%e9vfarian Li6rary :J\&ws{etter No. 20 (New Series) Spring, 1990

j. H. Newman, 1801-1890 The Newman Year

On February 21 , 1990, the Birmingham (England) Oratory will inaugurate the Centenary Year marking the death of John Cardinal Newman. It provides a time to reflect on the influence which Newman has had and to examine his relevance to our present concerns and questions. A survey of the popular Catholic literature in the past century has shown how the American Catholic commu­ nity has responded to Newman. In the early decades, it was Newman as poet ("The Dream of Gerontius") and as educator ("The Idea of a University") that drew attention. In the 1940s, many discovered his sermons and prayers through the collections such as Heart to Heart and Lead Kindly Light. In the 1950s, his concern for a theologically educated laity inspired the Newman Centers on college campuses. Vatican II has been called "Newman's Coun­ cil ," for many of his concerns were fundamental themes of the council: the development of doctrine, the role of Cardinal Newman: the laity, ecumenical concern for the well-being of all Churches. His writings on conscience and authority and his historical studies on past councils continue to The Faith of Mary offer guidance. Thus St. Mary is our pattern of Faith both in For Newman, always interested in the fundamental the reception and in the study of Divine Truth. doctrines of Christianity, the Virgin Mary was no after­ She does not think it enough to accept, she thought. Far from detracting from Christ and the Incarna­ dwells upon it; not enough to possess, she uses tion, the Virgin Mary-as he saw her-was the greatest it; not enough to assent, she develops it; not safeguard of the truth of the Incarnation: "Nothing is so enough to submit the Reason, she reasons upon calculated to impress on our minds that Christ is really it; not indeed reasoning first and believing partaker of our nature, and in all respects man ... as to afterwards, with Zacharias, yet first believing associate Him with the thought of Mary, by whose without reasoning, next from love and reverence, • ministration He became our Brother." In those countries reasoning after believing. And thus she symbol­ where there was no devotion to Mary, he noted, belief in izes to us, not only the faith of the unlearned, but the Incarnation had waned. Newman developed the of the doctors of the Church also, who have to patristic notion that the Virgin Mary was the new Eve investigate, and weigh, and define, as well as to cooperating with the Christ, the new Adam, in the remak­ profess the Gospel; to draw the line between ing and renewal of humanity. Mary's principal traits-faith truth and heresy; to anticipate or remedy the and the pondering of God's word-replace Eve's lack various aberrations of wrong reason; to combat of belief. pride and recklessness with their own arms, and Newman presents a new pattern of sanctity-a thus to triumph over the sophist and the innova­ complex, heroic individual who confidently endures tor (University Sennons, sermon 15, p. 313). even though little understood or accepted. In a famous sermon, "The Second Spring," he referred to the restora-

