Forecasting Scenarios for Children's Television to 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forecasting Scenarios for Children's Television to 2012 Independent research report by Attentional: Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 An independent research report by Attentional The future of children’s television programming Research annex Publication date: 6 November 2007 Contents Section Page Foreword 2 Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 3 Methodology 8 1 Independent research report by Attentional: Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 1 Foreword Ofcom initiated the review of children’s television programming in response to a number of consumer and market changes. These include an increase in the range of media available to many children and a growing number of dedicated children’s channels, as well as changes in the way children consume media. As a result, traditional commercial public service broadcasters are facing significant pressures on their ability to fund original programming for children. These changes are occurring in the context of a new framework for the regulation of children’s programming, set out in the Communications Act 2003. Since the Act, ITV1, which had historically played a role in delivering a strong alternative voice to the BBC in terms of children’s programmes, has significantly reduced its commitments to children’s programming. This development, together with the other consumer and market changes outlined above, has led many to ask how public service children’s programming can continue to be delivered in the future. The Communications Act requires Ofcom to report on the fulfilment of the public service broadcasters’ public service remit at least once every five years and to make recommendations with a view to maintaining and strengthening the quality of public service broadcasting in the future. In preparation for Ofcom’s second full public service broadcasting review, Ofcom has concentrated on the children’s programming aspects of public service broadcasting, focusing on the future prospects for delivery of a wide range of high quality and original content for children. Ofcom’s report on the Future of Children’s Television Programming was published on 3 October 2007 and sets out in full the findings from our research. As part of that report, Ofcom commissioned independent research agency, Attentional, to forecast potential viewing levels to children’s television until digital switchover in 2012 and the composition of viewing of children’s channels and slots within this, based on three possible scenarios for changes in the provision of children’s programming. This annex sets out the findings from Attentional’s research. 2 Independent research report by Attentional: Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 Section 1 Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 1.1 Forecasting viewing to children’s television The prevailing trend of the last decade is that children’s consumption of television overall has declined. Within this there has been a shift away from viewing on the PSB main channels (BBC One, BBC Two, ITV1, Channel 4, Five) towards dedicated children’s channels. Ofcom commissioned independent research agency Attentional to forecast potential viewing levels to children’s programming overall until digital switchover in 2012, as well as the composition of viewing of children’s channels and slots within this, based on a number of possible scenarios. In this analysis children’s programming is defined as all programming on the dedicated children’s channels, together with children’s programming (as defined by the BARB children’s genre classification) on BBC One, BBC Two, ITV11, Channel 4 and Five and the children’s slots on non-terrestrial generalist channels. (See Section 2.2.3 for full details.) 1.1.2 Television audiences Attentional’s modelling work is based on three underlying observed trends. Firstly, there is likely to be a continued fall in the size of the child population (based on projections from the Government’s Actuary Department) which will lead to a decrease in the number of potential child viewers. Secondly, there is likely to be a continued fall in the size of average audience to television among children aged 4-15 years (based on the current downward trend observed in BARB viewing figures, which could potentially be due to increased competition from other media). Thirdly, there is likely to be a continued growth in the number of children with access to digital terrestrial television (Freeview) and cable/satellite television and a decline in analogue terrestrial homes. (The modelling does not explicitly take account of other variables such as internet access and usage. It is assumed that these factors will be reflected in the underlying trends outlined above.) Attentional’s work suggests that over the next six years a decline in the number of children aged 4-15, combined with a decline in their average hours of daily viewing, is likely to produce an 11% drop in the average audience for all television (from 814,000 children aged 4-15 in 2006 to 724,000 children in 2012). Within this, the number of viewers of children’s television airtime will fall by only 5% (from 239,500 children in 2006 to 228,200 children in 2012). 