2 the Religious Endowments of Şeyhülislam Feyzullah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 the Religious Endowments of Şeyhülislam Feyzullah Dror Ze’evi and Ehud R. Toledano (Eds.) Society, Law, and Culture in the Middle East “Modernities” in the Making Dror Ze’evi and Ehud R. Toledano (Eds.) Society, Law, and Culture in the Middle East “Modernities” in the Making Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license, which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Copyright © 2015 Dror Ze’evi, Ehud R. Toledano ISBN: 978-3-11-043974-8 e-ISBN: 978-3-11-043975-5 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. The Deutsche National- bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Kara-Keui (Galata) bridge, Constantinople, Turkey This volume is dedicated to the beleaguered, common people of the post-Ottoman Middle East, the real victims of unscrupulous leaders and intractable belief systems. May calm and peace be upon these troubled lands. Contents Acknowledgements X Introduction: Unpacking Middle East Modernities Dror Ze’evi and Ehud R. Toledano Social Transformation and the State in the Middle East 2 Part I: Unpacking Society Dror Ze’evi and Ilkim Buke 1 Banishment, Confiscation, and the Instability of the Ottoman Elite Household 16 1.1 Who Were the Pashas? 16 1.2 Households on Quicksand 21 1.3 Dismissal and Banishment 23 1.4 Confiscation Policy 27 1.5 Implications for the Ottoman Household 29 Michael Nizri 2 The Religious Endowments of Şeyhülislam Feyzullah Efendi: The Waqf Institution and the Survival of Ottoman Elite Households 31 2.1 Introduction 31 2.2 Feyzullah Efendi 33 2.3 The Ottoman Elite Household: Recruitment and Upkeep 34 2.4 The Religious Endowments of Feyzullah Efendi 36 2.5 The Contribution of the Waqf to the Survival of the Household 39 2.6 The Dynamism and Pragmatism of the Waqf 40 Tsameret Levy-Daphny 3 To be a Voyvoda in Diyarbakır: Socio-Political Change in an 18th-Century Ottoman Province 44 3.1 The Voyvoda and Voyvodalık 46 3.2 Conclusion 55 Part II: Unpacking Law and Culture Nimrod Hurvitz 4 Where Have All the People Gone? A Critique of Medieval Islamic Historiography 60 4.1 Introduction: The Lacuna 60 4.2 Historiography of the Shi`a 62 4.3 Historiography of the Madhāhib 68 4.4 Concluding Remarks 72 Guy Burak 5 According to His Exalted Ḳânûn: Contending Visions of the Muftiship in the Ottoman Province of Damascus (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries) 74 5.1 I 74 5.2 II 76 5.3 III 79 5.4 IV 82 5.5 V 84 Avi Rubin 6 The Slave, the Governor, and the Judge: An Ottoman Socio-Legal Drama from the Late Nineteenth Century 87 6.1 Introduction 87 6.2 New Courts 89 6.3 The Trial of Ali Eşref Efendi 91 6.3.1 The Charges 91 6.3.2 Slavery and Abolition 93 6.3.3 Bezmihal 95 6.3.4 A Compassionate Judge 95 6.3.5 Governor Emin Bey 97 6.3.6 Court Investigation 98 6.3.7 Decision 100 6.4 Legal Formalism and Accountability 101 6.5 Conclusion 103 Omri Paz 7 The Policeman and State Policy: Police Accountability, Civilian Entitlements, and Ottoman Modernism, 1840–1860s 104 7.1 Introduction 104 7.1.1 The Ottoman Police 105 7.2 “Direct Access” 109 7.3 The “Nanny State” 111 7.4 Establishment of the Ottoman Police 111 7.5 Conclusion 120 Avner Wishnitzer 8 “At Approximately Eleven, Just Before Nightfall”: An Introduction to Ottoman Temporal Culture 121 8.1 Introduction 121 8.2 Reading the Clock, Alaturka or: When is Eleven O’clock Anyway? 123 8.3 Synchronizing Clocks with the Heavens 128 8.4 When Night Falls 129 8.5 How Approximate is “Approximately?” 