(continued next page) The Newman Year (continued) Update: International Marian Research of the Catholic Church in England as a "miracle." This res­ Institute (IMRI) and The Marian Library toration is, he said, "the coming of a second spring." But spring does not mean the winter is entirely over. The The Catholic University renewal resembles an English spring, "an uncertain, of Angers and the University anxious time of hope and fear, of joy and suffering--of of Dayton sponsored a bright promise and budding hopes, yet withal, of keen festschrift presented to blasts, of cold showers, and sudden storms." He con­ Canon Rene Laurentin to cluded, "One thing alone I know-that according to our mark his 70th birthday in need, so will be our strength." 1990. Fr. Laurentin was recognized for his lifelong commitment to theology, Marianist Authors Marian studies, and Catholic on Newman journalism. Fr. Theodore Koehler represented the Readers may be interested in knowing of the many University of Dayton at the presentation on December Marianists who have written about Newman. Tbe Mariol­ 12, 1989, at Angers. The 800-page work titled Kecharit­ ogy of Cardinal Newman (New York: Benziger, 1928) by omene: Melanges Laurentin has an introduction written Francis Friedel, S.M., is a work still cited. Sylvester P. by Cardinal Poupard and is published by Desclee of Juergens, S.M. (superior-general) wrote Newman on the Paris. Professor at the International Marian Research Psychology of Faith in the Individual (New York: Macmil­ Institute, Fr. Laurentin recently completed his one­ lan, 1928) and John A. Elbert, S.M., wrote Tbe Evolution hundredth book, L rEg lise qui vient-au de/a crise. of Newman's Conception of Faith (Philadelphia: Dolphin Press, 1933). Theodore Hoeffken, S.M., wrote john Henry Fr. Eamon R.Carroll, O.Carm., professor at IMRI, Cardinal Newman on Liberal Education (Maryhurst: received from the Catholic University of America the 1989 Matianist l>ress, 1946) and William Robert Lamm, S.M., President's Patronal Medal at the National Shrine of the Tbe Spiritual Legacy ofNewman (Milwaukee: Bruce, Immaculate Conception on December 10, 1989. The c1943). At the International Marian Research Institute, Dr. Medal is awarded each year to recognize distinguished John F. Britt, University of Dayton faculty member, service in the advancement of Marian devotion, theology, presented a licentiate thesis on "A Status Quaestionis and or a general appreciation of the place of Mary in the life Analytic Study of the Use of Apocalypse 12 by Newman of the Church. Fr. Carroll has served as president of the in A Letter to Pusey"(1978) and a doctoral dissertation, Catholic Theological Society and of the Mariological "Newman's Use of Scripture in the Texts on the Incarna­ Society of America. tion and Mary" (1983). Former cataloger of The Marian Library, Mrs. Helen Nykolyshyn began the Ukrainian Marian Collection here in 1981. To assure the continuation of this work, the Ukrainian Marian Foundation, Inc., was recently estab­ lished; its purpose is to preserve and encourage the study of the Marian traditions of all Ukrainians, Catholic and Orthodox. Retired as cataloger of The Marian Library, Mrs. Nykolyshyn continues as custodian of the collection and promoter of this ecumenical foundation which has contacts with Ukrainians throughout the world.

Several exhibits of Marian art have been on display in The Marian Library: Tatiana McKinney (Oct. 16-Nov. 30); Bro. Cletus Behlmann, S.M. (Dec. 1-Jan. 19); Beverly "Vi'8in and Child"from The Month of Mary Stoller Qan. 20-Feb. 28). (New York: Sadlier, 1853). (The Marian Library Collection)

Fr. Johann Roten's article, "The Two Halves of the the Marian Library Newsletter Moon: Marian Anthropological Dimensions in the Com­ Published twice yeatly. Sent without charge to mon Mission of Adrienne von Speyr and Hans Urs von Friends of The Mariah Library and IMRI . Address Balthasar," appeared in Communio: International Catho­ all commuhication to Thomas A. Thompson, lic Review (Fall 1989). Fr. Roten also contributed to two S.M., The Marian tibtary, University of Dayton, recent works on Balthasar, edited by Walter Kasper Dayton, OH 45469-0001 . and Karl Lehmann, soon to be translated into Italian and French. 2 Forty Years: Mariological Society of Atnerica

