DOCSLIB.ORG

Optical Fibre Submarine Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optical Fibre Submarine Systems Optical fibre submarine GREENLAND systems D N ALASKA A (USA) ICELAND L Umeå N Vestmannaeyjar BOTNIA I Vaasa F Faroes SWEDEN Rauma RUSSIA 6 x 622 Turku Hallstavik Whittier Valdez Karst 2 + 1 x 2.5 Gbit/s Norrtälje Kingisepp Seward Tallin NORWAY ESTONIA U N Lena I 2 x 560 LATVIA CANTAT-3 T point AC-1 E DENMARK CANADA D Westerland LITHUANIA Northstar 2 x 4 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s TAT-14 K I N REP. OF IRELAND G BELORUSSIA TAT-10 2 + 1 x 560 D S D Norden/ N O LA Grossheide ER POLAND M TH NE GERMANY Gemini North 2 x 6 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s BELGIUM CZECH Dieppe REP. Port UKRAINE Alberni NPC 3 + 1 x 420 St Brieuc SLOVAK REP. M O KAZAKHSTAN L FRANCE D Seattle AC-1 AUSTRIA A V TPC-5 2 x 5 Gbit/s HUNGARY I Tillamook PTAT-1 3 + 1 x 420 Gbit/s SWITZ. I A A Odessa DM) x 2.5 St Hilaire de Riez SLOVEN 2 x 6 (W MONGOLIA i South FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s emin CROATIA ROMANIA Pacific G Y I U Novorossijsk City Pennant Point HERZEGOVINABOSNIA- G s T O 2.5 SochiGbit/s PC-1 Medway Harbour Gbit/ S x 5 L TAT-11 3 DxM 560) A Varna Shirley x 3 (W A V Nakhodka TAT-12 2 x 3 (WDM) x 5 Gbit/s 2 I GEORGIA Ishikati TAT-13 A BULGARIA UZBEKISTAN Rhode Island F L PC-1 L ALBANIA Poti A KYRGYZSTAN N Long Island G Y TAT-9 2 + 1 x 560 ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN New York MACEDONIA TURKMENISTAN NORTH Bandon TAT-8 2 x 280 Istanbul KOREA FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s Azores SPAIN E R-J-K C 2 x 560 0 EE 6 R 5 G Dalian A CANUS-1 TAT-14 PORTUGAL TURKEY JIH CableProject Japan-US Manasquan Lisbon UNITED STATES 3x TAJIKISTAN Point Sesimbra PC-1 Arena Tuckerton Marmaris Yantaï SOUTH P TPC-4 2 x 560 A S Naoetsu Bizerte E Taean KOREA PTAT-1 Algiers S A Qingdao E - PC-1 PC-1 Atlantica-1 A M A FRIC - E- SYRIA 2 x 560 Pusan Tokyo San Tetouan M W FLAG Luis E- E 3 CHINA J O W Kohung Obispo EURA E 2 AFGHANISTAN C Casablanca IRAN Cheju Sasebo LEBANON TUNISIA IRAQ C Chongming Miyazaki Bermuda Port ISRAEL MAC Said Tijuana Alexandria Shanghai China-US 4 x 8 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s Atlantica-1 KUWAIT 1 x 280 TPC-3 Japan-US Kuwait JORDAN APC 3 x 560 SAT-3 / WASC Suez FOG 2 x 4 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s Columbus-3 1 x 2 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s NEPAL /s MOROALGERIA CARAC 1 x 420 BHUTAN LIBYA Okinawa Japan-US 2 x 16 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s Southern Cross West Palm Beach Canary Bahrain Fujairah PAKISTAN 2x5 Gbit Hollywood 2 x 4 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s Islands 2 x 140 Jask H-J-K Americas-1 2 MACx 520 EGYPT QATAR Karachi Taipei MEXICO / s A Gbit R 2.5 C HAW-5 2 x 560 x O BANGLADESH 6 S Ruwais AG TPC-5 PAC 1 1 SAUDI TPC-5 S 6 FL HAW-4 3 x 280 O x 2. U. A. E. Shenzhen C 5 Gb 3 x 560 ARABIA Mazatian R CUBA it/s Muscat INDIA Shantou A WESTERN Jeddah TPC-3 3 x 280 2 SAHARA Hong Kong NORTHERN - s Zhuhai 1 x 420 MARIANAS Cancún Columbus-2 i MAYA 1 2 x 3 (WDM) t n Mumbai BURMA 2.5 Gbit/s CJFS a l Santo t LAOS 3 x 280 x 2.5 Gbit/s 2.5 Gbit/s A Domingo TPC-3 MAURITANIA it/s Southern Cross 20 Gbit/s (WDM) Cayman HAITI San Tortola OMAN Gb Juan .5 GPT 3 x 280 China-US 4 x 8 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s Kingston St. Thomas MALI 2 BELIZE 0 x A HAWAIIAN 1 x 140 6 L A NIGER 5 Pyapon A 1 x 622 ISLANDS t ECFS x l Manila M ARCOS 1 Dakar E a SENEGAL ERITREA 2 x 5 Gbit/s 3 x 280 T n 2 6 x 2.5 Gbit/s 2.5 x 6 TCS-1 6 x 2.5 Gbit/s A Puerto t YEMEN TPC-5 2 x 5 Gbit/s GU i CHAD THAILAND Batangas Guam CortesHONDURAS 1 ARCOS c 1 x 140PAC a- SUDAN 