131 8.6 The Transformation of Ottoman Temporal Culture 133 8.7 Conclusion 134 Liat Kozma 9 How to Work on Social History in the Egyptian Archives: Some Thoughts 135 9.1 Death in Alexandria 136 9.2 Histories of Archival Texts 140 9.3 Historians in the Archives 141 9.4 Historicizing the Archives 144 9.5 An Israeli Historian in Cairo 146 9.6 Epilogue 147 Bibliography 149 List of Figures 163 List of Tables 163 Index 164 Acknowledgements Some of the chapters in this volume originated in papers that students of Ehud R. Toledano presented to a colloquium in his honor at Tel Aviv University. The Editors wish to thank Dr Mira Tzoreff for her superb work in organizing the colloquium. As always, Idan Barir contributed his talents and dedication to the success of that event. Introduction: Unpacking Middle East Modernities Dror Ze’evi and Ehud R. Toledano Social Transformation and the State in the Middle East If history is an “unending dialogue between the present and the past,”1 then from our contemporary perspective, the past is bound to appear unstable, fraught with uncertainties, hard to explain in clear-cut, neatly conceived terms. Once ruled by the Ottoman sultans, the vast domains covered in this volume have in recent years expe- rienced great turmoil that set in motion processes which are far from complete and whose nature, direction, and implications are unpredictable. The series of revolutions that has been tearing apart many states in the Middle East and North Africa since the end of 2010 were preceded by the attacks of 9/11 in 2001 and the global financial crisis that has affected economies the world over from September 2008 onward. All these developments have intensified uncertainties, underlying growing doubts about our ability to understand socio-political, socio-cultural, and economic phenomena in human history; they have naturally led us to ask new questions about the past. This volume offers a fresh look at change—the driving force of history anywhere anytime. Change, as we have come to realize over generations of writing history, can be rapid and transformative, or it can be slow and incremental. Shades of different processes of change can be located between these two poles on the same continuum. Whereas some forms of change are clear and easy to detect, such as those emanating from revolutions, other forms of change occur without the awareness of the people who experience them, noticeable only after they have achieved masse critique. And, of course, there are periods when attempts to introduce change fail, as continuity predominates and structures persevere for long periods of time, appearing as stag- nation. Incidentally, regression and decline—not just progression and advance—are also forms of change, and one often leads to the other. This volume seeks to deepen and broaden our understanding of all these forms of change in a modern Middle East context. The other area in which we hope to contribute to the existing literature is open- ness to theory in the social sciences, which can provide plausible interpretations of the history of change in the Middle East and North Africa. The judicious use of insights from bodies of theoretical knowledge serves most contributors to challenge basic notions in the current discourse on the relationship between society, culture, and law. Finally, the chapters in this volume shift the focus from an external to an internal per- spective, as agency transitions from the “West” to local, Ottoman and Arab, actors in the regions discussed here. However, the shift of focus put forth in many chapters of this volume is not a total revision, nor an ambitious new interpretation of how Middle 1 E.H. Carr, What is History? (London: The Macmillan Press, second edition, 1986), 24. © 2015 Selection and editorial matter: Dror Zeevi and Ehud R. Toledano; individual contributors, their contributions. Social Transformation and the State in the Middle East 3 East and North African societies were being transformed. Rather, it is to point out the ongoing interaction between internal processes and external stimuli that produced the brands of modernity