DOCSLIB.ORG

Respondent's Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Respondent's Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation Claimant, v. Republic of Perú Respondent. Case No. ARB/14/21 Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction April 13, 2016 Counsel for Respondent: Stanimir A. Alexandrov Juan Pazos Marinn Carlson Ricardo Puccio Sala Jennifer Haworth McCandless Navarro & Pazos Abogados Sidley Austin LLP Av. Del Parque 195 San Isidro 1501 K Street, N.W. Lima, Perú Washington, D.C. 20005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Factual Background .............................................................................................................9 A. Bear Creek’s (Lack of) Experience..........................................................................9 B. Bear Creek Unlawfully Acquired the Santa Ana Concessions ..............................17 1. Perú’s Constitution Prohibits Any Direct or Indirect Acquisition of Mines Within 50 km of Perú’s Borders ................................................................19 2. Bear Creek Violated Article 71 of the Peruvian Constitution ...................28 3. Foreign Investors in Perú’s Border Zones Successfully Follow Proper Procedures under Article 71, and Bear Creek’s Purported Counter- Examples Are Not Comparable .................................................................39 4. Bear Creek Does Not Succeed in Its Search for Validation of Its Circumvention of Perú’s Constitution .......................................................54 5. Conclusion on Bear Creek’s Unlawful Acquisition of the Santa Ana Concessions................................................................................................60 C. Bear Creek Did Not Have the Support of the Local Communities That Is Necessary to Construct or Operate a Mine ............................................................61 1. A “Social License” from Affected Communities Is an Essential Component of Any Mining Project............................................................62 2. Bear Creek Can Only Claim Any “Support” by Inappropriately Narrowing the Scope of the Relevant Communities to Those That Supported the Project .................................................................................76 3. The DGAAM and MINEM Did Not Approve or Endorse Bear Creek’s Social Outreach Efforts ..............................................................................89 D. The Surrounding Communities Opposed the Santa Ana Project, Leading to Massive Protests That Paralyzed the Region .........................................................96 1. Bear Creek Failed to Work With All of Its Neighboring Communities ....99 i 2. After Warning Signs in Prior Months, in October 2008 Thousands Protested Against the Santa Ana Project and the Company’s Site Was Sacked and Burned ..................................................................................107 3. The February 2011 Public Hearing and Large-Scale Protests Outside It Confirmed That Many in the Surrounding Communities Rejected the Santa Ana Project .....................................................................................113 4. The Protests in March-June 2011 that Paralyzed the Department of Puno Targeted the Santa Ana Project................................................................118 5. If Bear Creek Were To Return Today, the Local Communities Would Again Reject the Santa Ana Project .........................................................130 E. The Government Worked in Good Faith to Quell and Address All of the Causes of the Protests .......................................................................................................132 1. Perú Attempted To Calm the Social Uprising Through Dialogue with the Protestors..................................................................................................133 2. Perú Enacted Many Measures to Respond to the Social Crisis, Not Just the Two Measures of Which Bear Creek Complains ....................................141 F. Both the Temporary Suspension of the Review of Bear Creek’s EIA and Supreme Decree No. 032 Were Appropriate, Legitimate, and Proportional Measures ......144 1. The Temporary Suspension of the EIA Review So That It Could Proceed in Calmer Times Was Legal, Reasonable, and Appropriate ....................145 2. Supreme Decree No. 032 Was a Legitimate and Proportional Response to the Massive Regional Protests and the Revelation that Bear Creek Had Unlawfully Acquired the Santa Ana Concessions ...................................151 G. Alleged Statements by Peruvian Officials Trying to Find a Solution to the Company’s Problem Do Nothing to Prove Bear Creek’s Case ...........................163 H. Bear Creek Cannot Show that, But For Supreme Decree No. 032, the Santa Ana Project Would Have Proceeded to the Extraction Phase, Much Less Would Have Been a Successful Mine .......................................................................................165 1. Bear Creek Had to Overcome Many More Legal Hurdles Before It Could Ever Have Constructed a Mine or Exploited Silver at Santa Ana ...........169 2. Other Stalled Mining Projects in Perú Illustrate the Uncertainties of Mine Project Development, Including for Reasons Unrelated to Government Measures ..................................................................................................198 III. The Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction to Hear Claimant’s Claims...........................................204 ii A. Investment Treaty Arbitration and the ICSID Arbitral Process Do Not Protect Unlawful Investments or Those Made in Bad Faith ............................................206 1. Investments That Are