Henry Howard and the Politics of Writing in Sixteenth Century England Anna Christine Caney
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Patronage, Public Spheres and the Problem of Female Rule: Henry Howard and the Politics of Writing in Sixteenth Century England Anna Christine Caney Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PATRONAGE, PUBLIC SPHERES AND THE PROBLEM OF FEMALE RULE: HENRY HOWARD AND THE POLITICS OF WRITING IN SIXTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND By ANNA CHRISTINE CANEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2013 Anna Christine Caney defended this dissertation on April 18, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Charles Upchurch Professor Directing Dissertation Gary Taylor University Representative Darrin McMahon Committee Member Jonathon Grant Committee Member Peter Garretson Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Andrew, Allison, Catherine, and my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The understanding, patience and criticism and encouragement of my committee members- Professors Charles Upchurch, Darrin McMahon, Jonathan Grant, Peter Garretson, and Gary Taylor- as this project would not have been successful without them. They have helped form me as a historian and I sincerely appreciate their help and commitment in allowing me to finish this dissertation. Professor Richard Greaves- who opened the door to this topic, and Dr. David Mock who provided invaluable resources in order to move forward with my research and enabled me to move forward with the project. My parents and uncle, Mike Sullivan- they provided support and resources to help me conduct research under very difficult circumstances. Andrew McRory- he had amazing willingness to step in and help as a partner and friend while accepting my frustration, late nights, and absence from the kitchen while writing. I could not have completed this project without him. He has my deepest love and appreciation for standing by me over the past few years. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract vi Abbreviations vii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. A NOBLEMAN’S LIFE 24 3. THE ELIZABETHAN COURT IN THE 1560’S AND 1570’S 56 4. INCEPTION 82 5. THE VIA MEDIA AND POLITICS 114 6. THE FINAL ATTEMPT 142 7. PREFERMENT AND LEGACY 173 REFERENCES 192 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 210 v ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the career of Henry Howard, Elizabethan courtier, and his principle intellectual work, “A Dutifull Defence of the Lawful Regiment of Weomen,” in order to better understand the politics of Elizabethan court culture, the nature of political loyalty in the face of confessional pluralism, and the ways in which gender difference was theorized in the early modern period. Henry Howard’s career constitutes one of the most remarkable success and survival stories of the sixteenth and early seventeenth century. Born into the most prominent Catholic family in England, Howard saw his father, two cousins, and his brother be executed for treason. During his life he constantly remained under suspicion for being a practicing Catholic, consorting with Jesuits, and participating in conspiracies against Queen Elizabeth. Howard was deprived of his income and position, arrested and imprisoned numerous times, and was forced to survive on the periphery of the court. Yet remarkably, he survived. At the accession of James I he was awarded the title Earl of Northampton, and by the time of his death in 1614 he was the wealthiest man in England. The story of the “Dutifull Defence” is no less extraordinary. Several authors wrote defenses of Queen Elizabeth in response to John Knox’s First Blast of the Trumpet. However, Henry Howard had the advantage of not only being a nobleman, but he was also a graduate of Cambridge University. He had the education and ability to respond to Knox. “Dutifull Defence” contains over 400 sources, which Howard used to reject Knox’s arguments against women based on Aristotelian biology. Instead he proposed a Platonic understanding of gender difference. By combining Platonic ideas of gender with his extensive knowledge of the Church fathers, Scripture, and English Civil law, Howard was able to construct an intellectually consistent and sound defense of queenship. vi Previous historians have usually only looked at aspects of Howard’s life, and only superficial fragments of the “Dutifull Defence,” and none have tried to integrate the study of the two. This dissertation combines the dynamic of Henry Howard’s life and his composition of “Dutifull Defence” in order to reveal the importance of the manuscript. In composing “Dutifull Defence” he contributed a significant work to the gender debate based on his own personal experiences and a genuine belief that a woman was capable of ruling a country. In