DOCSLIB.ORG

Terry Fox Drive & Cope Drive Commercial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terry Fox Drive & Cope Drive Commercial Terry Fox Drive & Cope Drive Commercial Shopping Development Transportation Impact Assessment Strategy Report September 19, 2018 Prepared for: 98365 Ontario Limited c/o Street Properties Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. TERRY FOX DRIVE & COPE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 TRIP GENERATION TRIGGER ........................................................................................ 1 1.3 LOCATION TRIGGERS .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 SAFETY TRIGGERS ........................................................................................................ 2 1.5 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 SCOPING .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 EXISTING AND PLANNED CONDITIONS ....................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Proposed Development ................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Planned Conditions ....................................................................................... 10 2.2 STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIODS .............................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Time Periods ................................................................................................. 12 2.2.3 Horizon Years ................................................................................................ 12 2.3 EXEMPTIONS REVIEW ................................................................................................. 12 3.0 FORECASTING .............................................................................................................. 13 3.1 DEVELOPMENT-GENERATED TRAVEL DEMAND ...................................................... 13 3.1.1 Trip Generation and Mode Shares ................................................................ 13 3.1.2 Trip Distribution ............................................................................................. 18 3.1.3 Trip Assignment ............................................................................................. 18 3.2 BACKGROUND NETWORK TRAVEL DEMAND ............................................................ 22 3.2.1 Transportation Network Plans ....................................................................... 22 3.2.2 Background Growth ....................................................................................... 22 3.2.3 Other Developments ...................................................................................... 22 3.3 DEMAND RATIONALIZATION ....................................................................................... 22 3.3.1 2020 Future Background Traffic .................................................................... 22 3.3.2 2020 Total Future Traffic ............................................................................... 22 3.3.3 2025 Ultimate Traffic ..................................................................................... 22 4.0 STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.1 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN .............................................................................................. 26 4.1.1 Design for Sustainable Modes ....................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Circulation and Access .................................................................................. 26 4.1.3 New Street Networks ..................................................................................... 26 4.2 PARKING ........................................................................................................................ 26 4.2.1 Parking Supply .............................................................................................. 26 4.2.2 Spillover Parking ............................................................................................ 27 4.3 BOUNDARY STREET DESIGN ...................................................................................... 27 4.3.1 Design Concept ............................................................................................. 27 4.4 ACCESS INTERSECTIONS DESIGN ............................................................................ 29 4.4.1 Location and Design of Access ..................................................................... 29 TERRY FOX DRIVE & COPE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT 4.4.2 Intersection Control ....................................................................................... 29 4.4.3 Intersection Design ........................................................................................ 29 4.5 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ............................................................ 30 4.5.1 Context for TDM ............................................................................................ 30 4.5.2 Need and Opportunity ................................................................................... 30 4.5.3 TDM Program ................................................................................................ 30 4.6 NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ............................................................. 30 4.7 TRANSIT ......................................................................................................................... 30 4.7.1 Route Capacity .............................................................................................. 30 4.7.2 Transit Priority ............................................................................................... 31 4.8 REVIEW OF NETWORK CONCEPT .............................................................................. 31 4.9 INTERSECTION DESIGN ............................................................................................... 31 4.9.1 Intersection Control ....................................................................................... 31 4.9.2 Intersection Design ........................................................................................ 31 5.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 56 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Assumed Land Uses ...................................................................................................... 4 Table 2 - City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan Projects .................................................... 10 Table 3 - Background Developments .......................................................................................... 10 Table 4 - Exemptions Review ..................................................................................................... 12 Table 5 - Vehicle Trip Generation Rates ..................................................................................... 13 Table 6 - Person Trips Generated by Land Use ......................................................................... 14 Table 7 - Trips Generated by Travel Mode ................................................................................. 15 Table 8 - Pass-By Percentages .................................................................................................. 15 Table 9 - Pass-By and Internal Capture Trips ............................................................................. 