Megan Nurse BA, Pgdip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Finance Pam Williams BSc Econ(Hons) CPFA MCMI By e-mail: Council Offices, Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne, Tameside. OL6 6DL [email protected] Call Centre 0161-342-8355 Fax 0161-342- 3889 www.tameside.gov.uk email: [email protected] Doc Ref FOI 1619 Ask for Louise Shaw Direct Line 0161 342 2025 Date 9 May 2013 Dear Mr Tumulty Freedom of Information – Request for Information Unique Reference: FOI 1619 Thank you for your request for information dated 15 April 2013, which the Council received by email. You have requested the following information: 1) Could you please tell me how many homes in Tameside are subject to 'bedroom tax' 2) Also could you please detail, which wards / constituency how many homes are effected I.E. Denton x 700 Waterloo x 100 3) Also how many one bedroom properties are available and ready to move people into, in Tameside and if non what would the waiting list, be for someone seeking this criteria? In response to your request I can advise as follows: 1) 2778 properties in Tameside. 2) The table below details the number of properties in each ward. Ward Ashton Hurst 213 Ashton St Michael's 114 Ashton Waterloo 137 Audenshaw 62 Denton North East 69 Denton South 306 Denton West 23 Droylsden East 87 Droylsden West 71 Dukinfield 154 Dukinfield-Stalybridge 108 Hyde Godley 213 Hyde Newton 193 Hyde Werneth 35 Longdendale 232 Mossley 88 Stalybridge North 231 Stalybridge South 131 St Peter's 311 Total 2778 1) Tameside Council does not hold any housing stock. If you have any queries about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. If you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your request and wish to make a complaint, or request a review of the Council's decision, please write to Sandra J Stewart, Borough Solicitor, at Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, Wellington Road, Ashton-under- Lyne, Tameside OL6 6DL If you are not content with the outcome your complaint, you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. The Commissioner cannot normally make a decision unless you have exhausted the complaints procedure provided by the Council. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF and at www.ico.gov.uk. Yours sincerely Ilys Cookson Assistant Executive Director .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
[Show full text]
Nomination Paper Pack for By-Election of Hyde Newton on 5Th
Nomination Paper Office Use Only No of Nomination Paper Time delivered Date delivered Initials Tameside Metropolitan Borough in order of delivery ELECTION OF A BOROUGH COUNCILLOR for Hyde Newton Date of Election: Thursday 5 February 2009 We the undersigned, being local government electors for the said Ward , do hereby nominate the under-mentioned person as a candidate at the said election. PLEASE COMPLETE IN CAPITALS (except where a signature is required) Candidate’s Other forename(s) Commonly used Commonly used Home Address surname forenames Description (if any) use no more than 6 words surname in full (if any) (if any) in full Title Email Address Telephone Electoral Number Signature Print Name as Signed Polling District Number Letters Proposer Seconder We the undersigned, being local government electors for the said Ward, do hereby assent to the foregoing nomination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Notes 1. The attention of candidates and electors is drawn to the rules for filling up nomination papers and provisions relating to nomination papers contained the election rules in Schedule 2 to the Local Election (Principle Areas) Rules 2006. 2. Where a candidate is commonly known by some title they may be described by their title as if it were their surname. 3. Where a candidate commonly uses a name which is different from any other name they have, the commonly used name may also appear on the nomination paper, but if it does so, the commonly used name (instead of any other name) will appear on the ballot paper. 4. But the ballot paper will show the other name if the Returning Officer thinks that the use of the commonly used name may (a) be likely to mislead or confuse electors, or (b) that the commonly used name is obscene or offensive.
