DOCSLIB.ORG

Und Siegfried H. Horn-Museums

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Und Siegfried H. Horn-Museums Zur Geschichte des Andrews University- und Siegfried H. Horn-Museums - 50 Jahre (1970 - 2020) A Review over a half century history of the Andrews University- and Siegfried H. Horn Archaeological Museum in Berrien Springs, MI 1 Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, ABA ABA.GB Nr./GSGBA.CC Nu. 7 2020 “Dedicated to the Friends and Successors of Siegfried H. Horn Endowed Scholarship Fund“ Inhalt Vorbemerkung 1. Die Zeit Siegfried H. Horns als Gründer und Kurator mit Assistent- Kurator Eugenia L. Nitowski (1971 - 1980) eines Museums mit Vorgeschichte 1.1 Zur Vorgeschichte des Museums und die 'Hardford Cuneiform Tablet Collection' 1.2 Jahrzehnte Studien und Publikationen der Keilschriftexperten 1.3 Zur ' SDAS Assyrian Kinglist ' 1.4 Zum 'Andrews University Archaeological Museum' (AUAM) - Inventare und Sammlungen 1.5 Das Gewicht archäologischer Ausgrabungen für den Aufbau des Museums 1Der Aufsatz von Gotthard G.G. Reinhold ist im Januar/Februar 2020 nur als Review geschrieben worden. Eine Vollständigkeit aller Quellen, vor allem der Mitarbeiter des Museums in Berrien Springs, MI, USA, des Institutspersonals vom Institute of Archaeology oder der Grabungsmitglieder der verschiedenen Ausgra- bungen und Surveys in Jordanien und anderer Ausgrabungen war nicht Ziel des Verfassers. Man möge ihm dies nachsehen. Was die spezifischen Funktionen von Instituts-, Museums- oder anderen Mitarbeitern in der ASOR in der USA und der ACOR, Amman betrifft, vor allem auch deren nationale und internationale Meetings und Konferenzen, an denen die Institutionen der Andrews University mit ihren Wissenschaftlern beteiligt waren, sind diese aufgrund des Aufsatzumfanges – außer von S.H. Horn (ACOR) - nicht zusätzlich erfaßt worden. Bei Angaben der geführten Ausgrabungen in MPP und AUSS erscheinen in der Literaturanzeige nicht zusätzlich die Autoren. Zu einer kurzen Zusammenfassung der 50-Jahrfeier 1970 - 2020 siehe: Robert Bates, MPP at 50 Years, Newsletter Inst.Arch,.HAM,.AU, Vol. 41.3 Summer 2020, 2 - 3. 2. Die Zeit der Institutsdirektoren Lawrence T. Geraty (1982 - 1985), William H. Shea (1985 - 1986), J. Bjørnar Storfjell (1986 - 1987) und des Kurators Lawrence T. Geraty (1976 - 1985) - Ein Museum mit Repräsentation – Erste größere Ausstellungen und internationale Verbindungen 2.1 Das 'Madaba Plains Project (MPP)' unter Projekt- und Gründungsdirektor des 'Institute of Archaeology (IA)' Lawrence T. Geraty und die Ausweitung archäologischer Grabungsplätze - Gründung des Siegfried H.Horn Museum (HAM), Ausstellungen und Vorträge von Fachexperten 2.2. Zur Direktorenschaft von William H. Shea am 'Institute of Archaeology (IA)' und neue Museumsausstellungen 3. Die Zeit des Institutsdirektors Randall W. Younker (1988 - z.Zt.) und David Merling als Kurator am Siegfried H. Horn-Museum (1986 - 2006) - Museale Veränderungen und der Beginn eines neuen Museumsstandortes 3.1 Archäologische Ausgrabungen des ' Madaba Plains Project (MPP)' (1987, 1989) und die Mt. Carmel-Ausgrabung (1988) 3.2 Neue 'Siegfried H. Horn Archaeological Museum Lecture Series' (1986/87 - 1988/89), Ausstellungen und Museumsneueröffnung (1988) 3.3 Ereignisreiche Jahre am Institut und Museum in den Jahren 1990 