DOCSLIB.ORG

Cabinet of Armenia, 1920

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects. No forms of bigotry will be permitted. The period of history in which this committee is set may be tragic at times, but it includes timely lessons that are more important today than ever. If you have questions about what conduct is and isn’t acceptable, feel free to email me at With all of that being said, Model UN should be an activity that is, first and foremost, fun! We hope that you will work collaboratively and honestly, and that you will leave this committee with new friends and new interests. All the best, Andre Altherr 3 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR ______________________________________________________ Howdy everybody! My name is Devin, and I am very excited to be your Chair! I’m from St. Louis, Missouri by way of Davis, California, but I am now a second-year at UChicago studying political anthropology, international relations, and screen-writing. Outside of classes, I work as a research assistant for an environmental anthropologist. I’ve spent my summers working for EducationUSA Mexico City, the Chris Koster for Missouri Governor campaign (RIP), a WashU ecologist, and a St.-Louis-based pizza law firm (ask me what “pizza law” is, I dare you). Beyond work and academics, I enjoy such totally-normal hobbies as growing hundreds of carnivorous plants and orchids, watching foreign films and movie musicals, and seeing just how inexpensively I can backpack other countries without getting myself killed. And hiking and rock- climbing, but those are more unironically normal. I genuinely love Model United Nations as an activity, and I am a believer in its ability to inspire substantive interests and effect communicative skills. I went to MUNUC as a delegate three times while in high school, and I can genuinely say it changed my life. Before I went my first time, I had never heard of the University of Chicago and thought I wanted to be a botanist. At MUNUC, though, I fell in love with international politics, and I now dream of working in embassies rather than greenhouses. It is also largely responsible for my interest in UChicago, and I couldn’t be happier that I’m here now. Going to MUNUC each year was one of the highlights of my high school years; I looked forward to next year’s MUNUC as soon as closing ceremony ended, and it was the prospect of going the coming year that kept me going through the summer jobs I worked to pay my way. I want to make MUNUC as meaningful for you as it was for me. 4 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 I had a wonderful experience working as an AC on the MUNUC XXXI Cabinet of Chile last year, and I can’t wait to chair this committee! This committee will deal with mature themes often avoided in high school conferences, but Andre and I trust that you will treat this topic with the respect, dignity, and empathy that it deserves. If you have any concerns or committee questions, feel free to shoot me an email at [email protected]. I can’t wait to meet all of y’all and look forward to a hoot of a conference! Cheers, Devin A. Haas 5 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 The History of Armenia Iranian Eastern Armenia: 1502-1828 While history of Armenia arguably begins with Urartu, the first Armenian kingdom, it existed almost 2,800 years before this committee begins. While ancient Armenia is fascinating, this background guide will focus on modern Armenian history, beginning in the 16th Century. Armenia and the rest of the Caucuses were the object of both Ottoman and Persian ambitions, leading to frequent wars and partitions during this period. Yerevan changed hands fourteen times between 1513 and 1737 alone.1 In the early 1600s, Shah Abbas, initially greeted by Armenians as a liberator from the Ottomans, began a scorched-earth campaign to destroy Armenian land and forcibly displace Armenians to complicate future Ottoman invasions. As part of this displacement, thousands of Armenians were ordered to march to Persia; only one-fifth survived these marches.2 However, following the 1639 Treaty of Zuhab, the Ottoman Empire would more or less maintain its claims to Western Armenia, while Persian dynasties would maintain claims to Eastern Armenia. These claims persisted until Russia gained control over the region at the end of this period, although there were still some lingering conflicts.3 While violence, political instability, and corruption led many Armenians to move westward from Western Armenia to Constantinople and to European countries, Persia created two Armenian provinces out of Eastern Armenia and allowed Armenians to develop commercial networks with the outside world, leading to the emergence of a new group of wealthy Armenian merchants and church elite.4 As the Persian Armenian economy expanded, many Armenians developed ties in the Russian economic sphere of influence as Christian Armenians split between two Muslim empires gravitated economically and culturally toward predominantly Christian Russia.5 After Armenian merchants presented Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich with a richly- decorated throne, he granted them the right to monopolize certain sectors of Persian commerce in Russia (like silk), built a Volga port to facilitate commerce, recruited Armenians for the Russian 1 Rachel Goshgarian, “Armenian Global Connections in the Early Modern Period,” in Armenia: Art, Religion, and Trade in the Middle Ages, edited by Helen C. Evans, (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2018), 172. 