DOCSLIB.ORG

Proclamation 6848—Death of Yitzhak

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proclamation 6848—Death of Yitzhak Administration of William J. Clinton, 1995 / Nov. 5 1987 Now it falls to us, all those in Israel, and other facilities abroad, including all mili- throughout the Middle East, and around the tary facilities and naval vessels and stations. world who yearn for and love peace to make In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set sure it doesn't happen. my hand this fourth day of November, in the Yitzhak Rabin was my partner and my year of our Lord nineteen hundred and nine- friend. I admired him, and I loved him very ty-five, and of the Independence of the much. Because words cannot express my true United States of America the two hundred feelings, let me just say, shalom, chaver, and twentieth. goodbye, friend. William J. Clinton NOTE: The President spoke at 5:48 p.m. in the [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, Rose Garden at the White House. In his remarks, 11:26 a.m., November 6, 1995] he referred to Prime Minister Rabin's widow, NOTE: This proclamation was published in the Leah. Federal Register on November 7. Proclamation 6848ÐDeath of Statement of Condolence on the Yitzhak Rabin Death of Prime Minister Rabin November 4, 1995 November 5, 1995 By the President of the United States Prime Minister Rabin gave his life to of America Israel, first as a soldier for its freedom, then finally as a martyr for its lasting peace. A Proclamation For his example, his friendship to the Today a senseless act of violence has United States, and his warm friendship to robbed the United States of a close friend me, I am eternally grateful. and robbed the world of a statesman and William J. Clinton courageous champion of peace. Yitzhak Rabin was a brave man who de- NOTE: The President inscribed this statement in fended his country for half a century and a condolence book at the Israeli Embassy. An original was not available for verification of the whose vision and tenacity brought the world content of this statement. closer to peace. He was a man of hope, a man of wisdom, a man who sought to improve the lives of Exchange With Reporters Aboard all those he touched. Air Force One The peace process that he began will be November 5, 1995 his legacy. The people of the United States and the peace-loving people of the world are Death of Prime Minister Rabin of Israel determined that the peace process will go Q. This is quite a President gathering, Mr. forward. President, your thoughts as the flight of As a mark of respect for the memory of thisÐÐ Yitzhak Rabin and America's support for President Clinton. We're all going to pay peace in the Middle East, I hereby order that our respects to Prime Minister Rabin. We the flag of the United States shall be flown all knew him. And we're going to express our at half-staff upon all public buildings and support for Israel and for the peace process. grounds, at all military posts and naval sta- Q. President Carter said the other day tions, and on all naval vessels of the Federal when he was being interviewed that he Government in the District of Columbia and thought, given the circumstances, there logi- throughout the United States and its Terri- cally enough would be a pause, not a pause tories and possessions until his interment. I in peacemaking but a reflective pause, and also direct that the flag shall be flown at half- then, of course, the process should gather staff for the same length of time at all United again. How quickly do you think the Israelis States Embassies, legations, consular offices, can pull themselves together? VerDate 27-FEB-98 10:53 Mar 18, 1998 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\TEMP\P45NO4.006 INET03 1988 Nov. 5 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1995 President Clinton. I don't have any idea. Then I willÐon the way back perhaps I'll We don't know yet. We are going to have have something more to say about it. But I meetings when we're there; we're going to think it would be inappropriateÐthis is a visit and then maybe we'll have some moreÐ time of national mourning for the people of some better thoughts for you then. Israel and a time when all of us who knew Q. Mr. President, collectively when you Prime Minister Rabin feel a great sense of look at the manifest of this trip, what message loss and an enormous sense of respect, even does it send to the Israelis, Middle East, and awe, for what he did and for the sacrifice the entire world for that matter? he paid. I'd like for us to take the time to President Clinton. Well, I think it should properly honor that, and then on the way send, first of all, the message that the United back perhaps something will emerge from States still stands as a genuine friend and a our meetings which will be useful for me to partner to the people of Israel, Republicans comment on. and Democrats alike. We have decades of Q. Will you be seeing Mr. Netanyahu, or dedication to the cause of peace here, from can you give us an idea of who you will see? the work President Carter did with the Camp Press Secretary Mike McCurry. We'll David accords to the work President Bush do that for all of you here. did in starting