DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Things That Concordances Do Not Tell You

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Things That Concordances Do Not Tell You 358 The Testimony, September 2001 “walk away” is indicative of the hold which John Paul II and the Palestinian leader Yasser the Middle East has on the nations of the world. Arafat. As events continue to develop in the Mid- The article goes on to write of how the European dle East we should exhort one another as we see Union has been involved and how (in MacAskill’s the day approaching (Heb. 10:25). Let us remain opinion) there is scope for more involvement in faithful so that we might be with Christ as he the crisis. The Catholic Church is also increas- marches through Bozrah (Isa. 34:6) and moves to ingly becoming involved in the crisis. On 2 Au- Israel to carry out the “recompences for the con- gust 2001 a meeting took place between Pope troversy of Zion” (v. 8). 1234 1234 1234 EDITOR: John Nicholls, 17 Upper Trinity Road, Halstead, 1234 1234 1234 Essex, CO9 1EE. Tel. 01787 473089; 1234 1234 e-mail: [email protected] 1234 1234 Reviews 1234 1234 Some things that concordances do not tell you John Carder N ENGLISH the tense of a verb shows its That form is often referred to as the stem or root relation to time, that is, past tense, present of the verb. Itense or future tense. English is a very time- From that basic and most simple form, usu- orientated language, with distinct tenses. The ally consisting of just three Hebrew letters, all Hebrew of the Bible is completely different. It other parts of each Hebrew verb are derived. has no tenses in the strict sense. Instead it has That is done by adding letters in front of the root two ‘formations’, one related to completed ac- letters (prefixes), in between them (infixes) and/ tions and the other to actions regarded as con- or behind them (suffixes), and by modifying the tinuing over time. vowels. The formation denoting completion is called In Hebrew, both Biblical and modern, nouns the avar in Hebrew or the perfect in English, are either masculine or feminine, whatever they while the other is called the atiyd in Hebrew and refer to. There is no neuter. So there are four continuous or imperfect in English. It is best to forms that Hebrew nouns may take: masculine use those terms, and not to use the term ‘tenses’ singular or plural, or feminine singular or plu- at all. Both formations can refer to past, present ral. Hebrew verbs have similar but more com- or future actions or states, a feature which Eng- plex features, but their form is such that there is lish-speakers find hard to visualise. There are no mistaking whether masculine or feminine, subtle clues as to which is meant. singular or plural is meant. Centuries after the Bible was completed, Thus the first verb in Genesis 1, ‘created’, is changes were made in Hebrew grammar to de- clearly masculine singular. The first verb in Gen- note past, present and future more distinctly. esis 1:2, “And the earth was without form”, is Modern Hebrew grammar is in this respect more clearly feminine singular—in Hebrew the earth in line with English and other European lan- is grammatically feminine. guages. Now, with the above in mind, we will look at The basic form of Hebrew verbs is the third the most frequently used reference books about person singular masculine in the avar (perfect), Biblical Hebrew. as in the form ‘[he] said’. That is the form under which Hebrew verbs are listed in most concord- Gesenius ances and dictionaries. It is a point which those Wilhelm Gesenius, 1786-1842, was Professor of sources assume you know without being told. Oriental Languages at the University of Halle, The Testimony, September 2001 359 Germany. The volumes we usually speak of as book to consult. It now appears in a smaller ‘Gesenius’ derive from his Lexicon Manuale, writ- format and includes Strong’s