DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Application of Investment Attractiveness Methodology To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Application of Investment Attractiveness Methodology To Emnekode: 317090 Navn på kandidat: Rodion Kravchenko Six seas: Comparative application of investment attractiveness methodology to Arctic offshore petroleum provinces Dato: 17. 05. 2016 Totalt antall sider: 97 Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 3 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Theoretical framework ...................................................................................................... 10 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 15 4. Arctic resource extraction: challenges and opportunities .............................................. 17 Driving of the Arctic oil and gas development ............................................................................. 17 Obstacles to Arctic oil and gas development ................................................................................ 21 Conditions under which exploration activities in the Arctic region should be allowed to proceed ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 26 5. Investment attractiveness: The Arctic dimension ........................................................... 28 Weather factors ............................................................................................................................... 32 The Barents Sea ............................................................................................................................ 32 The Kara Sea ................................................................................................................................ 35 The Laptev Sea ............................................................................................................................. 37 The Chukchi Sea ........................................................................................................................... 38 The Beaufort Sea .......................................................................................................................... 40 Baffin Bay..................................................................................................................................... 42 Weather factors comparison ......................................................................................................... 44 Geographical factors ....................................................................................................................... 49 The Barents Sea ............................................................................................................................ 49 The Kara Sea ................................................................................................................................ 50 The Laptev Sea ............................................................................................................................. 52 The Chukchi Sea ........................................................................................................................... 53 The Beaufort Sea .......................................................................................................................... 55 Baffin Bay..................................................................................................................................... 56 Geographical factors comparison ................................................................................................. 59 Oil and gas taxation systems .......................................................................................................... 63 Norway ......................................................................................................................................... 63 Russia............................................................................................................................................ 64 The United States of America ....................................................................................................... 65 Canada .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Greenland...................................................................................................................................... 69 Oil and gas taxation systems comparison ..................................................................................... 71 Investor protection .......................................................................................................................... 73 Sub-factors description ................................................................................................................. 73 “Investor protection” factor comparison ...................................................................................... 75 Investment attractiveness: comparison of the Arctic regions ..................................................... 76 6. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 83 7. Bibliography: ...................................................................................................................... 85 8. Appendix ............................................................................................................................. 95 2 List of Tables Table 1: Weather factors comparison ....................................................................................... 45 Table 2: Weather factors table of ranks ................................................................................... 48 Table 3: Geographical factors comparison ............................................................................... 59 Table 4: Geographical factors table of ranks ........................................................................... 62 Table 5: Petroleum taxation regimes comparison (the Arctic dimension) ............................... 71 Table 6: ”Investor protection” factor comparison .................................................................... 76 Table 7: Investment attractiveness comparative table of ranks ................................................ 78 Table 8: Investment attraciveness ranking of nine arctic offshore petroleum provinces ......... 