DOCSLIB.ORG

Health & Wellbeing Ward Profile Ashton Hurst

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Health & Wellbeing Ward Profile Ashton Hurst HEALTH & WELLBEING WARD PROFILE ASHTON HURST Population 11,503 ♂48.7% ♀51.3% Ashton Hurst Population (-4.1% Since 2001) Male Population 5,603 Female Population 5,900 (Tameside Population +2.9% Since 2001) (Tameside Male Population 49.1%) (Tameside Female Population 50.9%) Ashton Hurst is one of four wards making up the Market town of Ashton-Under-Lyne. The Population of Ashton Hurst decreased by 4.1% between the 2001 and 2011 censuses. The population of Ashton Hurst has a similar age profile to the Tameside population as a whole. A lower proportion of people in Ashton Hurst are classified as White British compared to Tameside as a whole, with a higher proportion of people of Indian and Pakistani ethnic backgrounds. Employment 55.8% 2.7% 14.2% Employment Rate Job Seekers Allowance Claimant Rate Out of Work Benefit Claimants (Tameside Average=13.6%) 3rd Lowest in Tameside (Tameside Average=2.8%) Ashton Hurst has one of the lowest employment rates out of all wards in Economic Status (% Aged 16-74) Tameside, although the rate of unemployment is not reflective of this. The Ashton Ashton Tameside England Hurst lower employment rate in Ashton Hurst can be accounted for by a higher Hurst (%) (%) (%) rate of economic inactivity within the ward. This higher rate of economic (Number) inactivity within Ashton Hurst is accounted for by a higher proportion of re- Economically Active 5343 63.4 68.8 69.9 tired people within the ward Employee Full Time) 2956 35.1 40.6 38.6 Employee (Part Time) 1151 13.7 13.2 13.7 The rate of out of work benefit claimants in Ashton Hurst is slightly higher than the Tameside average, which can be accounted for by a higher than Self-Employed 597 7.1 7.4 9.7 average rate of ESA and lone parent claimants, with a job seekers allow- Unemployed 436 5.2 5.0 4.4 ance claimant rate that is marginally lower than the Tameside average. Full Time Student 203 2.4 2.5 3.4 Economically Inactive 3089 36.6 31.2 30.1 Job Seekers Allowance Claimants by Ward (% Aged 16-64) Out of Work Benefit Claimants (% Aged 16-64) Ashton Ashton Tameside England Hurst Hurst (%) (%) (%) (Number) Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) 200 2.7 2.8 2.8 Employment Support Allowance (ESA) 670 9.1 8.8 8 Lone Parents (claiming Income Support) 155 2.1 1.6 1.4 Other 25 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total out of work benefit claimants 1050 14.2 13.6 12.6 Education and Training 28.8% 64.6% 53.7% Residents Aged 16+ without Early Years Foundation Stage: Pupils Achieving 5 GCSEs any Qualifications 5 Year Olds with a Good Level Including English and Maths at (Tameside Average=28.1%) of Development Grades A*-C (Tameside Average=59.9%) (Tameside Average=56.5%) The proportion of the Ashton Hurst population with no qualifications is slightly higher than the Tameside average. Achievement of 5 GCSEs grades A* to C including English and Maths is below the Tameside average. The proportion of 5 year olds achieving a good level of development in the Early Years Foundation Stage in Ashton Hurst is higher than the Tameside average. Highest Achieved Qualification (% Aged 16+) Ashton Tameside England (%) Hurst (%) (%) No Qualifications 28.8 28.1 22.5 Level 1: 1-4 GCSEs or Equivalent 15.3 16.1 13.3 Level 2: 5+ GCSEs or Equivalent 17.3 17.3 15.2 Level 3: 2+ A-Levels or Equivalent 10.9 12.1 12.4 Level 4 and above: Degree Level 18.4 17.5 27.4 Apprenticeship 4.1 3.6 3.6 Other Qualifications 5.3 5.7 5.7 Housing 4,769 14.4% 1.7% Number of Households Fuel Poor Households Households without Central Heating (Tameside Average=14.1%) (Tameside Average=2.8%) Most housing in Ashton Hurst is semi-detached or detached with a low- Housing Type (% Households) er proportion of Terraced housing and apartments than Tameside and England averages. Almost two thirds of homes in Ashton Hurst are Ashton Tameside England Hurst (%) (%) (%) owner occupied with approximately a quarter of homes social rented. House: Detached 21.1 11.3 22.3 The modelled rate of fuel poor households in Ashton Hurst is marginally 53.1 