1 GMTV is incorporated within ITV1 in this analysis. 3 Independent research report by Attentional: Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 Figure 1: Forecast average audience to total television (000s) 1000 800 Average audience to non- 600 children's airtime 575 551 535 522 512 503 496 400 Thousands Average audience to 200 children’s airtime 240 240 236 234 232 230 228 0 2006 2007F 2008F 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F Source: Ofcom/Attentional. Note: among children aged 4-15 years. 1.1.2 Television viewing The net impact of these changes is that while children’s average weekly television viewing hours are expected to decline by 8% (from 15.5 hours per week in 2006 to 14.2 hours in 2012), the share of viewing that children’s airtime represents is forecast to increase moderately, from 29.6% to 31.5% of total children’s viewing. This forecast is supported by the trends we are currently observing in changes to television viewing: when children are given more viewing options at the times when most of them are viewing in later afternoon and early evening, as happens in multi-channel households, they tend to increase their viewing of dedicated children’s channels at the expense of viewing in non-children’s airtime. We expect that this trend will continue in homes yet to switch to digital television. Figure 2: Forecast for children’s average weekly hours of viewing Total 15.5 15.2 14.9 14.7 14.6 14.4 14.2 20 Children's airtime 15 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 Non-children's 10 airtime 5 10.8 10.6 10.3 10.2 10.0 9.9 9.7 0 2006 2007F 2008F 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F Source: Ofcom/Attentional/BARB. Note: this is based on children 4-15 years. In short, a forecast for the children’s television market to 2012 is that dedicated children’s channels will gain a larger share of children’s viewing, in the context of a broader decline in overall children’s television viewing. 1.1.3 Scenarios for changes in viewing To assess the cumulative effect of these potential changes, Attentional modelled the likely impact on viewing share in children’s airtime among children 4-15 years for the following different channel groupings: 4 Independent research report by Attentional: Forecasting scenarios for children’s television to 2012 • BBC One/BBC Two; • CBBC/CBeebies; • Commercial Public Service Broadcasters (ITV1, Channel 4 and Five); • Commercial children’s channels and children’s slots on the non-terrestrial generalist channels, grouped together and referred to in this analysis as ‘commercial non- terrestrial’ children’s airtime. Attentional undertook forecasts for three different possible scenarios which represent hypothetical changes in the provision of children’s programming: • Base-case forecast – projection based on historic trends in performance by channels in 2006 and projected changes in television viewing and television audiences (detailed below); • Scenario 1 – removal of children’s programming (CITV slot) on ITV1; all BBC One’s children's programming transferred to BBC Two; preschool slot Milkshake on Five to continue but removal of Shake as announced by Five in Q2 2007; all other channels as per 2006 base case; • Scenario 2 - as Scenario 1, but with an increase in the volume of UK originated programming on the commercial children’s channels, allocating at least 10% of each schedule to UK programming. 1.1.4 Base-case forecast A base-case forecast has been projected on the basis of the historic trends in performance by channels in 2006 and the projected changes in television viewing and television audiences detailed above. This forecasts the total share for the BBC channels taken as whole to remain stable at around 10%, a slight decline for the commercial PSBs from 1.7% total share in 2006 to 1.4% in 2012 and a slight increase for the commercial children’s channels and slots from 18% in 2006 to 20% in 2012. Figure 3: Base-case forecast for share of viewing in children’s airtime Total 29.6 30.5 30.9 31.1 31.3 31.4 31.5 % of total viewing of children’s airtime 35 Commercial non- 30 terrestrial 25 CBBC/Cbeebies 19.5 19.7 19.8 20 20 18 19 19.3 15 Commercial PSBs 10 6.5 6.9 7.2 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.6 BBC One/BBC 5 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 Two 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.8 0 2.7 2.6 2.6 2006 2007F 2008F 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F Source: Ofcom/BARB/Attentional.
