From the Early Settlements to Reconstruction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the Early Settlements to Reconstruction The Laird Rams: Warships in Transition 1862-1885 Submitted by Andrew Ramsey English, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Maritime History, April 2016. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) Andrew Ramsey English (signed electronically) 1 ABSTRACT The Laird rams, built from 1862-1865, reflected concepts of naval power in transition from the broadside of multiple guns, to the rotating turret with only a few very heavy pieces of ordnance. These two ironclads were experiments built around the two new offensive concepts for armoured warships at that time: the ram and the turret. These sister armourclads were a collection of innovative designs and compromises packed into smaller spaces. A result of the design leap forward was they suffered from too much, too soon, in too limited a hull area. The turret ships were designed and built rapidly for a Confederate Navy desperate for effective warships. As a result of this urgency, the pair of twin turreted armoured rams began as experimental warships and continued in that mode for the next thirty five years. They were armoured ships built in secrecy, then floated on the Mersey under the gaze of international scrutiny and suddenly purchased by Britain to avoid a war with the United States. Once purchased, they were largely forgotten. Historians rarely mention these two sister ironclads and if mentioned at all, they are given short shrift. Built with funds obtained in part through the Confederate Erlanger loan, these ironclads were constructed at Lairds shipyard in Birkenhead and represented an advanced concept of ironclad construction through new proposals involving turrets, the ram, heavy guns and tripod masts on an armoured ship, as advocated by Captain Cowper Coles, R.N. They proved too much of a leap in one design but when their roles caught up to the revised designs, the ships were modified to meet new requirements. After several mission and design changes they then performed to standard. This belated success occurred when the concept of the ideal armoured warship was in flux throughout the middle Victorian years. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I must thank my first supervisor Professor Jeremy Black for his support, suggestions and editing advice for this thesis. His encouragement and patience with my misspelled words, rewrites, and changes have been an essential part of my efforts to hammer the myriad of official reports, journal notes, newspaper accounts, ships log entries, etc. into an account of these overlooked defenders of the Empire. I am grateful to other facility members of the University of Exeter for their support including Dr. Nicholas Terry and Dr. Roger Morriss for their kind and patient editing advice, Dr. Laura Rowe for her support during my presentation on the Laird rams given at the ‗Nautical Lives Conference‘, at the University of Exeter on 25 January 2014, my second supervisor Dr. Marc-William Palen for his encouragement, and my mentor Dr. Matthias Reiss for his guidance. I also appreciate the support and editing advice given by Dr. Howard J. Fuller of the University of Wolverhampton, who kindly sat on my August 2016 exam board with Dr. Morriss. Their advice, suggestions, and reinforcement made a tremendous difference. I would also like to thank Francesca Anyon, Martin Cleaver, Julia Homes, and William Meredith of the Wirral Archives in Birkenhead who patiently unearthed a treasure of records from the construction of the Laird rams to greatly aid my research. Andrew Choong Han Lin, Curator, Historic Photographs & Ships Plans, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, went above and beyond to provide the detailed plans of the extensive refit carried out on the second Laird ram circa 1878-1880, as well as related photographs and illustrations of the two ships. Ellen Jane Hollis of the Bermuda National Library provided very useful information and newspaper accounts of the Royal Navy on the North American and West Indian Station from the 1850s-1900s. I must thank staff at the RAF 3 Alconbury Base Library, Paul Charman, Patricia Hinkle, Mari Mayer and Annette Short, as well as Stacy Compton, and Daniel Holley of the Education Office on the same Royal Air Force Station, for providing invaluable service, both in terms of computer access, and library loan materials which proved essential for this thesis. Saving the best for last, my wife Sara, who ‗learned more about ironclads than I ever wanted to know‘, deserves my eternal thanks for her support, encouragement, and advice. 