numbering system. ten in Latin and published in 1833. Gesenius also Most of the abbreviations are references to wrote other related works, both in German and scholarly works, and only about a dozen, mostly in Latin, which was still from medieval times the symbols, are needed by the general reader. The scholarly language of Europe. Oxford does not refer to ‘preterite’ or ‘future’, Obviously Gesenius was not the first Euro- but uses ‘Pf.’ for perfect formation and ‘Impf.’ pean to study Hebrew, but he belonged to the for imperfect (continuous) formation. It gives a German group of scholars who pioneered ‘scien- great many references, the complete range of all tific’ and ‘rationalist’ methods of analysis of He- except the most common words, and examples brew as a language and the Hebrew Scriptures. of meanings. Although it has its own biases, it is His works provide a basis, almost a quarry, for on the whole more reliable than the Tregelles other well-known reference works. Several trans- version, though Tregelles is useful as a simpler, lations into English of Gesenius’ works were pro- quick-reference work, especially as it has a brief duced quite promptly in America, notably one English index at the back. by Dr. Edward Robinson in 1836. Copies were scarce in England, and a rival version in English Strong’s Comprehensive Concordance was published ‘for students’ (unspecified) by Dr. Strong’s is, of course, most useful for its num- Samuel Prideaux Tregelles. bering system for those who cannot read He- brew or Greek. The attached Hebrew dictionary, Tregelles dated 1890 (American copyright), is clearly based Tregelles’ English edition of Gesenius first ap- on the Tregelles version of Gesenius (see also the peared in 1846, with a last edition in 1859. (It is comments on ‘The New Englishman’s’, follow- now published in America.) In his preface, ing). Tregelles admits that he has used Gesenius’s Strong’s ignores the interior pointing that in- work as a vehicle for his own views. He wanted dicates whether the Hebrew letter bet is pro- particularly to counter what he termed the “neo- nounced ‘b’ or ‘v’. The general pronunciation logian tendencies” of Gesenius, that is, his inter- guide in English is grotesque; it is liberally pep- pretations, which Tregelles regarded as not pered with misleading and totally unnecessary supporting the inspiration of Scripture. Tregelles letters ‘w’. If the reader erases, physically or tells his readers that he has included various mentally, all the ‘w’s it would be a great im- remarks to alert them to these “neologisms”, but provement. Strong’s also has too many letters ‘h’ he also introduces his own interpretations of in its pronunciation guides, but to that there is some words without warning his readers that he no simple solution. Hebrew is difficult enough is doing so. for those who know only English, and it is a pity Tregelles’ book has no list of abbreviations that the guides make it appear even more diffi- used. A frequent entry in the text is the abbre- cult. That is quite apart from the genuine diffi- viation ‘fut.’, which presumably means ‘future’ culty that Hebrew has some letters with sounds (tense). Another is ‘pret.’ or preterite (simple past which cannot be represented by single, standard tense), which is a term derived from Latin gram- English letters. mar and so is not very helpful to students of Hebrew. As we showed above, neither ‘future The New Englishman’s Concordance tense’ nor ‘preterite’ apply to the Hebrew of the The New Englishman’s is clearly based on the Bible. Tregelles version of Gesenius; indeed, its first draft was thoroughly revised by Tregelles him- The ‘Oxford Gesenius’ self. Its preface advises those who cannot read The Oxford University scholars Brown, Driver Hebrew to use it in conjunction with Strong’s, and Briggs published another English edition of and it uses Strong’s numbering system. In many Gesenius, much