London Assembly and All Londoners up to Date As This Develops

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Assembly and All Londoners up to Date As This Develops Appendix 1 Mayor’s Question Time – Thursday 18 June 2020 Transcript of Item 4 – Oral update to the Mayor’s Report Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Good morning, Chair. Good morning, Assembly Members. COVID-19 is the biggest challenge our city has faced since the Second World War and we are continuing to do all that we can from City Hall to prevent a catastrophic second wave of this deadly disease. One of the huge consequences is the devastating impact this had on London’s public finances, which were in good shape before the pandemic hit. Transport for London’s (TfL) income from fares has dropped by more than 90% and income from local business rates and council tax has fallen off the cliff. That is why I warned yesterday that we will be left with no choice but to make significant cuts across the Mayoral bodies unless the Government urgently acts to support local and regional authorities across the country. I would urge all Assembly Members to join me and the many mayors and local authority leaders from across the political divide who are putting pressure on the Government to do the right thing. Whatever happens, I will do what I can to protect front line services as much as possible, and it is only right that I should volunteer for an immediate pay cut and continue to not take any pension contributions in these extremely difficult circumstances. New budget guidance will be published shortly and I will keep the London Assembly and all Londoners up to date as this develops. I know millions of Londoners were horrified by the shameful scenes of violence and racism from members of the far-right over the weekend. Our police officers did a fantastic job controlling demonstrators and preventing the situation from escalating any further. I want to place on record on behalf of all Londoners my thanks and gratitude to our policemen and policewomen. More than 85 officers have been injured in the course of their duties over the last few weeks. Such violence will never be tolerated, and anyone who attacks our police or engages in acts of vandalism will always feel the full force of the law. I also, Chair, want to take this opportunity to reiterate my support for the Black Lives Matter movement. I am proud to stand with millions of people around the world raising their voices and saying loud and clear that we must end the racism and institutional discrimination that sadly still exists in our society. Can I just be clear on one thing: we must not allow any kind of equivalence to be drawn between the members of the far-right who came to our city for the sole purpose of sowing division and hatred and the supporters of Black Lives Matter, antiracists, the vast majority of whom have protested peacefully and have been excellent ambassadors for such a vital cause. I welcome the promise from the Prime Minister that the Government will look at discrimination in our public institutions, but the truth is we already know what is needed from the many Government reviews that have really been done. We do not need more delay. The time for action is now. Thank you, Chair. I have also been asked for two oral updates and with your permission I will go to them straight away. The first one is from Assembly Member [Andrew] Boff, who has asked about the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. I asked my Deputy Mayor for Culture and Creative Industries, Justine Simons OBE, and Deputy Mayor for Social Integration, Social Mobility and Community Engagement, Dr Debbie Weekes-Bernard, to urgently bring together arts, community and council leaders across the capital to create the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. The Commission will consider how we improve diversity across our public realm and how we tell a more accurate story of our city. The aim is to work in partnership with boroughs and communities to ensure our street names, squares and statues properly reflect our city’s achievements and diversity. Terms of reference for the Commission are being drafted and developed in consultation with councils, community groups and other stakeholders. Within those terms of reference, I expect that the Commission will review what currently makes up London’s public realm, further the discussion into what legacy should be celebrated, and make recommendations as part of their work to establish best practice and standards. It will be wide in scope and consider commemoration, murals, street art, street names and memorials. There will be an open call for independent members of the Commission working in partnership with councils, communities and stakeholders across the capital. In the meantime, the Local Government Association (LGA) has issued a useful advice note for its members outlining some approaches to reviewing existing statues and memorials. Chair, I have also had a request for an oral update from Assembly Member [Siân] Berry in relation to arrests made during the protest this weekend. Like me, millions of Londoners would have been disgusted by these shameful scenes of violence, desecration and racism displayed by the right-wing extremists who gathered in our city this weekend. In the face of attacks and abuse, our police did a fantastic job to control the situation and to them I want to say thank you. In total, 128 arrests have been made in connection to the disorder for a range of offences including breach of the peace, violent disorder, possession of an offensive weapon, possession of Class A drugs and being drunk and disorderly. Unfortunately, arrests also had to be