DOCSLIB.ORG

Routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017 Consultation on proposed changes to bus routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Summary of issues raised during consultation ......................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Detailed description ........................................................................................ 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 7 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 7 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................... 7 2.7 Methods of responding ................................................................................... 8 2.8 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................... 8 2.10 Analysis of consultation responses ............................................................. 9 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 10 3.1 Number of respondents ................................................................................ 10 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation (public respondents) .......... 10 3.3 Methods of responding (public respondents) ............................................... 10 4. Summary of all consultation responses ............................................................ 11 4.1 Summary of responses to Question 1 and 2 ................................................ 11 4.2 Summary of responses to Question 3 .......................................................... 11 4.3 Summary of responses to Question 4 .......................................................... 12 4.4 Summary of responses to Question 5 .......................................................... 12 4.5 Issues commonly raised ............................................................................... 13 4.6 Summary of stakeholder responses ............................................................. 13 4.7 Comments on the consultation ..................................................................... 16 5. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 17 2 Appendix B: Main issues raised ................................................................................ 23 Appendix C: List of stakeholders consulted ............................................................... 25 3 Executive summary Between 24 January and 7 March 2017, we consulted on proposals to remove the double run in both directions for routes 289 and 455 at Waddon Marsh, and the double run southbound for route 289 into Croydon Colonnades. We received 267 responses to the consultation (including seven responses from stakeholders). Of the 260 public responses: 45 per cent supported or strongly supported the proposed removal of the double run for route 289 at Croydon Colonnades, 23 per cent neither supported nor opposed the change, while 30 per cent opposed or strongly opposed the proposal. Three per cent didn’t answer 37 per cent supported or strongly supported the proposed removal of the double run for route 289 at Waddon Marsh, nine per cent neither supported nor opposed the change, while 52 per cent opposed or strongly opposed the proposal. Three per cent didn’t answer 31 per cent supported or strongly supported the proposed removal of the double run for route 455 at Waddon Marsh, 26 per cent neither supported nor opposed the change, while 40 per cent opposed or strongly opposed the proposal. Three per cent didn’t answer Summary of issues raised during consultation Concerned that the removal of the double run at Waddon Marsh would be inconvenient for customers, especially those with reduced mobility, wishing to use the shops at the Purley Centre, the Waddon Marsh tram stop, as well as for residents of New South Quarter Concerned that there were no safe crossing facilities at Waddon Marsh to allow customers to cross Purley Way Felt that the time savings made did not justify the inconvenience for customers Felt that proposed changes were sensible and generally supported proposals Commented that routes 289 and 455 are both unreliable and should have an increase in frequency Next steps After considering all of the responses, we have decided to go ahead with the scheme as proposed. In addition, route 455 will serve stop H northbound on Purley Way. 4 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction The London bus network is kept under regular review. As part of this, we develop proposals for changes to services. Consultation was undertaken on proposals to make some changes to route 289 at Waddon Marsh and Croydon Colonnades, and route 455 at Waddon Marsh. 1.2 Purpose We proposed the changes in order to reduce journey times and increase reliability on routes 289 and 455. 1.3 Detailed description Route 289 operates between Elmers End station and Purley station. Route 455 runs between Purley and Wallington station. At Waddon Marsh, routes 289 and 455 currently run in a loop via Trafalgar Way and Drury Crescent in both directions. In addition, route 289 runs into Croydon Colonnades in the southbound direction only. To reduce journey times and improve reliability, we proposed removing both of these ‘double runs’ so that routes 289 and 455 would run directly along Purley Way at these locations instead. We estimate that the changes at Waddon Marsh would save about three minutes of journey time each for routes 289 and 455, and altering route 289 at Croydon Colonnades would save around one minute. At busy times, the time savings could be greater, as buses attempting to access Purley Way from both Waddon Marsh and Croydon Colonnades can experience long delays due to congestion. Avoiding Waddon Marsh would mean that routes 289 and 455 no longer serve two bus stops – Waddon Marsh Tram Stop and The Purley Way Centre – in both directions. Passengers would have to walk about 200 metres to existing stops on Purley Way. Removing the southbound double run for route 289 at Croydon Colonnades would mean that the route would no longer serve The Colonnades/Croydon Airport bus stop. Passengers would need to walk 90 metres to Purley Way, where a new southbound bus stop would be provided. 