16 Table 10 - Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................... 18 Table 11 - MMLOS Conditions (Segments) ................................................................................ 28 Table 12 - 2025 Ultimate Access Intersection Operations (Synchro) ......................................... 29 Table 13 - 2018 Existing Intersection Operations (Synchro) ...................................................... 32 Table 14 - 2018 Existing Intersection Operations with Improvements (Synchro) ....................... 33 Table 15 - 2018 Existing MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Fernbank Road) ....................................... 36 Table 16 - 2018 Existing MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Cope Drive) .............................................. 37 Table 17 - 2020 Future Background Intersection Operations (Synchro) .................................... 39 Table 18 - 2020 Future Background MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Fernbank Road) ..................... 42 Table 19 - 2020 Future Background MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Cope Drive) ............................ 43 Table 20 - 2020 Total Future Intersection Operations (Synchro) ................................................ 45 Table 21 - 2020 Total Future MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Fernbank Road) ................................ 48 Table 22 - 2020 Total Future MMLOS (Terry Fox Drive / Cope Drive) ....................................... 49 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Strategy Report
    1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Strategy Report January 17, 2020 Prepared for: Selection Groupe International Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 TRIP GENERATION TRIGGER ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 LOCATION TRIGGERS ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 SAFETY TRIGGERS ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 SCOPING ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 EXISTING AND PLANNED CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Proposed Development .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Budget Title Here
    Transportation Master Plan Ottawa Cycling Plan Ottawa Pedestrian Plan 2013 Review October Consultation Summary Presentation to: Transportation Committee 15 November 2013 Presentation Overview • Summarize feedback from October 2013 consultation process • Identify proposed changes in response to comments • Present additional transit-related details for extending LRT to the suburban town centres outside the Greenbelt 2 Ottawa Pedestrian Plan October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Comments relating to maintenance, operation and design of pedestrian infrastructure • Specific feedback about intersection design, vehicle speeds, and winter maintenance • Changes to Varley Drive and Halton Terrance in the Kanata North 3 Recommended Changes Affordable Pedestrian Projects 4 Ottawa Cycling Plan October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Accessibility concerns • Paved shoulders policies • Visibility of future cycling infrastructure as part of integrated projects • Rideau Canal Footbridge (Fifth Avenue and Clegg Street) • Changes in Barrhaven, Vanier, Sandy Hill, Lowertown, Old Montreal Road, Prince of Wales Drive 5 Recommended Changes Affordable Cycling Projects 6 TMP - Transit October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Greater emphasis on accessibility and Para Transpo • O-Train extension to the Ottawa International Airport • Rapid Transit through the Fernbank Community • More LRT expansion (i.e. Canada Tire Centre, Trim Road, Barrhaven) • Kanata North Bus Rapid Transit extension • West Transitway (Terry Fox Station to March
    [Show full text]
  • Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road) – Recommendations
    1 Report to Rapport au: Transportation Committee Comité des transports 2 May 2018 / 2 mai 2018 and Council et au Conseil 9 May 2018 / 9 mai 2018 Submitted on April 17, 2018 Soumis le 17 avril 2018 Submitted by Soumis par: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports Contact Person Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Director / Directeur, Transportation Planning / Planification des transports, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports (613) 580-2424, 21877, [email protected] Ward: KANATA NORTH (4) / KANATA File Number: ACS2018-TSD-PLN-0002 NORD (4) / STITTSVILLE (6) / BAY (7) / BAIE (7) / COLLEGE (8) / COLLÈGE (8) / KANATA SOUTH (23) / KANATA-SUD (23) SUBJECT: Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road) – Recommendations OBJET: Étude de planification et d’évaluation environnementale du Train léger sur rail proposé vers Kanata (de la promenade Moodie au chemin Hazeldean) – Recommandations 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That Transportation Committee recommend that Council: 1. Approve the functional design for the Kanata Light Rail Transit (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road), as described in this report and supporting documents one and two; and, 2. Direct Transportation Planning staff to initiate the Transit Project Assessment Process in accordance with the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (Regulation 231/08), including the preparation and filing of the Environmental Project Report for final public review and comment. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil : 1. d’approuver la conception fonctionnelle du Train léger sur rail vers Kanata (de la promenade Moodie au chemin Hazeldean), comme présentée dans le présent rapport et dans les documents un à deux; et, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports and Council / et au Conseil November 7, 2013 7 novembre 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0230 SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN, OTTAWA PEDESTRIAN PLAN AND OTTAWA CYCLING PLAN UPDATE – ADDENDUM REPORT OBJET : PLAN DIRECTEUR DES TRANSPORTS, PLAN DE LA CIRCULATION PIÉTONNIÈRE D’OTTAWA ET PLAN SUR LE CYCLISME D’OTTAWA – ADDENDA REPORT RECOMMENDATION That Transportation Committee recommend Council approve the recommended changes identified in this report (Table 1) to the draft Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Pedestrian Plan and Ottawa Cycling Plan that was tabled on October 9, 2013 at the Joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission meeting. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil d’approuver les modifications recommandées et précisées dans le présent rapport (tableau 1) pour la version provisoire du Plan directeur des transports, le Plan de la circulation piétonnière d’Ottawa et le Plan sur le cyclisme d’Ottawa qui ont été déposé le 9 octobre 2013 lors de la réunion conjointe du Comité des transports et de la Commission du transport en commun. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Assumptions and Analysis This is an addendum to the October 9, 2013 joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission staff report (ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0193) to summarize the consultation feedback and proposed changes following the tabling and public release of the draft 2013 Transportation Master Plan (TMP), Ottawa Pedestrian Plan (OPP) and Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP).