bis 1993: Archäologische Mitarbeit auf Tell Gezer, Israel, die Weiterführung des MPP-Projektes, neue 'Siegfried H. Horn Archaeological Museum Lecture Series' , die Übernahme der ' S.H. Horn Library' (HAL) und der Tod des Museumsgründers (1993) 3.4. Die archäologische Forschung und die Museums- und Vortragschronologie in den Jahren 1994 bis 1996 und 1997 bis 2006 3.5 Die Jahre der 2003 bis 2006 bis zur Beendigung der Kuratorschaft von David Merling: Gravierende Veränderungen für Institut und Museum, neue archäologische Projekte, Ausstellungen und die Chronologie der 'Siegfried H.Horn Archaeological Museum Lecture Series' (2003 - 2006) 4 . Das Institut unter Randall W. Younker (1988 - z.Zt.) und der Kuratorin des Siegfried H. Horn-Museum Constance E. Clark Gane (2007 - z.Zt.) - Expandierende Ausgrabungen (AT und NT), Präsentation des neuen Museums und Chronologie der 'Siegfried H. Horn Archaeological Museum Lecture Series' 4.1 Expandierende Ausgrabungen und archäologische Mitarbeit: Naher Osten, Ägäis und Europa (2007 - 2019) 4.2 Zur Neugestaltung des Instituts- und Museumgebäudes, den besonderen Festlichkei- ten und der Vielfalt attraktiver Ausstellungen im 'S.H. Horn Archaeological Museum' 4.3 Eine Chronologie der 'Siegfried H.Horn Archaeological Museum Lecture Series', 'Research Symposia' und 'NEH Summer Institute for School Teacher' (2006/2007 - 2018) Zusammenfassung/Summary & Author Abkürzungen Literatur Tafeln Vorbemerkung Siegfried Herbert Nathan Horn (1908 - 1993) Das Siegfried H. Horn2 -Museum, Berrien Springs, MI, USA begeht 2020 den 50. Jahrestag seit seiner Gründung am 17. Januar 19703, als das 'Archaeological Museum of the SDA 2 Zu Siegfried Herbert Nathan Horn siehe: Lloyd A. Willis, Archaeology in Adventist Literature 1937- 1980, AUS DDS VII, Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 1982, 191- 341, 477 - 486, 538 - 540; Who’s Who in Biblical Studies and Archaeology. First Edition 1986 - 1987, Washington, D.C.: Biblical Archaeology Society, 1986, 103, sowie: Lawrence T. Geraty, From the Archives: Beyond Fundamentalism: Short History of Old Testament Scholarship, https://spectrummaga-zine.org/article/2017/04/19/beyond-fundamentalism-short-history-adventist-old- testament-sholarship publ. L.T. Geraty, Apr. 18 , 2017. Zu einer Einschätzung des W.F. Albright-Schülers S. H. Horn als Wissenschaftler auf dem Fachgebiet der “Biblischen Archäologie“, als persönlicher Freund und aufgrund jahrzehntelanger Korrespondenz (1972 bis Theological Seminary, Andrews University' offiziell eingeweiht wurde. Mit der Vergrö- ßerung der Ausstellung war 1976 ein Wechsel in das Gebäude des 'Archaeological Institute' notwendig geworden, in dem sich nun das 'Andrews University Archaeological Museum' (AUAM)4 befand. Mit Siegfried S. H. Horns Pensionierung und seiner Jahrzehnte währenden Lebensleistung als Theologe (B.A., M.A.), Ägyptologe (Ph.D.), als “Prof. of Archaeology and History of Antiquity“ und “Dean of the Andrews University“, als Stabsmitglied der Drew-McCormick-Expedition auf Tell Balatah (bibl. Sichem)5, Israel (1960, 1962, 1964), als Direktor der Tell Ḥesbân-Ausgrabungen (bibl. Hesbon) in den Jahren 1968, 1971 und 19736 und als erster ACOR-Direktor , Amman (1970 - 1971)7 wurde das AUAM im Oktober 19788 auf seinen Namen 'Siegfried H. Horn Archaeological Museum'(HAM) umbenannt. 