5 There would be no changes to the frequency of either route as a result of these proposals. 6 2. About the consultation 2.1 Purpose The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the proposals To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions 2.2 Potential outcomes The potential outcomes of the consultation were: Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide to proceed with the scheme as set out in the consultation Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we modify the proposals in response to issues raised and proceed with a revised scheme Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide not to proceed with the scheme Our conclusion and next steps are set out in Section 5. 2.4 Who we consulted We sought the views of customers currently using route 289 and 455, as well as local businesses in the Waddon Marsh and Croydon Colonnades areas. We also consulted stakeholders including the London Boroughs of Croydon and Sutton, London TravelWatch, local politicians, and local resident and community groups. A full list of the stakeholders consulted can be found in Appendix C. 2.5 Dates and duration This was a six week consultation which ran between 24 January and 7 March 2017. 2.6 What we asked The questionnaire asked six generic questions relating to name, email address, postcode, organisation name (if responding on behalf of a business/stakeholder/organisation), how they had heard about the consultation, and 7 views on the quality of the consultation (respondents were asked two questions on the quality: to rate in a scale from very good to very poor; and to provide any comments). There were six questions specific to the consultation: How often do you use route 289? (Respondents were given a choice of six answers: Daily, 2-3 days a week, once
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. APPENDIX 3 Letter Attachment 210720
    Transcript of Conservative G roup (London Borough of Havering) meeting held at Havering Town Hall on 03 February 2020 Speakers (in order of first speaking) - All Conservative councillors Cllr Damian White (DW) Cllr Joshua Chapman (JC) Cllr Robert Benham (RobB) Cllr Bob Perry (BP) Cllr Timothy Ryan (TR) Cllr Roger Ramsey (RR) Cllr Ray Best (RayB) Cllr Christine Vickery (CV) Other persons mentioned in audio (in order of first mention ) Andrew Blake-Herbert (Chief Executive, London Borough of Havering) (AB-H) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative MP for Romford) (AR) Cllr Darren Wise (North Havering Residents Group) (DWise) Cllr Brian Eagling (North Havering Residents Group) (BE) Julia Lopez MP (Conservative MP for Hornchurch and Upminster) (JL) Andrew Boff (Conservative Party - London Assembly Assembly Member) (ABoff) T ime on audio (mm:ss) (Paragraph breaks in text are for easier reading purposes only) Audio starts. 00:00 - 02:53 DW - "One is with the 52 councillors....(00:03 - 00:05 Inaudible) ......basically the parameters that we need. And all need to be different aspects of the Boundary Commission’s technical guidance. Instead of submitting those four to the Full Council when we decide which ones we want subject, er, us doing the amendments, Andrew (AB-H) has now agreed that we can have a Governance Committee meeting to, um, discuss the four options, pick which one we like, make any amend, recommendations and changes to it and that then goes on to Full Council as an administration amendment or a motion, so the previous one gives the officers..... (00:39 - 00:47 mostly inaudible) ......the option of going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vote for Confidence?
    DR Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority February 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen‟s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper Elections Review Working Group Members Andrew Boff (Chairman) Conservative Jennette Arnold Labour Len Duvall Labour Darren Johnson Green Steve O‟Connell Conservative Caroline Pidgeon Liberal Democrat Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 8 1 Introduction 10 2 Issues to be reviewed 12 3 Queues and people being unable to vote 15 4 Administrative challenges: Voter registration and postal votes 26 5 The Count 33 6 Learning lessons from the May 2010 elections in London 35 Appendix 2 Individual Registration 39 Appendix 3 Orders and translations 40 6 Foreword We pride ourselves that democracy is in this country's DNA. There is a danger that that pride can lead to complacency. The elections in May 2010 were a reminder that we should constantly review the mechanisms that are in place to enable the citizen's right to vote. The 2010 elections will be remembered for the crowds outside the polling stations. In Hackney and Islington, those crowds were waiting patiently to vote but hundreds were unable to exercise that fundamental right when the polls closed. In other parts of London, those crowds were last minute canvassers, trying to cajole voters into supporting, or not supporting, particular candidates .