Made in Violation of the Law of the Host State Are Not Protected ...........................................................................................206 2. Investments That Are Made in Bad Faith Are Not Protected ..................217 B. Claimant Obtained the Santa Ana Concessions Illegally and in Bad Faith, and Therefore Claimant Has No Right to the Protections Contained in the Perú- Canada FTA .........................................................................................................221 C. Conclusion on Unlawful and Bad Faith Investments ..........................................226 D. Respondent Is Not Estopped from Asserting in These Proceedings that Claimant Obtained the Santa Ana Concessions Unlawfully ...............................................227 1. Respondent Became Aware of Claimant’s Illegal Scheme Only in 2011 and Claimant Has Not Established Any of the Elements of Estoppel .....228 2. Claimant’s Appeal to Peruvian Law Is Irrelevant....................................238 E. Claimant’s Violations of Peruvian Law Invalidate Its Claimed Investment at Santa Ana .......................................................................................................................238 F. The Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction Because Claimant Does Not Own the Investments Upon Which It Bases Its Claim .......................................................239 IV. Perú Did Not Breach the FTA .........................................................................................241 A. Supreme Decree No. 032 Did Not Expropriate Claimant’s Investment in the Santa Ana Concession ...................................................................................................241 1. Supreme Decree No. 032 Is a Legitimate Exercise of Respondent’s Police Powers ......................................................................................................242 2. Claimant Cannot Meet the Heightened Standard for Indirect Expropriation Under Annex 812.1 of the FTA ...............................................................257 3. Claimant Possessed Limited Rights at Santa Ana, and Respondent Could Not Have Expropriated Rights That Claimant Never Held .....................266 4. Conclusion on Expropriation ...................................................................268 B. Respondent Afforded Claimant Fair and Equitable Treatment in Accordance with the FTA ................................................................................................................269 iii 1. The FTA Does Not Guarantee Fair and Equitable Treatment Beyond the International Minimum Standard of Treatment, Which Places a High Burden on Claimant .................................................................................270 2. Claimant Has Not Identified a Principle of Customary International Law Regarding Fair and Equitable Treatment That Respondent Allegedly Violated ....................................................................................................279 3. Claimant’s FET Claim Fails Because It Cannot Prove that Respondent’s Actions Fell Below the International Minimum Standard for Fair and Equitable Treatment .................................................................................282 4. Claimant Cannot Import an Autonomous FET Standard Into the FTA ...291 C. Respondent Did Not Violate Other Provisions of the FTA .................................298 1. Respondent Afforded Claimant Full Protection and Security in Accordance with the FTA ........................................................................298 2. The FTA Contains No Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures Clause, and Claimant Cannot Import Such a Clause from Another Treaty ..........304
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fire Probability in South American Protected Areas
    Technical Note Fire probability in South American Protected Areas August to October 2020 South American authors: Liana O. Anderson, João B. C. dos Reis, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Galia Selaya, Luiz Aragão UK authors: Chantelle Burton, Philip Bett, Chris Jones, Karina Williams, Inika Taylor, Andrew Wiltshire August 2020 1 HOW TO CITE THIS WORK ANDERSON Liana O.; BURTON Chantelle; DOS REIS João B. C.; PESSÔA Ana C. M.; SELAYA Galia; BETT Philip, JONES Chris, WILLIAMS Karina; TAYLOR Inika; WILTSHIRE, Andrew, ARAGÃO Luiz. Fire probability in South American Protected Areas: August to October 2020. 16p. São José dos Campos, 2020.SEI/Cemaden process: 01250.029118/2018-78/5761326. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13727.79523 Contact: [email protected] Institutions Met Office Hadley Centre – United Kingdom Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais - Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Brazil This Technical Note was prepared with the support of the following projects: CSSP-BRAZIL - Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) Brazil. Fund: Newton Fund MAP-FIRE – Multi-Actor Adaptation Plan to cope with Forests under Increasing Risk of Extensive fires Fund: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI-SGP-HW 016) PRODIGY BMBF biotip Project – Process‐based & Resilience‐Oriented management of Diversity Generates sustainabilitY Fund: German BMBF biotip Project FKZ 01LC1824A João B. C. dos Reis and Ana C. M. Pessôa were funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 444321/2018-7 and 140977/2018-5, respectively). Luiz Aragão was funded by CNPq Productivity fellowship (305054/2016-3). Liana Anderson acknowledges EasyTelling, and the projects: CNPq (ACRE-QUEIMADAS 442650/2018-3, SEM-FLAMA 441949/2018-5), São Paulo Research Foundation – (FAPESP 19/05440-5, 2016/02018-2).