1 2 GAMBIA P FLAG M EL Atlantica-1 - Gbit/s Bangkok H T SALVADOR SAC 2 x 10 Aden A Da A T PAC Venezuela BURKINA N Nang E I S NICARAGUA L L SEA-ME-WE 3 2 x 8 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s CAMBODIA T I GUINEA- C Domestic E I BISSAU I P 1 + 1 x 2.5 Gbit/s Djibouti V SEA-ME-WE 3 H P Puerto I L GUINEA Sihanoukville P 6 PLDT 140 COSTALimon Caracas x SEA-ME-WE 2 I RICA Cochin s 2 Barranquilla Trinidad / N Camuri NIGERIA . PAC Carúpano Vung it 5 Cabimas BENIN b G Colon SAC 2 x 10 Gbit/s Tau b Butuan E P A Panama SIERRA G it M /s A N A Atlantica-1 A LEONE it/s 5 S m IVORY ETHIOPIA Gb x TOGO SRI VENEZUELA er .5 2 ic COAST LANKA x 2 a LIBERIA CENTRAL ) N s- Colombo DM C GUYANA 1 AFRICAN REPUBLIC (W P 2 GHANA x 8 A 3 2 PACRIM EAST 2 x 560 GUINEA x E s A 5 ME-W it/ m 2 SEA- Gb FR. e 0 CAMEROON x 5 Brunei ri 2 Medan Penang ca LAG Buenaventura s F SURINAM Atlantica-1-2 Mersing 8 COLOMBIA x EQUAT. 2 GUINEA SOMALIA .5 SARAWAK G b Singapore PACRIM WEST 2 x 560 it /s KENYA GABON PACKET 1 CONGO UGANDA Biak ECUADOR DEMOCRATIC 2 x 560 BORNEO Sorong Saliras SAT-3 / WASC BRAZZAVILLE RWA NDA Jayapura REPUBLIC OF Banjarmasin Ambon P A CONGO BURUNDI N Fortaleza A M Ujung SAC 2 x 10 Gbit/s 1 x 280 PERU Jakarta Pandang PAPUA 2 TANZANIA PACKET 2 NEW x Natal Surabaya 2 GUINEA . 5 Bali SAT-2 2 x 560 MALAYSIA G BRAZIL b i SOLOMON ) t / M s 5 ISLANDS 6 D 5 W Porto Segura x ( 1 ANGOLA s / Lurin + MALAWI t i 4 E b JASURAUS 1 x 5 Gbit/s c Southern Cross 20 Gbit/s (WDM) G i U Sao Mateus t 0 s ZAMBIA e Q 2 I m s o B s o D SAFE r BOLIVIA l M i C z A S a n r Z E r B A e O - SAC 2 x 10 Gbit/s h Arica M s ZIMBABWE M t / FIJI u t E VANUATU i o - b S G Harare W 5 E . 3 2 NAMIBIA Reunion Port Hedland PARAGUAY x Mauritius ) 2 M x D BOTSWANA 8( W NEW Rio de Janeiro ( W CALEDONIA 4 D MADAGASCAR M E Santos x 2 ) x 2 AUSTRALIA 2 . s- 5 ti SWAZILAND G n b a i l t t / s L A A Florianopolis Durban SAC 2 x 10 Gbit/s SOUTH LESOTHO N AFRICA I I Perth URUGUAY Melkbosstrand Valparaiso SAC 2 x 10 Gbit/s Maldonado UNISUR 2 x 560 Cape Town H Montevideo SAFE Sydney T TASMAN-2 3 x 560 Las Toninas Auckland N TASMAN-3 Systems supplied by Alcatel C D 6 x 622 E N Systems supplied jointly by A Alcatel and others L G Other manufacturers’ systems R Circle denotes an underwater NEW ZEA branching unit A Broken line indicates system FALKLAND under construction ISLANDS Shantou Fangshan RIOJA HONTAI-2 Planned systems Hong Kong Karst 1 x 420 s Beihai Macau / China-US 8 x 2.5 Gbit/s t i TAT-11 H-J-K 1 x 280 b Arendal Odessa G St. Hilaire de Riez 3 x 280 AC-1 5 . Lysekil 2 Kristiansand ODIN Unless otherwise stated, capacities show TAT-10 TAT-9 2 + 1 x 560 Lingao 2 x x 2 x 2.5 Gbit/s TAT-14 565 number of fibre pairs and bit rate in Mbit/s 1 + Vastervik 2 Hjørring 2 x 140 Rijeka Da 3 Genoa Constanta - Visby Savona Pyapon Nang 3 T Thisted 22 E 2 x 5 Gbit/s 3 + 1 x 420 A Monaco 6 ) 3 x 280 W T Marseille - x M © Alcatel Submarine Networks 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.3/4 N G CC4 Split D E A 0 56 A Rodiles Varna 2 W M C L Santander ( - ODIN x CC5 s 2 F bit/ A Batangas sia Dubrovnik S BS- 2.5 G E 6 x us 1 x 280 O 5 FOCS 2 x S R TAGIDE-2 F k- 1 x 560 56 Bangkok 140 ar A x Chon Buri Dundonald m K 0 T en 1 x 560 A 3 Blaabjerg Trelleborg 6 E D r Ajaccio R Phet Buri Bang 0 i U 5 L a T 6 I Hua Hin I Glasgow n Copenhagen Barcelona 2 x 2.5 Gbit/s Pomezia Lamung x s 5 C e / 0 Maade Igneada 2 it x P 8 H Portpatrick x 2 Rønne 2 2 Istanbul Prachuap 1 x 560 b 2 4 3 x 280 Bari Durrës I A 2 G RK L A 2 x 140 Golfo Sihanoukville M D 5 6 PLDT 140 EN Westerland 6 x 140 x 3 x 280 x 3 Minorca -D Aranci 3 x 280 R Champhon H x P APC 3 x 560 x Belfast K 5 - - Douglas Millom U I A 2 PENBAL-3 V 2 6 Vung Cochin Ranong 6 x 565 - M .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regulatory, Infrastructure and Tariff Aspects of Electronic
