DOCSLIB.ORG

TNSR and Discusses the Joys and Pains of the Review Process, Giving Some Advice for Both Reviewers and Those Submitting Their Work for Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISSN 2576-1021 ISSN 2576-1153 Print: Online: Texas National Security Review CLARITY & QUAGMIRE Volume 2 Issue 2 MASTHEAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Staff: The Foundation Publisher: Managing Editor: 04 Reviewing Blues Ryan Evans Megan G. Oprea, PhD Assistant Editor: Francis J. Gavin Autumn Brewington Editor-in-Chief: Associate Editors: William Inboden, PhD Galen Jackson, PhD Van Jackson, PhD Stephen Tankel, PhD The Scholar 10 When Do Leaders Change Course? Theories of Success and the American Withdrawal Editorial Board: from Beirut, 1983–1984 Alexandra T. Evans and A. Bradley Potter Chair, Editorial Board: Editor-in-Chief: 40 How to Think About Nuclear Crises Francis J. Gavin, PhD William Inboden, PhD Mark S. Bell and Julia Macdonald Robert J. Art, PhD Beatrice Heuser, PhD Patrick Porter, PhD Richard Betts, PhD Michael C. Horowitz, PhD Thomas Rid, PhD John Bew, PhD Richard H. Immerman, PhD Joshua Rovner, PhD Nigel Biggar, PhD Robert Jervis, PhD Brent E. Sasley, PhD The Strategist Philip Bobbitt, JD, PhD Colin Kahl, PhD Elizabeth N. Saunders, PhD Hal Brands, PhD Jonathan Kirshner, PhD Kori Schake, PhD 68 After the Responsible Stakeholder, What? Debating America’s China Strategy Joshua W. Busby, PhD James Kraska, SJD Michael N. Schmitt, DLitt Hal Brands and Zack Cooper Robert Chesney, JD Stephen D. Krasner, PhD Jacob N. Shapiro, PhD Eliot Cohen, PhD Sarah Kreps, PhD Sandesh Sivakumaran, PhD 82 Crossroads: Counter-terrorism and the Internet Audrey Kurth Cronin, PhD Melvyn P. Leffler, PhD Sarah Snyder, PhD Brian Fishman Theo Farrell, PhD Fredrik Logevall, PhD Bartholomew Sparrow, PhD 102 The End of the End of History: Reimagining U.S. Foreign Policy for the 21st Century Peter D. Feaver, PhD Margaret MacMillan, CC, PhD Monica Duffy Toft, PhD Sen. Ben Sasse Rosemary Foot, PhD, FBA Thomas G. Mahnken, PhD Marc Trachtenberg, PhD Taylor Fravel, PhD Rose McDermott, PhD René Värk, JD Sir Lawrence Freedman, PhD Paul D. Miller, PhD Steven Weber, PhD James Goldgeier, PhD Vipin Narang, PhD Amy Zegart, PhD Michael J. Green, PhD Janne E. Nolan, PhD Kelly M. Greenhill, PhD John Owen, PhD The Roundtable Feature 116 The Persistence of Great Power Politics David M. Edelstein Policy and Strategy Advisory Board: Chair: Adm. William McRaven, Ret. Hon. Elliott Abrams, JD Hon. Kathleen Hicks, PhD Dan Runde Stephen E. Biegun Hon. James Jeffrey David Shedd Hon. Brad Carson Paul Lettow, JD, PhD Hon. Kristen Silverberg, JD Hon. Derek Chollet Hon. Michael Lumpkin Michael Singh, MBA Amb. Ryan Crocker Hon. William J. Lynn, JD Adm. James G. Stavridis, Ret., PhD Hon. Eric Edelman, PhD Kelly Magsamen Hon. Christine E. Wormuth Hon. John Hamre, PhD Gen. David Petraeus, Ret. Designed by We are Flint, printed by Linemark Reviewing Blues The chairman of our editorial board, Frank Gavin, introduces Vol. 2, Iss. 2 of TNSR and discusses the joys and pains of the review process, giving some advice for both reviewers and those submitting their work for review. am sorry to report that I do not I have countless more stories like this, but simply like this manuscript much.” As recalling them is generating a cold sweat! Francis J. Gavin academics, we have all received At the Texas National Security Review, we have such a note (and if you haven’t yet, and will continue to think long and hard about how you“I will at some point). And the negative reactions to encourage best practices in the review process. to our papers and books don’t ever go away, no We have incorporated a number of measures, matter how long you are in the profession or how including paying our reviewers on a sliding scale distinguished your title. This was the first line of depending upon how comprehensive the review is a referee report I received just last month for my and how quickly it is returned. This has made these latest book manuscript. reviews even more rigorous than the typical review. There is probably no harder part of scholarly life Believe me, I know. You may have noticed that I did than sending our work out for anonymous peer not write an introduction for the last issue. You may review. We pour our heart and soul into our work, have also noticed that an article of mine appeared in nurturing, digging, re-shaping our articles and our pages. This generated a whole lot of discussion books until we believe they are perfect. We carry and concern in our journal — how would it look for around the arguments we make and the evidence a new journal to publish an article by the chair of we’ve collected in our heads throughout the day, the editorial board? Did we have a process in place evaluating them at all hours, from when our heads to treat my article in as demanding, ethical, and hit the pillow at night to when we