4 Table of Contents 1. Introduction: The Laird Rams and the evolution of the ironclad warship, p. 7 2. Chapter One: Industry and Innovation: Building the Laird Rams 1862-1863, p. 30 3. Chapter Two: Reluctant Actions: Seizure and Acquisition of the Laird Ironclads 1863-1864, p. 104 4. Chapter Three: Technological Advances and Failings: The Laird Rams in Service 1865-1880, p. 194 Illustrations, p. 281 5. Chapter Four: Naval Weapons and Power Projection: The Laird Rams on Foreign Station 1874-1883, p. 292 6. Chapter Five: Imperial Competition and Strategic Change: The Laird Rams 1883-1885, p. 363 7. Conclusion, p. 410 8. Glossary of terms, p. 416 9. Bibliography, p. 418 5 Illustrations 1. Birkenhead Iron Works (1857) 2. Dry Dock No. 4, Cammell Laird, 2015 3. Armour Plate Rolling Mill, Mersey Ironworks, Liverpool 1863 4. Marine Trunk Steam Engine likely at Lairds (circa 1865) 5. John Laird, 1861 6. The ‗294 and ‗295‘ in the Mersey, 1863 7. H.M.S. SCORPION at Sea, 1869 8. H.M.S. WIVERN at Plymouth, 1865, NH# 52526 (Public Domain) 9. H.M.S. WIVERN off Plymouth, 1865, NH# 71211 (Public Domain) 10. H.M.S. WIVERN in the Channel, 1866 11. Coles Turret with RML 12. H.M.S. ROYAL SOVEREIGN and H.M.S. SCORPION off Dover 1869 13. Nordenfelt gun, circa 1880 14. A refitted H.M.S. WIVERN at Portsmouth, 1880, NH# 65901 (Public Domain) 15. ‗Fresh Paint‘, 1885 16. A refitted H.M.S. SCORPION at Bermuda, circa 1900 17. The hulk of the WIVERN departs Hong Kong for the breakers, 13 March 1923 6 INTRODUCTION The Laird Rams and the evolution of the ironclad warship The two ironclad sister ships built by Lairds shipbuilders of Birkenhead during the American Civil War, have been largely overshadowed by another ship built by Lairds, the famous raider C.S.S. Alabama. Constructed after the equally famous H.M.S. Warrior and predating the ill-fated H.M.S. Captain (also a Lairds ship), the Confederate-intended Birkenhead ironclads were built in response to the combat proven monitors of the Union fleet, yet were more capable of an ocean going role (at least for coastal warfare) than the low-hulled Union turret warships. As they were nearing completion, the rams became the focus of intelligence gathering and diplomatic manoeuvre which ended when the two Birkenhead-built turret ships were acquired by a reluctant government in Whitehall. The move proved fortunate. They were built in time to provide Britain with an extra edge against potential rivals as larger British broadside ironclads were nearing completion. Yet, advances in naval gun manufacture led one observer to note: ‗The ship may be cased with armor [sic] which today is shot-proof; but tomorrow it may be pierced with ease by shot or shell thrown by some new iron monster‘.1 More than just the new guns, the British press warned that a new projectile would make ironclads like the celebrated Warrior and her sister the Black Prince obsolete ‗and then our ironsides will take their place with Brown Bess among a class of antiquities which will be pronounced rusty‘.2 With proper forging techniques, bigger guns could be crafted in the iron makers‘ workshops (both smoothbore and rifle) capable of firing a larger powder charge which could propel a larger projectile at increased 1 James Phinney Baxter III, The Introduction of the Ironclad Warship. (Originally published Cambridge, MA, 1933, Annapolis, 2001), 204. 7 velocity and range.3 Jules Verne would write (in 1863) of the ‗absurd duel between armour and cannonballs, as to which would resist and which would penetrate‘. Verne predicted that the cannonballs (and shells) would triumph in this contest he called ‗a noble rivalry‘.4 Displayed at Woolwich Arsenal is an armoured target from that era before steel, when iron was supreme. Here was a testament to the transition from the primacy of iron plates to the heavy gun as the ultimate factor in naval warfare. The shield was some 12 inches thick, originally cast in two separate plates, and fitted one below and one above to create a single gunport at the centre. The gunport was the obvious aim point for a range test circa 1868. The thick armour was not penetrated, but it was noticeably cracked and scalloped in appearance. The impact from shells and balls distorted the shield, giving the target an appearance more granular, not unlike wet clay. The armour was not dented much, but in some places it looked as though it had been scooped out, as if by hand. The iron was able to keep the shells out…but, barely. This target, in a way, represents the dilemma faced by naval architects and navies of that era. The experts did not know when the continuous experimentation and exasperating drive to outdo the latest advance in armoured construction and competing gunnery progress would end.