82 3 Summary In the 2000s, Arctic energy sources development climbed to the top of the energy companies’ and authorities’ agendas. The necessity to increase production volumes and the desire to find new large oil and gas fields triggered investment flows into the Arctic. However, in 2014 the situation changed. The sudden oil price decline left most of the Arctic resources economically unviable and upended the strategic priorities of the main market players: booming investment was replaced by austerity measures. Previously it had been expected that the Arctic states would compete over the natural resources, but with low energy prices they started to compete for investment instead as only the most economically attractive projects could now be financed. This raises the question of the comparative attractiveness of different parts of the Arctic, as oil and gas companies choose where to invest their money. This thesis therefore develops a methodology for analyzing and comparing the investment attractiveness of Arctic offshore petroleum provinces and applies it to nine Arctic maritime areas spread across six Arctic seas. The nine areas are selected, assessed and compared on four dimensions that can affect their attractiveness for investment in oil and gas projects: climatic harshness, geography, petroleum taxation system and quality of investor protection. Based on this multidimensional analysis the Arctic Seas are ranked according to their investment attractiveness. The most attractive areas are the Russian Barents and Kara Seas and the Alaskan Chukchi Sea. Thereafter comes the Norwegian Barents Sea, followed by the Canadian Beaufort Sea, and then Canada’s Baffin Bay. The lowest ranked are the Laptev Sea, the Alaskan Beaufort Sea and Greenland’s Baffin Bay. The analysis represents quite a general and, to a certain extent, simplified approach and is intended only as a first step in the complex process of investment decision-making. 4 1. Introduction Thinking about the main idea of the future thesis, I wanted to develop something new, applied and complex. After several months of long and thorough examination I decided to write a work that would allow to overcome the gap between the physical characteristics of the Arctic region and the business climate dimension. That is how the following research problem was born: What is the investment attractiveness of different parts of the Arctic with regard to the development of oil and gas resources? Most of the papers about the Arctic are devoted either to geography or geopolitics. This thesis addresses the research problem by developing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRYOSTRATIGRAPHY of the FIRST TERRACE in BELY ISLAND, KARA SEA: PERMAFROST and CLIMATE HISTORY (Part 3) E.A
    Kriosfera Zemli, 2014, vol. XVIII, No. 3, pp. 32–43 http://www.izdatgeo.ru CRYOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE FIRST TERRACE IN BELY ISLAND, KARA SEA: PERMAFROST AND CLIMATE HISTORY (Part 3) E.A. Slagoda1,2, A.N. Kurchatova1,2, O.L. Opokina1,2, I.V. Tomberg3, T.V. Khodzher3, A.D. Firsova3, E.V. Rodionova3, K.A. Popov1, E.L. Nikulina1 1 Earth Cryosphere Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, P/O box 1230 Tyumen, 625000, Russia; [email protected] 2Tyumen State Oil and Gas University, 56 Volodarskogo str., Tyumen, 625000, Russia 3Limnological Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 Ulan-Batorskaya str., Irkutsk, 664033, Russia The distribution of lithological and permafrost facies deposited on the first terrace of Bely Island in the Kara Sea record alternated freezing and thawing cycles. The cryostratigraphy of the terrace, with constraints from data on the taxonomic diversity and habitats of microphytes found in the sediments, allows detailed reconstructions of the permafrost and deposition history associated with Late Pleistocene-Holocene climate and sea level changes. Cryostratigraphy, lithology, сryofacies, microphyte, thermokarst, taberal deposits, sealevel, Kara Sea INTRODUCTION The deposition history of frozen coastal and shelf In the West Arctic, however, the late Quaternary facies and formation of thermokarst in the context of climate and sealevel correlations remain more contro- latest Cenozoic sealevel changes in the Arctic Kara versial (Fig. 1) being interfered with a warming effect Sea area has been much less studied than in the East from the Atlantic water penetrated into the Barents- Arctic shelf. Freezing of shelf sediments in most of the Kara region [Polyakova, 1997].
    [Show full text]
  • Translitterering Och Alternativa Geografiska Namnformer
    TRANSLITTERERING OCH ALTERNATIVA GEOGRAFISKA NAMNFORMER Version XX, 27 juli 2015, Stefan Nordblom 1 FÖRORD För många utländska egennamn, i första hand personnamn och geografiska namn, finns det på svenska väl etablerade namnformer. Om det inte finns någon sådan kan utländska egennamn dock vålla bekymmer vid översättning till svenska. Föreliggande material är tänkt att vara till hjälp i sådana situationer och tar upp fall av translitterering1 och transkribering2 samt exonymer3 . Problemen uppstår främst på grund av att olika språk har olika system för translitterering och transkribering från ett visst språk och på grund av att orter kan ha olika namn på olika utländska språk. Eftersom vi oftast översätter från engelska och franska innehåller sammanställningen även translittereringar och exonymer på engelska och franska (samt tyska). Man kan alltså i detta material göra en sökning på sådana namnformer och komma fram till den svenska namnformen. Om man t.ex. i en engelsk text träffar på det geografiska namnet Constance kan man söka på det namnet här och då få reda på att staden (i detta fall på tyska och) på svenska kallas Konstanz. Den efterföljande sammanställningen bygger i huvudsak på följande källor: Institutet för de inhemska språken (FI): bl.a. skriften Svenska ortnamn i Finland - http://kaino.kotus.fi/svenskaortnamn/ Iate (EU-institutionernas termbank) Nationalencyklopedin Nationalencyklopedins kartor Interinstitutionella publikationshandboken - http://publications.europa.eu/code/sv/sv-000100.htm Språkbruk (Tidskrift utgiven av Svenska språkbyrån i Helsingfors) Språkrådet© (1996). Publikation med rekommendationer i term- och språkfrågor som utarbetas av rådets svenska översättningsenhet i samråd med övriga EU-institutioner. TT-språket - info.tt.se/tt-spraket/ I de fall uppgifterna i dessa källor inte överensstämmer med varandra har det i enskilda fall varit nödvändigt att väga, välja och sammanjämka namnförslagen, varvid rimlig symmetri har eftersträvats.