get into the shower thorough a way as anyone else’s? the next morning. As scholars, our arguments and To my (not always pleasant) surprise, we did. I can research both reflect who we are and how we see honestly say that my article went through the most the world. While we are intellectuals and pretend rigorous review process I have ever experienced we are completely objective, we (understandably) in over two decades of academic life. There were become deeply and personally attached to our four anonymous reviews, each well over two pages work. Our articles and books are like our children long, as well as intense internal review. All of the — we love them fiercely and, at times, irrationally, reviews were sharp and penetrating, with a raft often blind to the flaws that others see. This is what of (not always welcome) suggestions, but one in makes receiving negative reviews so unsettling, particular was especially harsh. I confess I may not especially for the young scholar. have handled the criticism in the most mature way. Stay in the business long enough, and you collect I pouted and suggested I might pull the piece and stories. Years ago, I submitted an article, “The Myth send it somewhere else, arguing that I had gotten of Flexible Response,” to a prestigious journal. One to a point in my career where I shouldn’t have to “anonymous” review was by someone who said he deal with this. Who was the “obvious” idiot TNSR was involved in the Kennedy administration policy had found to stand in judgment of my “obvious” process I was writing on and suggested that I had expertise? It was not my best moment, to say the no idea what I was talking about. The review was least. Ryan Evans — who in addition to being the handwritten and the journal forgot to remove the publisher is also one of my best friends — never initials — “CK” — at the end of the document. blinked. My piece, he stated calmly, would have to Since I had based much of my argument on the address all the criticisms if TNSR was to publish it. papers of Carl Kaysen and was quite familiar with And no, I would never find out who had reviewed his handwriting, the review was not especially my piece. After putting the article aside for a few anonymous. The journal passed on the piece. weeks, I swallowed my pride and went through Another review, which I later learned was written the critiques line by line and made the changes. by our most accomplished Cold War historian (note: Ryan and his outstanding team of editors worked no matter how hard we try not to, we all attempt to with me closely to improve the effort. The piece figure out the identity of our reviewers), asked, “Are was much better for it. And I still have no idea we sure the author does not suffer from dyslexia?” who the reviewers were, though I am grateful for 4 5 Introducing Vol. 2, Iss. 2 of TNSR: Clarity & Quagmire Reviewing Blues their extraordinary willingness to offer me honest to advance knowledge? Is the current system too Does your review offer helpful advice, demonstrate criticism and helpful recommendations (although easily gamed, or does it encourage scholars — empathy, and provide the author with guidance that reviewer number four would be an unlikely addition especially young thinkers at the height of their can help them move their project forward? And if to my holiday card list, as petty as that may be!). intellectual powers — to be risk-averse, to play the answers to these questions are “no,” might it be I tell this story for a few reasons. First, the small-ball, to write papers and books with the goal time to ask yourself some hard questions about who process of being evaluated and assessed never of getting through review, rather than expanding you are and why you are in this business? Truth be ends, no matter how long you stay in the academy. our understanding of the world? We all know the told, following the adage “don’t be a jerk” involves It is important for young people entering the reasons we have the current system, but I think it is no sacrifice of standards or smarts or rigor. Quite academy to know this. Criticism hurts deeply fair to ask whether it can be improved. Isaac Newton the contrary, in fact. and often feels unfair. To have your best work and Albert Einstein changed our understanding of Rest assured that the excellent scholarly dismissed by an unknown, anonymous voice can the world without it. Is double-blind peer review contributions in this volume went through such be devastating. The key is to remember that, no the worst way of evaluating scholarship, except all a process, and that we at TNSR are committed matter how unpleasant, the reviewer took the time the others? Or are there ways we can improve the to embracing the highest standards of scholarly to read your manuscript and take it seriously.
Recommended publications
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
  • Beyond Emboldenment Beyond Mark S

