DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability of Harvest of Culpeo Foxes in Patagonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability of Harvest of Culpeo Foxes in Patagonia ORYX VOL 29 NO 1 JANUARY 1995 Sustainability of harvest of culpeo foxes in Patagonia Andres J. Novaro Wildlife hunting, for meat and skins, is an important component of the rural economy in Argentinian Patagonia. Every year thousands of fur-bearing mammals are killed and the impact of this on their populations is unknown. This paper reports on the results of a preliminary investigation into the sustainability of the harvest of culpeo foxes Dusicyon culpaeus in a 1000-sq-km area of Neuquen Province. Monitoring of fox densities and harvest rates over 5 years on six ranches revealed that, despite intense hunting, the numbers of foxes remained little changed. On the other hand, life-table analysis suggested that the levels of hunting pressure on four ranches were too high to allow fox populations to persist unless they were boosted by immigration. The findings have applications for wildlife managers in establishing sustainable harvest rates and optimal spatial distribution of those rates. Hunting for fur-bearing mammals is wide- has not been well studied and government spread throughout Argentinian Patagonia. agencies and the general public consider Every winter thousands of culpeo foxes sheep and cattle ranching to be the only signif- Dusicyon culpaeus and Patagonian grey foxes icant economic activities in the region. D. griseus, hog-nosed skunks Conepatus chinga Between 1975 and 1985, an average of and C. humboldtii, and Geoffroy's and Pampas 460,000 skins of 'grey' fox (a description that cats, Felis geoffroyi and F. colocolo, are captured includes the Patagonian grey fox and the with leg-hold traps, shot or hunted with dogs. Pampas fox D. gymnocercus) were exported Culpeo fox hunting, in particular, is di- from Argentina (Garcia Fernandez, 1991). rected towards reducing sheep predation These exports reached a peak in 1979, when (Bellati and von Thungen, 1990) and is also an over 1.2 million skins of those two species important source of income for rural people. were exported. Exports have declined since On sheep farms in southern Neuquen 1979. The export of culpeo fox skins followed Province, north-west Patagonia, many ranch a similar trend, but with smaller numbers workers each hunt between 10 and 25 foxes a (Figure 1). It is not clear if these declines in year (Novaro and Funes, unpubl. data). For legal exports were the result of decreasing these people, with salaries of $US120-300 a population sizes, increasing domestic use of month, and culpeo fox skins worth an average fox furs (which is significant in the case of the of $US15 each, culpeo fox hunting alone repre- culpeo), or increases in illegal exports (Garcia sents 4-26 per cent of their annual income. In Fernandez, 1991; Novaro, 1993). addition, these people also hunt introduced On a regional scale, the numbers of foxes European hares Lepus capensis for cash, and hunted are equally impressive and variable guanacos Lama guanicoe, rheas Pterocnemia pen- from year to year, although data available are nata, armadillos Chaetophractus villosus and much more limited. In southern Rio Negro Zaedyus pichiy, and introduced red deer Cervus Province, northern Patagonia, 791-21,000 elaphus for meat. Thus, wildlife hunting is an foxes (grey and culpeo) were hunted during important component of rural economies in the six years from 1988 to 1993 (Figure 2) Patagonia, although its relative importance (Subsecretaria de Fauna, 1988, 1989, 1990, 18 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.19, on 03 Oct 2021 at 22:02:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300020822 SUSTAINABILITY OF HARVEST OF CULPEO FOXES IN PATAGONIA 10 r 25 20 i5 6- 10 I988 I989 I990 I99I I992 I993 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Figure 2. Harvest of Patagonian grey fox Dusicyon culpaeus and culpeo fox D. culpaeus in Rio Negro Figure 1. Exports of culpeo foxes Dusicyon culpaeus province between 1988 and 1993 (from Subsecretaria from Argentina between 1976 and 1990) from Garcia de Fauna, 1988,1989,1990,1991, and M. Alcalde, Fernandez, 1991). pers. comm.) • , culpeo fox; H, Patagonian grey fox 1991, and M. Alcalde, pers. comm.). (Caughley, 1977) and ran simulations with the The impact of this harvest on populations of computer programme RAMAS/age (Anon., fur-bearers as well as on all other species 1990; Novaro, 1991). The trend in culpeo hunted is unknown. In 1989 I initiated a study abundance was simulated in 30 replicates run of population trends and the impact of hunt- for 50 years. ing on culpeo and grey foxes in southern Between 1989 and 1993 I monitored culpeo Neuquen Province (40°S and 71 °W). The pur- and grey fox densities using the scent-station pose of this paper is to report the results of a method (Roughton and Sweeny, 1982) on six preliminary evaluation of the sustainability of ranches (Catan Lil, Los Remolinos, La Papay, the harvest of culpeo foxes in this intensively Cerro de los Pinos, Collun-Co and La hunted area. Rinconada) with a total area of approximately 1000 sq km. Most hunting occurred on the first four ranches and there was little or no hunting Methods on the latter two. I estimated harvest rates and some population parameters through