1992) und der Nachricht seines Abblebens 1993 (von Elisabeth Horn, geb. Leppers) mit dem Theologen, Altorientalisten, Palästinaarchäologen und Ägyptologen - auch über die Teilung Deutschlands hinweg - siehe : Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, 25 Jahre Arbeitsgruppe für Biblische Archäologie, ABA.GB Nr. 6 / GSGBA.C.C. Nu. 6 2019, bes. Anm. 17. 3 Siehe hierzu Friedbert Ninow Das Archäologische Museum der Andrews Universität, Stufen 38 – Sommer 1989, 26 - 30, bes. 27/28; Walter Bromba, Personalia.Nachruf: Siegfried H. Horn 1908 - 1093, Stufen Nr. 46 - 22. Jg. 1 Dez. 1993, 18 - 19 , bes. 19 (Misprint: p. 18: (1908 - 1993) instead of (1908 - 1093). Siehe: Leona Glidden Running, Siegfried H. Horn 1908 - 1993. IN MEMORIAM, Newsletter Inst Arch HAM, Vol. 14, No. 3 - 4, Summer-Fall 1993, 1- 3; Nancy Vymeister, Siegfried H. Horn: 1908 - 1993. A Tribute, AUSS Vol. 32, Nu. 1-2 Spring-Summer 1994, 4 - 6. 4 Siehe hierzu Institute of Archaeology & Siegfried H.Horn Museum, https://andrewsarchaeology.org/museum/ history-of-the-siegfried-h-horn-museum/ . 5 S. H. Horn studierte hier überwiegend die Keramik des Fundmaterials und als Ägyptologe auch die Skara- bäenfunde zurückliegender Kampagnen der Jahre 1913 und 1914 , die er mit den Funden aus den Jahren 1960, 1962 und 1964 vergleichen konnte, daneben aber auch mit anderen Fundstücken Palästinas: Siehe hierzu Gotthard G.G. Reinhold (2003), 17 - 18; S.H. Horn/Lenen G. Moulds, Pottery from Shechem. Excavated 1913 and 1914, AUSS VII/1 1969, 16 - 46, Plates I - IX; sowie S. H. Horn, Palestinian Scarabs at Andrews University, AUSS Vol. X/2 July 1972, 142 - 146, darunter auch Exemplare im AUM. 6 Zu Tell Ḥesbân siehe: Larry G. Herr, The Search for Biblical Heshbon, BARev 19, Nov. - Dec. 1993, 36 - 37.68 und Lawrence T. Geraty, In Memoriam: Siegfried H. Horn BARev 20, March-April 1994, 22.24. 7 Zu den ersten 25 Jahren der ACOR Amman und zum Direktorat von S.H. Horn siehe: ACOR: The First 25 Years, ACOR Newsletter Vol. 5.1 Summer 1993, 4 - 9, bes. 5 (Founding of ACOR), sowie ACOR Newsletter Vol. 5.2 – Winter 1993, 16. Siehe vor allem: ACOR: The First 25 Years. The American Center of Oriental Research: 1968 - 1993, Amman: ACOR, 1993, 35 (Directors, Fellows & Annual Professors), 51 - 54 (Heshbon). 8Siehe Museum Renaming, 1978 : https://andrewsarchaeology.org/museum/history-of-the-siegfried-h-horn- museum/ . Im Gegensatz dazu 1982, so Friedbert Ninow, Anm. 2 und ders. Siegfried Horn – Ein Leben für die Bibel Spes Christiana Bd. 9- 10/1998 - 99, 86 - 97, bes. 95, sowie Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, Siegfried Herbert Nathan Horn (1908 - 1993), in: Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, hrsg. Bei Sonnenaufgang auf dem Tell. At Sunrise on the Tell. Essays about decades researches in the field of Near Eastern Archaeology, Remshalden: Verlag Bernhard Albert Greiner, 2003, [9 - 12] 13 - 24 (Misprints: p.16: 1978 instead of 1976; p.17: SDAS Assyrian Kinglist instead of SDA Seminary King List ). 1. Die Zeit Siegfried H. Horns als Gründer und Kurator und Assistent-Kurator Eugenia L. Nitowski (1971 - 1980)9 eines Museums mit Vorgeschichte 1.1 Zur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Times of Israel Newly Deciphered Moabite Inscription May Be First Use
