DOCSLIB.ORG

State Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Report 16 October 2002 ACFC/SR(2002)003 REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ______ (Received on 16 October 2002) ______ ACFC/SR(2002)003 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF NATIONAL AND ETHNIC COMMUNITIES THE FIRST REPORT BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Submitted pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Belgrade 2002 * * * 2 ACFC/SR(2002)003 THE FIRST REPORT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Submitted pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities 3 ACFC/SR(2002)003 TABLE OF CONTENTS : PART I: INTRODUCTON ................................................................................................. 6 * * * PART II: GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................. 9 1. BASIC HISTORICAL FACTS...................................................................................9 2. BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC FACTS .......................................................................10 3. BASIC ECONOMIC INDICES............................................................................ 14 4. STATUS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW .............................................................. 15 5. BASIC PROBLEMS.............................................................................................16 6. NEW MINORITY POLICY ................................................................................. 18 7. STATUS OF THE ROMA COMMUNITY.......................................................... 22 8. FEDERAL LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (2002) .................................................................................. 23 * * * PART III : IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION................ 25 Article 1............................................................................................................................. 25 Article 2............................................................................................................................. 29 Article 3............................................................................................................................. 31 Article 4............................................................................................................................. 34 Article 5............................................................................................................................. 41 Article 6............................................................................................................................. 55 Article 7............................................................................................................................. 61 Article 8............................................................................................................................. 65 Article 9............................................................................................................................. 70 Article 10........................................................................................................................... 81 Article 11........................................................................................................................... 90 Article 12........................................................................................................................... 93 Article 13......................................................................................................................... 100 Article 14......................................................................................................................... 102 Article 15......................................................................................................................... 107 Article 16......................................................................................................................... 111 Article 17......................................................................................................................... 113 Article 18......................................................................................................................... 116 Article 19......................................................................................................................... 117 Article 20......................................................................................................................... 118 Article 21......................................................................................................................... 118 Article 22......................................................................................................................... 118 Article 23......................................................................................................................... 119 Article 30......................................................................................................................... 119 4 ACFC/SR(2002)003 * * * PART IV : APPENDIX I ................................................................................................121 Minority communities : Characteristics and basic data .................................................. 121 1. Minority communities Characteristics and basic data................................................121 A l b a n i a n s................................................................................................................. 121 B o s n i a c s / M u s l i m s ............................................................................................124 B u l g a r i a n s............................................................................................................... 125 B u n y e v t s i................................................................................................................. 127 C r o a t s ......................................................................................................................... 