DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Election Results 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Election Results 2010 General and Local Election Results 2010 Andrew Teale July 26, 2014 2 ELECTION RESULTS 2010 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2013. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 26 July 2014: Edenthorpe, Kirk Sandall and Barnby Dun ward, Doncaster now correctly shown as Labour gain from Independent. 24 November 2013: Corrected results for Vassall ward, Lambeth (typing error) and Reddish North ward, Stockport (LD candidate incorrectly shown as Labour). 21 November 2013: First version. Contents Introduction and Abbreviations 15 I General Election Results 17 1 General Election Results 2010 18 1.1 Abbreviations . 18 1.2 Results by constituency . 19 1.3 Consolidated Results . 69 II London Boroughs 73 2 North London 74 2.1 Barking and Dagenham . 74 2.2 Barnet . 76 2.3 Brent . 79 2.4 Camden . 83 2.5 Ealing . 86 2.6 Enfield . 89 2.7 Hackney . 91 2.8 Hammersmith and Fulham . 94 2.9 Haringey . 96 2.10 Harrow . 99 2.11 Havering . 102 2.12 Hillingdon . 105 2.13 Hounslow . 108 2.14 Islington . 111 2.15 Kensington and Chelsea . 113 2.16 Newham . 116 2.17 Redbridge . 119 2.18 Tower Hamlets . 122 2.19 Waltham Forest . 126 2.20 Westminster . 129 3 South London 132 3.1 Bexley . 132 3.2 Bromley . 135 3 4 ELECTION RESULTS 2010 3.3 Croydon . 138 3.4 Greenwich . 142 3.5 Kingston upon Thames . 144 3.6 Lambeth . 147 3.7 Lewisham . 150 3.8 Merton . 154 3.9 Richmond upon Thames . 156 3.10 Southwark . 159 3.11 Sutton . 162 3.12 Wandsworth . 165 III Metropolitan Boroughs 168 4 Greater Manchester 169 4.1 Bolton . 169 4.2 Bury................................... 170 4.3 Manchester . 172 4.4 Oldham . 174 4.5 Rochdale . 175 4.6 Salford . 177 4.7 Stockport . 179 4.8 Tameside . 180 4.9 Trafford . 182 4.10 Wigan . 183 5 Merseyside 186 5.1 Knowsley . 186 5.2 Liverpool . 187 5.3 St Helens . 190 5.4 Sefton . 191 5.5 Wirral . 193 6 South Yorkshire 195 6.1 Barnsley . 195 6.2 Doncaster . 197 6.3 Rotherham . 198 6.4 Sheffield . 200 7 Tyne and Wear 203 7.1 Gateshead . 203 7.2 Newcastle upon Tyne . 205 7.3 North Tyneside . 207 7.4 South Tyneside . 208 7.5 Sunderland . 209 CONTENTS 5 8 West Midlands 212 8.1 Birmingham . 212 8.2 Coventry . 215 8.3 Dudley . 217 8.4 Sandwell . 219 8.5 Solihull . 221 8.6 Walsall . 222 8.7 Wolverhampton . 224 9 West Yorkshire 226 9.1 Bradford . 226 9.2 Calderdale . 228 9.3 Kirklees . 230 9.4 Leeds . 232 9.5 Wakefield . 234 IV Unitary Councils 237 10 East Midlands Unitaries 238 10.1 Derby . 238 11 Eastern Unitaries 240 11.1 Peterborough . 240 11.2 Southend-on-Sea . 241 11.3 Thurrock . 243 12 North East Unitaries 245 12.1 Hartlepool . 245 13 North West Unitaries 247 13.1 Blackburn with Darwen . 247 13.2 Halton . 248 13.3 Warrington . 250 14 South East Unitaries 252 14.1 Milton Keynes . 252 14.2 Portsmouth . 254 14.3 Reading . 255 14.4 Slough . 256 14.5 Southampton . 257 14.6 Wokingham . 258 15 South West Unitaries 261 15.1 Bristol . 261 15.2 Plymouth . 263 15.3 Swindon . 265 16 West Midlands Unitaries 267 16.1 Stoke-on-Trent . 267 6 ELECTION RESULTS 2010 17 Yorkshire and the Humber Unitaries 270 17.1 Kingston upon Hull . 270 17.2 North East Lincolnshire . 272 V Shire Districts 274 18 Cambridgeshire 275 18.1 Cambridge . 275 18.2 Huntingdonshire . 276 18.3 South Cambridgeshire . 278 19 Cumbria 280 19.1 Barrow-in-Furness . 280 19.2 Carlisle . 281 19.3 South Lakeland . 282 20 Derbyshire 284 20.1 Amber Valley . 284 21 Devon 286 21.1 Exeter . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gavin Ames Avid Editor
    Gavin Ames Avid Editor Profile Gavin is an exceptionally talented editor. Fast, creative, and very technically minded. He is one of the best music editors around, with vast live multi-cam experience ranging from The Isle of Wight Festival, to Take That, Faithless and Primal Scream concerts. Since excelling in the music genre, Gavin went on to develop his skills in comedy, editing Shooting Stars. His talents have since gone from strength to strength and he now has a wide range of high-end credits under his belt, such as live stand up for Bill Bailey, Steven Merchant, Ed Byrne and Angelos Epithemiou. He has also edited sketch comedy, a number of studio shows and comedy docs. Gavin has a real