that we find in these regions. So, here we need to begin with defining, or perhaps redefining, the very notion of modernity/modernities. Among the most influential categories being deconstructed or tossed away, modernity—both in the singular and plural forms—has been a leading victim of social theory critics. But as such analytic categories fall out of grace with scholars, they are not replaced by powerful alternatives, capable of improving our understanding of crucial processes, or even in identifying new, undetected movements in history. Rather, we keep getting soft power-type substitutes, which hesitantly offer partial nar- ratives with very limited, unambitious explanatory efficacy. Although history is not supposed to be predictive, having failed to even insinuate the likelihood of a global financial quagmire or an Arab Spring/Islamic Winter, it has left historians modestly cautious about their ability to explain the transformations that did occur during the long nineteenth century in the Ottoman Middle East and North Africa. Frederick Cooper has masterfully reduced to virtual rubble the power of “moder- nity/modernities”, “modernism” and “modernization” to make sense of what took place in both European and non-European societies since the Enlightenment and the rise of capitalism and colonialism.2 From Talcott Parsons through Daniel Lerner, Wilbert Moore, W.W. Rostow, David Apter, Daniel Bell, and Charles Taylor, to their subaltern and post-colonial critics, such as Partha Chatterjee and Dipesh Chakrab- arty, Cooper traces the way modernity was constructed, used, and de-constructed.3 He convincingly argues that a major part of the problem is that the category has been conceived as a “package,” or “a bundle of social, ideological, and political phenom- ena whose historical origins lie in the West.”4 These were supposed both to reflect actual realities and to act as “causal agent” for change, or to serve as both analytic and normative categories.
Recommended publications
  • T.C. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dali
    T.C. KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI ANADOLU BEYLİKLERİNDE KADIN’IN SİYASİ VE SOSYAL ROLÜ (YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ) İlknur GÜNDOĞDU DANIŞMAN Prof. Dr. Cevdet YAKUPOĞLU KASTAMONU 2018 T.C. KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ ANADOLU BEYLİKLERİNDE KADIN’IN SİYASİ VE SOSYAL ROLÜ İlknur GÜNDOĞDU Danışman Prof. Dr. Cevdet YAKUPOĞLU Jüri Üyesi Prof. Dr. İlhan ERDEM Jüri Üyesi Doç. Dr. Namıq MUSALI KASTAMONU – 2018 iv ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi ANADOLU BEYLİKLERİNDE KADIN’IN SİYASİ VE SOSYAL ROLÜ İlknur GÜNDOĞDU Kastamonu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı Danışman: Prof. Dr. Cevdet YAKUPOĞLU Türk tarihi boyunca kadın; her daim hayatın başlangıcı, yönetiminde hâkimiyetin ortağı olarak değerlendirilmiş ve bu konuda ikinci plana atılmamıştır. Kadın; yeri geldiğinde şefkatli ana oluş, yeri geldiğinde ise; eline kılıç alıp, atına binip, cesurca erlerle birlikte savaşmaktan geri kalmamıştır. Eri ile neredeyse aynı haklara sahip olan Türk kadınına verilen değer abidelerde, yazıtlarda ve destanlarda kendini göstermiştir. Her daim bir otoriteye dâhil olan kadın, siyasi ve sosyal haklarını uzun bir süre korumayı başarmıştır. Türk kadını; Anadolu coğrafyasına ayak basmasından itibaren, var olan ve sonradan var olacak gerek ekonomik, gerekse siyasi hadiseler neticesinde Türkiye Selçuklu Devletinin yıkılışına kadar bir nebze geri planda kalmıştır. Anadolu Beylikleri’nde, Türk kadını eski haklarını ve özgürlüklerini geri almayı başarmıştır. Yeni oluşan siyasi otoriteler arasında yer bulmuştur. Öyle ki yönetime doğrudan katılarak bir bölgenin sorumluluğunu, yani valiliğini üstlenmiştir. Hatunlar bağlı bulundukları siyasal otoritenin hâkimiyetlerini ve devamlılığını sürdürmek için birçok siyasi evliliğe de imza atmış oldukları görülmektedir. Bu evlilikler doğrultusunda iki siyasal güç arasında denge unsuru oluşturmuşlardır. Türk kadınının siyasi varlıkları bunlarla sınırlı kalmamıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • 235On the Trail of Evliya Çelebi's Inscriptions and Graffiti