expanded, first in 1907, and with ways it is superior to Strong’s and Tregelles, and various reprints with corrections appearing up its present layout is much more clear. to fifty years later. It goes to the opposite ex- Unlike Strong’s it does distinguish the ‘b’ and treme to Tregelles; it has six-and-a-half closely ‘v’ forms of the Hebrew bet, as the first few pages printed pages listing abbreviations used. Those clearly show. The English pronunciation guide abbreviations make it a difficult and irritating is much better than Strong’s, eliminating the 360 The Testimony, September 2001 redundant letters ‘w’, but it still has too many 2 Kgs. 11:1. and destroyed all the seed royal letters ‘h’. In this connection there is a curious . but very minor point: the design on the title 2 Kgs. 19:18. therefore they have destroyed page shows the Hebrew alphabet in the now them. rarely-seen Ashkenazi (German or East Euro- (future?) pean) script, in which the simple ‘h’ is barely And so the process can be continued. But distinguishable from the guttural ‘h’ (chet). surely enough examples have been given to raise The very clear layout also makes clear the the question, Have the King James translators faults in the Tregelles system in a way which can been so horribly wrong throughout the Old Tes- be seen and checked by readers with little or no tament, or is it the headings that are wrong? knowledge of Hebrew. For instance, examine the The answer is: the headings ‘kal’, ‘pi’el’ and so first verb, the entry number 6 on page 8, mean- on (and terms such as ‘infinitive’, ‘imperative’ ing ‘perish’. (Englishman’s does not always and ‘participle’, which we have not dealt with specify which entries are verbs and which are here) are correct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miscellaneous Biblical Studies
    MISCELLANEOUS BIBLICAL STUDIES Thomas F. McDaniel, Ph.D. © 2010 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS iv I. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON GENDER AND SEXUALITY IN BIBLICAL TRADITION 1 II. WHY THE NAME OF GOD WAS INEFFABLE 72 III. ELIMINATING ‘THE ENEMIES OF THE LORD’ IN II SAMUEL 12:14 84 IV. RECONSIDERING THE ARABIC COGNATES WHICH CLARIFY PSALM 40:7 89 V. A NEW INTERPRETATION OF PROV 25:21–22 AND ROM 12:17–21 99 VI. ARABIC COGNATES HELP TO CLARIFY JEREMIAH 2:34b 107 VII. NOTES ON MATTHEW 6:34 “SUFFICIENT UNTO THE DAY IS THE EVIL THEREOF” 116 VIII. WHAT DID JESUS WRITE ACCORDING TO JOHN 8:6b–8? 127 IX. NOTES ON JOHN 19:39, 20:15 AND MATT 3:7 138 X. RECOVERING JESUS’ WORDS BY WHICH HE INITIATED THE EUCHARIST 151 XI. UNDERSTANDING SARAH’S LAUGHTER AND LYING: GENESIS 18:9–18 167 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS XII. REDEFINING THE eivkh/, r`aka,, AND mwre, IN MATTHEW 5:22 182 XIII. LUKE’S MISINTERPRETATION OF THE HEBREW QUOTATION IN ACTS 26:14 205 XIV. THE ORIGIN OF JESUS ’ “MESSIANIC SECRET” 219 XV. LOST LEXEMES CLARIFY MARK 1:41 AND JOHN 3:3–4 245 XVI. LOST LEXEMES CLARIFY JOHN 11:33 AND 11:38 256 XVII. A NEW INTERPRETATION OF JESUS’ CURSING THE FIG TREE 267 XVIII A NEW INTERPRETATION OF JESUS’ PARABLE OF THE WEDDING BANQUET 287 XIX RESTORING THE ORIGINAL VERSIFICATION OF ISAIAH 8 305 XX A BETTER INTERPRETATION OF ISAIAH 9:5–6a 315 XXI THE SEPTUAGINT HAS THE CORRECT TRANSLATION OF EXODUS 21:22–23 321 iii XXII RECOVERING THE WORDPLAY IN ZECHARIAH 2:4–9 [MT 2:8–13] 337 BIBLIOGRAPHY 348 iv ABBREVIATIONS A-text Codex Alexandrinus AB Anchor Bible, New York ABD The Anchor Bible Dictionary AJSL American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literature, Chicago AnBib Analecta Biblica, Rome AOS American Oriental Society, New Haven ATD Das Alte Testament Deutsch, Göttingen AV Authorized Version of the Bible, 1611 (same as KJV, 1611) B-text Codex Vaticanus BASOR Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Philadelphia BCTP A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching BDB F.
