Nutshell 2009-63-04.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nutshell 2009-63-04.Indd Searching for Resistance to Eastern Filbert Blight: Hazelnuts from the Republic of Georgia the moderate climate of the Willamette Thomas Molnar1 and Michele Pisetta2 Valley is well suited to cultivars from 1Plant Biology and Pathology Department Europe. Rutgers University, 59 Dudley Road Our native American hazelnuts, C. New Brunswick, NJ 08901 americana, and its cousin the beaked [email protected] hazel, C. cornuta, are very resistant to 2Hazelnut Business Development - R&D EFB, due to having evolved alongside Ferrero S.p.A., Piazzale P. Ferrero 1 the fungus that causes the disease over 12051 ALBA (Cuneo), Italy millennia. While the American spe- [email protected] cies can be productive, their tiny, thick- shelled nuts do not compete with their European relative and for the most part azelnuts are a favorite nut crop gia), and chestnuts (Castanea spp.). have only been harvested from the wild of many NNGA members. The The top hazelnut producing country H for local consumption. Corylus ameri- plants are adapted to a wide range of in the world is Turkey, which gener- cana can be found growing over a wide climates and soils and their smaller ally produces more than 70 percent of area of eastern North America, and be- stature makes them suitable for back- the world’s crop (776,890 metric tons cause of its ability to harbor non-lethal yard orchards. They are easy to grow in 2007). Turkey is followed by Italy, EFB infections it acts as a reservoir of and harvest and require relatively little which produces around 17-20 percent inoculum to infect European hazelnuts in terms of pesticides or other chemical of the total, and then the U.S., which planted across its range. Fortunately, it inputs to produce tasty crops of nuts. produces less than five percent. Other also acts as a pool of genetic resources Currently, there is renewed interest in producing countries include Spain, useful for breeding EFB resistant, cold- growing them for personal consump- Georgia, Azerbaijan, Iran, France, hardy hybrid hazels, as demonstrated tion, as well as for large-scale produc- Greece, Russia and China (FaoStat, by the early successes of J.F. Jones, tion across much of the eastern U.S. 2009). G.H. Slate, C. Weschcke and others and southern Canada. There are now As many NNGA members already when crossing C. americana with culti- hazelnut breeding programs located at know, a native fungal disease called vars of C. avellana (Crane et al., 1937; Oregon State University (OSU) and Eastern Filbert Blight (EFB), caused Weschcke, 1954; Slate, 1969; Rutter, Rutgers University, as well as hazelnut by Anisogramma anomala, makes most 1987). However, when C. americana research underway at the University of European hazelnut cultivars nearly im- is used as a parent in breeding, it takes Nebraska, Lincoln, Minnesota State possible to grow across much of North several generations (amounting to many University, the University of Guelph, America, the only continent where this decades) to recover EFB-resistant, and the Arbor Day Foundation. disease is found. The European ha- cold-hardy hybrid plants with nut quali- The European hazelnut, Corylus zelnut is very susceptible to EFB and ties and yields suitable for commercial avellana, is the most coveted of the the disease is blamed for why there production. For example, the early first Corylus genus because of its large, has been no commercial production generation hybrids developed by Slate, thin-shelled nuts. It is an economically of hazelnuts in the eastern U.S. in the while suitable for backyard produc- valuable crop, ranking fifth in world past. Conversely, commercial hazelnut tion, did not produce consistent yields tree nut production behind cashews production has thrived in the Pacific of high-quality kernels in the amounts (Anacardium occidentale), almonds Northwest, as EFB was not found in needed to support a commercially vi- (Prunus dulcis), walnuts (Juglans re- this region until relatively recently and 16 THE NUTSHELL, December 2009 able industry (Slate, 1961). Further the acreage of hazelnut orchards in the bazaars, road side stands, research sta- generations of breeding were needed. Willamette Valley is increasing for the tions and botanical gardens. Over 4,000 While work to develop advanced gen- first time in decades. The power of nuts were brought back to Rutgers, with eration C. avellana x C. americana systematic plant breeding is clearly vi- a comparable group brought back to hybrids continues at Oregon State sualized when comparing the poor nut OSU. From this collection, over 1,200 University, Rutgers University and at quality of ‘Gasaway’ with that of the seedlings were grown at Rutgers and several private nurseries, it will likely new excellent quality EFB resistant re- inoculated with spores of A. anomala. be a decade or more before a suitable leases. This breeding success at OSU, In less than four years, a large major- proven hybrid cultivar is released to the besides saving the U.S. hazelnut indus- ity of these plants quickly succumbed