    235«A mari usque ad mare» Cultura visuale e materiale dall’Adriatico all’India a cura di Mattia Guidetti e Sara Mondini 235On the Trail of Evliya Çelebi’s Inscriptions and Graffiti Mehmet Tütüncü (Research Centre for Turkish and Arabic World, Haarlem, Netherlands) Abstract The Turkish traveller Evliya Çelebi was accustomed to leave a small graffito, or even a skillfully carved inscription, in the places he visited during his long travels across the whole Otto- man World. These traces can be compared with what he recorded in his oceanic Seyahatname and in other writings, a work in progress whose first results are offered in this paper. Summary 1 Introduction. – 2 Inscriptions Written by Evliya Çelebi. – 2.1 The Uyvar (Nové Zámky) Inscriptions. – 2.2 Crete-Kandiye (Heraklion). – 2.3 Zarnata Castle. – 2.4 Mora Zarnata Mosque. – 3 Evliya Çelebi’s Memento Inscriptions (graffiti). – 3.1 Wall and Tree Inscriptions Mentioned in the Seyahatname. – 3.2 Not Mentioned Wall Inscriptions in the Seyahatname. – 3.3 Evliya Çelebi’s Inscription on Pir Ahmed Efendi Mosque. – 3.4 Evliya’s graffito in Pécs (Hungary). Keywords Evliya Çelebi. Ottoman inscriptions. Balkans. I first met Gianclaudio in 2009 in a Symposium about Bektashism in Albania in Tirana (fig. 1). He presented there his findings of the Survey in Delvina, with a focus on the graffiti in the portico of Gjin Aleksi Mosque. On that oc- casion we spoke about the findings and I speculated that this graffiti could be the work of Evliya Çelebi and asked whether I could join him to see and inspect the graffiti.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Doktora Tezi Evliyâ Çelebi'nin Acayip Ve Garip Dünyasi Yeliz Özay Türk Edebiyati Bölümü Ihsan Doğramaci
    DOKTORA TEZİ EVLİYÂ ÇELEBİ’NİN ACAYİP VE GARİP DÜNYASI YELİZ ÖZAY TÜRK EDEBİYATI BÖLÜMÜ İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA EYLÜL 2012 İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi Ekonomi ve Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü EVLİYÂ ÇELEBİ’NİN ACAYİP VE GARİP DÜNYASI YELİZ ÖZAY Türk Edebiyatı Bölümünde Doktora Derecesi Kazanma Yükümlülüklerinin Bir Parçasıdır. Türk Edebiyatı Bölümü İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara Eylül 2012 Bütün hakları saklıdır. Kaynak göstermek koşuluyla alıntı ve gönderme yapılabilir. © Yeliz Özay, 2012 Bu tezi okuduğumu, kapsam ve nitelik bakımından Türk Edebiyatında Doktora derecesi için yeterli bulduğumu beyan ederim. ………………………………………… Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nuran Tezcan Tez Danışmanı Bu tezi okuduğumu, kapsam ve nitelik bakımından Türk Edebiyatında Doktora derecesi için yeterli bulduğumu beyan ederim. ………………………………………… Prof. Talât Halman Tez Jürisi Üyesi Bu tezi okuduğumu, kapsam ve nitelik bakımından Türk Edebiyatında Doktora derecesi için yeterli bulduğumu beyan ederim. ………………………………………… Prof. Dr. Semih Tezcan Tez Jürisi Üyesi Bu tezi okuduğumu, kapsam ve nitelik bakımından Türk Edebiyatında Doktora derecesi için yeterli bulduğumu beyan ederim. ………………………………………… Prof. Dr. Öcal Oğuz Tez Jürisi Üyesi Bu tezi okuduğumu, kapsam ve nitelik bakımından Türk Edebiyatında Doktora derecesi için yeterli bulduğumu beyan ederim. ………………………………………… Yrd. Doç. Dr. Oktay Özel Tez Jürisi Üyesi Ekonomi ve Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü’nün onayı ………………………………………… Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Enstitü Müdürü ÖZET EVLİYÂ ÇELEBİ’NİN ACAYİP VE GARİP DÜNYASI Özay Yeliz Doktora, Türk Edebiyatı Tez Yöneticisi: Doç. Dr. Nuran Tezcan Eylül, 2012 Evliyâ Çelebi, Seyahatnâme’de yineleyerek vurguladığı kimi başlıklarla okurun dikkatini özellikle bazı anlatı kategorilerine çekmektedir. Bu kategorilerden biri de yapıtın kurmaca boyutunun ve Evliyâ’nın “hikâye anlatıcı”lığının tartışılabilmesi için son derece önemli olan acayib ü garayibyani “acayiplikler ve gariplikler”dir.Bu çalışmada, “Evliyâ Çelebi’nin Acayip ve Garip Dünyası”, 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Speech