passion for editing comedy and clients love working with him so much that they ask him back time and time again! Comedy / Entertainment / Factual “The World According to Jeff Goldblum” Series 2. Through the prism of Jeff Goldblum's always inquisitive and highly entertaining mind, nothing is as it seem. Each episode is centred around something we all love — like sneakers or ice cream — as Jeff pulls the thread on these deceptively familiar objects and unravels a wonderful world of astonishing connections, fascinating science and history, amazing people, and a whole lot of surprising big ideas and insights. Nutopia for National Geographic and Disney + “Guessable” In this comedy game show, two celebrity teams compete to identify the famous name or object inside a mystery box. Sara Pascoe hosts the show with John Kearns on hand as her assistant. Alan Davies and Darren Harriott are the team captains, in a format that puts a twist on classic family games.
    [Show full text]
  • Bears and Traditional Medicine World Animal Protection Email: [email protected]
    Correspondent: Mr Gilbert M. Sape Global Head of Campaign - Bears and Traditional Medicine World Animal Protection Email: [email protected] Joint open letter to: Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Dr Zhang Qi Director General Co-ordinator of Traditional and Complementary World Health Organisation Medicine Unit (TCM) Avenue Appia 20 Department of Service Delivery and Safety 1211 Geneva World Health Organisation Switzerland Avenue Appia 20 1211 Geneva Switzerland 6th April 2020 Dear Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Dr Zhang Qi, COVID-19: Health risks and wildlife1 markets – the need for a permanent global ban on wildlife markets and a highly precautionary approach to wildlife trade. The undersigned organisations acknowledge and commend the World Health Organisation’s current efforts to contain the pandemic spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). On the occasion of World Health Day, in the midst of a global pandemic believed to have originated in a live wildlife market, we call upon the WHO to publicly and unequivocally state the proven link between these markets and serious threats to human health. In line with its stated mission to serve public health at all times, we urge the WHO to recommend that governments worldwide permanently ban live wildlife markets and the use of wildlife in traditional medicine. This decisive action, well within the WHO’s mandate, would be an impactful first step in adopting a highly precautionary approach to wildlife trade that poses a risk to human health. While a robust global response is critical in detecting, treating and reducing transmission, it is equally necessary to take vital measures to prevent similar emerging infectious diseases developing into pandemics with the associated threats to human life, and social and economic well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Licensing Committee, 05/12/2017 10:00
    Public Document Pack LICENSING COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD IN CIVIC HALL, LEEDS ON TUESDAY, 5TH DECEMBER, 2017 AT 10.00 AM MEMBERSHIP Councillors N Buckley Alwoodley; R Downes Otley and Yeadon; J Dunn Ardsley and Robin Hood; B Flynn Adel and Wharfedale; B Gettings Morley North; M Harland Kippax and Methley; G Hyde Killingbeck and Seacroft; A Khan Burmantofts and Richmond Hill; B Selby (Chair) Killingbeck and Seacroft; C Townsley Horsforth; G Wilkinson Wetherby; A Garthwaite Headingley; K Groves Middleton Park; S McKenna Garforth and Swillington; J Pryor Headingley; Agenda compiled by: John Grieve Tel No: (0113) 37 88662 Governance Services Civic Hall LEEDS LS1 1UR Produced on Recycled Paper A A G E N D A Item Ward/Equal Item Not Page No Opportunities Open No 1 APPEALS AGAINST REFUSAL OF INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and public will be excluded) (*In accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2, written notice of an appeal must be received by the Head of Governance Services at least 24 hours before the meeting) 2 EXEMPT INFORMATION - POSSIBLE EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC 1 To highlight reports or appendices which officers have identified as containing exempt information, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report. 2 To consider whether or not to accept the officers recommendation in respect of the above information.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 193 Dec 2005/Jan 2006 £1.00
