DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 ASOR Program Book.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 ASOR Program Book.Pdf November 16–19 | San Antonio, Texas Welcome to ASOR’s 2016 Annual Meeting 2–5 History and Mission of ASOR 6–7 Meeting Highlights 7 Program-at-a-Glance 10–12 Schedule of Business Meetings, Receptions, and Events 13–15 Academic Program 18–45 Projects on Parade Poster Session 46–47 Contents Hotel and General Information 49 Members’ Meeting Agenda 50 of ASOR’s Legacy Circle 50 2016 Sponsors and Exhibitors 51–56 Ten Things To Do in San Antonio 58 Looking ahead to the 2017 Annual Meeting 59 Table Table Fiscal Year 2016 Honor Roll 60–61 Annual Fund Pledge Card 62 Excavation Grants and Fellowships Awarded 63 2015 Honors and Awards 65 ACOR Jordanian Travel Scholarships 66 2017 Annual Meeting Registration Form 67 2017 ASOR Membership Form 68 ASOR Journals 69 Institutional Members 72 ASOR Staff 73 ASOR Board of Trustees 74 ASOR Committees 75–77 Overseas Centers 78 Paper Abstracts 80–182 Poster Abstracts 182–190 Index of Sessions 191–193 Index of Presenters 194–198 Notes and Contacts 199–204 La Cantera Resort and Spa, Floor Plan 206–207 ISBN 978-0-89757-096-1 ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2016 | 1 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2016 Annual Meeting Welcome from ASOR President, Susan Ackerman Welcome to ASOR’s 2016 Annual Meeting! The Program Committee has once more done an incredible job, putting together a rich and vibrant program of sessions and posters, covering all the major regions of the Near East and wider Mediterranean from earliest times through the Islamic period. I am especially pleased that some of our newer sessions—for example, on the archaeology of the Kurdistan region of Iraq and on the archaeology of monasticism—continue to thrive, and I am also pleased that our program demonstrates more and more ASOR’s expanded geographical and cultural reach. Geographically, we will look west in the papers featured in the session “Sicily and the Levant”; to the east in the session on “New Research in Pre-Islamic Central Asia”; to the north in the session on “Archaeology of the Black Sea and the Caucasus,” and south in papers on “Archaeology of Arabia.” Chronologically, ASOR continues to expand its offerings in medieval Islamic archaeology, with a session, for example, on the “Archaeology of the Crusaders and their Neighbors.” The program in addition features a wealth of sessions on more thematic topics: for example, “Glass in the Ancient Near East,” “Material Culture and Identities in the Eastern Mediterranean,” “The Archaeology of Feasting and Foodways,” “Senses and Sensibility in the Near East,” “Materiality of Communication,” and “Landscapes of Settlement in the Ancient Near East.” Several sessions also focus on specific sites—both recent discoveries and insights from sites such as Lachish and Sepphoris, and retrospective looks at the many decades of excavations at sites like Tel Halif and Tel Dan. A somewhat similar session will focus on reexamining the materials from the excavations at Antioch eighty years ago. Other sessions, such as the session on “Archaeologists Engaging Global Challenges,” look forward, and, as in previous years, many of these sessions explore the promises of new technologies: GIS and remote sensing, cyber-archaeology, the use of modern photographic and digital technologies to enhance our understanding of ancient inscriptions, and isotopic investigations of ancient diet and mobility. Two sessions on “Career Options for ASOR Members” also address the commitment ASOR made in its recently adopted Strategic Plan for 2016–2020 to help our members—especially our members who are at the beginnings of their careers—negotiate the challenges of the rapidly changing environment of the academy. On Wednesday night, our program will feature, as always, our plenary address, to be delivered this year by Sarah Parcak, Associate Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Laboratory for Global Observation at the University of Alabama, Birmingham. Dr. Parcak is a National Geographic Society Archaeology Fellow, Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, and a 2013 TED Senior Fellow. In 2016, she won the $1 million TED Prize, with which she intends to develop “an online interactive citizen science platform” that will allow any computer user—after some basic training—to use satellite images to search for and monitor the status of archaeological sites. This project, and Dr. Parcak’s related work in space archaeology, will be the subject of her plenary address, “Toward a 21st Century Archaeology of the Near East: Technology, Big Data, and Citizen Science.” Overall, our 2016 Annual Meeting promises to be packed with the best ASOR scholars have to offer. I look forward to seeing you all in San Antonio! Susan Ackerman ASOR President 2 | ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2016 November 16–19 | San Antonio, Texas Welcome from the Executive Director, Andrew Vaughn Welcome to our Annual Meeting in San Antonio! We are pleased to host ASOR’s 2016 Annual Meeting in a venue that “was built before Texas was Texas or the United States were united.” A vibrant city in