    II. National Symposium On The Aegean Islands, 2-3 July 2004, Gökçeada - Çanakkale OPENING SPEECH Ali KURUMAHMUT Prime Ministry of Navigation Counsellorship Marine Transportation General Manager The Aegean Sea lies between the Turkish and the Greek main lands, as well as between the Morea peninsular and the southwestern edges of the Anatolian coasts, with the extension of the islands of Çuha, Küçük Çuha, Girit, Kaşot, Kerpe and Rodos that constitute its outer natural boundaries. In terms of the geographical structure, the Aegean, a semi-closed sea, has geological and geo-morphological characteristics peculiar to itself: it has about 1800 islands, islets and rocks of various sorts, as well as a number of geographical formations, scattered al over the Sea. There is little wonder that all these characteristics make the Aegean Sea a special one. The Aegean dispute between Greece and Turkey has been complicated for a number of reasons: for instance, there are many islands in the Aegean that Turkey ceded to Greece through international treaties. And these islands lying in the natural extension of the Turkish mainland surround Anatolia from north to the south. But Athens makes claims of sovereignty over many islands, islets, and rocks though Ankara never ceded any of them to Greece officially. The most obvious and famous case would be the Kardak rocks crisis that erupted between Turkey and Greece at the beginning of 1996. These complications make the Aegean a sea that is of special importance among the seas of the world. It is possible to divide the Aegean Islands into five categories in terms of their geographical locations, geological and geo-morphological characteristics, the historical perspectives of the sovereign powers to which they belonged, the manner in which the sovereignty over them was determined through international treaties, as well as their importance for geo-political and strategic purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from Vidin: a Study of Ottoman Governmentality and Politics of Local Administration, 1864-1877
    LETTERS FROM VIDIN: A STUDY OF OTTOMAN GOVERNMENTALITY AND POLITICS OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, 1864-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Mehmet Safa Saracoglu ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Carter Vaughn Findley, Adviser Professor Jane Hathaway ______________________ Professor Kenneth Andrien Adviser History Graduate Program Copyright by Mehmet Safa Saracoglu 2007 ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the local administrative practices in Vidin County during 1860s and 1870s. Vidin County, as defined by the Ottoman Provincial Regulation of 1864, is the area that includes the districts of Vidin (the administrative center), ‛Adliye (modern-day Kula), Belgradcık (Belogradchik), Berkofça (Bergovitsa), İvraca (Vratsa), Rahova (Rahovo), and Lom (Lom), all of which are located in modern-day Bulgaria. My focus is mostly on the post-1864 period primarily due to the document utilized for this dissertation: the copy registers of the county administrative council in Vidin. Doing a close reading of these copy registers together with other primary and secondary sources this dissertation analyzes the politics of local administration in Vidin as a case study to understand the Ottoman governmentality