At the 1989 meeting at Burlingame, California, the Mariological Society of America marked its fortieth anniversary. Fr. Juniper Carol, O.F.M., founder, first president (1950-1953), and executive secretary from 1954 until 1979, continues as president emeritus. Ten of the thirty-nine founding members have maintained continu­ ous membership in the society for forty years. Associated with the society almost from its beginnings were Bishop John Wright, first episcopal moderator, and Fathers Walter Burghardt, S.J., and Eamon R. Carroll, O.Carm., past presidents; Fr. Carroll has reported on recent Marian literature at every meeting from 1967 to the present. Before Vatican Council II, many national Mariological societies were founded: Belgium (1931), France (1934), Spain (1940), Portugal (1945), Canada (1949), Mexico MSAfounding members at convention. Seated (1-r): Walter 0954), Poland and Colombia (1959). Only the French, Burghardt, Sj.; Bishop john Wright; juniper B. Carol, O.F.M. Spanish, and American societies continue to meet regu­ Standing (1-r): Fathers Albert Bourke, O.C.D.; George Shea; larly and publish their proceedings. Since 1979, the Stanley Matuszewski, M.S.; I Armand Robichaud, S.M.; Eamon R. Carroll, 0 . Carm.; joseph I Gallo; Francis Costa, S.S.S. Mariological Society of America has been based at The Marian Library of the University of Dayton, and Fr. Marian studies not exclusively associated with the past. Theodore Koehler, S.M., has been its executive secretary. "Is part of our trouble," he asked, "not precisely the On its twenty-fifth anniversary in 1974, Fr. Charles impression that to Mary and things Marian there too Neumann noted in his presidential address the general readily clings the image of a past which older persons trend of Mariology today away from analysis of Mary's regret losing, while the younger feel little attraction to privileges toward a functional study of her place in something portrayed simply as a past now apparently salvation history and in the ecumenical dialogue. Since slipping from grasp?" Fr. Neumann's second challenge 1974, postconciliar topics have continued to determine anticipated what Paul VI would tell the 1975 International the agenda of the conventions: a reexamination of Marian Mariological Congress in Rome: beauty as well as truth doctrines and their place in the hierarchy of truths, the are ways of describing the Virgin Mary. Speaking a year role of papal infallibility in the proclamation of the Marian before the pope, Fr. Neumann pointed to the via pulchri­ dogmas. Studies on Mary in Scripture continue, as well as tudinis as part of Marian studies: "The Catholic Church presentations on the Marian teaching of St. Maximilian has long tried to live up to its responsibility of proclaim­ Kolbe and Hans Urs von Balthasar. ing God's truth. We have heard His truth about Mary The proceedings of the 1986 convention, devoted to staunchly defended ... . But the God of truth is also a God chapter 8 of Lumen gentium, have been recognized as • of beauty. Is not our challenge now to make the image of the most complete treatment of that topic currently His Mother and ours so beautiful that the person alive available. The 1988 meeting studied John Paul II's encyc­ today finds himself wanting to see with his own eyes lical, Redemptoris mater. The 1989 meeting, "Maria/is who she is, and in the process feels himself being led to cultus--Fifteen Years Later," marked one of the few times her Son?" that liturgy and the Virgin Mary were joined together as a The 1990 meeting will be held on May 30 and 31 at topic of study, and inaugurated a three-year program of Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island. The theme convention themes on "Mary and the Liturgical Year" "Mary in the Liturgical Year: Advent and Christmas 0990-1991-1992). Period" will be considered from a Scriptural, liturgical, Membership in the society has shown interesting fluc­ and theological viewpoint; a conference will be given on tuations. Membership was highest during the years of the implications of Cardinal Newman's Marian teaching to Vatican Council II, 1962-65, tapered off in the 1970s, ecumenism. Information about the Providence meeting picked up in the late 1980s. Its present membership (512) can be obtained from the Executive Secretary at The is the highest in its history. Marian Library. In his 1974 presidential address, Fr. Neumann pre­ Several issues of proceedings of the annual conven­ sented to the Mariological Society two challenges. First, tions are available from The Marian Library at $12.00 a he urged the members to present an image of Mary and copy; write for an up-to-date list. 3 Books