    [Show full text]
  • UTS: Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838
    The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York Union Theological Seminary Archives 1 Finding Aid for Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838 Edward Robinson Faculty Photograph, UTS2: Union Theological Seminary Records, Series 18C, box 5, folder R-S, the Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York Finding Aid prepared by: Rebecca Nieto, August 2016 With financial support from the Henry Luce Foundation and the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Foundation Summary Information Creator: Edward Robinson, 1794 – 1863 Title: Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838 Inclusive dates: 1836-1838 with some undated material Bulk dates: 1838 Abstract: Presbyterian minister, Biblical historian, translator, geographer, UTS professor and faculty librarian. Papers consist of divided bound manuscript materials recounting travels in Palestine and environs circa 1838; journals and itineraries; language workbooks; Heinrich Kiepert memoir and annotated galleys of Friedrich Wilhelm Gesenius’ Hebrew lexicon [undated]. Materials include text in English, German, Arabic, Greek, Latin, and Hebrew. Size: 7 boxes, 2.75 linear feet Storage: Onsite storage Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] UTS 1: Edward Robinson Papers, 1838 2 Administrative Information Provenance: The Edward Robinson Papers are part of the Union Theological Seminary Archives, which comprises institutional and administrative records of the Seminary, combined with the papers of many organizations, scholars, pastors, laypersons, and others connected with the school. These papers were partially processed in 2014, and completed as part of a large group of unprocessed material that was organized in 2016 during an archival processing grant funded by the Henry Luce Foundation and the E.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflectional and Derivational Hebrew Morphology According to the Theory of Phonology As Human Behavior
    BEN- GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV FACULTY OF HUMINITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LITERATURES AND LINGUISTICS INFLECTIONAL AND DERIVATIONAL HEBREW MORPHOLOGY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF PHONOLOGY AS HUMAN BEHAVIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS LINA PERELSHTEIN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: PROFESSOR YISHAI TOBIN FEBRUARY 2008 BEN- GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LITERATURES AND LINGUISTICS INFLECTIONAL AND DERIVATIONAL HEBREW MORPHOLOGY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF PHONOLOGY AS HUMAN BEHAVIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS LINA PERELSHTEIN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF PROFESSOR YISHAI TOBIN Signature of student: ________________ Date: _________ Signature of supervisor: _____________ Date: _________ Signature of chairperson of the committee for graduate studies: ______________ Date: _________ FEBRUARY 2008 ABSTRACT This research deals with the phonological distribution of Hebrew Inflectional and Derivational morphology, synchronically and diachronically. The scope of this study is suffixes, due to the fact that final position bears grammatical information, while initial position bears lexical items. In order to analyze the gathered data, the theory of Phonology as Human Behavior will be employed. The theory classifies language as a system of signs which is used by human beings to communicate; it is based on the synergetic principle of maximum communication with minimal effort. This research shows that the similarity within Modern Hebrew inflectional and derivational suffix system is greater than the derivational Modern Hebrew – Biblical Hebrew system in terms of a specialized suffix system and that the phonological distribution of Hebrew suffixes is motivated by the principles of the theory.
    [Show full text]
  • How Was the Dageš in Biblical Hebrew Pronounced and Why Is It There? Geoffrey Khan
    1 pronounced and why is it בָּתִּ ים How was the dageš in Biblical Hebrew there? Geoffrey Khan houses’ is generally presented as an enigma in‘ בָּתִּ ים The dageš in the Biblical Hebrew plural form descriptions of the language. A wide variety of opinions about it have been expressed in Biblical Hebrew textbooks, reference grammars and the scholarly literature, but many of these are speculative without any direct or comparative evidence. One of the aims of this article is to examine the evidence for the way the dageš was pronounced in this word in sources that give us direct access to the Tiberian Masoretic reading tradition. A second aim is to propose a reason why the word has a dageš on the basis of comparative evidence within Biblical Hebrew reading traditions and other Semitic languages. בָּתִּיםבָּתִּ ים The Pronunciation of the Dageš in .1.0 The Tiberian vocalization signs and accents were created by the Masoretes of Tiberias in the early Islamic period to record an oral tradition of reading. There is evidence that this reading tradition had its roots in the Second Temple period, although some features of it appear to have developed at later periods. 1 The Tiberian reading was regarded in the Middle Ages as the most prestigious and authoritative tradition. On account of the authoritative status of the reading, great efforts were made by the Tiberian Masoretes to fix the tradition in a standardized form. There remained, nevertheless, some degree of variation in reading and sign notation in the Tiberian Masoretic school. By the end of the Masoretic period in the 10 th century C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Studies in the Judaean Desert Isaiah Scrolls and Fragments
