Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary Theologians ............................8 Argument of the Present Work .............................................................................11 Historiography and Methodology in Intellectual History .....................................14 ‘Seeing things their way’ ...............................................................................14 Objectivity but not neutrality .........................................................................16 Need for study of religious texts and ideas ....................................................18 Scholastic Method and Renaissance Humanism ..................................................21 Introduction ...................................................................................................21 Scholastic method defined and described ......................................................22 Renaissance humanism ..................................................................................27 Free-flowing rhetoric versus tight scholastic reasoning ...............................30 The Renaissance humanists’ Aristotle ...........................................................31 Aristotle as artifex methodi in the early modern period ...............................34 The teaching of Aristotelian logic in Reformed Basel, Strasbourg, Lausanne, and Geneva ....................................................................................................38 The role of disputations in sixteenth century Reformed pedagogy ................42 Two kinds of disputations: question and argument formats ..........................46 The Periodization of Intellectual History: Continuities and Discontinuities ........47 Broad continuity in intellectual history c. 1250 to c. 1750 ...........................47 Specific developments in rhetoric and logic in the sixteenth century ...........51 Plan of the Present Work ......................................................................................55 Outline of the Present Work .................................................................................56 Chapter 2 A Chronology of the Life and Writings of Antoine de Chandieu Introduction ...........................................................................................................59 Chandieu’s Family, Titles, and nommes de plume ...............................................61 Chandieu’s Education ...........................................................................................64 Chandieu’s Service and Travels ...........................................................................70 Chandieu’s Writings .............................................................................................76 The Structure of the Opera Theologica ................................................................95 Conclusion ............................................................................................................97 Chapter 3 The 1560s: Scholastic Method in Two Early Disputations Introduction ...........................................................................................................99 Fallacy of Origins and Genetic Fallacy ................................................................99 iv Possible Influences on Chandieu’s Method ........................................................102 La confirmation de la discipline ecclesiastique (1566) ......................................104 The Discipline ecclesiastique of 1559 .........................................................105 Context: Morély threatens the stability of the French Reformed Churches .........................................................................106 Evidences of scholastic sophistication ........................................................110 Structure of enumerated arguments, objections, and errors .......................111 A rather keen sensitivity for disputational and hermeneutical principles ...113 Contextual, philological, and grammatical arguments ...............................118 Conclusion ...................................................................................................123 Refutatio libelli quem Claudius de Sainctes (1567) ...........................................125 Historical circumstances of the Refutatio ...................................................125 Style and structure of the Refutatio .............................................................127 The arguments of the Refutatio – I. Defence of Calvin ...............................129 The arguments of the Refutatio – II. Ridiculing the Schoolmen ..................130 The arguments of the Refutatio – III. Religious orders are divisive ...........132 Medieval sources in the Refutatio ...............................................................133 Conclusion on the Refutatio ........................................................................134 Conclusion re. the 1560s .....................................................................................136 Chapter 4 The 1570s: Chandieu’s Scholastic Refutations Regarding Lawful Calling Introduction ........................................................................................................137 De Legitima vocatione pastorum Ecclesiae Reformatae (1577) ........................138 Scholastic terms to guide the reader ...........................................................139 “Common sense” enlisted in his support ....................................................142 The lengthy summarizing argument, expressed hypothetically ...................144 Sophismata F. Turriani . rectè & Theologicè disputandi (1577) ..................146 Leading the way scholastically and analytically .........................................147 Structure of the disputation .........................................................................149 Pursuit of academic precision .....................................................................152 Patristic and Medieval sources, especially Gratian ....................................154 Conclusion ...................................................................................................154 The State of Chandieu’s Scholastic Method c. 1577 ..........................................155 Claude Auberi and the Development of Chandieu’s Scholastic Method ...........157 