DOCSLIB.ORG

Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3 Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others. Words cannot express how grateful I am to my family. My mother for her wise words, calming presence and lovely meals and my father for having stimulated me to study hard and take on challenges such as the writing of a doctoral dissertation, my brothers and sisters, brothers-in-law, nieces and nephews, as well as my girlfriend and her family. They all have made sure that I did not suffer behind my desk and gave me the best moral support a doctoral student can wish for. Indeed, a dissertation cannot take its final shape without the voluntary intellectual and editorial support of family and friends. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Linda Jacobs for her priceless support, who has probed my thesis with an eagle eye for any language mistake. Prof. Dr. Dries Lesage’s knowledgeable comments on the text and editorial work have also proven to be invaluable. Of course, my special thanks goes to my girlfriend, Esther Bloch, for the many inspiring discussions, her understanding and unremitting support. v List of Figures Figure 1: The Orhun Inscriptions carved on a stone pillar. ........................................................... 65 Figure 2: Great Seljuk Sultan Berk Yaruk ibn Malik Shah (r. 1093-1105) ....................................... 71 Figure 3: Silver coins struck by Orhan Gazi (c. 1326). .................................................................... 85 Figure 4: Miniature portrait of Osman Gazi . ................................................................................. 87 Figure 5: Sultan Yıldırım Bâyezid with Molla Şemseddin Fenarî. ............................................... 115 Figure 6: Orhan Gazi gives a composite bow as a gift to the Byzantine prince Kalo-Ioannis. ...... 121 Figure 7: The conscription of Christian boys (devshirme) for the kul institution ....................... 142 Figure 8: The enthronement of Sultan Yıldırım Bâyezid I in Kosovo in 1389. .............................. 147 Figure 9: Miniature portrait of Sultan Murad II. ......................................................................... 159 Figure 10: A Turkish nomadic mounted warrior ........................................................................ 207 Figure 11: Miniature portrait of Sultan Mehmed II ..................................................................... 225 Figure 12: Miniature of the legend about the capture of Aydos Castle ....................................... 267 Figure 13: (left) Sultan Yıldırım Bâyezid I. ................................................................................. 274 Figure 14: (right) Emir Timur Lenk. Timurid period. ................................................................. 274 Figure 15: The Ottoman army on campaign ............................................................................... 284 Figure 16: A scene of feasting at the princely court ................................................................... 345 vii Table of Contents Introduction: Methodology and Conceptual Framework ................................ ...................... 1 Theories of State Formation ................................................................................................... 7 What is a ‘state’? ............................................................................................................. 8 Nomadic State Formation ............................................................................................ 12 The concept of ideology ........................................................................................................ 15 Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) ......................................................................................... 16 Outline of this study ............................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 1 The Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 21 1.1 Early Ottoman Historiography ................................................................................... 21 1.2 Early Ottoman historical texts .................................................................................... 25 1.3 Gazavatname s or Books of Campaign .......................................................................... 27 1.3.1 The Gazavat-ı Sultan Murad bin Mehemmed Han ............................................. 29 1.4 Early Fifteenth-Century Chronicles ........................................................................... 32 1.4.1 Ahmedî (c. 1410) ............................................................................................... 33 1.5 The period of Murad II (r. 1421-1451) ........................................................................ 37 1.5.1 Royal Calendars or Takvims ............................................................................. 39 1.5.2 Anonymous Chronicles .................................................................................... 39 1.6 Chronicles from the period of Mehmed II (1451-1481) ........................................... 43 1.7 Chronicles from the period of Bâyezid II (1481-1512) ............................................. 46 1.7.1 Aşık Paşazade (c. 1480s) ................................................................................... 46 1.7.2 Neşrî (c. 1490s) .................................................................................................. 53 1.7.3 Oruç Beg (c. 1502) ............................................................................................. 56 Chapter 2 Patterns of State Formation in the Early Ottoman Empire, c. 1300 - 1453 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 59 2.1 The world of the steppe ............................................................................................... 59 Those Who Draw the Bow - the Nomad as Empire-Builder ....................... 