Recommended publications
  • Reliques of the Anglo-Saxon Churches of St. Bridget and St. Hildeburga, West Kirby, Cheshire
    RELIQUES OF THE ANGLO-SAXON CHURCHES OF ST. BRIDGET AND ST. HILDEBURGA, WEST KIRKBY, CHESHIRE. By Henry Ecroyd Smith. (BEAD IST DEOBMBEB, 1870.) THE Parish of West Kirkby (now West Kirby), lying 18 miles N.W. of Chester city, is one of the most important in the hundred of Wirral, and occupies the whole of its north­ western angle. Dr. Ormerod describes its first quarter as comprising the townships of West Kirkby and Newton-cum- Larton, with that of Grange, Great Caldey or Caldey Grange ; second, the townships of Frankby and Greasby ; third, those of Great and Little Meols, with Hoose ; fourth, the township of Little Caldey.* Originally Kirklye, or, settlement at the Church, it became " West Kirkby," to distinguish it from "Kirkby-in-Walley," at the opposite corner of the peninsula of Wirral, now com­ monly known as Wallasey. Each of these extensive parishes possessed two Churches, those of Wallasey lying the one in Kirkby-in-Walley, the other on the Leasowes and near the sea, which ultimately destroyed it and engulphed the site together with that of its burial-ground. For further informa­ tion on this head, Bishop Gastrell's " Notitia," Dr. Ormerod's " History of the County,"\ and Lyson's " Cheshire,"% may be consulted. Gastrell's Notitia. The last now simply bears the name of Caldy. t II, 360. Heading of Moretou. { Page 807. 14 The Churches of West Kirkby were situate, the parish Church at the town proper, the other, a Chapel of Ease, upon Saint Hildeburgh's Eye, i.e., the island of St. Hildeburga, which had become insulated through the same potent influence which had wrecked the Chapel, as Bishop Gastrell calls it, upon the Leasowe shore.
    [Show full text]
  • International Military Cartridge Rifles and Bayonets
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY CARTRIDGE RIFLES AND BAYONETS The following table lists the most common international military rifles, their chambering, along with the most common bayonet types used with each. This list is not exhaustive, but is intended as a quick reference that covers the types most commonly encountered by today’s collectors. A Note Regarding Nomenclature: The blade configuration is listed, in parentheses, following the type. There is no precise dividing line between what blade length constitutes a knife bayonet vs. a sword bayonet. Blades 10-inches or shorter are typically considered knife bayonets. Blades over 12-inches are typically considered sword bayonets. Within the 10-12 inch range, terms are not consistently applied. For purposes of this chart, I have designated any blade over 12 inches as a sword bayonet. Country Rifle Cartridge Bayonet (type) Argentina M1879 Remington 11.15 x 58R Spanish M1879 (sword) Rolling-Block M1888 Commission 8 x 57 mm. M1871 (sword) Rifle M1871/84 (knife) M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1891 (sword) M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. None Cavalry Carbine M1891 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1891/22 (knife) Engineer Carbine [modified M1879] M1891/22 (knife) [new made] M1909 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1909 First Pattern (sword) M1909 Second Pattern (sword) M1909/47 (sword) M1909 Mauser 7.65 x 53 mm. M1909 Second Cavalry Carbine Pattern (sword) M1909/47 (sword) FN Model 1949 7.65 x 53 mm. FN Model 1949 (knife) FN-FAL 7.62 mm. NATO FAL Type A (knife) FAL Type C (socket) © Ralph E. Cobb 2007 all rights reserved Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • OMNI Magazine Interview, July 1992)
    ALIEN CITY ON MARS? TiTil W i^ -A Im; SCENES Lji U *' Ul EDITOR IN CHIEF & DESIGN DIRECTOR: BOB GUCCIONE PRESIDENT a C.O.O.: KATHY KEETON VP/EDITOR' KEITH FERRELL EXECUTIVE VP/GBAPHICS DIRECTOR- FRANK DEVINO MANAGING EDITOR: CAROLINE DARK ART DIRECTOR: CATHRYN MEZZO First Word Continuum By Dana Rohrabacher 42 Fighting for Opening the X-Files U.S. patent rights By David Bischoff S Mulder and Scully know Communications something is m out there—and so do their Funds many fans. A behind- By Linda Marsa the-scenes lool< at this fas- Cashing in on collectibles cinating and m increasingly popular Electronic Universe new show. By Grsgg Keizer ArchiTreIc Medicine Designing Generations By Anita Bartholomew By Herman Zimmerman m and Philip Thomas Edgerly .Sounds Boldly going where By Steve Nadis few. production designers Sounds of the silent have gone before: 22 designing the Star Trek Eanii By Melanie Menagh Choices Fiction: S.4 Dying Virtual Realities [Vlichael IVlarshall Smith By Tom Dworetzl<y 7^ 23 Cartoon Feature Artificial Intelligence . By Steve Nadis Interview: 32 Richard hioa gland Mind By Steve Nadis By Steve Nadis A close-up lool< at the Hallucinations, man behind delusions, the face on Mars and schizophrenia SS 33 Tsuneo Sanda's cover painting, On Patrol, made possible by Antimatter the PI" I p Edge ly Age cy n a'^sar qt on witi ZD^sgn Copyrght Pa amount PcturesCorporaticn Games (Additional art rred t"^ page 110) By bi, iff Morris SR1''6ril7'iBn FIRST UUORD INVENTING AMERICA: Patent laws and the protection of individual rights By Dana Rohrabacher merica's greatest asset side.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Information Archivée Dans Le
    Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page. Information archivée dans le Web Information archivée dans le Web à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Cette dernière n’a aucunement été modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date de mise en archive. Les pages archivées dans le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes qui s’appliquent aux sites Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez demander de recevoir cette information dans tout autre format de rechange à la page « Contactez-nous ». CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE / COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES CSC 28 / CCEM 28 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES (MDS) THESIS THE CORVETTE - A SHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY CANADIAN NAVY LA CORVETTE - UN NAVIRE POUR LA MARINE CANADIENNE DU 21E SIÈCLE By/par LCdr/capc Pierre Bédard This paper was written by a student attending La présente étude a été rédigée par un stagiaire the Canadian Forces College in fulfilment of one du Collège des Forces canadiennes pour of the requirements of the Course of Studies. satisfaire à l'une des exigences du cours. The paper is a scholastic document, and thus L'étude est un document qui se rapporte au contains facts and opinions, which the author cours et contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and correct for que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Cernia, Sheep.O~:: -6Mie- Mouton
    CASE REPORT Isolation of Haemophilus agni from Six Alberta Ram Lambs with Septicemia M. Sharon Lundberg Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Necropsy was performed within Alberta Agriculture, Post Bag No. 1, R6sum6 24 hours ofdeath on animals 1,4, 5 and Airdrie, Alberta TOM OBO t _ 6. Lambs 2 and 3 were submitted live -Six do ad_ a. and euthanized at the laboratory. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... ... ... ... .. :....:.. .. }: :: .:: ..: .: ..: *Sf.re..a s. so. .abora- Necropsy Findings .Sx. ramlambs.were s itted to a,.. t de dia pour Lamb 1 had no visible lesions. Animal ..".dv . X iZ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. veernay dagnoticlaoraoryfo n6cropsie nprs one mort sobite ou une 2 had turbid synovial fluid and the illnssodahwitorwshouo jorve o.u non ventral portions of the meninges had a : : ..ag_ ...a...c.. de idepdifficu6&miriher de cloudy fibrinous appearance. Lamb 3 depressio... ..o neQ to oe.,.scour diarrh6e et de filre. Les l6uios umacro- .r fever. Gims findings an bhiit&" had congestion of the spleen and lungs. scopiques et hislog rtvrent The fourth lamb had excess serous peri- .. .. .. .. .. .. ~~~~~~.. .... ..... ... l'vidence d' sepe. On isola and : cardial fluid. ... : : :.:.. : pleural :: Hemorrhages |.. } r ~~~~was 'O# Hamokiu.::. agi & paui do cerveau, des"oumon'delaratetdeagin^._b..&~~~~~~~~~~~.....k.... were present on the serosal surface of lymphatiques. the abomasum and intestine serosa, over ... the capsule of mesenteric lymph nodes, :Ky wiords:H u ilwq epti- Mots::: H 1emoph ap, septi- and spleen, and over epicardial and cernia, sheep.o~:: -6mie- mouton. endorcardial surfaces. The lymph nodes and spleen were Introduction enlarged and the lungs and meninges Haemophilus agni is a small, This paper describes six cases of congested.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVERPOOL. PUB 173 Grapes, Mrs
    DIRECTORY.] LIVERPOOL. PUB 173 Grapes, Mrs. Jane Glamann, 3 Fox street Halfway House, Joseph Nicholson, 23 Harper street, & 82 Grapes,Sl.Grayson, ISrBeaufort st.