Asia Pacific Hong Kong

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Asia Pacific Hong Kong Contact us Americas Asia Pacific SSAO* Europe Middle East Africa Herndon, VA, USA Hong Kong Singapore London, UK Dubai, United Arab Emirates Johannesburg, South Africa Tel +1 703 621 1600 Tel +852 2888 6688 Tel +65 64293988 Tel +44 (0) 207 173 1700 Tel +971 (0) 4 446 7480 Tel +27 11 797 3300 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Note: *SAARC, South Asia & Oceania Region Paris, France Tel +33 (0) 1 84 88 05 88 [email protected] 0 +30 +60 +90 +120 +150 +180 +150 +120 +90 +60 +30 Arctic Ocean Kara Sea North Greenland Sea Barents Sea Laptev Sea Arctic Ocean Greenland Norwegian Sea Beaufort Sea Chukchi Sea Iceland Sea Murmansk North Sea Greenland Sea Kostomuksha Kem Seydisordur Arkhangel'sk Iceland FARICE Belomorsk Provideniya Noyabrsk Grindavik Finland Landeyjasandur Syktyvkar DANICE Funningsordur Nuuk Yakutsk Khanty-Mansiysk Russian Federation Anchorage Lappeenranta Petrozavodsk Whitter Qaqortoq Norway Nizhnevartovsk Helsinki Vyborg Nikiski Valdez Sweden ERMC Kotka T Oslo Issad EC Stavsnas Minsk Tagil NN Kirov Perm’ Homer Seward CO Karsto Cherepovets Bering Sea Labrador Sea ND Stockholm EE-S 1 Tallinn Saint Petersburg ENLA Kingisepp Vologda Ekaterinburg GRE FARICE Baltic Kardla Novgorod Tobol'sk Aldan 60 Dunnet Bay VFS Sea Estonia 60 NorSea Com Luga Kostroma Yoshkar Ola Juneau Draupner Farosund Ventspils Pskov Yaroslavl' Cheboksary ERMC Hawk Inlet Canada DANICE Tve r Tyumen' Lena Point Ula Ivanovo TEA Tomsk Latvia Vladimir Izhevsk Angoon Denmark Rezekne Novgorod Krasnoyarsk Biryusinsk TEA Neryungri AC- 1 Ekofisk Blaabjerg Moscow Naberezhnye Chelny Petersburg Coleraine United Valhala Lithuania Kurgan Novosibirsk Sea Of Okhotsk Sitka Northern Albertsluc Sovetsk Kaluga Ryazan Kazan’ Ufa Chelyabinsk Omsk Wrangell Kingdom Murdoch -1 Sylt Saransk Tynda AKORN Belmullet Ireland Hunmanby AC Kaliningrad Minsk Smolensk Tula Tolyatti Moskalenki Ketchikan ClonshaughGEOEIRGRID Ul’yanovsk ERMC Skovorodino AUE Holyhead Southport Norden Penza Kemerovo SEAK Lusk EBF Germany Samara Barnaul Zeya HIBERNIA ATLANTIC Anglesey Lowestoft Beverwijk Groningen Belarus Bryansk Lipetsk Novokuznetsk Abakan TAT-14 Irish Sea DublinCeltixConnect Oryol Tambov Irkutsk Ireland NetherlandAmsterdam Poland Ulan-Ude Chita Komsomolsk- Katwijk Fuchsstadt Voronezh on-Amur EMERALD NETWORKS HighbridgeLondon Oostende Kursk Saratov Orenburg Kyzyl Somerset Brussels Gorno-Altaysk Blagoveshchensk AUW SS Bude Fiennes Munchen TGN-ATLANTICHIBERNIA ATLANTICEXPRE Belgium JECT Whitesand Bay Frankfurt Prague Kiev Belgorod Heihe NORTH STAR PRO Pottington Gosselies Bonn Zabaykalsk NTIC St. Valery TLA FLAG Goonhilly Luxembourg Czech Rep. Vancouver HIBERNIA ATLANTIC PROJECT EXPRESS ATLANTIC CROSSING2IA A Landsend Lannion Grodekovo Birobidzhan ERN AC-1 BEN Munich Slovakia Ukraine Luhans’k Volgograd Milton HIB Porthcurno Plerin Paris Khabarovsk Harbour Pointe/Snohomish Country Kazakhstan Ulaanbaatar Lynwood HIBERNIA ATLANTIC TAT-14 Zurich Atyrau Fuyuan Penmarch Dijion Austria Moldova Quebec APOLLO FLAG Geneva Aflenz Hungary Odesa Rostov Elista Seattle HIBERNIA ATLANTIC E France Mongolia Harbin P Switzerland Stavropol Nevelsk Warrenton O Slovenia Krasnodar Astrakhan’ Montreal R Romania U Milan Croatia Belgrade Cherkessk Budyonnovsk Florence Halifax ATLANTIC CROSSING 1 E Novorossiysk HSCS APOLLO Bucharest Black Sea Maykop Min. Vody T Bosnia Ussuriysk Wall Township Charlestown S Pyatigoisk Kizlyar Ardon Ivanovka Sea Of PC1 Boston APOLLO E Marseille Serbia Toronto TGN-ATLANTIC & Herzegovina Kislovodsk Japan Hillsboro Stanford TGN-ATLANTIC W Monaco Sochi Grozny TGN-PACIFIC - Bilbao Sofia Nalchik Borhojn-Tal Vladivostok Nakhodka Ishikari Manasquan E N Andorra Italy Kosovo