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042973 on 5 October 2020. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042973 on 5 October 2020. Downloaded from Patient experience studies in the circumpolar region: a scoping review Journal: BMJ Open ManuscriptFor ID peerbmjopen-2020-042973 review only Article Type: Original research Date Submitted by the 21-Jul-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Ingemann, Christine; University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health
    [Show full text]
  • 4604. Declaration
    Page 1 4450. Declaration By a decree dated 15 January 1985, the USSR Council of Ministers approved a list of the geographical co-ordinates of the points defining the position of the baselines for measuring the breadth of the territorial sea, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of the USSR off the continental coast and islands of the Arctic Ocean and the Baltic and Black seas, as given below. The same decree establishes that the waters of the White Sea south of the line connecting Cape Svyatoy Nos with Cape Kanin Nos, the waters of Cheshskaya/Bay south of the line connecting Cape Mikulkin with Cape Svyatoy/Nos (Timansky), and the waters of Baidaratskaya Bay south-east of the line connecting Cape Yuribeisalya with Cape Belushy Nos are, as waters historically belonging to the USSR, internal waters. Arctic Ocean Co-ordinates Point Geographical location North East number of point latitude longitude 1 Boundary sign No. 415 (sea buoy) 69°47'41" 30°49'15" 2 Cape Nemetsky 69°57.2' 31°56.7' 3 Islet to the east of Cape 69 57.2 31 57.2 Nemetsky 4 Cape Kekursky 69 56.7 32 03.5 5 Islet to the south-east of 69 56.4 32 05.4 Cape Kekursky 6 Islet off Cape Lognavolok 69 46.2 32 57.4 7 Islet off Cape Laush 69 44.5 33 04.8 Thence following the low-water line to point 8 8 Rybachy Peninsula, Cape 69 42.9 33 07.9 Tsypnavolok 9 Kil'din Island, north-west coast 69 22.8 34 01.8 Thence following the low-water line to point 10 10 Kil'din Island, eastern 69 20.0 34 24.2 extremity 11 Cape to the east of Cape 69 15.2 35 15.2 Teribersky 12 Cape to the
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Compatibility in Ecological, Traditional, And
    Anthropogenic Impacts on Habitat Structure and Species Richness in the West Siberian Arctic Olga Khitun Olga Rebristaya Abstract—Intensive technogenous invasion in the West Siberian Arctic during the last two decades in connection with gas and oil exploration, along with the constant growth of domestic reindeer herds, has caused dramatic changes in arctic ecosystems. Loss of biodiversity on the species level has not yet been documented in the region on a whole, but changes in ecosystems in intensively exploited areas are obvious. The absence of some plant species and the disap- pearance of rare bird species surrounding the Bovanenkovo Gas Field in central Yamal is likely the result of technogenous destruction of their habitats. Length of recovery for different habitats varies greatly. Only about 40 percent of local flora can colonize anthropogenic habi- tats. Habitats such as well-drained southern slopes occupied by herbaceous meadows, willow copses in the flood plains, coastal marshes, and isolated outposts of trees contain the largest amount of rare species. These are mainly relics of the past, while at the same time are the most vulnerable to disturbance. They should be of special concern. Nature reserves in the region are not representative enough and are not practical in function. Introduction ______________________________________________________ Different sectors of the Arctic vary in terms of geological history, formation of biota, and land-use history. The Yamal-Gydan region (namely Yamal, Gydansky, and Tazovsky Peninsulas) is one of the most inaccessible and sparsely inhabited parts of the Arctic. It spreads northward from the Polar Circle for more than 750 km (466 miles).
