On Dating Proto-Indoeuropean Via Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Dating Proto-Indoeuropean Via Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference On dating Proto-Indoeuropean via Bayesian phylogenetic inference Igor Yanovich1, Armin Buch, Johannes Dellert, Marisa K¨ollner,Fabr´ıcio Marcel Ferraz Gerardi, Roland M¨uhlenbernd, Johannes Wahle and Gerhard J¨ager2 Institute of Linguistics, T¨ubingenUniversity 1Carnegie Mellon 2Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study MPI for the Science of Human History, Jena October 13, 2015 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 1 / 38 Phylogenetic age constraints J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 2 / 38 Bouckaert et al: based (mostly) on written record this study upper and lower limit: derive upper and lower confined to last two limits from archaeological millenia findings only lower limit: go up to last four millenia J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 3 / 38 Proto-Indo-Iranian Indo-Iranian Identification of Proto-II with Andronovo culture (Kuz'ima 2007) accepted by (some) proponents both of Anatolian and of Steppe theory time constraint: 1900{1600 BCE \Following the dissolution of the Balkan PIE linguistic area it seems likely that there was some further and significant punctuation episode in the Pontic steppe area which motivated the eastern dispersal of early Indo-Iranian into areas where the Early Steppe form of (Proto) IE had already been spoken for some time. Early Indo-Iranian is often correlated with the Andronovo culture of the Eurasian steppes, seen after 2000 BC (Kuzmina 1994)" Renfrew 1999 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 4 / 38 The Tocharian split Tocharian Steppe theory (Anthony): migration from the steppe towards the Altai mountain ca. 3300{3000 BCE Anatolian theory (Renfrew 1999): eastward migration from the Balkans into the steppes archaeological evidence for intense cultural exchange between steppes and the Balkans by the end of the 4th millenium if identified with Tocharian split, this also gives a time constraint ca. 3300{3000 BCE J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 5 / 38 Phylogenetic age constraints J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 6 / 38 Replication of Bouckaert et al 175 150 125 100 Frequency 75 50 25 0 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 treeModel.rootHeight mean: 7685 BP; 95% HDI: 6053{9545 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 7 / 38 Adding Indo-Iranian constraint 175 150 125 100 Frequency 75 50 25 0 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 treeModel.rootHeight mean: 7162 BP; 95% HDI: 5525{8931 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 8 / 38 Adding Tocharian constraint 200 175 150 125 100 Frequency 75 50 25 0 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 treeModel.rootHeight mean: 7295 BP; 95% HDI: 5316{8982 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 9 / 38 Adding both constraints 250 200 150 Frequency 100 50 0 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 treeModel.rootHeight mean: 7139 BP; 95% HDI: 5782{8622 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 10 / 38 Adding both constraints Lycian Luvian Hittite Wakhi Iron_Ossetic Digor_Ossetic Avestan Old_Persian Afghan Waziri Tadzik Persian_List Kurdish Baluchi Romani Singhalese Urdu Lahnda Hindi Sindhi Marwari Gujarati Marathi Bengali Oriya Assamese Bihari Nepali_List Kashmiri Vedic_Sanskrit Oscan Umbrian Catalan Spanish Portuguese_ST French Walloon Provencal Friulian Italian Romansh Ladin Sardinian_L Sardinian_C Sardinian_N Romanian_List Vlach Latin Breton_ST Breton_SE Breton_List Cornish Welsh_N Welsh_C Irish_A Scots_Gaelic Old_Irish Gothic Old_English English_ST Old_High_German Luxembourgish German_ST Frisian Flemish Dutch_List Old_Norse