Varna CAUCASUS Vladikavkaz Caspian Newark Brookhaven/Mastic Beach ATLANTIC CROSSING2 R G Montenegro Bulgaria Makhachkala Bandon FLAG T Bellport/Shirley O Georgia Sea Uzbekistan Mountainside H Rome BINTriana Poti Kyrgyzstan S T FYROM Chicago Philadelphia TGN-ATLANTIC F E New York F Azerbaijan N Albania Istanbul RJCN Manchester TAT-14 Portugal Madrid O Adriatic Bari Denver O Armenia Baku Beijing JAPAN-US S R North Ashburn Baltimore Valencia A T Sea Lisbon Spain L H United States Of America FLAG ALGERIA T Greece Tangshan Korea A Turkmenistan Tajikistan Tuckerton APOLLO North Atlantic Ocean Seixal Conil SPAIN AAE-1 Turkey Herndon Cadiz Palermo Mediterranean Sea Athens San Francisco Sesimbra Mazara TGN-PACIFIC Gibraltar Catania Joetsu Kitaibaraki PC-1 TAT-14 MED Marmaris Seoul South JAPAN-US San Jose Washington D.C. GB Chipiona Estepona Annaba Bizerte Pozzallo Pentaskhinos Taean Reston COLUMBUS-III Kelibia EMOS-1 JONAH Qingdao Korea To kyo Ajigaura TGN-Pacific TPE Morro Bay ATLANTIC CROSSING 1 Algiers HANNIBAL Malta Tartus Japan Wada CB-1 ACE F Chania MN Cyprus Pusan Maruyama San Luis Obispo Oran MELITA-1 LAG LEV UGARIT KJCN NinomiyaMiura Asilah NGN- CADMOS Syria Keoje Hiroshima Emi Grover Beach Canarias Sea ATLANTIS-II Ha Yeroskipou Toyohashi Tetouan wk CIOS Tripoli Chikura CHINA-US Lebanon Fukuoka Shima TGN-Pacific Los Angeles Atlanta Bermuda Beriut China PC1 St. David GLO-1 Tripoli Rabat Tunisia Sidon Afghanistan SILPHIUM Iraq Kita-kyushu PC-1 Dallas Paget 30 El Borma Darnah Tel Aviv Iran UNITY Tijuana 30 ALETAR Chongming AAG MAC ALEXANDROSPort Said CANALINK Morocco Salum Abu Talat Shanghai Ghamads Alexandria Al-Faw K-I Nanhui UNITY Austin Houston Ded Deb Suez Jordan CHINA-US MAC Cairo Kuwait Bandar Ganaveh Santa Cruz Ras Sidr SMW3 Kuwait City RNAL SJC JAPAN-US Tenerife Alta Vista Aqaba Bushehr Nepal Larendo Ponta Delgada Gran Canaria Zafarana FOG El Goro Tindouf Khasab Pakistan APCN2 B Halul Is. Bhutan AH Libya Egypt TPE North Pacific Ocean Hollywood AM Laayoune Algeria Al Khobar Bahrain U-I Fuzhou TSE-1 EAC-C2C McAllen A Jask Okinawa Boca Raton S- COLUMBUS-III Manama Das Is. POI Pali Mexico 2 Ghat Sumaisma Xiamen Taipei Gulf Of Mexico Miami QA-U Karachi Tansui Yilan Monterrey Nassau Djanet DohaQatar Fujairah TW1 Bangladesh IACS Jacksonville Abu DhabiDubai ShantouKX TaiwanToucheng FLAG EAC-C2C F Saudi Arabia India Kinmen JAPAN-US Bahamas Crooked Island LO In Amdjel Barka GULF BRIDGE INTERNATIONAL Guangzhou ASE Makaha/ R Mazatlan Cat IslandB I Shenzhen Fangshan D PCCS C Al Seeb Arabian Sea Vietnam APG Keawaula/ ARCOS S O Cox’s Bazar Macau Kahe Pt. Cuba N Caicos Island Muscat Cancum 1 WACS Nouadhibou Wadi Halfa Jeddah Hawaii S SAS-1 Oman Myanmar Hanoi Hong Kong/ Philippine Sea Cayman Islands EAB Kawaihae Guadalajara Tulum Ocho Rios Siboney FIBRALINK RA TGN-Gulf Tseung Kwan O Dominican Republic S- Mauritania In Guezzam Port Sudan Laos RNAL GOKI Mexico City Puerto Plata Tortola St. omas SOUTH A 1 Burma Sea Spencer Beach Half-Moon Bay Antilles-1a MERIC Mumbai IACS CHINA-US JamaicaPort-au-Prince San Juan Nanny Cay A-1 Ballesteros GLOBENET Nouakchott Mali Niger MENA South AAG Harbour Haiti Haina Puerto Rico Anguilla PAC Belize City MAYA - 1 View St. Maarten SMW4 Pyapon China Morant EASTWEST ALBA-1Punta Cana Al Ghaydah FALCON La Union Belize St. Croix Antigua Eritrea ailand Da Nang Sea Puerto Barrios Point Khartoum Al Hudaydah EIG FLAG APCN2 Puerto Lempira Le Lamentin AMERICAS-II Senegal Yemen SMW3 Bay Of Bengal Guatermala Caribbean Sea Isla Verde Dakar Mopti Sudan Manila Puerto Cortes Trujillo Guadeloupe Dominica Chad /Capepisa CFX-1 Tambacounda TGN-EA /Tata TGN-Eurasia Bangkok Nasugbu Tanguisson Honduras ECFS Niamey IMeWe BBG Poipet Daet AAG Martinique Katsina El Genana Aden SEACOM Chennai Piti Puerto San Jose Puerto Cabezas