made after 23 officers were injured. It is clear that far-right groups were intent on causing violence and disorder in central London. We will not tolerate violence, vandalism and attacks on our police, and perpetrators will feel the full force of the law. Navin Shah AM (Chair): I already have a list of Members who have requested that they may want to come in with supplementary questions. Can I start with Assembly Member Duvall? Len Duvall AM: Chair, I have a question later on the agenda. I do not want to abuse the position, but there are some questions arising from the Mayor’s report. I would like to ask a couple of questions. Mr Mayor, thank you very much. It is right and responsible that we take early action if we can identify problems in terms of our budget. It just comes to mind. Are we in a position where we have articulated our assessments back to central Government? Have we done it for the GLA Group and family and are we doing it with the London councils and other public services that are under financial pressure? If we have not done it, when are you able to share that with us? Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Assembly Member Duvall. Yes, we are talking regularly with the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), other departments in Government including the Prime Minister’s team, and also London councils. That includes the boroughs and also the City of London Corporation, the MPS, the London Fire Brigade (LFB), the development corporations and other partners across London. The key point to make, Assembly Member Duvall - and you will know this from previous experiences - is that we received roughly speaking £3.4 billion from a combination of business rates and council tax. There are three big issues. One is that we have spent a huge amount in dealing with COVID-19 and our response and so our expenditure has gone up, including expenditure of councils. On business rates, we know for a variety of reasons that are obvious that businesses’ pay has gone down. The Government is giving some relief to London but it does not meet the gap in relation to the business rates shortfall. Also, we know that the estimates made by councils in relation to council tax this year will fall way short because many families will now be in receipt of benefits rather than paying the full council tax. We are in conversations with the Government. One of the reasons why I was quite keen to make sure I informed Londoners about the scale of the challenge is to make sure Londoners were aware of what potentially could happen if the Government does not step in to help us. By the way, this is a challenge being felt across the country. As recently as yesterday I spoke to the Metro Nine (M9) who have similar challenges. We are speaking to the LGA, which represents a number of councils across the country. You will have seen, Assembly Member Duvall, during Prime Minister’s Questions the exchange between the Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition and the Prime Minister where [The Rt Hon] Keir Starmer [MP, Leader of the Opposition] pointed to a letter from Conservative leaders expressing their concerns about this very same issue. Len Duvall AM: Sorry, Mr Mayor, can I just come back on that. Thank you for that answer and that was very detailed, but I would like to know when we are going to see not just the technical case and the financial gap but the case for why we should get that money in this particular time. I can think of some really good reasons for why the Government should not go down the austerity route, but I am just wondering when we are going to see that case for London being made and when we can share that. It goes over and above the technical finances, “We want money to fill this gap”.
Recommended publications
  • Routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017
    Consultation on proposed changes to bus routes 289 and 455 Consultation Report July 2017 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Summary of issues raised during consultation ......................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Detailed description ........................................................................................ 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 7 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 7 2.6 What we asked ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Qataris Still Denied Their Rights in Saudi
    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 8 Nine-man Chelsea stunned INDEX DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2-5, 20 COMMENT 18, 19 REGION 6 BUSINESS 1–4, 14-16 by Qatari, Turkish fi rms 21,848.00 9,313.49 48.82 ARAB WORLD 6 CLASSIFIED 5-13 +12.00 -156.10 +0.23 INTERNATIONAL 7–17 SPORTS 1–8 sign 15 agreements Burnley +0.05% -1.65% +0.47% Latest Figures published in QATAR since 1978 SUNDAY Vol. XXXVIII No. 10544 August 13, 2017 Dhul-Qa’da 21, 1438 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals Former foreign and justice Our Say minister: Comoros move to cut Qatar ties unjustifi able O His Highness the Father Ibrahim has earlier served as Min- ister of State for Foreign Aff airs and Emir was the first head Co-operation in charge of the Arab of any Arab state to visit World and then as Minister of Justice, Comoros in charge of Public Administration of By Faisal Abdulhameed O A lot of Comorians were Islamic Aff airs and Human Rights, a al-Mudahka position he kept from May 30 2016 to agitated by the president’s July 19, 2017. Editor-in-Chief decision to sever ties with In a recent reshuffl e of the Cabinet , Ibrahim alongside two other ministers Qatar from his Juwa Party, was dismissed for The road to the their support for the cause of Qatar and Comoros and By Ahmed al-Qudah and Ayman Adly rejecting the decision of the President Doha Azali Assoumani to cut ties with Doha.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. APPENDIX 3 Letter Attachment 210720