37.5 30.7 higher than the Tameside average at 14.4%. House: Semi-Detached House: Terraced 16.0 35.7 24.5 Flat/ Apartment: Purpose Built Block 8.9 13.4 16.7 Flat/ Apartment: Converted House 0.6 1.2 4.3 Housing Tenure (% Households) Flat/ Apartment: In Commercial Building 0.3 0.9 1.1 Ashton Tameside England Caravan or other Mobile/ Temporary Structure 0 <0.1 0.4 Hurst (%) (%) (%) Owner Occupied 64.5 63.8 63.3 Modelled Percentage of Households in Fuel Poverty Private Rented 9.0 13.2 16.8 Social Rented 25.4 21.5 17.7 Shared Ownership (part owned and part rented) 0.2 0.3 0.8 Living Rent Free 0.9 1.1 1.3 Household Overcrowding (% Households) Ashton Tameside England Hurst (%) (%) (%) Room Overcrowding 5.9 6.1 8.7 Bedroom Overcrowding 4.5 3.9 4.6 Health 7.7% 21.6% 89.2 per 100,000 u75 population Poor Health (Self-Reported) Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability Under-75 CVD Mortality Rate (DSR) 5th Highest in Tameside, average 7.3%) (Tameside Average =20.9%) (2nd Lowest in Tameside, average = 86.4) Residents of Ashton Hurst have a slightly higher level of limiting long term illness or disability compared to the Tameside average. Male life ex- pectancy within the ward is higher than the Tameside average, whereas Female life expectancy is slightly lower than the Tameside average. Ashton Hurst has a high prevalence of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Diabetes, Asthma, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Peripheral Arte- rial Disease (PAD) compared to the Tameside average. QOF Prevalence Rates 2013/14 Chronic Peripheral Atrial Diabetes Kidney Arterial CHD Stroke/ TIA Hypertension COPD Asthma Cancer Heart Failure Dementia Fibrillation (17+) Disease Disease (AF) (CKD) (18+) (PAD) Ashton Hurst 4.9% 2.2% 16.5% 6.4% 3.0% 6.7% 1.7% 0.7% 0.7% 3.5% 1.3% 1.3% Tameside 4.7% 2.2% 16.9% 6.1% 3.0% 6.4% 1.9% 0.7% 0.6% 3.1% 1.4% 1.0% England 3.3% 1.7% 13.7% 6.2% 1.8% 5.9% 2.1% 0.7% 0.6% 4.0% 1.6% 0.6% Males Females Percentage Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability Tameside Average ♂ ♀ 30 25 Life Expectancy Life Expectancy 20 77.3 79.6 6th Highest in Tameside 5th Lowest in Tameside 15 Tameside Average=76.1 Tameside Average=80.3 10 Under 75 All-Cause Under 75 All-Cause 5 Mortality Rate Mortality Rate Limiting % Term Illness Long or Disability 0 475.1 293.7 (per 100,000 u75 Population) (per 100,000 u75 Population) 4th Lowest in Tameside 3rd Lowest in Tameside Tameside Average=560.6 Tameside Average=358.9 Distribution of Acorn Wellbeing Groups in Ashton Hurst The profile of Acorn Wellbeing groups in Ashton Hurst are detailed in the map (left) and chart (bottom left) :- The highest represented Wellbeing Acorn Group in Ashton Hurst at 30.4% of the population is the ‘At Risk’ group. Areas represented by the ‘At Risk’ group generally do not have a high incidence of illness, but multiple unhealthy lifestyle behaviours such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption and poor diets putting the population at risk of future health problems. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviours within the ‘At Risk’ group are compounded by social issues such as unemployment and debt, which can lead to low mental wellbeing. The ‘Caution’ group represents 29% of the Ashton Hurst population. These are areas where the health and wellbeing of the population is generally good with a below average incidence of illness. However, the population within the ’Caution’ group do exhibit some unhealthy behaviours that may lead to ill- health. Within the ‘caution’ group there are lower levels of smoking, with a lower prevalence of high blood pressure, but a higher prevalence of obesity and high cholesterol. The ‘Health Challenges’ group makes up 22% of the Ashton Hurst population. These are areas with the highest levels of illness and risky behaviours now and within the past that lead to health challenges. They are typically some of the most deprived neighbourhoods and those with the highest elderly populations. This group has the highest prevalence of smoking and lowest consumption of fruit and vegetables. There may also be issues with social isolation and mental wellbeing within the ‘Health Challenges’ group. The ‘Healthy’ group makes up 18.6% of the Ashton Hurst population. This group represents a higher proportion for the Ashton Hurst Population than that of Tameside as a whole. These are areas with very low levels of illness and good lifestyle behaviours. These areas are typically more affluent, often with a high proportion of older residents. Levels of smoking are very low and consumption of fruit and vegetables are high. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Map of the Hurst Ward, illustrating where the 4 main Acorn wellbeing groups are geographically placed Acorn Wellbeing Profile of the Ashton Hurst Population The profile of Acorn Wellbeing types in Ashton Hurst are detailed in the table and charts opposite. There are four Acorn Wellbeing types that make up ap- proximately 50% of the Ashton Hurst population:- The highest represented Wellbeing Acorn Type in Ashton Hurst at 16.5% of the population is ‘Struggling Smokers’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck
    COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck, Alam, Billington, Bowden, Bowerman, Boyle, Bray, Cartey, Chadwick, Choksi, Cooney, Cooper, Costello, Dickinson, Drennan, Fairfoull, Feeley, J Fitzpatrick, P Fitzpatrick, Glover, Gosling Gwynne, A Holland, B Holland, J Homer, S Homer, Huntbach, Jackson, Jones, Lane, Lewis, McNally, Martin, Mills, Naylor, Newton, North, Owen, Patel, Patrick, Pearce, Quinn, Reid, Ricci, Robinson, Ryan, N Sharif, T Sharif, M Smith, T Smith, Sweeton, Taylor, Ward, Warrington, R Welsh and Wills 1 ELECTION OF CIVIC MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Owen, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Janet Cooper, be and is hereby elected Civic Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 2 ELECTION OF DEPUTY MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Choksi, seconded by Councillor Lewis and RESOLVED That Councillor Glover be and is hereby appointed Deputy Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 3. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR OF COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councillor Warrington, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2021/22. 4. DECLARATION OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 5. COUNCIL MINUTES Consideration was given to the minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021 be signed by the Chair of Council Business as a correct record. 6. ELECTION OF COUNCILLORS A report of the Returning Officer was received detailing the persons elected to the office of Councillor for the Wards of the Borough For details see Appendix A to the minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area
    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10
    Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester
    Chapter 1 Greater Manchester 1.1 Bolton Left = Left List You = You Party Astley Bridge Farnworth Hilary Fairclough C 2,358 Jim Lord Lab 1,151 Clive Atty LD 733 Tariq Aziz LD 955 Muhammad Rafiq Lab 572 Michelle Ionn C 531 Andy Allen You 138 Bradshaw Great Lever [Lab gain from C] Walter Hall C 2,535 Mohammed Iqbal Lab 1,657 James Cottam Lab 620 Mudasir Dean C 1,299 Lauren Alergant LD 342 Alan Johnson Grn 374 Anne Mumberson Grn 195 Mian Akhtar LD 245 Halliwell Breightmet Cliff Morris Lab 1,875 Arthur Norris C 1,696 Shahid Mahmood C 632 William Gallagher Lab 1,182 Riaz Gul LD 494 Carl Hemmings BNP 350 Stephen Howarth LD 163 Harper Green Norma Armston You 137 Lynne Hyland Grn 74 Champak Mistry Lab 1,181 Bill Dawson C 1,071 David Connor LD 390 Bromley Cross Heaton and Lostock Alan Wilkinson C 2,933 Jeremy Foster Lab 705 Alan Rushton C 3,378 David Wibberley LD 331 John Gillatt Lab 831 Liz Spencer Grn 147 Jonathan Evans LD 326 Andy Openshaw You 141 Daniel Mann Grn 249 Horwich and Blackrod [C gain Crompton [Lab gain from LD] from LD] Hanif Darvesh Lab 1,985 Pat Barrow C 1,469 John Partington C 1,113 Kevan Jones Lab 1,021 Yakub Khoda LD 873 Ian Hamilton LD 869 4 1.2. BURY 5 Consolidated Results — Bolton Conservative . 29,254 41.8% 9 councillors Labour . 22,644 32.4% 7 councillors Liberal Democrat . 14,221 20.3% 4 councillors Green Party .