    [Show full text]
  • UTLÄNDSKA NAMN PÅ SVENSKA Handbok Om Translitterering Och Alternativa Geografiska Namnformer
    Europeiska unionens råd UTLÄNDSKA NAMN PÅ SVENSKA Handbok om translitterering och alternativa geografiska namnformer Print PDF ISBN 978-92-824-6454-0 ISBN 978-92-824-6453-3 doi:10.2860/70837 doi:10.2860/340896 QC-01-18-698-SV-C QC-01-18-698-SV-N UTLÄNDSKA NAMN PÅ SVENSKA-Couverture.indd 3 08/10/2018 16:06 UTLÄNDSKA NAMN PÅ SVENSKA-Couverture.indd 4 08/10/2018 16:06 UTLÄNDSKA NAMN PÅ SVENSKA Handbok om translitterering och alternativa geografiska namnformer Stefan Nordblom (red. version XXII Gustaf Hansson) Meddelande Notice HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Denna publikation har framställtsThis av rådets publication generalsekretariat. is produced by Den the tillhandahållsGeneral Secretariat endast of i theinformationssyfte Council and is intended och for information purposes only. It does not involve the responsibility of the EU institu- Free publications: medför inte något ansvar för EU-institutionerna eller medlemsstaterna. tions or the member states. • one copy: För mer information om Europeiska rådet och rådet, se: via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); www.consilium.europa.eu For further information on the European Council and the Council, see the website: • more than one copy or posters/maps: eller kontakta rådssekretariatets enhetwww.co förns informationilium.europa.eu till allmänheten: or contact the Public Information Service of the General Secretariat of the Council: from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm); Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm); Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*).
    [Show full text]
  • Assw2017-Abstract-Book.Pdf
    THE ARCTIC SCIENCE SUMMIT WEEK 2017 31 MARCH – 7 APRIL 2017, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC CLARION CONGRESS HOTEL “A Dynamic Arctic in Global Change” BOOK OF ABSTRACTS BOOK OF ABSTRACTSBOOK OF – THE ARCTIC WEEK SCIENCE 2017 SUMMIT CONTENT LIST OF ABSTRACTS (SESSION ORDER) 2 LIST OF ABSTRACTS (PRESENTATION NUMBER ORDER) 11 PLENARY LECTURES 20 ORAL AND POSTER PRESENTATIONS 23 S01 THE STATE OF ARCTIC GLACIERS AND ICE CAPS 23 S02 THE ECOLOGY OF SEA ICE, PELAGIC AND BENTHIC BIOTA IN ARCTIC SEASONAL SEA ICE ZONES 32 S03 ARCTIC CLOUDS, AEROSOLS AND CLIMATE EFFECTS 39 S04 HEMISPHERIC AND REGIONAL ATMOSPHERIC IMPACTS OF A RAPIDLY CHANGING ARCTIC CLIMATE 54 S05 ARCTIC OCEAN DYNAMICS, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE 69 S06 ARCTIC HYDROLOGY: BIOGEOCHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL FLUXES 86 S07 CARBON VULNERABILITY OF PERMAFROST SOILS 96 S08 MICROBIAL DIVERSITY IN THE WAKE OF WEAKENING BIOGEOGRAPHIC ZONES AROUND THE ARCTIC 101 S09 TERRESTRIAL ALGAE – MOLECULAR DIVERSITY, GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION, ECOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY 107 S10 ARCTIC ANIMALS AND THEIR PARASITES 112 S11 CLIMATE WARMING EFFECTS ON ORGANISM SIZE AND GROWTH RATE IN THE ARCTIC SYSTEMS – FROM PAST RECORDS TO FUTURE CONSEQUENCES 115 S12 CHANGES IN ARCTIC SPRING AS OBSERVED IN NY-ÅLESUND, SVALBARD 123 S13.1 ARCTIC DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE MEETS SYSTEM SCIENCE 129 S13.2 ARCTIC TRANSECTS 138 S15 LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVES ON ARCTIC CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGY, PALAEOENVIRONMENTS AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 145 S16 MARINE, COASTAL AND TERRESTRIAL ARCTIC PRODUCTIVITY IN HUMAN AND ECOSYSTEM CONTEXTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Reindeer (Rangifer Tarandus)
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2018. 3(3): 1–14 DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2018.040 ============== ОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИ ============== =============== REVIEW ARTICLES =============== THE WILD REINDEER (RANGIFER TARANDUS: CERVIDAE, MAMMALIA) ON THE ARCTIC ISLANDS OF RUSSIA: A REVIEW Ivan A. Mizin1, Taras P. Sipko2, Andrey V. Davydov3, Alexander R. Gruzdev4 1Russian Arctic National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 3Information and Analysis Control Centre of Hunting Game and Their Habitats, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 4State Nature Reserve Wrangel Island, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 20.02.2018 The article presents summary data on the wild reindeer’s (Rangifer tarandus) distribution on islands in the Rus- sian Arctic. It