[Show full text]
Area Profile
A PROFILE OF NEEDS AND SERVICES ABOUT CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE & THEIR FAMILIES IN THE DUKINFIELD, STALYBRIDGE & MOSSLEY AREAS OF TAMESIDE SEPTEMBER 2007 CONTENTS Page No Dukinfield,Stalybridge & Mossley: Profile of need and services Introduction 2 Contents 3 Part 1: Basic need data 6 Population 6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 7 Ward Profiles 9 Dukinfield profile 9 1: Population data 9 2:Household Composition 9 3:Housing 10 4:Health 10 5:Unemployment 11 6:Education 11 7:Occupation 12 Dukinfield/Stalybridge profile 13 1: Population data 13 2:Household Composition 13 3:Housing 14 4:Health 14 5:Unemployment 14 6:Education 15 7:Occupation 16 Stalybridge North Profile 16 1:Population data 16 2:Household Composition 17 3:Housing 17 4:Health 18 5:Unemployment 18 6:Education 19 7:Occupation 19 Stalybridge South profile 20 1:Population data 20 2:Household Composition 21 3:Housing 21 4:Health 22 5:Unemployment 22 6.Education 23 7:Occupation 24 Mossley profile 24 1:Population data 24 2:Household Composition 25 3:Housing 25 4:Health 26 5:Unmployment 26 6:Education 27 7:Occupation 27 Selected Comparison Tables 28 Teenage Pregnancy Trend 29 Regeneration Profile 30 Part 2: Service Profile 33 Introduction 33 Section 1: Universal Offices 33 School and childcare data 33 1:Nursery Education and childcare 33 2:Primary Schools 34 3:Secondary Schools 34 4:Children’s Centres 35 5:Extended School Services 36 6: Childcare provision:summary 36 A. Childminders 37 B. Day Nurseries 37 C. Playgroups/Preschools 37 D. Out of School Clubs 38 Section 2: Additional services
[Show full text]
Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire
Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire Andrew Teale December 4, 2011 Abstract This submission disagrees with and presents a counter-proposal to the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals for new parliamentary con- stituency boundaries in Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The counter- proposal allocates seven whole constituencies to the boroughs of Stockport, Tameside and Oldham, nine whole constituencies to the boroughs of Man- chester, Salford and Trafford, and twenty-four whole constituencies to the rest of the region. No comment is made on the Boundary Commission’s proposals for the rest of the North West region or for any other region. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 The statutory criteria.........................2 1.2 Splitting of wards...........................3 2 Theoretical entitlements4 3 Southern Greater Manchester5 3.1 Manchester, Salford and Trafford..................5 3.2 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside.................. 10 4 Lancashire and Northern Greater Manchester 14 4.1 Crossing the boundary between Greater Manchester and Lancashire 16 4.2 Rochdale................................ 17 4.3 Bolton, Bury, Wigan and Rossendale................ 18 4.4 South Lancashire........................... 22 4.5 East Lancashire............................ 23 4.6 North Lancashire........................... 24 4.7 Summary................................ 25 5 Closing remarks 28 1 1 Introduction This document is my submission to the 2013 Review of Parliamentary constit- uency boundaries. I should ﬁrst introduce myself. I am the editor and webmaster of the Lo- cal Elections Archive Project (http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/), the in- ternet’s largest freely available collection of British local election results. I have been for some years a contributor to election-related web forums, and this submission is based on material originally posted on the Vote UK forum (http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/) and in some cases modiﬁed in the light of comments made.
[Show full text]
Tameside Locality Assessments GMSF 2020
November 2020 Transport Locality Assessments Introductory Note and Assessments – Tameside allocations GMSF 2020 Table of contents 1. Background 2 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 2 1.2 Policy Context – The National Planning Policy Framework 3 1.3 Policy Context – Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5 1.4 Structure of this Note 9 2. Site Selection 10 2.1 The Process 10 2.2 Greater Manchester Accessibility Levels 13 3. Approach to Strategic Modelling 15 4. Approach to Technical Analysis 17 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Approach to identifying Public Transport schemes 18 4.3 Mitigations and Scheme Development 19 5. Conclusion 23 6. GMSF Allocations List 24 Appendix A - GMA38 Ashton Moss West Locality Assessment A1 Appendix B - GMA39 Godley Green Garden Village Locality Assessment B1 Appendix C - GMA40 Land South of Hyde Locality Assessment C1 1 1. Background 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 1.1.1 The GMSF is a joint plan of all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, providing a spatial interpretation of the Greater Manchester Strategy which will set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2037. It will: ⚫ identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 Local Authorities, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; ⚫ ensure we have an appropriate supply of land to meet this need; ⚫ protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; ⚫ allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; ⚫ support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; ⚫ define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester.