    MM www.idate.org The European way to think the Digital World Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the Outermost Regions (OR) A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Prepared for the European Commission DG Regional Policy December 2005 This study was financed by the European Community and was performed by IDATE and LL&A in partnership with INESC PORTO (Portugal) and MM (Spain). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors only and under no circumstances are to be construed as those of the European Commission. IDATE – BP4167 – 34092 Montpellier cedex 5 – Tel : +33(0)467 144 444 – Fax : +33(0)467 144 400 – [email protected] Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the ORs: A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Final report Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. State of the art of telecommunications in the ORs....................................................................... 9 1.1. Networks and services............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Regulation and competition ................................................................................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1St Generation (Regenerator System Using 1.31 Micron Wavelength)
    SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1st Generation (Regenerator System using 1.31 micron wavelength) System Landing Countries Capacity Route Length Delivery Japan, U.S.A. (Guam, TPC-3 (Note 1) 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 3,760km Dec. 88 Hawaii) Hong Kong, Japan, Hong Kong-Japan-Korea 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 4,700km Apr. 90 Korea Kuantan-Kota Kinabaru Malaysia 840Mbps (420Mbps x 2fp) 1,570km Dec. 90 Japan, U.S.A. North Pacific Cable (NPC) 1680Mbps (420Mbps x 4fp) 9,400km Apr. 91 (Mainland) Surabaya-Banjarmasin Indonesia 280Mbps (280Mbps x 1fp) 410km Dec. 91 N. ote 1:The very first Branching Units deployed in the Pacific 1 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 2 ) 2nd Generation (Regenerator System using 1.55 micron wavelength) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery UK-Germany No.5 (Note 2) UK, Germany 3.6Gbps (1.8Gbps x 2fp) 500km Oct. 91 Brunei-Singapore Brunei, Singapore 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Nov. 91 Brunei, Malaysia, Brunei-Malaysia-Philippines (BMP) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Jan. 92 Philippines Japan, U.S.A. TPC-4 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 5000km Oct. 92 (Mainland) Japan, Hong Kong, APC Taiwan, Malaysia, 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 7600km Aug. 93 Singapore Malaysia-Thailand Malaysia, Thailand 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Aug. 94 (incl. Petchaburi-Sri Racha) Russia-Japan-Korea (RJK) Russia, Japan, Korea 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1700km Nov. 94 Thailand, Vietnam, Thailand-Vietnam-Hong Kong (T-V-H) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 3400km Nov. 95 Hong Kong N. ote 2: The very first giga bit submarine cable system in the world 2 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 3 ) 3rd Generation (Optical Amplifier System) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery Malaysia Domestic (Southern Link) Malaysia 10Gbps (5Gbps x 2fp) 2,300km Jul.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammar for Academic Writing