Hudishibana St. Lucia Barbados Gambia Batangas Guam Nicaragua Baby Beach Barbados Banjul Burkina Faso N’Djamena TIC Phetchaburi Sri RachaCambodiaHo Chi Minh Tumon Bay El Salvador St. Vincent Philippines Bluefields Maria Battery Pratt Willemstad Bissau Sambangalou Bamako Ouagadougou Djibouti Phnom Penh City EAC-C2C Grenada Palmarejo MAIN ONE SMW4 GLOBENET Guinea Bissau Porga BBG Chiquita Punto Fijo Chaguaramas Cape Verde Guinea El Damazin Galafi Sihanouk Ville Riohacha Port of Spain Djibouti Cochin i2i H Puerto Limon Leraba SJC A Costa Rica Trinidad & Tobago Benin Mendi TEAMS NT Barranquilla Conakry Nigeria Tuticorin Vung Tau RU Unqui Addis Ababa Trivandrum Lakshadweep Sea -1 Colon Cartagena La Guaira SGSCS Sierra Côte Sri SOUTHERN CROSS GhanaTo g o Abuja Songkhla AAE-1 Panama Tolu Caracas Camuri Freetown d’ Ivoire Ethiopia Kulhudhuffushi BL Lanka FLAG Fort Amador Ustupo Leone Daloa Cotonou WARF Satun APG Palau Panama City Puerto Viejo Maiquetia Lome Central Colombo Liberia Lagos South Sudan Goba Eydhafushi Maluku Sea Ebeye Monrovia Accra African Republic FALCONLANKA BELL Mt Lavinia AAE-1 Balboa Venezuela Georgetown Abidjan Kebri Dehar Hulhumalé Penang TIS Medellin Parimaribo Negele Dhangethi MaleDHIRAAGU-SLT Telisai Aboisso Lokichoggio EASSy Brunei Majuro Guyana GLO-1 LimbeCameroon Mandera Laamu Gan DDSCN Chongming Kitalbarakl Chikura Cayenne ATLANTICA-1 Douala Somalia Gadhdhoo Medan Kuala Lumpar Tungku Pohnpei APCN 2 AMERICA MOVIL1 Gulu Fuvahmulah MalaysiaKuantan Mersing China Japan Japan Suriname Melaka A French Guiana Kribi Maldives C Colombia /Tata TGN-Eurasia Tanjung Pandan Rengit I Hithadhoo BRCS SAC/LAN Uganda Mogadishu BDM Johor Singapore R Equatorial E Sao Tome Bata Dumai /Changi/Katong Guinea Kenya DMCS Tuas M Kampala Sangata A 0 & Principe SEACOM Lantau Pusan Batangas Tanshui 0 Libreville Batam MIC-1 Pontianak N BSCS JaKa2LaDeMa SOUTH AMERICA-1 Rep. Of e A AJC Hong Kong South Korea Philippines Taiwan P Santana Jabung BSCS Sungai Kakap Manta Gabon Congo Indonesia Nairobi Sakernan Ecuador Democratic Rwanda Ketapang
Recommended publications
  • Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas
    ITUPublications International Telecommunication Union Study period 2018-2021 Development Sector Study Group 1 Question 5 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote areas Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote areas Study period 2018-2021 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote: Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 for the study period 2018-2021 ISBN 978-92-61-34591-4 (Electronic version) ISBN 978-92-61-34601-0 (EPUB version) ISBN 978-92-61-34611-9 (Mobi version) © International Telecommunication Union 2021 International Telecommunication Union, Place des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Some rights reserved. This work is licensed to the public through a Creative Commons Attribution- Non- Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that ITU endorses any specific organization, product or service. The unauthorized use of the ITU name or logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a transla- tion of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ITU is not respon- sible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory, Infrastructure and Tariff Aspects of Electronic