discusses the abundance, diet, and general state of knowledge about the species in remote areas, especially on Novaya Zemlya and Wrangel Island. Brief data are provided about domestic reindeer grazing on the Arctic islands. Literature data are complemented with research findings in recent years. A negative trend is demonstrated in the wild reindeer abundance; also the need for studying isolated populations is emphasised. Key words: abundance, Arctic, distribution, domestic and wild reindeer, living environment, Novaya Zemlya, nutrition peculiarities, Wrangel Island Introduction on other populations are not available, although it Currently, information about the reindeer (Ran- seems likely that the taxonomic status of the rein- gifer tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758)) on the Arctic is- deer on the Arctic islands is significantly different. lands is fragmented and scarce. The populations of Studies of reindeer inhabiting the Russian is- these reindeer are under the impact of extreme con- lands are utterly scarce, and they do not cover all ditions of high latitudes, and are not numerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 1 – Search Strings Overview in Table
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Open Supplement 1 – Search strings Overview in table Patient Geographical/population block/terms experience terms "patient Broad geographic regions experience*" (circumpolar or polar or arctic or greenland or Alaska or iceland or ((north* or "patient rural or remote or polar or arctic or circumpolar) adj3 (norway or sweden or satisfaction" finland or Russia)) or "Barents region").ti,ab,kw. "PREM#" (health and Indigenous group terms "user (inuit or sami or saami or "First Nation#" or metis or inuk or yup'ik or Inuviat* satisfaction") or Yupik* or Aleut* or Inupia* or "Alaska Native#" or dene or gwichin or "patient gwich'in or Athabas* or).ti,ab,kw. input" (health and Canada geographic terms "user (nunavut or nunavik or nunatsiavut or inuvialuit or yukon or northwest feedback") territories or nunavummiut or kitikmeot or qitirmiut or kivalliq or qikiqtani or (health and baffin or kuujjuaq).ti,ab,kw. "consumer satisfaction") Sweden geographic terms (health and (Jamtland or (Berg not “balance scale”) or Bracke or Krokom or Ragunda or "consumer Stromsund or (Are adj1 (Jamtland or Sweden or Sverige)) or Ostersund or feedback") Harjedalen or Vasternorrland or Sundsvallor Timra or Ange or Harnosand or (health and “Kramfors Solleftea” or Ornskoldsvik or Vasterbotten or Dorotea or Lycksele "client or Mala or Sorsele or Storuman or Vilhelmina or Asele or Norsjo or Robertsfors satisfaction") or Skelleftea or Umea or Vindeln or Vannas or Bjurholm or Nordmaling or (health and Norrbotten or Pajala or Overtornea or Overkalix or Boden or Kalix or "client Haparanda or Alysbyn or Lulea or Pitea or Kiruna or Gallivare or Jokkmokk or feedback") Arjeplog or Arvidsjaur).ti,ab,kw.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: Review of Monitoring Indicators for Rangifer in Preparation for Arctic Caribou Status and Trends Reporting
    1 Final report: Review of monitoring indicators for Rangifer in preparation for Arctic caribou status and trends reporting Funded by Environment Canada on behalf of the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program Anne Gunn and Don Russell CARMA 27 March 2015 Photos by Susan Kutz, Wendy Nixon and Anne Gunn 2 INTRODUCTION In this report we outline monitoring activities of the CircumArctic Rangifer Monitoring and Assessment (CARMA) Network that can contribute to the 2017 State of The Arctic Terrestrial Biodiversity (StArT) Report. Based on this overview, we: (1) describe CARMA’s approach to indicators developed since 2005. (2) relate indicators to the large herbivore Focal Ecosystem Component (FEC) attributes identified in the Arctic Terrestrial Biodiversity Monitoring Plan; and (3) recommend caribou indicators that could be developed for the StArT report. In describing CARMA’s monitoring, we have summarised the background context for CARMA relative to the Arctic Council and its constituent bodies responsible for terrestrial monitoring. The Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Working Group of the Arctic Council (CAFF), is the biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council. In February 2000, CAFF met in Iceland to respond to an Arctic Council recommendation that a circumpolar monitoring network be established and then in 2001, CAFF published the first overview of circum-arctic biodiversity (Arctic Flora and Fauna: Status and Conservation ). The overview noted the fragmentary nature of information available to describe trends and a similar theme of information gaps was emphasized when the 2005 Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) recommended that arctic biodiversity monitoring be expanded. In response CAFF initiated the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP) charged with establishing species monitoring networks and CAFF proposed that that one of the species networks monitor Rangifer and their interactions with people.