Chandieu “revived” the precepts of the Aristotelian method .....................157 Claude Auberi and the “highly erudite Frenchmen” of Lausanne .............159 Auberi’s textbooks on early parts of the Organon .......................................161 Conclusion re. Auberi’s influence up to 1577 .............................................165 Some Conclusions re. Chandieu’s Sources of and Occasions for Scholastic Method ..............................................................................................166 Chapter 5 Prolegomenal Matters in 1580: “Theological and Scholastic” Introduction .........................................................................................................170 Choosing a Scholastic Style, not Rhetorical ......................................................171 v The Titles of the “Theological and Scholastic” Treatises ..................................173 The Programmatic Introduction to the “Theological and Scholastic” Treatises 176 Editions of the preface: 1580, 1584, and the 1592 Opera Theologica ......176 The opening letter of 1580 ...........................................................................180 The Preface: I. Theology as a Science with Principles/Axioms (1592) ......182 The Preface: II. Disputing “scholastically” ...............................................188 The Preface: III. “Disputing theologically and at the same time scholastically” .............................................................................................193 The Hermeneutical Rules from 1581 .................................................................194 Conclusion re. Chandieu’s preface
Recommended publications
  • FHISO CFPS 21: Proposal for Handling Personal Names
    CFPS 21 (Call for Papers Submission number 21) Proposal for Handling Personal Names Submitted by: Proctor, Tony Type: Technical proposal Created: 2013-03-19 Last updated: 2013-04-20 URL: Most recent version: http://fhiso.org/files/cfp/cfps21.pdf This version: http://fhiso.org/files/cfp/cfps21_v1-1.pdf Description: Proposal for Handling Personal Names Keywords: Personal-names, Culture-neutral Family History Information Standards Organisation, Inc. http://fhiso.org/ Contents 1. Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Proposal ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Name Structure ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Time Dependency ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Name Types .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Name Matching ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Sorting and Collation ................................................................................................................ 4 3. Not Covered or Not Required .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Was Shakespeare a Ramist?
    The Oxfordian Volume 22 October 2020 ISSN 1521-3641 The OXFORDIAN The Oxfordian is the peer-reviewed journal of the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship, a non-profit educational organization that conducts research and publication on the Early Modern period, William Shakespeare and the authorship of Shakespeare’s works. Founded in 1998, the journal offers research articles, essays and book reviews by academicians and independent scholars, and is published annually during the autumn. Writers interested in being published in The Oxfordian should review our publication guidelines at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship website: https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/the-oxfordian/ Our postal mailing address is: The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship PO Box 66083 Auburndale, MA 02466 USA Queries may be directed to the editor, Gary Goldstein, at [email protected] Back issues of The Oxfordian may be obtained by writing to: [email protected] 2 The OXFORDIAN Volume 22 2020 Was Shakespeare a Ramist? Reviewed by Michael Dudley The Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship. By Michael Wainwright. Palgrave Macmillan 2018 (324 pp.) in hardcover, paperback and Kindle. he question regarding the authorship of the Works of Shakespeare has for generations been dismissed by most of the intelligentsia as patent Tnonsense or a conspiracy theory—in short, as highly irrational—with a correspondingly dim view of its proponents’ intelligence and sanity. It is therefore singularly refreshing and impres- sive that a scholarly work that acknowledges Edward de Vere as Shakespeare should be entirely premised on an exploration of rationalism, not only in terms of the worldview apparent in the Shakespeare canon, but as a structured argument unto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Times (A.D
    The Catholic Faith History of Catholicism A Brief History of Catholicism (Excerpts from Catholicism for Dummies) Ancient Times (A.D. 33-741) Non-Christian Rome (33-312) o The early Christians (mostly Jews who maintained their Jewish traditions) o Jerusalem’s religious establishment tolerated the early Christians as a fringe element of Judaism o Christianity splits into its own religion . Growing number of Gentile converts (outnumbered Jewish converts by the end of the first century) . Greek and Roman cultural influences were adapted into Christianity . Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (resulted in the final and formal expulsion of the Christians from Judaism) o The Roman persecutions . The first period (A.D. 68-117) – Emperor Nero blamed Christians for the burning of Rome . The second period (A.D. 117-192) – Emperors were less tyrannical and despotic but the persecutions were still promoted . The third period (A.D. 193-313) – Persecutions were the most virulent, violent, and atrocious during this period Christian Rome (313-475) o A.D. 286 Roman Empire split between East and West . Constantinople – formerly the city of Byzantium and now present- day Istanbul . Rome – declined in power and prestige during the barbarian invasions (A.D. 378-570) while the papacy emerged as the stable center of a chaotic world o Roman Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 which legalized Christianity – it was no longer a capital crime to be Christian o A.D. 380 Christianity became the official state religion – Paganism was outlawed o The Christian Patriarchs (Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople) .
    [Show full text]
  • Metos, Merik the Vanishing Pope.Pdf
    WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY THE VANISHING POPE MERIK HUNTER METOS SPRING 2009 ADVISOR: DR. SPOHNHOLZ DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS Honors Thesis ************************* PASS WITH DISTINCTION JOSI~~ s eLf" \\)J I \%\1 )10 dW JOJ JOS!Ape S!SalH· S\;/ :383110J S~ONOH A.1IS~31\INn 3H.1 0.1 PRECIS Pope Benoit XIII (1328-1423), although an influential advocate for reforms within the Catholic Church in the middle ages, receives little attention from modem historians. Historians rarely offer more than a brief biography and often neglect to mention at all his key role in the Great Schism. Yet, the very absence ofPope Benoit XIU from most historical narratives of medieval history itself highlights the active role that historians play in determining what gets recorded. In some cases, the choices that people make in determining what does, and what does not, get included in historical accounts reveals as much about the motivations and intentions of the people recording that past as it does about their subjects. This essay studies one example of this problem, in this case Europeans during the Reformation era who self-consciously manipulated sources from medieval history to promote their own agendas. We can see this in the sixteenth-century translation ofa treatise written by the medieval theologian Nicholas de Clamanges (1363-1437. Clamanges was a university professor and served as Benoit XIII's secretary during the Great Schism in Avignon, France. The treatise, entitled La Traite de fa Ruine de f'Eglise, was written in Latin in 1398 and was first distributed after Clamanges' death in 1437.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proclaimed and Visible Word PETER H
    Word & World 7/2 (1987) Copyright © 1987 by Word & World, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, MN. All rights reserved. page 179 The Proclaimed and Visible Word PETER H. VAN NESS Union Theological Seminary, New York, New York In a recent book, Habits of the Heart, Robert Bellah and colleagues report on the current status of American individualism. As has been the case since Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, such reflections reveal an enduring feature of American social life. In Bellah’s words: “The inner tensions of American individualism add up to a classic case of ambivalence. We strongly assert the value of our self-reliance and autonomy. We deeply feel the emptiness of a life without sustaining social commitments.”1 The consequences of the American individualist credo can be loneliness, when autonomy is too greatly valued, or conformism, when a rejection of traditional authority combines with an excessive deference to contemporary peers. David Riesman coined the phrase “the lonely crowd” to describe the American social character which suffers in both of these ways.2 One of Bellah’s remedies for such social ills is the nurturing of a culture of meaning and coherence. “We need to learn again from the cultural riches of the human species and to reappropriate and revitalize those riches so that they can speak to our condition today.”3 Biblical and republican traditions stand foremost in Bellah’s list of cultural legacies in need of revitalization. Many Americans seek relief from contemporary social distress in communities of religious worship. The Christian community at worship seems to be a fitting antidote to the social ills portrayed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Histoire Du Château De Meudon. Thèse Pour Le Doctorat D'université
    HISTOIRE DU CHÂTEAU DE MEUDON ---r 1 \0 Paul BIVER HISTOIRE DU CHÂTEAU DE MEUDON LES EDITIONS DE LA TOUR GILE est le reprint d'un livre ancien, ce qui explique y Jo/qualité imparfaite de l'impression. FACULTÉ DES LETTRES DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE PARIS Histoire du Château de Meudon THÈSE POUR LE DOCTORAT D'UNIVERSITÉ PRÉSENTÉE ET SOUTENUE PAR Paul BIVER A PARIS JOUVE & Cie, ÉDITEURS 15, RUE RACINE, 15 MCMXXIII - LE CHATEAU DE MEUDON INTRODUCTION Une terrasse colossale, d'où l'on domine le cours de la Seine ; d'anciennes écuries abandonnées, des pans de murs d'une architecture élégante engagés dans le soubas- sement d'un observatoire, les margelles de quelques bassins desséchés, enfin, une orangerie de proportions imposantes, où se retrouvent tous les caractères de la Renaissance italienne : tels sont les seuls vestiges de la résidence princière de Meudon. Rien d'autre ne subsiste de cette grande œuvre d'art commencée à la Renaissance, portée à son apogée au début du XVIII siècle et terminée enfin sous le Premier Empire : le vaste château a disparu, comme ont disparu ses annexes : la grotte du Cardinal de Lorraine, l'Aile des Marronniers et le Château-Neuf du Grand Dauphin ; l'immense parc a été divisé, morcelé ; les jardins sont retour- nés à l'état de nature, ou devenus des terrains de lotisse- ment. C'est une grande perte pour le patrimoine artistique de notre pays : le château de Meudon, chef-d'œuvre du goût français sous toutes ses formes, émerveillerait les yeux des étrangers plus encore à l'heure présente qu'il ne le fit autre- fois, et il offrirait à nos artistes des modèles remarquables.
    [Show full text]
  • Surnames in Europe
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org./10.17651/ONOMAST.61.1.9 JUSTYNA B. WALKOWIAK Onomastica LXI/1, 2017 Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu PL ISSN 0078-4648 [email protected] FUNCTION WORDS IN SURNAMES — “ALIEN BODIES” IN ANTHROPONYMY (WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO POLAND) K e y w o r d s: multipart surnames, compound surnames, complex surnames, nobiliary particles, function words in surnames INTRODUCTION Surnames in Europe (and in those countries outside Europe whose surnaming patterns have been influenced by European traditions) are mostly conceptualised as single entities, genetically nominal or adjectival. Even if a person bears two or more surnames, they are treated on a par, which may be further emphasized by hyphenation, yielding the phenomenon known as double-barrelled (or even multi-barrelled) surnames. However, this single-entity approach, visible e.g. in official forms, is largely an oversimplification. This becomes more obvious when one remembers such household names as Ludwig van Beethoven, Alexander von Humboldt, Oscar de la Renta, or Olivia de Havilland. Contemporary surnames resulted from long and complicated historical processes. Consequently, certain surnames contain also function words — “alien bodies” in the realm of proper names, in a manner of speaking. Among these words one can distinguish: — prepositions, such as the Portuguese de; Swedish von, af; Dutch bij, onder, ten, ter, van; Italian d’, de, di; German von, zu, etc.; — articles, e.g. Dutch de, het, ’t; Italian l’, la, le, lo — they will interest us here only when used in combination with another category, such as prepositions; — combinations of prepositions and articles/conjunctions, or the contracted forms that evolved from such combinations, such as the Italian del, dello, del- la, dell’, dei, degli, delle; Dutch van de, van der, von der; German von und zu; Portuguese do, dos, da, das; — conjunctions, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Historical Origins of the Heidelberg Catechism
    Acta Theologica 2014 Suppl 20: 16-34 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/actat.v20i1.2S ISSN 1015-8758 © UV/UFS <http://www.ufs.ac.za/ActaTheologica> C. Strohm ON THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF THE HEIDELBERG CATECHISM ABSTRACT Reflection on the origins of the Heidelberg Catechism reveals it to be a document of understanding between Calvinistic-Reformed, Zwinglian and Lutheran-Philippistic tendencies within Protestantism. One important reason for the success of the Heidelberg Catechism was the fact that each one of these groups appreciated the Catechism. At the same time it clearly distances itself from Tridentine Catholicism and from the Gnesio-Lutheran variant of Lutheranism. This occurs mainly in the doctrine of the Lord’s Supper. The repudiation of the mass as “condemnable idolatry” is a result of the orientation to the Reformation of John Calvin. Here papal religion was seen as superstition and a fundamental violation of the true worship of God as well as an infringement of God’s honour. The experience of persecution by the Papal church in France and the Netherlands aggravated the criticism. The most famous and influential part of the Heidelberg Catechism is its first question and answer: Q. What is your only comfort in life and in death? A. That I am not my own, but belong – body and soul, in life and in death – to my faithful Savior, Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood, and has set me free from the tyranny of the devil. He also watches over me in such a way that not a hair can fall from my head without the will of my Father in heaven; in fact, all things must work together for my salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • 46 Maria Bogucka
    Acta Poloniae Historica 62, 1990 PL ISSN 0001 - 6829 Maria Bogucka MARY STUART IN LEGEND* Modern biography is increasingly more seldom satisfied with the presentation of lives of outstanding personages, but in order to fully appreciate their role it reaches out for the posthumous fortunes of its heroes. The study of legends that surround certain personalities, legends which may have little in common with their real life story and yet throughout centuries live their own lives, frequently richer than the real ones, is an exciting task. Many facts seen in this light take on new meaning ; popularity and persistence of certain threads allows one to discover the secret ways in which historical consciousness is formed, which so often has a lot in common with the subconscious, and at any rate it grows out of it. On the other hand, one happens to come across the traces of manipulating the legend, creating it out of political or religious motivations, or utilizing it for the current needs of social groups or even whole nations. One of the most famous women in history—Mary Stuart— gave birth to a legend, or more precisely speaking to two, extremely controversial legends : the white and the black one. Controversy around them goes on to this day. However, although the bibliography of works connected with the tragic fate of the * The research for this essay was completed during two stays abroad : in 1984 at Wolfenbüttel, FRG (Herzog-August-Bibliothek fellowship) and in 1988 at Wassenaar, the Netherlands (fellowship of the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Science).
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Mancelius Teoloogina Juhendatud Disputatsioonide Põhjal
    Tartu Ülikool Usuteaduskond MERLE KAND GEORG MANCELIUS TEOLOOGINA JUHENDATUD DISPUTATSIOONIDE PÕHJAL magistritöö juhendaja MARJU LEPAJÕE, MA Tartu 2010 Sisukord SISSEJUHATUS .................................................................................................... 4 TÄNU ..................................................................................................................... 9 I. LUTERLIK ORTODOKSIA............................................................................. 10 1.1. Ajastu üldiseloomustus .............................................................................. 10 1.1.1. Ajalooline ülevaade ............................................................................ 10 1.1.2. Ortodoksia tekkepõhjused................................................................... 13 1.2. Luterlik ortodoksia..................................................................................... 14 1.2.1. Periodiseering, tähtsamad esindajad ning koolkonnad....................... 14 1.2.2. Luterliku ortodoksia teoloogilised põhijooned ................................... 17 1.2.2.1. Pühakiri........................................................................................ 17 1.2.2.2. Õpetus Jumalast ........................................................................... 19 1.2.2.3. Loomisest ja inimese pattulangemisest........................................ 22 1.2.2.4. Ettehooldest ja ettemääratusest.................................................... 23 1.2.2.5. Vabast tahtest..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Not a Covenant of Works in Disguise” (Herman Bavinck1): the Place of the Mosaic Covenant in Redemptive History
    MAJT 24 (2013): 143-177 “NOT A COVENANT OF WORKS IN DISGUISE” (HERMAN BAVINCK1): THE PLACE OF THE MOSAIC COVENANT IN REDEMPTIVE HISTORY by Robert Letham READERS WILL DOUBTLESS be aware of the argument that the Mosaic covenant is in some way a republication of the covenant of works made by God with Adam before the fall. In recent years, this has been strongly advocated by Meredith Kline and others influenced by his views. In this article I will ask some historical and theological questions of the claim. I will also consider how far Reformed theology, particularly in the period up to the production of the major confessional documents of the Westminster Assembly (1643-47), was of one mind on the question. 2 I will concentrate on the argument itself, without undue reference to persons.3 1. Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, Volume 3: Sin and Salvation in Christ (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), 222. 2. Apart from the works of Kline, cited below, others have addressed the matter in some detail - Mark W. Karlberg, “The Search for an Evangelical Consensus on Paul and the Law,” JETS 40 (1997): 563–79; Mark W. Karlberg, “Recovering the Mosaic Covenant as Law and Gospel: J. Mark Beach, John H. Sailhammer, and Jason C. Meyer as Representative Expositors,” EQ 83, no. 3 (2011): 233–50; D. Patrick Ramsey, “In Defense of Moses: A Confessional Critique of Kline and Karlberg,” WTJ 66 (2004): 373–400; Brenton C. Ferry, “Cross-Examining Moses’ Defense: An Answer to Ramsey’s Critique of Kline and Karlberg,” WTJ 67 (2005): 163–68; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Heresy Proceedings in Languedoc, 1500-1560 Author(S): Raymond A
    Heresy Proceedings in Languedoc, 1500-1560 Author(s): Raymond A. Mentzer, Jr. Source: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, Vol. 74, No. 5 (1984), pp. 1-183 Published by: American Philosophical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1006391 . Accessed: 17/12/2013 10:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Philosophical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 142.58.129.109 on Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:14:05 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TRANSACTIONS ofthe AmericanPhilosophical Society Held at Philadelphiafor Promoting Useful Knowledge VOLUME 74, Part 5, 1984 Heresy Proceedingsin Languedoc, 1500-1560 RAYMOND A. MENTZER,JR. Associate Professorof History, Montana State University THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY Independence Square, Philadelphia 1984 This content downloaded from 142.58.129.109 on Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:14:05 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Copyright? 1984 by The AmericanPhilosophical Society Libraryof Congress Catalog Card Number 83-73280 IntemationalStandard Book Number 0-87169-745-9 US ISSN 0065-9746 This content downloaded from 142.58.129.109 on Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:14:05 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions CONTENTS Page Introduction.........................................
    [Show full text]