    The Times of Israel https://www.timesofisrael.com/newly-deciphered-moabite-inscription-may-be-first-use-of- written-word-hebrews/ Newly deciphered Moabite inscription may be first use of written word ‘Hebrews’ Cylindrical altar from 3,000 years ago found in Jordan also offers first evidence of early Moabite script — and could repaint picture of geopolitics in the ancient Levantine world By AMANDA BORSCHEL-DAN 28 August 2019, 7:24 pm7 Inscribed late 9th or early 8th century BCE altar that was discovered in a Moabite sanctuary at the Khirbat Ataruz site in central Jordan in 2010. (Courtesy of Adam Bean) • Inscribed late 9th or early 8th century BCE altar from a Moabite sanctuary as found in situ at the Khirbat Ataruz site in central Jordan in 2010. (Courtesy) • Moabite sanctuary and stepped structure at the Khirbat Ataruz site in central Jordan. (Courtesy) • Aerial view of the Khirbat Ataruz site in central Jordan. (APAAME) • 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 The earliest written use of the word “Hebrews” may have been found upon an inscribed Moabite altar discovered during ongoing excavations at the biblical site of Atarot (Khirbat Ataruz) in Jordan. The two newly deciphered late 9th century or very early 8th century BCE Moabite inscriptions incised into the cylindrical stone altar serve as tangible historical anchors for a battle of epic proportions. According to researcher Adam Bean’s Levant article on the find, “An inscribed altar from the Khirbat Ataruz Moabite sanctuary,” the inscriptions offer new insight into the bloody aftermath of the conquest of Atarot that is described in the famed Mesha Stele and in the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Byu Religious Education FALL 2017 REVIEW
    byu religious education FALL 2017 REVIEW CALENDAR COMMENTS INTERVIEWS & SPOTLIGHTS STUDENT & TEACHER UPDATES BOOKS Becoming Scholar-Teachers Recently retired religious educator Kent P. Jackson message from the deans’ office Thinking Globally at the RSC n our day, it seems, everyone is thinking global. INowhere is global perspective more exciting than in the context of the gospel. The story of Church expansion in the international setting over the past several decades has been truly phenomenal. A recently published RSC volume, The Worldwide Church, indicates that over the last thirty years the Church has grown abroad over 500 percent. Fortuitously, this period of growth has coincided with the emergence of the Religious Studies Center as a significant publisher of Church history. As we reflect on the recent growth of the Church, we wonder what the membership of the Church will look like in the coming decades. The answer to this question has important implications for the RSC and its mission to “encourage and publish faithful scholarship.” Publishing works on global Church history and advancement of the Church worldwide has been a key commitment of the RSC. The list of recent RSC publications dedicated to such history includes Mormons in the Piazza: History of the Latter-day Saints in Italy, The Field Is White: Harvest in the Three Counties of England, Voice of the Saints in Taiwan, and Canadian Mormons. As the Church continues to grow and expand into various areas of the world, there will continue to be a wealth of opportunities to tell the story of LDS beginnings in these places.