Faroese Icelandic_ST Riksmal Danish Swedish_VL Swedish_Up Swedish_List Old_Church_Slavonic Serbocroatian Macedonian Bulgarian Slovenian Russian Polish Ukrainian Byelorussian Czech Slovak Czech_E Lusatian_L Lusatian_U Latvian Lithuanian_ST Old_Prussian Armenian_List Armenian_Mod Classical_Armenian Albanian_Top Albanian_G Albanian_K Albanian_C Ancient_Greek Greek_ML Greek_Mod Tocharian_B Tocharian_A 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 11 / 38 Summary 10000 9000 8000 7000 treeModel.rootHeight 6000 5000 IE2011_RelaxedCovarion_AllSingletonsGeo.logtreeModel.rootHeight IE2011_InIr.logtreeModel.rootHeight IE2011_Tocharian.logtreeModel.rootHeight IE2011_InIr_Tocharian.logtreeModel.rootHeight Bayes factor Steppe Theory vs. Anatolian Theory goes up from 1:1 to 4:1 J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 12 / 38 And now for something completely different... J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 13 / 38 Borrowings in IELex general policy: loanwords are manually identified and marked as such usually excluded in phylogenetic analyses typical example: mountain (borrowed into English from French) sometimes decision is controversial: Russian sobaka `dog' is assigned to the same cognate class as German Hund, but there is a debate in the literature whether it is an Iranian or a Turkic loan (it is certainly not inherited) deep borrowings might not be recognizable as such Impact on phylogenetic inference? J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 14 / 38 Semi-automatic loanword detection In an ideal phylogeny, each cognate class should emerge exactly once (it might get lost several times). ) Dollo-model of character evolution parallel changes 0 ! 1 possibly indicative for borrowing There might be other reasons, such as parallel semantic change wrong phylogeny incomplete sampling of synonyms ::: this talk: Maximum likelihood character state reconstruction manual identification of parallel changes J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 15 / 38 Semi-automatic loanword detection Hittite ● Luvian ● Tocharian B ●Tocharian A ●Classical Armenian ● Armenian List ● Armenian Mod Ancient Greek ● ● Greek K ● Greek Mod ● Tsakonian ● Greek Md ● Greek D ● Greek Ml Gothic ● ● Old English ●Old High German ● Frisian ● Afrikaans ● Dutch List ● Flemish ● German ● Standard German Munich ● Pennsylvania Dutch ● Letzebuergesch ● Schwyzerduetsch Old Gutnish ● ● Old Swedish ● Faroese ● Icelandic St Old Norse ● ● Norwegian ● Stavangersk ● Danish Fjolde ● Danish ● Oevdalian ● Gutnish Lau ● Swedish ● Swedish Vl ● Swedish Up ● Gaulish Old Irish ● ● Manx ● Gaelic Scots ● Irish B ● Irish A Old Cornish ● ● Old Welsh ● Welsh N ● Welsh C ● Cornish ● Breton St ● Breton List ● Breton Se Latin ● ● Rumanian List ● Vlach ● Sardinian L ● Sardinian N ● Sardinian C ● Italian ● Dolomite Ladino ● Friulian ● Ladin ● Romansh ● Provencal ● French ● Walloon ● Catalan ● Portuguese St ● Brazilian Old Prussian ● ● Latvian ● Lithuanian St ● Lithuanian O Old Church Slavonic ● ● Slovenian ● Serbocroatian P ● Serbian ● Serbocroatian ● Macedonian P ● Macedonian ● Bulgarian ● Bulgarian P ● Slovenian P ● Russian P ● Russian ● Ukrainian P ● Byelorussian P ● Byelorussian ● Ukrainian ● Polish ● Polish P ● Lower Sorbian ● Upper Sorbian ● Czech P ● Slovak P ● Czech ● Czech E ● Slovak ● Prasun ● Kati ● Ashkun Avestan ● ● Sogdian ● Ossetic ● Iron Ossetic ● Digor Ossetic ● Wakhi ● Sariqoli ● Shughni ● Waziri ● Pashto ● Persian ● Tadzik ● Baluchi ● Zazaki ● Kurdish Vedic Sanskrit ● ● Kashmiri ● Singhalese ● Gypsy Gk ● Khaskura ● Nepali ● Bihari ● Bengali ● Oriya ● Assamese ● Marathi ● Gujarati ● Marwari ● Sindhi ● Magahi ● Hindi ● Urdu ● Panjabi St dog:A ● Lahnda J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 16 / 38 Semi-automatic loanword detection Hittite ● Luvian ● Tocharian B ●Tocharian A ●Classical Armenian ● Armenian List ● Armenian Mod Ancient Greek ● ● Greek K ● Greek Mod ● Tsakonian ● Greek Md ● Greek D ● Greek Ml Gothic ● ● Old English ●Old High German ● Frisian ● Afrikaans ● Dutch List ● Flemish ● German ● Standard German Munich ● Pennsylvania Dutch ● Letzebuergesch ● Schwyzerduetsch Old Gutnish ● ● Old Swedish ● Faroese ● Icelandic St Old Norse ● ● Norwegian ● Stavangersk ● Danish Fjolde ● Danish ● Oevdalian ● Gutnish Lau ● Swedish ● Swedish Vl ● Swedish Up ● Gaulish Old Irish ● ● Manx ● Gaelic Scots ● Irish B ● Irish A Old Cornish ● ● Old Welsh ● Welsh N ● Welsh C ● Cornish ● Breton St ● Breton List ● Breton Se Latin ● ● Rumanian List ● Vlach ● Sardinian L ● Sardinian N ● Sardinian C ● Italian ● Dolomite Ladino ● Friulian ● Ladin ● Romansh ● Provencal ● French ● Walloon ● Catalan ● Portuguese St ● Brazilian Old Prussian ● ● Latvian ● Lithuanian St ● Lithuanian O Old Church Slavonic ● ● Slovenian ● Serbocroatian P ● Serbian ● Serbocroatian ● Macedonian P ● Macedonian ● Bulgarian ● Bulgarian P ● Slovenian P ● Russian P ● Russian ● Ukrainian P ● Byelorussian P ● Byelorussian ● Ukrainian ● Polish ● Polish P ● Lower Sorbian ● Upper Sorbian ● Czech P ● Slovak P ● Czech ● Czech E ● Slovak ● Prasun ● Kati ● Ashkun Avestan ● ● Sogdian ● Ossetic ● Iron Ossetic ● Digor Ossetic ● Wakhi ● Sariqoli ● Shughni ● Waziri ● Pashto ● Persian ● Tadzik ● Baluchi ● Zazaki ● Kurdish Vedic Sanskrit ● ● Kashmiri ● Singhalese ● Gypsy Gk ● Khaskura ● Nepali ● Bihari ● Bengali ● Oriya ● Assamese ● Marathi ● Gujarati ● Marwari ● Sindhi ● Magahi ● Hindi ● Urdu ● Panjabi St dog:B ● Lahnda J¨ager,Yanovich et al. (T¨u) On phylogenetic dates MPI Jena 17 / 38 Semi-automatic loanword detection Hittite ● Luvian ● Tocharian B ●Tocharian A ●Classical Armenian ● Armenian List ● Armenian Mod Ancient Greek ● ● Greek K ● Greek Mod ● Tsakonian ● Greek Md ● Greek D ● Greek Ml Gothic ● ● Old English ●Old High German ● Frisian
Recommended publications
  • The Influence of Old Norse on the English Language
    Antonius Gerardus Maria Poppelaars HUSBANDS, OUTLAWS AND KIDS: THE INFLUENCE OF OLD NORSE ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HUSBANDS, OUTLAWS E KIDS: A INFLUÊNCIA DO NÓRDICO ANTIGO NA LÍNGUA INGLESA Antonius Gerardus Maria Poppelaars1 Abstract: What have common English words such as husbands, outlaws and kids and the sentence they are weak to do with Old Norse? Yet, all these examples are from Old Norse, the Norsemen’s language. However, the Norse influence on English is underestimated as the Norsemen are viewed as barbaric, violent pirates. Also, the Norman occupation of England and the Great Vowel Shift have obscured the Old Norse influence. These topics, plus the Viking Age, the Scandinavian presence in England, as well as the Old Norse linguistic influence on English and the supposed French influence of the Norman invasion will be described. The research for this etymological article was executed through a descriptive- qualitative approach. Concluded is that the Norsemen have intensively influenced English due to their military supremacy and their abilities to adaptation. Even the French-Norman French language has left marks on English. Nowadays, English is a lingua franca, leading to borrowings from English to many languages, which is often considered as invasive. But, English itself has borrowed from other languages, maintaining its proper character. Hence, it is hoped that this article may contribute to a greater acknowledgement of the Norse influence on English and undermine the scepticism towards the English language as every language has its importance. Keywords: Old Norse Loanwords, English Language, Viking Age, Etymology. Resumo: O que têm palavras inglesas comuns como husbands, outlaws e kids e a frase they are weak a ver com os Nórdicos? Todos esses exemplos são do nórdico antigo, a língua dos escandinavos.