    GRAMMAR FOR ACADEMIC WRITING Tony Lynch and Kenneth Anderson (revised & updated by Anthony Elloway) © 2013 English Language Teaching Centre University of Edinburgh GRAMMAR FOR ACADEMIC WRITING Contents Unit 1 PACKAGING INFORMATION 1 Punctuation 1 Grammatical construction of the sentence 2 Types of clause 3 Grammar: rules and resources 4 Ways of packaging information in sentences 5 Linking markers 6 Relative clauses 8 Paragraphing 9 Extended Writing Task (Task 1.13 or 1.14) 11 Study Notes on Unit 12 Unit 2 INFORMATION SEQUENCE: Describing 16 Ordering the information 16 Describing a system 20 Describing procedures 21 A general procedure 22 Describing causal relationships 22 Extended Writing Task (Task 2.7 or 2.8 or 2.9 or 2.11) 24 Study Notes on Unit 25 Unit 3 INDIRECTNESS: Making requests 27 Written requests 28 Would 30 The language of requests 33 Expressing a problem 34 Extended Writing Task (Task 3.11 or 3.12) 35 Study Notes on Unit 36 Unit 4 THE FUTURE: Predicting and proposing 40 Verb forms 40 Will and Going to in speech and writing 43 Verbs of intention 44 Non-verb forms 45 Extended Writing Task (Task 4.10 or 4.11) 46 Study Notes on Unit 47 ii GRAMMAR FOR ACADEMIC WRITING Unit 5 THE PAST: Reporting 49 Past versus Present 50 Past versus Present Perfect 51 Past versus Past Perfect 54 Reported speech 56 Extended Writing Task (Task 5.11 or 5.12) 59 Study Notes on Unit 60 Unit 6 BEING CONCISE: Using nouns and adverbs 64 Packaging ideas: clauses and noun phrases 65 Compressing noun phrases 68 ‘Summarising’ nouns 71 Extended Writing Task (Task 6.13) 73 Study Notes on Unit 74 Unit 7 SPECULATING: Conditionals and modals 77 Drawing conclusions 77 Modal verbs 78 Would 79 Alternative conditionals 80 Speculating about the past 81 Would have 83 Making recommendations 84 Extended Writing Task (Task 7.13) 86 Study Notes on Unit 87 iii GRAMMAR FOR ACADEMIC WRITING Introduction Grammar for Academic Writing provides a selective overview of the key areas of English grammar that you need to master, in order to express yourself correctly and appropriately in academic writing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic François Vreÿ
    Contexto Internacional vol. 39(2) May/Aug 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2017390200008 A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic François Vreÿ François Vreÿ* Abstract: Analysts frequently label the BRICS grouping of states (Brazil, India, Russia, China, and South Africa) as primarily an economic club emphasising economic performances as primary ob- jectives. Co-operation of international groupings are rarely, if ever, set within the context of their access to maritime interests, security, and benefits. A second void stems from the lack of emphasis upon the economic benefits of secured maritime domains. In this vein, a common, but neglected aspect of the BRICS grouping’s power and future influence resides in their maritime domains, the value of which ultimately depends upon the responsible governance and use of ocean territories. The maritime interests of BRICS countries only become meaningful if reinforced by maritime se- curity governance and co-operation in the respective oceans. Presently China and India seem to dominate the maritime stage of BRICS, but the South Atlantic is an often overlooked space. For BRICS the value of the South Atlantic stems from how it secures and unlocks the potential of this maritime space through co-operative ventures between Brazil, South Africa as a late BRICS partner, and West African littoral states in particular. Unfortunately, BRICS holds its own maritime tensions, as member countries also pursue competing interests at sea. Keywords: Africa; Brazil; BRICS; Maritime Security; South Atlantic; South Africa. Introduction Contemporary maritime thought prioritises matters that underpin the use of the oceans in more constructive ways, underlines the importance of co-operation, and manages the oceans in a way that promotes sustainability (Petrachenko 2012: 74).
