DOCSLIB.ORG

Bear Creek Mining Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bear Creek Mining Corporation INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation v. Republic of Perú (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21) AWARD Members of the Tribunal Prof. Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, President of the Tribunal Dr. Michael Pryles, Arbitrator Prof. Philippe Sands QC, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal Ms. Mercedes Cordido-Freytes de Kurowski Assistant to the Tribunal Dr. Katherine Simpson Date of Dispatch to the Parties: November 30, 2017 REPRESENTATION OF THE PARTIES Representing Bear Creek Mining Corporation: Representing the Republic of Peru: Mr. Henry G. Burnett, Mr. Ricardo Ampuero Llerena Mr. Craig Miles, Comisión Especial que Representa al Estado Ms. Caline Mouawad, en Controversias Internacionales de Inversión Mr. Cedric Soule, Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Mr. Fernando Rodríguez-Cortina, Jr. Cuzco 177 Ms. Eldy Quintanilla Roché, Lima Ms. Jessica Beess und Chrostin Republic of Peru. Mr. Luis Alonso Navarro, and Ms. Verónica García and King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas Dr. Stanimir A. Alexandrov New York, N.Y. 10036-4003 Stanimir A. Alexandrov PLLC United States of America 1501 K Street, N.W., Suite C-072 Washington, D.C. 20005 and United States of America Mr. Luis Miranda Alzamora and and Ms. Cristina Ferraro Delgado Miranda & Amado Abogados Ms. Marinn Carlson and Av. Larco 1301 piso 20, Ms. Jennifer Haworth McCandless Torre Parque Mar Sidley Austin LLP Miraflores, Lima 18 1501 K Street, N.W. Republic of Peru Washington, D.C. 20005 United States of America and Mr. Juan Pazos Battistini and Mr. Ricardo Puccio Sala Estudio Navarro & Pazos Abogados Av. Del Parque 195 Lima 27 Republic of Peru ICSID ARB/14/21 i Table of Contents GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS ...................................................................................................... VI DRAMATIS PERSONAE ..................................................................................................................... VIII I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. THE DISPUTE AND THE PARTIES ............................................................................................ 1 B. THE TRIBUNAL’S TERMINOLOGY AND REASONING ............................................................. 1 II. THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL ........................................................................................................ 2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 3 IV. THE PARTIES’ REQUESTS ........................................................................................................ 18 A. CLAIMANT’S REQUESTS ....................................................................................................... 18 B. RESPONDENT’S REQUESTS ................................................................................................... 20 V. STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................. 21 A. SUMMARY OF FACTS BASED ON THE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS ........................................... 21 B. SUMMARY OF FACTS PRESENTED BY AMICI AND PARTIES’ RESPONSES .......................... 53 1. Summary of Facts Presented by DHUMA and Dr. López........................................... 53 2. Claimant’s Response to Amici Submission and Tribunal’s Question (a) .................. 58 3. Respondent’s Response to Amici Submission and Tribunal’s Question (a) .............. 67 VI. APPLICABLE LAW ...................................................................................................................... 77 VII. JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL ....................................................................................... 78 A. WHETHER AN INVESTMENT CONFERRING JURISDICTION ON THE TRIBUNAL EXISTS .... 83 1. Respondent’s Arguments ................................................................................................ 83 2. Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................................... 