    [Show full text]
  • Binary Tree — up to 3 Related Nodes (List Is Special-Case)
    trees 1 are lists enough? for correctness — sure want to efficiently access items better than linear time to find something want to represent relationships more naturally 2 inter-item relationships in lists 1 2 3 4 5 List: nodes related to predecessor/successor 3 trees trees: allow representing more relationships (but not arbitrary relationships — see graphs later in semester) restriction: single path from root to every node implies single path from every node to every other node (possibly through root) 4 natural trees: phylogenetic tree image: Ivicia Letunic and Mariana Ruiz Villarreal, via the tool iTOL (Interative Tree of Life), via Wikipedia 5 natural trees: phylogenetic tree (zoom) image: Ivicia Letunic and Mariana Ruiz Villarreal, via the tool iTOL (Interative Tree of Life), via Wikipedia 6 natural trees: Indo-European languages INDO-EUROPEAN ANATOLIAN Luwian Hittite Carian Lydian Lycian Palaic Pisidian HELLENIC INDO-IRANIAN DORIAN Mycenaean AEOLIC INDO-ARYAN Doric Attic ACHAEAN Aegean Northwest Greek Ionic Beotian Vedic Sanskrit Classical Greek Arcado Thessalian Tsakonian Koine Greek Epic Greek Cypriot Sanskrit Prakrit Greek Maharashtri Gandhari Shauraseni Magadhi Niya ITALIC INSULAR INDIC Konkani Paisaci Oriya Assamese BIHARI CELTIC Pali Bengali LATINO-FALISCAN SABELLIC Dhivehi Marathi Halbi Chittagonian Bhojpuri CONTINENTAL Sinhalese CENTRAL INDIC Magahi Faliscan Oscan Vedda Maithili Latin Umbrian Celtiberian WESTERN INDIC HINDUSTANI PAHARI INSULAR Galatian Classical Latin Aequian Gaulish NORTH Bhil DARDIC Hindi Urdu CENTRAL EASTERN
    [Show full text]
  • Kashubian INDO-IRANIAN IRANIAN INDO-ARYAN WESTERN
    2/27/2018 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/IndoEuropeanTree.svg INDO-EUROPEAN ANATOLIAN Luwian Hittite Carian Lydian Lycian Palaic Pisidian HELLENIC INDO-IRANIAN DORIAN Mycenaean AEOLIC INDO-ARYAN Doric Attic ACHAEAN Aegean Northwest Greek Ionic Beotian Vedic Sanskrit Classical Greek Arcado Thessalian Tsakonian Koine Greek Epic Greek Cypriot Sanskrit Prakrit Greek Maharashtri Gandhari Shauraseni Magadhi Niya ITALIC INSULAR INDIC Konkani Paisaci Oriya Assamese BIHARI CELTIC Pali Bengali LATINO-FALISCAN SABELLIC Dhivehi Marathi Halbi Chittagonian Bhojpuri CONTINENTAL Sinhalese CENTRAL INDIC Magahi Faliscan Oscan Vedda Maithili Latin Umbrian Celtiberian WESTERN INDIC HINDUSTANI PAHARI INSULAR Galatian Classical Latin Aequian Gaulish NORTH Bhil DARDIC Hindi Urdu CENTRAL EASTERN Vulgar Latin Marsian GOIDELIC BRYTHONIC Lepontic Domari Ecclesiastical Latin Volscian Noric Dogri Gujarati Kashmiri Haryanvi Dakhini Garhwali Nepali Irish Common Brittonic Lahnda Rajasthani Nuristani Rekhta Kumaoni Palpa Manx Ivernic Potwari Romani Pashayi Scottish Gaelic Pictish Breton Punjabi Shina Cornish Sindhi IRANIAN ROMANCE Cumbric ITALO-WESTERN Welsh EASTERN Avestan WESTERN Sardinian EASTERN ITALO-DALMATIAN Corsican NORTH SOUTH NORTH Logudorese Aromanian Dalmatian Scythian Sogdian Campidanese Istro-Romanian Istriot Bactrian CASPIAN Megleno-Romanian Italian Khotanese Romanian GALLO-IBERIAN Neapolitan Ossetian Khwarezmian Yaghnobi Deilami Sassarese Saka Gilaki IBERIAN Sicilian Sarmatian Old Persian Mazanderani GALLIC SOUTH Shahmirzadi Alanic
    [Show full text]
  • Information Transport and Evolutionary Dynamics
    Information Transport and Evolutionary Dynamics Marc Harper NIMBioS Workshop April 2015 Thanks to I NIMBioS I John Baez I All the participants Motivation Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (1987) The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is in principle capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity. Motivation Donald T. Campbell, Evolutionary Epistemology (1974) A blind-variation-and-selective-retention process is fundamental to all inductive achievements, to all genuine increases in knowledge, to all increases in the fit of system to environment. Ronald Fisher, The Design