    Beyond Emboldenment Beyond Mark S

    Beyond Emboldenment Beyond Mark S. Bell Emboldenment How Acquiring Nuclear Weapons Can Change Foreign Policy What happens to the foreign policies of states when they acquire nuclear weapons? This question has grown in importance as new nuclear powers have emerged and other states have moved closer to joining the nuclear club. Indeed, determining the costs that the United States and others should be prepared to pay to prevent nuclear proliferation hinges on assessing how nuclear weapons affect the be- havior of the states that acquire them and how dangerous those effects are. If states expand their interests in world politics or act more aggressively in the aftermath of nuclear acquisition, preventing nuclear proliferation should be a higher priority than if nuclear weapons do not signiªcantly affect the for- eign policies of the states that acquire them. Crafting deterrence strategies for new nuclear states also requires understanding the foreign policy effects that nuclear weapons are likely to have in a given case.1 Despite its importance, the question of how nuclear weapons affect the for- eign policies of the states that acquire them has not been satisfactorily an- swered. The literature on nuclear weapons has generally examined the effects of nuclear weapons on outcomes other than foreign policy; has focused on the effects of nuclear weapons on the calculations of other states rather than the acquiring state; and has often sought to explore how states with nuclear weapons should behave rather than how they do behave. The literature that has examined the effects of nuclear weapons on foreign policy has tended to conºate effects of nuclear weapons under catch-all terms such as “em- boldenment” while ignoring other potential effects of nuclear acquisition.
  • H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2014)

    H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2014)