2 Simon Payaslian, The History of Armenia (New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2007), 106. 3 Payaslian, The History of Armenia, 106. 4 Ibid, 106-107. 5 Ibid, 107. 6 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 bureaucracy, and permitted the construction of Armenian churches within Russia.6 As the Armenian community prospered, religious and secular leaders alike sought to revive a sense of Armenian “nationhood” and sought to secure liberation from Muslim rule; the Armenian Church sent multiple delegations to Europe throughout this period to petition European emperors and popes for support, but to no avail.7 After the Safavid empire fell in 1722 and the Qajars emerged as the new governing power of Persia, prolonged political upheaval prompted many Armenians to move to Moscow and St. Petersburg, and their petitions for national liberation coincided with increasing Russian interests in the Caucuses.8 Russian Eastern Armenia: 1828-1917 As the 19th century dawned, Tsarist Russia became increasingly bullish about imperial expansion into the Caucuses. Following a series of annexations and wars with Persia in the 19th century’s first three decades, tsarist military conquest in the region concluded in 1828 with the Treaty of Turkmenchay, which brokered peace with Persia and gave Russia control of Eastern Armenia and parts of modern-day Azerbaijan and Turkey. While Armenians had been a minority in Eatern Armenia since Timur’s 14th century campaigns, Muslims emigrated to neighboring predominantly Muslim states following the 1828 Treaty, and Russia encouraged Armenians from Persia and the Ottoman Empire to settle in Russian Armenia. By 1832, there were an equal number of Armenians and Muslims in Armenia. While Armenians were initially hopeful that they would be granted some semblance of autonomy, the tsarist government instead moved to bring it under the control of a centralized Russian state. Tsar Nicholas I moved to reduce the political power of Armenian churches and asserted his authority over the process of choosing clergy. Official discrimination and the denial of equal educational opportunities also came with the new regime9. 6 Ibid, 108. 7 Ibid, 108. 8 Ibid, 109. 9 Richard G. Hovannisian. “Russian Armenia: A Century of Tsarist Rule.” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas Neue Folge, 19(1) March 1971, pp. 31-48. 7 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 Russian rule also brought Armenia into the sphere of European thought and markets. Armenians in Russia had developed a reputation as entrepreneurs and merchants long ago, and capitalism and industrialization finally came home to roost in Russian Armenia. As industries for the production of cotton, copper, leather, and wine developed, so did an Armenian middle class. Armenian businessmen bought up land from the declining Georgian nobility and oil fields in Azerbaijan, adding economic tensions to ethnic and religious ones already existing between Armenians, Georgians, and Azeris10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff
    The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff This study appears as part III of Toumanoff's Studies in Christian Caucasian History (Georgetown, 1963), pp. 277-354. An earlier version appeared in the journal Le Muséon 72(1959), pp. 1-36 and 73(1960), pp. 73-106. The Orontids of Armenia Bibliography, pp. 501-523 Maps appear as an attachment to the present document. This material is presented solely for non-commercial educational/research purposes. I 1. The genesis of the Armenian nation has been examined in an earlier Study.1 Its nucleus, succeeding to the role of the Yannic nucleus ot Urartu, was the 'proto-Armenian,T Hayasa-Phrygian, people-state,2 which at first oc- cupied only a small section of the former Urartian, or subsequent Armenian, territory. And it was, precisely, of the expansion of this people-state over that territory, and of its blending with the remaining Urartians and other proto- Caucasians that the Armenian nation was born. That expansion proceeded from the earliest proto-Armenian settlement in the basin of the Arsanias (East- ern Euphrates) up the Euphrates, to the valley of the upper Tigris, and espe- cially to that of the Araxes, which is the central Armenian plain.3 This expand- ing proto-Armenian nucleus formed a separate satrapy in the Iranian empire, while the rest of the inhabitants of the Armenian Plateau, both the remaining Urartians and other proto-Caucasians, were included in several other satrapies.* Between Herodotus's day and the year 401, when the Ten Thousand passed through it, the land of the proto-Armenians had become so enlarged as to form, in addition to the Satrapy of Armenia, also the trans-Euphratensian vice-Sa- trapy of West Armenia.5 This division subsisted in the Hellenistic phase, as that between Greater Armenia and Lesser Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today