&44 Warwickst.Toxtth.pk Erskine street, Low hill Grapes, William Harken, 58 & 6o Lodge lane Halfway House, Geo. Taylor Orme,Woodchurch rd. Oxton, B Grapes inn, George Mars Hayward, 76 Allerton rd. Woolton Halfway House,Geo.Radley,74 Crown st. & 208 Brownlow hi Grapes, J. Heritage, 2 Reynolds st. & 3 Severs st. Everton Halfway House, William Ratcliffe, Woolton rd. Wavertree Grapes, Thomas Hillman, I5 Norfolk street Halfway House, Geo. Smith, 221 Westminster rd. Kirkdale Grapes, William Howard, 277 West Derby road Halton Castle hotel, Duncan McLaren, 42 Mill la. We. Derby Grapes, Richard Ruck, 102 Wood street Hamilton Arms, Alfred Bannister, 2 & 4 Downing street & Grapes, Joseph Jones, 69 & 71 Brownlow hill 43 Hamilton road, Everton Grapes inn, Archibald McWilliam, 59 Park st. Toxteth park Hamlet inn, Mrs. Margaret Simms, 20 Chester street, B Grapes, Richard Miller, 86 Hill street, Toxteth park Hamlet hotel, J. Sullivan, I Kirkdale rd. & 249 Boundary st Grapes, William Edwards Miller, n8 Stanley road, Kirkdale Happy Valley, Isaac Arthur, 348 Boro' road, B Grapes, Thomas H. Moore, So Myrtle street Harcourt, Joseph G. Richardson, 38 Harcourt st. Kirkdale Grapes, James Murphy, I Harford street Hare & Hounds hotel,Mrs.Jane Clark,9TheVillage, We. Derby Grapes, Mrs. Mary Negros, 45 Park lane Hare & Hounds, James Edward Pooley, 6 Commutation row Grapes, Nathan Parker, 22 Gerard street Harewood hotel, John Bilton, 54 Harewood street, Everton Grapes, J.F. Penquitt, nLorton st. Toxtth.pk. &Buttermere st Harlech Castle, Edward Gough, 63 County road, Walton Grapes, Frederick Edmund Pike, 42 Marybone Harrington Arms, John Lewis, 7 Lodge la.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ARMAMENTS FIRMS, THE STATE PROCUREMENT SYSTEM, AND THE NAVAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN EDWARDIAN BRITAIN Professor Roger Lloyd-Jones History Department, Sheffield Hallam University Dr. Myrddin John Lewis History Department, Sheffield Hallam University This article examines the relationship between Britain’s armament firms and the state’s procurement system, presenting a case for a Naval Industrial Complex (NIC) in the years immediately before the Great War. It argues that in Edwardian Britain a nuanced set of institutional networks were established between the Admiralty and a small elite group of armament manufacturers. The NIC demonstrates the close collaboration between the armament firms supplying the Admiralty and between the Admiralty and an elite group of private contractors. This article concludes that the NIC did not lead to profiteering by contactors, and they did supply the warships and naval ordnance that enabled Britain to out build Germany in the naval race. This paper examines the relationship in Britain between the armaments industry and the military institutions of the state during the years preceding the Great War, when there were intensifying international tensions, and concerns over Britain’s defense capabilities. Through an assessment of the War Office (WO) and Admiralty procurement system, we apply John Kenneth Galbraith’s theory that businesses may establish institutional networks as “countervailing powers” to mediate business-state relations and, thus, we challenge the proposition that the state acted as a “monopsonist,” dominating contractual relations with private armaments firms.’ We argue that during the years prior to the war, Britain’s Naval Industrial Complex (MC) involved a strengthening collaboration between the British Admiralty and the big armament firms.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems Undertakings Review: Advice to the Secretary of State
    %$(6\VWHPV 8QGHUWDNLQJV5HYLHZ $GYLFHWRWKH6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH 1May © Crown copyright 2017 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Website: www.gov.uk/cma Members of the Competition and Markets Authority who conducted this inquiry John Wotton (Chair of the Group) Rosalind Hedley-Miller Jayne Scott Acting Chief Executive of the Competition and Markets Authority Andrea Coscelli The Competition and Markets Authority has excluded from this published version of the report information which the inquiry group considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (specified information: considerations relevant to disclosure). The omissions are indicated by []. Contents Page Executive summary and advice .................................................................................. 3 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................... 3 BAES .................................................................................................................... 4 Changes of circumstances .................................................................................... 5 Use of the Undertakings ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Wood, Christopher Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Original Citation Wood, Christopher (2013) Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/19501/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Were the developments in 19th century small
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Odyssey: the George W
