Kanata North Transportation Survey Final Report 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kanata North Transportation Survey Final Report 2015 2015 Active Transportation Survey, Final Report TACK Survey Team Transportation Action Committee Kanata Active TransportationNorth 5/25/2015 Survey, Final Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 1 of 128 Authors: David Lee, TACK chairperson David Olson, TACK John Neale, TACK Sefton Haisz, TACK Acknowledgements: The Transportation Action Committee Kanata (TACK) North, would like to acknowledge the following people for their valuable contributions to this survey project: Councillor Marianne Wilkinson, City of Ottawa, Ward 4 Karrie Turner, Councillor's Assistant to Councillor Wilkinson, City of Ottawa, Ward 4, In addition, recognition is extended to all Kanata residents who took part in the pilot survey and in the May 2015 Active Transportation Survey. Disclaimer: The information presented in this report is an information source only. TACK makes no representation or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this report. TACK disclaims all responsibilities for the information and liability for any loss, damage, expense and cost arising from any inaccurate information for any reason. The information may be used freely or reproduced provided the information is properly acknowledged. For more information contact: Councillor Marianne Wilkinson 110 Laurier avenue west Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Canada E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: (613) 580-2474 Fax.: (613) 580-2514 Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 2 of 128 Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 3 of 128 About Transportation Action Committee Kanata (TACK) North The Transportation Action Committee Kanata (TACK) North is a dedicated group of volunteers formed in 2014 by Councillor Marianne Wilkinson as a quasi-independent organization which reviews the transportation needs of Kanata North residents and advocates on behalf of these residents. In cooperation with various city of Ottawa departments, the Committee makes sound recommendations to the Ward Councillor regarding specific aspects of transportation within the boundaries of Kanata North (Ward 4). The aim of TACK is to foster a quality of service that benefits all residents who are users of bus transit, cycling, sidewalks (pedestrians), and roads as their modes of transportation. TACK meets monthly to discuss a wide range of transportation topics and concerns of Kanata North residents. As our communities grows, Kanata North needs to invest significant energy to ensure that we have a comprehensive transportation infrastructure strategy that provides an affordable and accessible transportation option that benefits all residents today and in the future. They include seamless interconnections to all modes of services while maintaining a quality of lifestyle that is truly Canadian. TACK, through the formation of partnerships with the public and business will promote: Reliability of service so as to ease travel to, from and within the community Continuous improvement of all forms of safe transportation Reduction of traffic congestion by increasing transit ridership or alternate modes of transportation Conservation of energy though the use of SMART transportation modes that protect our environment and are sustainable in the future Enhancement of our community, so that they are safe and a desirable place to live, work, and visit Inclusion of all residents young and old, able and disable, tenants, homeowners and business Good governance through the TACK Terms of Reference Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 4 of 128 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 5 of 128 Table of Contents Authors: ................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements: .............................................................................................. 2 Disclaimer: ............................................................................................................ 2 For more information contact: ............................................................................... 2 About Transportation Action Committee Kanata (TACK) North ............................ 4 Table of Contents .................................................................................................. 6 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 10 2. Survey approach .......................................................................................... 12 3. Survey results ............................................................................................... 15 4. Discussions .................................................................................................. 54 5. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................. 55 6. References ................................................................................................... 61 7. Appendices................................................................................................... 62 Appendix A ......................................................................................................... 62 Appendix B ......................................................................................................... 74 Active Transportation Survey, Final Report, May 2015 Page 6 of 128 Table of Figures Figure 1, Kanata North, Ward 4 .......................................................................... 11 Figure 2, Survey planning [1] .............................................................................. 12 Figure 3, Methods of transportation, percentage and number ............................ 15 Figure 4, Method of transportation, normalized percentage ................................ 16 Figure 5, Car or light truck (one person), percentage and number ..................... 17 Figure 6, Car or light truck (two or more persons), percentage and number ....... 18 Figure 7, Public transit, percentage and number ................................................ 18 Figure 8, Bicycle, percentage and number ......................................................... 