public for commercial production. try, provides much tangible evidence to to the disease. However, after several One way to speed development of demonstrate the genetic improvement more years of continued evaluation and EFB resistant commercial quality ha- potential of Corylus, a genus that has constant disease pressure in the field, zelnuts is to search for resistance within undergone very little breeding and con- we were successful in identifying a the European species itself. While in tains a great deal of genetic diversity. small number that were highly resistant general the species is highly suscep- This evidence greatly bolsters enthusi- (Molnar et al., 2007). To our surprise, tible, rare plants exist that are resistant asm to develop improved C. avellana several of these plants produced large to EFB, as demonstrated by the obso- and hybrid hazelnuts for colder regions nuts of relatively high quality repre- lete pollinizer C. avellana ‘Gasaway’. across North America. senting great improvement over those While ‘Gasaway’ produces low yields The identification of ‘Gasaway’ from ‘Gasaway’ (Fig. 1). of very tiny, poor quality nuts (mak- spurred the search for other resistant We are currently using our best re- ing it a less than ideal parent in terms C. avellana cultivars and selections to sistant Russian plants in controlled of nut characteristics), it was the first provide a diversity of resistance genes crosses with pollen from elite but EFB and only source of C. avellana resis- to combat EFB. Shawn Mehlenbacher susceptible hazelnuts from the OSU tance identified at a time when hazelnut and his team at OSU closely evalu- breeding program. Our goal is to con- production in Washington and Oregon ated much of the large Corylus germ- currently investigate how the resistance was being devastated by EFB after plasm collection at the USDA Clonal genes are transmitted to the next gener- its inadvertent introduction in the late Germplasm Repository in Corvallis, ation while also working towards rapid- 1960s. ‘Gasaway’ was shown to carry Oregon, as well as their own diverse ly developing new resistant plants with a dominant allele at a single locus that collections, for resistance to this dis- much improved nut quality. This work transmits EFB resistance to its progeny ease. By developing and using both was funded in part by a NNGA research (Mehlenbacher and Thompson, 1991). greenhouse and field inoculation tech- grant. We hope that by identifying and Simply stated, ‘Gasaway’ transmits a niques, they were successful in identi- using EFB resistant parents that have gene for EFB resistance to fifty-per- fying a number of plants that did not decent nut size and quality, crossed cent of its offspring. Due to its predict- succumb to EFB, with several repre- with parents having excellent nut qual- able inheritance, a concerted effort was senting improvements over ‘Gasaway’ ity from the OSU breeding program, we made at OSU to use ‘Gasaway’ and its in many respects (Coyne et al., 1998; will produce improved EFB-resistant offspring in controlled crosses to devel- Lunde et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2005 & offspring in a shorter period of time op improved EFB resistant C. avellana 2007). They are currently using the best compared to the work with ‘Gasaway’. cultivars. While EFB resistance was of these resistant plants in their breed- From our efforts, we now have over inherited in a simple manner, the poor ing program to develop future releases one thousand plants in the greenhouse nut quality of ‘Gasaway’ still required for the Oregon hazelnut industry. and field representing the first genera- several generations of breeding, equat- Following the successful approach tion of new hybrids from these Russian ing to over 30 years, to finally develop of OSU, in 2002 a trip was made to parents. We also have several thousand EFB resistant plants that produce high southern Russia and the Crimean pen- hybrid seeds in stratification from simi- yields and kernels of proper quality for insula of Ukraine to collect hazelnut lar crosses made in 2009 that will be commercial markets. Nevertheless, germplasm to search for additional germinated and grown at Rutgers, as the most recent OSU introductions sources of EFB resistance and other well as at OSU and the University of (‘Yamhill’ for the kernel market and traits needed for breeding efforts in the Nebraska, Lincoln. ‘Jefferson’ for the inshell market,) as U.S. This was the first time hazelnuts Based on the success of the Russian well as several new compatible polliniz- were collected from this region for collection, we recently initiated a new ers, can be credited for revitalizing the evaluation on such a large scale. Nuts project to identify resistant plants from hazelnut industry in Oregon. Currently, were collected from local markets and a different geographic location to add THE NUTSHELL, December 2009 17 cause most of the hazelnuts collected in Georgia were purposely selected from plants with above average to excellent nut quality, with many having round, well-filled kernels with a high ratio of kernel to shell.