    H-Diplo | ISSF Roundtable, Volume VII, No. 2 (2014) A production of H-Diplo with the journals Security Studies, International Security, Journal of Strategic Studies, and the International Studies Association’s Security Studies Section (ISSS). http://www.issforum.org H-Diplo/ISSF Editors: James McAllister and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable and Web/Production Editor: George Fujii Commissioned for H-Diplo/ISSF by James McAllister Introduction by James McAllister Hal Brands. What Good is Grand Strategy: Power and Purpose in American Statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014. ISBN: 978-0- 8014-5246-8 (hardcover, $29.95). Published by H-Diplo/ISSF on 17 October 2014 Stable URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Roundtable-7-2.pdf Contents Introduction by James McAllister, Williams College ................................................................ 2 Review by Francis J. Gavin, MIT ................................................................................................ 4 Review by Steven Metz, U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute ............................ 8 Review by Joshua Rovner, Southern Methodist University .................................................... 11 Author’s Response by Hal Brands, Duke University ............................................................... 18 © Copyright 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable Reviews, Vol. VII, No. 2
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    Charting the CFR’s Political Dominance • Rethinking Discrimination August 10, 2020 • $3.95 www.TheNewAmerican.com THAT FREEDOM SHALL NOT PERISH DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. NEW CHINA: THE DEEP STATE’S TROJAN HORSE IN AMERICA This exposé shows that the Chinese Communist plan to subvert America is well underway, and is being aided by the Deep State. Will Americans wake up before the tipping point? By Arthur R. Thompson, CEO, The John Birch Society (2020ed, pb, 132pp, 1-11/$7.95ea; 12-23/$5.95ea; 24-49/$3.95ea; 50+/$2.95ea) BKCDSTHA ✁ Order Online: Mail completed form to: QUANTITY TITLE PRICE TOTAL PRICE ShopJBS • P.O. BOX 8040 www.ShopJBS.org APPLETON, WI 54912 Credit-card orders call toll-free now! 1-800-342-6491 Name ______________________________________________________________ Address ____________________________________________________________ SHIPPING/HANDLING WI RESIDENTS ADD City _____________________________ State __________ Zip ________________ SUBTOTAL (SEE CHART BELOW) 5.5% SALES TAX TOTAL Phone ____________________________ E-mail ______________________________ 0000 ❑ ❑ ❑ 000 0000 000 000 For shipments outside the U.S., please call for rates. Check VISA Discover 0000 0000 0000 00 Order Subtotal Standard Shipping Rush Shipping ❑ Money Order ❑ MasterCard ❑ American Express VISA/MC/Discover American Express Three Digit V-Code Four Digit V-Code $0-10.99 $6.36 $9.95 Standard: 4-14 $11.00-19.99 $7.75 $12.75 business days. Make checks payable to: ShopJBS ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ $20.00-49.99 $9.95 $14.95 Rush: 3-7 business $50.00-99.99 $13.75 $18.75 days, no P.O.
  • Understanding Strategic Interaction in the Second Nuclear Age

    Understanding Strategic Interaction in the Second Nuclear Age

    UNDERSTANDING STRATEGIC INTERACTION IN THE SECOND NUCLEAR AGE THOMAS G. MAHNKEN GILLIAN EVANS TOSHI YOSHIHARA ERIC S. EDELMAN JACK BIANCHI UNDERSTANDING STRATEGIC INTERACTION IN THE SECOND NUCLEAR AGE THOMAS G. MAHNKEN GILLIAN EVANS TOSHI YOSHIHARA ERIC EDELMAN JACK BIANCHI 2019 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2019 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Thomas G. Mahnken is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. He is a Senior Research Professor at the Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies at The Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and has served for over 20 years as an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve, to include tours in Iraq and Kosovo. He currently serves as a member of the Congressionally-mandated National Defense Strategy Commission and as a member of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps University. His previous government career includes service as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning from 2006–2009, where he helped craft the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review and 2008 National Defense Strategy. He served on the staff of the 2014 National Defense Panel, 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, and the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction.
  • Mar–Apr 2013, Volume 105, Number 4