this process that has been con- President Clinton. Mike has that. summated in the last couple of years, the Q. President Carter, we haven't heard Secretaries of State that are here, the leaders from you. What are your thoughts about the of both parties in the CongressÐthe United message that should be sent by this delega- States is standing with Israel and standing tion that includes people who were in your for the cause of peace. And we're standing administrationÐyourself of course? strong and deep. President Carter. Well, I've known Prime Q. President Bush, what goes through Minister Rabin for 24 years and admired him your mind, sir, as you consider all the familiar personally and as a great leader. I'm honored faces on this trip and the message that it may to be invited by President Clinton to partici- be sending to the rest of the world? pate. I think it was a very wise thing on the President Bush. Well, of course, I'm very part of the President to put together this tre- grateful to President Clinton for personally mendously impressive delegation because in inviting me. Barbara and I felt close to Prime this time of sorrow and grief and uncertainty, Minister Rabin, as do the others here, very I think it is very important to every Israeli close to him. I remember when he visited to know the United States stands beside us us in our home up in Maine and all of that. with full support. And so I would simply leave the policy to I wasn't insinuating that the peace process President Clinton but simply say I'm sure it should be delayed, but the comment I made will be a very emotional event, and I hope was that the Israelis would have to make this that it conveys that the Republicans, Demo- decision, and for a few days at least we crats, whatever, are together in the support shouldn't be pushing them on an exact sched- of Israel and clearly in support of the peace ule for the peace process. process. And that's all I think we can expect But I think it's important, too, for the from this. Israelis to not only know that we are support- Q. The Syrian track seems awfully tough, ive of Israel but also supportive of the peace even before this. Various approaches have process. And our coming, I think, is closely been triedÐPresident Carter actually medi- related to that. ated 16 tough days. You've talked to us on So I hope that President Clinton's ideas it. Do you have some new tactic? I don't for this mission, burdened as we are with sad- know how many ways there are to go about ness and the personal loss, will be productive it, but have you thought of some way to break for Israel and for the peace process. this stalemate that might work? Q. People have said that one of the causes President Clinton. I think I should defer of this is the polarization that has occurred all substantive conversations about this until in Israel because of the peace process and after the funeral and after the meetings. the very vigorous opposition to it. Is there VerDate 27-FEB-98 10:53 Mar 18, 1998 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\TEMP\P45NO4.006 INET03 Administration of William J. Clinton, 1995 / Nov. 6 1989 any lesson for us in the United States with The American people mourn with you in what happened yesterday? the loss of your leader. And I mourn with President Clinton. Well, of course we've you, for he was my partner and friend. Every dealt with some polarization of our own. And moment we shared was a joy because he was I think the lesson is that in a free and vital a good man and an inspiration because he society, you want the widest range of free- was also a great man.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ihe White House Iashington
    HE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDE N T JIMMY CARTER LOCATION DATE (MO., Day, Yr.) IHE WHITE HOUSE MARCH 7, 1977 IASHINGTON, D. C. TIME DAY 6:30 a.m. MONDAY PHONE TIME = 0 E -u ACTIVITY 7 K 2II From To L p! 6:30 R The President received a wake up call from the White House signal board operator. 7:oo The President went to the Oval Office. 7:30 7:35 The President met with his Assistant for National Security Affairs,Zbigniew Brzezinski. 7:45 7:50 I I, The President met with his Assistant for Congressional Liaison, Frank Moore. 8:Ol The President went to the Cabinet Room. 8:Ol 10:05 The President participated in a Cabinet meeting For a list of attendees,see APPENDIX "A." 1O:05 The President returned to the Oval Office. 1O:25 The President went to the Diplomatic Reception Room. 1O:26 The President and the First Lady went to the South Grounds. 1O:26 1l:OO The President participated in an arrival ceremony in honor of the Prime Minister of Israel and Mrs. Yitzhak Rabin. Members of the press The President and the First Lady greeted Prime Minister and Mrs. Rabin. The Presidential party went to the platform. 10:35 10:45 The President and Prime Minister Rabin exchanged remarks. The President and the First Lady escorted Prime Minister and Mrs. Rabin to the Diplomatic Reception Room. The President and the First Lady met with members of the Official Israeli Party and the Welcoming Committee. For a list of attendees ,see APPENDIX& "B." 11:oo The President and Prime Minister Rabin went to the Oval Office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhak Rabin