    [Show full text]
  • KDDI Global ICT Brochure
    https://global.kddi.com KDDI-Global Networks and IT Solutions Networking, Colocation, System Integration around the world BUILDING YOUR BUSINESS TOGETHER KDDI solutions are at the cutting-edge in all fields of information and communications KDDI, a Fortune Global 500 company, is one of Asia’s largest telecommunications providers, with approximately US$48 billion in annual revenue and a proven track record extending over many years and around the world. We deliver all-round services, from mobile phones to fixed-line communications, making us your one-stop solution provider for telecommunications and IT environments. The high praise and trust enjoyed by our TELEHOUSE data centers positioned around the world have kept us at the forefront of service and quality. Since our establishment in 1953, we have expanded our presence into 28 countries and 60 cities, with over 100 offices around the world supporting the success of our international customers through our high quality services. KDDI’s mobile telephone brand “au” has achieved significant market share in Japan, one of the world’s most comprehensive KDDI Quick Facts communications markets. KDDI’s relationship with over 600 carriers worldwide enables us to provide high-quality international network services in over 190 countries. Our exciting ventures, built on extensive experience, include investment in the “South-East Asia Japan 2 Cable”, which connects 11 locations in 9 countries and territories in Asia. Moreover, as the world moves toward the age of IoT and 5G, KDDI is taking steps to promote IoT business, such as connected cars, support for companies engaged in global business, and the creation of new value for our society.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2015 by ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, S.W. Washin
    (202) 223-7323 (202) 204-7371 [email protected] March 30, 2015 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Joint Application for Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licenses from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. SCL-T/C-20141121-00013 and SCL-T/C-20141121-00014; Applications for Transfer of Control of Section 214 Authorizations from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. ITC-T/C-20141121-00304 and ITC-T/C-20141121-00307 Dear Ms. Dortch: On Thursday, March 26, 2015, the undersigned counsel and representatives of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc (“C&W”) and Columbus Networks, Limited (“CNL”) met with members of the Commission’s staff to discuss the above-cited pending applications, and in particular Digicel’s pleadings and ex parte filing in the proceeding. Doc#: US1:9949275v3 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary 2 Attending this meeting on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc were Belinda Bradbury, General Counsel, and Simeon Irvine, Chief Executive, Wholesale. C&W outside counsel Patrick Campbell and Diane Gaylor of Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also attended. Attending on behalf of Columbus Networks, Limited were Paul Scott, President and Chief Operating Officer, Columbus Networks USA, Inc., and Victor A. Lago, Vice President of Legal Affairs, Columbus Networks USA, Inc. CNL outside counsel Ulises Pin of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP also attended. Commission staff in attendance were, from the International Bureau, Nese Guendelsberger, Deputy Bureau Chief (by phone); Kathleen Collins, Assistant Bureau Chief; Walt Strack, Assistant Bureau Chief and Chief Economist; Howard Griboff, Acting Division Chief, Policy Division; David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Policy Division; Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division; Jodi Cooper, Senior Attorney, Policy Division; and, from the Office of General Counsel, James Bird.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 223 / Monday, November 18, 1996 / Notices 58689
