DOCSLIB.ORG

Area Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A PROFILE OF NEEDS AND SERVICES ABOUT CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE & THEIR FAMILIES IN THE DUKINFIELD, STALYBRIDGE & MOSSLEY AREAS OF TAMESIDE SEPTEMBER 2007 CONTENTS Page No Dukinfield,Stalybridge & Mossley: Profile of need and services Introduction 2 Contents 3 Part 1: Basic need data 6 Population 6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 7 Ward Profiles 9 Dukinfield profile 9 1: Population data 9 2:Household Composition 9 3:Housing 10 4:Health 10 5:Unemployment 11 6:Education 11 7:Occupation 12 Dukinfield/Stalybridge profile 13 1: Population data 13 2:Household Composition 13 3:Housing 14 4:Health 14 5:Unemployment 14 6:Education 15 7:Occupation 16 Stalybridge North Profile 16 1:Population data 16 2:Household Composition 17 3:Housing 17 4:Health 18 5:Unemployment 18 6:Education 19 7:Occupation 19 Stalybridge South profile 20 1:Population data 20 2:Household Composition 21 3:Housing 21 4:Health 22 5:Unemployment 22 6.Education 23 7:Occupation 24 Mossley profile 24 1:Population data 24 2:Household Composition 25 3:Housing 25 4:Health 26 5:Unmployment 26 6:Education 27 7:Occupation 27 Selected Comparison Tables 28 Teenage Pregnancy Trend 29 Regeneration Profile 30 Part 2: Service Profile 33 Introduction 33 Section 1: Universal Offices 33 School and childcare data 33 1:Nursery Education and childcare 33 2:Primary Schools 34 3:Secondary Schools 34 4:Children’s Centres 35 5:Extended School Services 36 6: Childcare provision:summary 36 A. Childminders 37 B. Day Nurseries 37 C. Playgroups/Pre­schools 37 D. Out of School Clubs 38 Section 2: Additional services 38 Education Welfare Services 38 Social Care Services 38 Connexions 39 Youth Offending Services 39 Health provision 39 Youth provision 39 Voluntary provision 39 Key integrated performance indicators 39 Appendix 1: 40 Selected population data for Dukinfield, Stalybridge & Mossley Dukinfield, Stalybridge & Mossley : Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Dukinfield, Stalybridge & Mossley area, one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young peopleand families will be delivered. The other areas are Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw; Hyde, Hattersley & Longendale and Ashton under Lyne. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive; rather, key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between different localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data whilst Part 2 focuses on services. Part 1: Basic need data Population The table and graph below shows the 0-17 population across Tameside by area (including electoral wards) and is provided for comparison purposes. The data has been supplied from the PCT Nov 07. Total 0-17 % Hyde, Hattersley & 21.67 Longdendale 10612 Ashton 11051 22.56 Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield 12600 25.72 Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw 14718 30.05 Totals 48981 100.00 The uneven spread of population by area is explained by the presence of greater or lesser number of electoral wards in each area. This is also reflected in the spread of schools across Tameside (see Part 2). There are 5 wards in the Dukinfield,Stalybridge & Mossley area • Dukinfield • Dukinfield/Stalybridge • Stalybridge North • Stalybridge South • Mossley Appendix 1 provides the population estimates based on child benefit claims. This shows an estimate of 15,672 children and young people and an estimated 9,230 families. Appendix 2 shows the breakdown for each age and ward area as at Nov 07 Index of Multiple Deprivation The table below offers a useful summary of the relative position of different areas (Super output areas 1 (or SOAs), old and new ward (boundaries were changed in 2003) and District Assemblies) of disadvantage in Tameside. Data source Tameside policy unit 2004. The relevant areas for Dukinfield, Stalybridge & Mossley are highlighted in pink Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004 11 SOAs in worst 5% nationally Old Wards New Wards District Assemblies Ashton Hurst 2 Ashton Hurst 2 Ashton 5 Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton St Michaels 1 Denton & Audenshaw 1 Ashton St Peters 2 St Peters 2 Hyde 1 Denton South 1 Denton South 1 Longdendale & Hattersley 4 Hyde Godley 2 Hyde Godley/Hyde Werneth split 1 Hyde Werneth 1 Hyde Godley/Longdendale split 2 Longdendale 2 Longdendale 2 7 SOAs in worst 10% (but not worst 5%) nationally Old Wards New Wards District Assemblies Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton 2 Ashton St Peters 1 St Peters 1 Droylsden 1 Droylsden East 1 Droylsden East 1 Dukinfield 2 Dukinfield 2 Dukinfield 2 Mossley & NE Stalybridge 1 Mossley 1 Mossley 1 Stalybridge 1 Stalybridge North 1 Stalybridge North 1 32 SOAs in worst 20% (but not worst 10%) nationally Old Wards New Wards District Assemblies Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton 6 Ashton St Peters 2 St Peters 2 Denton & Audenshaw 7 Ashton Waterloo 3 St Peters / Audenshaw split 1 Droylsden 2 Audenshaw 2 Ashton Waterloo 3 Dukinfield 2 Denton North East 2 Audenshaw 1 Hyde 9 Denton South 3 Denton North East 2 Mossley & NE Stalybridge 1 Droylsden East 1 Denton South 3 Stalybridge 5 1 Super Output Areas are an amalgamation of the Census Output Areas used to publish results from the 2001 Census. The ones used for the Indices of Deprivation are Lower Layer Super Output Areas, with a population of about 1500 each. There are 141 of them in Tameside, and 32,482 in England as a whole. Droylsden West 1 Droylsden East 1 Dukinfield 1 Droylsden West 1 Dukinfield Stalybridge 2 Dukinfield 1 Hyde Godley 2 Dukinfield Stalybridge 1 Hyde Newton 6 Dukinfield Stalybridge / Stalybridge North Hyde Werneth 1 split 1 Stalybridge North 3 Hyde Godley 2 Stalybridge South 2 Hyde Newton 6 Hyde Werneth 1 Stalybridge North 3 Stalybridge South 2 12 SOAs in worst 25% (but not worst 20%) nationally Old Wards New Wards District Assemblies Ashton Hurst 2 Ashton Hurst 2 Ashton 5 Ashton St Michaels 1 Ashton St Michaels 1 Denton & Audenshaw 3 Ashton St Peters 1 St Peters 1 Droylsden 1 Ashton Waterloo 1 Ashton Waterloo 1 Hyde 1 Denton North East 1 Denton South 1 Mossley & NE Stalybridge 1 Denton South 1 Denton West 1 Stalybridge 1 Denton West 1 Denton NE / Denton South / Denton West Droylsden West 1 split 1 Hyde Godley 1 Droylsden West 1 Mossley 1 Hyde Godley 1 Stalybridge North 1 Mossley 1 Stalybridge North 1 The map below identifies the most disadvantaged SOAs and the priority neighbourhoods for Tameside. Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 Not in worst 50% Worst 50% Worst 25% Micklehurst Worst 10% Worst 5% Smallshaw Droylsden East Ridge Hill Ashton Copley Priority Newton Neighbourhoods Worst 5% Income Index Worst 5% Employment Index Worst 5% Health Index Denton Hattersley Worst 5% Education Index South © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Tameside MBC Licence No LA100022697, 2005. Child Poverty Index In 2000 the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister also produced a sub-set of the multiple index of deprivation for child poverty. This shows the following ranked2 data table by ward with the four areas colour coded: Child Child Index of Index of Poverty Poverty Multiple Multiple Index Index Deprivation Deprivation Score Rank Score Rank Ashton St. Peters' 55.45 641 58.05 306 Hyde Godley 54.06 724 52.92 467 Denton South 50.53 951 41.47 1023 Longdendale 47.26 1185 42.55 960 Ashton Hurst 44.82 1406 37.33 1312 Hyde Newton 44.41 1436 39.83 1131 Stalybridge North 43.73 1502 35.54 1448 2 The colour coding refers to the 4 areas within Tameside: Green: Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw Red: Ashton Blue: Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale Yellow: Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield Ashton St. Michael's 43.65 1513 40.54 1084 Hyde Werneth 39.9 1846 27.42 2296 Tameside 39.65 35.33 Dukinfield 38.69 1953 33.94 1584 Stalybridge South 38.34 1992 25.48 2583 Ashton Waterloo 36.87 2161 33.03 1670 Droylsden East 35.82 2295 32.09 1767 Denton North East 35.77 2299 28.97 2131 Droylsden West 33.82 2514 34.11 1567 Mossley 32.67 2645 29.56 2037 Audenshaw 29.15 3110 27.76 2252 Dukinfield Stalybridge 27.83 3310 29.71 2019 Denton West 20.51 4571 21.02 3366 Children in families receiving workless benefits The Joseph Rowntree Foundation3 has recently produced (2006) a composite study of children living in families receiving workless benefits (i.e. Income Support, Job Seekers Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance or Pension Credit) based on 2005 data. This is a very useful and the most recently available proxy indicator of children who may be living in poverty. The national average percentage of children age 0-15 who are dependent of workless benefits is 21%; in Tameside the average is 23.39%. Across Tameside wards the number and percentage of children 0­ 15 when ranked (most children first) shows the following pattern4 : Children Children dependent on % 0-15 dependent on receiving Child Ward Name workless benefits ­ workless benefits April Benefit 0-15 April Aged 0-15 April 2005 2005 2005 Ashton St. Peters' 865 2355 36.73% Longdendale 565 1885 29.97% Hyde Newton 770 2600 29.62% Hyde Godley 735 2530 29.05% Denton South 595 2080 28.61% Ashton Hurst 740 2605 28.41% Ashton St.
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001

