Carnivores in the Southwest of the Province of Buenos Aires: Ecology and Conflicts with Farmers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carnivores in the Southwest of the Province of Buenos Aires: Ecology and Conflicts with Farmers ARTICLES RIA / Vol. 43 / N.º 2 Carnivores in the southwest of the province of Buenos Aires: ecology and conflicts with farmers CARUSO, N.1,2; LUENGOS VIDAL, E.M.1,3; LUCHERINI, M.1,2; GUERISOLI, M.1,2; MARTINEZ, S.1; CASANAVE, E.B.1,3 ABSTRACT The key role that wild carnivores play in ecosystems is threatened by human persecution and habitat alte- ration worldwide. The SW region of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, is a region strongly modified by the spread of agriculture and where, in the last years, there has been an increase in carnivore predation on livestock. The simultaneous study of the ecology of carnivores and of their conflicts with ranching activities is essential to find solution that can minimize the impact of these species on the regional economy while main- taining their ecological role. We deployed camera traps in the Buenos Aires counties of Villarino and Patagones to study the factors affecting the distribution of the four most common species (puma, Puma concolor; Geoffroy’s cat, Leopardus geoffroyi; Pampas fox, Pseudalopex gymnocercus; Molina’s hog-nosed skunk, Conepatus chinga). Semi-struc- tured interviews to local ranchers and participative workshops were carried out to analyze human-carnivore conflicts. From 2008 to 2015, we surveyed 49 camera trap sites and characterized the study area through 12 variables related to anthropogenic alterations and to landscape composition and fragmentation. We also com- pleted 193 interviews and four workshops. For the interviews we used a questionnaire focused on collecting information on socio-economic aspects of ranchers and ranch management, while in the workshops we sear- ched for a common agreement on the relevance of the potential factors affecting human-carnivore conflicts. The application of Generalized Linear Models to camera trapping data indicated that the use of habitat by carnivores in the region is affected by the alterations of natural habitats. The Pampas fox and skunk were the species with greater adaptability, whereas the puma and Geoffroy’s cat appeared to be more sensitive to ecosystem modifications. Pumas avoided intensively modified sites and preferred natural patches. Losses on livestock by pumas and Pampas foxes during the previous year were reported by 47% and 55% of respon- dents, respectively, and 93% of ranchers considered carnivores as detrimental to regional production. Work- shop participants identified a possible increase in conflicts associated to the decrease in human presence in ranchlands. Although illegal hunting of carnivores appears to be the most common response to conflicts, ran- chers showed interest and motivation to explore mitigation measures. The comprehension of the socio-eco- nomic dynamics occurring in the SW of Buenos Aires is extremely urgent for conflict mitigation. Nevertheless, long term solutions will require the engagement of local communities and different government institutions. Keywords: predation, patagones, villarino, livestock, puma, pampas fox. 1GECM (Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos), Cátedra. Fisiología Animal, Depto. Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Uni- versidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670, 8000 Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Correo electrónico: [email protected] 2CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3INBIOSUR-UNS-CONICET (Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur), Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Received August 4 2016 // Accepted March 7 2017 // Published online July 5 2017 Carnivores in the southwest of the province of Buenos Aires: ecology and conflicts with farmers August 2017, Argentina 5 INTRODUCTION Many times the losses due to predation call more atten- tion to the producer than inadequate sanitary, reproductive The order Carnivora includes 286 species (Wilson and or nutritional management and lead to an overestimation of Reeder, 2005), 28 of which are found in Argentina (Ojeda the importance of the conflict (Polisar et al., 2003). et al., 2012). They are mostly predators located at the top of the trophic pyramid (Redford and Eisenberg, 1992) and The southwest region accounts for 25% of the territory which feed mainly on vertebrates (Emmons, 1987). of the province of Buenos Aires and is characterized as a mixed production area, in which livestock has an important These species have a fundamental role in the ecosystems role. Fundamentally, the action of man in this region has where they live due to the top-down control they can exert been focused on the clearing and transformation of natural over the populations they prey (Ritchie and Johnson, 2009). forests (known as “montes”) into pastures and crops (Isla Most carnivores need large territories to