    YITZHAK RABIN: CHRONICLE OF AN ASSASSINATION FORETOLD Last year, architect-turned-filmmaker Amos Gitaï directed Rabin, the Last EN Day, an investigation into the assassination, on November 4, 1995, of the / Israeli Prime Minister, after a demonstration for peace and against violence in Tel-Aviv. The assassination cast a cold and brutal light on a dark and terrifying world—a world that made murder possible, as it suddenly became apparent to a traumatised public. For the Cour d’honneur of the Palais des papes, using the memories of Leah Rabin, the Prime Minister’s widow, as a springboard, Amos GitaI has created a “fable” devoid of formality and carried by an exceptional cast. Seven voices brought together to create a recitative, “halfway between lament and lullaby,” to travel back through History and explore the incredible violence with which the nationalist forces fought the peace project, tearing Israel apart. Seven voices caught “like in an echo chamber,” between image-documents and excerpts from classic and contemporary literature— that bank of memory that has always informed the filmmaker’s understanding of the world. For us, who let the events of this historic story travel through our minds, reality appears as a juxtaposition of fragments carved into our collective memory. AMOS GITAI In 1973, when the Yom Kippur War breaks out, Amos Gitai is an architecture student. The helicopter that carries him and his unit of emergency medics is shot down by a missile, an episode he will allude to years later in Kippur (2000). After the war, he starts directing short films for the Israeli public television, which has now gone out of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Information
    STATISTICAL INFORMATION VOTES CAST FOR SENATORS IN 2008, 2010, and 2012 [Compiled from official statistics obtained by the Clerk of the House. Figures in the last column, for the 2012 election, may include totals for more candidates than the ones shown.] Vote Total vote State 2008 2010 2012 cast in 2012 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Alabama ....................... 752,391 1,305,383 515,619 968,181 .................... .................... .................... Alaska .......................... 1,51,767 147,814 60,045 90,839 .................... .................... .................... Arizona ........................ .................... .................... 592,011 1,005,615 1,036,542 1,104,457 2,243,422 Arkansas ...................... 804,678 .................... 288,156 451,618 .................... .................... .................... California ..................... .................... .................... 5,218,441 4,217,366 7,864,624 4,713,887 12,578,511 Colorado ...................... 1,230,994 990,755 851,590 822,731 .................... .................... .................... Connecticut .................. .................... .................... 605,204 498,341 792,983 604,569 1,511,764 Delaware ...................... 257,539 140,595 174,012 123,053 265,415 115,700 399,606 Florida .......................... .................... .................... 1,092,936 2,645,743 4,523,451 3,458,267 8,189,946 Georgia ........................ 909,923 1,228,033 996,516 1,489,904 ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Interest in Past Leaders Reflects the Crisis on the Israeli Left
    Interest in Past Leaders Reflects the Crisis on the Israeli Left by Prof. Hillel Frisch BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 875, June 26, 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The crisis of the Israeli left is reflected in the sharply declining interest within Israel in Yitzhak Rabin compared to Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. The opposite trend is visible abroad. The problem of the left is that it is Israelis who vote, not the world community. A search for the term “Yitzhak Rabin” in Hebrew in Google Trends reveals a sharp decline in interest since 2005, the tenth anniversary of Rabin’s assassination. The decline is precipitous in the years immediately following 2005 and then levels off. Still, the decline over time is substantial. If searches for Rabin in 2004 represent 100, the high point, this figure was down to 6 by October 2017 – less than one-twelfth the number of searches 13 years before. Interest in Rabin is also sharply correlated to the period of commemoration that occurs in November of each year on the anniversary of the assassination. Obviously, official remembrance days heighten awareness in any particular year, but they have done little to arrest the overall decline in interest in Rabin. “Yitzhak Rabin” in Google Trends The same exercise regarding Menachem Begin and Shamir shows a stark contrast. Whereas interest in Rabin has declined sharply, interest in Begin and Shamir remains surprisingly constant – not only over the years, but within the calendar year. These comparisons say nothing about the absolute number of searches over time among the three leaders. They do say something conclusive, however, about trends in interest and therefore in the collective historical memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Peace Prize - True Or False?