    Mar–Apr 2013, Volume 105, Number 4

    SEPT–OCT 2011, v OlumE 104, numb Er 1 m E xi CO C i T y … grav E CO n CE rn S … hubbl E SP a CESC a PES … indian ar T … g E r T rud E himm E lfarb mar–a in theatres march 22nd P r 2013 r mar–aPr 2013, v OlumE 105, numb Er 4 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ALUMNI MAGAZINE STREET DATE: FEB/MARCH DUE DATE: 1/22 non-bleed: 6.4375” x 8.825”, 4-Color JANUARY 22, 2013 1:30 PM EST UCH_MAR_APRIL_covers and spine_v4.indd 1 2/25/13 10:40 AM 130315_FocusFeatures_Chicago.indd 1 1/23/13 8:40 AM alumniweekend June –, CELEBRATE EXCEPTIONAL UCHICAGO Register today for Alumni Weekend 2013. • HONOR outstanding achievement at the 72nd Annual Alumni Awards Ceremony. • SHOW YOUR PRIDE in UChicago at the Alumni Parade. • CELEBRATE the academic rigor and challenges that formed your UChicago experience. • REDISCOVER the intellectual destination that is UChicago. Visit alumniweekend.uchicago.edu to register today. uestions? Call 800.955.0065, e-mail [email protected], or visit alumniweekend.uchicago.edu. AlumniIFC_AlumniWeekendAd_4c.indd Weekend Mar-Apr ad_12.11.indd 4 1 2/27/13 11:1811:19 AM Features 32 adrift in the city On walks across Mexico City, historian Mauricio Tenorio Trillo finds a path to the past. By Elizabeth Station 38 decomposure An alumna mortician, medievalist, and video sage tries to change the way Americans think about death. By Michael Washburn, AM’02 46 raised voices The Sahmat collective galvanizes artists across India to create work that Mar–aPr 2013 vOLuME 105, N uMBEr 4 resists divisive politics.
  • CFR Membership Roster 2020

    CFR Membership Roster 2020

    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MEMBERSHIP ROSTER 2020 Peter Aaran David L. Aaron Steve Abbot Laura Winthrop Abbot A. Robert Abboud Labeeb M. Abboud Keith W. Abell Gina Abercrombie-Winstanley Robert John Abernethy John P. Abizaid Mona Aboelnaga Kanaan David S. Abraham Michael J. Abramowitz Elliott Abrams Michael P. Abrams Samuel J. Abrams Stacey Y. Abrams William M. Abrams Niso Abuaf Odeh F. Aburdene Elliot Ackerman Peter Ackerman Alana Ackerson Darius E. Adamczyk Gordon M. Adams Jacqueline Adams Julie Adams Marjorie A. Adams Michael F. Adams Nicolas E. Adams Tim Adams Clara L. Adams-Ender Linda L. Addison Beth Addonizio Carol C. Adelman David Adelman Richard C. Adkerson Allen R. Adler Stephen J. Adler John-Paul P. Adrian A. J. Agarwal Vinod K. Aggarwal Mukesh Aghi Robert F. Agostinelli Eric Aguiar David B. Agus Stephanie Ahern Qanta A. Ahmed Salman S. Ahmed Jasmeet K. Ahuja Sanjiv Ahuja Vikrum D. Aiyer Florence O. Akinyemi Adotei Akwei Kurt W. Albaugh Alice P. Albright Madeleine K. Albright Edward Alden Michael H. Alderman John Alexander Lewis S. Alexander Margo N. Alexander Gigi Alford William P. Alford Jonathan R. Alger Mohamad S. Ali Samar S. Ali Danielle Allen Michael Allen Jodie T. Allen John R. Allen Marc Allen Nathaniel D. Allen Richard V. Allen Ronald L. Allen Thad W. Allen Faheen Allibhoy Graham Allison Michael A. Almond Anne Alonzo Andrew M. Alper Avery M. Alpha Jonathan H. Alter Karen J. Alter Jon B. Alterman Alexandra Altman Drew Altman Elizabeth J. Altman Roger C. Altman William C. Altman David Altshuler Jose E. Alvarez Marco Alverà Amy E.
  • Copyright by Jonathan Reid Hunt 2013

    Copyright by Jonathan Reid Hunt 2013

    Copyright by Jonathan Reid Hunt 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Jonathan Reid Hunt Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Into the Bargain: The Triumph and Tragedy of Nuclear Internationalism during the Mid-Cold War, 1958-1970 Committee: Henry W. Brands, Supervisor Mark A. Lawrence, Co-Supervisor Francis J. Gavin Bruce J. Hunt Charters S. Wynn Jeremi Suri Into the Bargain: The Triumph and Tragedy of Nuclear Internationalism during the mid-Cold War, 1958-1970 by Jonathan Reid Hunt, B.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2013 Dedication To my parents, Thomas and Laurie Hunt, and my brother, Tommy, whom I cherish, and whose unconditional support and passion for learning have lighted my path even when my candle burned low. Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. --Russell-Einstein Manifesto, 1955 Acknowledgements At this moment, I cannot help but think back to all those who made this work of scholarship possible. I am struck not only by how instrumental they have been, but how they have constantly made this journey as entertaining as it was challenging and rewarding. When I arrived in the Department of History at the University of Texas at Austin, I had only the faintest idea of what I wanted to study, and an even fainter appreciation for what academic history demanded. I was fortunate to find myself among a cohort of passionate fellow graduate students and under the tutelage of a faculty of warm, patient, and dedicated scholars.
  • The National Security Agency at the Crossroads Speaker