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness in the Circumpolar North: Searching for Compatibility in Ecological, Traditional, and Ecotourism Values; 2001 May 15–16; Anchorage, AK
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness in the Forest Service Rocky Mountain Circumpolar North: Research Station Proceedings Searching for Compatibility Report RMRS-P-26 September 2002 in Ecological, Traditional, and Ecotourism Values 2001 May 15–16; Anchorage, Alaska Abstract ________________________________________________________ Watson, Alan E.; Alessa, Lilian; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2002. Wilderness in the Circumpolar North: searching for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values; 2001 May 15–16; Anchorage, AK. Proceedings RMRS-P-26. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 143 p. There are growing pressures on undeveloped (wild) places in the Circumpolar North. Among them are pressures for economic development, oil and gas exploration and extraction, development of geothermal energy resources, development of heavy industry close to energy sources, and lack of appreciation for “other” orientations toward wilderness resources by interested parties from broad geographical origins. An international seminar in Anchorage, Alaska, in May of 2001, was the first step in providing basic input to an analysis of the primary set of values associated with Circumpolar North wilderness and the constraints and contributors (factors of influence) that either limit or facilitate receipt of those values to various segments of society. Keywords: biodiversity, tourism, wilderness, conflict, collaboration, culture, traditional ecological knowledge The Compilers Alan E. Watson is the Research Social Scientist with the Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute and Executive Editor for Science for the International Journal of Wilderness. The Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute is an interagency (Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey) unit administered by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas in the Russian Arctic Download
    PROTECTED AREAS IN THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC: CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT УДК 502.21(985-751.1) ББК 28.088л6 CONTENTS C PREFACE 4 Protected Areas in the Russian Arctic: Current State and Prospects for Development C by M.S. Stishov INTRODUCTION 6 ISBN 978-5-906219-06-0 1. THE EXISTING NETWORK OF PROTECTED AREAS IN THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC 11 This book is a contribution towards fulfilling the Russian Federation’s commitment in the field of protected areas under the Convention on Biological Diversity. It includes analyses of the representativeness of protected areas in the 2. REPRESENTATIVENESS, COMPLETENESS AND MAIN GAPS arctic region of Russia and assessment of their role in the conservation of rare and valuable species of flora and fauna. OF THE PROTECTED AREA NETWORK IN THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC 32 The book is the first study of the representativeness of regional protected areas that includes a comprehensive analysis 2.1. Representativeness and completeness of the Russian Arctic protected area network for of protected areas of all categories. Problems related to regional protected areas, options for solving the identified problems, and prospects for enhancing Russia’s arctic protected area networks are all based on the analyses of the landscapes and ecosystems 33 representativeness and completeness that are presented in this book. 2.1.1. Polar desert and tundra zones 33 The book’s target audiences are experts working in regional and federal governmental bodies responsible for the 2.1.3. Pacific maritime subarctic zone 58 functioning of protected areas, staff of existing protected areas, and all those interested in wildlife conservation in Russia.
    [Show full text]