19 Figure 9, Walking, percentage and number ........................................................ 19 Figure 10, Jogging, percentage and number ...................................................... 20 Figure 11, skateboarding, percentage and number ............................................ 20 Figure 12, in-line skating, percentage and number ............................................. 21 Figure 13, Para-Transpo, percentage and number ............................................. 21 Figure 14, taxi, percentage and number ............................................................. 22 Figure 15, private bus or shuttle, percentage and number .................................. 22 Figure 16, others, percentage and number ......................................................... 23 Figure 17, transportation category, table ............................................................ 24 Figure 18, transportation category, responses .................................................... 24 Figure 19, transportation relative to public transit, percentage ........................... 25 Figure 20, reason for travelling, percentage and number ................................... 26 Figure 21, main suggestions for improvement, percentage and number ............ 27 Figure 22, would you cycle more often, percentage and number ....................... 28 Figure 23, number of purposed increased trips .................................................. 28 Figure 24, decreased car trips, percentage and number .................................... 29 Figure 25, number of purposed decreased trips ................................................. 30 Figure 26, reasons as a pedestrian, percentage and number ............................. 31 Figure 27, main concerns, percentage and number............................................ 32 Figure 28, would you increase walking, jogging, percentage and number .......... 34 Figure 29, ............................................................................................................ 34 Figure 30, decrease number of trips, percentage and number ........................... 35 Figure 31, would decrease number of trips ......................................................... 35 Figure 32, why use public transit, percentage and number ................................. 36 Figure 33, what are your main concerns, percentages and number ................... 37 Figure 34, would you increase public transits, percentage and number ............. 38 Figure 35, decrease car trips, percentage and number ..................................... 39 Figure 36, active transportation contributes to my quality of life, percentage and number ................................................................................................................ 40 Figure 37, dedicated lanes for buses and HOV .................................................. 41 Figure 38, satisfaction with OC Transpo, percentage and number ..................... 42 Figure 39, dedicated lanes, percentage and number .......................................... 43 Figure 40, current status, percentage and number
Recommended publications
  • GLEBE REPORT DEADLINES for 1993 and Pianist MONTH DEADLINE DATE PAPER out Members January January 4 January 15 by DAVID ROSE New Members
    *lot , To. glebe re 15, 1993 artNo. 1 January P. 22 Joint community effort beautifies Glebe BY ALLISON DINGLE of the trees to the School Among several recent init- site is another tale), a iatives to improve the en- group of neighbours and vironment and enhance the school parents undertook beauty of our neighbour- the daunting task of digging hood, the revitalization holes in very hard-packed, of Patterson Creek Park has sloping ground and manipu- taken place in several stag- lating large and heavy root- es. The project was needed bAls in order to plant four because of the lack of new silver maples along the mature, healthy trees in front of the School's the Park. gymnasium. The project first got un- It is hoped that by the derway in September 1990 time we lose the beautiful when residents of Linden mature trees, these new trees Terrace collected money and will be effective replace- carried out an ambitious ments. replanting programme, with While one group laboured planning help from the Nat- on the silver maples, ano- equally ional Capital Commission, Bill Robertson, Jim Dingle, Lorne Smith at Patterson ther enthusiastic the Park's owner. Linden, Creek planting at First Avenue SchooZ., June 22,1992. group, led by Deirdre maple, ash, pine and spruce Nicholds, were busy planting were chosen for the plan. The following spring, the new cedars, and regrouping of Greg Esnard, a Glebe An enthusiastic work party residents took up another poorer existing ones, to resident then employed at of over 20 neighbours, collection and added more enhance the east end of the Pretoria Branch of Can- from grandparents to teens, trees, including cedars, a the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping You Informed
    Newsletter Date Councillor’s Newsletter July 21 , 2017 KEEPING YOU INFORMED Councillor’s View INSIDE THIS ISSUE Kanata West Pump Station Update 2 Dear Residents, Sidewalk Construction on Hazeldean 2 Fernbank Culvert Installation 3 Last Tuesday night, I met with some Stittsville By-law Q2 Report 4 business owners for an excellent discussion at the Stittsville Committee of Adjustment Application 5 information session regarding the potential Public Health Exprt Panel Report 6 Stittsville Business Improvement Area (BIA). La Machine Comes to Ottawa 7 Splash Pads, Beaches and Pools 14 Colonel By Day Schedule Changes 18 A BIA is important for the growing business …and more! community in Stittsville to have access to the resources which help them to thrive. English French The session was well attended and some valuable points were brought up by some of the Please note that the survey will close on August 4 attendees. I strongly support the establishment of a BIA in I would like to thank the steering committee and Stittsville as I see there are many benefits that it all potential members who joined to share their would provide and it would be a valuable insight, particularly Jim Walker for taking the lead investment for businesses. All decisions of the BIA as Chair person. would be made by the businesses and it is the businesses that would elect a Board made up of I have attached a copy of the presentation made Stittsville businesses. at the meeting for your information available by clicking here. Another meeting is being planned and will hopefully take place later this autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • 1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Strategy Report