survive and, the- et al., 2003). refore, extensive areas are necessary to guarantee the via- Beyond its limited natural productivity, associated to poor bility of their populations (Noss et al., 1996; Ray et al., 2005). and poorly developed soils and scarce rainfall, there is an The loss and fragmentation of habitats, and the perse- unsustainable management of livestock, which threatens the cution by men are three of the main threats to carnivores functionality of ecological processes, species diversity and (Loyola et al., 2008; Crooks et al., 2011). The aforemen- economic productivity (Distel, 2016 ). All these factors have tioned characteristics make these species very vulnerable led to a strong degradation of soils (Bouza et al., 2016). to disturbances of environments and fragmentation (Lyra- This work aims at summarizing the main results obtained Jorge et al., 2010; Crooks et al., 2011). In Argentina, the to date by the Mammalian Behavioral Ecology Group [Grupo modification of natural habitats is a common phenomenon, de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos] of the Univer- especially in the central region where most of the popu- sidad Nacional del Sur, in two fundamental aspects: (1) the lation is concentrated. This is due to the advance of the use of habitat by the four most abundant species of carnivo- agricultural-livestock frontier (Brown et al., 2006). res in this region (the skunk, Conepatus chinga; Geoffroy’s Real et al. (2003) concluded that human activities are the cat, Leopardus geoffroyi; the Pampas fox, Pseudalopex most influencing factor affecting the distribution of carnivo- gymnocercus; and the cougar, Puma concolor) describing res in Argentina. In association with these transformations, the factors that most influence this process; and (2) the cha- there is a reduction in the abundance of native prey and racterization of the level of the conflict between producers the introduction of domestic livestock that, in turn, generate and carnivorous, paying particular attention to the perception conflicts between carnivores and humans (Treves and Ka- and attitudes of producers against predators. ranth, 2003). Depredation by wild animals, such as carnivores, has MATERIALS AND METHODS always been an important problem for livestock, especia- lly in South America (Baker et al., 2008; Zarco-González Study area et al., 2012). Although there are other causes of conflict For this study we formulated the following predictions in (transmission of diseases, direct attacks on humans), the regards to the habitat use pattern: greatest problems with predators is that they feed of lives- tock, which can cause significant economic losses to rural 1. Cougars would avoid the most fragmented, with the producers (Woodroffe, 2000; Baker et al., 2008). greatest human presence areas, and would use the most preserved areas more. The most common response to this type of problem is the elimination of predators (Linnell et al., 1996; Inskip and 2. Given the great hunting pressure exerted over the Zimmermann, 2009). However, this type of solution usua- Pampas fox, a certain level of avoidance is expected lly fails to solve the problem in the long term, perpetuating in those areas with the greatest human presence. At an ecological imbalance that can exacerbate the conflict the same time, an association to relatively open envi- (Snow, 2008) and bring some species to the limits of ex- ronments is expected, in agreement with the results of tinction (Goodrich y Buskirk, 1995; Wallach et al., 2009). previous studies. Many factors can influence the decision of a predator to 3. Since Geoffroy’s cat is one of the least generalist spe- hunt livestock, including learned behavior, lack of native cies of the group, a significant response of Geoffroy’s prey, lack of adequate management practices, tolerance to cat to environmental gradients is expected. Also, a humans and often habitat characteristics (Rosas-Rosas et strong association of this species to areas with the hig- al., 2008) and all of them must be evaluated when planning hest proportion of monte is expected. effective management actions. In addition, when analyzing 4. A greater association of the Molina’s hog-nosed skunk to conflicts with fauna, social, ethical, and cultural aspects sites near the crops is expected, as they have been pro- must be considered, as they frequently affect social actors posed as favorable environments for this species. and may increase the perception of the magnitude of con- flicts with a given species (Dickman, 2010; Marchini y Mac- Based on these assumptions, this study was conducted donald, 2012). in private fields located in the districts of Villarino and Pa- CARUSO, N.1,2; LUENGOS VIDAL, E.M.1,3; LUCHERINI, M.1,2; GUERISOLI, M.1,2; MARTINEZ, S.1; CASANAVE, E.B.1,3 ARTICLES RIA / Vol. 43 / N.º 2 tagones,
Recommended publications
  • PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3)
    PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3) Investigation of Pallas’s cat activity patterns and temporal interactions with sympatric species Authors: Katarzyna Ruta, Gustaf Samelius, David Barclay, Emma Nygren PICA - “Conservation of the Pallas’s cat through capacity building, research, and global planning” 1. Introduction: 1.1 Activity patterns of wild felids: Activity patterns form a part of species’ adaptation to their environment (Beltran & Delibes, 1994) and are therefore a fundamental aspect of animal behaviour (Nielsen, 1983; Weller & Bennett, 2001). Felids are generally considered to be crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity (Kitchener, 1991), although they are well adapted to function in a wide range of light conditions (Sunquist & Sunquist, 2002). Numerous abiotic pressures and biotic interactions are known to shape the temporal behaviour of (cat-like) carnivores (Marinho et al., 2018), including changes in temperature (Beltran & Delibes, 1994; Podolski et al., 2013), light (Huck et al., 2017; Heurich et al., 2014) and season (Podolski et al., 2013; Manfredi et al., 2011), sex and reproductive status of the animal (Kolbe & Squires, 2007; Schmidt, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2009), predation risk (Caro, 2005; Farías et al., 2012) and human disturbance (Wolf & Ale, 2009; Ale & Brown, 2009). Owing to the dietary constraints of carnivores whose preys have their own well-defined circadian rhythms (Halle, 2000; Zielinski, 2000), the availability and vulnerability of prey is, however, considered as one of the main influences on predator temporal activity (Zielinski, 1988; Lodé, 1995). According to Optimal Foraging Theory, predators are expected to synchronize their daily activity with the activity of their most profitable prey, increasing the probability of encounters while reducing energy expenditure (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Monterroso et al., 2013; Emmons, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central Argentina
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central Argentina Nicolás Caruso1,2*, Mauro Lucherini1,2, Daniel Fortin3, Emma B. Casanave1,4 1 Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos (GECM), Cátedra de Fisiología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3 Département de biologie and Centre d'étude de la forêt, Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, 4 Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur (INBIOSUR), Universidad Nacional del Sur and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Bahía Blanca, Argentina * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The role that mammalian carnivores play in ecosystems can be deeply altered by human- driven habitat disturbance. While most carnivore species are negatively affected, the impact Citation: Caruso N, Lucherini M, Fortin D, Casanave of habitat changes is expected to depend on their ecological flexibility. We aimed to identify EB (2016) Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central key factors affecting the habitat use by four sympatric carnivore species in landscapes of Argentina. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150488. doi:10.1371/ central Argentina. Camera trapping surveys were carried out at 49 sites from 2011 to 2013. journal.pone.0150488 Each site was characterized by 12 habitat attributes, including human disturbance and frag- Editor: Nei Moreira, Federal University of Parana mentation. Four landscape gradients were created from Principal Component Analysis and – (UFPR) Campus Palotina, BRAZIL their influence on species-specific habitat use was studied using Generalized Linear Mod- Received: October 27, 2015 els.
    [Show full text]
  • 070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 28/07/21
    070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 28/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2021 (OR. en) 11099/21 ADD 1 ENV 557 WTO 188 COVER NOTE From: European Commission date of receipt: 27 July 2021 To: General Secretariat of the Council No. Cion doc.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 Subject: ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein Delegations will find attached document D074372/02 - Annex 1. Encl.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 11099/21 ADD 1 CSM/am TREE.1.A EN www.parlament.gv.at EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX D074372/02 […](2021) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein EN EN www.parlament.gv.at ‘ANNEX […] Notes on interpretation of Annexes A, B, C and D 1. Species included in Annexes A, B, C and D are referred to: (a) by the name of the species; or (b) as being all of the species included in a higher taxon or designated part thereof. 2. The abbreviation ‘spp.’ is used to denote all species of a higher taxon. 3. Other references to taxa higher than species are for the purposes of information or classification only. 4. Species printed in bold in Annex A are listed there in consistency with their protection as provided for by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 or Council Directive 92/43/EEC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Chapter 92A)