The Miracle Accounts of Our Lady and the History of Mentalities

LES COLLECTIONS DE MIRACLES purpose, the miracle stories had the The accounts are of liturgical interest DE LA VIERGE EN GALLO ET didactic function of explaining Marian (Marian prayer, especially the "Ave IBERO-ROMAN AU Xllle SIECLE. feasts and shrines, assisting Marian Maria," the joys of Mary, names of Paule V. Beterous. Marian Library apologists and fostering Marian Mary, litanies): they reflect a sound Studies 15/16, $50 available from devotion. christology (virginal conception, The Marian library. Mary was presented as domina par incarnation), but sometimes a debat­ excellence (parallel to Christus Domi­ able concept of mediation. Popular Paule V. Beterous, professor of nus). Christians were her vassals. Ac­ piety is mirrored in the miracles. We medieval literature at the University of cordingly, she held different roles, learn about the official cult of Mary Bordeaux, exhibits a vast and pro­ which all reflected her powerful (the five principal feasts); the saints, found knowledge of the 13th-century intercession with God. Frequently, she especially those related to that cult (St. collections of Our Lady's miracles made reparation for evil, both moral John); the local and international written in Gallic and the Ibero-roman­ and psycho-physical. She commanded Marian pilgrimages; and para-liturgical esque languages in this 733-page, through signs, visions, and voices, and devotions and practices, sometimes double-issue volume, which includes brought about the conversion of the of a mixed religious and magical charts, bibliography, and indices. sinner. Mary's intervention might be character. This study is of special interest for Her study retraces the history of retributive, sanctioning just or unjust scholars of Hispanic literature and Marian miracles between the 5th and judgment, or tutelary, taking the culture and for those in medieval the 14th centuries. The earliest ac­ persecuted under her mantle. Mary studies and comparative literature. It is counts of miracles of Mary were from was the intercessor, using her dialectic precisely in comparative studies that the Latin oral tradition, and Gregory of abilities in her arguments with Christ. She was comfort and assurance in the work of Beterous will produce a Tours (538-594) seems to have been rich harvest. She admirably explores moral and physical danger, and she the first to collect these miracles and the miracles of Our Lady from the assisted in making decisions in time put them in writing. Beginning in the point of view of the history of mentali­ of trial. 8th century, the miracle accounts were ties. Specifically, the miracles present a The literary analysis of the miracle incorporated into collections of Mariology-ad usum populi-manifest­ accounts takes up an important portion exempla (accounts, legends) and ing the powerful role of Mary with sermons. At the beginning of this of the study. Beterous concludes that God, in this world, in her fight against century, Albert Poncelet mentions no the accounts do not constitute a the devil, and at the hour of death. less than 1,783 titles of Marian miracles separate literary genre, but should be Although limited geographically and written in Latin, most of these in considered a special category of the linguistically to the regions of southern multiple variations. narrative genre. The miracle stories France and northern Spain, Beterous' Between the 12th and the 14th combine popular aspects (simplicity of work has a paradigmatic character, centuries, miracle accounts written in considerations and solutions) with both methodologically and themati­ the vernacular acquired literary status more erudite aspects (literary form and cally. The author succeeds not only in and quality. They reflect a society with transmission). Their literary value establishing a meticulously qualified a hierarchical and static character, in differs from one collection to another. inventory of the collection of miracles which the strong dichotomy and Borrowing from Latin models, the under scrutiny, but also surprises the interdependence between the natural clerical authors wrote for believers reader with her comprehensive and and the supernatural order, good and whose faith related them to living qualitative approach to the material. Last but not least, Beterous' study evil, punishment and reward, pro­ persons. In the description of the offers to theologians and to Mariolo­ duced a religious outlook with strong relations, courtly literature began to gists, in particular, an admirable anthropomorphic traits and patterns. influence the miracle accounts. The example of Mariology in situ. Miracle accounts are based on a short life of this literature was a result of its lack of adaptation to new social religion of other-worldly hope and the -johann G. Roten, S.M. certitude of God's mercy; they appeal conditions. Written in a monastic and to sensitivity more than the intellect; rural context, these accounts did not they are based on extraordinary signs survive the new emerging urban and events. In addition to their moral mentality. 