    [Show full text]
  • Building Inclusive Communities: Practical and Local Initiatives to Promote Migrant Integration"
    TRANSCRIPT "BUILDING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: PRACTICAL AND LOCAL INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE MIGRANT INTEGRATION" A Conversation With Simon Woolley, Jonathan Portes, Alan Broadbent, Dan Silver, Karen Bellamy, Andrew Boff, Ratna Omidvar and Cynthia Masiyiwa Moderator: Rob Berkley ANNOUNCER: You're listening to a recording of the Open Society Foundations, working to build vibrant and tolerant democracies worldwide. Visit us at OpenSocietyFoundations.org. ROB BERKLEY: My name's Rob Berkley, I'm director of the Runnymede Trust. I'm one of the organizations-- that's come together to put on this event along with (UNINTEL PHRASE) and the Open Society Foundations. So, I'm-- without further ado, I wanna hand over to Simon Woolley. He's director of the opera-- of Operation Black Vote. Welcome. SIMON WOOLLEY: Thank you. Thank you-- thank you very much. Good-- good afternoon, everyone. Actually, I have the impossible task of replacing the irreplaceable. I'm replacing Nazia Hussain who is the director of At Home in Europe here at the Open Society Foundation. My role here, with the foundation, is the chair of At Home in Europe. And we want to warmly welcome to our establishment, to our premises, and to this program which we think is vitally important. We are very happy to be partners, but not least because we think that working TRANSCRIPT: 2 B UILDING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: PRACTICAL AND LOCAL INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE MIGRA NT INTEGRATION together is best, it ensures that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. We learn from each other. We support each other. And-- we achieve a great deal more-- together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Croydon Plan Page 2 Page 3
    The Croydon Plan Page 2 Page 3 Chapter One Introduction to The Croydon Plan Crystal Palace This document describes our plans to address describe what we want to achieve, and how & Upper Croydon’s needs for the next 20 years we will achieve it by stating Our Ambitions, Norwood and beyond. By setting out proposals for Our Targets and Our Main Actions. These are Norbury new homes, jobs and infrastructure, whilst organised by Chapters, each covering a key respecting Croydon’s sense of place, we can theme. Thornton South Heath plan for a positive future. The following pages Norwood & Woodside Croydon Today Croydon Tomorrow Broad Green Croydon in 2013 is a borough with many strengths and We want Croydon to be London’s most Enterprising & Selhurst opportunities. Of course, there are also challenges to be Borough. Excellent transport connections to Central faced, which this Plan aims to address. London, Gatwick and Brighton mean that the borough is Addiscombe well placed to achieve this. Croydon • Croydon is made of a series of distinct places Opportunity from Victorian railway suburbs in the north, to 20th Following a consultation with over 20,000 people, we Area Shirley century suburbs on wooded hillsides in the south have developed a number of over-arching ambitions for and developments away from the railway line in the the Borough, all of which inform the Ambitions, Targets east. and Actions in this document: Waddon • Croydon’s population is due to increase by 3,500 • Create a premier business centre, where creative South Croydon over the next 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the London Borough of Croydon Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the London Borough of Croydon electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from residents in Croydon. The submissions from have been collated into one document. They have been sorted alphabetically, by surname. (L-Q) Maureen 2 Levy Colin Hart 1 Anthony 1 Harris Graham 1 Bass Simon Hoar 1 Anne Giles 1 Andy 1 Stranack Margaret 1 Bird Mario 2 Creatura Tim Pollard 2 Brian 1 Longman and Phil Thomas Scott Roche 1 Amy Pollard 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Gareth 1 Streeter Graeme 1 Fillmore Jonathan 1 Cope Lara Fish 1 Luke 1 Springthorpe Mark 1 Johnson Samir 1 Dwesar Sylvia 1 Macdonald Sarah Davis 1 Anthony 2 Pearson Alasdair 1 Stewart Badsha 1 Quadir Chris Philp 1 Chris Wright 1 Croydon 1 Conservativ e Group Dudley 1 Mead Fredeic 1 Demay Gavin 1 Barwell Helen 1 Pollard Jason 1 Cummings Lianne 1 Bruney Luke Clancy 1 Lynne Hale 1 Mario 2 Creatura Michael 1 Neal Mike Fisher 1 Richard 1 Chatterjee Robert 1 Sleeman Sara 1 Bashford Simon Brew 1 Sue Bennett 1 Tim Pollard 2 Yvette 1 Hopley Adam 1 O'Neill Adrian 1 Dennis Andrew 1 Frazer Ann Willard 1 Anthony 1 Sandford Catherine 1 Saunders Cheryl Purle 1 Christopher 1 King Croydon 1 South Labour Party David 1 Cantrell Deirdre Lea 1 Dennis King 1 Derek Lea 1 Diane 1 Hearne Elizabeth 1 Agyepong Fenella 1 Cardwell Gisela 1 James Janet 1 Stollery Jill Kilsby 1 Joseph 1 Rowe Kate Liffen 1 London 1 Borough of Croydon Maggie 2 Jackson Maggie 2 Jackson Martin 1 Wheatley Matthew 1 Taylor Michael 1 Bevington Paul Scott 1 Peter 1 Morgan Phil Reed 1 Philippa 1 Toogood Rita Barfoot 1 Sharon 1 Swaby Sheila 1 Childs Thornton 1 Heath Neighbourho od Association and BLP Toby 1 Keynes While consultation deadlines have prevented many of the organisations from making submissions, they have still taken steps to encourage their local members to respond, highlighting the way the draft recommendations run counter to local identities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Elections in the UK