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Support Division 2009 Operational Plan
    Network Optimization Final Recommendations Media Briefing April 13, 2011 1 Setting the Stage • On March 23rd we released a draft network optimization proposal designed to achieve $19.5M in annual savings for public input • The public consultation process gave us the valuable customer feedback that has helped us come back with a refined system proposal that better serves the needs of our customers • As a result, over 2/3 of the draft proposal was improved based on this feedback • These recommendations address key issues that were raised during the consultation period while still allowing us to achieve the designated savings of $19.5M annually through network optimization 2 Budget Context • Council approved 2011 Budget, which directed Transit Services to achieve $22M in annualized savings • The 2011 Budget includes free service to seniors Mondays and Fridays from noon onward, continuation of free Wednesdays for seniors and of the U-Pass program, and freezes Community Pass rates at current prices • If network changes are not implemented, our public transit system will demand a property tax increase of at least 5% by 2016 – this represents an additional $145M tax pressure for residents • The 2011 Budget builds on $21M in previous efficiency savings achieved by OC Transpo since 2008 3 Budget Context • Total savings to be realized in 2011 - $7.3M. Total savings on an annualized basis going forward are $22M • Saving of $19.5M annually and $6.5M in 2011 will be achieved as a result of “network optimization” • Savings of $750K will be achieved through internal efficiencies in 2011 • Savings of $2.5M will be realized in 2012 as a result of the purchase of double-decker buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Fox Drive (From Palladium Drive to 330 M West of Campeau Drive)
    Planned Restoration 2017: Terry Fox Drive (From Palladium Drive to 330 m West of Campeau Drive) COMPLETE STREETS OPPORTUNITY FOR ACTION Terry Fox Drive: 1.5 km Restoration Terry Fox Drive: Restoration Overview • Terry Fox Drive (From Palladium Drive to 330 m West of Campeau Drive = 1.3 km) • 2017 Scope of Work: Road resurfacing/renewal • Ward: Kanata South (23) and Kanata North (4) • Budget: Unknown Ecology Ottawa has conducted an initial analysis regarding the City of Ottawa’s planned construction of this street. Keep in mind that no site visit has taken place. The following are potential issues and/or opportunities for change based on preliminary research. We welcome your feedback. Feel free to contact us at: [email protected] Terry Fox Drive Street View (taken October, 2015) Note: No crosswalk for pedestrians at on-ramp Terry Fox Drive Street View (taken Oct, 2015) Note: Busy intersection Complete Streets The City of Ottawa adopted the Complete Streets Implementation Framework on October 14, 2015. Now is the time to act on a community level to make a real impact in your neighbourhood. Use street restorations as an opportunity to implement Complete Streets principles in your area. Encourage a friendly discussion between local residents, community associations, and City Councillors to assess the needs of your street. What Complete Streets do: • Encourage walking and cycling • Enhance road safety • Provide children with safe walking and bicycling routes • Allow people to travel in a variety of ways safely (bike, walk, drive, bus) What is a Complete Street? More info: www.ecologyottawa.ca/complete-streets/ A street that is designed to provide safe and comfortable access for people of all ages, gender, Contact us at: abilities, and modes of travel – including pedestrians, [email protected] cyclists, transit users and motorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. – 2013 Annual Report
    2013 Annual Report Cover Photo: Hydro Ottawa Apprentice Powerline Maintainers get hands-on training along Fernbank Road near Terry Fox Drive in Kanata. Credit: Leon T. Switzer/Front Page Media Group Our Mission Hydro Ottawa’s mission is to create long-term value for our shareholder, benefiting our customers and the communities we serve. Hydro Ottawa is both a community asset and an investment for our shareholder, the City of Ottawa. As a community asset, our goal is to provide effective, efficient and reliable service to our customers, and to be a strong strategic partner for our city, helping to deliver on its economic development and environmental agendas. As an investment, our goal is to provide stable, reliable and growing returns to our shareholder. Table of Contents 1 Company Profile 2 Message to Our Shareholder 5 Financial Highlights 6 Progress Against Plan 21 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 42 Consolidated Financial