    1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Strategy Report January 17, 2020 Prepared for: Selection Groupe International Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1357 Baseline Road Transportation Impact Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 TRIP GENERATION TRIGGER ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 LOCATION TRIGGERS ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 SAFETY TRIGGERS ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 SCOPING ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 EXISTING AND PLANNED CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Proposed Development .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
    Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre SOCIO-ECONOMIC EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 300 – 300 Town Centre Boulevard 905 477 8400 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3R 5Z6 905 477 1456 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60191228 Date: October, 2011 Socio-Economic Existing Conditions Report West Carleton Environmental Centre Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Documentation ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Socio-Economic Study Team ............................................................................... 2 2. Landfill Footprint Study Areas .......................................................................... 3 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Local Residential and Recreational Resources .................................................... 4 3.1.1 Available Secondary Source Information Collection and Review .............. 4 3.1.2 Process Undertaken ................................................................................. 5 3.2 Visual ................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Approach .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Budget Title Here
    Transportation Master Plan Ottawa Cycling Plan Ottawa Pedestrian Plan 2013 Review October Consultation Summary Presentation to: Transportation Committee 15 November 2013 Presentation Overview • Summarize feedback from October 2013 consultation process • Identify proposed changes in response to comments • Present additional transit-related details for extending LRT to the suburban town centres outside the Greenbelt 2 Ottawa Pedestrian Plan October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Comments relating to maintenance, operation and design of pedestrian infrastructure • Specific feedback about intersection design, vehicle speeds, and winter maintenance • Changes to Varley Drive and Halton Terrance in the Kanata North 3 Recommended Changes Affordable Pedestrian Projects 4 Ottawa Cycling Plan October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Accessibility concerns • Paved shoulders policies • Visibility of future cycling infrastructure as part of integrated projects • Rideau Canal Footbridge (Fifth Avenue and Clegg Street) • Changes in Barrhaven, Vanier, Sandy Hill, Lowertown, Old Montreal Road, Prince of Wales Drive 5 Recommended Changes Affordable Cycling Projects 6 TMP - Transit October 2013 Consultation Feedback Major Themes: • Greater emphasis on accessibility and Para Transpo • O-Train extension to the Ottawa International Airport • Rapid Transit through the Fernbank Community • More LRT expansion (i.e. Canada Tire Centre, Trim Road, Barrhaven) • Kanata North Bus Rapid Transit extension • West Transitway (Terry Fox Station to March
    [Show full text]
  • Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road) – Recommendations
    1 Report to Rapport au: Transportation Committee Comité des transports 2 May 2018 / 2 mai 2018 and Council et au Conseil 9 May 2018 / 9 mai 2018 Submitted on April 17, 2018 Soumis le 17 avril 2018 Submitted by Soumis par: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports Contact Person Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Director / Directeur, Transportation Planning / Planification des transports, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports (613) 580-2424, 21877, [email protected] Ward: KANATA NORTH (4) / KANATA File Number: ACS2018-TSD-PLN-0002 NORD (4) / STITTSVILLE (6) / BAY (7) / BAIE (7) / COLLEGE (8) / COLLÈGE (8) / KANATA SOUTH (23) / KANATA-SUD (23) SUBJECT: Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road) – Recommendations OBJET: Étude de planification et d’évaluation environnementale du Train léger sur rail proposé vers Kanata (de la promenade Moodie au chemin Hazeldean) – Recommandations 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That Transportation Committee recommend that Council: 1. Approve the functional design for the Kanata Light Rail Transit (Moodie Drive to Hazeldean Road), as described in this report and supporting documents one and two; and, 2. Direct Transportation Planning staff to initiate the Transit Project Assessment Process in accordance with the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (Regulation 231/08), including the preparation and filing of the Environmental Project Report for final public review and comment. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil : 1. d’approuver la conception fonctionnelle du Train léger sur rail vers Kanata (de la promenade Moodie au chemin Hazeldean), comme présentée dans le présent rapport et dans les documents un à deux; et, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project
    Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT OCTOBER TO DECEMBE R , 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents I. Project description .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Project requirements ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Project timeline ................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Project impacts ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Public consultation process............................................................................................................ 5 A. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 5 a. Consultation objectives ............................................................................................................ 5 b. Dates and times ............................................................................................................................ 5 B. Consultation procedure and tools ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Submissions, Subdivison Zoning 7000 Campeau
    Summary of Written and Oral Submissions Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment – 7000 Campeau Drive (ACS2020-PIE-PS-0109) Note: This is a draft Summary of the Written and Oral Submissions received in respect of Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment – 7000 Campeau Drive (ACS2020- PIE-PS-0109), prior to City Council’s consideration of the matter on December 9, 2020. The final Summary will be presented to Council for approval at its meeting of January 27, 2021, in the report titled ‘Summary of Oral and Written Public Submissions for Items Subject to the Planning Act ‘Explanation Requirements’ at the City Council Meeting of December 9, 2020’. Please refer to the ‘Bulk Consent’ section of the Council Agenda of January 27, 2021 to access this item. In addition to those outlined in the Consultation Details section of the report, the following outlines the written and oral submissions received between the publication of the report and prior to City Council’s consideration: Number of delegations/submissions Number of delegations at Committee: 16 Number of written submissions received by Planning Committee between November 16 (the date the report was published to the City’s website with the agenda for this meeting) and November 26, 2020 (committee meeting date): 13 Primary concerns (concerns about the application / i.e. in support of the staff recommendations), by individual The following 10 persons spoke as individuals and as representatives of the Kanata Greenspace Protection Coalition (KGPC): Des Adam; Chris Teron; James Brockbank; Cyril Leeder; Terry Matthews; Denis A. Bourque; Dr. Heather McNairn; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report To/Rapport Au
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transit Commission Commission du transport en commun July 3, 2013 3 juillet 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par: Steve Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager, City Operations Directeur municipale adjointe, Opérations municipales Contact Person/Personne ressource: John Manconi, General Manager, Transit Services Directeur général, Services du transport en commun 613-842-3636 x2111, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2013-COS-TRA-0015 SUBJECT: EQUITY AND INCLUSION LENS REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 2011 ROUTE CHANGES OBJET : EXAMEN DANS L’OPTIQUE D’ÉQUITÉ ET D’INCLUSION DES MODIFICATIONS AUX CIRCUITS DE SEPTEMBRE 2011 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transit Commission approve: 1. The recommended application of the Equity and Inclusion Lens to Transit Services, as outlined in this report; and, 2. The amendments to the Evaluation of Possible Route Changes and Consultation on Proposed Route Changes service standards policies, as detailed in Document 5 and outlined in this report. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que la Commission du transport en commun approuve : 1. la mise en œuvre recommandée de l’Optique d’équité et d’inclusion dans les services de transport en commun, comme il est exposé dans le présent rapport; 2. les modifications aux politiques sur les normes de service intitulées Évaluation des modifications possibles aux circuits et Consultation 2 concernant les modifications aux circuits proposées, comme il est expliqué en détail dans le document 5 et exposé dans le présent rapport. BACKGROUND On April 20, 2011, the Transit Commission approved changes to a number of bus routes across the system. As part of that decision, the Commission also adopted the following motion: That OC Transpo staff report back to the Commission prior to the implementation of route changes in September on what impact studies will be undertaken on the impact of the changes to bus routes that would address the concerns of various groups within the City and deal with the following issues: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports and Council / et au Conseil November 7, 2013 7 novembre 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0230 SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN, OTTAWA PEDESTRIAN PLAN AND OTTAWA CYCLING PLAN UPDATE – ADDENDUM REPORT OBJET : PLAN DIRECTEUR DES TRANSPORTS, PLAN DE LA CIRCULATION PIÉTONNIÈRE D’OTTAWA ET PLAN SUR LE CYCLISME D’OTTAWA – ADDENDA REPORT RECOMMENDATION That Transportation Committee recommend Council approve the recommended changes identified in this report (Table 1) to the draft Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Pedestrian Plan and Ottawa Cycling Plan that was tabled on October 9, 2013 at the Joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission meeting. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil d’approuver les modifications recommandées et précisées dans le présent rapport (tableau 1) pour la version provisoire du Plan directeur des transports, le Plan de la circulation piétonnière d’Ottawa et le Plan sur le cyclisme d’Ottawa qui ont été déposé le 9 octobre 2013 lors de la réunion conjointe du Comité des transports et de la Commission du transport en commun. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Assumptions and Analysis This is an addendum to the October 9, 2013 joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission staff report (ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0193) to summarize the consultation feedback and proposed changes following the tabling and public release of the draft 2013 Transportation Master Plan (TMP), Ottawa Pedestrian Plan (OPP) and Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP).