    INCORPORATING SYNTAX INTO THEORIES OF TEXTUAL TRANSMISSION: PRELIMINARY STUDIES IN THE JUDAEAN DESERT ISAIAH SCROLLS AND FRAGMENTS by JAMES M. TUCKER A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Master of Arts in Biblical Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard ............................................................................... Dr. Martin G. Abegg Jr., Ph.D.; Thesis Supervisor ................................................................................ Dr. Dirk Büchner, Ph.D.; Second Reader TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY Date (August, 2014) © James M. Tucker TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Sigla i Abstract iv Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.0. Introduction: A Statement of the Problem 1 1.1. The Goal and Scope of the Thesis 5 Chapter 2: Methodological Issues in the Transmission Theories of the Hebrew Bible: The Need for Historical Linguistics 7 2.0. The Use of the Dead Sea Scrolls Evidence for Understanding The History of ! 7 2.1. A Survey and Assessment of Transmission Theories 8 2.1.1. Frank Moore Cross and the Local Text Theory 10 2.1.1.1. The Central Premises of the Local Text Theory 11 2.1.1.2. Assessment of the Local Text Theory 14 2.1.2. Shemaryahu Talmon and The Multiple Text Theory 16 2.1.2.1. The Central Premises of the Multiple Texts Theory 17 2.1.2.2. Assessment of Multiple Text Theory 20 2.1.3. Emanuel Tov and The Non-Aligned Theory 22 2.1.3.1 The Central Premises of the Non-Aligned Theory 22 2.1.3.2. Assessment of the Non-Aligned Theory 24 2.1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • HEADS HEBREW Graml\Iar
    HEADS OF HEBREW GRAMl\iAR HE1tDS OF IIEilRE\V GRAJ\ilJ\lAR CONTAINING ALL THE PRINCIPLES NEEDED BY A LEARNER. BY S. PRIDEAUX TREGELLES, LL.D. TWENTY-THIRD IMPRESSION SAMUEL BAGSTER & SONS LTD. 80 WIGMORE STREET LONDON WI NEW YORK: HARPER AND BROTHERS ..?'RINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN PREFACE. - THE object of these Heads of Hebrew Grammar is to furnish the learner of that language with all that is noedful for him in his introductory studies, so that he may be thoroughly grounded in all that is elementary. In teaching, the present writer has been wont to give oral imtruction as to all the elements, commonly making use of some short Hebrew grammar ;--marking tl,e rules which re­ quire attent10n, and adding others which are not to be found in elementary grammars in general. In this way he has had a kind of oral Hebrew grammar for learners; and the same grammatical instruction which he has thus communicated to those whom he has thus taught, is here given w-ritten down for use or reference. He is well aware that the number of Hebrew grammars,­ both of those called elementary, and of those called critical, -is very great; this consideration made him long feel reluc­ tant to commit his oral grammatical instruction to writing; but, if the mass of He\Jrew grammars be examined, it will be found that very few of them possess any distinctive features; and he is not aware of one which he has been able to use as thoroughly adapted to the want,s of learners.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Assignment in Words with -I Suffix in Hebrew Ora (Rodrigue) Schwarzwald, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
    Stress Assignment in Words with -i Suffix in Hebrew Ora (Rodrigue) Schwarzwald, Bar-Ilan University, Israel The purpose of this paper is to describe, analyze and explain the stress patterns of words formed with the homonymic suffix -i which conveys a variety of derivational and inflectional morphological functions in Hebrew, e.g. yaldut-i ‘childish’ (derivation) and ‘my childhood’ (inflection). The suffix -i functions in two inflectional and three derivational categories: (a) second person singular feminine in verbs (e.g. šví ‘sit down! [F.SG]’, takúmi ‘you[F.SG] will get up’); (b) first person singular in nouns, prepositions, and several other parts of speech (e.g. 'aví ‘my father’, kamóni ‘like me’); (c) adjectival formation (e.g. 