DOCSLIB.ORG

Paper Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paper Abstracts PAPER ABSTRACTS Plenary Address Eric H. Cline (The George Washington University), “Dirt, Digging, Dreams, and Drama: Why Presenting Proper Archaeology to the Public is Crucial for the Future of Our Field” We seem to have forgotten that previous generations of Near Eastern archaeologists knew full well the need to bring their work before the eyes of the general public; think especially of V. Gordon Childe, Sir Leonard Woolley, Gertrude Bell, James Henry Breasted, Yigael Yadin, Dame Kathleen Kenyon, and a whole host of others who lectured widely and wrote prolifically. Breasted even created a movie on the exploits of the Oriental Institute, which debuted at Carnegie Hall and then played around the country in the 1930s. The public was hungry for accurate information back then and is still hungry for it today. And yet, with a few exceptions, we have lost sight of this, sacrificed to the goal of achieving tenure and other perceived institutional norms, and have left it to others to tell our stories for us, not always to our satisfaction. I believe that it is time for us all— not just a few, but as many as possible—to once again begin telling our own stories about our findings and presenting our archaeological work in ways that make it relevant, interesting, and engaging to a broader audience. We need to deliver our findings and our thoughts about the ancient world in a way that will not only attract but excite our audiences. Our livelihoods, and the future of the field, depend upon it, for this is true not only for our lectures and writings for the general public but also in our classrooms. If we are unable to successfully engage our own students, and to show them that good research goes hand in hand with good teaching, lecturing, and writing, with each informing and improving the others, we will fail to cultivate the next generation of archaeologists. 1A. Transitions, Urbanism, and Collapse in the Bronze Age: Presentations in Honor of Suzanne Richard CHAIRS: William G. Dever (University of Arizona) and Jesse Long (Lubbock Christian University) Joe D. Seger (Mississippi State University), “The Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant: A View from Tell Halif” Beginning in the 1970s, the Lahav Research Project (LRP) conducted extensive research at and in the environs of Tell Halif, near Kibbutz Lahav in southern Israel. Excavations on the tell and on the adjacent eastern terrace exposed well-stratified evidence of Late Chalcolithic to EB I and subsequent EB III occupations. The Halif Terrace remains included four well-defined strata (XIX–XVI) and 13 contiguous phases of Chalcolithic and EB I settlement. These provide clear evidence of association with other regional emporia in a trading network with Pre- and Early Dynastic Egyptians. After a hiatus during EB II, when regional occupations migrated to the major centers at Arad and Yarmut, Halif recovered in the EB III, becoming a large, well-fortified city flourishing along with regional sites such as Tell el-Hesi and Yarmut. This first EB III settlement (EB IIIA, Stratum XV) suffered massive destruction. Nonetheless, occupation at Halif endured through three further stages of development (Strata XIV–XII). These were unfortified, open enclaves sustained by local agriculture and a still-thriving flint knapping industry. Stratum XII occupation ended in the 23rd century B.C.E., perhaps at the hand of General Uni in his campaigns during the Egyptian VIth Dynasty. Halif’s progressive decline is paradigmatic of the ruralization of late EB III cultures in southern Palestine as contacts with Egypt flagged, and local subsistence became increasingly untenable. Stanley Klassen (University of Toronto) and Timothy P. Harrison (University of Toronto), “The Madaba Settlement Cluster and the Nature of Early Bronze Age Urbanism in the Central Highlands of Jordan” Numerous studies have attempted to define the evolution and nature of Early Bronze Age urbanism in the southern Levant, ranging from cultural-historical and linear evolutionary approaches to more recent formulations that have invoked concepts of heterarchy and corporate village identity. Site-specific case studies, meanwhile, have emphasized their “individual histories,” highlighting the uniqueness of their urban development, evident in town planning, potential “palatial” buildings, and the inference of centralized craft production and the distribution of goods, or lack thereof. While pan-Early Bronze Age models of hierarchical systems based on scale or size are still advocated by some, an increasing number of scholars now argue that the rise and decline of settlement in the southern Levant was based on rural rather than urban development, demonstrating that the level of