    [Show full text]
  • Key Decision Notice
    ITEM NO: 7 Report To: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND CAPITAL MONITORING PANEL Date: 9 September 2013 Executive Member/ Councillor Gerald P Cooney – Executive Member, Learning Skills and Economic Growth Reporting Officer: Elaine Todd – Assistant Executive Director for Asset Management and Investment Partnership. Subject: EDUCATION CAPITAL PROGRAMME - UPDATE AND TARGETED BASIC NEED BID OUTCOME Report Summary: This report is intended to advise members of outcome of the Targeted Basic Need bid submissions and the implications arising from the successful applications and in addition general updates in respect of Education Capital expenditure. Recommendations: That members of the Strategic Capital Panel the contents of the report and approve in principle the allocation of: £1,677,925 Targeted Capital Funding to Extend Samuel Laycock School plus £75,000 project management fees; £150,000 Targeted Capital Funding project management fees to progress the design and construction of the new Ashton Primary School; £150,000 Targeted Capital project management fees to progress the new Hattersley, Hyde primary school; Temporary allocations from the capital programme to pay for the demolition of the former high school buildings, pending the realisation of capital receipts from the disposal of these sites; £41,224,58 additional Education capital funding to deliver the schemes in Table 4 and £2,284,633.36 Education capital funding to deliver the schemes in Table 5. The proposals contained in this report will support the delivery of Links to Community Strategy: the community strategy. Policy Implications: In line with current policy. Financial Implications: The Department for Education has allocated a total of £8.302 million capital grant for the three projects to extend Samuel (Authorised by the Borough Laycock School and establish a new primary school in both Treasurer) Ashton under Lyne and Hattersley, Hyde, plus a total of £375,000 for the project management of the capital projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside Report to The Electoral Commission August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 349 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 33 Appendices A Final recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 35 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 37 C First draft of electoral change Order for Tameside 39 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw: Area Profile
    A profile of needs and services about children, young people and their families In the Ashton area of Tameside December 2007 1 Ashton: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Ashton area – one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and families will be delivered. The other areas are Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield; Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale and Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive; rather, key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between different localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data whilst Part 2 focuses on services. 2 Contents Ashton: Profile of need and services ...............................................................2 Introduction ...................................................................................................2 Contents........................................................................................................3 Part 1: Basic need data................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections Handbook 2004 Complete
    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2004 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2004 The 2004 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with Galina Borisyuk, Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole & Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2004 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 0 948858 37 0 Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................v Introduction ................................................................................................................. vii Using the Handbook ................................................................................................ xxiii Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities ..................................................................... 1 London Assembly ...................................................................................................... 11 Metropolitan Borough Election Results ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting of the Council
    ITEM NO: 2 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 19 May 2015 Commenced: 5.00pm Adjourned: 6.00 pm Re-commenced: 7.00pm Terminated: 7.55pm Present: Councillor D Lane (Civic Mayor) Councillors Affleck, Bailey, Ballagher, Beeley, Bell, Bowden, Bowerman, Bray, P Buckley, Cartey, Cooney, Dickinson, Downs, Drennan, Fairfoull, J Fitzpatrick, P Fitzpatrick, Fowler, Francis, Glover, Gwynne, A Holland, Jackson, Kinsey, Kitchen, J Lane, McNally, I Miah, R Miah, Middleton, Patrick, Pearce, Peet, Piddington, K Quinn, S. Quinn, Reynolds, Ricci, Robinson, Ryan, Shember-Critchley, Sidebottom, M Smith, T Smith, Taylor, F Travis, L Travis, Ward, Warrington, Welsh, White, Whitehead, and Wild. Apologies for Absence: Councillors Cooper, B Holland and Sweeton. 1. ELECTION OF CIVIC MAYOR RESOLVED That this item be deferred until 7.00pm for the ceremonial part of this meeting. 2. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR OF COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councillor K Quinn and seconded by Councillor Taylor that Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2015/16. RESOLVED That Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2015/16. 3. CIVIC MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS The Civic Mayor extended a warm welcome to newly elected Members and congratulations to those Members who were re-elected at the Local Elections on 7 May 2015 and also to the borough’s three Members of Parliament on their election success, in particular, Angela Rayner MP who had become Tameside’s first female Member of Parliament. The Civic Mayor further extended congratulations to Councillor Claire Reynolds and her husband Jonathan Reynolds, MP, on the birth of their baby son.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections Handbook 2000 Complete
    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2000 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2000 The 2000 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with the assistance of Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole and Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2000 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permis- sion of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 0 948858 29 X Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................v Using the Digest ......................................................................................................... xvi Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities..................................................................... 1 London Assembly Election Results ............................................................................... 9 Metropolitan Borough Council Election Results .......................................................... 23 English Unitary Council Election Results .................................................................... 53 English
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2007
    Local Election Results May 2007 Andrew Teale August 12, 2017 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2007-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 12th August 2017: Correction to Market ward, Cambridge (thanks to Colin Rosentiel). 1st August 2015: Gain information added for Walsall. 14th April 2015: The seat won by Gwenda Thomas in the Welsh Assembly was Neath, not Gower. 1st April 2015: Blandford Old Town ward, North Dorset was LD gain from C. 22nd March 2015: Chadsmead ward, Lichfield was 1 LD gain from Lab, not 1 LD gain from C. 15th March 2015: Dorchester East ward, West Dorset was 2 LD holds; Dor- chester North ward, West Dorset was 1 LD gain from Ind. 13th March 2015: Winstanley ward, Blaby was 1 C gain from Lab; Calverton ward, Gedling was 2 Calverton First Independents gain from Lab.. 1st March 2015: Consolidated results for Taunton Deane corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. 220. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB,KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Wheatley CBE To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF TAMESIDE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrange- ments for the metropolitan borough of Tameside in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Tameside Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned arid the headquarters of the main.political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3. Tameside Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]