the col- An analysis of the dynamics of a harvested lection of fox carcasses from local hunters population of culpeo foxes was conducted (mainly ranch workers). Preliminary estimates using data on age structure and fecundity of culpeo densities were obtained by combin- from Crespo and De Carlo (1963). These ing scent-station with capture data (Novaro, authors worked in the same study area 30 1991) and from live captures and an on-going years earlier, collecting carcasses from local radio-telemetry study (Novaro et ah, 1993). hunters. I considered that it was appropriate These estimates of fox density were compared to use their data because hunting methods, with harvest rates to evaluate the proportion human populations and land-use systems had of the population removed annually. not changed in the area in the last 30 years. Thus, it was expected that the human impact on fox populations had changed little. Reanalysing their data, I built a life table ORYX VOL 29 NO 1 JANUARY 1995 19 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.19, on 03 Oct 2021 at 22:02:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300020822 A. J. NOVARO 160 20 250 200 120 150 80 40 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 -•- culpeo density, g culpeo hunted Figure 4. Population trend of culpeo foxes (in proportion of scent stations visited) and minimum number of foxes hunted in the study area in southern Neuquen between 1989 and 1993 (from 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 3032 Novaro and Funes, unpublished data). Years Figure 3. Simulation of culpeo abundance over time Furthermore the sex ratio in the culpeo with population characteristics derived from Crespo population has changed during the last 30 and De Carlo (1963). years in the direction expected from the re- sponse to increased hunting pressure. Crespo Results and discussion and De Carlo (1963) estimated a sex ratio sig- nificantly biased towards males (0.69 females The estimated age structure of the harvested to 1 male, n = 254), whereas the preliminary culpeo population in 1963 was 105, 55, 6 and 1 data from the same area for the present study foxes in 0, 1, 2 and 3-year-old age classes, re- showed that the sex ratio now is not signifi- spectively. The fecundity rate was 1.06 cantly different from a 1:1 ratio (0.92 females (pups/adult-year), and the survival rates for to 1 male, n = 102; Novaro, 1991). A change in age classes 0,1 and 2 were 0.52, 0.12 and 0.17, sex ratio from one biased towards males to a respectively. The preliminary simulation balanced one or biased towards females has based on these data showed that culpeo popu- been observed in other canids subject to in- lations could not maintain their numbers and tense hunting pressures, for example coyote eventually would collapse under the harvest Canis latrans (Knowlton, 1972; Berg and levels at the time (Figure 3). Chesness, 1978), and is interpreted as a mech- Because culpeo foxes are still abundant in anism that allows populations to withstand the area, I wondered if harvest rates could high mortality rates temporarily. have declined during the last three decades The population trend of culpeos in the area since the population age structure data were shows that in spite of intense hunting their collected. This was probably not the case, be- numbers remain little changed and have in- cause fur prices increased during the mid- creased slightly (Figure 4). I was not always 1970s (Ojeda and Mares, 1982), producing a able to determine the total number of foxes higher demand for fox furs, and remained hunted because of logistical problems, so only high in the region until the late 1980s (Novaro the most reliable figures were considered. The more than twice and Funes, unpubl. data). minimum number of foxes known to have 20 ORYX VOL 29 NO 1 JANUARY 1995 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.19, on 03 Oct 2021 at 22:02:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3)
    PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3) Investigation of Pallas’s cat activity patterns and temporal interactions with sympatric species Authors: Katarzyna Ruta, Gustaf Samelius, David Barclay, Emma Nygren PICA - “Conservation of the Pallas’s cat through capacity building, research, and global planning” 1. Introduction: 1.1 Activity patterns of wild felids: Activity patterns form a part of species’ adaptation to their environment (Beltran & Delibes, 1994) and are therefore a fundamental aspect of animal behaviour (Nielsen, 1983; Weller & Bennett, 2001). Felids are generally considered to be crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity (Kitchener, 1991), although they are well adapted to function in a wide range of light conditions (Sunquist & Sunquist, 2002). Numerous abiotic pressures and biotic interactions are known to shape the temporal behaviour of (cat-like) carnivores (Marinho et al., 2018), including changes in temperature (Beltran & Delibes, 1994; Podolski et al., 2013), light (Huck et al., 2017; Heurich et al., 2014) and season (Podolski et al., 2013; Manfredi et al., 2011), sex and reproductive status of the animal (Kolbe & Squires, 2007; Schmidt, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2009), predation risk (Caro, 2005; Farías et al., 2012) and human disturbance (Wolf & Ale, 2009; Ale & Brown, 2009). Owing to the dietary constraints of carnivores whose preys have their own well-defined circadian rhythms (Halle, 2000; Zielinski, 2000), the availability and vulnerability of prey is, however, considered as one of the main influences on predator temporal activity (Zielinski, 1988; Lodé, 1995). According to Optimal Foraging Theory, predators are expected to synchronize their daily activity with the activity of their most profitable prey, increasing the probability of encounters while reducing energy expenditure (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Monterroso et al., 2013; Emmons, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central Argentina