[Show full text]
Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation
Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation Submission of the Labour Party Page 1 of 50 1) General Points a) Submission This submission is made on behalf of the Labour Party and the nine regional Labour parties within England. The submission represents the Labour’s Party’s response to the representations made to the Commission, both orally at the public hearings and in writing during the Initial Consultation Period and published by the Commission on 6 March 2012. The Labour Party made a detailed formal submission of its own which included a number of counter proposals. We have now considered the options further in each region, including those counter proposals submitted by others. We will refer to them in this response. While we are not formally amending our submission we will indicate those points and proposals with which we agree, and those with which we disagree. b) Factors to be considered In assessing the merits of different proposals we will as far as possible be guided by the stipulations of Clause 5 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 which lays down the rules by which the Commission shall conduct the review. Under the terms of the Act1, the Commission may, in choosing between different schemes, take into account i) Special Geographical Circumstances, including the size shape and accessibility of a constituency ii) Local government boundaries iii) The boundaries of existing constituencies iv) Any local ties that would be broken by changes to constituencies 1 Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, Schedule 2 Clause 5 (1).
[Show full text]
COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck
COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck, Alam, Billington, Bowden, Bowerman, Boyle, Bray, Cartey, Chadwick, Choksi, Cooney, Cooper, Costello, Dickinson, Drennan, Fairfoull, Feeley, J Fitzpatrick, P Fitzpatrick, Glover, Gosling Gwynne, A Holland, B Holland, J Homer, S Homer, Huntbach, Jackson, Jones, Lane, Lewis, McNally, Martin, Mills, Naylor, Newton, North, Owen, Patel, Patrick, Pearce, Quinn, Reid, Ricci, Robinson, Ryan, N Sharif, T Sharif, M Smith, T Smith, Sweeton, Taylor, Ward, Warrington, R Welsh and Wills 1 ELECTION OF CIVIC MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Owen, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Janet Cooper, be and is hereby elected Civic Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 2 ELECTION OF DEPUTY MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Choksi, seconded by Councillor Lewis and RESOLVED That Councillor Glover be and is hereby appointed Deputy Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 3. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR OF COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councillor Warrington, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2021/22. 4. DECLARATION OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 5. COUNCIL MINUTES Consideration was given to the minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021 be signed by the Chair of Council Business as a correct record. 6. ELECTION OF COUNCILLORS A report of the Returning Officer was received detailing the persons elected to the office of Councillor for the Wards of the Borough For details see Appendix A to the minutes.