    The National Security Agency at the Crossroads Speaker

    THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY AT THE CROSSROADS SPEAKER BIOS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2 8:30 pm EVENING ADDRESS [invitation only] Mr. John C. (Chris) Inglis retired from the Department of Defense in January 2014 following over 41 years of federal service, including 28 years at NSA and seven and a half years as its senior civilian and Deputy Director. As the NSA Deputy Director, Mr. Inglis acted as the Agency's chief operating officer, responsible for guiding and directing strategies, operations and policy. Mr. Inglis holds advanced degrees in engineering and computer science from Columbia University, Johns Hopkins University, and the George Washington University. He is also a graduate of the Kellogg Business School executive development program, the USAF Air War College, Air Command and Staff College, and Squadron Officers' School. Mr. Inglis’ military career includes over 30 years of service in the US Air Force -- nine years on active duty and twenty-one years in the Air National Guard - - from which he retired as a Brigadier General in 2006. He holds the rating of Command Pilot and commanded units at the squadron, group, and joint force headquarters levels. Mr. Inglis' significant Awards include the Clements award as the US Naval Academy's Outstanding Military Faculty member (1984), three Presidential Rank Awards (2000, 2004, 2009), the USAF Distinguished Service Medal (2006), the Boy Scouts of America Distinguished Eagle Scout Award (2009), the Director of National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal (2014), and The President’s National Security Medal (2014). THURSDAY, APRIL 3 8:50 am WELCOME REMARKS Bobby Chesney is Director of the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law and the Charles I.
  • The Foreign Service Journal, February 2006

    The Foreign Service Journal, February 2006

    FS RETIREES SPEAK OUT n LOCATION, LOCATION n REACH > GRASP 2005 TAX GUIDE INSIDE! $3.50 / FEBRUARY 2006 OREIGN ERVICE FJ O U R N A L S THE MAGAZINE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS PROFESSIONALS ON THE RIGHT TRACK? Surveying Condoleezza Rice’s First Year CONTENTS February 2006 Volume 83, No. 2 FOCUS ON SEC. RICE’S FIRST YEAR FEATURE 17 / TRANSFORMATIONAL DIPLOMACY: LIFE AFTER THE FS: MORE RETIREES SPEAK UP / 45 A WORK IN PROGRESS Retirees share stories and advice about retirement from For many at State, the Foreign Service. Condoleezza Rice’s focus on By Susan Maitra policy has come at the expense of management. By Shawn Zeller C OLUMNS D EPARTMENTS 29/ ANYWHERE, ANYTIME LETTERS / 6 PRESIDENT’S VIEWS / 5 DIPLOMACY CYBERNOTES / 10 Changes in institutional Transformational Diplomacy Takes Shape, but Basic MARKETPLACE / 12 culture and an improved IT BOOKS / 59 infrastructure will help realize Questions Remain By J. Anthony Holmes INDEX TO Secretary Rice’s vision. ADVERTISERS / 66 By Peter S. Gadzinski SPEAKING OUT / 14 AFSA TAX GUIDE / It’s Not Who You Know, 33 / PEACEBUILDING: CENTER INSERT A NEW NATIONAL SECURITY IMPERATIVE It’s Where You Serve Despite Sec. Rice’s support, the Office of the By John Allen Quintus Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization REFLECTIONS / 68 has not gotten off to a strong start. Exceeding One’s Grasp, By Peter H. Gantz Marine-Style By William V. Roebuck 39 / MCKINSEY REDUX: WHAT IT GETS RIGHT AND WRONG The McKinsey and Company management consulting firm’s latest report, “Winning the Next Phase of the War for Talent,” generally gives State high marks.
  • World Order Power and Strategy.Pdf (9.473Mb)