4 piety (the way Christianity is incar­ nated in culture) and its characteris­ tics-spontaneous, festive, open to the transcendent, based on communal memory-are considered in relation to August 5, the Dedication of the Basilica of St. Mary Major. Sometimes, "Reflection" presents the conclusions from contemporary scholarly discussions. In other cases, a Marian prerogative or title, formulated long ago but now little understood and appreciated, is given new meaning. Within the long history of theology and Marian devotion, many titles which at one time conveyed valid and AT WORSHIP WITH MARY.· A PAS­ valuable insights today appear irrele­ A DOORWAY TO SILENCE: THE TORAL AND THEOLOGICAL vant. For example, grace was once CONTEMPLATIVE USE OF THE S1VDY. Christopher O'Donnell, presented in quantitative terms, ROSARY. Robert Llewelyn. New O.Carm. Wilmington: Michael something channeled and passed on; York: Paulist Press, 1986. Glazier, 1988. in this context, Mary as "mediatrix of grace" had meaning. Now, however, The recent letter of the Sacred The original purpose of this book grace is presented not so much as Congregation for the Doctrine of the was to provide information on Marian something passed on but as a loving Faith, "Christian Meditation," acknowl­ feasts. For each of the fifteen Marian relation with the living God. What is, edges that many Christians who seek a days in the liturgical calendar, there then, the meaning of the title "media­ contemplative form of prayer look to are historical notes on the origin, trix of grace"? Mary is the model or the the East for guidance. Robert Llewelyn, exegetical notes on the readings from form through which grace is communi­ well-versed in the writings of the Scripture, and references to current cated; she is "the model which God fourteenth-century English mystic ecclesial documents which broaden uses in gracing us." Mary's person and Julian of Norwich, reminds us in this and extend the meaning of the loveliness give us the image of the little book that for the last thousand mystery celebrated. Each section person graced by God. years the West has had a prayer which concludes with suggested interces­ Through these discussions, a can be used in a contemplative way­ sions for the Prayer of the Faithful liturgical handbook becomes a com­ the Rosary. which succinctly summarize the pendium of current questions in The Rosary is a combination of dif­ ferent approaches to prayer. During its principal themes of the celebration. Mariology. The discussions are honest long history in the West, it has But this is much more than a and critical, not hesitating to deal with changed and developed. At times, it bland commentary on liturgical texts. the relation of past formulations to was a substitute for the psalter or the O'Donnell realizes that the intellect is contemporary concerns. A valuable Western version of the East's slow, not dormant in liturgy and that many bibliography is appended to each questions about theology and devo­ rhythmical repetition of the Jesus discussion. Prayer. The Pater Noster's and the Ave tion arise in the celebration of Marian The title, At Worship with Mary, is Maria's were joined in various arrange­ feasts. For each feast, he provides a well-chosen. We are frequently ments, until a Carthusian, Henry of well-informed and balanced discus­ reminded of the theocentric nature of Kalkar, suggested the formula of sion entitled "Reflection," on ques­ Marian devotion. On Mary's feasts, we fifteen decades of Ave Maria's, each tions which may occur to thoughtful "join in Mary's praise of God's good­ decade introduced by a Pater Noster. and intelligent participants in liturgy. ness to her, and through her also to Exactly 450 years ago, another Carthu­ The Solemnity of Mary, Mother of us." How does Mary contribute to our sian, Adolph of Essen, suggested that God, gives rise to a discussion of the worship? She is a model for the Church meditations on the mysteries of Christ origin and Christological significance at worship, and she provides a vision be part of praying the Ave's. Spreading of the title Theotokos. The feast of of beauty-a vision which does not devotion to the Rosary became a Our Lady of Lourdes is the occasion threaten but only draws us on. Her special work of the Dominican order. to discuss the significance of shrines feasts are moments of repose and After its official approval in 1569, the and apparitions: the discernment of refreshment on our journey. "Beauty Rosary remained unchanged until re­ apparitions and the type of belief cannot be possessed; it can only be cently. Now both papal and episcopal which they warrant; shrines as places enjoyed .. .the admiration of her beauty documents have reminded us that of pilgrimage; the centrality of the causes us to marvel also at our own." there is no one way alone in which the Eucharist at Marian shrines. Popular Rosary must be prayed. 