    MM www.idate.org The European way to think the Digital World Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the Outermost Regions (OR) A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Prepared for the European Commission DG Regional Policy December 2005 This study was financed by the European Community and was performed by IDATE and LL&A in partnership with INESC PORTO (Portugal) and MM (Spain). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors only and under no circumstances are to be construed as those of the European Commission. IDATE – BP4167 – 34092 Montpellier cedex 5 – Tel : +33(0)467 144 444 – Fax : +33(0)467 144 400 – [email protected] Regulatory, infrastructure and tariff aspects of electronic communications and broadband connectivity in the ORs: A comparison of the current situation with that in the rest of the Community and neighbouring countries Final report Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. State of the art of telecommunications in the ORs....................................................................... 9 1.1. Networks and services............................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Regulation and competition ................................................................................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions
    December 2019 Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions Lauren Dickey, Erica Downs, Andrew Taffer, and Heidi Holz with Drew Thompson, S. Bilal Hyder, Ryan Loomis, and Anthony Miller Maps and graphics created by Sue N. Mercer, Sharay Bennett, and Michele Deisbeck Approved for Public Release: distribution unlimited. IRM-2019-U-019755-Final Abstract This report provides a general map of the information environment of the Pacific Island Countries (PICs). The focus of the report is on the information environment—that is, the aggregate of individuals, organizations, and systems that shape public opinion through the dissemination of news and information—in the PICs. In this report, we provide a current understanding of how these countries and their respective populaces consume information. We map the general characteristics of the information environment in the region, highlighting trends that make the dissemination and consumption of information in the PICs particularly dynamic. We identify three factors that contribute to the dynamism of the regional information environment: disruptors, deficits, and domestic decisions. Collectively, these factors also create new opportunities for foreign actors to influence or shape the domestic information space in the PICs. This report concludes with recommendations for traditional partners and the PICs to support the positive evolution of the information environment. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor or client. Distribution Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 12/10/2019 Cooperative Agreement/Grant Award Number: SGECPD18CA0027. This project has been supported by funding from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiki Cable Project Presentation
    South Pacific region specificity L.os Angeles Hawaii q Huge distances Hawaii q Limited populaons Guam Kiribati Nauru q Isolaon issues Tuvalu Tokelau Papua New Guinea Solomon Wallis Samo a American Samoa q Need for cheaper Vanuatu French Polynesia and faster bandwidth New CaledoniaFiji Niue Tong Cook Island a q Satellite bandwidth Norfolk Sydney price over 1500 USD / Mbps Auckland 2 Existing systems in South Pacific region q Southern Cross : Sydney - Auckland - Hawaii - US west coast - Suva - Sydney ü Capacity: 6 Tb/s ü End of life: 2020 q Endeavour (Telstra) : Sydney - Hawaii HawaiiHawaii ü Capacity: 1,2 Tb/s ü End of life: 2034 Guam q Gondwana : Nouméa - Sydney ü Capacity: 640 Gb/s Madang Honiara Apia ü End of life: 2033 Wallis Port Vila Pago Pago Tahiti Suva q Honotua : Tahi - Hawaii Noumea Nuku’alofa ü Capacity: 640 Gb/s Norfolk Is. ü End of life: 2035 Sydney Auckland q ASH : Pago-Pago - Hawaii ü Capacity: 1 Gb/s ü End of life: 2014 / 2015 ? (no more spare parts) ü SAS cable : Apia - Pago Pago 3 Hawaiki cable project overview q Project summary ü Provide internaonal