    1 S 23/2005 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 11th January 2005 at 5:00 pm. NO.S 23 ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (AMENDMENT OF FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD SCHEDULES) NOTIFICATION 2005 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 23 of the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act, the Minister for National Development hereby makes the following Notification: Citation and commencement 1. This Notification may be cited as the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Amendment of First, Second and Third Schedules) Notification 2005 and shall come into operation on 12th January 2005. Deletion and substitution of First, Second and Third Schedules 2. The First, Second and Third Schedules to the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act are deleted and the following Schedules substituted therefor: ‘‘FIRST SCHEDULE S 23/2005 Section 2 (1) SCHEDULED ANIMALS PART I SPECIES LISTED IN APPENDIX I AND II OF CITES In this Schedule, species of an order, family, sub-family or genus means all the species of that order, family, sub-family or genus. First column Second column Third column Common name for information only CHORDATA MAMMALIA MONOTREMATA 2 Tachyglossidae Zaglossus spp. New Guinea Long-nosed Spiny Anteaters DASYUROMORPHIA Dasyuridae Sminthopsis longicaudata Long-tailed Dunnart or Long-tailed Sminthopsis Sminthopsis psammophila Sandhill Dunnart or Sandhill Sminthopsis Thylacinidae Thylacinus cynocephalus Thylacine or Tasmanian Wolf PERAMELEMORPHIA
    [Show full text]
  • The Direct Observational Method and Possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an Invitation for the Rescue of a Classical Method Spread Over the Primatology
    ZOOLOGIA 26 (4): 587–593, December, 2009 OPINION The direct observational method and possibilities for Neotropical Carnivores: an invitation for the rescue of a classical method spread over the Primatology Primates and carnivores belong to phylogenetically dis- the Palaeotropic and Nearctic regions, and studies using direct tant mammal orders (MURPHY et al. 2001). Overall, carnivores observation in the Neotropical region are very rare, in spite of have developed some very particular and conservative charac- the existing possibilities. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that teristics during the process of evolution, whereas primates have the behavior, socioecology, and certain other aspects of the held to a more plesiomorphic bauplan that emphasizes adapt- biology of carnivores are poorly understood. The aim of the ability over adaptation (SIMPSON 1980). Such differences in the present study is therefore to address this gap in the Neotropics. history of each group have resulted in remarkable anatomical, The advantage of primates and the problem of ecological, and behavioral differences. carnivores in the Neotropics The most commonly studied interactions between pri- It has been possible to study the ecology and behavior of mates and carnivores are between predator and prey (e.g., TREVES primates by following and observing them directly in several 1999, ZUBERBÜHLER & JENNY 2002). While some interactions are locations in South and Central America, because they are con- of a competitive nature (e.g., ROSE et al. 2003, TREVES & PALMQVIST spicuous, and also because of their daily habits and the rela- 2007), mutual interactions are rare (e.g., SCHLEIDT & SHALTER 2003, tive ease with which they become habituated to the observer HAUGAASEN & PERES 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geoffroy's Cats of El Palmar
    T H E G E O F F R O Y'S C A TS O F E L PA L M A R - A Five Day Quest for Mammals in Parque Nacional El Palmar, A rgentina Palm stand in Parque Nacional El Palmar. Steve Morgan 11/9/13 T H E G E O F FR O Y'S C A TS O F E L PA L M A R 1 Introduction I had heard about sightings of Geoffroy's Cat in Parque Nacional de El Palmar in Entre Rios province in Argentina, notably through Richard Webb's successful tour earlier in 2013 and also through looking at other sources on the Internet. This species is normally quite difficult and so hearing about these regular sightings caught my attention. I decided to make a quick "smash and grab" raid, with the intention of getting in, "doing the business" and getting out - all with the minimum necessary expenditure of time and money. As things turned out, finding the cats proved relatively easy and I managed five sightings of six cats in five days/evenings, all being (as far as I could tell) different individuals. One was a melanistic black cat, a fairly common idiosyncracy of the species. I also recorded Pampas Fox, Crab-eating Fox, Neo-tropical River Otter and Nine-banded Armadillo among a supporting cast of ten other mammals. The trip ran from 3/9/13 to 8/9/13, during which time I was very ably assisted and guided by Mario Mosqueira and Nicolas Bejarano of Clark Expeditions in Salta.