5 The reason many may become dis­ Mary, the first to appear in English in are sustained by a belief in a God who couraged with the Rosary is that they recent years; it was written by two loves justice, the result is a Mariology have approached it with too much women-one a religious and the other rooted in the living faith. A good book energy and determination and tried to a lay person; and it is based on the for those interested in a rich reinterpre­ accomplish too much. Don John conviction that the poor, who have a tation of all we say about Mary. Chapman wrote that a simple thought special place in the Kingdom of God, in connection with each mystery was can teach much about the meaning of -Thomas A. Thompson, S.M. the best approach. "If you try to make God's Word today. Finally, it is the first a mental picture, you will waste major work on Mary from Orbis energy and get no good," he said. Books, the publishing house which Heresies are always partial Llewelyn unravels the strands in the makes available in English the writings truths and our masculinized God Rosary's development and presents us of many South American theologians. and masculinized Church will with a form of prayer, simpler than This "rereading of Mary from the always heed the fminine correc­ tive. It seems that the only way usually presented. The Rosary, or a point of view of our age" begins with to forgive Eve within us is to rosary-like prayer, is a way of keeping two chapters on underlying supposi­ invite Mary into our churches. prayer on course, of directing focus. It tions and hermeneutics. Because of the It is not accident that charis­ can become a prayer of patience and continuity between those who now matic prayer groups which have healing, of praise and thanksgiving. As "live in history" and those-Mary and a quiet but deep appreciation of Llewelyn says, the principle of the the saints-who now "live in God," the Mary, also seem to have the Rosary is more important than any experience and faith of people today fewest problems with fundamen­ particular use which we might make can speak of Mary. In place of the talism. I and others have ob­ of it. "male-centered, dualistic, idealist, and served this and at first could not In his letter on the right ordering unidimensional" approaches of the make the connection, but now it of Marian devotion, Paul VI spoke at past, the authors choose to study Mary seems apparent to me: a church length of the Rosary. Individuals are in a "human centered, unifying, realist, that sees itself as family has time free to use the Rosary in many forms, pluridimensional" way. They use the for a mother and is bored by he said, and they should be drawn to voices and aspirations of women and head-trips and ideological it because of its intrinsic appeal. the poor to show the place of Mary in wranglings. It does not really Llewelyn's small book helps us to see today's world. fight fundamentalism or even fear the Rosary in different ways and After the two opening chapters it, it just does not need it­ invites us to test its value in our lives. which establish and justify their because life is too full already! Paradoxically, and true to Julian of approach, the succeeding chapters­ Richard Rohr, O.F.M. Norwich, what is important is not how on Scripture, the Marian dogmas, and "Mary and Fundamentalism" Catholic we pray the Rosary but whether the Marian devotions-illustrate how this Chrismatic (Dec. 1978/Jan. 1979, p. 17) praying leads us to explore the loving approach can bring forth a new way of silence which lies beyond it. thinking about Mary. In every context, she is presented as deeply and inti­ Special Gifts... mately related to the concerns of (:'f) people. She is part of the Kingdom of Special Requests 1 .tt1arp God present in history. The new During the past year, many made MNb:r people of God is "begotten in the ofG:>J, special contributions. The Marianist M<'ther woman who is the figure of the Provinces of St. Louis, New York, and tf1e people." Mary's motherhood continues the Pacific contributed to a study in every place and individual where destined to analyze and improve the reign of God's Word becomes a catechetical materials on Marian living and active force. The final doctrine and Marian devotion. The chapter, "Mary and God's Wonders Marianist Provinces of Austria and among the Poor," contains an analysis Switzerland made contributions for of the Magnificat in which Mary affirms the purchase of theological materials the desire for life for God's people and in German. The Marian Library seeks donors MARY, MOTHER OF GOD, engages herself in the struggle against for the completion of the proceedings MOTHER OF THE POOR. evil. of Vatican Council II (Acta Synodalia), Ivone Gebara and Maria Clara The traditional objection to a Mariol­ the addresses and homilies of recent Bingemer. Maryknoll: ogy which arises from the people is popes, as well as several theological Orbis Books, 1989. that it will be an improverished one. journals. This book is a first in several ways: However, when the people are the it is a comprehensive approach to poor whose patience and sufferings