of Experiments (1935) Inductive inference is the only process known to us by which essentially new knowledge comes into the world. Universal Darwinism Richard Dawkins proposed a theory of evolutionary processes called Universal Darwinism( The Selfish Gene, 1976), later developed further by Daniel Dennett (Darwin's Dangerous Idea, 1995) and others. An evolutionary process consists of I Replicating entities that have heritable traits I Variation of the traits and/or entities I Selection of variants favoring those more fit to their environment See also Donald T. Campbell's BVSR: Blind Variation and Selective Retention (1960s) Replication What is replication? The proliferation of some static or dynamic pattern (Lila, Robert Pirsig, 1991). A replicator is something that replicates: I Biological organisms I Cells I Some organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts Hummert et al. Evolutionary game theory: cells as players. Molecular BioSystems (2014) Replication Molecular replicators: I Genes, transposons, bacterial plasmids I Self-replicating RNA strands (Spiegelman's monster) I Viruses, RNA viruses (naked RNA strands) I Prions, self-replicating proteins e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialects of the North Germanic Language Group
    Scandinavian language dialects of the North Germanic language group 1 What is Norwegian? When Einar Haugen listed his ecological questions about a language, he was thinking about “Norwegian”, but he wasn’t even sure how to define “Norwegian”, because Norwegians had several different ways of speaking, and Norway even had two official written languages. Also, Haugen knew that the “Norwegian” he heard in the USA was different from the “Norwegian” he heard in Norway; and yet he could easily communicate with various types of Norwegians, as well as with Danes and with others in Scandinavia. To understand this situation, let’s begin, as Haugen did, by considering the history of the Norwegian dialects. Where did they come from? (1) What is the historical linguistic description of the language? How is it diachronically related to other languages? 2 the North Germanic language history Today’s North Germanic dialects are descendent from Old Norse. The map shows the two Old Norse dialect areas, as well as other Germanic dialect areas of the early 10th century: Old West Norse dialect Old East Norse dialect Old Gutnish Old English Crimean Gothic Other Germanic languages (somewhat mutually intelligible with Old Norse) The Old West Norse dialect was also spoken in Greenland. 3 current Scandinavian dialects These 18 Scandinavian dialects, spoken in 5 European countries, form a dialect continuum of mutual intelligibility. Elfdalian is sometimes considered a West Scandinavian dialect. In general, the East Scandinavian dialects are spoken in Denmark and Sweden, and the other dialects are spoken in Norway, Iceland, and the Faroe Islands. 4 insular vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grouping of the Germanic Languages: a Critical Review Michael-Christopher Todd Highlander University of South Carolina - Columbia
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2014 The Grouping of the Germanic Languages: A Critical Review Michael-Christopher Todd Highlander University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the German Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Highlander, M. T.(2014). The Grouping of the Germanic Languages: A Critical Review. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2587 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Grouping of the Germanic Languages: A Critical Review by Michael-Christopher Todd Highlander Bachelor of Arts University of Virginia, 2012 ______________________________ Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in German College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2014 Accepted by: Kurt Goblirsch, Director of Thesis Yvonne Ivory, Reader Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Abstract The literature regarding the grouping of the Germanic languages will be reviewed and a potential solution to the problems of the division of the Germanic languages will be proposed. Most of the Germanic languages share a great number of similarities, and individual languages often have features common to more than one which complicates the grouping. The grouping of the Germanic languages has been debated by linguists since the 19th century, and there are still dissenting views on this topic. Old English, Old Low Franconian and Old Saxon pose significant issues with regard to grouping, and the research for this thesis will attempt to clarify where these languages fit with other Germanic languages and what the best classification of the Germanic languages would be.
    [Show full text]
  • V2-Imperatives in Modern High German and Old Norse
    Hugvísindasvið V2-imperatives in Modern High German and Old Norse With a few remarks on the diachrony and closely related languages Ritgerð til MA-prófs í almennum málvísindum Felix Knuth Ágúst 2013 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Almenn málvísindi V2-imperatives in Modern High German and Old Norse With a few remarks on the diachrony and closely related languages Ritgerð til MA-prófs í almennum málvísindum Felix Knuth Leiðbeinandi: Þórhallur Eyþórsson Ágúst 2013 Abstract This thesis explores the phenomenon of verb-second imperative clauses in Modern High German as well as in Old Norse. While imperative clauses in the Germanic languages typically begin with a verb in imperative mood, both Old Norse and Modern High German feature some imperative clauses with regard to which this is not the case. These imperative clauses variously feature constituents such as a pronominal subject, an object noun phrase, an adjective or various other (and especially in the case of German, sometimes more complex) constituents as entities that may precede the imperative verb in an imperative clause. First, it will be analysed in separate chapters which types of constituents are allowed in these clauses in Old Norse, before a short look on Modern Scandinavian and especially Modern Icelandic is taken. After this, the Modern High German situation will be demonstrated, upon which similarities and differences in the distribution of constituents preceding an imperative verb between Modern High German and Old Norse can be evaluated. As will turn out, a special class of (most often verb-second) imperative clauses, namely imperatives in complement clauses (that-clauses), occurs in Old Norse as well as older West Germanic varieties, but is entirely absent from Modern High German.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Word Meanings Inferring the Directionality of Semantic Change from Word Lists
    The phylogeny of word meanings Inferring the directionality of semantic change from word lists Gerhard Jäger joint work with Alla Münch and Johannes Dellert Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Tübingen Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin January 26, 2016 Gerhard Jäger (Tübingen) Phylogeny of word meanings 1/26/2016 1 / 65 Evolution and language change “The formation of different languages and of distinct species, and the proofs that both have been developed through a gradual process, are curiously parallel. [...] We find in distinct languages striking homologies due to community of descent, and analogies due to a similar process of formation. The manner in which certain letters or sounds change when others change is very like correlated growth. [...] The frequent presence of rudiments, both in languages and in species, is still more remarkable. [...] Languages, like organic beings, can be classed in groups under groups; and they can be classed either naturally according to descent, or artificially by other characters. Dominant languages and dialects spread widely, and lead to the gradual extinction of other tongues.” (Darwin, The Descent of Man) Gerhard Jäger (Tübingen) Phylogeny of word meanings 1/26/2016 2 / 65 Evolution and language change Vater Unser im Himmel, geheiligt werde Dein Name Onze Vader in de Hemel, laat Uw Naam geheiligd worden Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name Fader Vor, du som er i himlene! Helliget vorde dit navn Gerhard Jäger (Tübingen) Phylogeny of word meanings 1/26/2016 3 / 65 Evolution and language change Gerhard Jäger