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central Argentina Nicolás Caruso1,2*, Mauro Lucherini1,2, Daniel Fortin3, Emma B. Casanave1,4 1 Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos (GECM), Cátedra de Fisiología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3 Département de biologie and Centre d'étude de la forêt, Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, 4 Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur (INBIOSUR), Universidad Nacional del Sur and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Bahía Blanca, Argentina * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The role that mammalian carnivores play in ecosystems can be deeply altered by human- driven habitat disturbance. While most carnivore species are negatively affected, the impact Citation: Caruso N, Lucherini M, Fortin D, Casanave of habitat changes is expected to depend on their ecological flexibility. We aimed to identify EB (2016) Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central key factors affecting the habitat use by four sympatric carnivore species in landscapes of Argentina. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150488. doi:10.1371/ central Argentina. Camera trapping surveys were carried out at 49 sites from 2011 to 2013. journal.pone.0150488 Each site was characterized by 12 habitat attributes, including human disturbance and frag- Editor: Nei Moreira, Federal University of Parana mentation. Four landscape gradients were created from Principal Component Analysis and – (UFPR) Campus Palotina, BRAZIL their influence on species-specific habitat use was studied using Generalized Linear Mod- Received: October 27, 2015 els.
    [Show full text]
  • 070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 28/07/21
    070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 28/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2021 (OR. en) 11099/21 ADD 1 ENV 557 WTO 188 COVER NOTE From: European Commission date of receipt: 27 July 2021 To: General Secretariat of the Council No. Cion doc.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 Subject: ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein Delegations will find attached document D074372/02 - Annex 1. Encl.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 11099/21 ADD 1 CSM/am TREE.1.A EN www.parlament.gv.at EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX D074372/02 […](2021) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein EN EN www.parlament.gv.at ‘ANNEX […] Notes on interpretation of Annexes A, B, C and D 1. Species included in Annexes A, B, C and D are referred to: (a) by the name of the species; or (b) as being all of the species included in a higher taxon or designated part thereof. 2. The abbreviation ‘spp.’ is used to denote all species of a higher taxon. 3. Other references to taxa higher than species are for the purposes of information or classification only. 4. Species printed in bold in Annex A are listed there in consistency with their protection as provided for by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 or Council Directive 92/43/EEC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Chapter 92A)
    1 S 23/2005 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 11th January 2005 at 5:00 pm. NO.S 23 ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (AMENDMENT OF FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD SCHEDULES) NOTIFICATION 2005 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 23 of the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act, the Minister for National Development hereby makes the following Notification: Citation and commencement 1. This Notification may be cited as the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Amendment of First, Second and Third Schedules) Notification 2005 and shall come into operation on 12th January 2005. Deletion and substitution of First, Second and Third Schedules 2. The First, Second and Third Schedules to the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act are deleted and the following Schedules substituted therefor: ‘‘FIRST SCHEDULE S 23/2005 Section 2 (1) SCHEDULED ANIMALS PART I SPECIES LISTED IN APPENDIX I AND II OF CITES In this Schedule, species of an order, family, sub-family or genus means all the species of that order, family, sub-family or genus. First column Second column Third column Common name for information only CHORDATA MAMMALIA MONOTREMATA 2 Tachyglossidae Zaglossus spp. New Guinea Long-nosed Spiny Anteaters DASYUROMORPHIA Dasyuridae Sminthopsis longicaudata Long-tailed Dunnart or Long-tailed Sminthopsis Sminthopsis psammophila Sandhill Dunnart or Sandhill Sminthopsis Thylacinidae Thylacinus cynocephalus Thylacine or Tasmanian Wolf PERAMELEMORPHIA