    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001

    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
  • Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire

    Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire

    Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire Andrew Teale December 4, 2011 Abstract This submission disagrees with and presents a counter-proposal to the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals for new parliamentary con- stituency boundaries in Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The counter- proposal allocates seven whole constituencies to the boroughs of Stockport, Tameside and Oldham, nine whole constituencies to the boroughs of Man- chester, Salford and Trafford, and twenty-four whole constituencies to the rest of the region. No comment is made on the Boundary Commission’s proposals for the rest of the North West region or for any other region. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 The statutory criteria.........................2 1.2 Splitting of wards...........................3 2 Theoretical entitlements4 3 Southern Greater Manchester5 3.1 Manchester, Salford and Trafford..................5 3.2 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside.................. 10 4 Lancashire and Northern Greater Manchester 14 4.1 Crossing the boundary between Greater Manchester and Lancashire 16 4.2 Rochdale................................ 17 4.3 Bolton, Bury, Wigan and Rossendale................ 18 4.4 South Lancashire........................... 22 4.5 East Lancashire............................ 23 4.6 North Lancashire........................... 24 4.7 Summary................................ 25 5 Closing remarks 28 1 1 Introduction This document is my submission to the 2013 Review of Parliamentary constit- uency boundaries. I should first introduce myself. I am the editor and webmaster of the Lo- cal Elections Archive Project (http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/), the in- ternet’s largest freely available collection of British local election results. I have been for some years a contributor to election-related web forums, and this submission is based on material originally posted on the Vote UK forum (http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/) and in some cases modified in the light of comments made.
  • Area Profile

    Area Profile

    A profile of needs and s Services about children, young people and their families In the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area of Tameside September 2007 Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area, this is one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and their families will be delivered. The other areas are Ashton-under-Lyne: Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw and Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive, rather key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid the planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data, whilst Part 2 focuses on services. The top three categories of the new occupational classification are ‘Managers & Senior Officials; Professionals’ and Associate Professional & Technical’ (hatched at the top of the graph on right) Tameside as a whole comes 350 th out of 376 in the country for Professional; and bottom in Greater Manchester for all three categories
  • Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area

    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area

    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945

    The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945

    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
  • Stalybridge North Ward, Which Comes Into Effect on 10Th June 2004

    Stalybridge North Ward, Which Comes Into Effect on 10Th June 2004

    Census data used in this report are produced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and are © Crown Copyright Contents Residents Households Health P1 Age Structure of Population P4 Household Size P6 Limiting Long Term Illness Pensioner Households General Health P2 Ethnic Profile of Population Households with Children Carers Country of Birth Lone Parent Households P3 Religion Children in Households Work and Skills Marital Status with no Adult in Living Arrangements Employment P7 Economic Activity Unemployment P5 Tenure Vacant / Second Homes P8 Qualifications Property Size & Type Students Amenities Occupational Group Car Ownership N.B. This profile describes the new Stalybridge North ward, which comes into effect on 10th June 2004. The figures it contains must be regarded as provisional. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has yet to issue official and more accurate Census figures for the new wards. Interpreting Census Statistics Please note that small figures in Census tables are liable to be amended by the ONS to preserve confidentiality. This means that totals and percentages which logically ought to be the same may in fact be different, depending what table they come from. Useful Websites Basic Census results can be found at www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk, but these refer to pre-June 2004 wards. See also www.statistics.gov.uk and www.tameside.gov.uk For further information please contact Anne Cunningham in the Policy Unit on 0161 342 2170, or email [email protected] All data taken from 2001 Census. Technical differences between the 1991 and 2001 Censuses make comparison difficult, and ward definitions have changed since 1991.
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10

    (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10

    Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi
  • Migration Dividend Fund