    Nobel Peace Prize - True or False? ___ 1 T he Nobel Peace Prize is ___ 7 The Nobel Peace Prize given every two years. ceremony is held each year in December. ___ 2 T he Nobel Peace Prize is n amed after a scientist. ___ 8 The Nobel Peace Prize winner is chosen by a ___ 3 A lfred Nobel was from c ommittee from Sweden. G ermany. ___ 9 T he prize can only be given ___ 4 N obel became very rich from t o one person each time. his invention – a new gasoline engine. ___ 10 T he Nobel Peace Prize consists of a medal, a ___ 5 There are six dierent Nobel diploma and some money. Prizes. ___ 6 The rst Peace Prize was awarded in 1946 . Nobel Peace Prize - True or False? ___F 1 T he Nobel Peace Prize is ___T 7 The Nobel Peace Prize given every two years. Every year ceremony is held each year in December. ___T 2 T he Nobel Peace Prize is n amed after a scientist. ___F 8 The Nobel Peace Prize winner is chosen by a Norway ___F 3 A lfred Nobel was from c ommittee from Sweden. G ermany. Sweden ___F 9 T he prize can only be given ___F 4 N obel became very rich from t o one person each time. Two or his invention – a new more gasoline engine. He got rich from ___T 10 T he Nobel Peace Prize dynamite T consists of a medal, a ___ 5 There are six dierent Nobel diploma and some money.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirette F. Mabrouk Mirette F
    Mirette F. Mabrouk Mirette F. Mabrouk is director of communications for the Economic Research Forum (ERF), and a nonresident fellow at the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. She was formerly associate director for publishing operations at the American University in Cairo (AUC) Press and the publisher of The Daily News Egypt, the country’s only independent English- language daily newspaper. Mabrouk has over 20 years of experience in journalism. She founded The Daily News Egypt (formerly The Daily Star Egypt) in May of 2005 and it rapidly became the leading English newspaper in the country. Mabrouk wrote regularly, with her opinion columns generally being the paper’s top-emailed article during the week of their publication. In 1995, she was asked to found Business Today, becoming the country’s youngest editor of a national magazine. It went on to become the top independent business magazine in the region. She was formerly an editor for Arab Media and Society, an online journal on the media’s role in Arab and Muslim societies published by AUC’s Kamal Adham Center for Journalism Training and Research, and the Middle East Centre at St. Anthony’s College, Oxford. She has served on the boards of the Egyptian Chapter of Young Arab Leaders, a regional non-profit organization dedicated to development, and the non-governmental organization Masr Habibti. She has been involved with the Aspen Institute (Washington DC), the Consumer Unity Trust Society (Jaipur, India.), and the Brains Trust at the Evian Group, a trade-advocacy think tank based in Lausanne, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Hawks Become Doves
    ONE INTRODUCTION An Individual Level Explanation of Foreign Policy Change Why do some hawkish leaders become dovish, thereby pursuing dramatic change in their states’ foreign policies, while other hawks remain committed to the status quo? Recent history provides us with important examples of prominent foreign policy “hawks” who underwent dovish transformations. These leaders’ shifts led, in turn, to major changes in their states’ foreign policies. Egyptian president Anwar Sadat’s peace overtures to Jerusalem, just four years after launching a surprise attack on Israel, led to the Egypt‑Israel Peace Treaty in 1979. In South Africa, Nelson Mandela’s repudiation of violence in his 1989 letter to President P. W. Botha set the stage for the country’s transition from apartheid to democracy. In the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev moved his country from a policy of containment to détente between 1985 and 1991. Yet major foreign policy transformations have occurred not only in authoritarian regimes, where change, some would argue, may more like‑ ly occur as a result of the whims of an authoritarian leader, but also in democratic societies.1 For example, Charles de Gaulle, the French military leader who became president of the Fifth Republic, reversed the longstand‑ ing French policy vis‑à‑vis the Algerians by granting them independence. The United States also has undergone a number of major foreign policy reversals. President Richard Nixon’s famous 1972 visit to China marked a significant turnaround of American‑Chinese relations. President Ronald Reagan began seeking a rapprochement with the Soviet Union even before 1 © 2014 State University of New York Press, Albany 2 WHY HAWKS BECOME DOVES Gorbachev came to power and, in so doing, effectively reversed his hardline stance toward the country to which he had formerly referred as “the evil empire” (Farnham 2001; Fischer 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Shimon Peres the Leadership Series
    Center for Israel Education Shimon Peres The Leadership Series 1. Childhood and Early Years “In Israel, a land lacking in natural resources, we learned to appreciate our greatest natonal advantage: our minds. Through creatvity and innovaton, we transformed barren deserts into fourishing felds and pioneered new fronters in science and technology.” -Shimon Peres Shimon Peres was born on August 2, 1923, in Wiszniew, Poland (now Vishnyeva, Belarus). His parents were Yitzhak and Sara Perski. Shimon’s family spoke Hebrew, Yiddish, and Russian at home. Shimon also learned Polish at school. His father was a wealthy Cover Photo Credit: Mark Neyman, Natonal Photo Collecton tmber merchant, and his mother was a librarian. Peres had a younger brother named Gershon. Leadership Series: Shimon Peres Copyright © 2019 by Center for Israel Educaton His grandfather, Rabbi Zvi Meltzer, impacted his All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or life greatly. Peres discussed his memories with his transmited in any form or by any means without writen permission from the author. grandfather: Published by Center for Israel Educaton, P.O. Box 15129, Atlanta, GA 30333. “As a child, I grew up in my grandfather's home. www.israeled.org … I was educated by him.… My grandfather [email protected] taught me Talmud.” In 1932, when Peres was 9 years old, his father immigrated to Tel Aviv, in the Land of Israel. In 1934, Shimon and his family followed their father. 1 www.israeled.org. ©Center for Israel Education, 2020 All Rights Reserved Peres at age 13 Kibbutz Geva (1944) Source: Wikimedia Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall, the Recognition of Israel, and Anti-Semitism by Gerald M. Pops