in the second half of the nineteenth century. The main thesis of this study contends that the local inhabitants of Vidin effectively used the institutional framework of local administration ii in this period of transformation in order to devise strategies that served their interests. This work distances itself from an understanding of the nineteenth-century local politics as polarized between a dominating local government trying to impose unprecedented reforms designed at the imperial center on the one hand, and an oppressed but nevertheless resistant people, rebelling against the insensitive policies of the state on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi………………………………………
    MCBÜ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ Cilt:15, Sayı:1, MART 2017 Geliş Tarihi: 13.02.2017 Doi: 10.18026/cbayarsos.300048 Kabul Tarihi: 21.03.2017 KARAMAN KAZASI’NDA EĞİTİM FAALİYETLERİ (1898-1940) Hamdi DOĞAN1 ÖZET 19. yüzyılın sonu ve 20.yüzyılın başlarında Karaman, Konya Vilayeti’ne bağlı bir kaza merkezidir. 19. Yüzyılın sonlarında ülke genelinde eğitim açısından önemli faaliyetlerinin yapıldığı görülmektedir. Vilayet ve kaza düzeyinde yapılan bu çalışmaların neler olduğu ile ilgili bilgilere salnâmelerden ulaşmak mümkündür. Salnâmeler, düzenlendikleri kurumlardaki yıllık değişiklikleri tespit amacıyla devlet tarafından hazırlanmaktadır. Osmanlı genelinde devlet, nezaret (bakanlık) ve vilayet salnâmeleri tertip edilmiştir Osmanlı Devleti’nin hazırladığı nezaret salnâmelerinden en önemlilerinden biri de kuşkusuz Maârif Salnâmeleri’dir. Bu salnâmeler, basıldığı yılda mevcut olan eğitim kurumları ve bu kurumlardaki eğitime dair bilgileri içermektedir. Bunlar her vilayet ve bu vilayetlere bağlı olan sancak ve kazalarda mevcut olan eğitime dair tüm bilgileri ihtiva etmektedir. Maarif salnamelerinden ilki 1316/1898 tarihinde, sonuncusu da 1321/1903 tarihinde hazırlanmıştır. Sonuncusunun üstünde altıncı sene ibaresi yer almakta ise de bu maarif salnamelerinden ancak 5 adedi (1316, 1317, 1318, 1319 ve 1321) günümüze ulaşmıştır. 1320/1902 senesine ait olan bir salnâme varsa da günümüze ulaşmamıştır. Bu çalışmada Konya Vilayeti’nin Karaman Kazası’nın 1898 ve 1903 yılları arasındaki eğitim durumu vilayet ve maârif salnâmeleri doğrultusunda ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Yine 1922-1923 yıllarında Karaman İdadisi Riyaziye Muallimi Sapancalı Hasan Hüsnü tarafından yazılan yazma eseri ile bu konuyla alakalı diğer araştırma çalışmalarından da istifade edilmiştir. Cumhuriyet dönemi ile ilgili olarak da eğitim-öğretim alanında birçok maarif istatistikleri yayınlanmıştır. Bu istatiklerde okul, öğrenci ve öğretmen sayıları ayrıntılı olarak verilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextualizing an 18 Century Ottoman Elite: Şerđf Halđl Paşa of Şumnu and His Patronage
    CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE by AHMET BĐLALOĞLU Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University 2011 CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülay Artan …………………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Dr. Hülya Adak …………………………. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bratislav Pantelic …………………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: 8 SEPTEMBER 2011 © Ahmet Bilaloğlu, 2011 All rights Reserved ABSTRACT CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18 TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE Ahmet Bilaloğlu History, MA Thesis, 2011 Thesis Supervisor: Tülay Artan Keywords: Şumnu, Şerif Halil Paşa, Tombul Mosque, Şumnu library. The fundamental aim of this thesis is to present the career of Şerif Halil Paşa of Şumnu who has only been mentioned in scholarly research due to the socio-religious complex that he commissioned in his hometown. Furthermore, it is aimed to portray Şerif Halil