    ASAC_Vol98_02-Jones_080006.qxp 2/13/09 12:05 PM Page 18 98/18 Reprinted from the American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin 98:18-30 Additional articles available at http://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/resources/articles/ ASAC_Vol98_02-Jones_080006.qxp 2/13/09 12:05 PM Page 19 Confederate Odyssey: The George W. Wray Jr. Collection at the Atlanta History Center By Gordon L. Jones Photos by Jack W. Melton, Jr. He was a very private man who lived in an ordinary house in suburban Atlanta. He loved his family, friends, and the University of North Carolina Tar Heels. But his real pas- sion was Confederate history. He was George W. Wray Jr., well-known for his keen eye for detail, encyclopedic knowledge of weaponry, and penchant for making a bargain. Beginning at the age of twelve in 1948, Wray spent the next fifty-six years building a world-class collection of one thousand Confederate artifacts, including 184 longarms, virtually all known varieties of Confederate bayonets, seven rare Confederate artillery pieces, handguns, uniforms, headgear, flags, swords, knives, ammunition, and accoutrements. Along the way, he spent thousands of hours meticulously tracking down the original public through text, videos, and interactive exhibits, owners of attributed artifacts, building “womb to tomb” Turning Point is firmly rooted in artifacts and the stories biographies of their lives, complete with photographs and they tell—both individually and collectively. Perhaps more family histories. He filled up fourteen file boxes with arti- important still, the acquisition of the Wray Collection will cles, notes, and copies of all his research correspondence, greatly enhance our capacity to serve students, researchers, making his collection one of the best documented in the and collectors by providing an accessible and permanent ref- nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate
    OCTOBER 2020 The Cost of the Navy’s New Frigate On April 30, 2020, the Navy awarded Fincantieri Several factors support the Navy’s estimate: Marinette Marine a contract to build the Navy’s new sur- face combatant, a guided missile frigate long designated • The FFG(X) is based on a design that has been in as FFG(X).1 The contract guarantees that Fincantieri will production for many years. build the lead ship (the first ship designed for a class) and gives the Navy options to build as many as nine addi- • Little if any new technology is being developed for it. tional ships. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the potential costs if the Navy exercises • The contractor is an experienced builder of small all of those options. surface combatants. • CBO estimates the cost of the 10 FFG(X) ships • An independent estimate within the Department of would be $12.3 billion in 2020 (inflation-adjusted) Defense (DoD) was lower than the Navy’s estimate. dollars, about $1.2 billion per ship, on the basis of its own weight-based cost model. That amount is Other factors suggest the Navy’s estimate is too low: 40 percent more than the Navy’s estimate. • The costs of all surface combatants since 1970, as • The Navy estimates that the 10 ships would measured per thousand tons, were higher. cost $8.7 billion in 2020 dollars, an average of $870 million per ship. • Historically the Navy has almost always underestimated the cost of the lead ship, and a more • If the Navy’s estimate turns out to be accurate, expensive lead ship generally results in higher costs the FFG(X) would be the least expensive surface for the follow-on ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders, Medals and Decorations
    Orders, Medals and Decorations To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Lower Grosvenor Gallery The Aeolian Hall, Bloomfield Place New Bond Street London W1A 2AA Day of Sale: Thursday 1 December 2016 at 12.00 noon and 2.30 pm Public viewing: Nash House, St George Street, London W1S 2FQ Monday 28 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 29 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Wednesday 30 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Or by previous appointment. Catalogue no. 83 Price £15 Enquiries: Paul Wood, David Kirk or James Morton Cover illustrations: Lot 239 (front); lot 344 (back); lot 35 (inside front); lot 217 (inside back) Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd. in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd. and not to Sotheby’s. Online Bidding This auction can be viewed online at www.the-saleroom.com, www.numisbids.com and www.sixbid.com. Morton & Eden Ltd offers an online bidding service via www.the-saleroom.com. This is provided on the under- standing that Morton & Eden Ltd shall not be responsible for errors or failures to execute internet bids for reasons including but not limited to: i) a loss of internet connection by either party; ii) a breakdown or other problems with the online bidding software; iii) a breakdown or other problems with your computer, system or internet connec- tion.
    [Show full text]