'olamí ‘worldwide’, cíni ‘cynical’); (d) gentilic affiliation (e.g. germaní ‘German’, síni ‘Chinese’); (e) affectionate expression (e.g. xamúdi ‘sweetie’). Polysemy seems to occur in adjectives (c) and gentilic words (d), however, as each of the functions creates different word classes – only adjectives in (c) and both nouns and adjectives in (d), these categories will be differentiated here. The stress in words with the suffix -i is not fixed, as can be seen in the examples above. In most cases the suffix is stressed (except for (e) which is always unstressed). Penultimate stress is determined in each category by various phonological and morphological rules as well as by other non-linguistic factors which will be described and explained in this paper. Keywords: derivation, homonymy, inflection, stress, suffixes, word class 1. Introduction Affixes are morphological devices in word formation and in inflection. They are affixed to certain stems in order to indicate features such as person, number, gender, or tense in inflection, and to create substantives from verbal stems, adjectives from nouns and other words in derivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chastised Rulers in the Ancient Near East
    Chastised Rulers in the Ancient Near East Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By J. H. Price, M.A., B.A. Graduate Program in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Samuel A. Meier, Advisor Daniel Frank Carolina López-Ruiz Bill T. Arnold Copyright by J. H. Price 2015 Abstract In the ancient world, kings were a common subject of literary activity, as they played significant social, economic, and religious roles in the ancient Near East. Unsurprisingly, the praiseworthy deeds of kings were often memorialized in ancient literature. However, in some texts kings were remembered for criminal acts that brought punishment from the god(s). From these documents, which date from the second to the first millennium BCE, we learn that royal acts of sacrilege were believed to have altered the fate of the offending king, his people, or his nation. These chastised rulers are the subject of this this dissertation. In the pages that follow, the violations committed by these rulers are collected, explained, and compared, as are the divine punishments that resulted from royal sacrilege. Though attestations are concentrated in the Hebrew Bible and Mesopotamian literature, the very fact that the chastised ruler type also surfaces in Ugaritic, Hittite, and Northwest Semitic texts suggests that the concept was an integral part of ancient near eastern kingship ideologies. Thus, this dissertation will also explain the relationship between kings and gods and the unifying aspect of kingship that gave rise to the chastised ruler concept across the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew-Greek Dictionaries the Abridged Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English Lexicon of the Old Testament Whitaker, Richard, Francis Brown, S.R
    Hebrew-Greek Dictionaries The Abridged Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English Lexicon of the Old Testament Whitaker, Richard, Francis Brown, S.R. (Samuel Rolles) Driver and Charles A. (Charles Augustus) Briggs. The Abridged Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English Lexicon of the Old Testament : From A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament by Francis Brown, S.R. Driver and Charles Briggs, Based on the Lexicon of Wilhelm Gesenius. Oak Harbor WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997. Analytical Lexicon of the Greek New Testament Friberg, Timothy, Barbara Friberg and Neva F. Miller. Vol. 4, Analytical Lexicon of the Greek New Testament. Baker's Greek New Testament library. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 2000. Analytical Lexicon of the Syriac New Testament : Based on the SEDRA 3 Database of George Anton Kiraz Kiraz, George A. Analytical Lexicon of the Syriac New Testament : Based on the SEDRA 3 Database of George Anton Kiraz. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2003. The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary Freedman, David Noel. The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary. New York: Doubleday, 1996. Building Your Biblical Hebrew Vocabulary Landes, George M. Vol. 41, Building Your Biblical Hebrew Vocabulary : Learning Words by Frequency and Cognate. Resources for biblical study. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2001. Building Your New Testament Greek Vocabulary 3rd Edition Van Voorst, Robert E. Building Your New Testament Greek Vocabulary. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1990. Collins Latin Dictionary and Grammar Collins Latin Dictionary Plus Grammar. Glasgow: HarperCollins, 1997. The Complete Word Study Dictionary, New Testament Zodhiates, Spiros. The Complete Word Study Dictionary : New Testament. electronic ed. Chattanooga, TN: AMG Publishers, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Development of Some Pronominal Suffixes in Hebrew