Recommended publications
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    KAKHETI WINE MAP Akhmeta, Telavi, Gurjaani, Kvareli, Lagodekhi I GEORGIA o Abkhazia Svaneti 0 10 20 40 KM Racha-Lechkhumi Kvemo Svaneti Mtskheta Samegrelo Tskhinvali Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI Guria Imereti Shida Kartli TELAVI BATUMI KAKHETI Ajara Samtskhe TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo kartli Viticultural Districts White Wine vazis gavrcelebis areali TeTri Rvino Winegrowing Centre Amber Wine mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera qarvisferi Rvino Qvevri making Centre * NAPAREULI PDO qvevris warmoebis kera Fortified Wine Semagrebuli Rvino Red Wine TELIANI PDO wiTeli Rvino * *Red Semisweet Wine KINDZMARAULI PDO Maghraani wiTeli Pshaveli naxevradtkbili Matani Kvemo Artana Rvino alvani AKHMETA Naphareuli KVARELI PDO Zemo Gremi alvani Shilda Eniseli Ikalto KVARELI Kurdghelauri Vardisubani Kondoli Akhalsopeli KAKHETI PDO TELAVI Tsinandali Akura Chikaani Kalauri Gavazi LAGODEKHI TSINANDALI Protected Vazisubani Velistsikhe Designation of Origin Mukuzani Akhasheni Chumlaki VAZISUBANI PDO GURJAANI KOTEKHI PDO Bakurtsikhe Kardenakhi MUKUZANI PDO Kachreti * Chalaubani AKHASHENI PDO KARDENAKHI PDO * Major Grapes of Kakheti GURJAANI PDO yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi Rkatsiteli, Saperavi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Khikhvi, Kisi rqawiTeli, saferavi, mwvane kaxuri, xixvi, qisi Saperavi, Rkatsiteli, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Kisi, Khikhvi saferavi, rqawiTeli, wvane kaxuri, qisi, xixvi Rkatsiteli, Kisi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Saperavi rqawiTeli, qisi, mwvane kaxuri, saferavi Other Varieties sxva jiSebi White: Kakhuri Mtsvivani, Grdzelmtevana, Vardispheri Rkatsiteli, Kurmi, Tetri Mirzaanuli, Ghrubela, Chitistvala, Saphena TeTri: kaxuri mcvivani, grZelmtevana, vardisferi rqawiTeli, kumsi, TeTri mirzaanuli, Rrubela, CitisTvala, safena Red: Tsiteli Budeshuri, Kumsi Tsiteli, Ikaltos Tsiteli, Kharistvala, Zhghia wiTeli: wiTeli budeSuri, kumsi wiTeli, iyalTos wiTeli, xarisTvala, JRia Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © NATIONAL WINE AGENCY © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012
    R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Technological Characteristics of Georgian Wine and Table Grapes
    BIO Web of Conferences 5, 01012 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20150501012 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Biological and technological characteristics of Georgian wine and table grapes Levan Ujmajuridze and Londa Mamasakhlisashvili LEPL Scientific-Research Center of Agriculture, 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave., 0159 Tbilisi, and Georgia Abstract. Georgian grapevine germplasm, which has formed for thousands of years, includes white, black, red, pink and grey 525 Vitis vinifera cultivars. In 2009–2014 up to 440 local grapevine varieties Vitis vinifera sativa has been restored. These varieties are cultivated in the LEPL Agriculture Scientific-Research Center grapevine collection GEO 038, Mtskheta Munisipal, village Jighaura, at an altitude 550 m. There are retrieved and recorded in the collection up to 60 forms of Vitis vinifera silvestris. In order to study biological and technological characteristics of Georgian grapevine, in 2012–2014 were investigated 50 Georgian widely cultivated white and colored wine and table grapes varieties, in the seven viticulture regions of Georgia. Description of grapevine varieties implemented through the descriptors for grapevine (IPGRI OIV). Botanical, biological- technological, qualitative and quantitative marks are characterized and evaluated. Investigation conducted during the biologic development phases were studied for chemical and eno-carpological characteristics. History of grapevine culture is strongly connected with Phonological development of phases studied and their the history of Georgian nation. Creation and formation technological properties were studied based on grapes juice of local rich assortment was due to the longest cultivation chemical indicators and eno-carpological characteristics. period that made Georgia one of the leading country. The studied varieties were distinguished for middle and Mobilization and conservation of genetic resources high fertility of basal buds.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification and Development in the Kakheti Food and Agriculture Sector
    DIVERSIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE KAKHETI FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SECTOR Background and Recommendations Preparation Team: Editor/Author David Land Authors of Background Papers Lasha Dolidze, Team Leader Ana Godabrelidze, Grapes and Wine Konstantin Kobakhidze, Food Processing and Distribution Beka Tagauri, Primary Production, Processing, and Distribution Data Research Assistant Irene Mekerishvili UNDP Sophie Kemkhadze, Assistant Resident Representative George Nanobashvili, Economic Development Team Leader Vakhtang Piranishvili, Kakheti Regional Development Project Manager The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UNDP. This document is prepared and published with UNDP technical and financial support. Preparation of the document made possible with the financial contribution of the Romanian Government CONTENTS Table of Contents MESSAGE FROM UNDP RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE ....................................................... 4 MESSAGE FROM MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE OF GEORGIA .......................................... 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 2. A REVIEW OF PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ........................... 12 CHAPTER 3. GRAPES AND WINE PRODUCTION ................................................................. 60 CHAPTER 4. AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING: STATUS AND OUTLOOK FOR GEORGIA .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Agri-Resource Potential of West Georgia and Landscape Zoning for Dissemination Actinidia
    Earth Science s 2015; 4(5-1): 104-107 Published online July 27, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/earth) doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2015040501.29 ISSN: 2328-5974 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5982 (Online) Assessment of Agri-Resource Potential of West Georgia and Landscape Zoning for Dissemination Actinidia Seperteladze Zurab 1, Davitaia Eter 1, Memarne Guram 2, Khalvashi Neli 3, Gaprindashvili George 4 1 Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Institute of Phytopathology and Biodiversity, Batumi, Georgia 3Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Institute of Phytopathology and Biodiversity, Division of Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation, Batumi, Georgia 4Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Institute of Geography, Tbilisi, Georgia Email address: [email protected] (S. Zurab), [email protected] (D. Eter), [email protected] (M. Guram), [email protected] (K. Neli), [email protected] (G. George) To cite this article: Seperteladze Zurab, Davitaia Eter, Memarne Guram, Khalvashi Neli, Gaprindashvili George. Assessment of Agri-Resource Potential of West Georgia and Landscape Zoning for Dissemination Actinidia. Earth Sciences. Special Issue: Modern Problems of Geography and Anthropology. Vol. 4, No. 5-1, 2015, pp. 104-107. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2015040501.29 Abstract: The methodology has been developed and established in West Georgia for agro-resource potential spatial distribution regularities for ACTINIDIA (according to hypsometric levels and types of landscapes of Georgia). On the basis of a large amount of data processing and systematization, also different data scattered in various scientific-research organizations agri-resource potential of West Georgia were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Report Envisaged by the Project On
    Geological Report envisaged by the Project on “Development of climate resilient flood and flash flood and geological disaster management practices for Rioni river basin”. prohibitio1 garemos erovnuli saagento Content 1. Topicality of the problem (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 3 2. Overview of state of affairs in Georgia from the standpoint of geological disasters (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 5 3. Key factors causing development of natural disasters and assessment methodology (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 18 3.1 Impact of geological composition and properties of stratum on development-reactivation of geological processes (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 20 3.2 The role of geomorphological factors in development of exogenic and geological processes and preparation of forecasts (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 28 3.3 The role of climatic-meteorological factors in development of landslide-gravitational and mudslide processes (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 32 4. Principles of development of mudslide and landslide risk assessment map for Rioni river basin (E.M. Tsereteli, M. Gaprindashvili) 44 5. Mudslide and landslide prevention measures (I. Chkeidze) 49 6. The risk of development of landslides and mudslides by municipalities 55 6.1 Oni Municipality (O. Abutidze, O. Kurtsikidze) 55 6.2 Ambrolauri Municipality (O. Abutidze, O. Kurtsikidze) 84 6.3 Forecasts on development of disastrous geological processes on the territories of Oni and Ambrolauri Municipalities (O. Abutidze, O. Kurtsikidze) 121 6.4 Lentekhi Municipality (Z. Dolidze, Z. Maisuradze) 122 6.5 Tsageri Municipality (Z. Dolidze, Z. Maisuradze) 147 6.6Forecasts on development of disastrous geological processes on the territories of Lentekhi and Tsageri Municipalities (Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability Assessment of Selected Semi-Arid Regions And
