[Itobiad], 2018, 7 (4): 2569/2590
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11 -
Turkey Country Study
Initiative on Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children This report was prepared by an independent expert as part of the Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children with support from R.T. Ministry of National Education Directorate General for Basic Education and UNICEF Turkey under the Govern- ment of Republic of Turkey – UNICEF 2011-2015 Country Programme Action Plan. The statements in this report are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of National Education or UNICEF. ISBN: 978-92-806-4725-9 Cover Image: © UNICEF/NYHQ2005-1203/LeMoyne A girl removes laundry from the line at a camp for migrant workers near the city of Adana-Turkey. Contents Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................................................7 List of Tables and Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................9 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................13 -
Report to the Turkish Government on the Visit to Turkey Carried Out
CPT/Inf (2011) 13 Report to the Turkish Government on the visit to Turkey carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 17 June 2009 The Turkish Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2011) 14. Strasbourg, 31 March 2011 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Co-operation and consultations held by the delegation.........................................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................9 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................10 A. Monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty......................................................................10 B. Law enforcement agencies......................................................................................................11 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................11 -
The Bees of the Genus Hylaeus Fabricius, 1793 of Turkey, with Keys to the Subgenera and Species (Hymenoptera: Anthophila, Colletidae)
70 (2): 273 – 346 2020 © 2020 SenckenbergThe Authors Gesellschaft für Naturforschung The bees of the genus Hylaeus Fabricius, 1793 of Turkey, with keys to the subgenera and species (Hymenoptera: Anthophila, Colletidae) With 17 figures Hikmet Özbek 1 and Holger H. Dathe 2 1 Atatürk University, Agricultural Faculty, Plant Protection Department, TR–25240 Erzurum, Turkey. – [email protected] 2 Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Straße 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany. – [email protected] Published on 2020–12–01 DOI:10.21248/contrib.entomol.70.2.273-346 Abstract The paper presents data of around 4000 previously unpublished specimens, collected in various parts of the country during the last decades. With literature sources, a total of 86 species of the genus Hylaeus Fabricius, 1793 from 10 subgenera are compiled for Turkey. New for Turkey are 11 species: Hylaeus (Dentigera) kahri Förster, 1871, H. (Dentigera) pallidicornis Morawitz, 1876, H. (Hylaeus) deceptorius (Benoist, 1959), H. (Hylaeus) gracilicornis (Morawitz, 1867), H. (Hylaeus) paulus Bridwell, 1919, H. (Hylaeus) trisignatus Morawitz, 1876, H. (Nesoprosopis) pectoralis Förster, 1871, H. (Prosopis) incongruus Förster, 1871, H. (Prosopis) trinotatus (Pérez, 1896), H. (Prosopis) variolaris Morawitz, 1876 and H. (Spatulariella) sulphuripes (Gribodo, 1894). No new specimens could be found of 13 species which had been detected formerly. Our knowledge on the distribution of numerous species is greatly expanded. The characteristics of distribution are defined for the individual species. For example, H. meridionalis is the most widespread with records from 46 provinces covering all geographical regions of the country, while many other species are only known from one province, sometimes from a single record. -
Weapons Transfers and Violations of the Laws of War in Turkey
WEAPONS TRANSFERS AND VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR IN TURKEY Human Rights Watch Arms Project Human Right Watch New York AAA Washington AAA Los Angeles AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 November 1995 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-81502 ISBN 1-56432-161-4 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It also includes five collaborative projects on arms transfers, children's rights, free expression, prison conditions, and women's rights. It maintains offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London, Brussels, Moscow, Dushanbe, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Holly J. -
Interpretations of the Socio-Economic Structure of the Urartian Kingdom
UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF HISTORIES, LANGUAGES AND CULTURES (ARCHAEOLOGY, CLASSICS AND EGYPTOLOGY) INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE URARTIAN KINGDOM By ALİ ÇİFÇİ Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 Liverpool i To my parents Cennet ÇİFÇİ and Ali ÇİFÇİ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me to complete this research and in particular I would like to thank to my supervisors, Alan M. Greaves and Christopher Tuplin, both of whom have provided me with ideas and advice on numerous occasions. Also I would like to thank to my examiners Bruce Routledge and Claudia Glatz for their comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank Paul Zimansky for reading the first drafts of my thesis and for his subsequent suggestions and advice as to how it could be improved. I must also express my gratitude to Kemalettin Köroğlu, who has been generous with his help and advice and Altan Çilingiroğlu for allowing me to participate in the Ayanis excavation and for scholarly conversations. Further thanks are due to Erkan Konyar, who generously provided unpublished information and to the Van Kalesi Höyüğü excavation team for their support. Mirjo Salvini, Mehmet Karaosmanoğlu and Stephan Kroll have also offered help and advice on various aspects of Urartian archaeology and I am also grateful to Magnus Widell for his help with cuneiform inscriptions. In addition, I would like to thank Emel Oybak Dönmez, Atilla Batmaz, Yervand Greakyan and Mehmet Ali Yılmaz for sending me literature that was helpful to my research. -
TURKEY, YEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 10 June 2020
TURKEY, YEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 10 June 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 6 June 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 TURKEY, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 10 JUNE 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Protests 1890 1 3 Conflict incidents by category 2 Strategic developments 600 0 0 Development of conflict incidents from 2016 to 2019 2 Battles 466 259 755 Violence against civilians 193 12 14 Methodology 3 Explosions / Remote 159 71 172 Conflict incidents per province 4 violence Riots 75 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 5 Total 3383 344 945 Disclaimer 11 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 6 June 2020). Development of conflict incidents from 2016 to 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 6 June 2020). 2 TURKEY, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 10 JUNE 2020 Methodology on what level of detail is reported. Thus, towns may represent the wider region in which an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province The data used in this report was collected by the Armed Conflict Location & Event is known. -
Wheat Landraces in Farmers' Fields in Turkey. National Survey, Collection
WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Alexey Morgounov ©FAO/ WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 Mustafa KAN, Murat KÜÇÜKÇONGAR, Mesut KESER, Alexey MORGOUNOV, Hafiz MUMINJANOV, Fatih ÖZDEMIR, Calvin QUALSET FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Ankara, 2015 Citation: FAO, 2015. Wheat Landraces in Farmers’ Fields in Turkey: National Survey, Collection, and Conservation, 2009-2014, by Mustafa Kan, Murat Küçükçongar, Mesut Keser, Alexey Morgounov, Hafiz Muminjanov, Fatih Özdemir, Calvin Qualset The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN: 978-92-5-109048-0 © FAO, 2015 -
Karlıca Volkanitlerinin (Hamur-Ağrı) Petrografik Ve Jeokimyasal Özellikleri
Yerbilimleri, 2019, 40 (1), 72-91, DOI:10.17824/yerbilimleri.509982 Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni Bulletin of the Earth Sciences Application and Research Centre of Hacettepe University Karlıca Volkanitlerinin (Hamur-Ağrı) Petrografik ve Jeokimyasal Özellikleri Petrographic and Geochemical Features of the Karlıca Volcanites (Hamur-Ağrı) MUSTAFA AÇLAN 1*A, NURSELİ DAVRAN 1B 1 Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, 65080 Van Geliş (received): 8 Ocak (January) 2019 Kabul (accepted) 13 Nisan (April) 2019 ÖZ Bu çalışma, Demirkapı (Hamur-Ağrı) dolaylarındaki volkanik kayaçların petrografik ve jeokimyasal özelliklerini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışma alanındaki volkanitler subalkali, kalkalkali, yüksek K’lu seri ve şoşonitik özelliklere sahip olup andezit, dasit, ignimbrit ve tüflerden meydana gelirler. Bu volkanik kayaçlar hafif nadir toprak elementleri (HNTE) ve büyük iyonlu litofil elementler (BİLE) (Cs, Rb, Ba, K) açısından zenginleşme gösterirler. Karlıca volkanitlerinin Nb/Yb and (Th/Nb)N oranları sırasıyla 8.56-15.52 ve 12.59-15.43 arasında değişir. Ortalama Sr ve Ba değerleri 505.15ppm ve 626.16 ppm olup bu değerler ortalama kıtasal kabuk değerlerinin üzerindedir. Karlıca volkanitlerindeki bu zenginleşmeler ve yüksek Sr ve Ba değerlerinden bu kayaçların oluşumu ve evrimi sırasında fraksiyonel kristallenme ile birlikte kabuksal kirlenmenin de etkili bir süreç olduğu sonucu çıkarılabilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğu Anadolu, Ağrı, Karlıca volkanitleri, andezit, ignimbrit. ABSTRACT This study was carried out to reveal the petrographic and geochemical features of the rocks around Demirkapı (Hamur-Ağrı). The volcanites in the study area have subalkaline, calc-alkaline, high-K calc-alkaline and shoshonitic features and consist of andesite, dacite, ignimbrite and tuffs. -
Submitted to the General Directorate of Social Assistance and Solidarity