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 223 / Monday, November 18, 1996 / Notices 58689 [DA 96±1752] procedures, the International Bureau facilities or to particular countries for was required to establish and maintain those carriers receiving a global Section Streamlining the International Section an exclusion list identifying restrictions 214 authorization, is hereby adopted. 214 Authorization Process and Tariff on providing service using particular 6. This Order is issued under 0.261 of Requirements facilities or to particular countries for the Commission's Rules and is effective AGENCY: Federal Communications those carriers receiving a global Section upon adoption. Petitions for Commission. 214 authorization. On July 6, 1996, the reconsideration under § 1.106 or Commission adopted the exclusion list. applications for review under § 1.115 of ACTION: Notice. (Exclusion List Order adopted on July the Commission's Rules may be filed SUMMARY: On October 22, 1996, the 26, 1996, 61 FR 50023 (September 24, within 30 days of the date of the public International Bureau of the Federal 1996)). notice of this Order (see 47 CFR Communications Commission adopted 2. On October 22, 1996, the State 1.4(b)(2)). an Order on Reconsideration modifying Department notified the Bureau that it Federal Communications Commission would support the removal of CANUS± the Order adopting the exclusion list in Diane J. Cornell, this proceeding (Exclusion List Order 1 from the exclusion list, provided that the conditions of the cable landing Chief, Telecommunications Division, adopted on July 26, 1996). The International Bureau. Commission modified the exclusion list license granted to OPTEL are not by removing CANUS±1 from the modified.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Second Issue
    An international forum for the expression of ideas and First Quarter 2002 opinions pertaining to the submarine telecoms industry 1 Contents List of Advertisers Editors Exordium 3 Undersea Intelligence on the Costa del Sol International Cable Protection Committee 5 EMEA Conference 30 Emails to the Editor 4 Global Marine Systems Ltd 5,6 The State of the Industry Network Maintenance 5 Europe, the Middle East, Africa and India TMS International 16 Christian Annoque 31 Sub Tech 7 Offshore Site Investigation Conference 18 Tracking the Cableships Sub Tell 8 Latest locations of the world’s cableships 36 International Subsea & Telecom Services 22 Ventures 9 Technology in Long-span Smit-Oceaneering Cable Systems 29,39,47 Submarine Systems Vessels 10 CTC Marine Projects 35 Tony Frisch 40 Searching for a light in the fog A future for the submarine cable industry? Fibre Optics in Offshore Michael Ruddy 11 Communications Jon Seip 45 Bandwidth ORGANISING A The State of the Market Letter to a friend CON ERENCE? Rex Ramsden 19 Jean Devos 52 Give your exhibition or conference Countdown to Apollo Launch maximum exposure to the submarine Australasian Communications Conference The world’s most advanced cable system telecoms industry. Advertise your event in A once-only chance to hear from influential Katherine Edwards 23 Submarine Telecoms Forum strategists and CEOs 56 The State of the Industry and reach all the key people. The Americas Diary Dates Email: [email protected]@subtelforum.com John Manock 27 Upcoming Conferences 2002 57 2 An international forum for the expression of ideas and opinions pertaining to the submarine telecom industry Exordium Submarine Telecoms Forum is published quarterly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Infrastructure Map Switz