84 3. The Tribunal’s Reasoning .............................................................................................. 86 B. WHETHER CLAIMANT HELD THE RIGHTS ON WHICH IT BASES ITS CLAIM .................... 87 1. Respondent’s Arguments ................................................................................................ 87 2. Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................................... 88 3. The Tribunal’s Reasoning .............................................................................................. 91 C. THE LEGAL STANDARD: WHETHER LEGALITY OR GOOD FAITH IS A PREREQUISITE TO THE TRIBUNAL’S EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION ................................................................... 92 1. Respondent’s Arguments ................................................................................................ 92 2. Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................................... 96 3. The Tribunal’s Reasoning ............................................................................................ 101 VIII. ADMISSIBILITY OF CLAIMANT’S CLAIMS ....................................................................... 102 A. RESPONDENT’S ARGUMENTS ............................................................................................. 102 ICSID ARB/14/21 ii B. CLAIMANT’S ARGUMENTS .................................................................................................. 104 C. THE TRIBUNAL’S REASONING ............................................................................................ 105 IX. THE MERITS ............................................................................................................................... 105 A. WHETHER RESPONDENT EXPROPRIATED CLAIMANT’S INVESTMENT IN THE SANTA ANA CONCESSION ........................................................................................................................ 105 1. Arguments from the Government of Canada and Party Responses......................... 107 2. Whether Supreme Decree 032 Effected an Indirect Expropriation ......................... 109 (a) Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................. 109 (i) Arguments Related to Annex 812.1(b) ............................................................ 109 (ii) Arguments Related to Annex 812.1(c) and the Tribunal’s Questions (c) and (f) .. ..................................................................................................................... 110 (b) Respondent’s Arguments .............................................................................. 116 (i) Arguments Related to Annex 812.1(b) ............................................................ 116 (ii) Arguments Related to Annex 812.1(c) and the Tribunal’s Questions (c) and (f) .. ..................................................................................................................... 116 (c) The Tribunal’s Reasoning ............................................................................. 122 (i) Examination of the “factors” provided by Annex 812.1 FTA ..................... 123 (ii) Summary of the Factual Circumstances leading to Supreme Decree 032 ... 124 (iii) Legal Evaluation ......................................................................................... 126 (iv) Did Claimant’s Involvement of Ms. Villavicencio Justify the Derogation of Decree 083? ...................................................................................................... 127 (v) Did the Social Unrest Justify the Derogation of Supreme Decree 083? ..... 135 (vi) Conclusion regarding the indirect expropriation ......................................... 143 3. Whether Supreme Decree 032 Effected a Direct Expropriation ............................... 143 (a) Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................. 143 (b) Respondent’s Arguments .............................................................................. 146 (c) The Tribunal’s Reasoning ............................................................................. 147 4. Whether Supreme Decree 032 was Lawful under Article 812 of the FTA ............... 148 (a) Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................. 