memorial Prize for 2005 is awarded to the Chechnyan lawyer and human rights advocate Ms Lida Yusupova, in recognition of her brave and unrelenting efforts to document human rights violations and act as a spokeswoman for the forgotten victims of the war in Chechnya. Ms Yusupova struggles to defend human dignity in a chaotic war situation and in a context where the working conditions and security of human rights advocates and journalists are increasingly compromised. This year’s Rafto Prize laureate, Ms Lida Yusupova (born on 15 September, 1961), has been Office Director in Grozny of the Russian human rights organisation Memorial. Ms Yusupova has been active in bringing forth lawsuits regarding human rights violations to Chechnyan courts. Memorial is one of very few such organisations that continue to operate in Chechnya. The incidents that Yusupova and her fellow co-workers in Memorial have documented are serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law by Russian federal and Chechen security forces, committed without fear of legal consequences: Extrajudicial killings, enforced "disappearances" of civilians, illegal arrests and torture. The war in Chechnya has persisted for the past seven years, resulting in a degree of destruction that is almost incomprehensible. The policies of the Russian government in Chechnya have resulted in a marginalisation of the more moderate Chechnyan groups that have pursued peaceful approaches to end the suffering of the population. Instead, the consequence of Russian policies has been to strengthen the position of extreme Islamist groups that resort to acts of terror and suicide bombings.
    [Show full text]
  • Fra FN Til NATO Norske Styrker Som Eksportvare?
    MILITÆRE STUDIER 6 FORSVARETS STABSSKOLE 2014 Fra FN til NATO Norske styrker som eksportvare? Petter Bjørgo Forsvarets stabsskole (FSTS) Akershus festning, bygning 10, Postbok 1550 sentrum, 0015 Oslo, Norge Forsvarets stabsskole er en del av Forsvarets høgskole (FHS). Som faglig uavhen- gig høgskole utøver FHS sin virksomhet i overensstemmelse med anerkjente vitenskapelige, pedagogiske og etiske prinsipper (jf. Lov om universiteter og høgskoler § 1–5). Sjef Forsvarets stabsskole: kommandør Tom Egil Lilletvedt Militære studier er en militærfaglig tidsskriftserie innenfor Forsvarets stabsskoles ulike fagområder. Alle synspunkter, vurderinger og konklusjoner som fremkom- mer i denne publikasjonen står for forfatterens egen regning. Hel eller delvis gjengivelse av innholdet kan bare skje med forfatterens samtykke. Redaktør: oberstløytnant Tormod Heier Redaksjonskomité: oberst Gjert Lage Dyndal (PhD), kommandør Tom Egil Lilletvedt, kommandørkaptein Johan Bergh, kommandørkaptein Kåre Birger Grebstad, oberstløytnant Tormod Heier (PhD) Norwegian Defence Command and Staff College Akershus festning, bygning 10, Postbok 1550 sentrum, 0015 Oslo, Norway The Norwegian Defence Command and Staff College is part of the Norwegian Defence University College (FHS). As an independent university college, FHS conducts its professional activities in accordance with recognized scientific, pedagogical and ethical principles (pursuant to the Act pertaining to Universities and University Colleges, section 1–5). Chief Norwegian Defence Command and Staff College: Captain N Tom Egil Lilletvedt Militære studier is an independent military journal attached to the Norwegian Defence Command and Staff College’s broad portfolio of professional interests. All views, assessments and conclusions which appear in this publication are the author’s own. The author’s permission is required for any reproduction, wholly or in part, of the contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Authority and Status in International Relations: Good States and the Social Dimension of Status Seeking William C
    Review of International Studies, Vol. 44, part 3, pp. 526–546. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000560 © British International Studies Association 2017. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. First published online 5 December 2017 . Moral authority and status in International Relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking William C. Wohlforth Daniel Webster Professor, Dartmouth College Benjamin de Carvalho Senior Research Fellow, NUPI https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Halvard Leira* Senior Research Fellow, NUPI Iver B. Neumann Research Professor, NUPI Abstract We develop scholarship on status in international politics by focusing on the social dimension of small and middle power status politics. This vantage opens a new window on the widely-discussed strategies social actors may use to maintain and enhance their status, showing how social creativity, mobility, and competition can all be system-supporting under some conditions. We extract lessons for other thorny issues in status research, notably questions concerning when, if ever, status is a good , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at in itself; whether it must be a positional good; and how states measure it. Keywords Status; Foreign Policy, Small and Middle Powers; Moral Authority; Good States; Norway 26 Sep 2021 at 09:52:12 , on Introduction ‘While there is considerable agreement within the political science discipline and foreign 170.106.202.8 policy community that status matters in world affairs’, Jonathan Renshon writes, ‘the depth of our understanding has lagged far behind our confidence.’1 Part of the problem concerns the methodological challenges Renshon has in mind, but part has to do with an unwarranted focus .
