Civil War Navy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Civil War Navy THE CIVIL WAR ON THE WATER BY SEQUOIA BELLANCA BACKGROUND INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF THE WAR ON THE WATER BACKGROUND INFORMATION SHIPS Sloop-of-war Riverboats and Ferries Schooners “Casemate” ironclads BACKGROUND INFORMATION SHIPS Double Enders Submarines Steam Frigates Air Craft Carriers BACKGROUND INFORMATION CIVIL WAR NAVAL ACTIONS • The Battle of Port Royal- November 7, 1861 • The Battles of Forts Henry and Donelson- February 6-16, 1862 • he Battle of Hampton Roads- March 8-9, 1862 • The Battle of Island No. 10- February 28-April 8, 1862 • The Capture of New Orleans- May 1, 1862 • The Battle of Drewry's Bluff- May 15, 1862 • The Battle of Fort Hindman/Arkansas Post- January 9-11, 1863 • The Vicksburg Campaign- December 1862-July 4, 1863 • The Siege of Charleston Harbor- July 19, 1863-September 7, 1863 • The Second Battle of Sabine Pass- September 8, 1863 • The H.L Hunley Sinks the USS Housatonic- February 17, 1864 • The Battle of Plymouth- April 17-20, 1864 • CSS Alabama vs. USS Kearsarge- June 19, 1864 • The Battle of Mobile Bay- August 5, 1864 • The Bahia Incident- October 7, 1864 • The Second Battle of Fort Fisher- January 13-15, 1865 • The Battle of Trent's Reach- January 23-25, 1865 • The Surrender of the CSS Shenandoah- November 6, 1865 • The Battle of Memphis- June 6, 1862 BACKGROUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES • STEAM: • -introduction of steam power • -Steam engines had existed before the nineteenth century, but Robert Fulton built the first steam-powered warship in 1815 for the US Navy • -better than sailing ships because there movement didn't have to rely on the wind for power and direction • -they were able to return upriver after transporting their goods then be able to continue on the journey with weak winds • -by 1850s, all new warships built by the navy were steam powered • - even though they didn't rely highly on the winds, they didn't move much faster and many ships had to use sails to preserve fuel on long trips • -looked like sailing ships, except for the smokestack coming from the deck • -served as blockade runners, transports, and cruisers • IMPROVED ARTILLERY: • -huge military developments lead to further change to the warships • -in 1850s there were many alterations in the construction of cannons and allowed the military to build bigger, more accurate, and longer-ranged guns. • -John Dahlgren: a naval officer who developed a technique for reinforcing the breach of a cannon to better withstand the extra gunpowder needed to fire larger shells at greater distances • -both navies used the smoothbore cannon, but the rifled cannon became more common in the 1850-60s • -had grooves on the inside of the barrel to impart a spin on the projectile • -Several types of cannon shots existed in the centuries before the Civil War, but virtually all of them were designed to cripple a ship or kill her crew • -explosive shells became widespread • -had a timed defuse inside the shell that would detonate after hitting the ship and create a huge hole that would sink the ship BACKGROUND INFORMATION CIVIL WAR NAVAL ACTIONS • IRONCLADS: • -developments in artillery lead to more alterations • -realized that wooden ships were vulnerable to destruction, explosive fire • -naval architects started to improve ships' defense by plating them with iron or steel • -because of the casing, shells would bounce off the side of the ship and this would allow the ship to take repeated hits • -ironclads were very heavy, so powerful steam engines took the place of sails, which were weaker and vulnerable to enemy fire • -first ironclads were built in Europe but neither navy had one in the beginning of the war • -both the North and the South started to build or convert ironclads from ships of various shapes and • -some ironclads were simply normal steam ships covered with metal plates (called casemate ironclads) • -the union built lots of "Monitor" class gunboats. these sat low in the water and utilized a revolving armored gun turret. • -ironclads were able to better protect themselves from enemy fire • -groups of ironclads were able to rush past forts to enter harbors, or even – on several occasions – defeat forts in artillery duels • TORPEDOS: • -the South had to find ways to protect themselves from the Union, and because they had a shortage of iron supply and weren't able to make powerful steam engines they had to find alternatives • -they decided that they would deploy torpedoes from underneath the water, so that the could destroy ironclads • -Confederacy designed the first “torpedo boats.” These carried mines on long spars in front of the ship. • -the boats were designed to be low in the water, and hard to spot so that they could avoid cannon fire • -these boats were quickly adopted by the Union BACKGROUND INFORMATION CIVIL WAR