    Greenland Iceland Sweden Russia Finland Faroe Is. Norway Estonia Latvia United Kingdom Denmark TEA Canada TEA Lanis-3 Lithuania ERA Lanis-2 Lanis-1 ERA Belarus TEA-3 Ireland Netherlands Concerto Poland Solas Germany TEA-3 Belgium Czech Rep. TEA-3 PC-1 Lux. EPEG Slovakia Ukraine PC-1 Tata TGN-Pacific GTT Atlantic Tata TGN-Pacific Tata TGN-Pacific GTT Atlantic HUGO Tata TGN-Pacific Liech. Moldova Kazakhstan Austria Trans-Pacific Express France Switz. Hungary Trans-Pacific Express FASTER Slovenia FASTER Romania Mongolia TEA Japan-U.S. Japan-U.S. Apollo Tata TGN- Croatia Western Europe PC-1 EPEG PC-1 Unity/EAC-Pacific Bos. & Herz. TEA Unity/EAC-Pacific Serbia Italy Mont. PC-1 TataTGN-Pacific FLAG Atlantic-1 Uzbekistan 2Africa Kos. Bulgaria FLAG Atlantic-1 Andorra Apollo Georgia AAE-1 Macedonia Kyrgyzstan EIG 2023 2023 IMEWE Hawk Albania Armenia Azerbaijan Portugal SeaMeWe-5 North 2Africa 2Africa SeaMeWe-3 Tata TGN-Western Europe TGN-Western Tata GLO-1 GLO-1 Europe India Gatway Gatway India Europe FLAG Europe-Asia FLAG SeaMeWe-4 Turkey Turkmenistan Greece Korea Spain MedNautilus VMSCS United States Tajikistan Japan-U.S. South EAC-C2C Korea Japan Malta MedNautilus Cyprus Syria Tunisia China Lebanon TEA TPE Afghanistan ERA SouthernHawaiki Cross WACS Iraq Iran Bermuda AAE-1 EIG Palestinian Terr. Japan-U.S. Morocco EPEG SAT-3/WASC TE North Israel Jordan TGN-Eurasia SEACOM Pakistan Alexandros Kuwait TPE Asia-America Gateway Nepal Japan-U.S. FALCON AJC Algeria TEA APCN-2 EAC-C2C Southern Cross Libya AAE-1 OMRAN/EPEG Bhutan Egypt Bahrain ASE/Cahaya Malaysia FOG Bahamas EIG Qatar FLAG/REACH NAL MENA/GBI EAC-C2C Pacific Bangladesh Mexico W.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Ocean : a New Vision
    2013 (2) ISSN 2277 – 2464 FPRC Journal ________________________________________________________ (a Quarterly research journal devoted to studies on Indian Foreign Policy) ________________________________________________________________ Focus : Indian Ocean : A New Vision Responses, Articles ________________________________________________________ Foreign Policy Research Centre NEW DELHI (INDIA) ________________________________________________________ FPRC Journal 2013(2) Indian Ocean : A New Vision Preface Indian Ocean has the unique distinction of being the only ocean named after a country. For extra‐regional powers, the Indian Ocean has for decades fulfilled the role of an important transit corridor But Sardar KM Pannikar rightly said, “While to other countries, the Indian Ocean is only one of the important oceanic areas, to India it is a vital sea. Her lifelines are concentrated in that area, her freedom is dependent on the freedom of that water surface. No industrial development, no commercial growth, no stable political structure is possible for her unless her shores are protected...” Therefore, there is a realisation across the spectrum that the challenges, opportunities and roles the Indian Ocean provides, need to be discussed seriously in the light of the fragile security environment in the region. It is very heartening to note that a wide galaxy of writers have focused on important themes and other related issues in their writings and comments, for this special issue of FPRC Journal on Indian Ocean. We express our heart-felt thanks to our contributors who have shared our sentiments and accepted our invitation to enrich the contents of the Journal.They are always our source of strength. Mahendra Gaur Indira Gaur Director Mg. Editor Foreign Policy Research Centre New Delhi 1 FPRC Journal 2013(2) Indian Ocean : A New Vision FPRC Journal Focus : Indian Ocean : A New Vision Contributors : RESPONSES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Joufsofu!Lpsfb