Statements 83 Statement of Executive Compensation 85 Corporate Governance 89 Members of the Board of Directors 90 Glossary of Terms 2013 Annual Report Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. Company Profile Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. (Hydro Ottawa) is 100 percent owned by the City of Ottawa. It is a private company, registered under the Ontario Business Corporations Act, and overseen by an independent board of Directors consisting of 11 members appointed by City Council. The core businesses of the Corporation are electricity distribution, renewable energy generation and related services. In 2013, Hydro Ottawa owned and operated two subsidiary companies. Hydro Ottawa Limited Hydro Ottawa Limited is a regulated electricity distribution company operating in the City of Ottawa and the Village of Casselman.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance and Economic Development Committee, 29 June 2015
    FINANCE AND ECONOMIC 214 COMITÉ DES FINANCES ET DU DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUE REPORT 6 RAPPORT 6 8 JULY 2015 LE 8 JUILLET 2015 6. STAGE 2 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN REPORT RAPPORT SUR L’ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET LA CONCEPTION FONCTIONNELLE DE L’ÉTAPE 2 DU PROJET DE TRAIN LÉGER COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED That Council: 1. Approve the functional design for the Stage 2 Light Rail Transit (LRT) project as described in this report and detailed in Documents 1,2 and 3; 2. Direct staff to complete the Stage 2 LRT Project Stage 2 LRT Environmental Assessment process and documentation based on the functional design and file the respective Environmental Study Reports in accordance with the Ontario Transit Regulation 231/08; 3. Approve the functional design of the Highway 174/Prescott Russell Road 17 (Hwy 417/Split to Trim Road) Environmental Assessment Study recommendations, as described in Document 2 of this report; 4. Approve a capital budget transfer of $7M in existing funding from the Park and Ride Capital Account # 903278 to the Stage 2 LRT Project (Account # 907926) for the Stage 2 LRT Project preliminary implementation activities as described in this report; 5. Delegate authority to the City Manager and Mayor to engage with the Federal and Provincial Governments on funding for the Stage 2 LRT Project to maximize their contribution to the project; FINANCE AND ECONOMIC 215 COMITÉ DES FINANCES ET DU DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUE REPORT 6 RAPPORT 6 8 JULY 2015 LE 8 JUILLET 2015 6. Direct staff to undertake a review of upcoming City and senior government planned infrastructure works for potential bundling opportunities as part of the Stage 2 Project Contract; and, 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 2140 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment
    2140 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment June 5, 2018 Prepared for: Baseline Constellation Partnership Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2140 BASELINE ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 1 1.2 TRIP GENERATION TRIGGER...................................................................................... 1 1.3 LOCATION TRIGGERS ................................................................................................. 2 1.4 SAFETY TRIGGERS ...................................................................................................... 2 1.5 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 SCOPING ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 EXISTING AND PLANNED CONDITIONS ..................................................................... 3 2.2 STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIODS .............................................................................15 2.3 EXEMPTIONS REVIEW ................................................................................................16 3.0 FORECASTING ............................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • AECOM Appendix Title Pages.Dot