analyzing the content, production, and circulation of the “Dutifull Defence” in conjunction with Howard’s experiences as a courtier, this dissertation, following the model of early modern public spheres developed in the work of by Peter Lake and Steven Pincus, demonstrates the ways in which identities, ideas, and publics could be successfully manipulated to create stability in the tumultuous world of Elizabethan court politics. vii ABBREVIATIONS Add. Additional BL British Library DNB Dictionary of National Biography “Dutifull Defence” Henry Howard, “The Dutifull Defence of the Lawful Regiment of Weomen.” BL Lansdowne MSS, 813 (1590) CSPD Calendar of State Papers Domestic Series. Vol. 1, 1547- 1580; Vol. 2, 1581-1590. CSPF Calendar of State Papers Foreign Series. Vol. 15, Jan. 1581-Apr. 1582 CSPS Calendar of State Papers Spanish Series. Vol.3, 1580-1586 HLRO House of Lords Record Office MSS Manuscript OED Oxford English Dictionary PRO Public Record Office SP State Papers s.v. sub verdo viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION In 1590, Queen Elizabeth I received a leather bound manuscript as a gift from a courtier. It was a treatise, “A Dutifull Defence of the Lawful Regiment of Women,” written by Lord Henry Howard in an attempt to defend Elizabeth’s right to rule, and also to win the favor and patronage of the queen. The purpose of Howard’s work was to defend the queen’s right to rule as a woman, and in stating his opinion, Howard did not mince his words: Whosoever will deprive a lawfull owner of lesse matters then inheritannce of kingdomes must produce sounde evidence. In triall of this question there is no doubte but woemen have a voice because according to that principle of the Civile Lawe quod omnes tangit etc. that which concerneth all, must be approved in like sorte by all before it take effect. If weomen speak not in printe against themselves theie can receive no hurte…1 The work was not unique in that written works about, and presented to Queen Elizabeth were common during her reign. Numerous authors penned books, pamphlets, and treatises concerning the different aspects of her monarchy that elicited public debate. In particular, her gender, her marital status, and the nature of her religious confession were popular subjects of both written work, and verbal debate. Howard’s treatise is different, however, in that it was written by a nobleman, who was also educated. Howard’s family was the highest ranking in England, holding the Dukedom of Norfolk.2 Howard was educated at Cambridge, taking his degree in 1564 and then remaining on to teach at the university.3 “Dutifull Defence” was composed in the 1580s, late in the debate on gender, as most works for and against female rule appeared early in 1 Howard, Henry. “A Dutifull Defence of the Lawful Regiment of Women” (1590), 30r. 2 See W.A. Sessions, Henry Howard the Poet Earl of Surrey, A Life. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 20- 22. 3 Linda Levy Peck, Northampton: Patronage and Policy at the Court of James I. (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982), 8; Daniel Andersson, Lord Henry Howard (1540-1614): An Elizabethan Life. (Woodbridge, Suffolk: D.S. Brewer, 2009), 9. 1 Elizabeth’s reign. Howard’s decision and motives for writing “Dutifull Defence” is included in the queries surrounding Howard and his life. The manuscript is an intricately assembled work that Howard began in 1577, but due to intrigue and court politics, he did not complete until thirteen years later. “Dutifull Defence” represents over a decade of time and effort put into composition and rhetoric. However, it is also a representation of the society, culture, politics, and religion that surrounded and challenged Queen Elizabeth and her reign. England had already faced decades of diplomatic, cultural, and religious crisis that in many respects, only worsened at the advent of her reign in 1558. Her father, Henry VIII, had torn the Church away from Rome and declared the monarch the head of the new Church of England.4 During the brief reigns of both her brother Edward and sister Mary, religion played a powerful role that was inseparable from the political world as the monarchy struggled to bend the nobility and the general population to its particular confession of faith. Noble families and court factions of Reformed and Catholic leanings vied for attention from the monarch in order to support their own interests. Foreign powers sought to influence diplomatic decisions that involved the faith of a queen, whose country was deeply involved in the religious and political conflicts dividing the continent. And, religious bodies fought to protect the interests of their own confessions through support or detraction of the monarch. In 1559 Elizabeth was able, for the most part, to convince her councilors and subjects to compromise on the issue with a religious settlement.