128 H u n g a r i a n s ............................................................................................................. 129 G e r m a n s .................................................................................................................... 134 R o m a n i a n s............................................................................................................... 135 R u t h e n i a n s.............................................................................................................. 137 R o m a ............................................................................................................................ 138 S l o v a k s ...................................................................................................................... 142 U k r a i n i a n s .............................................................................................................. 145 V l a c h s......................................................................................................................... 145 Smaller minority communities contributing to FR Yugoslavia's multiculturalism ........146 2. Regulations governing, or related to, the status of national minorities....................... 148 APPENDIX II : THE MOST IMPORTANT RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE LOCAL LAWS ...............................................................................................................148 1) CONSTITUTIONS..................................................................................................... 148 2) CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA................ 148 3) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA...............................................152 4) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO................................. 155 4) LAWS AND REGULATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO ........... 202 * * * 5 ACFC/SR(2002)003 PART I: INTRODUCTON 1. Pursuant to the provision of Article 29, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (hereinafter: the Framework Convention), FR Yugoslavia was invited by the Council of Ministers to become a Contracting Party to the Framework Convention. Yugoslavia’s becoming a member of the Framework Convention should present one of the first steps toward its membership in the Council of Europe. In response to that invitation, Yugoslavia became a Contracting Party to the Framework Convention on May 11, 2001, and, in accordance with the provision of Article 29, paragraph 2, of that document, it came into force for Yugoslavia on September 1, 2001. Pursuant to the provision of Article 25, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention, the Contracting Parties are obliged, within a year from its coming into force, to submit to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe full information on legislative and other measures undertaken for the application of the principles enshrined in the Framework Convention. In the case of Yugoslavia, that report (hereinafter: the Report) is due on September 1, 2002, i.e., a year after the Framework Convention came into force for FR Yugoslavia. Thus, this Report is being submitted within the prescribed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Do Not Let Belgrade Drown (Ne Davimo Beograd)
    Č Š ć Do not let Belgrade drown (Ne davimo Beograd) Initiative Do not let Belgrade drown was form in 2014 to oppose the Belgrade Waterfront’s project, the consequences and the way the process of planning and the legalizing the project was carried out. It attracted a number of associations, independent organizations, experts, lawyers, academics, journalists, architects and urban planners. Our idea is to stress the importance of popular participation in the development of the city We believe that is possible to build a new kind of solidarity and civic mobilization Giant Duck Becomes Belgrade Resistance Symbol Small-scale actions were followed by mass protests in 2015 and at the beginning of 2016. The watershed moment followed the demolitions of 25 April 2016, when citizens showed up in great numbers to protest, demanding resignations and laying criminal responsibility at the door of officials. We led the biggest civic protests since those that toppled Slobodan Milošević in 2000. Movement transformed into political organization which participated in the local elections. Key achievement is positioning of the topics of urban development and citizen participation in decision making process as one of most important issues in public sphere in Belgrade. Local elections, march 2018. We independently took part in Belgrade elections on March 4, 2018 as a citizen list under the name "Initiative Do not let Belgrade drown - Yellow Duck - Our City, Our City - Ksenija Radovanovic", presenting a program of 20 points. Support was provided by other local movements from Serbia, as well as Janis Varufakis, DIEM25, Ada Colau, Ska Keller, “Zagreb je nas” movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Football and Politics
    m r < H < | £ f J t # Xi'.r f * Sanja Pereša - Macuka / i • Igor Jovanović •i I , r I rr 4 * » •* tPj' / *. •1 r#’ 11/ i i .1 •.1 Football and Cvv i » . ) i. t.u|*, ri .1 i politics i 2 , t • •• •L 7T ; f r £k I ,1 » » •it J l if U?.' Zf t »t / i i •, 9 •?: *.j •iM r I I * « 4 > ir f - ( 9 ,\ 1.: * t ' t KU ; .«l'i :A‘ I / * 3 1* if 14 •* I I 4 / li 4 , |• * 4 I "A :-i: * 4 I | I 4 1 • : i . t » ) m- 1J£ Hfil # 1 •1* t I I ««• * i I 1 f f 4 I 4 • A .« ;*,I irD 4 11 i j* ! . 4/ 4 if an! • | f ft ) i / * i * H * 4 f « i jii t i i i f ;/ i t i I r i 4 0 * f It / i t # i i « < i •4»tl ( ,1 « 4 4 l » M« l 1 # 4 r r # *" # . 4 ' k # I # f <* *1 ' ft 1 f » I % # $ r X “ 1 4 l \ i i M -1 6&. > 1 fw * I J a*i »! A ’>1 i > i o K « * A •I * A t. 7 n IM K y 4 ri r 4 MT i nil I ( ( / > >: i / r>V,; dir# c > „ . i • t H' i it f.n » 1 < i « ! . v i j I | v If « 1 I > I t # # > h i ti, 5 JJ 1 i 4 I] . ( * 4 * V: \ * I f 4 4 i Vi i •< r 1 1 MmrA kS ' i f rr.i * 4 i rim I : • ( l f I >> I I if ' \ i \ \ ;• 4 S » »MR t > s a l « J1J i » •i < k % mi .
