DOCSLIB.ORG

American University of Armenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American University of Armenia AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA Master’s Essay “Landlockedness as a Challenge for Development: The Case of Armenia” Department of Political Science and International Affairs Student: Narek Harutyunyan Faculty Advisor: Aleksandr Grigoryan Specialization track: International Relations YEREVAN 2015 Acknowledgement I would like to express my immense gratitude to my Faculty Advisor Dr. Aleksandr Grigoryan for his unlimited assistance and encouragement. I am fully convinced that the skills, knowledge and technics that I have learned from my advisor during these months will have their significant contribution to my further professional career. I would also like to thank the whole faculty of the School of Political Science and International Affairs for the huge potential and skills that they developed in me during these two years of study. The analytical and critical skills gained during the study in the program are of highest importance for the academic career in the future. 2 Abstract This research aims to find the main challenges of the landlocked states and identify how the landlockedness affects their development. In this regard, the study uses the following research tools: meta-analysis of the other researches, a two-stage regression analysis of data from World Bank, IMF and UN Datasets, semi-structured in-depth interviews and document analysis of agreements and strategy papers. The findings are grouped in two main parts. The first part discusses the overall development problems of landlocked states, while the second part of the research focuses on Armenia as a landlocked country. The first stage of the analysis shows that the landlockedness creates additional 1070 $ export cost per container. Besides, it identifies that the landlockedness affects country’s development through the export cost by 5.8%. The second part of the research illustrates Armenia’s specific characteristics as a landlocked state. The research concludes that except for several developed landlocked states, their overall level of development is lower than that of the coastal neighbors. The hypothesis is approved because the landlockedness highly affects the export cost and decreases the HDI by 5.8%, which is 1/3 of the HID’s standard deviation. However, the development related issues that Armenia faces are not primarily caused by its landlockedness. 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 4 List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables and Graphs ............................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature Review............................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology and Design .............................................................................................................. 17 Research Questions and Hypothesis ......................................................................................... 17 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 17 Problems Faced by Landlocked States: General Overview .......................................................... 20 Empirical Evidence ....................................................................................................................... 25 Defining Variables .................................................................................................................... 25 Regression Analysis .................................................................................................................. 28 Armenia as a Landlocked State..................................................................................................... 34 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 46 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 49 Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix 1: Countries’ HDI ranking: Average for 2005-2013 ................................................ 57 Appendix 2: Interview Questionnaire ....................................................................................... 65 4 List of Abbreviations FDI – Foreign Direct Investment GDP – Gross Domestic Product GNI – Gross National Income HDI – Human Development Index IMF – International Monetary Fund LLC – Landlocked Countries LLDC – Landlocked Developing Countries PC – Per Capita PPP – Purchasing power parity UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade And Development UN-OHRLLS - United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States USD – US Dollar 5 List of Tables and Graphs Graph 1: GDP of Landlocked states compared to World ……………………………….…….20 Graph 2: Average GDP Per Capita for Landlocked and Non-landlocked states compared to World Average ………………………………………….23 Graph 3: Average HDI for 2009-2013 and Cost to export …………………………………... 29 Graph 4: Average HDI for 2009-2013 and Cost to export …………………………………... 30 Graph 5: Export cost per container in US $ ………………………………………………….. 38 Graph 6: Average % of export products for 2010-2014 ………………………………………40 Graph 7: FDI Net Inflows (% of GDP) ……………………………………………………… 44 Graph 8: HDI for 2005-2013 ………………………………………………………………… 45 Table 1: Average GDP Per Capita of the Landlocked and Maritime States divided by regions ….………………………………………………………. 21 Table 2: The results of the first stage of the regression analysis …….………………………. 