148 (b) Respondent’s Arguments .............................................................................. 153 (c) The Tribunal’s Reasoning ............................................................................. 154 5. Whether Supreme Decree 032 was a Valid Exercise of Police Powers ..................... 155 (a) Claimant’s Arguments .................................................................................. 155 (b) Respondent’s Arguments .............................................................................. 160 (c) The Tribunal’s Reasoning ............................................................................. 166 B. WHETHER RESPONDENT AFFORDED CLAIMANT FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT . 168 ICSID ARB/14/21 iii 1. Whether Respondent Afforded Claimant Fair and Equitable Treatment as Required by the FTA ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Interrelation and Regional Patterning in the Department of Puno, Southern Peru Jean Morisset
    Document généré le 30 sept. 2021 04:15 Cahiers de géographie du Québec Urban interrelation and regional patterning in the department of Puno, Southern Peru Jean Morisset Volume 20, numéro 49, 1976 Résumé de l'article Le département de Puno s'inscrit autour du lac Titicaca (3 800 m au-dessus du URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/021311ar niveau de la mer) pour occuper un vaste plateau (l'altiplano) ainsi que les DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/021311ar hautes chaînes andines (la puna) et; déborder au nord vers le bassin amazonien (la selva). Aller au sommaire du numéro En utilisant à la fois des informations recueillies lors d'enquêtes sur le terrain et des données de recensement (1940 et 1961), cet essai poursuit un double objectif: on a tenté d'analyser d'une part, l'évolution et l'interdépendance des Éditeur(s) principaux centres du département de Puno pour proposer, d'autre part, une régionalisation à partir des structures géo-spatiales et des organisations Département de géographie de l'Université Laval administratives. De plus, on a brièvement traité de la nature des agglomérations et on a réalisé une analyse quantitative ISSN regroupant 30 variables reportées sur les 85 districts du département. 0007-9766 (imprimé) L'auteur conclut en suggérant que toute planification est un processus qui doit 1708-8968 (numérique) aboutir à un compromis entre des composantes spatio-économiques (planificaciôn tecno-crética) et des composantes socio-culturelles (planificaciôn Découvrir la revue de base). Citer cet article Morisset, J. (1976). Urban interrelation and regional patterning in the department of Puno, Southern Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • El Bien Común Como Perspectiva52
    GUÍACINCO Guías temáticas Reformas clave para un Estado en buen estado ◗ Ética parlamentaria. El bien común como perspectiva Colección Agenda Integridad TRANSPARENCIA Guías temáticas Reformas clave para un Estado en buen estado u Guía cinco Ética parlamentaria. El bien común como perspectiva © Transparencia Av. Belén 389 San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú Teléfonos: (511) 441-3234, 441-3995, 441-3916 Fax: (511) 221-7265 www.transparencia.org.pe E-mail: [email protected] Elaboración y edición general: Asociación Civil Transparencia. Textos de Jaime Márquez y Elsa Bardález (editora general) Corrección de estilo y cuidado de edición: Fortunata Barrios Diseño, diagramación y carátula: Claudia Sarmiento Impresión: Art & Color E.I.R.L. Primera edición: Lima, junio de 2008 ISBN: Hecho el Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú No Todos los derechos reservados. Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de este documento, con propósitos no comerciales, siempre y cuando se otorguen los créditos respectivos a Transparencia. Esta publicación ha sido posible gracias al apoyo brindado por el Fondo Ítalo Peruano (FIP) en el marco del proyecto Agenda por la integridad institucional: Un Estado para la ciudadanía. Índice GUÍA CINCO Presentación 5 Introducción 7 1 Situación actual de la ética parlamentaria en el Perú 11 1.1 Imagen del Congreso y la ética parlamentaria 12 1.2 Avances en la regulación de la ética pública 16 1.3 Las faltas éticas más comunes en el escenario parlamentario 18 2 Regulación de la ética parlamentaria 21 2.1 La
