DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpretations of the Socio-Economic Structure of the Urartian Kingdom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpretations of the Socio-Economic Structure of the Urartian Kingdom UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF HISTORIES, LANGUAGES AND CULTURES (ARCHAEOLOGY, CLASSICS AND EGYPTOLOGY) INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE URARTIAN KINGDOM By ALİ ÇİFÇİ Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 Liverpool i To my parents Cennet ÇİFÇİ and Ali ÇİFÇİ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me to complete this research and in particular I would like to thank to my supervisors, Alan M. Greaves and Christopher Tuplin, both of whom have provided me with ideas and advice on numerous occasions. Also I would like to thank to my examiners Bruce Routledge and Claudia Glatz for their comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank Paul Zimansky for reading the first drafts of my thesis and for his subsequent suggestions and advice as to how it could be improved. I must also express my gratitude to Kemalettin Köroğlu, who has been generous with his help and advice and Altan Çilingiroğlu for allowing me to participate in the Ayanis excavation and for scholarly conversations. Further thanks are due to Erkan Konyar, who generously provided unpublished information and to the Van Kalesi Höyüğü excavation team for their support. Mirjo Salvini, Mehmet Karaosmanoğlu and Stephan Kroll have also offered help and advice on various aspects of Urartian archaeology and I am also grateful to Magnus Widell for his help with cuneiform inscriptions. In addition, I would like to thank Emel Oybak Dönmez, Atilla Batmaz, Yervand Greakyan and Mehmet Ali Yılmaz for sending me literature that was helpful to my research. I am also grateful to Bülent Genç and Bilcan Gökçe who were consistently supported me throughout this project and who occasionally supplied me with research material from Turkey and Davut Yigitpaşa also helped with the illustrations. I would not have been able to finish this thesis without the constant support of my fellow graduate students both in Liverpool and in Turkey, as well as my colleagues at the Harold Cohen Library. Finally, I would like to thank Phil Freeman, Julian Heath, Erica Hughes, and Jason P. Wickham for kindly reading parts of this research; and Judith Corbelli who helped me with the translation of Urartian texts from Italian into English. Lastly, but not least, I would like to express my gratitude to my sister Gönül [Hatun], brother Ercan and most importantly to my parents for their encouragement and support throughout my study in Liverpool. Ali Çifçi Liverpool April 2014 iii INTERPRETATIONS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE URARTIAN KINGDOM ALİ ÇİFÇİ University of Liverpool, 2014 ABSTRACT The aims of this research are to provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence for the socio-economic structure of the Urartian kingdom (of the 9th-6th centuries BC) and by doing so, to analyse and critique previous interpretations of the subject. Although there has been intensive research on different aspects of the Urartian kingdom, mainly chronological studies or excavations and surveys that cover different parts of what was once the lands of the kingdom, unlike previous studies this research presents a systematic review of the geographical, archaeological and textual evidence of the Urartian (and Assyrian where relevant textual evidence is available) as well as original ethnographic observations in order to analyse the socio-economic and administrative organisation of the Urartian kingdom. After reviewing and evaluating the history of research of Soviet, Turkish and Western scholars on various aspects of the Urartian kingdom, I move on to investigating the available economic resources in the region and the movement of commodities such as the produce of arable agriculture, animal husbandry, metallurgy, and craft activities undertaken by Urartian society. The next step, in order to understand the management of these economic resources, is to examine the administrative organisation of the state including the Urartian concept of kingship and the king’s role in administration, construction activities, the administrative division of the kingdom, and the income generated by warfare. It is concluded that the Urartian state economy was heavily dependent on agriculture and animal husbandry. Military expeditions generated substantial income in the form of livestock and prisoners of war. Further wealth was accumulated by tribute, taxation and metallurgical activities. However, how these factors combined into a single economic system has been variously interpreted by individual scholars in response to their contemporary theoretical and political context. iv Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv ABBREVIATIONS ix LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF MAPS xii LIST OF FIGURES xiii INTRODUCTION 1 I. A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE MATERIAL I.1. Topography, Hydrology, Climate and Ecology 5 I.2. The Source Material 7 I.2.1. Archaeological Data 7 I.2.2. Urartian Texts 8 I.2.3. Assyrian Texts 9 I.2.4. Ethnographic Observations 10 I.3. The Rediscovery of Urartu 11 I.4. Urartu between East and West: Ideologies and Interpretations 13 I.4.1. Karmir-Blur: The Marxist School of Urartian Archaeology 14 I.4.2. Çavuştepe: The Turkish School of Urartian Archaeology 18 I.4.3. Bastam: The Western School of Urartian Archaeology 20 I.4.4. Summary and Research Questions 24 II. CONTROL OF CAPITAL IN URARTU: ECONOMIC RESOURCES AND MOVEMENT OF COMMODITIES II.1. ARABLE AGRICULTURE 28 II.1.1. Introduction 28 II.1.2. Irrigation 28 II.1.2.1. Geography and Hydrology of the Urartian Territory 28 II.1.2.2. Archaeological Evidence 30 II.1.2.3. Textual Evidence 31 II.1.2.4. Assessment of Archaeological and Textual Evidence on Irrigation 36 II.1.3. Ethnographic Observations and Contemporary Arable Agriculture 41 II.1.4. Arable Agricultural Areas 44 v II.1.5. Arable Crops 51 II.1.6. Textual Evidence of Urartian and Assyrian on Arable Agriculture 56 II.1.7. Storage Facilities 61 II.1.7. 1. É ʼari (Granaries) and Measurement Units of Kapi and BANEŠ 62 II.1.7. 2. Storage Facilities with pithoi and the measurement units of Aqarqi, Terusi and LIŠ 66 II.1.8. Conclusion 73 II.2. ANIMAL HUSBANDRY 75 II.2.1. Introduction 75 II.2.2. Contemporary Animal Husbandry 77 II.2.3. Written Sources of Urartian and Assyrian 79 II.2.4. The Role of Animals in Urartian Religion 85 II.2.5. Archaeological Evidence 89 II.2.6. Conclusion 94 II.3. METALLURGY 96 II.3.1. Introduction 96 II.3.2. Written Sources for Ore Deposits of the Urartian Territory 97 II.3.3. Metal workshops 103 II.3.4.The Role of Metallurgy in Urartu 106 II.3.4.1. Iron 107 II.3.4.2. Bronze 114 II.3.4.3. Silver and Gold 125 II.3.5. Conclusion 128 II.4. TRADE 129 II.4.1. Introduction 129 II.4.2. North-South Trade Routes 131 II.4.3. Archaeological and Textual Evidence 135 II.4.4. Conclusion 140 II.5. CRAFTS 141 II.5.1. Introduction 141 II.5.2.Textiles 141 vi II.5.2.1. Archaeological Remains 142 II.5.2.2. Written Evidence for Textiles 144 II.5.2.3. Representational Evidence 145 II.5.3. Carpentry 149 II.5.4. Pottery 153 II.5.5. Conclusion 156 III. ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE OF THE URARTIAN KINGDOM III.1. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS 159 III.1.1. Introduction 159 III.1.2. The Capital Tušpa 159 III.1.3. Provincial Administration 163 III.1.3.1. LÚEN.NAM (Provincial Governor) 163 III.1.3.2. Provinces or Major Citadels 168 III.1.4. Conclusion 173 III.2. BUILDING ACTIVITIES OF THE MONARCH 174 III.2.1. Introduction 174 III.2.2. URU (City?) 175 III.2.3. É.GAL (Fortress) 179 III.2.4. Cultic Structures (KÁ / Šeištili, Susi and É.BÁRA) 183 III.2.5. Other Buildings 188 III.2.6. Conclusion 191 III.3. THE ARMY 193 III.3.1. Introduction 193 III.3.2. Urartian Gods and Their Role in the Army 193 III.3.3. The Division of the Army Units 195 III.3.3.1. GIŠGIRGIRMEŠ (Chariotry) 195 III.3.3.2. PIT-HAL-LUMEŠ (Cavalry) 196 III.3.3.3. LÚÉRINMEŠ (Infantry) 197 III.3.4. The Size and Structure of the Army 197 III.3.5. LÚturtānu (Commander-in-Chief) 203 vii III.3.6. The King as a Commander-in-Chief 205 III.3.7. Conclusion 206 III.4. THE SPOILS OF WAR 208 III.4.1. Introduction 208 III.4.2. Booty 208 III.4.3. Distribution of Booty 212 III.4.4. Aims and Objectives of Deportation 213 III.4.5. Tribute 214 III.4.6. Conclusion 217 II.5. THE MONARCHY 222 III.5.1. Introduction 222 III.5.2. The Monarch and Haldi 222 III.5.3. The Monarch and the Royal Succession 224 III.5.4. Royal Titles 226 III.5.4.1. The Standard Titles 227 III.5.4.2. The Exceptional Titles 229 III.5.5. The King’s Officials 230 III.5.5.1. LÚa-ṣu-li (LÚA.ZUM-li) 231 III.5.5.2. The Personnel of Rusaḫinili KURQilbani=kai 232 III.5.5.3. Other Officials 234 III.5.6. The King as an Administrator 235 III.5.7. Conclusion 238 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 243 APPENDIX 248 BIBLIOGRAPHY 254 MAPS 296 FIGURES 301 viii ABBREVIATIONS AJA American Journal of Archaeology. AnAr Anadolu Araştırmaları. ANES Ancient Near Eastern Studies. AnSt Anatolian Studies. ARAB I-II D. D. Luckenbill, 1989. Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia I-II. London, Histories & Mysteries of Man. AMI Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran. AMIT Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan. AST Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı. CAD A. L. Oppenheim and E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka Lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands: Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages Gander, Max DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2014-0039 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-119374 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Gander, Max (2014). Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands: Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages. Klio. Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte, 96(2):369-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2014-0039 Klio 2014; 96(2): 369–415 Max Gander Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka lands. Some Thoughts on the History of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages Summary: The present article contains observations on the invasion of Lycia by the Hittite king Tudhaliya IV as described in the Yalburt inscription. The author questions the commonly found identification of the land of VITIS/Wiyanwanda with the city of Oinoanda on account of the problems raised by the reading of the sign VITIS as well as of archaeological and strategical observations. With the aid of Lycian and Greek inscriptions the author argues that the original Wiya- nawanda/Oinoanda was located further south than the city commonly known as Oinoanda situated above İncealiler. These insights lead to a reassessment of the Hittite-Luwian sources concerning the conquest of Lycia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet of Armenia, 1920
    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the Evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews)
    Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews) The social history of tenth and eleventh-century Armenia has attracted little in the way of sustained research or scholarly analysis. Quite why this should be so is impossible to answer with any degree of confidence, for as shall be demonstrated below, it is not for want of contemporary sources. It may perhaps be linked to the formative phase of modern Armenian historical scholarship, in the second half of the nineteenth century, and its dominant mode of romantic nationalism. The accounts of political capitulation by Armenian kings and princes and consequent annexation of their territories by a resurgent Byzantium sat very uncomfortably with the prevailing political aspirations of the time which were validated through an imagined Armenian past centred on an independent Armenian polity and a united Armenian Church under the leadership of the Catholicos. Finding members of the Armenian elite voluntarily giving up their ancestral domains in exchange for status and territories in Byzantium did not advance the campaign for Armenian self-determination. It is also possible that the descriptions of widespread devastation suffered across many districts and regions of central and western Armenia at the hands of Seljuk forces in the eleventh century became simply too raw, too close to the lived experience and collective trauma of Armenians in these same districts at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, to warrant
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE on the FORMATION of NATIONAL STATEHOOD and POLITICAL IDENTITY “Today Most Armenians Do
    ASHOT ALEKSANYAN THE IMPACT OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ON THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STATEHOOD AND POLITICAL IDENTITY Key words – Armenian Genocide, pre-genocide, post-genocide, national statehood, Armenian statehood heritage, political identity, civiliarchic elite, civilization, civic culture, Armenian diaspora, Armenian civiliarchy “Today most Armenians do not live in the Republic of Armenia. Indeed, most Armenians have deep ties to the countries where they live. Like a lot of us, many Armenians find themselves balancing their role in their new country with their historical and cultural roots. How far should they assimilate into their new countries? Does Armenian history and culture have something to offer Armenians as they live their lives now? When do historical and cultural memories create self-imposed limits on individuals?”1 Introduction The relevance of this article is determined, on the one hand, the multidimen- sionality of issues related to understanding the role of statehood and the political and legal system in the development of Armenian civilization, civic culture and identity, on the other hand - the negative impact of the long absence of national system of public administration and the devastating impact of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 on the further development of the Armenian statehood and civiliarchy. Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey was the first ever large-scale crime against humanity and human values. Taking advantage of the beginning of World War I, the Turkish authorities have organized mass murder and deportations of Armenians from their historic homeland. Genocide divided the civiliarchy of the Armenian people in three parts: before the genocide (pre-genocide), during the genocide and after the genocide (post-genocide).