    [Show full text]
  • REX-002 Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa October 6
    REX-002 Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa October 6, 2015 English Translation UNDER THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation Claimant, v. Republic of Peru Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21 OPINION OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY OF LAW EXPERT ANTONIO ALFONSO PEÑA JUMPA OCTOBER 6, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 II. THE AYMARA COMUNIDADES CAMPESINAS OF THE PERUVIAN SOUTH ANDES: PUNO REGION ...................................................................................................5 A. Main Economic Activities of the Aymara Comunidades Campesinas of Puno ......7 B. Social And Political Organization of the Aymara Comunidades Campesinas of Puno .....................................................................................................................9 C. The Cultural Organization of the Aymara Communities of Puno .........................12 D. Recognized Rights of the Aymara Communities of Puno .....................................14 1. Special Treatment of Rights at the National Level ....................................14 2. Special Treatment of Rights at the International Level .............................16 III. THE AYMARA COMUNIDADES CAMPESINAS AND THE TRANS-COMMUNAL CONFLICT OF THE SANTA ANA MINING PROJECT ...............................................19 A. Understanding the Nature of the Conflicts in the Aymara Communities
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Funding Landscape for Biodiversity Conservation in Peru
    MAPPING THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN PERU BY KATIA SOFIA NAKAMURA LAM THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Assistant Professor Daniel C. Miller, Adviser Associate Professor Richard Brazee Dr. Anthony Waldron, National University of Singapore ABSTRACT Financial resources are crucial to effective biodiversity conservation. Globally, research shoWs that conservation-related eXpenditures are directed toWards countries of high biodiversity importance, even as funding floWs are Well beloW estimates of financial need. The absence of sufficient funding makes the effective and efficient use of the available resources even more imperative. Empirical evidence on previous funding floWs is necessary to develop a baseline for comparison, identification of funding gaps, and assessment of ultimate impacts. To date, hoWever, knoWledge of the distribution of funding Within countries remains very limited. This study, therefore, analyzes the conservation funding landscape in Peru, a mega-diverse country, to shed light on the nature and trends of support for biodiversity and the factors shaping funding allocation at the sub-national level. I carried out desk-based and field research to collect as much data as possible on conservation finance in Peru from 2009, the year the Peruvian Ministry of the Environment Was founded, to 2015, the last year for which full data were available. Information collected covered a range of public and private, domestic and international sources. Overall, I found that 19% of the funding for conservation in Peru derived from domestic sources and 81% from international ones during the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Annalyda Álvarez-Calderón 2009 Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... PILGRIMAGES THROUGH MOUNTAINS, DESERTS AND OCEANS: THE QUEST FOR INDIGENOUS CITIZENSHIP (PUNO 1900-1930) A Dissertation Presented By Annalyda Álvarez Calderón To The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Stony Brook University December 2009 Copyright by Annalyda Álvarez-Calderón 2009 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Annalyda Álvarez Calderón We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Brooke Larson, Ph. D. - Dissertation Advisor Professor - History Department Paul Gootenberg, Ph. D. – Chairperson of Defense Professor - History Department Ian Roxborough, Ph. D. Professor - Sociology Department Sinclair Thomson, Ph. D. Associate Professor - History Department New York University This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Pilgrimages through mountains, deserts and oceans: The quest for indigenous citizenship (Puno 1900-1930) by Annalyda Álvarez Calderón Doctor in Philosophy In History Stony Brook University 2009 At the dawn of the twentieth century, the initiative of a group of peasants from the province of Chucuito (Department of Puno, Southeastern Peru) produced a wave of peasant mobilization that shook the control hacendados had over the area establishing an unprecedented dialogue with the state. Peruvian peasants historically have been denied a political role in the nation: their political contributions being reduced to violent revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacha Naka Jaro Joira (Aymara), Quinoa Amarga De Grano Grande (Span.), Collected: July 29, 1985