integration of cities, towns, and rural communities is a better indicator of the level of complexity and “urbanization” than scale or size. The Madaba settlement cluster, situated in the highlands of central Jordan, offers a unique opportunity to test integration at the regional level. This paper will present the results of a holistic analysis of Early Bronze Age pottery from sites within the Madaba settlement cluster and will emphasize the distributed organizational structure of this regional community, as reflected in this craft industry. Steve Falconer (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) and Pat Fall (University of North Carolina at Charlotte), “EB IV Settlement, Chronology, and Society along the Jordan Rift” Bayesian modeling of calibrated 14C ages from Khirbat Iskandar, Bab edh-Dhra‘, and Tell Abu en-Ni‘aj bolsters an emerging high chronology for the southern Levantine Early Bronze Age. The work of Suzanne Richard, especially through the excavation of Khirbat Iskandar, highlights the importance of sedentary settlements amid the mobile pastoralism normally emphasized for EB IV society. Comparative analysis of radiocarbon dates from Khirbat Iskandar and Bab edh-Dhra‘ permits reexamination of their stratigraphic and chronological correlations. Integration of these results with a Bayesian model of 14C ages from Tell Abu en-Ni‘aj provides a coordinated overview of chronological relationships among these important sedentary communities and through the full course of a newly lengthened EB IV. Jointly, the temporal insights from these settlements contribute to a potential uncoupling of EB IV from the Egyptian First Intermediate period, both chronologically and interpretively, and a revised orientation toward non-urban settlement as a hallmark of Early Bronze Age society. Andrea Polcaro (University of Perugia) and Marta D’Andrea (Sapienza Università di Roma), “Urbanism, Collapse, and Transitions: Taking the View from Transjordan in the Early Bronze Age” Early urbanism and “rural complexity” have been crucial topics in Suzanne Richard’s research on the southern Levantine Early Bronze Age. Therefore, reconnecting to this line of research, Jabal al-Mutawwaq, in the Middle Wadi az-Zarqa Valley, and Khirbat Iskandar, along the Wadi al-Wala, will be used as key sites to reanalyze, respectively, EB I–II and EB III–IV. First of all, the settlement sites and the necropolis at Jabal al-Mutawwaq will be presented to review the state-of-the-art of EB I, considered not just as a transitional period but, rather, as a formative stage in the developmental trajectory of the southern Levant toward urbanization. In fact, recent discoveries at Jebel al-Mutawwaq suggest that the site represents a case study to re-investigate different stages of transformation and evolution of the settlement model from villages in EB I to walled settlements in EB II–II. Subsequently, Khirbat Iskandar will be used as a case study to reappraise the question of early urbanization in Jordan during EB II–III, as well as of how it came to an end and transitioned to the non-urban EB IV period. The question of continuity and discontinuity between EB III and IV and between EB IV and the Middle Bronze Age will be discussed, too, considering archaeological correlates and chronological issues. In this way, the paper aims to reconsider Early Bronze Age urbanism in Transjordan taking a long durée perspective from the mid-fourth to the end of the third millennia B.C.E. Shlomit Bechar (University of Haifa), “The Architectural Fabric of Hazor’s Lower City in the Middle and Late Bronze Ages” The transition between the Middle and Late Bronze Age is the first transition in archaeological periods which is based on historical events. The traditional date is attributed to the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt and the beginning of the New Kingdom (approximately the mid-16th century B.C.E.). Recently, the date of this transition has been challenged, with the suggestion that the date should be later and ascribed to the conquest of Canaan by Thutmosis III (approximately the first half of the 15th century B.C.E.). This paper will present the changes in the built environment of the lower city of Hazor during the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. It will show that major changes occurred between Stratum II, dated to LB I, and Stratum IB, dated to LB IIA. During the Middle Bronze Age and LB I, most of the excavated areas in the lower city comprised public and monumental buildings, whereas in LB IIA the city was mainly occupied by domestic structures. The historical and social implications of these observations will be discussed as well as the question of the identity of the inhabitants of the lower city of Hazor. 1B. Yerushalayim, Al Quds, Jerusalem: Recent Developments and Dilemmas in Archaeological and Historical Studies from the Bronze Age to Medieval Periods I CHAIR: Yuval Gadot (Tel Aviv University) Joe Uziel (Israel Antiquities Authority), “Rethinking Identity in the Iron Age Southern Levant: A View from Jerusalem” The Iron Age in the southern Levant is often thought of as the particular instance in which the cultural and political fluidity so commonly discussed in earlier periods is largely replaced by well-defined entities that occupy particular geographic regions, each developing its own particular paradigm of political structure, cultic practice, material culture, and more.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Century American Gilded Picture Frames Hugh Glover