Recommended publications
  • TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents
    TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents This report covers 238 international channels/networks across 152 major operators in 34 EMEA countries. From the total, 67 channels (28%) transmit in high definition (HD). The report shows the reader which international channels are carried by which operator – and which tier or package the channel appears on. The report allows for easy comparison between operators, revealing the gaps and showing the different tiers on different operators that a channel appears on. Published in September 2012, this 168-page electronically-delivered report comes in two parts: A 128-page PDF giving an executive summary, comparison tables and country-by-country detail. A 40-page excel workbook allowing you to manipulate the data between countries and by channel. Countries and operators covered: Country Operator Albania Digitalb DTT; Digitalb Satellite; Tring TV DTT; Tring TV Satellite Austria A1/Telekom Austria; Austriasat; Liwest; Salzburg; UPC; Sky Belgium Belgacom; Numericable; Telenet; VOO; Telesat; TV Vlaanderen Bulgaria Blizoo; Bulsatcom; Satellite BG; Vivacom Croatia Bnet Cable; Bnet Satellite Total TV; Digi TV; Max TV/T-HT Czech Rep CS Link; Digi TV; freeSAT (formerly UPC Direct); O2; Skylink; UPC Cable Denmark Boxer; Canal Digital; Stofa; TDC; Viasat; You See Estonia Elion nutitv; Starman; ZUUMtv; Viasat Finland Canal Digital; DNA Welho; Elisa; Plus TV; Sonera; Viasat Satellite France Bouygues Telecom; CanalSat; Numericable; Orange DSL & fiber; SFR; TNT Sat Germany Deutsche Telekom; HD+; Kabel
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Bulletin Issue Number 229 07/05/13
    Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin Issue number 229 7 May 2013 1 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 229 7 May 2013 Contents Introduction 3 Standards cases In Breach Phones 4U’s sponsorship of network films on Channel 4 Channel 4, 26 December 2012, 23:32 6 Kobots Federation: Kobots Dual Action Game sponsorship credits Cartoon Network, Cartoon Network Too, Boomerang, 18 February 2013 to 17 March 2013, various times 9 The Daily Show Comedy Central Extra, 5 March 2013, 20:00 13 Cross promotion for Sky Sports Sky News, 13 February 2013, 23:47 15 Resolved Viewer competitions Channel 5 and 5*, September to November 2012, various times 17 Viewer competitions ITV1 and ITV2 channels, September to November 2012, various times 19 Advertising Scheduling cases In Breach Advertising scheduling Bloomberg Television, various dates and times 21 Breach findings table Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising compliance reports 25 Fairness and Privacy cases Upheld Complaint by Mr C Panorama: Gambling Nation, BBC 1, 5 November 2012 26 2 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 229 7 May 2013 Other Programmes Not in Breach 31 Complaints Assessed, Not Investigated 32 Investigations List 40 3 Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue 229 7 May 2013 Introduction Under the Communications Act 2003 (“the Act”), Ofcom has a duty to set standards for broadcast content as appear to it best calculated to secure the standards objectives1. Ofcom must include these standards in a code or codes. These are listed below. Ofcom also has a duty to secure that every provider of a notifiable On Demand Programme Services (“ODPS”) complies with certain standards requirements as set out in the Act2.
    [Show full text]
  • New Line Cinema Logo History
    New line cinema logo history Continue Share The New Line redirects here. For other purposes, see Contents 1973-1987 1987-2001-present 2011-present New Line Cinema is an American film company. It was founded in 1967 and later became an independent film studio. It did not have an on-screen logo until 1973. 1973-1987 1987-2001-present logo design and letters were changed in 2001 after the purchase of Time Warner AOL. 2011-present In 2008, Time Warner reorganized New Line Cinema to pass from independent studio to subsidiary of Warner Bros. Entertainment. Three years later, the logo scheme was changed from blue to yellow, and is being shown alongside the Warner Bros. Pictures logo to reflect the new organization. Note Due to the fact that New Line began as an independent before becoming a subordinate to Warner Bros., it has always maintained the copyright to its films to the point of having gifts or presentation of a loan, not to mention WB. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise stated. Part of Warner Bros. Entertainment Warner Bros. Pictures Group: Warner Bros. Pictures Group Warner Bros. Animation (Warner Bros. Classic Animation) New Line Cinema (en) Castle Rock Entertainment (en) Cartoon Network Movies Hbo Films HBO Movies HBO Documentary Films (en) CNN Films Van Film Productions Productions (en) Warner Max Spyglass Media Group16 (en) Flagship Entertainment Warner Bros. Television Group: Production Studio: Warner Bros. Tv Studio Bros. International Television (en) Warner Bros. World Television Distribution (en) Telepicture Blue Tape Content (en) Eye Works Volper Organization HBO Entertainment (en) HBO Enterprises (en) HBO Kids (en) T.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Disney Channel’S That’S So Raven Is Classified in BARB As ‘Entertainment Situation Comedy US’