    [Show full text]
  • Investigatng the Potential of Ancestral State Reconstruction Algorithms In
    Investigating the potential of ancestral state reconstruction algorithms in historical linguistics Gerhard Jäger & Johann-Mattis List Tübingen University & CRLAO / Team AIRE, Paris Capturing Phylogenetic Algorithms for Linguistics, Leiden October 28, 2015 Jäger & List (Tübingen/Paris) Ancestral state reconstruction Leiden 1 / 42 Introduction What is Ancestral State Reconstruction? While tree-building methods seek to find branching diagrams which explain how a language family has evolved, ASR methods use the branching diagrams in order to explain what has evolved concretely. Ancestral state reconstruction is very common in evolutionary biology but only spuriously practiced in computational historical linguistics (Bouchard-Côté et al. 2013). In classical historical linguistics, on the other hand, linguistic reconstruction of proto-forms and proto-meanings is very common and one of the main goals of the classical comparative method (Fox 1995). Jäger & List (Tübingen/Paris) Ancestral state reconstruction Leiden 2 / 42 Introduction ASR of Lexical Replacement Patterns If we look for words corresponding to one meaning in a wordlist and know which of the words are cognate or not, we may ask which of the word forms was the most likely candidate to be used in the proto-language of all descendant languages. This question resembles the task of “semantic reconstruction”, but in contrast to classical semantic reconstruction, we are only operating within one concept slot here, disregarding all words with a different meaning which may also be cognate with the words in our sample. As a result of this restriction, it is quite likely that we cannot recover the original form from our data. It is, however, very interesting to see to which degree we can propose a good candidate word form (cognate set) for the proto-language.
    [Show full text]
  • Elfdalian Nasal Vowels from the Perspective of Diachronic Dialectology and Germanic Etymology
    On the origins of the Elfdalian nasal vowels from the perspective of diachronic dialectology and Germanic etymology Guus Kroonen Post doctoral scholar Roots of Europe ‐ Language, Culture, and Migrations Institute for Scandinavian Studies and Linguistics [email protected] www.rootsofeurope.ku.dk 1. Introduction Elfdalian (autonym Övdalsk or Dalklska, Sw. Älv da ls ka) is a variety of Dalecarlian spoken by some 3,000 to 5,000 ihbittinhabitants of the former parish of Övdaln in the Upper Siljan Region, Upper Dalarna, Sweden (Sapir 2005). According to Dahl (2005), the distance between Swedish and the Upper Siljan vernaculars, to which Elfdalian belongs, is comparable to the one between Swedish and Icelandic or Faroese, and is much greater than the distance between Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. Dias 2 1. Introduction Quantifying linguistic distance Elfdalian in many aspects classifies as a separate language rather than a Swedish dialect. It shows striking archaisms as well as innovations both on the phonological, the morphological and the lexical level (Dahl 2005; Sapir 2005). Innovation/archaism Icel. Elfd. Sw. RtReten tion of Old Norse shthort sylla bles no yes no Retention of the ON fricatives ð and ǥ yes yes no Retention of the ON dative case yes yes no Diphthongization of ON *ī (> ai) no yes no Central Scandinavian vowel harmony no yes no For some lexical idiosyncracies, cf. the archaism rakke ‘dog’ (ON, Icel. rakki) and the innovation brinde ‘elk’ (derived from Elfd., Nw. dial. brunda ‘to be in heat’ (cf. Nw. dial. brund ‘1. rut, 2. male elk’). Dias 3 2. The nasal vowels of Elfdalian 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliterary Scandinavian Sound Change Viewed from the East