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE NOTE: This Book Contains Graphic Description of Inhuman Acts
    PLEASE NOTE: This book contains graphic description of inhuman acts committed by a small but unfortunately significant segment of the Serb nation. It is published for the information of politicians, diplomats, historians, soldiers, reporters and other professionals. Not recommended to the general public. To keep one's sanity it should be read with total professional detachment. Please read POSTSCRIPTUM on page 162 before you start reading the book. It will give you basic knowledge and better understanding of the true nature of the Partisan Warfare. The Publisher TITOIST ATROCITIES in VOJVODINA 1944-1945 SERBIAN VENDETTA IN BACSKA TIBOR CSERES HUNYADI PUBLISHING Copyright © Tibor Cseres 1993 All rights reserved First edition in the English Language Hunyadi Publishing Buffalo, NY - Toronto, Ont. Hungarian title: VERBOSSZU BACSKABAN Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 92-76218 ISBN 1-882785-01-0 Manufactured in the United States of America 9 AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION At the end of World War I, the southern part of the thousand year old historical Hungary was occupied by Serbian troops. Under the terms of the Paris Peace Treaty in 1921 it was annexed to the Serbo-Croat-Slovenian Kingdom, that later became Yugoslavia. The new name of this territory, situated to the east of present Croatia, was VOJVODINA (also spelled Voivodina or Voyvodina). Its former Hungarian name had been Bacska and Banat. During World War II, in 1941, Germany occupied Yugoslavia. At the same time, Hungary took possession of and re-annexed VOJVODINA from divided Yugoslavia. At the end of 1944, the Serbs reoccupied Bacska, which has belonged to Serbia ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Prime Site One AG 2 Gonten
    SERBIA PRIME SITE ONE WIRTSCHAFTLICHER BERICHT DES EDA Zusammenfassung Das globale Wachstum dürfte sich in diesem Jahr Der vom damaligen Regierungschef und aktuellem abschwächen, aber schon 2021 allmählich erholen, je- Präsidenten Aleksandar Vucic vor sechs Jahren be - doch sind die Wachstumsaussichten noch immer sehr gonnene Prozess der Restrukturierung der Wirt- ungewiss. Das Hauptrisiko für die Projektion auf kurze schaft und Konsolidierung der Finanzen wird weiter- Sicht ergibt sich aus dem noch zu wenig bekannten hin von der Regierung fortgesetzt. Erklärtes Ziel von Virus und möglichen Störungen bei globalen Ketten. Ministerpräsidentin Ana Brnabic ist, die nötigen Refor- Nach Prognosen des Internationalen Währungsfonds men im Hinblick auf einen EU-Beitritt voranzutreiben. (IWF) wird auch die serbische Wirtschaft in diesem Schwerpunkt der Regierungspolitik bleiben EU-Inte- Jahr vorrausichtlich um drei Prozent des BIP fallen, gration als wichtigstes strategisches Ziel, Digitalisie- könnte aber schon im nächsten Jahr um 7,5 Prozent rung, E-Government, Stabilhaltung der öffentlichen wachsen. Serbien verzeichnete vor der COVID-19 Finanzen, aber auch Fortsetzung der Wirtschafts- Krise ein Wirtschaftswachstum von 5 Prozent in den reformen und der Rechtsstaatlichkeit, insbesondere ersten vier Monaten 2020. Das serbische BIP belief der Unabhängigkeit der Gerichtsbehörden. Die bis- sich 2019 auf 45,9 Milliarden Euro, was einem Anstieg her durchgeführten strukturellen Reformen und Ein- von 4,2 Prozent entspricht. sparungen im Staatshaushalt brachten Serbien auf Wachstumskurs. Serbien verzeichnete zwei Jahre hin- Die makroökonomische Leistung Serbiens blieb 2019 tereinander eine hohe Wachstumsrate - einen Anstieg robust. Das Wachstum wird auf 4,2 Prozent geschätzt, von 4,4% in 2018 und 4,2 % im Jahr 2019. Serbien hat unterstützt durch starke ausländische Direktinvestitio- sich in sechs Jahren zu einer niedrigen Inflations- und nen und boomende Bautätigkeiten.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Market Outlook – 2018