the heart of southwestern U.S., San Antonio dates back to five missions that were founded in the 18th century, and these missions are now identified as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Our conference hotel is an AAA Four Diamond Resort located on the edge of the Texas Hill Country, an area with storybook farms and ranches dotting the countryside. For those of us who live in colder climates, I am pleased that the entire area is known for its year-round mild climate. I’m confident that this will be one of our best venues ever. With Thanksgiving nearly upon us, there are so many individuals to whom thanks are due for giving their time to make this extraordinary program possible. This ambitious and wide-ranging meeting was overseen by one hard-working and talented committee in particular—the Annual Meeting Program Committee, led by co-chairs Geoff Emberling and Danielle Fatkin. Geoff and Danielle continue to do stellar work in their third year as co-chairs. These co-chairs, and the Program Committee members with whom they have worked, are dedicated, diligent, enthusiastic, and committed to putting together an exciting educational program of more than 450 papers and poster presentations! A full listing of all committees can be found on the ASOR Committees pages of this program book. Many thanks are also due to the session chairs and presenters who will bring the program to life. I wish to thank several groups in particular for their generous financial support of receptions at this Annual Meeting. The Foundation for Biblical Archaeology and its director, Sheila Bishop, provided crucial financial support for student scholarships. The American Institute of Iranian Studies awarded ASOR a generous grant to provide funding for two scholars from Iran to particpate in the meeting. In addition, I would like to thank all of our exhibitors and encourage you to stop by and visit the displays. We would like to give our special thanks to this year’s Annual Meeting sponsors, ISD (Platinum), Eisenbrauns (Gold), and Brill (Bronze). Last, but not least, I would like to extend special thanks and recognition to the ASOR staff. Their hard work and dedication throughout the year makes our Annual Meeting possible. Please mark your calendars for our 2017 Annual Meeting, which will be held at the Westin Boston Waterfront in the Seaport District of Boston, MA from November 15–18, 2017. Please visit the meeting website at www.asor.org/am/index. html for details. We once again anticipate a record attendance and full hotel, so I encourage you to make your reservations early. Please let me, or any member of the ASOR staff, know if there is anything we can do to make your experience in San Antonio a pleasant and rewarding one. I hope you enjoy this year’s Annual Meeting. Andrew G. Vaughn ASOR Executive Director ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2016 | 3 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2016 Annual Meeting Welcome from the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Richard Coffman Bienvenido. Welcome to San Antonio, the seventh largest city in the United States. As a native Texan, I am proud to welcome you to the Lone Star State for this year’s Annual Meeting. San Antonio is one of America’s truly unique cities. From the Alamo to the Riverwalk to the museums to the restaurants to the surrounding Texas hill country, San Antonio provides an embarrassment of historic, culinary, and cultural riches. Speaking of an embarrassment of cultural riches, we have them right here at the La Cantera Resort. This year, we once again had a record number of abstracts submitted for consideration—which means the schedule is chock full of presentations by scores of far-flung archaeologists, biblical and Islamic scholars, anthropologists, historians, conservators/curators, and other interdisciplinary specialists working in the Near Eastern and Mediterranean regions. They have discovered a lot of new stuff since we last convened, and are champing at the bit to tell us what they found and why it is important. But there is also business to conduct. And a new strategic plan to implement. And a new logo and website to unveil. And cultural heritage to protect. While we come together to learn and reconnect, we also come together to review from where we have come, and chart our path forward. This is an exciting and forward thinking time to be an ASOR member. The good news is that ASOR is growing, our finances are rock solid, the Annual Meeting continues its upward trajectory—in terms of quality, quantity, and prestige—and the fellowships we fund are increasing in number and amount. None of this, of course, is possible without your time and your talents.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch
    1 The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context *See page 4 for citation. Julian Hirsch 2 Acknowledgements In some ways the groundwork for my thesis and work on the ONESC Initiative began more than five years ago in a kitchen in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. I was meeting Dr. Elizabeth Bloch Smith for the first time and could scarcely have imagined that our meeting would lead to my participation in an archaeological excavation in Israel that summer. After my first excavation, I was hooked. The spring before I came to Oberlin was filled with weekly meetings, readings, and discussions with Liz. I learned so much in that time and appreciate her continued guidance and support. If Liz was responsible for exposing me to just how fascinating the archaeology of the southern Levant was, Dr. Jeffrey Blakely was the person who helped me find the path where I could follow my passion at Oberlin. I still have my notes from the first day of the January 2017 Winter Term. I was amazed by everything Jeff knew about the history of biblical archaeology at the college and the history of the collection. If anything inspired me throughout my work, it was hearing vivid stories from Jeff about sitting in Harry Thomas Frank’s classroom learning about archaeology. Jeff has truly been my partner at every step of the way. I’ve consulted him for advice numerous times. Jeff kindly provided invaluable suggestions that only a true veteran of the field could offer. To give credit to Jeff in two more areas, Jeff certainly inspired my interest in the history of biblical archaeology and during the Winter Term in 2017 assigned me to work on the Bab edh-Dhra’ collection of Early Bronze Age tomb pots.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Citadel of Messina. Hypothesis of Architectural
    Defensive Architecture of the Mediterranean. XV to XVIII centuries / Vol II / Rodríguez-Navarro (Ed.) © 2015 Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/FORTMED2015.2015. 1716 The Royal Citadel of Messina. Hypothesis of architectural restoration for the conservation and use Fabrizio Armaleoa, Marco Bonnab, Maria Grazia Isabel Brunoc, Sebastiano Buccad, Valentina Cutropiae, Nicola Faziof, Luigi Feliceg, Federica Gullettah, Vittorio Mondii, Elena Morabitol, Carmelo Rizzom aESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected],bESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], cESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], dESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], eESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], fESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], g ESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], hESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], iESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], lESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected], mESEMeP, Messina, Italy, [email protected] Abstract The hypothesis of architectural restoration wants to ensure the conservation and the use of the Royal Citadel through a conscious reinterpretation of the work and a cautious operation of image reintegration. The Royal Citadel of Messina, wanted by the King of Spain Charles II of Habsburg, was designed and built, at the end of the XVII century, by the military engineer Carlos de Grunenbergh. It is a "start fort" located at the entrance of its natural Sickle port, that is a strategic place for controlling the Strait of Messina, the port and especially the people living here. The project is neither retrospective or imitative of the past forms, nor free from the constraints and guidelines resulting from the historical-critical understanding, but conducted with conceptual rigor and with the specific aim of transmitting the monument to the future in the best possible conditions, even with the assignment of a new function.
    [Show full text]
  • New Early Eighth-Century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 1992 New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations Michael Gerald Hasel Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Hasel, Michael Gerald, "New Early Eighth-century B.C. Earthquake Evidence at Tel Gezer: Archaeological, Geological, and Literary Indications and Correlations" (1992). Master's Theses. 41. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VICTORY at AI Joshua 8:1-29 in Joshua 8, God Gives the Children Of
    THE VICTORY AT AI Though the primary cause of defeat the first time around was sin...a Joshua 8:1-29 secondary cause was underestimating the enemy (Joshua 7:3-4). In Joshua 8, God gives the children of Israel a second chance, this time I have given into your hand the king of Ai, his people, his city, to do things His way in the taking of the city of Ai. The momentum and his land (vs. 1b)...The defeat of Ai has been assured. God Israel had achieved by the miraculous crossing of the Jordan and the promised to turn the place of defeat into a place of victory. supernatural victory over Jericho was stopped by their defeat at Ai. You shall take only its spoil and its cattle as plunder for your- But one must always remember that Israel was defeated...not because selves (vs. 2b)...Before the actual battle plan was revealed to Joshua they were out manned...they were defeated because of sin. As a result he was told that the spoil of Ai, along with its livestock, could be of their defeat, despair permeated, not only among all those in the camp, taken. Jericho had been placed under the ban...Ai was not. but also within the heart of Joshua (Joshua 7:5). What an irony. If only Achan hadn’t been so greedy and selfish and Now with Achan’s sin judged, God’s favor toward Israel was restored had obeyed God...and had just waited on God...he would have had (Galatians 6:1) and He reassured Joshua that He had not forsaken him all his heart would have desired...and he would have had God’s or His people.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropolitics and Issue-Linkage Along the Orontes River Basin:… 105 Realised in the Context of the Political Rapprochement in the 2000S, Has Also Ended (Daoudy 2013)