    Nordica Helsingiensia 54 PRELITERARY SCANDINAVIAN SOUND CHANGE VIEWED FROM THE EAST UMLAUT REMODELLED AND LANGUAGE CONTACT REVISITED Johan Schalin (med utförlig resumé på svenska) ACADEMIC DISSERTATION AKADEMISK AVHANDLING to be publicly discussed, by due som med tillstånd av Humanistiska permission of the Faculty of Arts fakulteten vid Helsingfors universitet at the University of Helsinki in framlägges till offentlig gransk- lecture hall 5, University Main ning i universitetets huvudbyggnad, Building (Fabianinkatu 33), on the sal 5 (Fabiansgatan 33) tisdagen 11th of September, 2018 at 12 o’clock. den 11 september 2018 kl. 12. _______________________________________________________________________ Nordica Department of Finnish, Finno- Finskugriska och Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies nordiska avdelningen University of Helsinki Helsingfors universitet 2018 © 2018 Johan Schalin, with publishers of original papers and the Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. This book is number 54 in the series Nordica Helsingiensia, published by the Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Denna bok utgör nummer 54 i publikationsserien Nordica Helsingiensia. Publisher/Utgivare: Finskugriska och nordiska avdelningen Nordica PB 24 (Unionsgatan 40) FIN-00014 Helsingfors universitet Finland Printed in Finland by Unigrafia, Helsinki 2018 Tryck: Unigrafia, Helsingfors 2018 ISSN 1795-4428 ISBN 978-951-51-4386-0 (paperback/hft) ISBN 978-951-51-4387-7 (PDF) UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, Faculty of Arts Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies Scandinavian languages Johan Schalin, 2018. Preliterary Scandinavian sound change viewed from the east: Umlaut remodelled and language contact revisited. Abstract In this compilation thesis the author pursues an improved diachronic phonological understanding of reconstructed pre-documentary Scandinavian language, with more in-depth consideration given to its vowel history, its eastern vernaculars and the lexical traces of contact with Finnic.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammaticalization in the North Noun Phrase Morphosyntax in Scandinavian Vernaculars
    Grammaticalization in the North Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars Östen Dahl language Studies in Diversity Linguistics 6 science press Studies in Diversity Linguistics Chief Editor: Martin Haspelmath Consulting Editors: Fernando Zúñiga, Peter Arkadiev, Ruth Singer, Pilar Valen zuela In this series: 1. Handschuh, Corinna. A typology of marked-S languages. 2. Rießler, Michael. Adjective attribution. 3. Klamer, Marian (ed.). The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. 4. Berghäll, Liisa. A grammar of Mauwake (Papua New Guinea). 5. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami. 6. Dahl, Östen. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. 7. Schackow, Diana. A grammar of Yakkha. ISSN: 2363-5568 Grammaticalization in the North Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars Östen Dahl language science press Östen Dahl. 2015. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 6). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/73 © 2015, Östen Dahl Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-944675-57-2 ISSN: 2363-5568 Cover and concept of design: Ulrike Harbort Typesetting: Felix Kopecky, Sebastian Nordhoff Fonts: Linux Libertine, Arimo Typesetting software:Ǝ X LATEX Language Science Press Habelschwerdter Allee 45 14195 Berlin, Germany langsci-press.org Storage and cataloguing done by FU Berlin Language Science Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, ac- curate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]