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Kanata North Message from Councillor Wilkinson
    WELCOME TO KANATA NORTH MESSAGE FROM COUNCILLOR WILKINSON anata North is the most fantastic ward in the City of Ottawa. As well as the Kanata North Business K Park, the largest employment area outside the City core, it contains natural environment lands, a provincially significant wetland, distinctive residential areas, the town centre that serves both Kanata North and Kanata South, schools, churches and retail areas. Just across Highway 417 is Canadian Tire Place, the home of the Ottawa Senators, and under construction is an outlet mall and Bass Pro Shop. I’ve had the great opportunity of representing this area on municipal councils for 25 years, with 9 of those years as Head of Council and 7 of those years as Mayor of Kanata, when Kanata was a separate municipality. My job is to serve all aspects of the community, from individual con- cerns to dealing with large developments and the services they need. Welcome to Kanata North. Feel free to contact me via phone 613-580-2474 or email Marianne.Wilkinson@ ottawa.ca if you have any concerns or suggestions to make Kanata North an even better place. MESSAGE FROM KANATA NORTH BIA anata North is a fantastic place to live, work and play. We have over 500 businesses doing incredible work K – and yet we have access to green space and many, many trails, right outside our door. Truthfully, we think there is no better place! The Kanata North BIA works hard every day to support our local businesses, and to promote the area as a center of expertise in technology and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • General Meeting of 17 May 2017 Kanata Baptist Church, 485 Hazeldean Road, Ottawa M I N U T E S
    General Meeting of 17 May 2017 Kanata Baptist Church, 485 Hazeldean Road, Ottawa M I N U T E S Participants: Sheila Perry [Chair, Overbrook CA], Chris Barker [Rockcliffe Park Residents Association], Robert Brinker [Carlington CA], Bob Brocklebank {Glebe CA], Archie Campbell [Dalhousie CA], Bonnie Charron [Riverside Park CA], David Clark [City View CA], Denys Cooper [Dows Lake Residents Association], Alex Cullen [Belltown Neighbours Association], Lorne Cutler [Hampton Iona Community Group], Roland Dorsay [Champlain Park CA], Erwin Dreessen [ Greenspace Alliance], Thierry Harris [Lowertown CA], Paul Goodkey [Old Ottawa East CA], Miranda Gray [Convent Glen/Orleans Wood CA], Dave Grosvenor [Woodroffe North CA], Kul Kapoor [Katimavik Hazeldean CA], Rod MacLean [Katimavik Hazeldean CA], Maria Luisa Marti [Centretown Citizens CA], Sylvia Milne [Glebe Annex CA], Cora Murphy [Woodroffe North CA], Cindy Parkanyi [New Edinburgh Community Alliance], Bob Parkins [Old Ottawa East CA], Chad Rollins [Action Sandy Hill], Gillian Salmond [Wellington Village CA], Bonnie Schroeder [Council on Aging of Ottawa], Anne Stairs [Riverview Park CA], John Stevenson [Citizens for Safe Cycling], Don Stewart [Westboro Beach CA], Phil Sweetnam [Stittsville Village Association], Neil Thomson [Kanata Beaverbrook CA] Guests: Allan Hubley [Councillor, Ward 23-Kanata South], Shad Qadri [Councillor, Ward 6- Stittsville], Marianne Wilkinson [Councillor, Ward 4-Kanata North], Stephen Willis [General Manager, Planning Infrastructure & Economic Development, City of Ottawa] Charmaine Forgie [Manager, Business Support Services, City of Ottawa] 1. Call to Order & Welcome by A/President Sheila Perry (7:15 pm) 2. Adoption of Agenda: m/s Chad Rollins/Don Stewart – CARRIED 3. (a) Introduction to Katimavik by Rod MacLean: Katimavik is a Bill Teron-designed residential community in Kanata, built in 1971 and growing from the original Hazeldean Village (established in 1818).
    [Show full text]