    World Order Power and Strategy.Pdf (9.473Mb)

    Texas Volume 1, Issue 1 December 2017 Print: ISSN 2576-1021 National Online: ISSN 2576-1153 Security Review WORLD ORDER, POWER, & STRATEGY Volume 1 Issue 1 MASTHEAD Staff: Publisher: Managing Editor: Copy Editors: Ryan Evans Megan G. Oprea, PhD Autumn Brewington Sara Gebhardt, PhD Editor-in-Chief: Associate Editors: Katelyn Gough William Inboden, PhD Van Jackson, PhD Stephen Tankel, PhD Celeste Ward Gventer Editorial Board: Chair, Editorial Board: Editor-in-Chief: Francis J. Gavin, PhD William Inboden, PhD Robert J. Art, PhD Beatrice Heuser, PhD John Owen, PhD Richard Betts, PhD Michael C. Horowitz, PhD Thomas Rid, PhD John Bew, PhD Richard H. Immerman, PhD Joshua Rovner, PhD Nigel Biggar, PhD Robert Jervis, PhD Elizabeth N. Saunders, PhD Hal Brands, PhD Colin Kahl, PhD Kori Schake, PhD Joshua W. Busby, PhD Jonathan Kirshner, PhD Michael N. Schmitt, JD Robert Chesney, JD James Kraska, JD Jacob N. Shapiro, PhD Eliot Cohen, PhD Stephen D. Krasner, PhD Sandesh Sivakumaran, PhD Audrey Kurth Cronin, PhD Sarah Kreps, PhD Sarah Snyder, PhD Theo Farrell, PhD Melvyn P. Leffler, PhD Bartholomew Sparrow, PhD Peter D. Feaver, PhD Fredrik Logevall, PhD Monica Duffy Toft, PhD Rosemary Foot, PhD, FBA Margaret MacMillan, CC, PhD Marc Trachtenberg, PhD Taylor Fravel, PhD Thomas G. Mahnken, PhD René Värk, SJD Sir Lawrence Freedman, PhD Rose McDermott, PhD Steven Weber, PhD James Goldgeier, PhD Paul D. Miller, PhD Amy Zegart, PhD Michael J. Green, PhD Vipin Narang, PhD Kelly M. Greenhill, PhD Janne E. Nolan, PhD Policy and Strategy Advisory Board: Chair: Adm. William McRaven, Ret. Hon. Elliott Abrams, JD Hon.
  • Understanding Strategic Interaction in the Second Nuclear Age

    Understanding Strategic Interaction in the Second Nuclear Age

    UNDERSTANDING STRATEGIC INTERACTION IN THE SECOND NUCLEAR AGE THOMAS G. MAHNKEN GILLIAN EVANS TOSHI YOSHIHARA ERIC S. EDELMAN JACK BIANCHI UNDERSTANDING STRATEGIC INTERACTION IN THE SECOND NUCLEAR AGE THOMAS G. MAHNKEN GILLIAN EVANS TOSHI YOSHIHARA ERIC EDELMAN JACK BIANCHI 2019 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2019 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Thomas G. Mahnken is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. He is a Senior Research Professor at the Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies at The Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and has served for over 20 years as an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve, to include tours in Iraq and Kosovo. He currently serves as a member of the Congressionally-mandated National Defense Strategy Commission and as a member of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps University. His previous government career includes service as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning from 2006–2009, where he helped craft the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review and 2008 National Defense Strategy. He served on the staff of the 2014 National Defense Panel, 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, and the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction.