46 Maria Bogucka
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary -
Ambassadors to and from England
p.1: Prominent Foreigners. p.25: French hostages in England, 1559-1564. p.26: Other Foreigners in England. p.30: Refugees in England. p.33-85: Ambassadors to and from England. Prominent Foreigners. Principal suitors to the Queen: Archduke Charles of Austria: see ‘Emperors, Holy Roman’. France: King Charles IX; Henri, Duke of Anjou; François, Duke of Alençon. Sweden: King Eric XIV. Notable visitors to England: from Bohemia: Baron Waldstein (1600). from Denmark: Duke of Holstein (1560). from France: Duke of Alençon (1579, 1581-1582); Prince of Condé (1580); Duke of Biron (1601); Duke of Nevers (1602). from Germany: Duke Casimir (1579); Count Mompelgart (1592); Duke of Bavaria (1600); Duke of Stettin (1602). from Italy: Giordano Bruno (1583-1585); Orsino, Duke of Bracciano (1601). from Poland: Count Alasco (1583). from Portugal: Don Antonio, former King (1581, Refugee: 1585-1593). from Sweden: John Duke of Finland (1559-1560); Princess Cecilia (1565-1566). Bohemia; Denmark; Emperors, Holy Roman; France; Germans; Italians; Low Countries; Navarre; Papal State; Poland; Portugal; Russia; Savoy; Spain; Sweden; Transylvania; Turkey. Bohemia. Slavata, Baron Michael: 1576 April 26: in England, Philip Sidney’s friend; May 1: to leave. Slavata, Baron William (1572-1652): 1598 Aug 21: arrived in London with Paul Hentzner; Aug 27: at court; Sept 12: left for France. Waldstein, Baron (1581-1623): 1600 June 20: arrived, in London, sightseeing; June 29: met Queen at Greenwich Palace; June 30: his travels; July 16: in London; July 25: left for France. Also quoted: 1599 Aug 16; Beddington. Denmark. King Christian III (1503-1 Jan 1559): 1559 April 6: Queen Dorothy, widow, exchanged condolences with Elizabeth. -
The Elizabethan Court Day by Day--1580
1580 1580 At WHITEHALL PALACE Jan 1,Fri New Year gifts. New Year Gift roll not extant, but Sir Gilbert Dethick, Garter King of Arms, gave the Queen a Book of Arms of the Knights of the Garter ‘made in the reign of Henry II and Richard I’. Also Jan 1: Edward Stafford at Whitehall after special embassy to France. Spanish Ambassador, Mendoza, to Philip II, Jan 13, London: On the 1st ‘Stafford arrived here, having been sent by Alençon with a letter to the Queen, in the sealing-wax of which was embedded an emerald worth 400 crowns...Stafford said that Alençon would soon be here; two persons of rank however would precede him. Alençon gave him a chain of a 1000 crowns, and as much more in jewels and buttons. The Queen sent a post to Alençon on the night Stafford arrived, and told the latter to make ready for his speedy return to France’. [Span.iii.1-2]. Also Jan 1: play: The Four Sons of Fabius, by Earl of Warwick’s Men. Revels provided: ‘Senators’ gowns; three head attires; women’s scarves and girdles; a city; a mount; six pair of gloves’. Jan 3,Sun play: Scipio Africanus, by the Children of Paul’s. Revels provided: ‘Triumphant ensigns and banners new made; scarves and garters; a city; a battlement; 18 pair of gloves’. Jan 6,Wed play, a history, by Earl of Leicester’s Men. Revels provided: ‘a city; a country house; seven pair of gloves’. Court news. Jan 12, London, Sir George Bowes to his brother Robert Bowes: ‘The marriage is on foot again’ and ‘her Highness seems as forward as ever’. -
A Powerful (WO)
Abstract The thesis examines the correspondence of Bertrand de Salignac de la Motte-Fénélon (1568- 75) and Michel de Castelnau, seigneur de la Mauvissière (1575-1585). From their correspondence two themes stand central, namely Elizabeth as a woman and Elizabeth as a ruler. In contrary to other works, the individuality of both ambassadors is discussed and the differences and similarities between ambassadors are presented. This thesis will argue that Elizabeth’s gender has been overplayed in her historiography. While gender is mentioned, it does not take a prominent role in the ambassadorial dispatches of Fénélon and Mauvissière. Furthermore, Fénélon and Mauvissière recognised Elizabeth’s usage of her gender in political situations and reported this to the French royal family. Additionally, Fénélon and Mauvissière had different views on Elizabeth’s rule. For instance, both ambassadors did not perceive Elizabeth as indecisive, but recognised her procrastination as a political tool. Moreover, Fénélon and Mauvissière were aware of the influence of Elizabeth’s members, but knew that the queen held the final say in political decisions. Lastly, while Fénélon acknowledged the significance of Elizabeth’s ladies- in-waiting, Mauvissière did not mention the ladies once, which illustrates the difference between the ambassadors. PERCEIVING ELIZABETH I IN FRENCH DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENCE (1568-1584) Lisa van der Torre 12 August 2019, 23:30 University of Oxford Page 1 of 37 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis supervisors, professor Duindam and professor Doran, for their guidance during the writing process of my thesis. With their insightful feedback and expertise, they provided me with the right tools to complete this thesis. -
Quaritch Catalogue 1430 Philosophy, Politics and Economics
QUARITCH CATALOGUE 1430 PHILOSOPHY, POLITICS AND ECONOMICS (a simple thematic index is provided at the end of the catalogue) BERNARD QUARITCH 40 South Audley Street London W1K 2PR [email protected] QUARITCH CATALOGUE 1430 PHILOSOPHY, POLITICS AND ECONOMICS A MEMOIR OF JOHN ADAM, PRESENTED TO THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER LORD GRENVILLE BY WILLIAM ADAM 1. [ADAM, William (editor).] Description and Representation of the Mural Monument, Erected in the Cathedral of Calcutta, by General Subscription, to the Memory of John Adam, Designed and Executed by Richard Westmacott, R.A. [?Edinburgh: ?William Adam, circa 1830]. 4to, pp. [4 (blank ll.)], [1]-2 (‘Address of the British Inhabitants of Calcutta, to John Adam, on his Embarking for England in March 1825’), [2 (contents, verso blank)], [2 (blank l.)], [2 (title, verso blank)], [1]-2 (‘Description of the Monument’), [2 (‘Inscription on the Base of the Tomb’, verso blank)], [2 (‘Translation of Claudian’)], [1 (‘Extract of a Letter from … Reginald Heber … to … Charles Williams Wynn’)], [2 (‘Extract from a Sermon of Bishop Heber, Preached at Calcutta on Christmas Day, 1825’)], [1 (blank)]; mounted engraved plate on india by J. Horsburgh after Westmacott, retaining tissue guard; some light spotting, a little heavier on plate; contemporary straight-grained [?Scottish] black morocco [?for Adam for presentation], endpapers watermarked 1829, boards with broad borders of palmette and flower-and-thistle rolls, upper board lettered in blind ‘Monument to John Adam Erected at Calcutta 1827’, turn-ins roll-tooled in blind, mustard- yellow endpapers, all edges gilt; slightly rubbed and scuffed, otherwise very good; provenance: William Wyndham Grenville, Baron Grenville, 3 March 1830 (1759-1834, autograph presentation inscription from William Adam on preliminary blank and tipped-in autograph letter signed from Adam to Grenville, Edinburgh, 6 March 1830, 3pp on a bifolium, addressed on final page). -
Performing Diplomacies: the 1560S Court Entertainments of Mary Queen of Scots
The Scottish Historical Review, Volume LXXXII, 2: No. 214: October 2003, 194–225 SARAH CARPENTER Performing Diplomacies: The 1560s Court Entertainments of Mary Queen of Scots ‘Thair began the masking, which from year to year hath continewed since.’1 John Knox’s notorious fulmination against the courtly entertain- ment of Mary Queen of Scots’ personal reign, in particular its ‘excessive dancing’, implies that her court was exceptionally devoted to perfor- mance and display. In the eyes of Knox and other reformers, the lively performance culture of the court straightforwardly revealed the moral and religious shortcomings of its monarch: ‘In fidling and flynging’ she was ‘more exercised then in reading or hearing of Goddis most blessed word’; ‘banketting, immoderat dansing’ are linked to avarice, oppres- sion of the poor, and ‘hurdome that thairof enseuis’.2 In diagnosing the investment of the court in such spectacle as not only excessive, but a result of individual taste and moral failing, the reformers were plainly simplifying a far more complex phenomenon. Mary’s court may well have attracted their suspicion: Gordon Donaldson has established the French dominance, and the relatively lowly born status of the queen’s household, both of which may have caused ten- sions.3 But the court was no more obviously committed to dancing and display than those of Elizabeth I, or of Catherine de Medici in France, both of whom were at times congratulated for honourable and appropri- ate magnificence.4 Although each court had its own character and culture, valuing and employing entertainments in different ways, a pow- erful international rhetoric of performance and spectacle had devel- oped. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION This publication stems from a broad project to explore the activ- ities of the French ambassadors in England during the 1560s, a period when French sources of English affairs have been relatively neglected, between the exceptionally well-preserved archives of the Noailles brothers in the 1550s and La Mothe Fénelon in the 1570s. Having published what remains of the despatches of the che- valier de Seure as ambassador to England in 1560–1561,1 I turned to the question of his successor, Paul de Foix, and quickly became con- vinced that he was one of the most interesting figures to represent his country in England during the sixteenth century. De Lamar Jensen described him as ‘that indomitable dynamo of energy and talent’.2 A highly respected scholar and religious liberal, he entered modern popular consciousness when played improbably as a typical swagger- ing French sword nobleman by the footballer turned actor Eric Cantona in Shekhar Kapur’s 1998 film Elizabeth. The portrait which is the frontispiece of this book underlines the difference. Paul de Foix occupied the post of French ambassador in England during a period of upheaval and transition in both countries, from early 1562 until the spring of 1566, a period which saw civil war in France, a war between England and France, intense insecurity in England over the succession, a protracted period of rapproche- ment involving bizarre marriage negotiations between Elizabeth and the court of France and, finally, deep preoccupation both in England and France with manoeuvres in Scotland around the future of Mary Stuart.3 De Foix’s correspondence is preserved only in frag- mentary form and yet, as it survives, provides important insights into the politics and culture of both countries. -
Tudor England's Relations with France
Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. Tudor England’s Relations with France Dr Simon Adams University of Strathclyde Various source media, State Papers Online EMPOWER™ RESEARCH TUDOR ENGLAND’S RELATIONS treaty of London (4 October 1518), they agreed as a WITH FRANCE[1] gesture of good will to post one of their chamber gentlemen as ambassador resident at the other’s [2] court. This was the first English resident embassy established by treaty and the only permanent English The sixteenth century was an unusual chapter in the embassy of the century. The French embassy in London long history of England’s complex relations with ranked with those in Rome and Madrid.[3] Diplomatic France. At the beginning of the century only Calais contact was broken briefly by war (in the mid–1520s, remained of the English Crown’s once-extensive 1544–1546 and 1557–1559), but restored immediately possessions on the other side of the Channel. If Henry afterwards. A further clause in the treaty was no less VIII harboured ambitions of regaining the lost significant: an agreement to meet as soon as territories, capturing Boulogne in 1544, the English convenient. This was the origin of the best-known royal occupation of Boulogne lasted only until 1550 and meeting of the century, the Field of the Cloth of Gold on Calais fell in 1558. Throughout the century there was the border of the Calais Pale in June 1520.[4] Henry VIII also a diplomatic (and occasionally military) struggle and Francis I met again less formally in late 1532 on for influence over Scotland. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION French ambassadors in England Anglo-French relations in the early modern period can be understood through a rich range of cultural artefacts and purely historical sources. Among the latter, the reports of French visitors, and especially of the resident ambassadors, have always featured prominently, though perhaps excessively pillaged for information on the inner politics of the country they were observing. Essentially devised to maintain a sort of dialogue between their masters, they provide sometimes very oblique insights into their host country.1 The reports of Imperial and Spanish ambassadors (summarized in the great series of Calendars2)havein many ways shaped our understanding of high politics in the period but no equivalent was undertaken for French archives. However, the French publication of the despatches of Jean du Bellay, Charles de Marillac, and Odet de Selve have thrown a crucial light on Anglo- French relations in the first half of the sixteenth century.3 Meanwhile, the 1550s is clearly dominated by the extensive archives of the Noailles brothers during their embassies between 1553 and 1559.4 1For an example, see D. Potter, ‘Jean du Bellay et l’Angleterre, 1527–50’, in Loris Petris, P.Galand, O. Christin, and C. Michon (eds), Actes du Colloque Jean du Bellay (Neuchatel,ˆ 2014), pp. 47–66. 2G.A. Bergenroth, P. de Gayangos, M.A.S. Hume, and R. Tyler (eds), Calendar of Letters, Despatches and State Papers Relating to the Negotiations Between England and Spain, Preserved in the Archives at Simancas and Elsewhere (1485–1558), 13 vols (London, 1862–1954); M.A.S. Hume (ed.), Calendar of Letters and State Papers Relating to English Affairs Preserved Principally in the Archives of Simancas, 4 vols (London, 1892–1899). -
INFORMATION, INTELLIGENCE and NEGOTIATION in the WEST EUROPEAN DIPLOMATIC WORLD, 1558-1588 Dissertation Presented in Partial