within a larger circle of elites and their common interests in the first half of the 18 th century. For the study, various chronicles, archival records and biographical dictionaries have been used as primary sources. The vakıfnâme of the socio-religious complex of Şerif Halil proved to be a rare example which included some valuable biographical facts about the patron. Apart from the official posts that Şerif Halil Paşa occupied in the Defterhâne and the Divânhâne , this study attempts to render his patronage of architecture as well as his intellectual interests such as calligraphy and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ® Copyright by Haluk Necdet Goze»* 1967 MODERNISM and TRADITIONALISM in the OTTOMAN Emfrjre 179Q-L£2K
    66-1602 GOZE, Haluk Necdet, 1929- MODERNISM AND TRADITIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 1790-1922. The American University, Ph.D., 1964 Political Science, international law and relations University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ® Copyright by Haluk Necdet Goze»* 1967 MODERNISM AND TRADITIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMfrjRE 179Q-l£2k by tf’.’j» vNecdet G6ze Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND ORGANIZATION Signatures of Committee: Chairman: Date: On*? 'tv. Graduate Dean Dates eyK04j H. I4& V l,BRARY AUG o *KASK»CT3HD.c Soo z. tiu TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE ......................................... v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND....................... 10 The Origins of the Turkish People 10 The Seljuk T u r k s ........................ 11 The Rise of the Ottoman Turks ............. 13 The Decline of the Ottoman Empire ......... 15 Ottoman Institutions .................... 16 III. REFORMS OF SULTAN SELIM III AND THE FAILURE OF THE MODERNISTS......... 31 Early efforts at reform ................ 31 The Reforms of Sultan Selim ......... 37 The Reform of Sultan Mahmud I I ........... 41 Social and Economic Problems • 46 IV. THE RESHID PASHA REFORMS AND THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN MODERNISTS AND TRADITIONALIST 1839-1876 ......................'......... 60 The 1839 Reshid Pasha Reforms and the Temporary Victory of the Modernists .... 60 The Role of the Ottoman Diplomatic Envoys ••••• 68 ill CHAPTER PAGE The Struggle between Modernists and Traditionalists during the Tanzimat Period 1839-1876 ...................... 71 Economic and Social Problems .. ......... 75 Rise of Nationalism .................... 80 The Role of the Ottoman P r e s s ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Buradan Ulaşabilirsiniz
    AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOMUNCU BABA TARİH VE KÜLTÜR ARAŞTIRMALARI UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ YAYINI IV. Uluslararası Aksaray Sempozyumu (24-26 Ekim 2019) ÖZET METİN KİTABI EDİTÖRLER Mehmet Sami YILDIZ Aksaray Üniversitesi, İslami İlimler Fakültesi Ayşegül CAN Aksaray Üniversitesi, Somuncu Baba Tarih ve Kültür Araştırmaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Mehmet ÖZKAYA Aksaray Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi ISBN: 978-605-69519-2-3 Mart 2020 “IV. Uluslararası Aksaray Sempozyumu” isimli kitabın tüm yayın hakları Aksaray Üniversitesi Somuncu Baba Tarih ve Kültür Araştırmaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi’ne ait olup her hakkı saklıdır. Bu yayının hiçbir kısmı, editörlerin önceden yazılı izni olmaksızın çoğaltılamaz, bir geri çağrı sisteminde saklanamaz veya herhangi bir biçimde elektronik veya mekanik, kopyalama, kayıt veya başka yollarla iletilemez. All rights of publication of the book "IV. International Aksaray Symposium" belong to Aksaray University Somuncu Baba History and Culture Research and Practice Center and all rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronical, mechanicalal, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of editors. Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet Sami YILDIZ Sempozyum Başkanı İletişim [email protected] Sekreter Öğr. Gör. Ayşegül CAN (Aksaray Üniversitesi) IV. Uluslararası Aksaray Sempozyumu (24-26 Ekim 2019) 4th. International Aksaray Symposium (24-26 October 2019) Özet Metinler /