    PI 510532 to 510551-continued PI 510540 donor id: RB-58. origin: Peru, local name: Jacha Naka Jaro Joira (Aymara), Quinoa Amarga de Grano Grande (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Chatuma Community, Pomata District, Chucuito Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 17 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 17 min. W. remarks: Sown in October, harvested in March. Small bitter husk, used as principle ingredient in a medicated plaster for broken bones. Cooked as porridge, sometimes with lime. Producer: Juana Flores Mamani. cold tolerance: Frost resistant. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510541 donor id: RB-59. origin: Peru, local name: Jacha Naka Jancco Jorra (Aymara), Quinoa Sajama; Quinoa Blanca de Grano Grande (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Chatuma Community, Pomata District, Chucuito Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 17 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 17 min, W. remarks: Stems grow to 1.0m tall. Sown in October, harvested in March, in frost protected areas. Sweet in taste. Not frost resistant. Producer: Juana Flores Mamani. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510542 donor id: RB-65. origin: Peru, local name: Villa Juira (Aymara), Quinoa Rojo (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Molloko Community, Acora District, Puno Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 0 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 47 min. W. elevation: 3810m. remarks: Sown in November, harvested in March or April, in frost protected areas. Locale has cool summers and variable rainfall. Not frost resistant. Producer: Lorenzo Pari. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510543 donor id: RB-70. origin: Peru, local name: Kello Juira (Aymara), Quinoa Amarillo (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Molloko Community, Acora District, Puno Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. General Information 2. Needs Assessment
    Reference: 2011/00364/RQ/01/01 17/03/2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION – ECHO SINGLE FORM FOR HUMANITARIAN AID ACTIONS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION FAO 1.2 Title of the Action Preparedness and risk reduction in response to extreme climate events and water supply problems in vulnerable communities of the Peruvian - Bolivian highlands. 1.3 Area of intervention (country, region, localities) World Area Countries Region America BOLIVIA La Paz & Oruro America PERU Puno 1.4 Start date of the Action Start date 18/04/2011 If the Action has already started explain the reason that justifies this situation (urgent Action or other reason) 1.5 Duration of the Action in months 18 months 0 days 1.6 Start date for eligibility of expenditure Is the start date for eligibility of expenditure equal to the date of submission of the initial proposal? No If yes, explain expenses charged to the budget between date of initial proposal submission and start date of the action If no, enter the start date for eligibility and explain 18/03/2011 Submission is 17 January 2011, start date of the Action is 18 March 2011; no expenses will be charged prior to the start date. 1.7 Requested funding modalities for this agreement In case of 100% financing, justify the request 1.8 Urgent action No 1.9 Control mechanism to be applied P 1.10 Proposal and reports Submission date of the initial proposal 17/03/2011 Purpose of this submission INITIAL PROPOSAL ECHO reference 2011/00364/RQ/01/01 Date of this submission 17/03/2011 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Statement of Luis Fernando Gala Soldevilla Vice-Minister of Mines and Energy of Peru (June 2009-July 2011)