6 1989 Friends of The Marian Library and IMRI

We gratefully acknowledge all who have made contributions to our work in the past year Qanuary 1-December 31, 1989)

BENEFACTORS

Mr. & Mrs. John F. Britt** Rev. John Harrington, S.M. Bro. John Samaha, S.M.** Mrs. Anne M. Cassano•• Rev. Robert]. Hoeper, S.M. Rev. Bernard C. Stueve, S.M.** Mrs. Claudia Connors Mme. Mathilde Koehler* Mr. & Mrs. Frank C. Sutton Mr. & Mrs. Nick G. Crnkovich** Mrs. Dorothy Lackner* Rev. Thomas A. Thompson, S.M. Mrs. Mollie E. Danis Mrs. Mary Louise McGinnis** Rev. Joseph Uvietta, S.M. Bro. Francis A. Deibel, S.M. •• Miss Elizabeth Meder Sister John Dominic, O.P. Mrs. Helen Nykolyshyn • $500 Rev. Paul E. Duggan•• Mr. & Mrs. Michael F. Ross •• $1,000

PATRONS

Dr. William P. Anderson Mrs. Bette Rogge Morse Ms. Margaret Smart Mr. & Mrs. William R. Burleigh Mrs. Helena M. Nertyniuk St. Sophia Religious Rev. Daniel J. Cambra, M.I.C. Mr. Lewis Richter Mrs. Mary D. Thompson Mr. & Mrs. Gary Clemans Maj. & Mrs. Gary E. Roth Bro. Vincent Wottle, S.M. Rev. Msgr. John P. Kleinz Dr. Kenneth C. Schraut Bro. Bernard Zalewski, S.M. Mr. Volodymyr Makar Bro. Francis Schroepfer, S.M. Bro. Joseph H. Zeinz, S.M. Mrs. Rosalind G. Monnin Rev. Richard Schulte Staade Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Zeleznik

SUPPORTING MEMBERS

Mr. Alan A. Andolsen Ms. Irena Klos Mr. & Mrs. Edward Louis Rose Mr. Frank J. Bello Mrs. Anna Kobylecka Mrs. Varvara Savinda Rev. Eric Blumenthal Mr. Theodore Koebert Mrs. Stephanie Sawchyn Mrs. Charles F. Boeing Mr. & Mrs. Orest Koltuniuk Mrs. Marjorie F. Schram Mrs. Volodymyra Brykovycz Mr. Stepan Kraus Mr. & Mrs. Lesia Schur Mrs. Lidiia Burachynska Mr. Mykola Kurchak Mr. Donald G. Schweller Mrs. Marita D. Champion Mr. Slawko Kurczak Mrs. Ivanna Seredynska Mrs. Anne Claypole Mrs. Nadia Kuzma Mrs. Luba Sheremeta Mr. David C. Czuk Mr. & Mrs. Liubomyr Lampika Mr. & Mrs. Henry L. Sickman Mr. Walter Debaylo Ms. Rosalie J. Lekan Mrs. Halyna Skorecka, DDC Mr. & Mrs. Bohdan Deychakiwkyj Mrs. Irena Lewycka Mr. Petro Stachiv Mrs. Mariia Dziadyk Mr. Joe Luchanko Dr. & Mrs. D. L. Stachiv Dr. Robert F. Echols, DDS Mr. Constantyn Macilynskyi Mrs. Julianna Starosolska Sr. Adele M. Eisenhauer Mrs. Ivanna Maczaj Miss Anna Tobin Sugg Ms. Eleanor R. Finke Mr. Eugene E. Mauch Mr. & Mrs. Victor F. Thieman Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Fylypovych Ms. Olga Merenkov Miss Mary Margaret Toohey Mr. & Mrs. John P. Garrity Dr. & Mrs. Leonid Mostowycz, MD Mr. & Mrs. Sydir Tymiak Ms. Mary Gauvey Mr. & Mrs. Myroslav Mychkovskyi Mrs. Robert Vogelpohl Mr. & Mrs. Stepan Golash Mrs. Edward B. Ostendorf Mr. & Mrs. Zenon Wasylkevych Ms. Antoinette Graupe Ms. Marie Palidwor Mr. & Mrs. Jerome Westendorf Mr. & Mrs. Volodmyr Hrynkiv Ms. Ann T. Pater Mrs. Mriia Zubal' Mr. & Mrs. Vasyl' & Natalie Kachmar Mrs. Anna Potopnyk Mr. RichardT. Kill Mrs. Tatianna Rabii

7 1990 Friends of The Marian Library and IMRI through their contributions assist THE MARIAN LIBRARY (the world's largest collection ofMarian books) and THE INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE (a pontifical institute for Marian studies) Contributions are tax deductible. The names of members, patrons, and benefactors are published annually. . Benefactor ...... $250 Supporting Member ...... $100 Patron ...... $25 Any amount welcome.

The Marian Library/ IMRI VKarian .C ibrary University of Dayton Dayton, OH 45469-0001 'Dunur.ad 'Dy 'Brother .:Joseph ,:ills paiL S ..}t. Enclosed is my contribution of___ _ qjniverslty of 'Dayton. to The Marian Library and IMRI.

The Marian Library Bookplate, designed by Name joseph Aspell, S.M. Donors may have their Street names or names of those they wish to remember ------appear on a bookplate in The Marian Library. City/ State/ Zip------

rrtie Marian £i6rary Nonprofit Organization U.S. Postage Paid UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio Dayton, Ohio 45469-0001 Permit No. 71

Address Correction Requested

REV . JAMES FITZ , SM MARIANIS T PROVIN CIALIATE 44 35 E. PA TT ERSON BLVD CAMPUS iv1AIL