    [Show full text]
  • Aprista Elías Rodríguez
    JUANPONCE/ARCHI~ Elvlcemlnistro Gonzáles descarta renunciar por denuncia fiscal 7 ¯ Fiscalía anticorrupción de Tumbes pide nueve años de cárcel para alto funcionario del Minag por presunto Poneen el tapele delito de colusión agravada, la necesith«t tic conl int~:.w i ción d ele lis calía, Gorgáles Hi- revisando (,IO~,\NNA(ASlANEI)AI. dalgo es acusado de haber be- designaciones". neficiado auna empresa en li- Uno de los anuncios para citaciones por más de 683 mil Salvador 1 leix.si luchar contra la corrupción soles cuando fue presidente Congresista de PPK que hizo el presidente Pe- de la Comisión de Licitación dro Pablo Kuczynski, hace de Obras de la Municipalidad algunos días, fue que había Provincial deTumbes. pedido a sus ministros que "Elministro [JoséManuel evalúeu "de inmediato" su Hernández] claro que sí sa- entorno mas cercano para b¤a de este caso", respondió garanuzarque contaban con elviceministro a El Comer- Juan Callos Gonz,’íles Hidalgo se desempefia como viceminLstro de Políticas Agradas. las personas idóneas. cio, desde Puerto Maldo- MÁS INFORMACIÓN En este contexto, un co- nado. ’%% le comenté al mo- "No existe ninguna ac- gó que, por este pedido de la gundavuelta, estaversión ha municado de la fiscalía aler- mento de ingresar a trabajar HOJADEVIDA ción mía para que demues- fiscalía, vaya a renunciar a sido negada. Elparlamenta- t6 ayer de un alto funciona- con él", agregó. Elvieeministro Juan Carlos tren colusión¯ En ninguna su cargo en el Ministerio de rio CésarV’fllanuevarechaz6 rio del Ministerio de Agri- Según las investigaciones Gonzáles Hidalgo es abo- parte han demostrado eso.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Nacional De San Agustín Escuela De Posgrado Unidad De Posgrado De La Facultad De Filosofía Y Humanidades
    Universidad Nacional de San Agustín Escuela de Posgrado Unidad de Posgrado de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades ANÁLISIS PRAGMÁTICO DE LA DESCORTESÍA VERBAL EN LOS DEBATES PARLAMENTARIOS Y SUS REPERCUSIONES EN LA IMAGEN DEL CONGRESO. CASO DE ESTUDIO: DISCURSOS PERIODO ANUAL DE SESIONES AÑO 2012 AL 2018, AREQUIPA - 2018 Tesis presentada por el bachiller: ESPINOZA BELTRAME, JOSE MIGUEL Para optar el Grado Académico de: Maestro en Ciencias: Lingüística Aplicada Asesor: Dr. Ubaldo Enríquez Aguirre AREQUIPA - PERÚ 2019 Dedicamos esta tesis a Dios, quien guió nuestro espíritu para la conclusión de esta tesis. A mi familia, quienes fueron una motivación constante para alcanzar mis propósitos. A nuestros compañeros de estudio, a nuestros maestros y amigos, quienes sin su ayuda nunca hubiéramos podido hacer esta tesis. ii A los docentes de mi alma mater Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, por su apoyo y estímulo brindado todos los días durante mis estudios profesionales. iii RESUMEN La investigación tuvo como objetivo general determinar el grado de repercusión de las estrategias de descortesía verbal utilizadas por los congresistas durante los debates parlamentarios en la imagen del congreso Caso de estudio: Discursos periodo anual de sesiones 2017, Arequipa 2018. Se trata de una investigación de tipo descriptiva correlacional, con un diseño no experimental y con una muestra de 32 enunciados que fueron analizadas de acuerdo a las rúbricas de evaluación, el estadístico que se utilizó para la validación de la hipótesis fue el Pearson por tener valores cuantitativos. Los resultados obtenidos nos muestran que existe relación significativa entre las estrategias de descortesía verbal que utilizan los parlamentarios en los debates políticos con la mala imagen que proyecta el congreso de la república en la sociedad.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Filtration of Helminth Eggs and Coliforms from Municipal Sewage for Agricultural Reuse in Peru