    Challenging elections in the UK September 2012 Electoral Commission 1 Election disputes are inherent to elections. Challenging an election, its conduct or its results, should however not be perceived as a reflection of weakness … but proof of the strength, vitality and openness of the political system…the right to vote would be merely abstract if the right to sue to enforce it was not guaranteed in law Denis Petit (OSCE / ODIHR), Resolving Election Disputes, 2000 …the law is framed at both a procedural and substantive level precisely so as to discourage the bringing of election petitions… The rules are complex and would certainly benefit from a thorough examination and redrafting in order both to modernise the rules and to clarify some of the issues. The law dates from 1868, for its wording is almost an exact copy of the relevant provisions of the Parliamentary Elections Act 1868 Prof Bob Watt, UK Election Law: A Critical Examination, 2006 Electoral systems and technology have changed, voter and candidate qualifications have altered, human rights law has entered the regulation of the political process, but the law on petitions remains staunchly rooted in Victorian quasi-democratic precepts…Our democracy requires fundamental redesign of the processes for securing judicial scrutiny of the electoral process… Dr Heather Lardy, ‘Challenging Elections’, Scottish Legal Action Group Journal, 2007 Electoral Commission 2 Contents Executive summary…………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….6 The Law Commission’s review of electoral law and challenging elections……..6 The UK’s system for challenging elections………………………………………..7 International principles……………………………………………………………...8 Compliance of the UK’s election petition system with international principles…..…...13 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 588KB
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017–19 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP (Chair, Labour, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) Rehman Chishti MP (Conservative, Gillingham and Rainham) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Janet Daby MP (Labour, Lewisham East) Stephen Doughty MP (Labour (Co-op), Cardiff South and Penarth) Chris Green MP (Conservative, Bolton West) Kate Green MP (Labour, Stretford and Urmston) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth & Kirkintilloch East) Toby Perkins MP (Labour, Chesterfield) Douglas Ross MP (Conservative, Moray) The following Members were members of the Committee during the Session: Preet Kaur Gill MP (Labour (Co-op), Birmingham, Edgbaston) Sarah Jones MP (Labour, Croydon Central) Kirstene Hair MP (Conservative, Angus) Rt Hon Esther McVey MP (Conservative, Tatton) Alex Norris MP (Labour (Co-op), Nottingham North) Will Quince MP (Conservative, Colchester) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) John Woodcock MP (Independent, Barrow and Furness) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly and All Londoners up to Date As This Develops
    Appendix 1 Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 18 June 2020 Transcript of Item 4 – Oral update to the Mayor’s Report Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Good morning, Chair. Good morning, Assembly Members. COVID-19 is the biggest challenge our city has faced since the Second World War and we are continuing to do all that we can from City Hall to prevent a catastrophic second wave of this deadly disease. One of the huge consequences is the devastating impact this had on London’s public finances, which were in good shape before the pandemic hit. Transport for London’s (TfL) income from fares has dropped by more than 90% and income from local business rates and council tax has fallen off the cliff. That is why I warned yesterday that we will be left with no choice but to make significant cuts across the Mayoral bodies unless the Government urgently acts to support local and regional authorities across the country. I would urge all Assembly Members to join me and the many mayors and local authority leaders from across the political divide who are putting pressure on the Government to do the right thing. Whatever happens, I will do what I can to protect front line services as much as possible, and it is only right that I should volunteer for an immediate pay cut and continue to not take any pension contributions in these extremely difficult circumstances. New budget guidance will be published shortly and I will keep the London Assembly and all Londoners up to date as this develops.