    Attachment 5 XIJUF!QBQFS! JOUFSOFU!LPSFB As the leading agency for national informatization, the National Computerization Agency provides policies and state of the art technology that will guide us to the successful construction of e-Korea. For more than ten the people of National Computerization Agency(NCA) have kept helping the public and private sector to make the best of new and exciting opportunities brought by information and communication technology all over the country. N ational Computerization Age n cy Ministry of Inform ation and Communication XIJUF!QBQFS! JOUFSOFU!LPSFB As the leading agency for national informatization, the National Computerization Agency provides policies and state of the art technology that will guide us to the successful construction of e-Korea. For more than ten the people of National Computerization Agency(NCA) have kept helping the public and private sector to make the best of new and exciting opportunities brought by information and communication technology all over the country. Message From the Minister Korea has established a world-class information and communication infrastructure thanks to the joint efforts of the government and private sectors to build an IT powerhouse during the 1990s. Korea's leading infrastructure in the information and communication sector has enabled Korea to achieve unprecedented developments in all areas including political, economic, social and cultural spheres. As of the end of 2003, 11.18 million households - more than 73% of the total number of households - subscribed to broadband Internet and 29.22 million people - 66% of the total population - had access to the Internet. According to the "ITU 2003 Internet Report," Korea ranks first in terms of broadband Internet penetration rate, has the third largest population of Internet users, and has the fourth highest PC penetration rate in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastlines Are Reproduced Using GEBCO Digital Atlas, Centenary Edition 2003
    Subsea Cables UK is an industry organisation with the aim of promoting marine safety, safeguarding submarine cables and encouraging excellent practice within the industry. Subsea Cables UK does not broadly differentiate between the Communications, Power and Renewable industry cables as their impact on other seabed stakeholders is so similar. Subsea Cables UK is interested in any cables which land or pass through UK waters including the Exclusive Economic Zone. SOUTH WEST APPROACHES Kingfisher Awareness Chart Kilmore! New Quay! 13°W 30' 12°W 30' 11°W 30' 10°W 30' IRELAN9D°! W 30' 8°W 30' 7°W 30' 6°W 30' 5°W 30' 4°W 30' 3°W C U ! E K L - T I ! I R 52°N C 52°N E Fishguard ( L O A Cork O N REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ! S D ) Saltees Ground + C ! 4 R St. David's 4 O ( 0 S ) S ¥ 8 WALES 4 I ! 5 N 7 G 5 5 2 5 9 + 9 4 Kinsale 9 4 Milford! Haven ! ( 0 ) 2 0 8 Swansea 5 ! Ballycotton Ground 1 Dursey Island ! 0 Turbot Bank 3 1 Our aim is to optimise coexistence and minimise any hazards 1 Oxwich 9 ! P NYMPHE 0 T 520 + A 7 674 30' 4 T 0)20 ! 30' 4 +44( ( IR S Cardiff 0 OLA ) I S 2 S Marine Safety 0 H 7 B Kinsale Head Grounds 6 R S 7 W 4 A BANK 5 N AN 2 C S 0 H E 0 00 The Smalls Ground A/ 452 BR 7 67 EA (0)20 N +4 +44 4(0 ) 0 g 2 207 67452 0 H Se 5200 RT 674 U + O 7 K I N )20 AL (0 G 4 - N 44 U I I + T 4 R M AT OR E T P ( E E P - S K 0 G U L ! E ) P A A O 2 N Lundy Island UR 98 T .E 2 0 6 D W 6 8 A 2 1 T 9 TA 8 C 00 + 5 54 08 R 1 06 0 4 caused by the installation or presence of submarine cables to other sea bed users.
    [Show full text]