    [Show full text]
  • Recently Discovered Moabite Altar: Proof of Biblical Battle in Kings 2 by BIN Staff August 29, 2019 , 3:04 Pm
    Breaking Israel News/Latest News Biblical Perspective https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/136246/recently-discovered-moabite-altar-proof-biblical-battle- kings-2/ Recently Discovered Moabite Altar: Proof of Biblical Battle in Kings 2 By BIN staff August 29, 2019 , 3:04 pm But when Achav died, the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Yisrael. (Kings 2 3:5) ancient battle (courtesy: Shutterstock) FacebookTwitterEmailWhatsAppPrintShare 800 The word “Hebrews” was recently discovered on an ancient Moabite altar unearthed by archaeologists in Jordan. The altar was located at the biblical site of Atarot (Khirbat Ataruz) in Jordan reports TOI. Ataruz inscribed altar (c Lead epigrapher Christopher Rollston says that the find “stitches together the Biblical and inscriptional evidence”. Researcher Adam Bean explains that regarding the biblical story, “it is a new and important piece in the puzzle.” The discovery found two 9th century/ early 8th century BCE Moabite writings engraved into the cylindrical stone altar provide historical indications of a “battle of epic proportions”. Researcher Adam Bean of John Hopkins University describes the find as: “An inscribed altar from the Khirbat Ataruz Moabite sanctuary”. the inscriptions provide new insight regarding King Mesha of Moab’s revolt against Israel: Now King Mesha of Moab was a sheep breeder, and he used to pay as tribute to the king of Yisrael a hundred thousand lambs and the wool of a hundred thousand rams. But when Achav died, the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Yisrael. (Kings 2 3:4-5) “The inscriptions on this ‘pedestal’ come from the site mentioned by King Mesha in his Mesha Stele as a site that he himself (i.e., Mesha) took from the Omrides and then rebuilt!” noted leading epigrapher Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Moab in Archäologie, Bibel Und Geschichte Anhand Ausgewählter Moabitischer Ortschaften Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, ABA AB
    Moab in Archäologie, Bibel und Geschichte anhand ausgewählter 1 moabitischer Ortschaften Gotthard G.G. Reinhold, ABA ABA - Gesammelte Beiträge Nr. 5 2019 GSGBA - Collected Contributions Nu. 5 2019 Inhaltsverzeichnis: 1. Transjordanien als Durchzugsgebiet von altorientalischen Händlern und Heeren an- hand archäologischer Hinterlassenschaften : Moab in ältesten außerbiblischen und biblischen Schriftzeugnissen des 2. Jahrtausends v. Chr. 2. Zu den schriftlichen Quellen und zur Ikonographie von Hinterlassenschaften ausgewähl- ter moabitischer Ortschaften vom Übergang des 2. bis zum 1. Jahrtausend v.Chr. 2. 1 Schriftliche und ikonographische Quellen aus dem Gebiet von Ḏībān 2. 1. 1 Das frühmoabitsche Inschriftenfragment aus Ḏībān (= DF) 2. 1. 2 Der Krughenkel aus Ḏībān (= DK ) 2. 1. 3 Das Ḏībān Ostrakon (= DO) 2. 1. 4 Moabitische Siegel aus Ḏībān 2. 1. 5 Zur Meš -Stele (= MI), Tel Dan-Inschrift und den Dwd-Stellen beider Inschriften 2.1.5.1 Zur Auffindung und Rekonstruktion der Mešaʽ -Inschrift (= MI) 2.1.5.2 Einiges zur Paläographie und Datierung der Steleninschrift 2.1.5.3 Zur Transkription und Übersetzung der Mešaʽ-Inschrift nach Gotthard G.G. Reinhold und einigen Besonderheiten des Textinhaltes 1 Das Mkr. zum Landgebiet von Moab in Archäologie, Bibel und Geschichte anhand ausgewählter moabitischer Ortschaften ist im Zeitraum Monat Jan. - März 2019 entstanden. Im Monat Juli und September 2019 hat der Verfasser aufgrund weiterer Studien zu den moabitischen Inschriften der MPIA (Abschn. 2.1.5.4), der PIB ( Absch. 2.3.3) und der MRI, bzw. des MF (2.5) neues Forschungsmaterial ausgewertet und die aktuellen Ergebnisse hinzugefügt. Sämtliche Kopien von Abbildungen, die der Verfasser benutzt hat, sind in den Bildunterschriften mit genauer Herkunft bezeichnet worden und können jederzeit in der benutzten Literatur überprüft werden, während Farbfotos von den archäologischen Ausgrabungen des MPP, Jordanien, vom Verfasser oder von Mitarbeitern stammen.