    Children’s television output analysis 2003-2006 Publication date: 2nd October 2007 ©Ofcom Contents • Introduction • Executive summary • Children’s subgenre range • Children’s subgenre range by channel • Children’s subgenre range by daypart: PSB main channels • Appendix ©Ofcom Introduction • This annex is published as a supplement to Section 2 ‘Broadcaster Output’ of Ofcom’s report The future of children’s television programming. • It provides detail on individual channel output by children’s sub-genre for the PSB main channels, the BBC’s dedicated children’s channels, CBBC and CBeebies, and the commercial children’s channels, as well as detail on genre output by day-part for the PSB main channels. (It does not include any children’s output on other commercial generalist non-terrestrial channels, such as GMTV,ABC1, Sky One.) • This output analysis examines the genre range within children’s programming and looks at how this range has changed since 2003. It is based on the BARB Children’s genre classification only and uses the BARB subgenres of Children’s Drama, Factual, Cartoons, Light entertainment/quizzes, Pre-school and Miscellaneous. • It is important to note that the BARB genre classifications have some drawbacks: – All programme output that is targeted at children is not classified as Children’s within BARB. Some shows targeted at younger viewers, either within children’s slots on the PSB main channels or on the dedicated children’s channels are not classified as Children’s. For example, Disney Channel’s That’s so raven is classified in BARB as ‘Entertainment Situation Comedy US’. This output analysis is not based on the total output of each specific children’s channel, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • MCPS TV Fpvs
    MCPS Broadcast Blanket Distribution - TV FPV Rates paid October 2012 Non Peak Non Peak P(ence) P(ence) Peak FPV Non Peak Programmes Programme Rate (per Rate (per (per FPV (per (covered by s (covered Source/Sho Manufactur Link weighted weighted weighted weighted blanket by blanket Licensee Channel Name rt Code udc er Number code second) second) minute) minute) licence) licence) BBC BBC 1 BBCTVD Z0003 5258 jyd 69.334 34.667 41.6004 20.8002 Y Y BBC BBC 2 BBC2 Z0004 316168 jye 20.908 10.454 12.5448 6.2724 Y Y BBC BBC ALBA BBCALB Z0008 232662 jyi 5.432 2.716 3.2592 1.6296 Y Y BBC BBC HD BBCHD Z0010 232654 jyk 6.095 3.047 3.657 1.8282 Y Y BBC BBC News BBC NE Z0007 127284 jyh 8.725 4.362 5.235 2.6172 Y Y BBC BBC Parliament BBCPAR Z0009 316176 jyj 2.934 1.467 1.7604 0.8802 Y Y BBC BBC Side Agreement for S4C BBCS4C Z0222 316184 jdc 0 4.188 0 2.5128 Y Y BBC BBC3 BBC3 Z0001 126187 jyb 16.128 8.064 9.6768 4.8384 Y Y BBC BBC4 BBC4 Z0002 158776 jyc 7.946 3.973 4.7676 2.3838 Y Y BBC CBBC CBBC Z0005 165235 jyf 11.218 5.609 6.7308 3.3654 Y Y BBC Cbeebies CBEEBI Z0006 285496 jyg 11.837 5.918 7.1022 3.5508 Y Y BBC WorldwideBBC Entertainment Africa BBCENA Z0296 286601 jex 1.291 0.645 0.7746 0.387 N Y BBC WorldwideBBC Entertainment Nordic BBCENN Z0300 286619 jf2 0.543 0.271 0.3258 0.1626 N Y BBC WorldwideBBC Entertainment Poland BBCEPO Z0292 286627 jet 2.244 1.122 1.3464 0.6732 N Y BBC WorldwideBBC HD Pan Europe/Nordic BBCHNO Z0303 286635 jf5 4.484 2.242 2.6904 1.3452 N Y BBC WorldwideBBC Knowledge Africa BBCKAF Z0297 286643 jey 0.672 0.336 0.4032 0.2016 N
    [Show full text]
  • Codes Used in D&M
    CODES USED IN D&M - MCPS A DISTRIBUTIONS D&M Code D&M Name Category Further details Source Type Code Source Type Name Z98 UK/Ireland Commercial International 2 20 South African (SAMRO) General & Broadcasting (TV only) International 3 Overseas 21 Australian (APRA) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 36 USA (BMI) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 38 USA (SESAC) Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 39 USA (ASCAP) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 47 Japanese (JASRAC) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 48 Israeli (ACUM) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 048M Norway (NCB) International 3 Overseas 049M Algeria (ONDA) International 3 Overseas 58 Bulgarian (MUSICAUTOR) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 62 Russian (RAO) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 74 Austrian (AKM) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 75 Belgian (SABAM) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 79 Hungarian (ARTISJUS) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 80 Danish (KODA) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 81 Netherlands (BUMA) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 83 Finnish (TEOSTO) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 84 French (SACEM) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 85 German (GEMA) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 86 Hong Kong (CASH) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 87 Italian (SIAE) General & Broadcasting International 3 Overseas 88 Mexican (SACM) General & Broadcasting
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1049Kb)