    [Show full text]
  • 990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
    Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Presence of Wild Animals
    Report of the Presence of Wild Animals The information recorded here is essential to emergency services personnel so that they may protect themselves and your neighbors, provide for the safety of your animals, ensure the maximum protection and preservation of your property, and provide you with emergency services without unnecessary delay. Every person in New York State, who owns, possesses, or harbors a wild animal, as set forth in General Municipal Law §209-cc, must file this Report annually, on or before April 1, of each year, with the clerk of the city, village or town (if outside a village) where the animal is kept. A list of the common names of animals to be reported is enclosed with this form. Failure to file as required will subject you to penalties under law. A separate Report is required to be filed annually for each address where a wild animal is harbored. Exemptions: Pet dealers, as defined in section 752-a of the General Business Law, zoological facilities and other exhibitors licensed pursuant to U.S. Code Title 7 Chapter 54 Sections 2132, 2133 and 2134, and licensed veterinarians in temporary possession of dangerous dogs, are not required to file this report. Instructions for completing this form: 1. Please print or type all information, using blue or black ink. 2. Fill in the information requested on this page. 3. On the continuation sheets, fill in the information requested for each type of animal that you possess. 4. Return the completed forms to the city, town, or village clerk of each municipality where the animal or animals are owned, possessed or harbored.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised 22/05/2009
    2009R0407 — EN — 22.05.2009 — 000.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 123, 19.5.2009, p. 3) Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 139, 5.6.2009, p. 35 (407/2009) 2009R0407 — EN — 22.05.2009 — 000.001 — 2 ▼B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the CITES Convention’. (2) The following species have been added to Appendix III to the CITES Convention at the request of China: Corallium elatius, Corallium japonicum, Corallium konjoi and Corallium secundum. (3) The species Crax daubentoni, Crax globulosa, Crax rubra, Ortalis vetula, Pauxi pauxi, Penelopina
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • AJ Detska Priloha 1 2019 Sestava 1 2.5.2019 9:19 Stránka 1
    AJ_detska priloha_1 2019_Sestava 1 2.5.2019 9:19 Stránka 1 Baby Kit Escape to the Tropics s Introductory text: Who wouldn’t want to escape to the tropics during a winter like this? If you come to Brno Zoo, you can take refuge in the warmth of the pavilions and enjoy the sight of exotic animals from different continents. Can you find which continent the following four animal groups belong to? Note that all the animals featured in the crossword puzzle live in that part of the world! 2 1 2 1 3 4 5 10 The answer 6 6 is in the secret. 7 8 12 9 11 10 11 6. On the slopes and plateaus of the Andes live herds of herbivores. The natives have domesticated this 12 species, and breed it not only for its nourishing milk but mostly for its very soft, warm wool. 7. The three largest species of flying parrots have this generic name. Their species names are: hy- 1. The slowest mammal in the world, it spends acinth, blue-and-yellow, and red-and-green. most of its life hanging in the tree tops or in the 8. E! lianas, where it consumes leaves and sleeps. 9. The _ _ _ _ _ _ is the largest cat on the conti- 2. It can curl up and protect itself from a predator’s nent, but not in the world. Its coat is dark yellow attack using very strong plates on its back. with circular markings. It has the same name as 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Global ICAP Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Final Report.Pdf
    Global Integrated Collection Assessment and Planning Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Omaha, NE, US, 19 – 20 March 2016 Final Report Workshop organized by: AZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; EAZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; ZAA Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group; IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group; IUCN SSC Hyaenid Specialist Group; and the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group (CPSG). Workshop financial support provided by: Saint Louis Zoo and a private donation Photo credits (front cover, left to right): Row 1: African wild dog (Yorkshire Wildlife Park); Swift fox (M. Sovada); Darwin fox education (M. Zordan); Fennec fox research (Fitbit; R. Meibaum); Row 2: Culpeo fox (Zoologico Nacional – Parque Metropolitano de Santiago, Chile); spotted hyena (Colchester Zoo); bush dog (M. Jacob); maned wolf (Temaiken Foundation); Row 3: Dhole (B. Gupta); Mexican wolf (J. Fallon); striped hyena (T. Rehse); black‐backed jackal (Amersfoort Zoo) A contribution of the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CPSG 2018 Traylor‐Holzer, K., K.
    [Show full text]