bandwidth to Australia + New Zealand + Pacific Islands ü Propose point to point capacity via 100 Gb/s wavelengths ü System design capacity : 20 Tbps ü 2 step project q Time schedule ü Q1 2013 : signature of supplier contract ü Service date : 2015 q Project development by Intelia (www.intelia.nc) ü Leading telecom integrator ü Partnership with Ericsson, ZTE, Telstra, Prysmian, etc… ü 2011 turnover > USD 40M Commercial references : ü Supply and installaon of 3G+ mobile network in NC ü IP transit service for Gondwana cable in Sydney Submarine cable experience - in partnership with ASN: ü New Caledonia cable : Gondwana in 2008 - 2 100 km ü French Polynesia cable : Honotua in 2010 - 4 500 km 4 Hawaiki Cable Step 1 Main backbone / Strategic route Hawaii California Hawaii Guam Madang Honiara Pago Pago Wallis Apia Tahiti Port Vila Suva Noumea Niue Nuku’alofa Rarotonga Norfolk Is.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of EDGE CABLE HOLDINGS USA, LLC, File No. SCL-LIC-2020-____________ AQUA COMMS (AMERICAS) INC., AQUA COMMS (IRELAND) LIMITED, CABLE & WIRELESS AMERICAS SYSTEMS, INC., AND MICROSOFT INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, LLC, Application for a License to Land and Operate a Private Fiber-Optic Submarine Cable System Connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, to Be Known as THE AMITIÉ CABLE SYSTEM JOINT APPLICATION FOR CABLE LANDING LICENSE— STREAMLINED PROCESSING REQUESTED Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 34, Executive Order No. 10,530, and 47 C.F.R. § 1.767, Edge Cable Holdings USA, LLC (“Edge USA”), Aqua Comms (Americas) Inc. (“Aqua Comms Americas”), Aqua Comms (Ireland) Limited (“Aqua Comms Ireland,” together with Aqua Comms Americas, “Aqua Comms”), Cable & Wireless Americas Systems, Inc. (“CWAS”), and Microsoft Infrastructure Group, LLC (“Microsoft Infrastructure”) (collectively, the “Applicants”) hereby apply for a license to land and operate within U.S. territory the Amitié system, a private fiber-optic submarine cable network connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The Applicants and their affiliates will operate the Amitié system on a non-common-carrier basis, either by providing bulk capacity to wholesale and enterprise customers on particularized terms and conditions pursuant to individualized negotiations or by using the Amitié cable system to serve their own internal business connectivity needs. The existence of robust competition on U.S.-U.K., U.S.-France, and (more broadly) U.S.-Western Europe routes obviates any need for common-carrier regulation of the system on public-interest grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Subsea Telecommunications & Its
    The Story of Subsea Telecommunications 02 & its Association with Enderby House By Stewart Ash INTRODUCTION The modern world of instant communications 1850 - 1950: the telegraph era began, not in the last couple of decades - but 1950 - 1986: the telephone era more than 160 years ago. Just over 150 years 1986 until today, and into the future: the optical era ago a Greenwich-based company was founded that became the dominant subsea cable system In the telegraph era, copper conductors could supplier of the telegraph era, and with its carry text only — usually short telegrams. During successors, helped to create the world we know the telephone era, technology had advanced today. enough for coaxial cables to carry up to 5,680 simultaneous telephone calls. And in today’s On 7 April 1864, the Telegraph Construction and optical era, fibres made of glass carry multi- Maintenance Company Ltd, better known for most wavelengths of laser light, providing terabits of of its life as Telcon, was incorporated and began its data for phone calls, text, internet pages, music, global