61 2.2 The Kök Türk Empire ................................................................................................... 63 2.3 The Great Seljuk Empire .............................................................................................. 67 2.4 The Seljuk Rum Sultanate of Anatolia (c. 1080-1308) .............................................. 72 The Disintegration of the Rûm Seljuk Sultanate .......................................... 74 2.5 The Arrival of the Mongols ......................................................................................... 76 ix 2.6 The Emergence of Turkish principalities in Anatolia ............................................. 77 2.7 From Osman’s Beylik (principality) to an Empire (c. 1302-1402) ........................... 82 2.7.1 Before the founding of the Beylik (principality) .......................................... 83 2.7.2 Osman Gazi founds a dynasty and state ........................................................ 84 2.7.3 Early socio-political structures and institutions ......................................... 88 2.7.4 Dynastic marriages ........................................................................................... 90 2.8 The Debate on the Origins and Nature of the Ottoman State ................................ 94 2.8.1 Critical Voices: Giese, Köprülü and the Annales-methode ........................ 95 2.8.2 Wittek’s gazi -thesis ........................................................................................... 96 2.8.3 Critics of Wittek’s thesis ................................................................................ 100 2.8.4 Gaza, Jihad and Holy War .............................................................................. 102 2.9 The Policy of İstimâlet ................................................................................................. 108
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Muhammad Uljaytu's Conversion to Islam Key Terms
    Muhammad Uljaytu’s Conversion to Islam Seyyedeh Samira Behzadi1 After the Mongols’ invasion of Iran, no one could ever imagine that the grand children of Genghis Khan would pave the context for the growth and dissemination of Islam in later periods. Genghis Khan, himself, was a shaman and his grandsons, such as Hulagu Khan and Abaqa Khan, and Abaqa Khan’s children were Buddhists. However, they always dealt with the followers of other religions and sects with respect. The court of Hulagu Khan in Iran was always frequented by the scholars of other religions. Some of the children and grandchildren of Hulagu Khan abandoned their ancestral religion because of the necessities of their time and converted to Islam or Christianity. In this regard, reference can be made to Ghazan Khan and Muhammad Uljaytu who, because of the penetration of Muslim scholars in their courts, paid attention to Islam and Shi’ism. Ghazan Khan chose the Hanafite religion but did not formally acknowledge his conversion to Shi’ism for certain political reasons. Muhammad Uljaytu, his brother, persuaded the king to follow Shi’ism more openly for several reasons including the penetration of some Muslim scholars and Shi’iteministers and rulers, such as Allamah al-Hilli, his son Fakhr ul- Muhaqqiqin, and Amir TarmTaz, in his court and their arguments as to the superiority of Shi’ism over Sunnism. Uljaytu chose the Twelver branch of Shi’ism and, at the sometime, issued the order of reading sermons in Friday prayers in the name of the Shi’ite Imams (a) and minting coins in their names.
    [Show full text]
  • Kay 492 Turkish Administrative History Week 5: Seljuk Empire + Emergence of Turks in World History Ortaylı, Pp
    Kay 492 Turkish Administrative History Week 5: Seljuk Empire + Emergence of Turks in World History Ortaylı, pp. 97-110 Emergence of Turks in History • Pre-Islamic Turkish tribes were influential • in Central Asia and Maveraünnehir (between Amudarya/ Seyhun and Syrderya/Ceyhun rivers), Caucasus, near Volga river and Near East • The Turks began to accept Islam from the 10th century and became an important force in the history of the Middle East • The mission of "being the sword of Islam" The Islamic World before the Seljuks • At the end of the 9th Century, Muslims dominated the Mediterranean • By the same time, the Eastern Roman Empire had (re)strengthened and entered an era of conquest • In Sicily, a cultural environment was created where Islam and Eastern Rome civilizations have merged • Islamic conquests came to a halt in the 10th Century, and a period of disintegration began with the Abbasids • Both the Andalusia (Umayyad Caliphate) and local dynasties in North Africa, Syria & Egypt have proclaimed independence • In 945 the Shiite Buveyhis became the protectors of the Abbasid Caliph in Baghdad The Islamic World before the Seljuks • Recovery in the Christian world • The Eastern Roman Empire has gained strength again in the 10th Century • Conquests in Crete, Cyprus and Syria • Normans took southern Italy and Sicily from the Arabs • The Crusaders went to Jerusalem and Palestine • Jerusalem fell in 1099 • Christian conquests in Andalusia • The spread of the Islamic religion has stopped • Christianity spread among the pagan peoples of Northern
    [Show full text]
  • KFOS LOCAL and INTERNATIONAL VOLUME II.Pdf