    RWS-001 Witness Statement of Fernando Gala October 6, 2015 English Translation UNDER THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation (Claimant) vs. Republic of Peru (Respondent) ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21 Witness statement of Luis Fernando Gala Soldevilla Vice-Minister of Mines and Energy of Peru (June 2009-July 2011) October 6, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION 1. My name is Luis Fernando Gala Soldevilla and I am currently the President of the Mining Council under the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines ("MINEM"). I am a Mining Engineer from the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru with an MBA from the Graduate School of Business (Escuela Superior de Negocios para Graduados - "ESAN") in Lima, Peru. I also completed a graduate programe in Finance from the ESAN. 2. I have been with the MINEM for 14 years. I was Vice-minister of Mines from June 2009 to July 2011. In addition, I was involved in the Mining Council from 2004 to 2009 and from 2011 to the present, serving as its President from 2007 to 2008 and from 2014 to date. Moreover, I was General Director of Mining at the MINEM in 1992 and also from 1999 to 2000.1 I have a total of more than 30 years experience in mining-related areas, having also worked at the Financial Development Corporation (Corporación Financiera de Desarrollo) COFIDE (1987-2004) and at the Mining Bank of Peru (Banco Minero del Peru) (1982-1987), mainly evaluating mining projects. 1 My curriculum vita is attached to this statement in Annex 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa (English)
    REX-008 Second Expert Report of Antonio Alfonso Peña Jumpa April 13, 2016 English Translation BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation Claimant, v. Republic of Peru. Respondent Case No. ARB/14/21 SECOND REPORT OF THE EXPERT IN SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE LAW ANTONIO ALFONSO PEÑA JUMPA APRIL 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. Background of the Violent Events of the 2011 Social Conflict In the Department or Region of Puno .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Agreements and disagreements of the company Bear Creek with the communities, prior to the looting and burning of the mining camp (October 17, 2008) ........................................................................................................................ 6 B. The Looting and Burning of the Camp of the Santa Ana Project .......................... 12 C. New Agreements and Disagreements of the Company Bear Creek with the Communities After the Looting and Burning of the Camp ................................... 23 D. The Public Hearing of February 23, 2011 ............................................................ 26 E. The Santa Ana Project Was Directly Linked to the Social Crisis of Puno department in 2011 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilidade De Queimadas E Incêndios Florestais Nas Áreas Protegidas Da América Do Sul
    Nota Técnica Probabilidade de queimadas e incêndios florestais nas áreas protegidas da América do Sul Agosto a Outubro de 2020 Autores Sul Americanos: Liana O. Anderson, João B. C. dos Reis, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Galia Selaya, Luiz Aragão Autores do Reino Unido: Chantelle Burton, Philip Bett, Chris Jones, Karina Williams, Inika Taylor, Andrew Wiltshire Agosto 2020 1 COMO CITAR ESTE RELATÓRIO ANDERSON Liana O.; BURTON Chantelle; DOS REIS João B. C.; PESSÔA Ana C. M.; SELAYA Galia; BETT Philip, JONES Chris, WILLIAMS Karina; TAYLOR Inika; WILTSHIRE, Andrew, ARAGÃO Luiz. Identification of priority areas for reducing the likelihood of burning and forest fires in South America August to October 2020. 16p. São José dos Campos, 2020.SEI/Cemaden processo 01250.029118/2018-78/ 5761326. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13727.79523 Contato: [email protected] Instituições Met Office Hadley Centre – Reino Unido Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais - Brasil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Brasil Nota Técnica preparada com o suporte dos projetos: CSSP-BRAZIL - Projeto Ciência para Serviços Climáticos no Brasil (CSSP) Financiamento: Newton Fund MAP-FIRE – Multi-Actor Adaptation Plan to cope with Forests under Increasing Risk of Extensive fires Financiamento: Instituto Interamericano para Pesquisas em Mudanças Globais (IAI) (IAI-SGP-HW 016) PRODIGY BMBF biotip Project – Process‐based & Resilience‐Oriented management of Diversity Generates sustainabilitY Financiamento: German BMBF biotip Project FKZ 01LC1824A João B. C. dos Reis e Ana C. M. Pessôa foram financiados pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq - 444321/2018-7 e 140977/2018-5, respectivamente).