    Tech Notes, Fall 2006 Care and use of 19th-century American gilded picture frames Hugh Glover icture frames are a component of most art collections and are subject to wear and tear in their functional role surrounding paint- P ings. Damage to frames occurs during exhibition, storage, and travel, and is caused by handling, hanging processes, adverse environments, neglect, and irreversible restorations. Picture frames are maintained by a variety of preservation specialist and their preservation interests have only rarely been addressed. The following is Section 4 of a larger paper, “A Description of 19th- Century American Gilded Picture Frames and an Outline of their Modern Use and Conservation,” presented in June to the Wooden Artifact Group at the 2006 annual meeting of AIC in Providence, Rhode Island. This sec- tion addresses general preservation, handling and preparation of frames for exhibition. Environment Gilded wood objects are ultra sensitive to environmental conditions and are probably more sensitive than most paintings. Gilded wood in adverse climates experiences detachment and loss of gilding/or- nament, while the accumulation of grime leads to surface darkening and cleaning campaigns that may well cause damage. The protected bright gilding that survives on shadow boxed frames of the second half-century illustrates how more exposed gilding has now been altered by grime, abrasion, and staining from moisture and grease during handling. Handling All gilded objects should be handled with non-marring gloves to avoid abrasions and staining, and even paper towels or cotton cloth will suffice. In practice, however, gilded frames are still handled with bare hands as the frame is considered a safe means of handling the artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Piety, Practice, and Politics: Agency and Ritual in the Late Bronze Age Southern Levant Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8vx8j9v5 Author DePietro, Dana Douglas Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Piety, Practice, and Politics: Ritual and Agency in the Late Bronze Age Southern Levant By Dana Douglas DePietro A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Marian Feldman, Chair Professor Benjamin Porter Professor Aaron Brody Professor Margaret Conkey Spring 2012 © 2012- Dana Douglas DePietro All rights reserved. Abstract Piety, Practice, and Politics: Ritual and Agency in the Late Bronze Southern Levant by Dana Douglas DePietro Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Marian Feldman, Chair Striking changes in the archaeological record of the southern Levant during the final years of the Late Bronze Age have long fascinated scholars interested in the region and period. Attempts to explain the emergence of new forms of Canaanite material culture have typically cited external factors such as Egyptian political domination as the driving force behind culture change, relying on theoretical models of acculturation, elite-emulation and center-periphery theory. While these approaches can be useful in explaining some dimensions of culture-contact, they are limited by their assumption of a unidirectional flow of power and influence from dominant core societies to passive peripheries.
    [Show full text]
  • From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean
    THE FUTURE OF THE PAST: From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean Editors Konstantinos Chalikias, Maggie Beeler, Ariel Pearce, and Steve Renette http://futureofthepast.wix.com/culturalheritage HERITAGE, CONSERVATION & ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA Contents 1. The Future of the Past: From Amphipolis to Mosul, New Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Eastern Mediterranean .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Konstantinos Chalikias, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Maggie Beeler, Bryn Mawr College, Ariel Pearce, Temple University, and Steve Renette, University of Pennsylvania 2. Go, Do Good! Responsibility and the Future of Cultural Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 21st Century ........... 5 Morag M. Kersel, DePaul University 3. Contested Antiquities, Contested Histories: The City of David as an Example ........................................................................... 11 Rannfrid I. Thelle, Wichita State University 4. Cultural Racketeering in Egypt—Predicting Patterns in Illicit Activity: Quantitative Tools of the 21st-Century Archaeologist .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Katie A. Paul, The Antiquities Coalition