    [Show full text]
  • Khirbat 'Ataruz 2011-2012: a Preliminary Report
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 52, No. 1, 47-91. Copyright © 2014 Andrews University Press. KHIRBAT ‘ATARUZ 2011-2012: A PRELIMINARY REPORT CHANG-HO JI ROBERT D. BATES La Sierra University Andrews University Riverside, California Berrien Springs, Michigan Introduction The ancient ruins of Khirbat ‘Ataruz are perched on a ridge overlooking the Dead Sea above the Wadi Zarqa Main on the north, and the Wadi Sayl Haydan on the south. It is located 24 km south of the town of Madaba, 10 km west of the village Libb and 3 km east of the ancient site of Machaerus, in Jordan (Fig. 1).1 This site once stood at a crossroads where the ancient roads coming from the Dead Sea, the Wadi Sayl Haydan and the town of Madaba met. During the summers of 2011-2012, a small team of eight archaeologists, students, and volunteers along with eighteen Jordanian workers from the Beni-Hamida region of Jordan continued excavations2 at Khirbat ‘Ataruz under the direction of Chang-Ho Ji of La Sierra University (Fig. 2). This project was excavated with the cooperation of the Institute of Archaeology at Andrews University.3 1To reach the site one must drive approximately 13 km south from Madaba along the Kings Highway (J35). Turn right at the little town of Libb and continue approximately 12 km toward Machaerus. The site will be on a low hill on the left side of the highway. The small village of Jabal Hamidah is 2 km beyond the site. Latitude: 31 34’ 31’’; Longitude: 35 40’ 03’’. 2The authors would like to thank the volunteers and staff members who participated in the 2011-2012 excavations at Khirbat ‘Ataruz.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Edom in Judah: An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entanglement in the Negev During the Late Iron Age (8th–6th Centuries BCE) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/39t2f71m Author Danielson, Andrew Joel Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Edom in Judah: An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entanglement in the Negev During the Late Iron Age (8th–6th Centuries BCE) A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Andrew Joel Danielson 2020 © Copyright by Andrew Joel Danielson 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Edom in Judah: An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entanglement in the Negev During the Late Iron Age (8th–6th Centuries BCE) by Andrew Joel Danielson Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Aaron Alexander Burke, Chair Archaeological excavations in the northeastern Negev region of southern Judah identified significant amounts of “foreign” archaeological material culture in contexts dating to the late Iron Age (late eighth to early sixth century BCE). This iconic material culture consisted of highly identifiable ceramics, evidence of non-Yahwistic cult featuring the deity Qws, and non-Judahite inscriptions. Identified as associated with the kingdom of Edom to the east, this material culture assemblage was quickly interpreted to be the result of an Edomite “invasion,” understood as occurring during the late Judean monarchy (late seventh to early sixth centuries BCE) in tandem with Babylonian aggression and the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE, as was promoted by certain readings of the biblical text.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entangl
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Edom in Judah: An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entanglement in the Negev During the Late Iron Age (8th–6th Centuries BCE) A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Andrew Joel Danielson 2020 © Copyright by Andrew Joel Danielson 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Edom in Judah: An Archaeological Investigation of Identity, Interaction, and Social Entanglement in the Negev During the Late Iron Age (8th–6th Centuries BCE) by Andrew Joel Danielson Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Aaron Alexander Burke, Chair Archaeological excavations in the northeastern Negev region of southern Judah identified significant amounts of “foreign” archaeological material culture in contexts dating to the late Iron Age (late eighth to early sixth century BCE). This iconic material culture consisted of highly identifiable ceramics, evidence of non-Yahwistic cult featuring the deity Qws, and non-Judahite inscriptions. Identified as associated with the kingdom of Edom to the east, this material culture assemblage was quickly interpreted to be the result of an Edomite “invasion,” understood as occurring during the late Judean monarchy (late seventh to early sixth centuries BCE) in tandem with Babylonian aggression and the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE, as was promoted by certain readings of the biblical text. This study challenges the monocausal interpretation of an invasion, recognizing both the longevity of this material culture’s presence in the northeastern Negev, its frequent production ii within the northeastern Negev, and the contexts in which it was excavated that reveal a material culture footprint inconsistent with an invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ataroth and the Inscribed Altar: Who Won The