    EDITED BY IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA LOCAL AND AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER- SIEVERS INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD VOLUME II LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD —VOLUME II EDITED BY: IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER-SIEVERS Copyright ©2021 Kosovo Foundation for Open Society. All rights reserved. PUBLISHER: Kosovo Foundation for Open Society Imzot Nikë Prelaj, Vila 13, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo. Issued in print and electronic formats. “Local and International Determinants of Kosovo’s Statehood: Volume II” EDITORS: Ioannis Armakolas Agon Demjaha Arolda Elbasani Stephanie Schwandner-Sievers PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Lura Limani Designed by Envinion, printed by Envinion, on recycled paper in Prishtina, Kosovo. ISBN 978-9951-503-06-8 CONTENTS ABOUT THE EDITORS 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 12 INTRODUCTION 13 CULTURE, HERITAGE AND REPRESENTATIONS 31 — Luke Bacigalupo Kosovo and Serbia’s National Museums: A New Approach to History? 33 — Donjetë Murati and Stephanie Schwandner- Sievers An Exercise in Legitimacy: Kosovo’s Participation at 1 the Venice Biennale 71 — Juan Manuel Montoro Imaginaries and Media Consumptions of Otherness in Kosovo: Memories of the Spanish Civil War, Latin American Telenovelas and Spanish Football 109 — Julianne Funk Lived Religious Perspectives from Kosovo’s Orthodox Monasteries: A Needs Approach for Inclusive Dialogue 145 LOCAL INTERPRETATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL RULES 183 — Meris Musanovic The Specialist Chambers in Kosovo: A Hybrid Court between
    [Show full text]
  • Mongol Aristocrats and Beyliks in Anatolia
    MONGOL ARISTOCRATS AND BEYLIKS IN ANATOLIA. A STUDY OF ASTARĀBĀDĪ’S BAZM VA RAZM* Jürgen Paul Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Abstract This paper is about beyliks – political entities that include at least one town (or a major fortress or both), its agricultural hinterland and a (large) amounts of pasture. It is also about Mongols in Anatolia in the beylik period (in particular the second half of the 14th century) and their leading families some of whom are presented in detail. The paper argues that the Eretna sultanate, the Mongol successor state in Anatolia, underwent a drawn-out fission process which resulted in a number of beyliks. Out of this number, at least one beylik had Mongol leaders. Besides, the paper argues that Mongols and their leading families were much more important in this period than had earlier been assumed. arge parts of Anatolia came under Mongol rule earlier than western Iran. The Mongols had won a resounding victory over the Rum L Seljuqs at Köse Dağ in 1243, and Mongols then started occupying winter and summer pastures in Central and Eastern Anatolia, pushing the Turks and Türkmens to the West and towards the coastal mountain ranges. Later, Mongol Anatolia became part of the Ilkhanate, and this province was one of the focal points of Ilkhanid politics and intrigues.1 The first troops, allegedly three tümens, had already been dispatched to Anatolia by ———— * Research for this paper was conducted in the framework of Sonderforschungsbereich 586 (“Differenz und Integration”, see www.nomadsed.de), hosted by the universities at Halle-Wittenberg and Leipzig and funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Translation and Historical Commentary of Book One and Book Two of the Historia of Geōrgios Pachymerēs” 2004
    “A Translation and Historical Commentary of Book One and Book Two of the Historia of Geōrgios Pachymerēs” Nathan John Cassidy, BA(Hons) (Canterbury) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia. School of Humanities Classics and Ancient History 2004 ii iii Abstract A summary of what a historical commentary should aim to do is provided by Gomme and Walbank in the introductions to their famous and magisterial commentaries on Thoukydidēs and Polybios. From Gomme: A historical commentary on an historian must necessarily derive from two sources, a proper understanding of his own words, and what we can learn from other authorities . To see what gaps there are in his narrative [and to] examine the means of filling these gaps. (A. Gomme A Historical Commentary on Thucydides vol. 1 (London, 1959) 1) And from Walbank: I have tried to give full references to other relevant ancient authorities, and where the text raises problems, to define these, even if they could not always be solved. Primarily my concern has been with whatever might help elucidate what Polybius thought and said, and only secondarily with the language in which he said it, and the question whether others subsequently said something identical or similar. (F. Walbank A Historical Commentary on Polybius vol. 1 (London, 1957) vii) Both scholars go on to stress the need for the commentator to stick with the points raised by the text and to avoid the temptation to turn the commentary into a rival narrative. These are the principles which I have endeavoured to follow in my Historical Commentary on Books One and Two of Pachymerēs’ Historia.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkomans Between Two Empires
    TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) A Ph.D. Dissertation by RIZA YILDIRIM Department of History Bilkent University Ankara February 2008 To Sufis of Lāhijan TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RIZA YILDIRIM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Halil Đnalcık Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Yaşar Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANZ UND DAS ABENDLAND V. STUDIA BYZANTINO-OCCIDENTALIA Antiquitas • Byzantium • Renascentia XXXII