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul As a Military Target
    Istanbul as a Military Target Christine Isom-Verhaaren Brigham Young University The Ottomans viewed Istanbul as the ideal capital of their Empire long before its conquest in 1453. However Istanbul both benefitted and suffered from its location on the straits that connect- ed the Mediterranean to the Black Sea. Mehmed II’s rebuilding of the city into a thriving metropolis brought the danger that enemies of the Ottomans would consider access to the city as a military strategy. Istanbul’s large population required an elaborate system of supply to feed the city and sea borne trade was vital for the city’s prosperity.1 This transformed the need for an effective Ottoman naval force from a desirable option to an absolute necessity. The creation and maintenance of effective naval power progressed une- venly from the 1450s with Mehmed II’s creation of a large but not particularly high quality navy. Bayezid II improved the empire’s naval forces through the recruitment of the corsair Kemal Reis as a commander. During the reign of Süleyman, under the former corsair, 1 Colin Imber, “Before the Kapudan Pashas: Sea Power and the Emergence of the Ottoman Empire,” The Kapudan Pasha: His Office and his Domain, Halycon Days in Crete IV, a symposium held in Rethymnon 7-9 January 2000, ed. Elizabeth Zachariadou (Rethymnon: University of Crete Press, 2002), 49-59. 719 OSMANLI ó STANBULU IV Admiral Hayreddin Pasha, Ottoman naval power extended to the western Mediterranean and the shores of Algiers. Hayreddin led the Ottoman navy so effectively that he defeated the combined forces of Venice and Habsburg Spain under the Genoese admiral Andrea Doria at Preveza in 1538.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — a History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89867-6 — A History of the Ottoman Empire Douglas A. Howard Index More Information Index “Bold text denotes reference to figure” Abbas (Shah), 121, 140, 148 Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, tomb of, 70, 90–91 Abbas Hilmi (Khedive), 311 Abu Hanifa, 114 Abbasids, 3, 27, 45, 92, 124, 149 tomb restored, 92 scholars, on end of the world, 53 Abu Taqiyya family, of Cairo, 155 Abd al-Kader al-Gilani, 92, 316 Abu’l-Ghazi Bahadur Khan, of Khiva, 265 Abdülaziz (Sultan), 227, 245, 247, 257–58, Abyssinia, 94 289 Aceh (Sumatra), 203 deposed, 270 Acre, 214, 233, 247 suicide of, 270, 280 Adana, 141, 287, 307 tour of Europe, 264, 266 and rail lines, 287, 307 Abdülhamid I (Sultan), 181, 222, 230–31 French occupation of, 309 Abdülhamid II (Sultan), 227, 270, 278–80, headquarters of Ibrahim at, 247 283–84, 296 in census, 282 and Armenian question, 292 massacre of Armenians in, 296–97 and census, 280 on hajj route, 201, 203 and Macedonian question, 294 Adana, 297 and public ritual, 287 Adana, province of concessions to revolutionaries, 295 cotton boom in, 286–87 deposed, 296 Aden educational reforms of, 287–88 Ottoman conquest of, 105 memoirs about, 280 Admiral of the Fleet, See Kapudan Pasha opposition to, 292–93 Adnan Abdülhak, 319 repression by, 292 Adrianople. See Edirne security apparatus of, 280 Adriatic Sea, 19, 74–76, 111, 155, 174, 186, 234 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 200, 288, 290 and Afro-Eurasian commerce, 74 Abdullah Frères (photographers), 10, 56, 200, Advice for kings genre, 71, 124–25, 150, 262 244 Aegean archipelago
    [Show full text]