31 Table 3: The results of the second stage of the regression analysis ………………………… 32 6 Introduction Even from the ancient times early civilizations were created near the seas or rivers. Since those days, sea transport is considered the cheapest means of transportation. There is no need for the construction of roads in the sea to transport from one place to another. This cheap transportation helps to transfer goods easily and with little cost. Transfer of goods or in other word, trade between the countries is the main indicator of the economic development. Currently around 20% of the states do not have open access to the seas and are considered to be landlocked states. Few landlocked states succeed to overcome the difficulties caused by the fact of not having sea borders and being deprived of this cheap transportation mean. Particularly, these are the European landlocked states, which developed their cooperation with the coastal members and got an opportunity to use their territories as transit easily and steadily without any discrimination or obstacles. A simple glance at the Human Development Index shows that the landlocked economies are mainly concentrated on the lower parts of the index. This suggests that the landlockedness creates specific challenges for the country’s development. Here, a question remains open: how can the landlockedness affect the country’s development? Armenia is among these landlocked countries and faces specific challenges for economic development as well, and, in particular, for international trade, from which the country’s economy is highly dependent. Poor natural resources and absence of alternative transit routes leaves the country with fewer opportunities to develop fully. As a landlocked state, Armenia has a bunch of problems, both specific to the country and general challenges that landlocked economies face. 7 Thus, the aim of the research is to find the answer to the above-mentioned question by finding the path of the impact of having no access to the sea on the country’s development indicators, in particular, in this case on Human Development Index. There are numbers of works done in this topic, however, none of them tried to find the impact of being landlocked on the Human Development Index. The first part of the study is the literature review and the methodological base of the research. This creates a theoretical background for the future analyses. Then, the landlockedness is discussed as a challenge for overall country’s development followed by the econometric analysis of data from the World Bank database. This analysis helps to identify the direct influence of the landlockedness on Human Development Index. In the next stage, the research concentrates on the case of Armenia as a landlocked country and discusses the special characteristics and hardships that the Republic of Armenia face during its economic development. A landlocked, small economy with closed borders with two neighbors and limited opportunities with the third neighbor creates special interest for the analysis. In this part, the study aims to reveal Armenia’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cabinet of Armenia, 1920
    Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 MUNUC 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ Letter from the Crisis Director…………………………………………………3 Letter from the Chair………………………………………….………………..4 The History of Armenia…………………………………………………………6 The Geography of Armenia…………………………………………………14 Current Situation………………………………………………………………17 Character Biographies……………………………………………………....27 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………...37 2 Cabinet of Armenia, 1920 | MUNUC 32 LETTER FROM THE CRISIS DIRECTOR ______________________________________________________ Dear Delegates, We’re very happy to welcome you to MUNUC XXXII! My name is Andre Altherr and I’ll be your Crisis Director for the Cabinet of Armenia: 1920 committee. I’m from New York City and am currently a Second Year at the University of Chicago majoring in History and Political Science. Despite once having a social life, I now spend my free-time on much tamer activities like reading 800-page books on Armenian history, reading 900-page books on Central European history, and relaxing with the best of Stephen King and 20th century sci-fi anthologies. When not reading, I enjoy hiking, watching Frasier, and trying to catch up on much needed sleep. I’ve helped run and participated in numerous Model UN conferences in both college and high school, and I believe that this activity has the potential to hone public speaking, develop your creativity and critical thinking, and ignite interest in new fields. Devin and I care very deeply about making this committee an inclusive space in which all of you feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to challenge yourself to grow as a delegate, statesperson, and human. We trust that you will conduct yourselves with maturity and tact when discussing sensitive subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Low Emission Development Framework of Armenia Transport Sector
    EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIAL AND DIRECTIONS FOR LONG TERM LOW EMISSION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK OF ARMENIA TRANSPORT SECTOR. REPORT BORIS DEMIRKHANYAN YEREVAN 2020 The objective of the report is to outline the assessment of emission reduction potential of Armenia’s transport sector; and to recommend the directions for long term low emission development framework for the sector. This publication has been prepared with the financial support of the European Union. The "EU4Climate" UNDP-EU regional program is held liable for the content, and the views and opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. "EU4Climate" UNDP-EU regional program CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Climate Change and GHG emission ............................................................................................. 3 3. Transport Sector ............................................................................................................................ 6 4. Armenia Transport Sector ............................................................................................................. 7 4.1. Infrastructure....................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2. Fleet ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zvartnots Airport Expansion Project (Phase 2) (Armenia)
    Extended Annual Review Report Project Number: 43922 Investment/Loan Number: 7308/2620 October 2013 Loan Zvartnots Airport Expansion Project (Phase 2) (Armenia) In accordance with ADB’s public communication policy (PCP, 2011), this extended annual review report excludes information referred to in paragraph 67 of the PCP. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – dram (AMD) At Appraisal At Project Completion 13 February 2010 30 August 2012 AMD1.00 – $0.00262 $0.00244 $1.00 – AMD381.50 AMD409.36 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AIA – Armenia International Airports AmIA – American International Airports DEG – Deutsche Investitions-und Entwicklungsgesellchaft EAP – environmental action plan EBITDA – earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECG – Evaluation Cooperation Group EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan EROIC – economic return on invested capital ICAO – International Civil Aviation Organization IEE – initial environmental examination OSPF – Office of the Special Project Facilitator RAP – resettlement action plan ROIC – return on invested capital RRP – report and recommendation of the President WACC – weighted average cost of capital ZIA – Zvartnots International Airport NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Armenia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2010 ends on 31 December 2010. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. Vice-President L. Venkatachalam, Private Sector and Cofinancing Operations Director General T. Freeland, Private Sector Operations Department (PSOD) Director M. Barrow, Infrastructure Finance Division 1, PSOD Team leader E. Gregori, Unit Head, Project Administration, PSOD Team member s H. Cruda, Senior Safeguards Specialist, PSOD S.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Galstyan Iom15years in Armenia.Pdf
    15 YEARS IN ARMENIA: MANAGING MIGRATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL YEREVAN - 2008 the migration agency ARMENIA About the International Organization for Migration The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is an inter-governmental organization with 125 Member States and 16 Observer States (July 2008). Established in 1951, IOM has become the principal intergovernmental organization in the field of migration. After half a century of worldwide operational experience the Organization has assisted over 11 million migrants. Prepared by Kristina Galstyan IOM's structure is highly decentralized and service-oriented. Design by Nelly Margaryan Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, IOM currently operates in over 400 offices worldwide, managing more than 1,770 projects. Prepared for publication by the IOM Project Development and Implementation Unit in Armenia IOM has 5,600 operational staff and a programme budget of over US$ 783.8 million. IOM is committed to the principle that human and orderly Publisher: International Organization for Migration migration benefits migrants and society. IOM works closely with governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental partners, as © Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be well as the research community and the private sector, to help ensure reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any the orderly and humane management of migration, to promote means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise international cooperation on migration issues, to assist in the search without the prior written permission of the author and publisher. for practical solutions to migration problems and to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants in need, be they refugees, displaced persons or other uprooted people.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview
    EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Armenia Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/02 Date of Edition 01/04/2020 LSSIP Focal Point Samvel Baghdasaryan - [email protected] – ARMATS LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioară - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] FAB Performance Plan Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] LSSIP Year 2019 Armenia - Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Conservation News, Summer 2005 English Pdf 2.06 MB
    No. 39 Summer 2005 In this issue: • Special Section Conservation in the Caucasus: Spotlight on Armenia • Ten Years of “March for Parks” in Russia • A Historic Park on the Shores of the Black Sea PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA Conservation in the Caucasus: Spotlight on Armenia Conservation in the Caucasus: Spotlight on Armenia By Way of an Introduction onservationists around the world Cwidely recognize the Caucasus region as one of the Earth’s most biologically diverse. Boasting high species richness and levels of endemism, among other exceptional characteristics, this mountainous region between the Black and Caspian Seas is globally important for biodiversity conservation. In the upcoming section of this thirty-ninth issue of Russian Conservation News, we spotlight one of the countries at the heart of this special region: Armenia. The following pages of the journal offer a rounded conservation profile of the country, including descrip- tions of its varied landscapes and rich biodiversity. Although the pres- ent Armenian state is no larger than Russia’s Lake Baikal, its landscapes are remarkably diverse, including semi-desert, juniper sparse forest, broadleaf forest, mountain steppe, and sub-alpine meadow habitats. These habitats harbor many rare species, such as the Persian leopard, which stealthily prowls Armenia’s southern regions. In this section, you will read about the research work of A view from Armenia’s highest peak, Mt. Aragats. two dedicated Armenian scientists to Photo by C. Santore. research and protect this extremely rare and elusive cat. We also offer an report on the deforestation threat, one of the country’s protected nature article on work conducted under the which emerged most noticeably after areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Tourism Fdi in Armenia
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Foreign Direct Investment Sector Scan Tourism in Armenia Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IN PARTNERSHIP WITH 1 Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 2. ABOUT THIS REPORT ................................................................................................. 6 Armenia’s Strategy for the Tourism Sector .............................................................................................. 7 Potential Impact of FDI ............................................................................................................................. 8 3. TOURISM FDI IN ARMENIA ...................................................................................... 10 Tourism FDI Trends Globally and in Selected ECA Countries ................................................................. 10 4. FDI SECTOR SCAN .................................................................................................... 13 Methodology Overview .......................................................................................................................... 13 Subsector Scores .................................................................................................................................... 17 Descriptions of Priority Subsectors ........................................................................................................ 20 Aligning with Tourist
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - a Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine
    UNDP/UNEP “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services” Technical Assistance Project The report is prepared for United Nations Development Programme in Armenia within the frame of the project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia”. The project is funded under umbrella of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) joint global Poverty and Environment Initiative (PEI) and aims to contribute to poverty reduction and improved well-being of poor and vulnerable groups through mainstreaming the environment into national development processes Ecosystem Services and their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - A Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine Final Report February 2014 This report has been developed in the scope of UNDP/UNEP join joint TA Project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia” Implementing agency UNDP UNDP EG Portfolio Analyst Armen Marirosyan UNDP Programme Policy Adviser, EG portfolio, Project Georgi Arzumanyan coordinator UNDP Project Assistant Kristina Tereshchatova Project team: Project international consultant Camille Bann Project task leader Anastas Aghazaryan Project experts Davit Androyan Vram Tevosyan Lothar Guendling Georgi Fayvush Hrant Avetisyan Armen Amiryan Aida Tarloyan Armen Ghazaryan Arman Kandaryan Mikayel Avagyan Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str., 0010 Yerevan, Armenia UNDP Armenia Tel: (374 60) 530000; Fax: (+374 10) 543811 Web Site: http://www.am.undp.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 List of abbreviations EIE Environmental Impact Expertise
    [Show full text]
  • With ARMSWISSBANK for Republic of Armenia 10 January 2020 | Strategic Frameworks
    with ARMSWISSBANK for Republic of Armenia 10 January 2020 | Strategic Frameworks Programme title: Scaling up Green Finance practices in the Republic of Armenia Country: Republic of Armenia National designated authority: Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Armenia Implementing Institution: “ARMSWISSBANK” CJSC Date of first submission: 31 August 2019 Date of current submission/ 15 November 2019 V.2 version number Readiness and Preparatory Support Page 2 of 23 How to complete this document? - Please visit the Empowering Countries page of the GCF website to download the Readiness Guidebook and learn how to access funding under the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme. - This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDA) or focal points with support from their Delivery Partners where relevant. Once completed, this document should be submitted to the GCF by the NDA or focal point to [email protected]. - Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal. - If the Delivery Partner implementing the Readiness support is not a GCF Accredited Entity for project Funding Proposals, please complete the Financial Management Capacity Assessment (FMCA) questionnaire and submit it prior to or with this Readiness proposal. The FMCA is available for download at the Library page of the GCF website. Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. - You can also complete as much of this document as you can and then send it to [email protected], copying both the Readiness Delivery Partner and the relevant GCF Country Dialogue Specialist and Regional Advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • <Div Style="Position:Absolute;Top:293;Left
    RA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE YEREVAN STATE LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY AFTER V. BRUSOV LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ARMENIA YEREVAN 2008 The report was prepared within the framework of Armenia-Council of Europe cooperation The group was established by the order of the RA Minister of Education and Science (N 210311/1012, 05.11.2007) Members of the working group Souren Zolyan – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor Yerevan Brusov State Linguistic University (YSLU), Rector, National overall coordinator, consultant Melanya Astvatsatryan– Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor YSLU, Head of the Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology Project Director (Chapters 1-3; 5; 10; 12) Aida Topuzyan – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Docent YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapter 8.2 – 8.5, 9.4) Nerses Gevorgyan – Ministry of Education and Science, YSLU, UNESCO Chair on Education Management and Planning (Chapter 11), Head of Chair Gayane Terzyan - YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapters 4; 6; 7; 8.1) Serob Khachatryan – National Institute for Education, Department of Armenology and Socio-cultural Subjects (Chapter 9.1-9.3, 9.5-9.6) Karen Melkonyan, RA MES, Centre for Educational Programmes, Project expert Araik Jraghatspanyan – YSLU, Chair of English Communication, Project translator Bella Ayunts – YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology, Project assistant LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT - ARMENIA I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. PROJECT GOALS 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES 3. REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA General information 3.1. Geographical position 3.2. RA administrative division 3.3. Demographic data 4.
    [Show full text]