[Show full text]
Area Profile
A profile of needs and s Services about children, young people and their families In the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area of Tameside September 2007 Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area, this is one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and their families will be delivered. The other areas are Ashton-under-Lyne: Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw and Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive, rather key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid the planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data, whilst Part 2 focuses on services. The top three categories of the new occupational classification are ‘Managers & Senior Officials; Professionals’ and Associate Professional & Technical’ (hatched at the top of the graph on right) Tameside as a whole comes 350 th out of 376 in the country for Professional; and bottom in Greater Manchester for all three categories
[Show full text]
Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area
Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements
[Show full text]
Elections 2008:Layout 1.Qxd
ELECTIONS REPORT Thursday 1 May 2008 PREPARED BY CST 020 8457 9999 www.thecst.org.uk Copyright © 2008 Community Security Trust Registered charity number 1042391 Executive Summary • Elections were held on 1st May 2008 for the • The other far right parties that stood in the Mayor of London and the London Assembly, elections are small and were mostly ineffective, 152 local authorities in England and all local although the National Front polled almost councils in Wales 35,000 votes across five London Assembly constituencies • The British National Party (BNP) won a seat on the London Assembly for the first time, polling • Respect – The Unity Coalition divided into two over 130,000 votes. The seat will be taken by new parties shortly before the elections: Richard Barnbrook, a BNP councillor in Barking Respect (George Galloway) and Left List & Dagenham. Barnbrook also stood for mayor, winning almost 200,000 first and second • Respect (George Galloway) stood in part of the preference votes London elections, polling well in East London but poorly elsewhere in the capital. They stood • The BNP stood 611 candidates in council nine candidates in council elections outside elections around England and Wales, winning London, winning one seat in Birmingham 13 seats but losing three that they were defending. This net gain of ten seats leaves • Left List, which is essentially the Socialist them holding 55 council seats, not including Workers Party (SWP) component of the old parish, town or community councils. These Respect party, stood in all parts of the
[Show full text]
North Neighbourhood Strategic Forum Employment Initiatives
North Neighbourhood Strategic Forum Employment Initiatives David Berry Head of Employment and Skills 1 Tameside Residents • 140,000 of 224,100 (62%) residents are aged 16-64 (working aged) v 63% in UK • 105,200 (72.6%) residents are currently in employment v UK 75% • 11,500 (8.2%) residents receive Employment Support Allowance benefit due to health condition – 50% have main condition of mental or behavioural disorders, 14% musculoskeletal • 13,300 (18%) workless households v UK 14.5% – The percentage of children who are in households that are workless is 19% v UK 10.7% • 15,100 (10.9%) retain no qualifications v GB 7% – 95,600 (69.1%) retain a Level 2 qualification v GB 74.7% – 36,200 (26.2%) retain a Level 4 qualification and above v GB 38% • 1,420 (1.0%) disabled people are claiming benefits v GB 0.8% 2 Positive Steps Careers advice commissioned by Tameside Council • Targeted at young people aged 13 to 18 (in some cases 25) to help them move into education, employment and training • As of January 2019, we have 143 NEET young people • Participation is at 95.1% which is above target and an improvement in performance from last year. 31 (21%) come from Tameside North • 11 (7%) come from St Peters • 6 (4%) come from Ashton Hurst • 9 (6%) come from Ashton Waterloo • 5 (3%) come from Ashton St Michaels 3 Careers and Apprenticeship Exhibition • Location of events in recent years: Stalybridge Civic and Hyde Town Hall • 1,121 students attended in 2018 • Feedback rate of above 90% of pupils who ‘found the event useful’ • 17 schools took part in the Exhibition • 3 (17%) schools from Tameside North took part (St.
[Show full text]
Notice of Poll
NOTICE OF POLL Tameside Metropolitan Borough Election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East will be held on Thursday 8 March 2018, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Borough Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors BOYLE 29 Hiltons Farm Close, Labour Party Michael J Smith (+) Teresa A Smith (++) Laura Audenshaw, M34 5JP David J Mills Patricia Larkin Jane S Goodier David H Mitchell James Middleton Geoffrey Howarth Patrick Quinn Stuart Pearson OFFERMAN 23 Shire Croft, Mossley, Liberal Democrats Stephen Lightfoot (+) Claus Barthel (++) Shaun OL5 OAR Valerie Barthel John White Leslie Barlow Carol Oakes Andrew Downs Danielle Moore Lesley Betton Christine Drysdale STEVENSON 10 Saxon Street, The Conservative Party Hazel Stevenson (+) David Stevenson (++) Matt Droylsden, M43 7FR Candidate Joan Smith William R Smith Jennie L Davies Mark A Coyle Michael Sharp Carole Sharp Paul S Davies Steven Lewis TRAIN 34 Parvet Avenue, Green Party Barbara Ganson (+) Mark Jackson (++) Annie Droylsden, Manchester, Anthony J Torkington Gillian A Ingham M43 7SB Richard Ingham Maureen Street Gary Ward Elizabeth Ingham Peter Rothwell James F Brown
[Show full text]