    Ataroth and the Inscribed Altar: Who Won the War Between Moab and Israel? https://www.thetorah.com/article/ataroth-and-the-inscribed-altar-who-won-the-war-between-moab-and-israel Ataroth is an obscure Transjordanian city, referenced only twice in the Bible. Nevertheless, due to modern archaeological discoveries, it has become a central piece of evidence for reconstructing the history of the Moabite rebellion against Israel and King Mesha’s expansion of the Moabite kingdom described in both 2 Kings and the Mesha Stele. Adam L. Bean and Christopher A. Rollston Chris Rollston examining the Khirbat Ataruz altar inscription. Photo Courtesy of C. Rollston ʿăṭārôt) appears only twice in the Torah and nowhere , ﬠֲ טָ ר וֹ ת) The Transjordanian city of Ataroth else in the Bible.[1] It would have remained little more than an obscure biblical toponym (place name) were it not for two modern archaeological discoveries that have made it a showcase example of the connection of biblical narrative to archaeological and epigraphic data.[2] Ataroth in the Torah Both references to the city in the Torah appear in Numbers 32, as part of the territory that the tribes of Gad and Reuben settle. Its first appearance is among the cities Gad and Reuben list, when they ask Moses for permission to settle in the region, due to its suitability for raising cattle: במדבר לב:ב וַיָּבֹאוּ בְ נֵי גָד וּבְ נֵי רְ אוּבֵ ן וַיֹּאמְ רוּ אֶ ל מֹשֶׁ ה וְאֶ ל אֶלְ ﬠָ זָר הַ כֹּהֵ ן וְאֶ ל נְשִׂ יאֵ י הָ ﬠֵדָ ה לֵ אמֹר.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 9/29/2019
    September 29th, 2019 Welcome to Covenant Baptist Church. We are a Reformed church committed to three things: • The Exaltation of God We desire that the people at Covenant truly understand who God is and His rightful place in their lives as their Lord and sovereign Savior. • The Edification of the Saints We consider it extremely important to cor- rectly teach the Bible, verse by verse, so we can properly have the Holy Spirit apply it to our lives. • The Evangelization of the Sinner We understand that God has given us the re- sponsibility to be stewards of the Gospel and that means sharing it exactly like God gave it to us with those who need Jesus. https://covenantbaptistsc.org Covenant Baptist Church Schedule Table of Contents Bible Education Hour (Systematic Theology) 1. Announcements and Book of the Month—pg. 2 ~ 9:30 A.M. 2. Events—pg. 3 Sunday Worship ~ 10:30 A.M. 3. Does Christ Want Us to Give Everything (article by Jeremiah Johnson)—pg. 4 Wednesday Prayer Service ~ 7:00 P.M. (We are not interested in traditional worship 4. Church News, Local and Global—pg. 8 or contemporary worship. We are only interested in true worship.) 5. Directions—pg. 12 ~ Order of Worship (September 29th, 2019) I Stand Amazed In the Presence, pg. 105 Prayer and Scripture Reading: 13:1-25 Upcoming cleaning volunteers: Deacon on-call list: Blessed Assurance, pg. 403 October 5: Shaffer September 29: Colonel Rogers How Great Thou Art, pg. 5 October 12: Crapps/McSween October 6: Burt Lanier October 19: Lucas/Bean October 13: James Campbell Message: The Promise of the Holy Spirit, Part Two October 26: Bristol October 20: Matt Watson —John 14:15-17 Closing Hymn: I Worship You, Almighty God (screen) 1 Announcements—September 29th, 2019 Book of the Month: Congratulations to Ethan & Grace Hammond, who joined their hands in marriage yesterday, All That Is In God September 28.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 ASOR Program Book.Pdf
    November 16–19 | San Antonio, Texas Welcome to ASOR’s 2016 Annual Meeting 2–5 History and Mission of ASOR 6–7 Meeting Highlights 7 Program-at-a-Glance 10–12 Schedule of Business Meetings, Receptions, and Events 13–15 Academic Program 18–45 Projects on Parade Poster Session 46–47 Contents Hotel and General Information 49 Members’ Meeting Agenda 50 of ASOR’s Legacy Circle 50 2016 Sponsors and Exhibitors 51–56 Ten Things To Do in San Antonio 58 Looking ahead to the 2017 Annual Meeting 59 Table Table Fiscal Year 2016 Honor Roll 60–61 Annual Fund Pledge Card 62 Excavation Grants and Fellowships Awarded 63 2015 Honors and Awards 65 ACOR Jordanian Travel Scholarships 66 2017 Annual Meeting Registration Form 67 2017 ASOR Membership Form 68 ASOR Journals 69 Institutional Members 72 ASOR Staff 73 ASOR Board of Trustees 74 ASOR Committees 75–77 Overseas Centers 78 Paper Abstracts 80–182 Poster Abstracts 182–190 Index of Sessions 191–193 Index of Presenters 194–198 Notes and Contacts 199–204 La Cantera Resort and Spa, Floor Plan 206–207 ISBN 978-0-89757-096-1 ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2016 | 1 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2016 Annual Meeting Welcome from ASOR President, Susan Ackerman Welcome to ASOR’s 2016 Annual Meeting! The Program Committee has once more done an incredible job, putting together a rich and vibrant program of sessions and posters, covering all the major regions of the Near East and wider Mediterranean from earliest times through the Islamic period. I am especially pleased that some of our newer sessions—for example, on the archaeology of the Kurdistan region of Iraq and on the archaeology of monasticism—continue to thrive, and I am also pleased that our program demonstrates more and more ASOR’s expanded geographical and cultural reach.