    Bio-filtration of helminth eggs and coliforms from municipal sewage for agricultural reuse in Peru Rosa Elena Yaya Beas Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr G. Zeeman Personal chair at the Sub-department of Environmental Technology Wageningen University Prof. Dr J.B. van Lier Professor of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Irrigation Delft University of Technology Co-promotor Dr K. Kujawa-Roeleveld Lecturer at the Sub-department of Environmental Technology Wageningen University Other members Dr N. Hofstra, Wageningen University Prof. Dr M.H. Zwietering, Wageningen University Prof. Dr C.A. de Lemos Chernicharo, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil Dr M. Ronteltap, UNESCO-IHE, Delft This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School of SENSE (Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment). II Bio-filtration of helminth eggs and coliforms from municipal sewage for agricultural reuse in Peru Rosa Elena Yaya Beas Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Wednesday 20 January 2016 at 1.30 p.m. in the Aula. III Rosa Elena Yaya Beas Bio-filtration of helminth eggs and coliforms from municipal sewage for agricultural reuse in Peru 198 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2016) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978-94-6173-494-5 IV V Abstract Where fresh water resources are scarce, treated wastewater becomes an attractive alternative for agricultural irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Probability in South American Protected Areas
    Technical Note Fire probability in South American Protected Areas August to October 2020 South American authors: Liana O. Anderson, João B. C. dos Reis, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Galia Selaya, Luiz Aragão UK authors: Chantelle Burton, Philip Bett, Chris Jones, Karina Williams, Inika Taylor, Andrew Wiltshire August 2020 1 HOW TO CITE THIS WORK ANDERSON Liana O.; BURTON Chantelle; DOS REIS João B. C.; PESSÔA Ana C. M.; SELAYA Galia; BETT Philip, JONES Chris, WILLIAMS Karina; TAYLOR Inika; WILTSHIRE, Andrew, ARAGÃO Luiz. Fire probability in South American Protected Areas: August to October 2020. 16p. São José dos Campos, 2020.SEI/Cemaden process: 01250.029118/2018-78/5761326. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13727.79523 Contact: [email protected] Institutions Met Office Hadley Centre – United Kingdom Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais - Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Brazil This Technical Note was prepared with the support of the following projects: CSSP-BRAZIL - Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) Brazil. Fund: Newton Fund MAP-FIRE – Multi-Actor Adaptation Plan to cope with Forests under Increasing Risk of Extensive fires Fund: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI-SGP-HW 016) PRODIGY BMBF biotip Project – Process‐based & Resilience‐Oriented management of Diversity Generates sustainabilitY Fund: German BMBF biotip Project FKZ 01LC1824A João B. C. dos Reis and Ana C. M. Pessôa were funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 444321/2018-7 and 140977/2018-5, respectively). Luiz Aragão was funded by CNPq Productivity fellowship (305054/2016-3). Liana Anderson acknowledges EasyTelling, and the projects: CNPq (ACRE-QUEIMADAS 442650/2018-3, SEM-FLAMA 441949/2018-5), São Paulo Research Foundation – (FAPESP 19/05440-5, 2016/02018-2).
    [Show full text]
  • “Votación De La Propuesta De Conformación De La Comisión Permanente Del Congreso Señores Congresistas Que Votaron a Favor
    208 Diario de los Debates - PRIMERA LEGISLATURA ORDINARIA DE 2006 - TOMO I Partido Aprista Peruano Velásquez Quesquén, Ángel Javier Mulder Bedoya, Claudio Mauricio Balta Salazar, María Helvezia Carrasco Távara, José Carlos Macedo Sánchez, José Calderón Castro, Wilder Félix Unidad Nacional Bedoya de Vivanco, Javier A. Pérez Monteverde, Martín Galarreta Velarde, Luis Fernando Suplentes: Lombardi Elías, Güido Ricardo Alcorta Suero, María Lourdes Canchaya Sánchez, Elsa Victoria Grupo Parlamentario Fujimorista Moyano Delgado, Martha Lupe Sousa Huanambal, Víctor Rolando Suplente: Pando Córdova, Ricardo Alianza Parlamentaria García Belaúnde, Víctor Andrés Perry Cruz, Juan David Waisman Rjavinsthi, David Lescano Ancieta, Yonhy.” “Votación de la propuesta de conformación Obregón Peralta, Ordóñez Salazar, Otárola de la Comisión Permanente del Congreso Peñaranda, Pando Córdova, Peña Angulo, Peral- ta Cruz, Pérez del Solar Cuculiza, Pérez Mon- Señores congresistas que votaron a favor: teverde, Perry Cruz, Raffo Arce, Ramos Pru- Abugattás Majluf, Acosta Zárate, Aguinaga dencio, Reátegui Flores, Rebaza Martell, Reggiar- Recuenco, Alcorta Suero, Alegría Pastor, Anaya do Barreto, Reymundo Mercado, Robles López, Oropeza, Andrade Carmona, Balta Salazar, Rodríguez Zavaleta, Salazar Leguía, Santos Bedoya de Vivanco, Benites Vásquez, Beteta Ru- Carpio, Sasieta Morales, Serna Guzmán, Silva bín, Bruce Montes de Oca, Cabrera Campos, Díaz, Sucari Cari, Sumire de Conde, Supa Hua- Cajahuanca Rosales, Canchaya Sánchez, Cánepa mán, Uribe Medina, Urtecho Medina, Vargas