    ANTIQUITAS • BYZANTIUM • RENASCENTIA XXXII. BYZANZ UND DAS ABENDLAND V. Studia ANT I U Byzantino-Occidentalia YZ M B R E S N A A T S I C U E N Q I T T I A Studia Byzantino-Occidentalia N A MMXIII BYZANZ UND DAS ABENDLAND V: EÖTVÖS-JÓZSEF-COLLEGIUM ELTE BYZANZ UND DAS ABENDLAND V. STUDIA BYZANTINO-OCCIDENTALIA Antiquitas • Byzantium • Renascentia XXXII. Herausgegeben von Zoltán Farkas László Horváth Tamás Mészáros Eötvös-József-Collegium 2018 Byzanz und das Abendland V. Studia Byzantino-Occidentalia Herausgegeben von Erika Juhász Eötvös-József-Collegium Budapest 2018 Der vorliegende Band konnte im Rahmen des Nationales Forschungs-, Entwicklungs- und Innovationsbüro – NKFIH-Forschungsprojekts ,,Társadalmi kontextus a szövegkritika tükrében: Bizáncon innen és túl“ (NN 124539) und des vom Ministerium für Nationale Ressourcen unterstützten Projekts für ungarische Fachkollegien NTP-SZKOLL-17-0025 realisiert werden. Verantwortlicher Herausgeber: László Horváth, Direktor des Eötvös-József-Collegiums Anschrift: ELTE Eötvös-József-Collegium H-1118 Budapest, Ménesi út 11-13 © Eötvös-József-Collegium und die einzelnen VerfasserInnen, 2018 Alle Rechte vorbehalten ISBN 978-615-5371-91-2 ISSN 2064-2369 Druck: Pátria Nyomda Zrt. 1117 Budapest, Hunyadi János út 7 Generaldirektorin: Katalin Orgován Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort ....................................................................................................................... 11 Peter Schreiner Der Koloman-Palast in Konstantinopel und die Árpáden ..........................13 Hermann Harrauer
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction This book seeks to narrate one part of one of the longest wars in European his- tory. Armed conflict between the Kingdom of Hungary and the nascent Otto- man Empire started in the late fourteenth century and only ended in the early eighteenth, or, in a sense, even later. By then, Hungary had been territorially dismembered for 150 years, with one part of the medieval kingdom integrated into the Habsburg Empire, another under direct Ottoman rule, and the third forming a semi-independent state under Ottoman suzerainty. It is the second half of this long period (1526–1686) that is traditionally examined under the rubric of “Hungary in the Ottoman era.” Yet the period explored in this study, ending with the battle of Mohács on 29 August 1526, deserves the adjective “Ottoman” no less, even if at that time it was a still independent and undivided Kingdom of Hungary that opposed an ever mightier Ottoman Empire. From the very first appearance of Turkish raiders on Hungarian soil, the menace rep- resented by the new conquerors loomed so large over Hungary as to gradually subsume all other aspects of foreign and domestic politics. Fighting against the Ottomans became the single most important aim of successive kings and gov- ernments, even if the ways and means they chose to do so varied constantly. Alongside narrating events, this book also seeks to explain their course and changing features in terms of the specific social and military structures of the rival powers. Warfare between the Ottomans and the Hungarians had nothing of the chivalric gallantry that saved the lives of kings John of France at Poitiers in 1356 and Francis i of France at Pavia in 1525.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Empire Earth TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Installation...............................................................................................5 Installing Empire Earth ..........................................................................................................5 Tips to Improve Game Performance ......................................................................................6 Prehistoric (500,000 – 50,000 BC) ............................................................................8 Chapter II: What is Empire Earth? ......................................................................10 The Emergence of Empires ..................................................................................................10 Your Role in Empire Earth...............................................................................................11 Features of Empire Earth......................................................................................................12 Stone Age (50,000 – 5,000 BC)................................................................................14 Chapter III: Starting Empire Earth ......................................................................16 Launching the Game ............................................................................................................16 Main Menu ...........................................................................................................................16 Learning to Play ...................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between Akkoyunlu and Karamanogullari
    RELATIONS BETWEEN AKKOYUNLUS AND KARAMANOGULLARI Ilhan ERDEM (University of Ankara, Turkey) Karamanogullari, one of the largest groups among those Turkish communities who lived in Anatolia, immigrated to Anatolia in the first half of the 13th century and settled in the southern parts of Toros Region, Ermenek Mut, Larende, etc., where they became a sovereign power in a short time and left their marks on the political, ethical and cultural areas. Their crowdedness and sound organizational structure distracted the attention of Seljuk Government, and Turkish Seljuks availed themselves of Karamans as a military power for their invasion raids. However, Karamans ran counter to the Government following the death of Aladdin Keykubad, which resulted in the Mogulian invasion of Anatolia (July, 1243 AD). As the Mogulian sovereignty lessened the central authority of Turkish Seljuks, the balance of political powers in Anatolia began to re-shape. Turkmens proceeded to take action on the one hand, while the decentralized feudal aristocracy gained power in the state on the other. Karamans were the first group who took action for independence and fought against Moguls. In 1256, the process of establishment of principalities was completely carried out with the besiegement of Ermenek by IV Kilij Arslan, the Sultan of Seljuks in that period. Karaman Beg (1256-61), the founder of the principality had it as a motto to fight against Moguls, and with this slogan, made a raid on Konya in 1261, in the name of the overthrown Sultan İzzeddin Keykavus. However, the alerted Seljuk-Mogulian forces blocked them in front of the Castle Gevele, and here Turkmens lost the battle.
    [Show full text]