    [Show full text]
  • T H E M U S L I M C O U N C I L O F B R I T A
    T H E M U S L I M C O U N C I L O F B R I T A I N Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX United Kingdom 28 May 2019 Dear David Isaac CBE, I am writing on behalf of the Muslim Council of Britain – the largest umbrella body of Muslim organisations in the UK – to formally request the Equalities and Human Rights Commission to investigate whether the Conservative Party has breached its obligations under the Equality Act. Given the Act makes it unlawful for the Party to discriminate against its members, prospective members or its guests, we believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a prima facie case to answer of systemic unlawful acts by the Party. The main pillars of the case proposed are as follows: 1. Islamophobia amongst Members of Parliament: When Members of Parliament engaged in Islamophobia or a campaign for Mayor of London engaged in Islamophobia, no action was taken, demonstrating a tolerance for Islamophobia at the highest levels of the Party; 2. Atmosphere of Hostility Against Muslim Conservative Party Members: Islamophobia has also been tolerated towards Muslim members of the Party, indicating an atmosphere of hostility towards Muslims in the Party; 3. Scale of Islamophobia in the Party: The problem of Islamophobia runs deep into the Party with a total of c.150 representatives of the Party and members of the Party who have engaged in Islamophobia; 4. Failure of Complaints Process: Those in charge of the process of handling complaints within the Party (Chair, Deputy Chair) have demonstrated a callous attitude to complaints, misleading members and the public with limited (if any) transparency; and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Proposed Changes to Bus Route 691
    Consultation on proposed changes to bus route 691 Consultation Report December 2016 1 Consultation on proposed changes to bus route 691 Consultation Report 2 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation ............................................................................................................. 2 3 Responses from members of the public ......................................................................... 3 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders .............................................. 5 Appendix A – Consultation materials .................................................................................... 7 Appendix B – List of stakeholders consulted....................................................................... 10 1 1 Introduction We recently consulted stakeholders and the public about our proposals to stop running route 691. The consultation took place between 29 June and 23 August 2016. This report explains the background to the proposal, the consultation and summarises the responses received. 1.1. Our proposals Route 691 currently runs between Richmond Road, Ham and The Hollyfield School, Surbiton. It runs one journey from Ham to The Hollyfield School in the morning with one journey from The Hollyfield School to Ham in the afternoon. Following a review and to make better use of our resources we proposed that route 691 would no longer run. There are currently around 90 trips per day made on the 691. Passengers who currently use route 691 between Kingston and The Hollyfield School would be able to use either route 281, 406 or 418 instead. Around 10-15 pupils travel from north of Kingston. They would need to use route 65 and change buses at Kingston to complete their journey. There would be no changes to routes 65, 281, 406 or 418. 2 The consultation The consultation was designed to enable us to understand local opinion about the proposed changes to route 691.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT CHAPEL, UNITED REFORM CHURCH HALL, 20 WIDMORE ROAD, BROMLEY BR1 1RY ON THURSDAY 20 OCTOBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ____________________________________________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 020 3585 4721/22 ____________________________________________________________ Time Noted: 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Ladies and gentlemen, good morning and welcome to this public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for the new parliamentary constituencies in the London region. My name is Howard Simmons. I am the Assistant Commissioner appointed by the Commission to assist them in their task of considering all the representations made. I am supported in that by two other Assistant Commissioners: Emma Davey and Richard Wald. We will be considering all the representations and putting forward recommendations as to whether or not the current set of initial proposals should be modified. I am supported today by a team of staff from the Commission led by Gerald Tessier, who is on my right. Shortly, he will be providing an outline of the Commission’s initial proposals for the new constituencies. He will also run through how you can make representations and cover some other administrative matters. Today’s hearing is scheduled to run from 10 am till 8 pm and tomorrow from 9 am until 5 pm. I should stress this is a two-day hearing, and can be only a two-day hearing.
    [Show full text]