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 22.7.2008 SEC(2008) 2310 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Eighth Communication on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC ‘Television without Frontiers’, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 2005- 2006 [COM(2008) 481 final] EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 1: Performance indicators...................................................... 3 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 2: Charts and tables on the application of Articles 4 and 5... 6 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 3: Application of Articles 4 and 5 in each Member State ... 12 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 4: Summary of the reports from the Member States ........... 44 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 5: Voluntary reports by Bulgaria and Romania................. 177 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 6: Reports from the Member States of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area ......................................... 182 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 7: Average transmission time of European works by channels with an audience share above 3% .. ........................................................................ 187 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 8: List of television channels in the Member States which failed to achieve the majority proportion required by Article 4............................................. 195 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 9: List of television channels in the Member States which failed to achieve the minimum proportion required by Article 5........................................... 213 EN 2 EN BACKGROUND DOCUMENT 1: Performance indicators The following indicators facilitate the evaluation of compliance with the proportions referred to in Article 4 and 5 of the Directive. Indicators 2 – 5 are based on criteria set out in Articles 4 and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Right Society Limited Distribution Rules
    PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LIMITED DISTRIBUTION RULES PRS distribution policy rules Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 12 Scope of the PRS Distribution Policy ................................................................................ 12 General distribution policy principles ............................................................................. 12 Policy review and decision-making processes ............................................................. 13 DISTRIBUTION CYCLES AND CONCEPTS ................................................. 15 Standard distribution cycles and frequency .................................................................. 15 Distribution basis ..................................................................................................................... 15 Distribution sections ............................................................................................................... 16 Non-licence revenue ............................................................................................................... 16 Administration recovery rates ............................................................................................ 16 Donation to the PRS Foundation and Members Benevolent Fund ........................ 17 Weightings .................................................................................................................................. 17 Points and point values .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ekonomska Učinkovitost Globalnih Medijskih Konglomeratov
    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Marija Igerc Ekonomska učinkovitost globalnih medijskih konglomeratov Diplomsko delo Ljubljana, 2015 UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Marija Igerc Mentor: red. prof. dr. Borut Marko Lah Ekonomska učinkovitost globalnih medijskih konglomeratov Diplomsko delo Ljubljana, 2015 Ekonomska učinkovitost globalnih medijskih konglomeratov V zadnjih tridesetih letih so prevzemi in spojitve postali ena najpogostejših strategij podjetij v medijski industriji. Mnogi avtorji takšno združevanje medijskih podjetij povezujejo z maksimiranjem dobička, saj naj bi se na ta način povečala tako tržna moč kot tudi učinkovitost poslovanja podjetij. V diplomskem delu trdim, da koncentrirano medijsko lastništvo ne povečuje ekonomske učinkovitosti kapitala. Sinergije ne prinašajo pričakovanih izjemnih dobičkov. Doseg diplomskega dela ni tako velik, da bi lahko sama izvedla kvantitativno analizo največjih globalnih medijskih konglomeratov, zato sem ga napisala pretežno teoretično, ob tem pa sem se naslonila na nekaj mednarodno objavljenih študij. Rezultati delno podpirajo mojo prvotno hipotezo, saj so pokazali, da nekateri ekonomski kazalniki ne kažejo boljših rezultatov v tistih medijskih podjetjih, v katerih se je kapital v veliki meri združeval in koncentriral. Zdi se, da so megamedijske združitve za marsikoga razočaranje. Ključne besede: medijska industrija, prevzemi in spojitve, medijski konglomerati, koncentracija lastništva, sinergije. Economic efficiency of global media conglomerates In the past thirty years, acquisitions and mergers have become one of the most common strategies of companies in the media industry. Many authors associate such integration of media companies with profit maximization, since it should increase market power and efficiency of business operations. In the thesis I argue that concentrated media ownership does not increase the economic efficiency of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapporto Televisione E Infanzia