    [Show full text]
  • ERZURUM İLİ PALANDÖKEN İLÇESİ HÖYÜK VE YERLEŞMELERİ the Mounds and Settlements in Palandöken District of Erzurum Province
    Cilt:5, Sayı:1, Haziran 2020, 98-120 Gönderim Tarihi: 27.12.2019 Kabul Tarihi:30.05.2020 ERZURUM İLİ PALANDÖKEN İLÇESİ HÖYÜK VE YERLEŞMELERİ The Mounds And Settlements In Palandöken District Of Erzurum Province Ayşe Nur MORKOÇ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9931-2159 Çalışmanın Türü: Araştırma Öz Erzurum, Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde stratejik bir konumda bulunmaktadır. Kafkaslardan Anadolu’ya geçiş güzergâhında olan Erzurum, Paleolitik Çağ’da insanların yerleşmeye başladığı bir bölge olmuştur. Ancak yoğun şekilde yerleşim Kalkolitik Çağ sonlarında başlamış ve İlk Tunç Çağı’nda bu yoğunluk daha da artmıştır. Erzurum ve çevresi Eski Çağ Tarihi’nde birçok kültüre ev sahipliği yapmıştır. Bölgede yaptığımız yüzey araştırmaları, özellikle Karaz Kültürü, Diauehi Devleti/Beyliği ve Urartu kültürlerinin izlerinin takip edilmesi ve bu kültürlerle ilgili yeni verilerin ortaya koyulması açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada Erzurum ili Palandöken ilçesinde yapılan yüzey araştırmaları değerlendirilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Erzurum, Palandöken, Karaz Kültürü, İlk Tunç Çağı,Diauehi,Urartu. Abstract Erzurum takes place in a strategic location in the Northeast Anatolia Region. Erzurum, which is on the transition route from the Caucasus to Anatolia, has been a region where people started to settle in the Paleolithic Age. However, the settlement started intensely at the end of the Chalcolithic Age and this density increased even more during the Early Bronze Age. Erzurum and its surroundings hosted various cultures in Ancient History. The surface surveys we have done in the region are especially important in terms of following the traces of Karaz Culture, Diauehi State/Principality and Urartu cultures and revealing new data about these cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • STRENGTHENING CONNECTIONS and BUSINESS SYNERGIES BETWEEN TURKEY and ARMENIA Towards a Roadmap for Confidence Building Through Economic Cooperation
    tepav The Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey November2014 R201410 EPORT R STRENGTHENING CONNECTIONS AND BUSINESS SYNERGIES BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA Towards a Roadmap for Confidence Building Through Economic Cooperation This document has been prepared by the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey (TEPAV), a team consisting of Esen Çağlar1, Ussal Şahbaz2, Ali Sökmen, Feride İnan3, İpek Beril Benli and İrem Kızılca4. TEPAV conducted a fact-finding mission to Yerevan between November 11 and November 14, 2013. Twenty-five meetings were held with a variety of non-governmental organizations, think- tanks and research institutes, multilateral institutions and business people—including the VIP Tourism & Narekavank Tourism Agency—the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of Armenia (UMBA), Noyan Natural Juice Factory, Union of Information Technology Enterprises, Apaven Co. LTD, EV Consulting, the World Bank Group, International Center for Human Development, TOSP Knitting Factory, Caucasus Research Resource Center Armenia (CRRC), Armenia Institute of Tourism, Analytical Center on Globalization and Regional Cooperation, Public Journalism Club, National Competitiveness Foundation of Armenia (NCFA) and USAID. We would like to extend a special thanks to the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of Armenia for its contributions throughout TEPAV’s field study in Armenia and all other parties who shared their valuable insights and offered their generous support in the preparation of this report. 1 http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/ekibimiz/s/1025/Esen+Caglar 2 http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/ekibimiz/s/1190/Ussal+Sahbaz 3 http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/ekibimiz/s/1298/Feride+Inan 4 http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/ekibimiz/s/1300/Irem+Kizilca www.tepav.org.tr 1 STRENGTHENING CONNECTIONS AND BUSINESS SYNERGIES BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA Towards a Roadmap for Confidence Building Through Economic Cooperation Executive Summary In the past two decades, relations between Armenia and Turkey have been left in diplomatic limbo.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Country Study
    Initiative on Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children This report was prepared by an independent expert as part of the Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children with support from R.T. Ministry of National Education Directorate General for Basic Education and UNICEF Turkey under the Govern- ment of Republic of Turkey – UNICEF 2011-2015 Country Programme Action Plan. The statements in this report are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of National Education or UNICEF. ISBN: 978-92-806-4725-9 Cover Image: © UNICEF/NYHQ2005-1203/LeMoyne A girl removes laundry from the line at a camp for migrant workers near the city of Adana-Turkey. Contents Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................................................7 List of Tables and Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................9 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia
    The Churches of Mtskheta: Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia Samantha Johnson Senior Art History Thesis December 14, 2017 The small town of Mtskheta, located near Tbilisi, the capital of the Republic of Georgia, is the seat of the Georgian Orthodox Church and is the heart of Christianity in the country. This town, one of the oldest in the nation, was once the capital and has been a key player throughout Georgia’s tumultuous history, witnessing not only the nation’s conversion to Christianity, but also the devastation of foreign invasions. It also contains three churches that are national symbols and represent the two major waves of church building in the seventh and eleventh centuries. Georgia is, above all, a Christian nation and religion is central to its national identity. This paper examines the interaction between incoming foreign cultures and deeply-rooted local traditions that have shaped art and architecture in Transcaucasia.1 Nestled among the Caucasus Mountains, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, present-day Georgia contains fewer than four million people and has its own unique alphabet and language as well as a long, complex history. In fact, historians cannot agree on how Georgia got its English exonym, because in the native tongue, kartulad, the country is called Sakartvelo, or “land of the karvelians.”2 They know that the name “Sakartvelo” first appeared in texts around 800 AD as another name for the eastern kingdom of Kartli in Transcaucasia. It then evolved to signify the unified eastern and western kingdoms in 1008.3 Most scholars agree that the name “Georgia” did not stem from the nation’s patron saint, George, as is commonly thought, but actually comes 1 This research addresses the multitude of influences that have contributed to the development of Georgia’s ecclesiastical architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide of Georgia Facts About Georgia
    GUIDE OF GEORGIA Cycles of Higher Education Higher Education system of Georgia consists of three cycles: First Cycle-Bachelor’s Degree (240 credits); Second Cycle-Master’s Degree (120 credits); Third Cycle-Doctor’s Degree (180 credits) Higher Education Institutions Georgia is a popular destination for students from around the world, wishing to gain a top-quality education. Each year more and more students take courses in Georgia and fill the contingent of international students to already significant contingent in the whole country. The following are the higher education institutions in Georgia: College – higher education institution implementing professional higher educational programs or/and only the first cycle programs –Bachelor programs; Educational University-higher education institution implementing higher educational program/programs (except for doctoral programs). It is required to provide the second Cycle-Master educational program/programs; University –higher education institution implementing educational programs of all the three cycles of the highest academic education. Quality Assurance External quality assurance in Georgia lies through accreditation process. Accreditation is conducted by National Education Accreditation Centre www.nea.ge The state recognizes the qualification documents issued only by an accredited educational institution or equalized to it. FACTS ABOUT GEORGIA Local name: "Sakartvelo" / Georgia Capital city: Tbilisi Area: 69,700 sq. km Location: It lies between the Black and Caspian Seas, on the south of the Caucasus, bordered by Russia in the north; Armenia, Turkey in the south, Azerbaijan – in the south-east. Population: 4,7 million Native language: Georgian Currency: Lari (Gel) Calling code: +995; the area code of Tbilisi is 322 Area: 69,700 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of Christianity in the Eastern Black Sea Littoral (Written and Archaeological Sources)*
    9863-07_AncientW&E_09 07-11-2007 16:04 Pagina 177 doi: 10.2143/AWE.6.0.2022799 AWE 6 (2007) 177-219 THE SPREAD OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE EASTERN BLACK SEA LITTORAL (WRITTEN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOURCES)* L.G. KHRUSHKOVA Abstract This article presents a brief summary of the literary and archaeological evidence for the spread and consolidation of Christianity in the eastern Black Sea littoral during the early Christian era (4th-7th centuries AD). Colchis is one of the regions of the late antique world for which the archaeological evidence of Christianisation is greater and more varied than the literary. Developments during the past decade in the field of early Christian archaeology now enable this process to be described in considerably greater detail The eastern Black Sea littoral–ancient Colchis–comprises (from north to south) part of the Sochi district of the Krasnodar region of the Russian Federation as far as the River Psou, then Abkhazia as far as the River Ingur (Engur), and, further south, the western provinces of Georgia: Megrelia (Samegrelo), Guria, Imereti and Adzhara (Fig. 1). This article provides a summary of the literary and archaeological evidence for the spread and consolidation of Christianity in the region during the early Christ- ian era (4th-7th centuries AD).1 Colchis is one of the regions of late antiquity for which the archaeological evidence of Christianisation is greater and more varied than the literary. Progress during the past decade in the field of early Christian archaeology now enables this process to be described in considerably greater detail.2 The many early Christian monuments of Colchis are found in ancient cities and fortresses that are familiar through the written sources.3 These include Pityus (modern Pitsunda, Abkhazian Mzakhara, Georgian Bichvinta); Nitike (modern Gagra); Trakheia, which is surely Anakopiya (modern Novyi Afon, Abkhazian Psyrtskha); Dioscuria/ * Translated from Russian by Brent Davis.
    [Show full text]