    Int Environ Agreements (2020) 20:103–121 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09462-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Hydropolitics and issue‑linkage along the Orontes River Basin: an analysis of the Lebanon–Syria and Syria–Turkey hydropolitical relations Ahmet Conker1 · Hussam Hussein2,3 Published online: 13 December 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The Orontes River Basin is among the least researched transboundary water basins in the Middle East. The few studies on the Orontes have two main theoretical and empirical shortcomings. First, there is a lack of critical hydropolitics studies on this river. Second, those studies focus on either the Turkish–Syrian or Lebanese–Syria relations rather than analysing the case in a holistic way. Gathering both primary (international agreements, government documents, political statements and media outlets) and secondary sources, this paper seeks to answer how could Syria, as the basin hydro-hegemon, impose its control on the basin? This study argues that the lack of trilateral initiatives, which is also refected in academic studies, is primarily due to asymmetrical power dynamics. Accordingly, Syria played a dual-game by excluding each riparian, Turkey and Lebanon, and it dealt with the issue at the bilateral interaction. Syria has used its political infuence to maintain water control vis-à-vis Lebanon, while it has used non-cooperation with Turkey to exclude Tur- key from decision-making processes. The paper also argues that the historical background and the political context have strongly informed Syria’s water policy. Finally, given the recent regional political developments, the paper fnds that Syria’s power grip on the Orontes Basin slowly fades away because of the changes in the broader political context.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Journey… October 19, 2021, Tuesday: USA – Tel Aviv, Israel Depart Our Home City to Tel Aviv
    Why this Pilgrimage to the Holy Land? But to go on a pilgrimage in the Holy Land means setting off and turning the physical journey into a “path of the soul”. Walking on this land with the heart, soul and mind for an encounter: of conversion, of devotion, of listening, with the Eucharist, and with Christ in brothers. John Paul II expressed this in very moving words: “How many memories and images and how much passion and great mystery surround the word Jerusalem! For us as Christians, it represents the geographical point of union between God and men, between eternity and history.” Our Journey… October 19, 2021, Tuesday: USA – Tel Aviv, Israel Depart our home city to Tel Aviv. (In-flight meals) October 20, Wednesday: Arrival to Holy Land and Nahsholim Seaside Resort Arrive in the Holy Land and transfer through the Plain of Sharon and the western coastal cities of Israel to the site of the ancient port city of Dor where the Nahsholim Seaside Resort is located at Kibbutz Nahsholim. After dinner and a brief information meeting, we retire to our cabins on the resort’s private Mediterranean beach. (Nahsholim Seaside Resort; D) October 21, Thursday: Nahsholim (Dor) – Nazareth After breakfast we travel south to Caesarea Maritina archaeological site. Caesarea, a historic seaport and home to the summer palace of Herod the Great built in 22 BC and later home to Pontius Pilate. We continue along the coastal plain to Haifa and up Mount Carmel to the Cave of Elijah below the Stelle Maris Monastery or the Monastery of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a 19th-century Discalced Carmelite monastery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea Peoples the Creators of History: a Study of Influence
    Fig. 2:1. Interpreting the research presentations of the ‘Sea Peoples’. (Illustrator: Stina Larsson, author). The Sea Peoples The Creators of History: a Study of Influence Stina Larsson Stina Larsson Vt 2015 Examensarbete, 30 hp Arkeologiprogrammet, 180 hp Stina Larsson Vt 2015 Examensarbete, 30 hp Arkeologiprogrammet, 180 hp Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Aim and Problems ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Aim .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Problems ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Questions .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vogelbarke of Medinet Habu