    Volume: 8 Issue: 2 Year: 2011 A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today Ercan Karakoç Abstract After initiation of the glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) policies in the USSR by Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet Union started to crumble, and old, forgotten, suppressed problems especially regarding territorial claims between Azerbaijanis and Armenians reemerged. Although Mountainous (Nagorno) Karabakh is officially part of Azerbaijan Republic, after fierce and bloody clashes between Armenians and Azerbaijanis, the entire Nagorno Karabakh region and seven additional surrounding districts of Lachin, Kelbajar, Agdam, Jabrail, Fizuli, Khubadly and Zengilan, it means over 20 per cent of Azerbaijan, were occupied by Armenians, and because of serious war situations, many Azerbaijanis living in these areas had to migrate from their homeland to Azerbaijan and they have been living under miserable conditions since the early 1990s. Keywords: Karabakh, Caucasia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ottoman Empire, Safavid Empire, Russia and Soviet Union Assistant Professor of Modern Turkish History, Yıldız Technical University, [email protected] 1003 Karakoç, E. (2011). A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 8:2. Available: http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en Geçmişten günümüze Karabağ tarihi üzerine bir değerlendirme Ercan Karakoç Özet Mihail Gorbaçov tarafından başlatılan glasnost (açıklık) ve perestroyka (yeniden inşa) politikalarından sonra Sovyetler Birliği parçalanma sürecine girdi ve birlik coğrafyasındaki unutulmuş ve bastırılmış olan eski problemler, özellikle Azerbaycan Türkleri ve Ermeniler arasındaki sınır sorunları yeniden gün yüzüne çıktı. Bu bağlamda, hukuken Azerbaycan devletinin bir parçası olan Dağlık Karabağ bölgesi ve çevresindeki Laçin, Kelbecer, Cebrail, Agdam, Fizuli, Zengilan ve Kubatlı gibi yedi semt, yani yaklaşık olarak Azerbaycan‟ın yüzde yirmiye yakın toprağı, her iki toplum arasındaki şiddetli ve kanlı çarpışmalardan sonra Ermeniler tarafından işgal edildi.
    [Show full text]
  • Asala & ARF 'Veterans' in Armenia and the Nagorno-Karabakh Region
    Karabakh Christopher GUNN Coastal Carolina University ASALA & ARF ‘VETERANS’ IN ARMENIA AND THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH REGION OF AZERBAIJAN Conclusion. See the beginning in IRS- Heritage, 3 (35) 2018 Emblem of ASALA y 1990, Armenia or Nagorno-Karabakh were, arguably, the only two places in the world that Bformer ASALA terrorists could safely go, and not fear pursuit, in one form or another, and it seems that most of them did, indeed, eventually end up in Armenia (36). Not all of the ASALA veterans took up arms, how- ever. Some like, Alex Yenikomshian, former director of the Monte Melkonian Fund and the current Sardarapat Movement leader, who was permanently blinded in October 1980 when a bomb he was preparing explod- ed prematurely in his hotel room, were not capable of actually participating in the fighting (37). Others, like Varoujan Garabedian, the terrorist behind the attack on the Orly Airport in Paris in 1983, who emigrated to Armenia when he was pardoned by the French govern- ment in April 2001 and released from prison, arrived too late (38). Based on the documents and material avail- able today in English, there were at least eight ASALA 48 www.irs-az.com 4(36), AUTUMN 2018 Poster of the Armenian Legion in the troops of fascist Germany and photograph of Garegin Nzhdeh – terrorist and founder of Tseghakronism veterans who can be identified who were actively en- tia group of approximately 50 men, and played a major gaged in the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (39), but role in the assault and occupation of the Kelbajar region undoubtedly there were more.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE on the FORMATION of NATIONAL STATEHOOD and POLITICAL IDENTITY “Today Most Armenians Do
    ASHOT ALEKSANYAN THE IMPACT OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ON THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STATEHOOD AND POLITICAL IDENTITY Key words – Armenian Genocide, pre-genocide, post-genocide, national statehood, Armenian statehood heritage, political identity, civiliarchic elite, civilization, civic culture, Armenian diaspora, Armenian civiliarchy “Today most Armenians do not live in the Republic of Armenia. Indeed, most Armenians have deep ties to the countries where they live. Like a lot of us, many Armenians find themselves balancing their role in their new country with their historical and cultural roots. How far should they assimilate into their new countries? Does Armenian history and culture have something to offer Armenians as they live their lives now? When do historical and cultural memories create self-imposed limits on individuals?”1 Introduction The relevance of this article is determined, on the one hand, the multidimen- sionality of issues related to understanding the role of statehood and the political and legal system in the development of Armenian civilization, civic culture and identity, on the other hand - the negative impact of the long absence of national system of public administration and the devastating impact of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 on the further development of the Armenian statehood and civiliarchy. Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey was the first ever large-scale crime against humanity and human values. Taking advantage of the beginning of World War I, the Turkish authorities have organized mass murder and deportations of Armenians from their historic homeland. Genocide divided the civiliarchy of the Armenian people in three parts: before the genocide (pre-genocide), during the genocide and after the genocide (post-genocide).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Varujan Vosganian, the Book of Whispers