NAVAL ACTIONS • Submarines: • -the first submarine to destroy an enemy ship was the H. L. Hunley. It sunk the USS Housatonic IN February of 1864 near Charleston • -there was no other submarine that was able to achieve notable success during the rest of the war • The design for the submarines were taken from the concept of low-profile torpedo boats • Notable Developments: • USS Monitor was the first warship to use a revolving gun turret in combat • The Navy used air craft carriers to launch observation balloons BACKGROUND INFORMATION LIFE AS A SAILOR Requirements: Age: 18/21(with parent consent) If you were thirteen or younger, you could not enlist in the North and if you were fourteen or younger, you could not enlist in the South. Height: 5’8/4’8 Experience: If you were over the age of 33 and had no experience, you could not enlist, unless you had a trade. If he did have a trade, 38 was the limit. An inexperienced man between the ages of 25 and 35 could join in the South if he had a trade. Inexperienced men that didn’t have a trade were shipped away to be landsmen or coal heavers. *Payment: Landsmen and inexperienced hands: $12/mth Ordinary Seamen: $14/mth Seamen: $18/mth Third class: $7/mth Second Class: $8/mth African Americans: In order to fight in the First Class: $9/mth Confederate Navy, they needed special According to their knowledge or physical permission from either the Navy Department or abilities, boys were rated as third, second, or the local squadron commander. Slaves needed first class in ascending order. consent from their owners in order to enlist. The Union Navy had a high number of African North / South Americans in there lower ranks because they *Payment was the same for both the North and offered them recruiting stations South GROWTH OF THE NAVY DURING THE WAR GROWING NAVIES IN THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH • Growth in the North • Growth in the South • In the beginning, the North had less then 40 • Compared to the Northern Navy, the South usable ships had very few resources • Union was in need of a “brown water navy” • They had a handful of shipyards, a small • These were gunboats that would support merchant marine, and had no Navy. campaigns in Northern Virginia and the • The Confederates needed a Navy in order to Mississippi River break the Union blockade and to protect it’s port cities. • Gideon Welles, Lincoln’s Naval Secretary, created a task that would make every • Stephen Mallory, the Confederate Secretary of Southern inlet, port, and bay extremely the Navy, frantically looked for new ships and dangerous fro trade and created a task to attack Union merchant ships on the seas • North began to build dozens of new warships and purchased hundreds of merchant ships • Confederate Navy decided to challenge the that they converted into blockaders by adding Navy by introducing ironclads to their navy guns, for their navy. • Southern shipyards began making ironclads as • Union navy only had wooden ships, and they fast as they could upgraded to ironclads shortly after the • After South Caroline seceded, the newly Confederates did graduated class of from the Naval Academy in • The Union wooden Navy became obsolete Annapolis, Maryland was called into action to because of the South's ironclads fill the vacancies • Northern shipyards began making ironclads as • In the beginning of the war, the Confederates fast as they could only had two navy shipyards, Norfolk and Pensacola • In order to support Ulysses S. Grants army, the Union had to build a fleet of gunboats • They converted commercial ships into ships fitted for war bu outfitting them with guns GROWING NAVIES IN THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH • In the federal navy, there was only • The Confederates captured a few 1,457 officers and 7,600 seamen in Union ships and added them to the beginning of the war. By the their own navy end, it increased to 7,500 officers • A Confederate representative and 51,500 seamen. sailed to Britain, asking for help in • In January of 1862, the Union had building ship in order to defeat the 212 seaworthy vessels by repairing Union available ships, building new ones, • This would violate Britain's and adapting commercial vessels. neutrality • The Confederate representative had the ships built in his name as merchant vessels • As soon as they left British water, they outfitted the vessels for war HOW THE NORTH STRATEGICALLY UTILIZED THE NAVY UTILIZING THE NAVY • The Union (North) strategically utilized the navy when President Lincoln set the first naval goal: A blockade of the Southern Coasts • The proclamation was made April 19, 1861 for a blockade stretching from South Carolina to Texas • On April 27th, the blockade was extended in order to block North Carolina and Virginia • The plan was to cut off Southern trade with the outside world, and to prevent the sale of cotton, the Confederacy's major crop.
Recommended publications
  • “What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
    “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rewards of Risk-Taking: Two Civil War Admirals* 
    The 2014 George C. Marshall Lecture in Military History The Rewards of Risk-Taking: Two Civil War Admirals* James M. McPherson Abstract The willingness to take risks made Rear Admiral David Glasgow Far- ragut, victor at New Orleans in 1862 and Mobile Bay in 1864, the Union’s leading naval commander in the Civil War. Farragut’s boldness contrasted strongly with the lack of decisiveness shown in the failure in April 1863 to seize the port of Charleston, South Carolina, by Rear Admiral Samuel Francis Du Pont, whose capture of Port Royal Sound in South Carolina in November of 1861 had made him the North’s first naval hero of the war. Du Pont’s indecisiveness at Charleston led to his removal from command and a blighted career, while the risk-taking Farragut went on to become, along with generals U.S. Grant and Wil- liam T. Sherman, one of the principal architects of Union victory. n September 1864 Captain Charles Steedman of the United States Navy praised Rear Admiral David Glasgow Farragut for his decisive victory over ConfederateI forts and warships in the Battle of Mobile Bay the previous month. “That little man,” wrote Steedman of the wiry Farragut who was actually just * This essay derives from the George C. Marshall Lecture on Military History, delivered on 4 January 2014 at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, Washington, D.C. The Marshall Lecture is sponsored by the Society for Military History and the George C. Marshall Foundation. James M. McPherson earned a Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University in 1963 and from 1962 to 2004 taught at Princeton University, where he is currently the George Henry Davis ’86 Profes- sor of American History Emeritus.
    [Show full text]
  • By the History Workshop Table of Contents
    THINK LIKE A HISTORIAN BY THE HISTORY WORKSHOP TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: ............................................................................................................................................3 SUGGESTED GRADE LEVEL: .........................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVES: .................................................................................................................................................3 MATERIALS: ..................................................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ......................................................................................................................4 UNDERSTANDING MITCHELVILLE ...................................................................................................4 DOING HISTORICAL RESEARCH: .....................................................................................................15 LESSON ACTIVITIES: .....................................................................................................................................17 TEACHER GUIDANCE QUESTIONS: ..................................................................................................19 STANDARDS: ...................................................................................................................................19 RESOURCES: ....................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • "Or This Whole Affair Is a Failure": a Special Treasury Agent's Observations of the Port Royal Experiment, Port Royal, South Carolina, April to May, 1862
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2016 "Or this whole affair is a failure": a special treasury agent's observations of the Port Royal Experiment, Port Royal, South Carolina, April to May, 1862 Michael Edward Scott Emett [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Emett, Michael Edward Scott, ""Or this whole affair is a failure": a special treasury agent's observations of the Port Royal Experiment, Port Royal, South Carolina, April to May, 1862" (2016). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1028. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1028 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. “OR THIS WHOLE AFFAIR IS A FAILURE”: A SPECIAL TREASURY AGENT’S OBSERVATIONS OF THE PORT ROYAL EXPERIMENT, PORT ROYAL, SOUTH CAROLINA, APRIL TO MAY, 1862 A thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Michael Edward Scott Emett Approved by Dr. Michael Woods, Committee Chairperson Dr. Robert Deal Dr. Tyler Parry Marshall University July 2016 APPROVAL OF THESIS We, the faculty supervising the work of Michael Edward Scott Emett, affirm that the thesis, "Or This Whole ffiir Is A Failure": A Special Treasury Agent's Observations of the Port Royal Experiment, Port Royal, South Carolins, April to May, 1865, meets dre high academic standards for original scholarship and creative work established by the Masters of History Program and the College of Liberal Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil War
    American Civil War Major Battles & Minor Engagements 1861-1865 1861 ........ p. 2 1862 ........ p. 4 1863 ........ p. 9 1864 ........ p. 13 1865 ........ p. 19 CIVIL WAR IMPRESSIONIST ASSOCIATION 1 Civil War Battles: 1861 Eastern Theater April 12 - Battle of Fort Sumter (& Fort Moultie), Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. The bombardment/siege and ultimate surrender of Fort Sumter by Brig. General P.G.T. Beauregard was the official start of the Civil War. https://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm June 3 - Battle of Philippi, (West) Virginia A skirmish involving over 3,000 soldiers, Philippi was the first battle of the American Civil War. June 10 - Big Bethel, Virginia The skirmish of Big Bethel was the first land battle of the civil war and was a portent of the carnage that was to come. July 11 - Rich Mountain, (West) Virginia July 21 - First Battle of Bull Run, Manassas, Virginia Also known as First Manassas, the first major engagement of the American Civil War was a shocking rout of Union soldiers by confederates at Manassas Junction, VA. August 28-29 - Hatteras Inlet, North Carolina September 10 - Carnifax Ferry, (West) Virginia September 12-15 - Cheat Mountain, (West) Virginia October 3 - Greenbrier River, (West) Virginia October 21 - Ball's Bluff, Virginia October 9 - Battle of Santa Rosa Island, Santa Rosa Island (Florida) The Battle of Santa Rosa Island was a failed attempt by Confederate forces to take the Union-held Fort Pickens. November 7-8 - Battle of Port Royal Sound, Port Royal Sound, South Carolina The battle of Port Royal was one of the earliest amphibious operations of the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Occupation of Hilton Head, a Civilian Town Grew up to Serve the Needs of the Large Union Base and Its Garrison Here
    After the occupation of Hilton Head, a civilian town grew up to serve the needs of the large Union base and its garrison here. The town boasted a hotel, a theater, 2 newspapers, and numerous stores, centering along a street, officially Suttlers Row, which ran east from this point about ½ mile to the army tent encampment. 1961 by Hilton Head Island Historical Society. (Marker Number 7-6.) 32° 13.952′ N, 80° 40.632′ W. Marker is in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, in Beaufort County. Marker is on Fort Walker Drive, on the right when traveling north. Click for map. Between N. Port Royal Dr. & Steam Gun Place - Port Royal Plantation - a Secure Gated Community, Restricted access. Marker is in this post office area: Hilton Head Island SC 29928, United States of America. "Robbers Row" Marker- Historical Marker "Robbers Row" Marker, Port Royal Sound visible in background Port Royal Plantation's golf course is cut through beautiful stands of magnolias and live oaks. Rich in history, set atop former Civil War grounds on the marsh side of the plantation. "Robbers Row" Marker along with Interpretive markers along Ft. Walker Drive "Robbers Row" Number 17, Robbers Row, was the business address of the U.S. Customs House, where much business was done behind this modest facade. Dozens of ships entered the port monthly from as far away as Boston. There was often an overwhelming temptation to sell some of the merchandise on the black market to the Confederates. "Robbers Row”, Boat Repair Shop When this picture was taken, October 27, 1854, Admiral Dahlgren was assembling ships to support Sherman's March to the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Created by Dr. George C. Rable
    Author Surname Beginning with “M” Collection created by Dr. George C. Rable Documents added as of September 2021 McDonald, David. “Diaries of Judge David McDonald.” Indiana Magazine of History 28 (December 1932): 282-306. Trip to Washington,, 1862, 294ff Federal courts, 294ff Buckner and treason charge, 295 Poor women, poverty, 295 McClellan, 295 Treason, debate in Senate, 296 Lincoln, mixed assessment, 296-97 Indiana appointments, 297 Gideon Welles, 297 Montgomery Blair, 297 Senator James Harlan, 297 McClellan and Army of the Potomac, 298 Methodist sermon, 298 Indiana soldiers, wounded soldiers, 298 Sisters of Charity, 298-99 Unitarian service, 299 McClellan on the Peninsula, 299 Judicial appointment, 1864, 299ff Many soldiers in Washington, 300 Visit with Lincoln, 300-1 Railroad journey to Washington, 301 Elihu Washburne, 302 Unitarian sermon against slavery, 302 Death of Roger Taney, 302-3 Supreme Court, 303 Spiritualist, 304 James S. Lane, Lincoln, judicial appointment, 305 McNelly, James Boies. “I Am to Write a Few Things.” Civil War Times Illustrated 35 (February 1997) electronic, no pagination 7th Kentucky Infantry Columbus Kentucky Belmont Diarrhea Corinth Vicksburg Hospital Baton Rouge 2 Harrisburg, Tupelo Nathan Bedford Forrest Brice’s Crossroads Hood’s Tennessee campaign Selma McQuaid, John L. and L. H. Mangum. “Cleburne’s Last Charge.” Civil War Times Illustrated 36 (February 1998): electronic, no pagination. Disputes earlier accounts of Cleburne’s death Body several yards from the Federal works Death of General Granbury Cleburne had two horses killed the charged the works on foot Mansur, W. H. “Diary of Lieutenant W. H. Mansur.” United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine 11 (December 1948): 9-10.
    [Show full text]
  • See a Preview of Civil War Activities for Kids
    Table of Contents Generals of the Civil War……………………………………………………………………………………..4 Key People of the Civil War ………………………………………………………………………………….5 Civil War Battles Crossword Puzzle……………………………………………………………………….6 Timeline of Civil War Battles………………………………………………………………………………..8 Confederate States and Dates Word Search…………………………………………………………...9 Generals of the Union and the Confederacy—Venn Diagram Puzzle………………………..10 Grant or Lee……………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 Lincoln or Davis………………………………………………………………………………………………...13 Battle Facts Multiple Choice………………………………………………………………………………..14 North vs. South Tile Puzzle………………………………………………………………………………....15 Generals Matching……………………………………………………………………………………………..17 Gettysburg Address Fill-In………………………………………………………………………………....18 Secession Timeline…………………………………………………………………………………………….19 Battlefield Locations………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Notable People of the Civil War Graph Decoding……………………………………………...….20 Key Dates Fill-In………………………………………………………………………………………………..22 Union and Confederate States Vertical Puzzle……………………………………………………...23 Civil War Maze………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Race to Your Regiment Game……………………………………………………………………………..26 Answer Keys……………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 © 2014 Bonnie Rose Hudson WriteBonnieRose.com 1 Civil War Battles Crossword Puzzle Below are listed a few of the battles of the Civil War. Using the clues shown below, complete the crossword puzzle. (The part of the name in bold is the part that is used in the crossword puzzle.) Battle of Fort Sumter Battle
    [Show full text]
  • Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164
    Guide to the Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164 The Library at The Mariners' Museum Contact Information: The Library at The Mariners' Museum 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591­7782 Fax: (757) 591­7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.mariner.org/library Processed by: Gregg Cina, 2005 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Library at The Mariners' Museum Title: Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog number: MS164 Accession number: None Physical Characteristics: 8 document cases Language(s): English Creator(s): Irwin M. Berent SCOPE AND CONTENT This collection is composed of materials pertaining to the crew and officers who served aboard USS Monitor and CSS Virginia as well as their descendents. Irwin Berent compiled and generated these materials between 1978 and 1988. This collection is the result of his work on two different, but overlapping groups of projects: the first centers on the crew and officers of said vessels; the second concentrates on their descendents. The first group of projects concerns Berent’s research for biographical works he published on the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia. Perhaps the most notable among these is Crewmen of the USS Monitor: A Biographical Directory published in 1982. Materials include photocopies of affidavits, clippings, congressional reports, correspondence, death certificates, depositions, marriage certificates, medical records, military records, notes, and pension records from the 1860s through the 1920s that Berent obtained from the United States National Archives and Records Administration. Related notes and correspondence as well as edited and unedited copies of manuscripts are also included. The second group of projects concerns Berent’s work locating descendents of the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia, his communication with them, and subsequent meetings and events.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Iron Coffin : War, Technology, and Experience
    IRON COFFIN : WAR, TECHNOLOGY, AND EXPERIENCE ABOARD THE USS MONITOR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David A. Mindell | 208 pages | 01 Mar 2012 | JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9781421405209 | English | Baltimore, MD, United States Iron Coffin : War, Technology, and Experience aboard the USS Monitor PDF Book Phone number. In the end, neither design lasted very long, though the U. The next day would prove to be a seminal moment in naval warfare. Mindell uses their compelling stories, and those of other shipmates, to recreate the thrills and dangers of living and fighting aboard this superweapon. The battle heralded the end of naval combat between wooden ships. When the Federal forces lost Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Virginia, in April , they burned several warships, including the heavy steam frigate Merrimack. Condition: Used-Good Details. Monitor was built in a day rush to counter the threat of the Confederate ironclad Virginia constructed from remnants of USS Merrimac. Civil War. He had become a midshipman in and had nearly-continuous service ever since with a very good record. Allow this favorite library to be seen by others Keep this favorite library private. Save for Later. Building a Ship, Speaking Success pp. The Monitor could fire only once in seven or eight minutes but was faster and more maneuverable than her larger opponent. War, technology, and experience aboard the USS Monitor. But in addition, Buchanan was an old sea dog with a reputation for aggressiveness. Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Battles, Campaigns, and Sieges
    Union Victories 1862 February 6-16: Fort Henry and Fort Donelson Campaign (Tennessee) March 7-8: Battle of Pea Ridge (Arkansas) April 6-7: Battle of Shiloh/ Pittsburg Landing (Tennessee) April 24-27: Battle of New Orleans (Louisiana) September 17: Battle of Antietam/ Sharpsburg (Maryland) October 8: Battle of Perryville (Kentucky) December 31-January 2, 1863: Battle of Stone’s River/ Murfreesboro (Tennessee) 1863 March 29- July 4: Vicksburg Campaign and Siege (Mississippi)- turning point in the West July 1-3: Battle of Gettysburg (Pennsylvania)- turning point in the East November 23-25: Battle of Chattanooga (Tennessee) 1864 May 7-September 2: Atlanta Campaign (Georgia) June 15-April 2, 1865: Petersburg Campaign and Siege (Virginia) August 5: Battle of Mobile Bay (Alabama) October 19: Battle of Cedar Creek (Virginia) December 15-16: Battle of Nashville (Tennessee) November 14-December 22: Sherman’s March to the Sea (Georgia) 1865 March 19-21: Battle of Bentonville/ Carolinas Campaign (North Carolina) Confederate Victories 1861 April 12-14: Fort Sumter (South Carolina) July 21: First Battle of Manassas/ First Bull Run (Virginia) August 10: Battle of Wilson’s Creek (Missouri) 1862 March 17-July: Peninsula Campaign (Virginia) March 23-June 9: Jackson’s Valley Campaign (Virginia) June 25-July 2: Seven Days Battle (Virginia) August 28-30: Second Battle of Manassas/ Second Bull Run (Virginia) December 11-13: Battle of Fredericksburg (Virginia) 1863 May 1-4: Battle of Chancellorsville (Virginia) September 19-20: Battle of Chickamauga (Georgia)
    [Show full text]
  • Common Men in Uncommon Times: the Daily Lives of Civil
    COMMON MEN IN UNCOMMON TIMES: ANALYZING THE DAILY LIVES OF AMERICAN CIVIL WAR SAILORS USING PERSONAL NARRATIVES A Thesis by STEPHANIE K KOENIG Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Kevin J. Crisman Committee Members, Joseph Dawson III Donny L. Hamilton Head of Department, Cynthia Werner August 2016 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2016 Stephanie Koenig ABSTRACT The American Civil War was a tumultuous period for the United States, forcing brother against brother in a battle over the secession of the Confederate States. To study the Civil War sailor, a wealth of archival information exists in the form of personal narratives. Like their ships, naval crews were very much a reflection of where they were built and supplied. The purpose of this thesis is to provide scholars with a collection of narratives relevant to the study of shipboard life and to annotate this list with pertinent details drawn from those sources. There is a wealth of information concerning shipboard life during the American Civil War in the form of personal narratives and primary sources, and the following collection extracts evidence for shipboard life and seeks to contextualize the daily lives of sailors within their societal framework. The primary accounts predictably reflect a standardized lifestyle, but was there any variation between Confederate and United States shipboard conditions? The American Civil War has always been a period of exceptional historical interest, especially to families whose ancestry can be traced back to that cataclysmic event.
    [Show full text]