INFORMATION, INTELLIGENCE AND NEGOTIATION IN THE WEST EUROPEAN DIPLOMATIC WORLD, 1558-1588 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Denice Lyn Fett, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Professor Geoffrey Parker, Co-Advisor Professor David Cressy, Co-Advisor Professor Alan Gallay Professor Richard K. Herrmann Copyright By Denice Lyn Fett 2009 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the Reformation world that helped to create and solidify many of our modern diplomatic institutions, including concepts concerning resident embassies, ambassadors’ duties, and internationally recognized diplomatic privileges. In the early sixteenth century, Western European governments took hesitant steps toward implementing Italian models of diplomatic discourse developed in the previous century. The advent of the Reformation halted this progression and ultimately caused the early Reformation monarchs to abandon this experiment. Their successors revived the practice the middle of the sixteenth century because of financial constraints; the medieval preference for war instead of diplomacy could no longer be indulged because the key states of Western Europe—England, France and Spain—all verged on bankruptcy and faced internal turmoil caused in large part by the Reformation. The resurgence of diplomacy in Europe after the ratification of the Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis in 1559 demonstrated the vital importance of information to the nascent diplomatic system. The need to control all stages of the information cycle—its acquisition, dissemination and utilization—crossed national, religious, political, social and cultural lines. Without accurate and reliable information, governments could not succeed at international negotiations and protect national interests. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY PRIMARY SOURCES MANUSCRIPTS Bibliothèque Impériale, Fonds de Saint Germain, n° 223. BNF, Cinq Cent Colbert, n° 470. BNF, Cinq Cent Colbert, n° 337. BNF, Collection Clairambault. BNF, Collection Moreau, n° 720. BNF, Collection Moreau, n° 721. BNF, MS. Fr. 3305. BNF, MS. Fr. 3307. BNF, MS. Fr. 3308. BNF, MS. Fr. 3309. BNF, MS. Fr. 3330. BNF, MS. Fr. 3377. BNF, MS. Fr. 3394. BNF, MS. Fr. 3398. BNF, MS. Fr. 10752. BNF, MS. Fr. 15907. BNF, MS. Fr. 15908. BNF, MS. Fr. 15971. BNF, MS. Fr. 15973. BNF, MS. Fr. 24168. BNF, Nouvelles Acquisitions, Fr. 6003. © The Author(s) 2019 215 E. Paranque, Elizabeth I of England through Valois Eyes, Queenship and Power, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01529-9 216 BIBLIOGRAPHY BNF, V° Colbert, n° 337. BNF, V° Colbert, n° 471. BL, Add. MS. n° 19398. BL, Cottonian Library, Caligula D.I., fol. 220. BL, Cottonian Library, Caligula, C.1, Plut XX D, fol. 74. BL, Cottonian Library, Caligula E, vol. VI, fol. 60. BL, Cottonian Library, EVI, 106. SP 12/130. SP 70/113. SP 78/4. SP 78/5. SP 78/12. SP 78/13. SP 78/15. SP 78/16. SP 78/17. SP 78/18. PRINTED SOURCES MAIN PRINTED SOURCES Ambassades de Messieurs de Noailles en Angleterre, rédigées par feu M. L’Abbé de Vertot. Tome 1. Leyden: Dessaint & Saillant Libraires, 1763. Correspondence diplomatique de Bertrand de Salignac de la Mothe Fénélon, ambas- sadeur de France en Angleterre, de 1568 à 1575. Tome Premier, Années 1568 et 1569. Archives du Royaume: Paris et Londres, 1838. -
Henry Howard and the Politics of Writing in Sixteenth Century England Anna Christine Caney
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Patronage, Public Spheres and the Problem of Female Rule: Henry Howard and the Politics of Writing in Sixteenth Century England Anna Christine Caney Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PATRONAGE, PUBLIC SPHERES AND THE PROBLEM OF FEMALE RULE: HENRY HOWARD AND THE POLITICS OF WRITING IN SIXTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND By ANNA CHRISTINE CANEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2013 Anna Christine Caney defended this dissertation on April 18, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Charles Upchurch Professor Directing Dissertation Gary Taylor University Representative Darrin McMahon Committee Member Jonathon Grant Committee Member Peter Garretson Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Andrew, Allison, Catherine, and my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The understanding, patience and criticism and encouragement of my committee members- Professors Charles Upchurch, Darrin McMahon, Jonathan Grant, Peter Garretson, and Gary Taylor- as this project would not have been successful without them. They have helped form me as a historian and I sincerely appreciate their help and commitment in allowing me to finish this dissertation. Professor Richard Greaves- who opened the door to this topic, and Dr. David Mock who provided invaluable resources in order to move forward with my research and enabled me to move forward with the project.