    CAATnews 75% OF ARMS DEALS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT OUR HELP Issue 193 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ Dec 2005/Jan 2006 Tel: 020 7281 0297 Fax: 020 7281 4369 £1.00 Email: [email protected] Website: www.caat.org.uk CAATnews IN THIS ISSUE... Editor Melanie Jarman [email protected] Legal Consultant Glen Reynolds Proofreader Rachel Vaughan Design Richie Andrew Contributors Bristol CAAT, Kathryn Busby, Beccie D’Cunha, Ann Feltham, Nicholas Gilby, Anna Jones, Mike Lewis, James O’Nions, Ian Prichard, South Essex CAAT. Thank you also to our dedicated team of CAATnews stuffers. Printed by Russell Press on 100% recycled paper using only post consumer de-inked waste. Copy deadline for the next issue is 12 January 2006. We shall be posting it the week beginning 26 January 2006. Content of most website references are also available in print – contact CAAT National Gathering – see page 6 PATRICK DELANEY the CAAT office. Contributors to CAATnews express Countdown to DESO 3 their own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of CAAT as an organisation. Contributors retain Arms Trade Shorts 4–5 copyright of all work used. CAAT was set up in 1974 and is a broad coalition of groups and News and updates 6 individuals working for the reduction and ultimate abolition of the Local campaign news and views 7 international arms trade, together with progressive demilitarisation within arms-producing countries. Cover story: DESO 8–9 Campaign Against Arms Trade 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ Feature: Arms trade treaty 10 tel: 020 7281 0297 fax: 020 7281 4369 email: [email protected] Reed campaign 11 web: www.caat.org.uk If you use Charities Aid Foundation cheques and would like to help TREAT Parliamentary 12 (Trust for Research and Education on Arms Trade), please send CAF Clean investment campaign 13 cheques, payable to TREAT, to the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative
    Assembly and Executive Review Committee Review of the Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly and on the Reduction in the Number of Northern Ireland Departments Part 1 - Number of Members of the Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly Together with the Minutes of Proceedings of the Committee relating to the Report, the Minutes of Evidence, Written Submissions, Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Papers and Other Papers Ordered by the Assembly and Executive Review Committee to be printed on 12 June 2012 Report: NIA 52/11-15 (Assembly and Executive Review Committee) REPORT EMBARGOED UNTIL COMMENCEMENT OF THE DEBATE IN PLENARY Mandate 2011/15 Second Report Committee Powers and Membership Committee Powers and Membership Powers The Assembly and Executive Review Committee is a Standing Committee established in accordance with Section 29A and 29B of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and Standing Order 59 which provide for the Committee to: ■ consider the operation of Sections 16A to 16C of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and, in particular, whether to recommend that the Secretary of State should make an order amending that Act and any other enactment so far as may be necessary to secure that they have effect, as from the date of the election of the 2011 Assembly, as if the executive selection amendments had not been made; ■ make a report to the Secretary of State, the Assembly and the Executive Committee, by no later than 1 May 2015, on the operation of Parts III and IV of the Northern Ireland Act 1998; and ■ consider such other matters relating to the functioning of the Assembly or the Executive as may be referred to it by the Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017
    Consultation on proposed changes to bus routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Summary of issues raised during consultation ......................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Detailed description ........................................................................................ 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 7 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 7 2.6 What we asked ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Allchurches Trust Beneficiaries 2020