    [Show full text]
  • CNEA Newsletter Spring 2019
    La Sierra Digs Newsletter of the Center for Near Eastern Archaeology | HMS Richards Divinity School | La Sierra University | Vol. 7:2 Spring 2019 CNEA Associates Receive Archaeology Awards Douglas Clark Students, faculty, administrators, and volunteers at CNEA have Inaugurated this year at the La Sierra University Homecoming received several impressive awards over the past few months. Weekend, CNEA Archaeology Awards were given to three indi- These range from travel scholarships to recognition awards to viduals who have contributed to the growth and prosperity of research grants. The following students received these awards: archaeology at the university. These include: Jaime Bennett (MA student) – Foundation for Biblical Archae- Dr. Randal Wisbey – university president, long-time supporter, ology travel scholarship to attend the ASOR (American Schools site visitor, cheerleader of Oriental Research) annual meeting last November in Denver Dr. Audrey Shaffer – veteran of 44 excavation seasons and Betty Adams (MA student) – Pierre and Patricia Bikai month- long-time volunteer at CNEA long research fellowship to study more about cosmetic pal- ettes at the American Center of Oriental Research (ACOR) in Dr. Lawrence Geraty – pioneer archaeologist, beginning field- Amman, Jordan work in the 1960s, former president of La Sierra, and Associate Director of CNEA Nicole Castanon (MA student) – excavation grant from ASOR to help with expenses for participation in the CNEA excava- A Versacare Foundation grant of $10,000 was awarded to tions this summer at the Baluʿa Regional Archaeological Proj- co-directors Kent Bramlett, Monique Vincent, and Friedbert ect (BRAP) Ninow for the Baluʿa Regional Archaeological Project (BRAP) excavations at Khirbat al-Baluʿa this summer in Jordan.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Abstracts
    PAPER ABSTRACTS Plenary Address Eric H. Cline (The George Washington University), “Dirt, Digging, Dreams, and Drama: Why Presenting Proper Archaeology to the Public is Crucial for the Future of Our Field” We seem to have forgotten that previous generations of Near Eastern archaeologists knew full well the need to bring their work before the eyes of the general public; think especially of V. Gordon Childe, Sir Leonard Woolley, Gertrude Bell, James Henry Breasted, Yigael Yadin, Dame Kathleen Kenyon, and a whole host of others who lectured widely and wrote prolifically. Breasted even created a movie on the exploits of the Oriental Institute, which debuted at Carnegie Hall and then played around the country in the 1930s. The public was hungry for accurate information back then and is still hungry for it today. And yet, with a few exceptions, we have lost sight of this, sacrificed to the goal of achieving tenure and other perceived institutional norms, and have left it to others to tell our stories for us, not always to our satisfaction. I believe that it is time for us all— not just a few, but as many as possible—to once again begin telling our own stories about our findings and presenting our archaeological work in ways that make it relevant, interesting, and engaging to a broader audience. We need to deliver our findings and our thoughts about the ancient world in a way that will not only attract but excite our audiences. Our livelihoods, and the future of the field, depend upon it, for this is true not only for our lectures and writings for the general public but also in our classrooms.
    [Show full text]