    Identification and implementation of adaptation response to Climate Change impact for Conservation and Sustainable use of agro‐biodiversity in arid and semi‐arid ecosystems of South Caucasus Vulnerability Assessment of Selected Semi‐Arid Regions and Agrobiodiversity to Climate Change in Georgia Tbilisi, 2012 1 Contents 1. Intoduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Overviw of Selected Areas ............................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Kareli and Gori Municipalities ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Gardabani Municipality ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Sagarejo Municipality ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Dedophlistskaro Municipality ................................................................................................................ 14 3. Agricultural sector development in the selected semi‐arid areas .............................................................. 17 3.1. Kareli and Gori Municipalities ............................................................................................................... 18 3.2. Gardabani Municipality
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana greece lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada grenada lesotho liberia norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic guatemala libya oman sudan andorra chad guinea liechtenstein pakistan palau suriname angola chile guinea-bissau lithuania palestina swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guyana luxembourg panama sweden argentina colombia haiti macau papuanewguinea switzerland macedonia armenia comoros honduras paraguay peru syria madagascar aruba congo hongkong philippines taiwan malawi australia costarica hungary poland portugal tajikistan malaysia austria croatia iceland qatar romania tanzania maldives mali azerbaijan cuba india russia malta thailand bahama curacao indonesia marshallislands rwanda timor-leste bahrain cyprus iran iraq mauritania saintlucia togo tonga bangladesh czechia ireland mauritius samoa trinidadandtobago barbados denmark israel italy mexico sanmarino tunisia turkey belarus djibouti dominica jamaica micronesia saudiarabia turkmenistan belgium dominicanrepublic japan moldova senegal serbia tuvalu uganda seychelles belize ecuador egypt jordan monaco ukraine sierraleone benin elsalvador kazakhstan mongolia unitedarabemirates singapore bhutan equatorialguinea kenya montenegro uk england sintmaarten birma eritrea kiribati morocco unitedkingdom slovakia bolivia estonia northkorea mozambique uruguay slovenia bosniaandherzegovina korea namibia nauru uzbekistan ethiopia solomonislands botswana brazil southkorea nepal vatikan
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Status Report of Vitis Germplasm in GEORGIA David Maghradze
    Status Report of Vitis germplasm in GEORGIA David Maghradze Institute of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology Georgian Agricultural University, 13 km. David Aghmashenebeli Alley. 0131. Tbilisi. Georgia 1. Importance of the Viticulture in the country According to the last national Agro Census (2004) there were 37419 ha of vineyards in Georgia in 2004. The total production of grapes in Georgia is given below: Grape production (Mt) in Georgia during last 20 years 1992 328000 1993 352334 1994 284500 1995 422400 1996 311300 1997 309100 1998 234496 1999 220000 2000 210000 2001 150000 2002 90000 2003 200000 2004 180000 2005 250294 2006 162500 2007 227300 2008 175800 2009 150100 2010 120700 2011 159600 Sources: http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/en/ http://geostat.ge/index 1 Fig 1. Grape production in Georgia in the last 20 years Fig. 2. Grape production in Georgia during the 21st century Most of the grapes are used for wine making purposes. Few are table grapes (about 1%). There are not made raisin in the country. 