    ALLCHURCHES TRUST LIMITED Beneficiaries of grants awarded in 2020 1 During the year, the charity awarded grants for the following national projects: 2020 £000 Grants for national projects: 4Front Theatre, Worcester, Worcestershire 2 A Rocha UK, Southall, London 15 Archbishops' Council of the Church of England, London 2 Archbishops' Council, London 105 Betel UK, Birmingham 120 Cambridge Theological Federation, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire 2 Catholic Marriage Care Ltd, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire 16 Christian Education t/a RE Today Services, Birmingham, West Midlands 280 Church Pastoral Aid Society (CPAS), Coventry, West Midlands 7 Counties (formerly Counties Evangelistic Work), Westbury, Wiltshire 3 Cross Rhythms, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire 3 Fischy Music, Edinburgh 4 Fusion, Loughborough, Leicestershire 83 Gregory Centre for Church Multiplication, London 350 Home for Good, London 1 HOPE Together, Rugby, Warwickshire 17 Innervation Trust Limited, Hanley Swan, Worcestershire 10 Keswick Ministries, Keswick, Cumbria 9 Kintsugi Hope, Boreham, Essex 10 Linking Lives UK, Earley, Berkshire 10 Methodist Homes, Derby, Derbyshire 4 Northamptonshire Association of Youth Clubs (NAYC), Northampton, Northamptonshire 6 Plunkett Foundation, Woodstock, Oxfordshire 203 Pregnancy Centres Network, Winchester, Hampshire 7 Relational Hub, Littlehampton, West Sussex 120 Restored, Teddington, Middlesex 8 Safe Families for Children, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire 280 Safe Families, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear 8 Sandford St Martin (Church of England) Trust,
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Chief Standard Work': the Rise and Fall of David Hume's' History of England'. 1754-C. 1900
    ’A CHIEF STANDARD WORK’: THE RISE AND FALL OF DAVID HUME’S HISTORY OF ENGLAND. 1754-C.1900. UNIVERSITY OF LONDON PhD THESIS JAMES ANDREW GEORGE BAVERSTOCK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE [LONOIK. ProQuest Number: 10018558 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10018558 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract. This thesis examines the influence of David Hume’s History of England during the century of its greatest popularity. It explores how far the long-term fortunes of Hume’s text matched his original aims for the work. Hume’s success in creating a classic popular narrative is demonstrated, but is contrasted with the History's failure to promote the polite ’coalition of parties’ he wished for. Whilst showing that Hume’s popularity contributed to tempering some of the teleological excesses of the ’whig version’ of English history, it is stressed that his work signally failed in dampening ’Whig’/ ’Tory’ conflict. Rather than provide a new frame of reference for British politics, as Hume had intended, the History was absorbed into national political culture as a ’Tory’ text - with important consequences for Hume’s general reputation as a thinker.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Credit and Brexit
    Housing, Credit and Brexit Ben Ansell∗ Abstract Dozens of articles have been drafted attempting to explain the narrow vic- tory for the Leave campaign in Britain’s EU referendum in June 2016. Yet, hitherto, and despite a general interest in ‘Left Behind’ commentary, few writ- ers have drawn attention to the connection between the Brexit vote and the distribution of British housing costs. This memo examines the connection be- tween house prices and both aggregate voting during the EU referendum and individual vote intention beforehand. I find a very strong connection at the local authority, ward, and individual level between house prices and support for the Remain campaign, one that even holds up within regions and local authorities. Preliminary analysis suggests that housing values reflect long-run social differences that are just as manifest in attitudes to immigration as Brexit. Local ‘ecologies of unease’ (Reeves and Gimpel, 2012) appear a crucial force behind Brexit. This is