    1 MARSHALL, THE RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL, AND ANTI-SEMITISM By Gerald M. Pops1 George Catlett Marshall is revered throughout the world as the principal military leader of allied forces in World War II and as one of only two generals who were awarded the Nobel Peace prize.1 As Secretary of State, he was known as the father of the post-war Marshall Plan that played a crucial role in the reconstruction of Europe. Notwithstanding, he has been viewed ambivalently by Jewish Americans. This is because he opposed, as Secretary of State, the immediate unilateral recognition by the United States of the new state of Israel. The meaning ascribed to this act by Clark Clifford “with” Richard Holbrooke, in their 1991 book, Counsel to the President: A Memoir, together with a retrospective editorial in the Washington Post by Holbrooke seventeen years later, did much to shape the thinking of many American Jews respecting Marshall’s motivation for opposing the immediate recognition of the new Jewish state. They attributed Marshall’s opposition, in part, to anti-Semitic staff members within the Department of State. In the words of Holbrooke: Beneath the surface lay unspoken but real anti-Semitism on the 2 part of some (but not all) policymakers. 1 The author thanks the following people: Paul Barron and Mark Stoler, for help with the search for materials and ideas; Jeffrey Kozak, for assistance using Marshall Library sources; Brian Shaw and other members of the Marshall Foundation for encouragement to complete the project, and Marcia Pops and Hillary Bhaskaran for editing and stylistic advice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Normalization: Israel Studies in the Academy Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements F
    The Politics of Normalization: Israel Studies in the Academy Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Miriam Shenkar, M.A. Graduate Program in Education: Educational Policy and Leadership The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Robert F. Lawson, Advisor Matt Goldish Douglas Macbeth Copyright by Miriam Shenkar 2010 Abstract This study will examine the emergence of Israel studies at the university level. Historical precedents for departments of Hebrew language instruction, Jewish studies centers and area studies will be examined to determine where Israel studies chair holders are emerging. After defining Israel studies, a qualitative methodological approach will be used to evaluate the disciplinary focus of this emerging area. Curriculum available from and degree granting capabilities of various programs will be examined. In addition surveys taken of Israel studies scholars will provide their assessments of the development of the subject. Four case studies will highlight Israel studies as it is emerging in two public (land grant institutions) versus two private universities. An emphasis will be placed on why Israel studies might be located outside Middle Eastern studies. Questions regarding the placing of Israel studies within Jewish studies or Near Eastern Languages and Culture departments will be addressed. The placing of Israel studies chairs and centers involves questions of national and global identity. How these identities are conceptualized by scholars in the field, as well as how they are reflected in the space found for Israel studies scholars are the motivating factors for the case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads: the Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Haim Malka Foreword by Samuel W
    Malka Crossroads: The Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Haim Malka Foreword by Samuel W. Lewis The U.S.-Israel partnership is under unprecedented strain. The relationship is deep and coopera- tion remains robust, but the challenges to it now are more profound than ever. Growing differ- ences could undermine the national security of both the United States and Israel, making strong cooperation uncertain in an increasingly volatile and unpredictable Middle East. This volume explores the partnership between the United States and Israel and analyzes how political and strategic dynamics are reshaping the relationship. Drawing on original research and dozens of interviews with U.S. and Israeli officials and former officials, the study traces the development CROSSROADS of the U.S.-Israel relationship, analyzes the sources of current tension, and suggests ways for- ward for policymakers in both countries. The author weaves together historical accounts with current analysis and debates to provide insight into this important yet changing relationship. It is a sobering and keen analysis for anyone concerned with the future of the U.S.-Israel partner- ship and the broader Middle East. Haim Malka is deputy director and senior fellow of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. Crossroads The Future of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership HAIM MALKA ISBN 978-0-89206-660-5 FOREWORD BY SAMUEL W. LEWIS Center for Strategic and International Studies Washington, D.C. Ë|xHSKITCy066605zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS 2011 C ROSSROADS ABOUT CSIS At a time of new global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to decisionmakers in government, in- ternational institutions, the private sector, and civil society.
    [Show full text]