    Residential Market Outlook Belgrade | Jan 2018 Regulated by RICS Regulated by RICS Residential Market Outlook | Jan 2018 | LeRoy Realty Consultants | 1 Serbia’s overall economy health has been reinforced further in 2017, which lifted up the GDP & Construction Industry Growth country’s credit rating from BB- to BB¹, with a 5% stable outlook in December 2017. The outlook 4.0% for this year shows growth accelerating 4% 2.8% 3% 2.8% 2.2% The GDP growth of 1.8% in 2017 was lower than projected, 2% 1.8%* but its structure points toward underlying changes that will 1% shape the economic expansion in the coming years. The 0.8% growth is primarily driven by the increased investment, 0% -0.7% private consumption, exports and FDI. On the other hand, 2014 2015 2016 2017 the growth of the construction industry outperforms that of -1% the local economy in the last 3 years, with positive future -1.8% -2% prospects. Construction industry growth GDP *estimate FDI inflow in 2017 stood at EUR 2.3 billion, which is up by Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 37.5% y-o-y thus exceeding the projection for 2017. The Central Bank has decided to cautiously loosen monetary Unemployment & Salaries policy, to support a boost in domestic economic activity, and 20% 6% decreased its key policy rate at a historic low of 3.5% on 18% Salary growth rate October 2017, which contributed to the decline in the EUR- 16% 4% indexed lending. 14% 3.7% 3.9% 12% 10% 1.4% 2% 8% Elevated levels of business and 6% 0% 4% -0.2% consumer sentiment Unemployment rate 2% 0% -2% Labor market conditions have continued to improve in 2017, 2014 2015 2016 2017 even faster than previously expected, with the Unemployment Salary growth unemployment rate falling to 12.9% in the third quarter of Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 2017, coupled with two consecutive years of wage growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Investigative Mission By
    FACT-FINDING MISSION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AD HOC DELEGATION TO VOÏVODINA AND BELGRADE (29-31 JANUARY 2005) REPORT Brussels, 2 March 2005 DV\559830EN.doc PE 350.475 EN EN CONTENTS Page I.INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 3 II.THE EVENTS......................................................................................................... 5 III.CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 11 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................. 13 PE 350.475 2/20 DV\559830EN.doc EN I. INTRODUCTION Voïvodina, a region in Northern Serbia, is the southern part of the Pannonian plane, bordering with Croatia on the west, Romania on the east and Hungary to the north. The surface area is 21,506 km2, almost as large as Slovenia, with two million inhabitants of some twenty different nationalities. At the end of the IXth century, the Hungarians colonised Voïvodina, which became part of the Kingdom of Hungary and stayed so until the Turkish occupation in 1529. When the latter ended at the turn of the XVII-XVIIIth centuries, Voïvodina was part of the Kingdom of Hungary until 1918. The region's inter-ethnic complexity is rooted in the XVIIIth century Habsburg policy of repopulation, which brought in people from the various nationalities that made up their empire at the time: Serbians fleeing Ottoman rule, Croatians, Hungarians, Germans, Slovaks, Ruthenes, etc. The events of 1848-49 had repercussions in Voïvodina, which was transformed into a region enjoying a modicum of autonomy, with the Emperor François-Joseph bearing the title Voïvode. It was then joined to Hungary in 1860, and then the Austro-Hungarian empire in 1867. Within the Compromise of 1867, Austria and Hungary undertook to treat all the various nationalities on an equal basis, and recognised the equality of all the empire's languages in schools, the administration and public life.