    [Show full text]
  • Wildpotato Collecting Expedition in Southern Peru
    A Arner J of Potato Res (1999) 76:103-119 103 Wild Potato Collecting Expedition in Southern Peru (Departments of Apurimac, Arequipa, Cusco, Moquegua Puno, Tacna) in 1998: Taxonomy and New Genetic Resources David M. Spooner*\ Alberto Salas L6pez2,Z6simo Huaman2, and Robert J. Hijmans2 'United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706-1590. Tel: 608-262-0159; FAX: 608-262-4743; email: [email protected]) 'International Potato Center (CIP), Apartado 1558, La Molina, Lima 12, Peru. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Peruhas 103 taxa of wild potatoes (species, sub- Wild and cultivated tuber-bearing potatoes (Solanum species, varieties, and forms) according to Hawkes sect. Petota) are distributed from the southwestern United (1990; modified by us by a reduction of species in the States to south-central Chile. The latest comprehensive tax- Solanum brevicaule complex) and including taxa onomic treatment of potatoes (Hawkes, 1990) recogllized 216 described by C. Ochoa since 1989. Sixty-nine of these tuber-bearing species, with 101 taxa (here to include species, 103 taxa (67%) were unavailable from any ofthe world's subspecies, varieties and forms) from Peru. Ochoa (1989, genebanks and 85 of them (83%) had less than three 1992b, 1994a,b) described ten additional Peruvian taxa rais- germplasm accessions. We conducted a collaborative ing the total to 111. We lower this number to 103 with a mod- Peru(INIA), United States (NRSP-6), and International ification of species in the Solanum brevicaule complex. Potato Center (CIP) wild potato (Solanum sect. Petota) Sixty-nine of these 103 species (67%) were unavailable from collecting expedition in Peru to collect germplasm and any ofthe world's genebanks and 85 of them (83%) had less gather taxonomic data.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CCPR DECLARATION RE: ARTICLE 41 9 April 1984 Peru
    PERU CCPR DECLARATION RE: ARTICLE 41 9 April 1984 Peru recognizes the competence of the Human Rights Committee to receive and consider communications to the effect that a State Party claims that another State Party is not fulfilling its obligations under the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in accordance with article 41 of the said Covenant. DEROGATIONS: NOTIFICATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 4 (3) OF THE COVENANT 22 March 1983 (Dated 18 March 1983) First notification: The Government has declared the extension of the state of emergency in the provinces of Huanta, La Mar, Cangallo, Victor Fajardo y Huamanga, in the Department of Ayacucho, Andahuaylas in the Department of Apurímac, and Angaraes, Tayacaja and Acobamba in the Department of Huancavelica and for a period of 60 days from the date of the issue of the Supreme Decree No. 003-83-IN of 25 February 1983. Suspension of the constitutional guarantees provided for in paragraphs 7, 9, 10 and 20 (g) of article 2 of the Political Constitution of Peru, which relate to the inviolability of the home, liberty of movement in the national territory, the right of peaceful assembly and the right to liberty and security of person. In a communication received by the Secretary-General on 4 April 1983, the Government of Peru specified that the state of emergency extended by Supreme Decree No. 003-83-IN of 25 February 1983 was originally proclaimed by Supreme Decree No. 026-81-IN of 12 October 1981. It further specified that the provisions of the Covenant from which it was derogated by reason of the proclamation of the state of emergency were articles 9, 12, 17 and 21.