    Focus in Media STUDI E RICERCHE Televisione e Infanzia Focus in Media Rapporto sull’offerta della Fondazione televisiva per bambini per la Sussidiarietà in Italia STUDI E RICERCHE Focus in Media Televisione e Infanzia Rapporto sull’offerta televisiva per bambini Focus in Media in Italia della Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà Team di ricerca Piermarco Aroldi, Marco Deriu, Daniele Milesi, Maria Francesca Murru, Matteo Stefanelli, Nicoletta Vittadini Focus in Media della Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà Il Focus in Media della Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà nasce nel 2011 con lo scopo di sviluppare un’analisi indipendente del sistema comunicativo italiano e dei suoi molteplici attori e dinamiche (emittenti, contenuti, linguaggi, pubblici, contesti, processi evolutivi). Il lavoro di ricerca del Focus in Media intende individuare temi e problemi particolarmente rilevanti da sottoporre all’attenzione delle istituzioni, degli operatori dei media e dell’opinione pubblica, e avanzare idee e proposte rivolte a rendere il sistema della comunicazione sempre più rispondente alle esigenze di crescita civile della società italiana e capace di valorizzare le diverse identità sociali e culturali in essa presenti. Comitato scientifico Piermarco Aroldi, Università Cattolica di Milano Fausto Colombo, Università Cattolica di Milano Vincenzo Costa, Università del Molise David Anthony Forgacs, New York University (USA) Guido Gili (Coordinatore), Università del Molise Matthew Hibberd, University of Stirling (UK) Giuseppe Richeri, Università della Svizzera Italiana di Lugano (CH) Philip Schlesinger, University of Glasgow (UK) Michele Sorice, LUISS “Guido Carli”, Roma Centri di ricerca Il Forum in Media della Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà si avvale per la realizzazione delle singole ricerche dei seguenti Centri e Istituti: CCPR - Centre for Cultural Policy Research, University of Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • ―Kiteretsu‖ Is One of the Very Old Japanese Cartoon Show, and It Is Running for Over 35 Years Now, and It Is Very Popular Among Children
    ―Kiteretsu‖ is one of the very old Japanese cartoon show, and it is running for over 35 years now, and it is very popular among children. When I was child I used to love this show, because it was full of fun, and full of scientific wonders. ―Kiteretsu‖ is all about a story of a little boy named Kiteretsu, who liked to invent new things by reading his grandfather secret book. And the whole story moves around him that how he helps people with his inventions, and also how he gets into troubles because of his inventions. When I was a child I used to like this story, and it motivated me to built new things on my own, and it was fun. I like the character of ―Korusuke‖, who is the little robot friend of Kiteretsu. Korusuke is very cute, and he is a little samurai robot, he always tries to help other people, and he always make disturbance in Kiteretsu’s inventions. Other characters are cute also like ―Miyoko,Tongari,Buta Gorilla,Mr.Benzo‖. All of them are cute, and this show is very much educational, and it helps to teach our children to make their own mark in life, and it also helps to show the true friendship. Overall this show is very nice for children. When I was kid, I like the show, and after 25 years I still love to watch this show, it never becomes old for me; it is the best cartoon ever. Rating: 8 AnimeBakaChan I really liked Naruto! It's my favorite anime and I've seen A LOT! The story is about a 12 year old named Naruto who is fighting for acknowledgement from his villagers and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Channel Has Widest Distribution in Europe
    Discovery Channel has widest distribution in Europe The Discovery Channel is the widest distributed network in Europe, according to a new report from Digital TV Research. Covering 270 international channels/networks across 212 major operators in 43 EMEA countries, the TV Channel Distribution in Europe report concluded that the Discovery Channel was available on 171 platforms. Top 10 channels by carriage Group Channel No of operators Discovery Discovery Channel 171 Fox National Geographic Channel 169 Eurosport Eurosport 164 Viacom MTV 160 Turner CNN 157 Disney Disney Channel 154 BBC BBC World News 153 Turner Cartoon Network 149 Eurosport Eurosport 2 145 Discovery Animal Planet 140 Source: Digital TV Research HD channels are growing in importance as operators are eager to give subscribers something new. Of the 270 total tracked, 86 channels (32%) transmit in high definition (HD). National Geographic provides the most distributed HD channel. The UK’s BSkyB leads in HDTV provision, by offering more than 67 HD channels. Top 10 HD channels by carriage Group Channel No of operators Fox National Geographic Channel HD 126 Eurosport Eurosport HD 122 Fox Nat Geo Wild HD 85 Discovery Discovery HD Showcase 74 AETN History HD 65 Viacom MTV Live HD 62 Discovery Animal Planet HD 61 Eurosport Eurosport 2 HD 59 Fox Fox HD 46 HBO HBO HD 38 Source: Digital TV Research Companies stress the importance that a stable of channels has for pan-European success. In this report, 14 groups contributed 257 channels – or 95% of the total. In fact, these groups provided 83 of the 86 HD channels covered.
    [Show full text]