    [Show full text]
  • Banat Educational Households
    Banat Educational Households Banat Educational Households Page 2 of 20 CONTENTS Concept ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Italian example ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Educational household Ferdy .......................................................................................................................... 5 Educational households in Italy ....................................................................................................................... 6 Map............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Educational Household Banatski biser ............................................................................................................... 8 Educational household „Janošičanka“ .............................................................................................................. 10 Educational household Stefanović .................................................................................................................... 12 Educational household Bradvarević ................................................................................................................. 14 Educational household Filipović .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hope Rises for Parents of Missing Babies
    abroad. adoption illegal for hospital out gled smug were -and alive still are children newborn their that suspect Serbia who since. ever happened what out “I Ivana Ivana of Serbia’s first notaries notaries first Serbia’s of election mire Disputes on Continued children. lost their to happened what discover to hope parents of thousands babies, missing on report awaited long- its publishing to readies group working agovernment As babies missing of parents risesfor Hope C Gordana law. the broke process selection the that candidates disappointed by claims back courts ifthe dearly pay Serbia could election process was unfair and illegal. and unfair was process election are ready to take this case to the the to thiscase take to ready are we and law the with in accordance Filipović is one of 6,000 parents in parents 6,000 of isone Filipović “The process was unfair, was not not was unfair, was “The process NIKOLIĆ ANDRIĆ has been struggling to find find to has beenstruggling who Filipović, Goran said birth,” after shortly died she me told doctors the in1998; girl baby my lost trative Court, claiming the the claiming Court, trative Adminis the with charges filed have notaries first asSerbia’s election secure to failed who andidates page 3 Belgrade Belgrade +381 11 4030 306 114030 +381 high-rise high-rise Page 5 - - eyes a eyes future future Thousands of parents in Serbia believe that their children were stolen atbirth. stolen were thattheirchildren inSerbiabelieve Thousands ofparents of forming the Chamber of Notaries. Chamberof the forming of process inthe influence political of cions suspi to notaries, the choose used to commission the that criteria the to dates BIRN.
    [Show full text]
  • LARSON-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf
    THE NEW “OLD COUNTRY” THE KINGDOM OF YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CREATION OF A YUGOSLAV DIASPORA 1914-1951 BY ETHAN LARSON DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Maria Todorova, Chair Professor Peter Fritzsche Professor Diane Koenker Professor Ulf Brunnbauer, University of Regensburg ABSTRACT This dissertation reviews the Kingdom of Yugoslavia’s attempt to instill “Yugoslav” national consciousness in its overseas population of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, as well as resistance to that same project, collectively referred to as a “Yugoslav diaspora.” Diaspora is treated as constructed phenomenon based on a transnational network between individuals and organizations, both emigrant and otherwise. In examining Yugoslav overseas nation-building, this dissertation is interested in the mechanics of diasporic networks—what catalyzes their formation, what are the roles of international organizations, and how are they influenced by the political context in the host country. The life of Louis Adamic, who was a central figure within this emerging network, provides a framework for this monograph, which begins with his arrival in the United States in 1914 and ends with his death in 1951. Each chapter spans roughly five to ten years. Chapter One (1914-1924) deals with the initial encounter between Yugoslav diplomats and emigrants. Chapter Two (1924-1929) covers the beginnings of Yugoslav overseas nation-building. Chapter Three (1929-1934) covers Yugoslavia’s shift into a royal dictatorship and the corresponding effect on its emigration policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Disjointed War: Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999
    Disjointed War Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999 Bruce R. Nardulli, Walter L. Perry, Bruce Pirnie John Gordon IV, John G. McGinn Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Arroyo Center The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under contract number DASW01-01-C-0003. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Disjointed war : military operations in Kosovo, 1999 / Bruce R. Nardulli ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1406.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3096-5 1. Kosovo (Serbia)—History—Civil War, 1998—Campaigns. 2. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Armed Forces—Yugoslavia. I. Nardulli, Bruce R. DR2087.5 .D57 2002 949.703—dc21 2002024817 Cover photos courtesy of U.S. Air Force Link (B2) at www.af.mil, and NATO Media Library (Round table Meeting) at www.nato.int. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE Following the 1999 Kosovo conflict, the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to prepare an authoritative and detailed account of military operations with a focus on ground operations, especially Task Force Hawk.
    [Show full text]