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivores in the Southwest of the Province of Buenos Aires: Ecology and Conflicts with Farmers
    ARTICLES RIA / Vol. 43 / N.º 2 Carnivores in the southwest of the province of Buenos Aires: ecology and conflicts with farmers CARUSO, N.1,2; LUENGOS VIDAL, E.M.1,3; LUCHERINI, M.1,2; GUERISOLI, M.1,2; MARTINEZ, S.1; CASANAVE, E.B.1,3 ABSTRACT The key role that wild carnivores play in ecosystems is threatened by human persecution and habitat alte- ration worldwide. The SW region of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, is a region strongly modified by the spread of agriculture and where, in the last years, there has been an increase in carnivore predation on livestock. The simultaneous study of the ecology of carnivores and of their conflicts with ranching activities is essential to find solution that can minimize the impact of these species on the regional economy while main- taining their ecological role. We deployed camera traps in the Buenos Aires counties of Villarino and Patagones to study the factors affecting the distribution of the four most common species (puma, Puma concolor; Geoffroy’s cat, Leopardus geoffroyi; Pampas fox, Pseudalopex gymnocercus; Molina’s hog-nosed skunk, Conepatus chinga). Semi-struc- tured interviews to local ranchers and participative workshops were carried out to analyze human-carnivore conflicts. From 2008 to 2015, we surveyed 49 camera trap sites and characterized the study area through 12 variables related to anthropogenic alterations and to landscape composition and fragmentation. We also com- pleted 193 interviews and four workshops. For the interviews we used a questionnaire focused on collecting information on socio-economic aspects of ranchers and ranch management, while in the workshops we sear- ched for a common agreement on the relevance of the potential factors affecting human-carnivore conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Direct Observational Method and Possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an Invitation for the Rescue of a Classical Method Spread Over the Primatology
    ZOOLOGIA 26 (4): 587–593, December, 2009 OPINION The direct observational method and possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an invitation for the rescue of a classical method spread over the Primatology Primates and carnivores belong to phylogenetically dis- the Palaeotropic and Nearctic regions, and studies using direct tant mammal orders (MURPHY et al. 2001). Overall, carnivores observation in the Neotropical region are very rare, in spite of have developed some very particular and conservative charac- the existing possibilities. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that teristics during the process of evolution, whereas primates have the behavior, socioecology, and certain other aspects of the held to a more plesiomorphic bauplan that emphasizes adapt- biology of carnivores are poorly understood. The aim of the ability over adaptation (SIMPSON 1980). Such differences in the present study is therefore to address this gap in the Neotropics. history of each group have resulted in remarkable anatomical, The advantage of primates and the problem of ecological, and behavioral differences. carnivores in the Neotropics The most commonly studied interactions between pri- It has been possible to study the ecology and behavior of mates and carnivores are between predator and prey (e.g., TREVES primates by following and observing them directly in several 1999, ZUBERBÜHLER & JENNY 2002). While some interactions are locations in South and Central America, because they are con- of a competitive nature (e.g., ROSE et al. 2003, TREVES & PALMQVIST spicuous, and also because of their daily habits and the rela- 2007), mutual interactions are rare (e.g., SCHLEIDT & SHALTER 2003, tive ease with which they become habituated to the observer HAUGAASEN & PERES 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geoffroy's Cats of El Palmar
    T H E G E O F F R O Y'S C A TS O F E L PA L M A R - A Five Day Quest for Mammals in Parque Nacional El Palmar, A rgentina Palm stand in Parque Nacional El Palmar. Steve Morgan 11/9/13 T H E G E O F FR O Y'S C A TS O F E L PA L M A R 1 Introduction I had heard about sightings of Geoffroy's Cat in Parque Nacional de El Palmar in Entre Rios province in Argentina, notably through Richard Webb's successful tour earlier in 2013 and also through looking at other sources on the Internet. This species is normally quite difficult and so hearing about these regular sightings caught my attention. I decided to make a quick "smash and grab" raid, with the intention of getting in, "doing the business" and getting out - all with the minimum necessary expenditure of time and money. As things turned out, finding the cats proved relatively easy and I managed five sightings of six cats in five days/evenings, all being (as far as I could tell) different individuals. One was a melanistic black cat, a fairly common idiosyncracy of the species. I also recorded Pampas Fox, Crab-eating Fox, Neo-tropical River Otter and Nine-banded Armadillo among a supporting cast of ten other mammals. The trip ran from 3/9/13 to 8/9/13, during which time I was very ably assisted and guided by Mario Mosqueira and Nicolas Bejarano of Clark Expeditions in Salta.