    Migration Dividend Fund

    MIGRATION DIVIDEND FUND A GLOBAL FUTURE REPORT JULY 2019 Contents OUR DIRECTORS / ADVISORY BOARD 4 FOREWORD by Pat McFadden 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 PART ONE – Immigration and Towns: The Case for Action 18 PART TWO – A New Approach: The Migration Dividend Fund 51 PART THREE – Communicating The Scheme 75 This research was supported by Paul Hamlyn Foundation Global Future is a fresh voice in the debate about our country’s direction. We make the case for immigration, freedom of movement and building an open and vibrant Britain that looks out to the world and succeeds in it. We believe the dynamism of our economy and creativity of our culture depends on our country remaining open to people, trade and ideas from across the world. In the emerging political divide between open and closed visions for the future, we reject the narrow nationalism of those who want to close us off or who live in the myths of the past. Instead, we believe that the only way Britain can succeed in the future is as a vibrant and open nation that reaches out to the world. Global Future’s mission is not only to help people appreciate the benefits of openness but also to understand the genuine issues that stand in the way of realising these benefits for everyone. We will explore new ways for people to take more control over what matters most in their lives without cutting themselves off from opportunities to succeed in an interconnected world. Find out more: WWW.OURGLOBALFUTURE.COM TWITTER @Global_Future Our Directors Our Advisory Board GURNEK BAINS MIKE COUPE CEO and Founder
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90

    Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90

    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
  • Greater Manchester

    Greater Manchester

    Chapter 1 Greater Manchester 1.1 Bolton Left = Left List You = You Party Astley Bridge Farnworth Hilary Fairclough C 2,358 Jim Lord Lab 1,151 Clive Atty LD 733 Tariq Aziz LD 955 Muhammad Rafiq Lab 572 Michelle Ionn C 531 Andy Allen You 138 Bradshaw Great Lever [Lab gain from C] Walter Hall C 2,535 Mohammed Iqbal Lab 1,657 James Cottam Lab 620 Mudasir Dean C 1,299 Lauren Alergant LD 342 Alan Johnson Grn 374 Anne Mumberson Grn 195 Mian Akhtar LD 245 Halliwell Breightmet Cliff Morris Lab 1,875 Arthur Norris C 1,696 Shahid Mahmood C 632 William Gallagher Lab 1,182 Riaz Gul LD 494 Carl Hemmings BNP 350 Stephen Howarth LD 163 Harper Green Norma Armston You 137 Lynne Hyland Grn 74 Champak Mistry Lab 1,181 Bill Dawson C 1,071 David Connor LD 390 Bromley Cross Heaton and Lostock Alan Wilkinson C 2,933 Jeremy Foster Lab 705 Alan Rushton C 3,378 David Wibberley LD 331 John Gillatt Lab 831 Liz Spencer Grn 147 Jonathan Evans LD 326 Andy Openshaw You 141 Daniel Mann Grn 249 Horwich and Blackrod [C gain Crompton [Lab gain from LD] from LD] Hanif Darvesh Lab 1,985 Pat Barrow C 1,469 John Partington C 1,113 Kevan Jones Lab 1,021 Yakub Khoda LD 873 Ian Hamilton LD 869 4 1.2. BURY 5 Consolidated Results — Bolton Conservative . 29,254 41.8% 9 councillors Labour . 22,644 32.4% 7 councillors Liberal Democrat . 14,221 20.3% 4 councillors Green Party .
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside Report to The Electoral Commission August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 349 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 33 Appendices A Final recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 35 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 37 C First draft of electoral change Order for Tameside 39 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
  • Steven Pleasant – Chief Executive and Returning Officer

    Steven Pleasant – Chief Executive and Returning Officer

    Report To: COUNCIL Date: 25 May 2021 Reporting Officer: Steven Pleasant – Chief Executive and Returning Officer Subject: ELECTION OF COUNCILLORS Report Summary: To receive notification from the Chief Executive, the Returning Officer for the Local Elections held on 6 May 2021, as to which persons were elected in accordance with the Representation of the People Acts to hold the Office of Councillor for the Wards within Tameside Borough Council. Recommendations: That the report is noted. Links to Community The Constitution and democratic framework provides an Strategy: effective framework for implementing the Community Strategy. Policy Implications: There are no policy implications. Financial Implications: There are no additional budgetary implications. (Authorised by the Borough Treasurer) Legal Implications: Complies with the Representation of the People Acts. (Authorised by the Borough Solicitor) Risk Management: Publication of the outcome of the Elections ensures compliance with the Representation of the People Acts and the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Access to Information The background papers relating to this report can be inspected by contacting Robert Landon, Head of Democratic Services by: phone: 0161 342 2146 e-mail: [email protected] ANNUAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL – 25 MAY 2021 TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL REPORT OF THE RETURNING OFFICER ON THE PERSONS ELECTED TO THE OFFICE OF COUNCILLOR FOR THE WARDS INDICATED BELOW The following persons, at the elections held on 6 May 2021, were elected to the Office of Councillor for the Wards respectively indicated, to hold office for a period of four years:- WARD NAME AND PARTY OF COUNCILLOR ELECTED ASHTON HURST Dan Costello (Conservative) ASHTON ST.