    Varujan Vosganian, The Book of Whispers Chapters seven and eight Translation: Alistair Ian Blyth Seven ‘Do not harm their women,’ said Armen Garo. ‘And nor the children.’ One by one, all the members of the Special Mission gathered at the offices of the Djagadamard newspaper in Constantinople. They had been selected with care. The group had been whittled down to those who had taken part in such operations before, working either alone or in ambush parties. ‘I trust only a man who has killed before,’ Armen Garo had declared. They were given photographs of those they were to seek out, wherever they were hiding. Their hiding places might be anywhere, from Berlin or Rome to the steppes of Central Asia. Broad-shouldered, bull-necked Talaat Pasha, the Minister of the Interior, was a brawny man, whose head, with its square chin and jaws that could rip asunder, was more like an extension of his powerful chest. In the lower part of the photograph, his fists, twice the size of a normal man’s, betokened pugnacity. Beside him, fragile, her features delicate, his wife wore a white dress and a lace cap in the European style, so very different from the pasha’s fez. Then there was Enver, a short man made taller by his boot heels. He had haughty eyes and slender fingers that preened the points of his moustache. He was proud of his army commander’s braids, which, cascading luxuriantly from his shoulders and covering his narrow chest, sought to disguise the humble beginnings of a son whose mother, in order to raise him, had plied one of the most despised trades in all the Empire: she had washed the bodies of the dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Return of Armenian Americans: Per- Spectives
    Karolina Pawłowska: Ethnic return of Armenian Americans: Perspectives Ethnic return of Armenian Americans: Per- spectives Karolina Pawłowska University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznan, [email protected] Abstract The field research conducted among the very few Armenian Americans who have moved to Armenia showed that the phenomena of migration of the diaspora of Armenians to Armenia holds great potential both as a theoretical issue within migration studies and potentially a social phenomenon, as Armenian Americans differ from other migrants and expats in Armenia, because they carry stereotyped pre-images of that land that influence their expectations toward their future lives there. Field research conducted in Armenia in 2012 shows that the disillusionment that repatriation brings causes internal tensions and identity crises, eventually forcing migrants to redefine their role in Armenia in the frame- work of their contribution to the development of their homeland, often isolating them from local Armenians through diaspora practices and maintaining the symbolic boundary between these two groups of Armenians in Armenia. KEYWORDS: diaspora, ethnic return, symbolic boundary, boundary maintenance, so- journers Introduction Both diaspora and specifically the Armenian diaspora are topics well explored in litera- ture (Cohen 2008; Dufoix 2008; Bauböck & Faist 2010; Tölölyan 2012). However, the migration of Armenians from the diaspora to Armenia is not a popular topic among re- searchers and the diaspora of Armenians themselves. The number
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915
    Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 i v ABSTRACT Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Yektan Turkyilmaz 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the conflict in Eastern Anatolia in the early 20th century and the memory politics around it. It shows how discourses of victimhood have been engines of grievance that power the politics of fear, hatred and competing, exclusionary
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Armenian Studies 31 No
    SPECIAL ISSUE: Centenary of the Armenian Resettlement REVIEW OF ARMENIAN STUDIES A Biannual Journal of History, Politics and International Relations 31no: 2015 Sina AKŞİN Uluç GÜRKAN Tal BUENOS Birsen KARACA Sadi ÇAYCI Jean-Louis MATTEI Sevtap DEMİRCİ Armand SAĞ Maxime GAUIN Turgut Kerem TUNCEL Christopher GUNN BOOK REVIEW Michael M. GUNTER Jeremy SALT REVIEW OF ARMENIAN STUDIES A Biannual Journal of History, Politics and International Relations 2015, No: 31 EDITOR Ömer Engin LÜTEM MANAGING EDITOR Aslan Yavuz ŞİR EDITORIAL BOARD In Alphabetical Order Prof. Dr. Seçil KARAL AKGÜN Ömer E. LÜTEM (Ret. Ambassador) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin BAĞCI (Middle East Technical University) Prof. Dr. Nurşen MAZICI (Marmara University) Prof. Dr. Nedret KURAN BURÇOĞLU (Boğaziçi University) Prof. Dr. Nesib NESSİBLİ (Khazar University) Prof. Dr. Sadi ÇAYCI (Başkent University) Prof. Dr. Hikmet ÖZDEMİR (Political Scientist) Prof. Dr. Kemal ÇİÇEK (İpek University) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin PAZARCI Dr. Şükrü ELEKDAĞ Prof. Dr. Mehmet SARAY (Ret. Ambassador) (Historian) Prof. Dr. Temuçin Faik ERTAN Dr. Bilal N. ŞİMŞİR (Institute of History of Turkish Revolution) (Ret. Ambassador, Historian) Dr. Erdal İLTER Dr. Pulat TACAR (Historian) (Ret. Ambassador) Alev KILIÇ (Ret. Ambassador, Director of the Center for Eurasian Studies) ADVISORY BOARD In Alphabetical Order Ertuğrul APAKAN Dr. Ayten MUSTAFAYEVA (Ret. Ambassador) (Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences) Prof. Dr. Edward ERICKSON Jeremy SALT (Historian) Prof. Dr. Norman STONE Prof. Dr. Michael M. GUNTER (Bilkent University) (Tennessee Technological University) Prof. Dr. Ömer TURAN Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU (Middle East Technical University) Prof. Dr. Jean-Louis MATTEI Prof. Dr. Hakan YAVUZ (Historian) (Utah University) Prof. Dr. Justin MCCARTHY (University of Louisville) PUBLISHER Ali Kenan ERBULAN Review of Armenian Studies is published biannually Review of Armenian Studies is a refereed journal.