    THE VOGELBARKE OF MEDINET HABU A Thesis by KRISTIN ROMEY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2003 Major Subject: Anthropology THE VOGELBARKE OF MEDINET HABU A Thesis by KRISTIN ROMEY Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________ ______________________________ Shelley Wachsmann Luis Vieira-De-Castro (Chair of Committee) (Member) ______________________________ ______________________________ Christoph Konrad David Carlson (Member) (Head of Department) December 2003 Major Subject: Anthropology iii ABSTRACT The Vogelbarke of Medinet Habu. (December 2003) Kristin Romey, A.B., Vassar College Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Shelley Wachsmann The Sea Peoples are generally assumed to be a loose confederation of clans that first appeared in the historical record in the 14th century B.C.E. Over a century of scholarship has puzzled over whether they were responsible for the collapse of several Late Bronze Age civilizations or simply one of several catalysts that put that collapse in motion. Many attempts have also been made to determine the origins of the various groups of Sea Peoples using textual and iconographic evidence, as well as the material culture of the Sea Peoples identified in Cyprus and the Levant. This material culture is characterized foremost by locally made Mycenaean-style pottery; as such, a considerable Aegean or Mycenaean presence has been argued in the multi-ethnic Sea Peoples coalition. The most important visual record that survives of the Sea People documents a land and sea battle against the forces of Ramesses III in the early 12th century B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • JHE Wezmeh Accepted.Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Zanolli, Clément and Biglari, Fereidoun and Mashkour, Marjan and Abdi, Kamyar and Monchot, Hervé and Debue, Karyne and Mazurier, Arnaud and Bayle, Priscilla and Le Luyer, Mona and Rougier, Hélène and Trinkaus, Erik and Macchiarelli, Roberto (2019) A Neanderthal from the Central Western Zagros, Iran. Structural reassessment of the Wezmeh 1 maxillary premolar. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/75685/ Document Version Author's Accepted Manuscript Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html A Neanderthal from the Central Western Zagros, Iran. Structural reassessment of the Wezmeh 1 maxillary premolar Clément Zanolli a, *, Fereidoun Biglari
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, 2008
    U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government printing 2008 PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd i 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:040:18:04 AAMM Production and Distribution Notes Th is publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. Th e GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To fi nd a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. Th e electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/stylemanual/index.html. Use of ISBN Prefi x Th is is the offi cial U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identifi ed to certify its authenticity. ISBN 978–0–16–081813–4 is for U.S. Government Printing Offi ce offi cial editions only. Th e Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Offi ce requests that any re- printed edition be labeled clearly as a copy of the authentic work, and that a new ISBN be assigned. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-081813-4 (CD) II PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd iiii 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:050:18:05 AAMM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE STYLE MANUAL IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION AND AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PRINTER OF THE UNITED STATES Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Halifax Citadel
    THE HALIFAX CITADEL National Historic Park Halifax, Nova Scotia Issued under the authority of the Honourable Arthur Laing, P.C., M.P., B.S.A., Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources HALIFAX CITADEL NOVA SCOTIA THE HALIFAX CITADEL Halifax, Nova Scotia Halifax was founded in 1749 to provide a base for the British Navy and Army and a springboard for attack on the French at Louisbourg and Quebec, because the final contest between France and England for possession of the North American continent was clearly approaching. Citadel Hill was always the innermost keep and chief land defence of the Halifax Fortress. Four forts were built, at different periods, on its summit. The first was part of a wooden palisade around the young settlement, designed to protect the settlers from Indians. The second was built at the time of the American Revolution and was intended as a stronghold and base against the rebels. The third was built while Napoleon Bonaparte was trying to conquer the world, and this one was later repaired for the War of 1812 with the United States. Because of the latter war, Britain knew she must have a permanent fortress here as Atlantic base in time of peril, and so the fourth, the present one, was constructed. Not one of these forts was ever called upon to resist invasion. No shot was ever fired against them in anger. However, it is safe to say that they had served their purpose merely by existing. The First Citadel When the Honourable Edward Cornwallis arrived at Chebucto Harbour on June 21, 1749, accompanied by more than 2,500 settlers, one of his first thoughts was to secure the settlement from attacks by marauding Indians, ever ready to molest the British during periods of nominal peace between England and France.
    [Show full text]