Terence Roopnaraine, and With contributions from Natalia Smith, Elif Altinok, Nurfer Çelebioğlu, Sema Cemal, Wahid Quabili, Tugba Atalar, Suzulay Hazar, Ozlem Agaoglu and Selahattin Erhan Submitted to the General Directorate of Social Assistance and Solidarity Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey Prepared by the International Food Policy Research Institute 2033 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, U.S.A. In collaboration with the AGRIN Co. Ltd. Bestekar Sokak 30/3, Kavaklidere 06680, Ankara, Turkey March 26, 2007 The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and its collaborator, the AGRIN Company Limited, gratefully acknowledge the General Directorate of Social Assistance and Solidarity (SYDGM) for funding the Impact Evaluation of the Conditional Cash Transfers Project, under which this final evaluation report has been completed. The authors are especially indebted to Yadigar Gökalp, Director of the Social Risk Mitigation Project (SRMP), for her advice and support. We thank Süha Barlas, Ümit BaĢaran, Elif Güden, Derya HaĢemoğlu, Nazile Kademli, Gökhan Karatepe, Yalçın Kaya, Müge NiĢancı, Tomris OkĢar, Ekrem Serin, Hamdi Tomaç, Sevtap Turan, SavaĢ Yılmaz, and Feridun Akgöbek of the SRMP for their cooperation. We are also grateful to Cahit Bağcı from the State Planning Organization, and Mr.Mustafa Acar, from Kırıkkale University, for their comments on the study design. For the Quantitative Assessment, managers and staff of local Social Solidarity Foundations provided invaluable information and we are grateful for their support. The study would not have been possible without the cooperation of the 2,905 families from 26 provinces of Turkey who patiently answered numerous questions during the comprehensive household survey, which is the basis of this study. -
GEOLOGY of EASTERN and SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA (Part II) *
GEOLOGY OF EASTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA (Part II) * İ. Enver ALTINLI Technical University of İstanbul STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY The broad structural regions, such as eugeosynclinal region, miogeosynclinal region, together with the former's secondary orogenetic belts and massifs, are known through their stratigraphic peculiarities, magmatic evolution, structural setup, under- ground resources and physiographic traits. The tectonic divide between eugeosyncline and miogeosyncline is induced through geanticline of Upper Cretaceous - Paleocene, which is exposed in the west, but deduced through a lagoonal trend to the northeast of Siirt, and further east a line connecting Hakkari to Salaran Mountain, where an interfinger- ing of the sediments of each environment is observed. The intersections of a syncline with an axial low made wide depressions that became filled with younger deposits, and at least leveled off as plains (ova). The Tectonic Map shows the locations and the names of the eugeosyncline; namely, from north to south: Anatolids, Taurids, Iranids; the massifs; the miogeosyncline boundaries; and the main folds, faults and overthrusts. Massifs The massifs of anticlinorial character are «en echelon», doubly plungingor not, with salients and recesses. Presumably they are not the fragments of a shield. Bitlis massif after plunging westward reappears in the Pütürge massif; jointly they make the backbone of Eastern Anatolia. Over the intervening Ergani-Erzincan no virgation is detected. The structural components of the normal anticlinoria are not differentiated, but greenstone and extended overthrusting are displayed. The northern massifs over the Anatolids are thrown into major and minor folds. They also exhibit faults, folia- tion mainly parallel to the bedding, rock cleavage, shearing, etc. -
Baseline Assessment in Turkey April - July 2018
ANALYSIS: BASELINE ASSESSMENT IN TURKEY APRIL - JULY 2018 INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR MIGRATION (IOM) Photo: Muse Mohammed/IOM 2016 Contact: DTM Turkey [email protected] migration.iom.int/europe @globaldtm 1 MIGRANTS’ PRESENCE MONITORING IN TURKEY BASELINE ASSESSMENT ROUND II APRIL - JUNE 2018 • Background • Province Based • AĞRI • KAHRAMANMARAŞ Analysis • AKSARAY • KIRKLARELİ • Methodology • AYDIN • SAKARYA • Coverage • ÇANAKKALE • TRABZON CONTENT • Key Findings • ISPARTA • YALOVA About DTM’s Baseline Assessment Baseline 1, the initial phase of province-based is recorded along with the figures and arrival date baseline assessment of DTM, was conducted for each nationality individually. As for the final in 10 selected provinces (Çanakkale, Yalova, part; the informant’s gender, contact information, Trabzon, Isparta, Ağrı, Aksaray, Kırklareli, Aydın, and type (i.e. religious leader, NGO worker, Kahramanmaraş, and Sakarya) of Turkey, from community leader, mukhtar, etc.) are processed the southeast to the northwest, in April 2018. herein based on his/her consent. Concurrently, Baseline 2 phase was performed in April-June 2018 in the same 10 provinces The baseline data collection provides valuable 5,339 interviews with key informants were with the involvement of 10 team leaders and 10 insight for tracking changes in mobility; and enumerators. identifying the migrant’s category and figures conducted between 1 April and 1 June 2018 including estimated figures for irregular migrants. Data collection phase of baseline assessment It has been designed to track migrants’ presence is carried out based on the assessment form in in Turkey, create a database of the same, and for Baseline 1 and Baseline 2. In Baseline 1 assessment reporting. This assessment aims to compile the form, the researcher, research site and date are data on migrants’ presence in Turkey and present first noted.