    [Show full text]
  • REX-002 Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa October 6
    REX-002 Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa October 6, 2015 English Translation UNDER THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation Claimant, v. Republic of Peru Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21 OPINION OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY OF LAW EXPERT ANTONIO ALFONSO PEÑA JUMPA OCTOBER 6, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 II. THE AYMARA COMUNIDADES CAMPESINAS OF THE PERUVIAN SOUTH ANDES: PUNO REGION ...................................................................................................5 A. Main Economic Activities of the Aymara Comunidades Campesinas of Puno ......7 B. Social And Political Organization of the Aymara Comunidades Campesinas of Puno .....................................................................................................................9 C. The Cultural Organization of the Aymara Communities of Puno .........................12 D. Recognized Rights of the Aymara Communities of Puno .....................................14 1. Special Treatment of Rights at the National Level ....................................14 2. Special Treatment of Rights at the International Level .............................16 III. THE AYMARA COMUNIDADES CAMPESINAS AND THE TRANS-COMMUNAL CONFLICT OF THE SANTA ANA MINING PROJECT ...............................................19 A. Understanding the Nature of the Conflicts in the Aymara Communities
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Funding Landscape for Biodiversity Conservation in Peru
    MAPPING THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN PERU BY KATIA SOFIA NAKAMURA LAM THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Assistant Professor Daniel C. Miller, Adviser Associate Professor Richard Brazee Dr. Anthony Waldron, National University of Singapore ABSTRACT Financial resources are crucial to effective biodiversity conservation. Globally, research shoWs that conservation-related eXpenditures are directed toWards countries of high biodiversity importance, even as funding floWs are Well beloW estimates of financial need. The absence of sufficient funding makes the effective and efficient use of the available resources even more imperative. Empirical evidence on previous funding floWs is necessary to develop a baseline for comparison, identification of funding gaps, and assessment of ultimate impacts. To date, hoWever, knoWledge of the distribution of funding Within countries remains very limited. This study, therefore, analyzes the conservation funding landscape in Peru, a mega-diverse country, to shed light on the nature and trends of support for biodiversity and the factors shaping funding allocation at the sub-national level. I carried out desk-based and field research to collect as much data as possible on conservation finance in Peru from 2009, the year the Peruvian Ministry of the Environment Was founded, to 2015, the last year for which full data were available. Information collected covered a range of public and private, domestic and international sources. Overall, I found that 19% of the funding for conservation in Peru derived from domestic sources and 81% from international ones during the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Autorizan Transferencia De Partidas Del Ministerio De Salud a Favor Del
    Autorizan Transferencia de Partidas del Ministerio de Salud a favor del Gobierno Regional del Departamento de Piura y Gobiernos Locales para desarrollar Proyectos de Inversión Pública durante el Año Fiscal 2012 DECRETO SUPREMO Nº 084-2012-EF EL PRESIDENTE DE LA REPÚBLICA CONSIDERANDO: Que, mediante la Ley Nº 29812, Ley de Presupuesto del Sector Público para el Año Fiscal 2012, se aprobó, entre otros, el Presupuesto del Pliego 011 Ministerio de Salud; Que, el numeral 11.1 del artículo 11º de la Ley N° 29812, Ley de Presupuesto del Sector Público para el Año Fiscal 2012, establece que los recursos públicos asignados en los presupuestos institucionales de las entidades del Gobierno Nacional para la ejecución de proyectos de inversión en los gobiernos regionales o los gobiernos locales se transfieren bajo la modalidad de modificación presupuestaria en el nivel institucional, aprobada mediante Decreto Supremo refrendado por el Ministro del sector correspondiente y el Ministro de Economía y Finanzas, previa suscripción de convenio; Que, el Ministerio de Salud, a través de los Informes N° 105-2012-OGPP-OPI/MINSA y N° 131-2012- OGPPOP/ MINSA de su Oficina General de Planeamiento y Presupuesto, informa que de acuerdo a la proyección de ejecución de su presupuesto institucional al cierre del año fiscal, en las partidas de gastos orientadas al financiamiento de proyectos de inversión pública, se estima una disponibilidad presupuestaria que permitiría financiar cinco proyectos de inversión pública prioritarios para el Sector Salud: “Construcción
    [Show full text]