    [Show full text]
  • 990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
    Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Presence of Wild Animals
    Report of the Presence of Wild Animals The information recorded here is essential to emergency services personnel so that they may protect themselves and your neighbors, provide for the safety of your animals, ensure the maximum protection and preservation of your property, and provide you with emergency services without unnecessary delay. Every person in New York State, who owns, possesses, or harbors a wild animal, as set forth in General Municipal Law §209-cc, must file this Report annually, on or before April 1, of each year, with the clerk of the city, village or town (if outside a village) where the animal is kept. A list of the common names of animals to be reported is enclosed with this form. Failure to file as required will subject you to penalties under law. A separate Report is required to be filed annually for each address where a wild animal is harbored. Exemptions: Pet dealers, as defined in section 752-a of the General Business Law, zoological facilities and other exhibitors licensed pursuant to U.S. Code Title 7 Chapter 54 Sections 2132, 2133 and 2134, and licensed veterinarians in temporary possession of dangerous dogs, are not required to file this report. Instructions for completing this form: 1. Please print or type all information, using blue or black ink. 2. Fill in the information requested on this page. 3. On the continuation sheets, fill in the information requested for each type of animal that you possess. 4. Return the completed forms to the city, town, or village clerk of each municipality where the animal or animals are owned, possessed or harbored.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised 22/05/2009
    2009R0407 — EN — 22.05.2009 — 000.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 123, 19.5.2009, p. 3) Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 139, 5.6.2009, p. 35 (407/2009) 2009R0407 — EN — 22.05.2009 — 000.001 — 2 ▼B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the CITES Convention’. (2) The following species have been added to Appendix III to the CITES Convention at the request of China: Corallium elatius, Corallium japonicum, Corallium konjoi and Corallium secundum. (3) The species Crax daubentoni, Crax globulosa, Crax rubra, Ortalis vetula, Pauxi pauxi, Penelopina
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • AJ Detska Priloha 1 2019 Sestava 1 2.5.2019 9:19 Stránka 1
    AJ_detska priloha_1 2019_Sestava 1 2.5.2019 9:19 Stránka 1 Baby Kit Escape to the Tropics s Introductory text: Who wouldn’t want to escape to the tropics during a winter like this? If you come to Brno Zoo, you can take refuge in the warmth of the pavilions and enjoy the sight of exotic animals from different continents. Can you find which continent the following four animal groups belong to? Note that all the animals featured in the crossword puzzle live in that part of the world! 2 1 2 1 3 4 5 10 The answer 6 6 is in the secret. 7 8 12 9 11 10 11 6. On the slopes and plateaus of the Andes live herds of herbivores. The natives have domesticated this 12 species, and breed it not only for its nourishing milk but mostly for its very soft, warm wool. 7. The three largest species of flying parrots have this generic name. Their species names are: hy- 1. The slowest mammal in the world, it spends acinth, blue-and-yellow, and red-and-green. most of its life hanging in the tree tops or in the 8. E! lianas, where it consumes leaves and sleeps. 9. The _ _ _ _ _ _ is the largest cat on the conti- 2. It can curl up and protect itself from a predator’s nent, but not in the world. Its coat is dark yellow attack using very strong plates on its back. with circular markings. It has the same name as 3.
    [Show full text]