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Creek Mining Corporation
    INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Bear Creek Mining Corporation v. Republic of Perú (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21) AWARD Members of the Tribunal Prof. Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, President of the Tribunal Dr. Michael Pryles, Arbitrator Prof. Philippe Sands QC, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal Ms. Mercedes Cordido-Freytes de Kurowski Assistant to the Tribunal Dr. Katherine Simpson Date of Dispatch to the Parties: November 30, 2017 REPRESENTATION OF THE PARTIES Representing Bear Creek Mining Corporation: Representing the Republic of Peru: Mr. Henry G. Burnett, Mr. Ricardo Ampuero Llerena Mr. Craig Miles, Comisión Especial que Representa al Estado Ms. Caline Mouawad, en Controversias Internacionales de Inversión Mr. Cedric Soule, Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Mr. Fernando Rodríguez-Cortina, Jr. Cuzco 177 Ms. Eldy Quintanilla Roché, Lima Ms. Jessica Beess und Chrostin Republic of Peru. Mr. Luis Alonso Navarro, and Ms. Verónica García and King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas Dr. Stanimir A. Alexandrov New York, N.Y. 10036-4003 Stanimir A. Alexandrov PLLC United States of America 1501 K Street, N.W., Suite C-072 Washington, D.C. 20005 and United States of America Mr. Luis Miranda Alzamora and and Ms. Cristina Ferraro Delgado Miranda & Amado Abogados Ms. Marinn Carlson and Av. Larco 1301 piso 20, Ms. Jennifer Haworth McCandless Torre Parque Mar Sidley Austin LLP Miraflores, Lima 18 1501 K Street, N.W. Republic of Peru Washington, D.C. 20005 United States of America and Mr. Juan Pazos Battistini and Mr. Ricardo Puccio Sala Estudio Navarro & Pazos Abogados Av. Del Parque 195 Lima 27 Republic of Peru ICSID ARB/14/21 i Table of Contents GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PI 510553 to 510568-Continued PI 510557 Donor Id: RB-55. Origin: Peru, Local Name: Cheara Kara Cebada (Aymara), Cebada Pelada Negra (Span.), Collected: July 28, 1985
    PI 510553 to 510568-continued PI 510557 donor id: RB-55. origin: Peru, local name: Cheara Kara Cebada (Aymara), Cebada Pelada Negra (Span.), collected: July 28, 1985. locality: Chatuma Community, Pomata District, Chucuito Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 17 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 17 min. W. elevation: 3810m. remarks: Seeds purple, hulless. Sown in October, harvested in late March. Twenty kg harvested from one kg. Years with ordinary rainfall yield best. Eaten toasted. Producer: Domingo Gonzalo Flores. cold tolerance: Frost resistant. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510558 donor id: RB-64. origin: Peru, local name: Chile Miricano (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Molloko Community, Acora District, Puno Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 0 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 47 min. W. elevation: 3810m. remarks: Hulless. Sown in October, harvested in early April. Eaten toasted. Producer: Anastacio Charaja. cold tolerance: Frost resistant. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510559 donor id: RB-67. origin: Peru, local name: Say Rana (Aymara), Cebada con Espina (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Molloko Community, Acora District, Puno Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 0 min. S. longitude: 69 deg. 47 min. W. elevation: 3810m. remarks: Sown in late September, harvested in April and May in areas with cool summers. Five to six kg harvested from one kg. Straw used for roof thatching. Producer: Pascual Charaja. cold tolerance: Frost resistant. Cultivated. Seed. PI 510560 donor id: RB-68. origin: Peru, local name: Soyto Chile (Aymara), Cebada Chile (Span.), collected: July 29, 1985. locality: Molloko Community, Acora District, Puno Province, Puno Department, latitude: 16 deg. 0 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Titicaca
    Ancient Titicaca http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=kt429019vf&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Stanish, Charles. Ancient Titicaca: The Evolution of Complex Society in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, c2003 2003. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt429019vf/ Ancient Titicaca The Evolution of Complex Society in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia CHARLES STANISH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London 2003 ― v ― [Dedication] This book is dedicated to Robert McCormick Adams, an inspiration to two generations of students at the University of Chicago and beyond. Preferred Citation: Stanish, Charles. Ancient Titicaca: The Evolution of Complex Society in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, c2003 2003. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt429019vf/ ― v ― [Dedication] This book is dedicated to Robert McCormick Adams, an inspiration to two generations of students at the University of Chicago and beyond. ― vii ― Contents List of Figures IX List of Maps XI List of Tables XIII Foreword XV 1 of 300 7/22/2006 2:12 AM Ancient Titicaca http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=kt429019vf&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preface XIX Acknowledgments XXI 1 Ancient Collasuyu 1 2 The Evolution of Political Economies 18 3 The Geography and Paleoecology of the Titicaca Basin 30 4 The Ethnography and Ethnohistory of the Titicaca Basin 44 5 The History of Archaeological Research in the Titicaca Basin 72 6 The Origins and Elaboration of Rank in the Early and Middle Formative Periods 99 7 The Rise of Competitive Peer Polities in the Upper Formative Period 137 8 The First State of Tiwanaku 165 9 The Rise of Complex Agro-Pastoral Societies in the Altiplano Period 204 10 Conquest from Outside: The Inca Occupation of the Titicaca Basin 236 11 The Evolution of Complex Society in the Titicaca Basin 278 APPENDIX: Selected Terms from the 1612 Aymara Dictionary of Ludovico Bertonio 295 Notes 301 References Cited 307 Index 331 ― ix ― Figures 1.1.
    [Show full text]