    REMARKS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOME PRONOMINAL SUFFIXES IN HEBREW by JOSHUA BLAU Hebrew University, Jerusalem ABSTRACT: The paradigmatic pressure for the preservation of the final vowels of pronominal suffixes after long vowels, where gender opposition could not be marked by the preceding vowel, was strong enough to create in rabbinic Hebrew, in Aramaic, and in Arabic, dialect doublets, viz., suffixes without final vowel after originally short vowels (as rabbinic He­ brew yadak 'your hand'), and those with final vowels after long vowels (as yadeKa 'your hands'). 1. In Hebrew Annual Review, R. C. Steiner ( 1979), among a plethora of stimulating observations, dealt with the 2ms and 3fs pronominal suffixes in biblical and rabbinic Hebrew. In the following, I would like to consider these features from somewhat different angles. 2. As to the 2ms pronominal suffix, in biblical Hebrew in context it invariably terminates in -ka, e.g. yad;Jka 'your hand', in pause either in -ak, e.g. lak 'to you', or, as a rule, in -eka, e.g. yadeka. In rabbinic Hebrew, on the other hand, its usual form is -ak, e.g. yadak, after bases ending in a vowel -ka, e.g. yadeka 'your hands' (for particulars, see Steiner 1979, p. 158). The prevalence of the -ak type in rabbinic Hebrew reflects an Aramaism, according to Ben-Hayyim (1954, pp. 63f); Steiner (p. 162) mentions as an additional factor the tendency of biblical Hebrew pausal forms to spread into nonpausal positions in rabbinic Hebrew. Both expla­ nations, however, cannot be considered decisive, Ben-Hayyim's view, be­ cause the distribution of-akin rabbinic Hebrew differs significantly from that in Aramaic (as pointed out by Steiner, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Metalinguistic and Spelling Development Across Languages : Evidence from English and Hebrew
    RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN METALINGUISTIC AND SPELLING DEVELOPMENT ACROSS LANGUAGES: EVIDENCE FROM ENGLISH AND HEBREW Miriam Ruth Bindman Child Development and Learning Institute of Education University of London Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 1997 2 ABSTRACT Metalinguistic awareness is transferable between oral and written forms of language, and between different languages. Recent research has established a connection between monolingual children's grammatical awareness and their morphological spelling knowledge. Studies of bilingual children have shown that phonological awareness and alphabetic knowledge transfer across languages, even if the languages are dissimilar and are written with different scripts. This study investigates transfer of grammatical awareness and morphological spelling knowledge across dissimilar languages and scripts. In spoken language, children learn not only surface-level language 'facts' specific to that language (e.g. vocabulary) but also deeper-level grammatical principles (e.g. morphological and syntactic relationships), which govern other languages. Similarly, literacy requires surface-level knowledge of a specific script (e.g. letters and their sound values), and knowledge of the principle underlying that script (e.g. that alphabets represent phonology and morphology), which governs other scripts of the same type. I propose that transfer across languages occurs at the level of grammatical awareness but not at the level of vocabulary. The hypothesis was tested in English- speaking children (6-11 years) learning Hebrew as a second language. In Study 1, Hebrew learners were given oral measures of vocabulary and grammatical awareness, and measures of morphological spelling knowledge. Grammatical awareness and morphological spelling knowledge were significantly correlated across languages, but vocabulary was not.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucia HOREA School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia Norwich, England [email protected]
    Lucia HOREA School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia Norwich, England [email protected] HEBREW LINGUISTICS: BETWEEN THE SPIRITUAL AND THE SOCIOCULTURAL Abstract: In the Hebrew language, notions such as the issue of temporality and a well- established sociocultural view have been conceptualised and internalised in a distinctive manner, making full use of the language‘s particularities. A cultural frame of reference with regards to Hebrew has not been the main focus of the linguistic community in several decades, with most recent studies typically centring instead on a psychological or morphological viewpoint, if not on the traditional topic of Biblical Hebrew itself. Consequently, this approach to Hebrew‘s linguistic individuality will address existing research in the field of cultural linguistics, as well as the expansive repositories of Rabbinic wisdom (the exegetical commentaries of the Talmud and the Jewish esoteric theosophy of the Kabbalah and Gematria). The approach to the Jewish occult is made necessary by its direct connection with the spiritual, which provided this language‘s cryogenic state of existence for nearly two millennia of Jewish diaspora. Keywords: Hebrew, cultural linguistics, Jewish sociocultural view, Kabbalah, Talmud This paper will aim to outline certain aspects of the existing research and published works on Hebrew linguistics, specifically the cultural and spiritual aspects. The current state of this research reveals a rather restricted amount of attention which is paid to this particular field of study, the sociocultural, with more focus placed on either the history and development of this language and Biblical Hebrew, or on Modern Hebrew from the perspective of psycholinguistics.
    [Show full text]