    [Show full text]
  • ANTY 513.01: Seminar in Bioarchaeology and Skeletal Biology
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Syllabi Course Syllabi Spring 1-2016 ANTY 513.01: Seminar in Bioarchaeology and Skeletal Biology Corey Ragsdale University of Montana, Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ragsdale, Corey, "ANTY 513.01: Seminar in Bioarchaeology and Skeletal Biology" (2016). Syllabi. 4657. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/4657 This Syllabus is brought to you for free and open access by the Course Syllabi at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anthropology 513 Bioarchaeology Seminar Instructor: Dr. Corey Ragsdale Office: Social Science 217 Email: [email protected] Office hours: TR 2:00 to 3:30 Course Description Bioarchaeology allows us to ‘people’ the past. To do this, bioarchaeologists follow two general rules of thumb. First, they contextualize human remains in physical space, cultural milieu, and pre-historic time. That is, skeletonized and mummified bodies are never examined without also considering their associated archaeological materials. Second, bioarchaeologists regard ancient bodies as bio-cultural phenomena. Human biology is impacted directly by culture, and vice versa. With these two ideas in hand, we will explore bioarchaeology’s history, development, major topical concerns, and debates. We will also engage critically with categories and assumptions about race, sex/gender, age, ethnicity, disease and disability, violence, and body parts. To conclude the semester, we will reflect upon bioarchaeology’s relevance in contemporary politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Archaeology: a Review Author(S): Patrick E
    Science in Archaeology: A Review Author(s): Patrick E. McGovern, Thomas L. Sever, J. Wilson Myers, Eleanor Emlen Myers, Bruce Bevan, Naomi F. Miller, S. Bottema, Hitomi Hongo, Richard H. Meadow, Peter Ian Kuniholm, S. G. E. Bowman, M. N. Leese, R. E. M. Hedges, Frederick R. Matson, Ian C. Freestone, Sarah J. Vaughan, Julian Henderson, Pamela B. Vandiver, Charles S. Tumosa, Curt W. Beck, Patricia Smith, A. M. Child, A. M. Pollard, Ingolf Thuesen, Catherine Sease Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 79-142 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/506880 Accessed: 16/07/2009 14:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aia. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacrificing Truth: Archaeology and the Myth of Masada
    Sacrificing Truth: Archaeology and The Myth of Masada The Bible and Interpretation http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/ben-yehuda_masada.shtml Mid-60's Masada excavations forged a past through falsified evidence and concealed facts. By: Nachman Ben-Yehuda (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, an imprint of Prometheus Books) © 2002 Chapter One Introduction: The Puzzle How do we perceive our culture? How do we understand ourselves as beings in need of meaning? We are socialized into and live in complex cultures from which we extract the very essence of our identity, but at the same time we also construct these cultures. How is this process accomplished? What is the nature of those cultural processes that provide us with symbolic meaning and vitalize our perception of ourselves within our self-structured and regulated social orders? This book is addressed to these issues. One interesting way of exploring cultures is to examine some of the myriad contrasts that characteristically make up cultures. These contrasts set boundaries, which in turn define the variety of the symbolic-moral universes of which complex cultures are made. In turn, these symbolic-moral universes give rise to and support both personal and collective identities. There are many such contrasts, some more profound than others. There are physical contrasts, such as black/white, day/night, sea/land, mountain/valley, and there are socially and morally constructed contrasts, such as good/bad, right/wrong, justice/injustice, trust/betrayal. The contrast we shall focus on in this book is a major and significant one: between truth and falsehood. This contrast cuts across many symbolic-moral universes because it touches a quality to which we attach central importance--that between the genuine and the spurious.
    [Show full text]
  • New Early Eighth-Century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 1992 New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations Michael Gerald Hasel Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Hasel, Michael Gerald, "New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations" (1992). Master's Theses. 41. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Mezmaiskaya"
    Eurasian Prehistory, 5 (1) : 131- 136. GETTING BACK TO BASICS: A RESPONSE TO OTTE "COMMENTS ON MEZMAISKAYA" Lubov Golovanova, Vladimir Doronichev and Naomi Cleghorn Marcel Otte recently argued (In "Comments Jar to the Ahmarian tradition, and particularly the on Mezmaiskaya, North Caucasus", Eurasian lithic assemblages from Abu Noshra and the La­ Prehistory, this issue) that the Early Upper Paleo­ gaman, dating between 30 and 35 ky BP (Gilead, lithic (EUP) at Mezmaiskaya Cave can be defined 1991 ). This preliminary conclusion is based on as Aurignacian (versus Golovanova et al., 2006). the prevalence of micro-laminar (bladelet) debi­ This raises an old methodological problem con­ tage, a high percentage of tools made on bladelets cerning the correct use of scientific terms and the (compared with 45 .7 percent at Lagama), and a definition of the Aurignacian. Lithic definitions rather low representation (about 20 percent) of such as Aurignacian and Gravettian, which were endscrapers and burins. It is important to note that ori ginally based on specific materials, have been only the later Ahmarian assemblages provided a rather more loosely applied to assemblages dis­ basis for this comparison. Moreover, despite tant in time and space. We believe that the wider many similarities, the EUP industry from Layer application of these original terms not only sim­ 1C at Mezmaiskaya is not identical to the Ahmar­ plifies them by a subjective reduction of their pri­ ian. mary determining attributes, but also confuses our Ongoing excavations of EUP levels in Mez­ understanding of cultural processes within and maiskaya Cave now permit a more accurate com­ between various regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa
    Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Introduction 20 The African archeological record of 43-28 ka as a comparison 21 A - The Aurignacian has no direct equivalent in Africa 21 B - Archaic hominins persist in Africa through much of the Late Pleistocene 24 C - High modification symbolic artifacts in Africa and Eurasia 24 Conclusions 26 Acknowledgements 26 References cited 27 To cite this article Tryon C. A. , 2015 - The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 19-33. http://www.palethnologie.org 19 P@lethnology | 2015 | 19-33 Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Abstract The Aurignacian technocomplex in Eurasia, dated to ~43-28 ka, has no direct archeological taxonomic equivalent in Africa during the same time interval, which may reflect differences in inter-group communication or differences in archeological definitions currently in use. Extinct hominin taxa are present in both Eurasia and Africa during this interval, but the African archeological record has played little role in discussions of the demographic expansion of Homo sapiens, unlike the Aurignacian. Sites in Eurasia and Africa by 42 ka show the earliest examples of personal ornaments that result from extensive modification of raw materials, a greater investment of time that may reflect increased their use in increasingly diverse and complex social networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Seenon the Israel Scene from Masada to Kibbutz Ketura
    The Jewish National Edition Post &Opinion Presenting a broad spectrum of Jewish News and Opinions since 1935. Volume 84, Number 2 • March 7, 2018 • 20 Adar 5778 www.jewishpostopinion.com • https://go.usa.gov/xn7ay Cover Art by Carolyn Frankel (see About the Cover on p. 2) 2 The Jewish Post & Opinion – NAT March 7, 2018 About the Cover Seen on the Be Like Miriam Israel Scene By Carolyn Frankel This art depicting Miriam from the BY SYBIL KAPLAN Passover story is from the book, Be From Masada to Like Rachel: Lessons of Character from Kibbutz Ketura Women of the Bible written and beau- Masada is about two hours from Methuselah in the Arava Institute research tifully illustrated by Kibbutz Ketura but its connections are a park on Kibbutz Ketura. Photo by Dr. Stolowey Carolyn Frankel. lot closer. London-born Dr. Sarah Sallon, Frankel, a writer Director of the Louis Borick Natural University of Zurich, Switzerland for radio and artist, was an Medicine Research Center at the carbon dating.They were also tested to see elementary school Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Karem, if they were anti-bacterial, anti-viral, educator teaching through the arts for 38 Jerusalem is friends with California-born anti-cancer, anti-fungal, anti-malaria, years in the Ohio public schools. She botanist of the Arava Institute for anti-oxidant, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and wrote this book to teach children not only Environmental Studies at Kibbutz Ketura, immune regulatory. about the Matriarchs of the Bible but as a Dr. Elaine Solowey. The date palm was one of the best vehicle to teach good character.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 5 Number 2 2010/2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson Cathy L. Draeger-Williams Cathy A. Carson Wade T. Tharp Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy A. Carson, Records Check Coordinator Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. Mission Statement: The Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology promotes the conservation of Indiana’s cultural resources through public education efforts, financial incentives including several grant and tax credit programs, and the administration of state and federally mandated legislation. 2 For further information contact: Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology 402 W. Washington Street, Room W274 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2739 Phone: 317/232-1646 Email: [email protected] www.IN.gov/dnr/historic 2010/2011 3 Indiana Archaeology Volume 5 Number 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors of articles were responsible for ensuring that proper permission for the use of any images in their articles was obtained.
    [Show full text]