    Appendix I City Council and Committee Agendas and Dispositions • Finance and Economic Development Committee Agenda & Disposition (June 2015) • City Council Agenda & Disposition (July 2015) Finance and Economic Development Committee Agenda & Disposition (June 2015) City Council Agenda & Disposition (July 2015) OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 11 AGENDA 15 WEDNESDAY, 08 JULY 2015 FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 6 OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 7. WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW – INFORMATION AND OPTIONS Wednesday, 08 July 2015, 10:00 a.m. (2015) Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West AGENDA 15 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this report for information. MOMENT OF REFLECTION 8. STAGE 2 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN REPORT NATIONAL ANTHEM Councillor J. Harder COMMITTEE MEETING INFORMATION Delegations: 27 delegations. ANNOUNCEMENTS/CEREMONIAL ACTIVITIES Debate: Committee spent approximately 5 hours on this item. Vote: CARRIED as amended. x Recognition - Mayor's City Builder Award Position of Ward Councillors: City-Wide. x Presentation - Noel Buckley Day Proclamation Position of Advisory Committee: None. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED That Council: ROLL CALL 1. Approve the functional design for the Stage 2 Light Rail Transit (LRT) project as described in this report and detailed in OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 12 OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 13 AGENDA 15 AGENDA 15 WEDNESDAY, 08 JULY 2015 WEDNESDAY, 08 JULY 2015 Documents 1, 2 and 3; 9. Direct staff to fully assess the feasibility and relative priority of rapid
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment – Cost
    Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Public Open House #2 Transportation Services Department December 7, 2017 Agenda • Review study progress • Confirm the Preferred Corridor • Design Alternatives • Light Maintenance and Storage Facility • Preliminary Recommended Plan • Next Steps 1 Context for the Study • Confederation Line nearing completion (2018) • Stage 2 Extension of Confederation Line West to Moodie and Baseline Stations is proceeding (2023) • Strategic opportunity to review possibility of Stage 3 to extend service further west 2 Study Goals • Determine the Preferred Corridor; • Determine the Recommended Plan for LRT alignment and stations; and • Determine project staging and implementation based on future ridership and affordability. 3 Study Schedule Pre-Planning Phase Spring 2017: Existing Conditions & Corridor Selection *Consultation Group Meetings* *Public Open House 1* EA Phase Summer/Fall 2017: Spring 2018: Evaluation of Designs Commence Transit Project *Meet with Stakeholders and Assessment Process Consultation Groups* Fall/Winter 2017: Recommended Plan *Consultation Group Meetings* *Public Open House 2* *Present to Committee and Council* 4 Study Process • Environmental Assessment requirements addressed through Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) • Documented in Environmental Project Report (EPR) 5 What We Heard • Expressed support for Corridor 8 • Do not support Corridor 13 • Consider how to provide a supporting transit network to better serve Kanata & Stittsville • Extend corridor 8
    [Show full text]
  • Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road) – Recommendations
    TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE 47 COMITÉ DES TRANSPORTS REPORT 32 RAPPORT 32 9 MAY 2018 LE 9 MAI 2018 3. KANATA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY (MOODIE DRIVE TO HAZELDEAN ROAD) – RECOMMENDATIONS ÉTUDE DE PLANIFICATION ET D’ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE DU TRAIN LÉGER SUR RAIL PROPOSÉ VERS KANATA (DE LA PROMENADE MOODIE AU CHEMIN HAZELDEAN) – RECOMMANDATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS That Council: 1. Approve the functional design for the Kanata Light Rail Transit (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road), as described in this report and supporting documents one and two; and, 2. Direct Transportation Planning staff to initiate the Transit Project Assessment Process in accordance with the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (Regulation 231/08), including the preparation and filing of the Environmental Project Report for final public review and comment. RECOMMANDATIONS DU COMITÉ Que le Conseil municipal : 1. approuve la conception fonctionnelle du Train léger sur rail vers Kanata (de la promenade Moodie au chemin Hazeldean), comme présentée dans le présent rapport et dans les documents un à deux; et, 2. demande au personnel de la Planification des transports d'amorcer le processus d’évaluation des projets de transport en commun conformément à la Loi sur les évaluations environnementales de l'Ontario (Règlement 231/08), y compris la préparation et le dépôt du TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE 48 COMITÉ DES TRANSPORTS REPORT 32 RAPPORT 32 9 MAY 2018 LE 9 MAI 2018 rapport environnemental sur le projet aux fins de consultation et d'examen final par le public. FOR THE INFORMATION OF COUNCIL The Committee approved the following Direction to Staff: That staff provide the ridership projection from the Kanata Environmental Assessment Study prior to Council on 9 May 2018.
    [Show full text]