communications revolution from a Thames- pictures and video. side site on the Greenwich Peninsula. Today, high capacity optic fibre subsea cables For more than 100 years, Telcon and its successors provide the arteries of the internet and are the were the world’s leading suppliers of subsea primary enablers of global electronic-commerce. telecommunications cable and, in 1950, dominated the global market, having manufactured and For over 160 years, the Greenwich peninsula has supplied 385,000 nautical miles (714,290km) of been at the heart of this technological revolution, cable, 82% of the total market.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Fibre Submarine Systems
    Optical fibre submarine GREENLAND systems D N ALASKA A (USA) ICELAND L Umeå N Vestmannaeyjar BOTNIA I Vaasa F Faroes SWEDEN Rauma RUSSIA 6 x 622 Turku Hallstavik Whittier Valdez Karst 2 + 1 x 2.5 Gbit/s Norrtälje Kingisepp Seward Tallin NORWAY ESTONIA U N Lena I 2 x 560 LATVIA CANTAT-3 T point AC-1 E DENMARK CANADA D Westerland LITHUANIA Northstar 2 x 4 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s TAT-14 K I N REP. OF IRELAND G BELORUSSIA TAT-10 2 + 1 x 560 D S D Norden/ N O LA Grossheide ER POLAND M TH NE GERMANY Gemini North 2 x 6 (WDM) x 2.5 Gbit/s BELGIUM CZECH Dieppe REP. Port UKRAINE Alberni NPC 3 + 1 x 420 St Brieuc SLOVAK REP. M O KAZAKHSTAN L FRANCE D Seattle AC-1 AUSTRIA A V TPC-5 2 x 5 Gbit/s HUNGARY I Tillamook PTAT-1 3 + 1 x 420 Gbit/s SWITZ. I A A Odessa DM) x 2.5 St Hilaire de Riez SLOVEN 2 x 6 (W MONGOLIA i South FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s emin CROATIA ROMANIA Pacific G Y I U Novorossijsk City Pennant Point HERZEGOVINABOSNIA- G s T O 2.5 SochiGbit/s PC-1 Medway Harbour Gbit/ S x 5 L TAT-11 3 DxM 560) A Varna Shirley x 3 (W A V Nakhodka TAT-12 2 x 3 (WDM) x 5 Gbit/s 2 I GEORGIA Ishikati TAT-13 A BULGARIA UZBEKISTAN Rhode Island F L PC-1 L ALBANIA Poti A KYRGYZSTAN N Long Island G Y TAT-9 2 + 1 x 560 ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN New York MACEDONIA TURKMENISTAN NORTH Bandon TAT-8 2 x 280 Istanbul KOREA FLAG Atlantic-1 160 Gbit/s Azores SPAIN E R-J-K C 2 x 560 0 EE 6 R 5 G Dalian A CANUS-1 TAT-14 PORTUGAL TURKEY JIH CableProject Japan-US Manasquan Lisbon UNITED STATES 3x TAJIKISTAN Point Sesimbra PC-1 Arena Tuckerton Marmaris Yantaï SOUTH P TPC-4 2 x 560 A S
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study
    INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU WORKSHOP ON Document: CNI/05 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL 20 May 2002 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES Seoul, Republic of Korea — 20 - 22 May 2002 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES: KOREAN CASE STUDY Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study This case study has been prepared by Dr. Chaeho Lim <[email protected]>. Dr Cho is Visiting Professor at the Korean Institute of Advanced Science & Technology, in the Infosec Education and Hacking, Virus Research Centre. This case study, Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study, is part of a series of Telecommunication Case Studies produced under the New Initiatives programme of the Office of the Secretary General of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Other country case studies on Critical Network Infrastructures can be found at <http://www.itu.int/cni>. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Telecommunication Union, its membership or the Korean Government. The author wishes to acknowledge Mr Chinyong Chong <[email protected]> of the Strategy and Policy Unit of ITU for contributions to the paper. The paper has been edited by the ITU secretariat. The author gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance of all those who have contributed information for this report. In particular, thanks are due to staff of Ministry of Information and Communication and Korean Information Security Agency for their help and suggestions. 2/27 Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on the Asian Telecom Connectivity Market