a short memo on housing, credit and Brexit to be presented at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 2017. ∗Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield College, University of Oxford. [email protected]. My acknowledgements and thanks go to Jane Gingrich for the provision of local economic and housing data. 1 1 Introduction If there is one saving grace of Brexit for the British higher education system it is a boom of Brexit studies that began pouring forth as the dust settled on June 24th 2016. Most scholars have coalesced around an understanding of Brexit that to some extent mirrors that implicit in Theresa May’s quasi hard Brexit strategy - Brexit was caused by both economic and cultural forces, with opposition to the European Union based on concerns about immigration and of declining cultural and social status rather than economic deprivation or actual migration levels per se (Kaufmann, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • 5. APPENDIX 3 Letter Attachment 210720
    Transcript of Conservative G roup (London Borough of Havering) meeting held at Havering Town Hall on 03 February 2020 Speakers (in order of first speaking) - All Conservative councillors Cllr Damian White (DW) Cllr Joshua Chapman (JC) Cllr Robert Benham (RobB) Cllr Bob Perry (BP) Cllr Timothy Ryan (TR) Cllr Roger Ramsey (RR) Cllr Ray Best (RayB) Cllr Christine Vickery (CV) Other persons mentioned in audio (in order of first mention ) Andrew Blake-Herbert (Chief Executive, London Borough of Havering) (AB-H) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative MP for Romford) (AR) Cllr Darren Wise (North Havering Residents Group) (DWise) Cllr Brian Eagling (North Havering Residents Group) (BE) Julia Lopez MP (Conservative MP for Hornchurch and Upminster) (JL) Andrew Boff (Conservative Party - London Assembly Assembly Member) (ABoff) T ime on audio (mm:ss) (Paragraph breaks in text are for easier reading purposes only) Audio starts. 00:00 - 02:53 DW - "One is with the 52 councillors....(00:03 - 00:05 Inaudible) ......basically the parameters that we need. And all need to be different aspects of the Boundary Commission’s technical guidance. Instead of submitting those four to the Full Council when we decide which ones we want subject, er, us doing the amendments, Andrew (AB-H) has now agreed that we can have a Governance Committee meeting to, um, discuss the four options, pick which one we like, make any amend, recommendations and changes to it and that then goes on to Full Council as an administration amendment or a motion, so the previous one gives the officers..... (00:39 - 00:47 mostly inaudible) ......the option of going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Co-Operative Council
    The Co-operative Council Sharing power: A new settlement between citizens and the state Lambeth’s proposal to become a Co-operative Council has generated a striking amount of passion, interest and debate over the past year. This new approach to public service delivery aims to reshape the settlement between citizens and the state by handing more power to local people so that a real partnership of equals can emerge. I believe the huge level of interest in our ideas both locally and nationally is driven by a genuine desire to find new and better ways to deliver public services in the 21st century. Although we publish this report at a time of unprecedented Government cuts in funding for local services, ours is not a cuts-driven agenda. I believe that if we do not make this change then the future of public services will be much more uncertain. The Co-operative Council draws inspiration from the values of fairness, accountability and responsibility that have driven progressive politics in this country for centuries. It is about putting the resources of the state at the disposal of citizens so that they can take control of the services they receive and the places where they live. More than just volunteering, it is about finding new ways in which citizens can participate in the decisions that affect their lives. The Co-operative Council is also not just about changing the council, it is about building more co-operative communities and realising that, for too long, the council has stood in the way rather than supported this development.
    [Show full text]