    [Show full text]
  • History Education in Schools in Turkey and Armenia. a Critique and Alternatives
    History Education in Schools in Turkey and Armenia A Critique and Alternatives Authors: Alişan Akpınar, Sos Avetisyan, Hayk Balasanyan, Fırat Güllü, Işıl Kandolu, Maria Karapetyan, Nvard V. Manasian, Lilit Mkrtchyan, Elif Aköz Özkaya, Hasan Tahsin Özkaya, Garine Palandjian, Ararat Şekeryan, Ömer Turan Editors: Bülent Bilmez, Kenan Çayır, Özlem Çaykent, Philip Gamaghelyan, Maria Karapetyan, Pınar Sayan Istanbul 2019 Yerevan History Education in Schools in Turkey and Armenia A Critique and Alternatives Authors: Alişan Akpınar, Sos Avetisyan, Hayk Balasanyan, Fırat Güllü, Işıl Kandolu, Maria Karapetyan, Nvard V. Manasian, Lilit Mkrtchyan, Elif Aköz Özkaya, Hasan Tahsin Özkaya, Garine Palandjian, Ararat Şekeryan, Ömer Turan Editors: Bülent Bilmez, Kenan Çayır, Özlem Çaykent, Philip Gamaghelyan, Maria Karapetyan, Pınar Sayan Istanbul and Yerevan 2019 This is the revised second edition of this publication. The first version was published in 2017. © History Foundation (Tarih Vakfı) and Imagine Center for Conflict Transformation This publication was prepared using Microsoft Office Word and the cover page design and image belongs to Microsoft Office. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union, within the framework of the programme Support to the Armenia-Turkey Normalisation Process: Stage Two. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the History Foundation (Tarih Vakfı) and its partner the Imagine Center for Conflict Transformation and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. www.armenia-turkey.net One of the workshops that made this publication possible was funded by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. www.fes.de i The History Foundation is a non-governmental organization working in the public interest with the objective of developing and extending history consciousness in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Sevres As the Legal Basis for the Western Armenia’S Territorial Claims to Turkey ***
    Правова система України й міжнародне право, порівняльне правознавство DOI : 10.36695/2219-5521.2.2019.38 УДК 341.01 O.M. POlivAnOvA , A.A. AbrAAMiAn Olena Mykolayivna Polivanova , Ph .D. in Law, Asso - ciate professor of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine * ORCID : 0000-0002-5670-8900 Anna Aramivna Abraamian , master student of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine ** THE TREATY OF SEVRES AS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE WESTERN ARMENIA’S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS TO TURKEY *** Problem statement . History of the Armenian statehood has more than a few thousands of years and it may even be regarded as the oldest in the history of human civilization 1. Armenian statehood took different forms: from Azzi-Hayasa confederation (1500 – 1290 BC) to the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, also known as the Cilician Armenia, Lesser Armenia, or New Armenia 2 (1198–1375). Sources vary on when Armenian statehood was lost. Some scientists suggest that its loss may be dated to 1375 when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia was ceased to exist 3. Others state it was lost in 1045 with the fall of Bagratid Armenia, because Cilician Armenia was outside of the traditional Armenian homeland, while Bagratid Armenia was the last major Armenian state in the Armenian Highlands 4. Nevertheless, since the loss of Armenian statehood at that time, the First Armenian Republic (the Armenian National Council declared the independence of Armenia on 28 May 1918), officially known at the time of its existence as the Democratic Republic of Armenia, was the first mod - ern Armenian state.
    [Show full text]