    Asian Telecom Connectivity Market: Executive Summary (Research conducted 2005) The following is a summary of the findings of the Telecommunications Research Project University of Hong Kong NOTE1 The original research was undertaken for a private client in 2005 and the detailed report and recommendations are therefore not publicly available, but the following Executive Summary was made available at the time to companies who provided information and their opinions. In respect of demand and supply, the research goes beyond the data and analysis provided by TeleGeography (an industry benchmark publication) by estimating various rates of growth of demand against estimates of capacity lit and capacity used, thereby projecting various dates of capacity exhaustion. Unity Cable Since this research the 10,000 km Unity Cable connecting Japan and the USA has been announced (2008) consisting of carriers SingTel, Bharti- Airtel and KDDI, together with Internet companies Google, Pacnet and Global Transit (subsidiary of Malaysian network exchange company, AIMS). 1 This Executive Summary also appears as Appendix 2 in John Ure (ed.) Telecommunications Development in Asia, HKU Press, April 2008 1 Asian Telecom Connectivity Market: Executive Summary2 Between June and August 2005, the Telecommunications Research Project (TRP) at the University of Hong Kong undertook an extensive look at the regional bandwidth market. The research study was undertaken with intent to understand both the supply (and pricing) and demand sides of the equation, based upon feedback direct from carriers and experts, on the one hand, and from those directly purchasing bandwidth on the other. It quickly became apparent that the supply and demand of bandwidth represent two distinct stories which, not only are not necessarily in alignment (obvious enough to anyone who has been watching the market over the last 10 years), but are at times quite seriously disconnected in their fundamental drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • KDDI Global ICT Brochure
    https://global.kddi.com KDDI-Global Networks and IT Solutions Networking, Colocation, System Integration around the world BUILDING YOUR BUSINESS TOGETHER KDDI solutions are at the cutting-edge in all fields of information and communications KDDI, a Fortune Global 500 company, is one of Asia’s largest telecommunications providers, with approximately US$48 billion in annual revenue and a proven track record extending over many years and around the world. We deliver all-round services, from mobile phones to fixed-line communications, making us your one-stop solution provider for telecommunications and IT environments. The high praise and trust enjoyed by our TELEHOUSE data centers positioned around the world have kept us at the forefront of service and quality. Since our establishment in 1953, we have expanded our presence into 28 countries and 60 cities, with over 100 offices around the world supporting the success of our international customers through our high quality services. KDDI’s mobile telephone brand “au” has achieved significant market share in Japan, one of the world’s most comprehensive KDDI Quick Facts communications markets. KDDI’s relationship with over 600 carriers worldwide enables us to provide high-quality international network services in over 190 countries. Our exciting ventures, built on extensive experience, include investment in the “South-East Asia Japan 2 Cable”, which connects 11 locations in 9 countries and territories in Asia. Moreover, as the world moves toward the age of IoT and 5G, KDDI is taking steps to promote IoT business, such as connected cars, support for companies engaged in global business, and the creation of new value for our society.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2015 by ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, S.W. Washin