2 2. Collections or germplasm banks for Vitis Table 1. The main grape collections in Georgia Collection Year of Total no. Old Vitis Other Rootstocks Interspecific planting of local Vinifera Vitis hybrids accessions varieties species Skra 2 2008 440 440 440 0 0 0 Vachebi 2008 312 312 312 0 7 0 Telavi 2 2008 573 500 573 5 0 0 Jighaura 2008 780 500 780 0 8 0 Shumi 2006 271 179 271 0 0 0 Kindzmarauli 2005 400 400 400 0 0 0 Telavi 1 1987 146 146 146 0 0 0 Mukhrani 1986 181 181 181 0 0 0 Skra 1 1972 75 38 75 0 0 0 Number of plants per accessions of local varieties varies from 10 to 20 and for foreign varieties varies from 20 to 400 Holder of all collections are private bodies: Agricultural University, wineries, charity Centre The ‘Dighomi’ collection, planted in 1967-68 and available in 2003 not exist more Six new collections have been planted in Georgia since 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Biodiversity for Future Viticulture
    fpls-12-630122 January 30, 2021 Time: 18:30 # 1 REVIEW published: 05 February 2021 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.630122 Georgian Grapevine Cultivars: Ancient Biodiversity for Future Viticulture Maryam Sargolzaei1, Laura Rustioni2, Gabriele Cola1, Valentina Ricciardi1, Piero A. Bianco1, David Maghradze3,4, Osvaldo Failla1, Fabio Quaglino1, Silvia L. Toffolatti1* and Gabriella De Lorenzis1* 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy, 2 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed Ambientali, Università del Salento – Centro Ecotekne, Lecce, Italy, 3 Faculty of Viticulture Edited by: and Winemaking, Caucasus International University, Tbilisi, Georgia, 4 National Wine Agency of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia Chiara Pastore, University of Bologna, Italy Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is one of the most widely cultivated plant species of agricultural Reviewed by: Goran Zdunic, interest, and is extensively appreciated for its fruits and the wines made from its fruits. Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Considering the high socio-economic impact of the wine sector all over the world, in Reclamation, Croatia Annarita Marrano, recent years, there has been an increase in work aiming to investigate the biodiversity University of California, Davis, of grapevine germplasm available for breeding programs. Various studies have shed United States light on the genetic diversity characterizing the germplasm from the cradle of V. vinifera Javier Tello, Institute of Vine and Wine Sciences domestication in Georgia (South Caucasus). Georgian germplasm is placed in a distinct (ICVV), Spain cluster from the European one and possesses a rich diversity for many different traits, *Correspondence: including eno-carpological and phenological traits; resistance to pathogens, such as Silvia L.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    SHIDA KARTLI WINE MAP G E O R GIA vazis gavrcelebis areali Abkhazia Winegrowing Centre Svaneti H mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera Racha-Lechkhumi ** White Sparkling Wine Kvemo Svaneti TeTri cqriala Rvino Tskhinvali Samegrelo Mtskheta ! Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI ! Imereti Guria Shida Kartli TELAVI Kakheti BATUMI Ajara Samtskhe ! TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo ! R! ! kartli R! ! ! ! Kvemo roka ! ! Edisa ! ! Kvaisa ! ! ! Vaneli ! o !Kemulta 0 5 10 20 ! ! KM R!JAVA ! R! Tskhinvali Region Kekhvi ! ! Kurta Vakhtana ! Largvisi ! ! ! TSKHINVALI !(Eredvi !H ! Gdu Mereti ! KORNISI Avnevi R! ! Korinta ! Tkviavi Kanchaveti ! ! Mejvriskhevi Shindisi !( ! Akhalgori !Dirbi !( Ali !Abisi Bershueti ! Breti ! ! Variani !( Karaleti ! ! Zeghduleti Agara ! Sakorintlo ! Kheltubani !( !( Surami Gomi Ruisi ! !( ! KARELI ! Kvemo Chala! R! Lamiskana ! !( !( KHASHURI Zemo Samtavisi Kvishkheti R! Khvedureti GORI Tezi !( ! !H !( !( Zghuderi Khidistavi Okami ! Kvakhvreli !( !( ! ! ! Gverdzineti Ateni !( Doesi KASPI ! Shida Kartli ! Metekhi R! !( ma ! Dza ** Kvemo Khovle Tana ! !( !( Boshuri Akhalkalaki Tkemlovana ! Kavtiskhevi ! ! ATENI PROTECTED DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN ! ! ! MAJOR GRAP! ES OF SHIDA KARTLI yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi ! White: Chinuri, Goruli Mtsvane, Budeshuri Tetri TeTri: Cinuri, goruli mwvane, budeSuri TeTri Red: Tavkveri wiTeli: Tavkveri White: Chinuri, Goruli Mtsvane, Rkatsiteli TeTri: Cinuri, goruli mwvane, rqawiTeli Red: Tavkveri, Shavkapito wiTeli: Tavkveri, Savkapito sxva jiSebi White: Jvari, Gorula, Melikuda, Kishura, Shaba TeTri: jvari, gorula, melikuda, qiSuri, Saba Red: Buza, Danakharuli, Chrogha Kartlis, Ghrubela Kartlis, Kharistvala Kartlis wiTeli: buza, danaxaruli, WroRa qarTlis, Rrubela qarTlis, xarisTvala qarTlis Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]