    [Show full text]
  • SMITA NARULA 78 North Broadway, White Plains, New York 10603, [email protected]
    SMITA NARULA 78 North Broadway, White Plains, New York 10603, [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS ELISABETH HAUB SCHOOL OF LAW AT PACE UNIVERSITY White Plains, NY Haub Distinguished Professor of International Law Sept. 2018 - present ▪ Appointed in 2018 as the inaugural Distinguished Haub Chair in International Law to teach in the law school’s internationally renowned and top-ranked environmental law program. ▪ Courses: International Environmental Law; Environmental Justice; Human Rights & the Environment; Property Law. Committees: Appointments Committee; Admissions Committee; Nominating Committee; Environmental Law Program. Research interests: International Human Rights Law; Food Sovereignty & the Right to Food; Indigenous Peoples’ Rights; Environmental Movements; Sustainable Development Goals. Faculty Advisor: Pace International Law Review. ▪ Appointed Co-Director of the Global Center for Environmental Legal Studies in July 2019. Coordinate and supervise Haub Law students’ efforts to draft, submit, appeal and negotiate motions on international environmental law subjects for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s World Conservation Congress. HUNTER COLLEGE – CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK New York, NY Distinguished Lecturer & Interim Director 2017 – 2018 Human Rights Program, Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute ▪ Directed interdisciplinary program in human rights for undergraduate students and provided strategic direction for relevant academic, public outreach, and programming efforts. Fostered human rights
    [Show full text]
  • Human R I G H Ts H O U S E Network
    HUMAN RIGHTS HOUSE NETWORK Annual Report 2003 OSLO MOSCOW WARSAW SARAJEVO BERGEN ZAGREB NAIROBI MINSK ISTANBUL BAKU LONDON KAMPALA BAKU KAMPALA ISTANBUL Article 19 English PEN LONDON Index on Censorship for the the for VIASNA VIASNA Belarusian Belarusian PEN-Center Belarusian Foundation MINSK Lev Sapega Association of Journalists Law Initiative Supolnast Center Belarusian Language Language Belarusian Human Rights Center Center Rights Human F. Skaryna Partnership Partnership Skaryna F. 2 for B.a.B.e Croatian Womenís Womenís Human Rights ZAGREB Emerging Houses Croatian Law Center Law Croatian Helsinki Committee Human Rights Group and Torture Release Release Commission Legal Center NAIROBI Federation of against Women against People Against Women Lawyers Women Center for Law and Political Prisoners Political Research International Kenya Human Rights Coalition on Violence Violence on Coalition Child Rights Advisory Norwegian Committee Committee Church Aid (Norwegian AFS Norway AFS Foundation Peace Corps) Fredskorpset Idenity Project Project Idenity BERGEN War and Children and War Egil Rafto House International Exchange International Norwegian Afghanistan Norwegian of of Journalists Renesansa Professional Professional Zene Zenama Human Rights in in Rights Human Serb Civil Council Independent Union Union Independent (Women to Women) (Women SARAJEVO Helsinki Committee for for Committee Helsinki Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosnia of of Group Convicted Convicted Foundation Psychiatric International Independent Non-violence Frontiers Group Right
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY from 1955-2005.Pdf
    NATO Parliamentary Assembly 1955-2005 NATO Parliamentary Assembly 1955-2005 This book was produced with the generous assistance of the 50 Years parliaments of Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia, and Turkey. of Parliamentary Diplomacy Editor’s Note n 2004 the Assembly’s Standing Committee decided to There may be slight inconsistencies between articles. I commemorate the Assembly’s 50th anniversary. It was However, as we have aimed for articles based on personal rec- decided to hold a special plenary sitting during the 50th annual ollections, we have not attempted to reconcile occasional dif- session. To that end, during that session, which took place in ferences or discrepancies. Our goal was to retain the original Venice, a special meeting was held involving, for the first time, spontaneity of the authors’ perceptions and memories. the permanent representatives to the North Atlantic Council. This was an outstanding success, as a record number of session As with so many projects of this kind, the book has evolved participants – over a thousand – clearly showed. and become more substantial than was first envisaged. Contributions were generally longer than anticipated and as The Standing Committee also decided that the Assembly we began to see a whole picture of the project emerging, it should produce a commemorative book as an enduring way of became clear that it would merit a more visually appealing marking this important milestone in the Assembly’s history. and enduring format than was foreseen at the outset. This The volume should cover the entire span of the Assembly’s exis- had obvious financial implications, but several delegations tence, but focus specifically on the Assembly’s role from the end came forward with generous offers of assistance.
    [Show full text]