    (202) 223-7323 (202) 204-7371 [email protected] March 30, 2015 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Joint Application for Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licenses from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. SCL-T/C-20141121-00013 and SCL-T/C-20141121-00014; Applications for Transfer of Control of Section 214 Authorizations from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. ITC-T/C-20141121-00304 and ITC-T/C-20141121-00307 Dear Ms. Dortch: On Thursday, March 26, 2015, the undersigned counsel and representatives of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc (“C&W”) and Columbus Networks, Limited (“CNL”) met with members of the Commission’s staff to discuss the above-cited pending applications, and in particular Digicel’s pleadings and ex parte filing in the proceeding. Doc#: US1:9949275v3 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary 2 Attending this meeting on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc were Belinda Bradbury, General Counsel, and Simeon Irvine, Chief Executive, Wholesale. C&W outside counsel Patrick Campbell and Diane Gaylor of Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also attended. Attending on behalf of Columbus Networks, Limited were Paul Scott, President and Chief Operating Officer, Columbus Networks USA, Inc., and Victor A. Lago, Vice President of Legal Affairs, Columbus Networks USA, Inc. CNL outside counsel Ulises Pin of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP also attended. Commission staff in attendance were, from the International Bureau, Nese Guendelsberger, Deputy Bureau Chief (by phone); Kathleen Collins, Assistant Bureau Chief; Walt Strack, Assistant Bureau Chief and Chief Economist; Howard Griboff, Acting Division Chief, Policy Division; David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Policy Division; Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division; Jodi Cooper, Senior Attorney, Policy Division; and, from the Office of General Counsel, James Bird.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Submarine Cable Market Industry Report
    submarine telecoms INDUSTRY REPORT 2013 Authored by Submarine Cable Industry Report Issue 2 March 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. 21495 Ridgetop Circle Suite 201 Sterling, Virginia 20166 USA www.subtelforum.com ISSN: pending 2 Disclaimer: While every care is taken in preparation of this publication, the publishers cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information herein, or any errors which may occur in advertising or editorial content, or any consequence arising from any errors or omissions, and the editor reserves the right to edit any advertising or editorial material submitted for publication. If you have a suggestion, please let us know by emailing [email protected]. 3 Table of Contents 1. Foreword 10 2. Introduction 11 3. Executive Summary 13 4. Worldwide Market Analysis and Outlook 18 4.1 Overview of Historical System Investment 20 4.2 2008 – 2012 Systems in Review 20 4.3 Systems Investment in 2013 and Beyond 21 5. Supplier Analysis 25 5.1 System Suppliers 25 5.2 Upgrade Suppliers 26 6. Ownership Analysis 28 6.1 Financing of Current Submarine Systems 28 7. Regional Market Analysis and Capacity Outlook 31 7.1 Transatlantic
    [Show full text]