    Transcript of Conservative G roup (London Borough of Havering) meeting held at Havering Town Hall on 03 February 2020 Speakers (in order of first speaking) - All Conservative councillors Cllr Damian White (DW) Cllr Joshua Chapman (JC) Cllr Robert Benham (RobB) Cllr Bob Perry (BP) Cllr Timothy Ryan (TR) Cllr Roger Ramsey (RR) Cllr Ray Best (RayB) Cllr Christine Vickery (CV) Other persons mentioned in audio (in order of first mention ) Andrew Blake-Herbert (Chief Executive, London Borough of Havering) (AB-H) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative MP for Romford) (AR) Cllr Darren Wise (North Havering Residents Group) (DWise) Cllr Brian Eagling (North Havering Residents Group) (BE) Julia Lopez MP (Conservative MP for Hornchurch and Upminster) (JL) Andrew Boff (Conservative Party - London Assembly Assembly Member) (ABoff) T ime on audio (mm:ss) (Paragraph breaks in text are for easier reading purposes only) Audio starts. 00:00 - 02:53 DW - "One is with the 52 councillors....(00:03 - 00:05 Inaudible) ......basically the parameters that we need. And all need to be different aspects of the Boundary Commission’s technical guidance. Instead of submitting those four to the Full Council when we decide which ones we want subject, er, us doing the amendments, Andrew (AB-H) has now agreed that we can have a Governance Committee meeting to, um, discuss the four options, pick which one we like, make any amend, recommendations and changes to it and that then goes on to Full Council as an administration amendment or a motion, so the previous one gives the officers..... (00:39 - 00:47 mostly inaudible) ......the option of going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • UKIP NEC Meeting Agenda
    - UKIP, Lexdrum House, King Charles Business Park, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ12 6UT - UKIP NEC Meeting Agenda 01/02/20 – 13.00 Union Jack Club, Sandell St, London, SE1 8UJ 1, Attendance Ian Garbutt (IG), Paul Girvan (PG), Elizabeth Jones (EJ), Marietta King (MK), Donald Mackay (DM), Joel McGuigan (JM), Pat Mountain (PatM), Pete Muswell (PeteM), Mike Shaw (MS), Freddy Vachha (FV), Hoong Wai Cheah (HW - Minutes taker), Ben Walker (BW) Apologies Paul Williams, Lawrence Webb, Neil Hamilton New members (PG) & (IG) were welcomed to the meeting. 2, Approval of Minutes Proposed by FV, seconded by PM – 5 Votes FOR, 2 Abstentions, 0 Against 3, Matters Arising Mike Shaw addressed the NEC with some questions which were answered throughout the duration of the meeting. 4, Leaders Report (PatM) (BW) (NH) & (FV) are working hard to firefight, answer emails, etc further complicated by lack of funds. (PatM) responded to (MS) ref Mark Harland issue - UKIP went to court to get permission to pay late invoice for EU election. It is the Treasurer's job to do this. Mark did not feel competent to attending court. Adam Richardson was asked to attend instead. Mark and others took steps to get Adam debarred. Adam demanded an apology for past grievances before doing this. Pat did not ever say she would attend. Mark apologised. Adam was unhappy with the sincerity of the apology. Pat asked Neil to help. Neil tried to get Adam to go. It was Mark's responsibility as Treasurer but indicated his intention to resign on 31 Dec. Mark resigned the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Excellence Recognised N Monday 5Th December, Bangor University Held a New Awards Night Focusing on Re- Searcho Excellence Within the Univer- Sity
    Bangor University Students’ Union December Issue 2016 English Language Issue No. 259 Newspaper FREE @SerenBangor seren.bangor.ac.uk CHAPECOENSE TRAGEDY MERRY CHRISTMAS! A YEAR IN MUSIC Research excellence recognised n Monday 5th December, Bangor University held a new awards night focusing on re- searchO excellence within the Univer- sity. e night was held at Pontio and shone a light on outstanding research done by teams and individuals. e Awards were devised to cel- ebrate the individual achievements of academic sta at di erent career points, including rising stars, a Doc- toral student and a Lifetime Achieve- ment Award. Awards celebrating an outstanding project or programmes within the Sciences and the Arts & Humanities and Social Sciences and for an International project were also presented. Professor John G Hughes, Vice- Chancellor of Bangor University said: “Research is an integral part of our teaching and a passion of our sta . Our research is having a major im- pact on people’s lives, both locally and globally. ese Awards are a fantastic opportunity for us to recognise and highlight the world-leading research that we have here.” Professor John Simpson of the School of Ocean Sciences won the Universi- ties rst Lifetime Achievement Award for his career that has spanned over Receiving the Lifetime Achievement Award Professor John Simpson (middle) with Professor John G Hughes, Vice-Chancellor (left) half a century with the University. His and Professor Jo Rycroft-Malone, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Research & Impact (right) work has consistently in uenced the eld of physical oceanography and has cussed on bar-headed geese, whose pean Travellers to Wales 1750-2010, colleagues and collaborators, for mak- award and very privileged to have had helped establish Bangor University as migration pattern takes them across e International Research Excellence ing Bangor University such a support- the opportunity to take on this project, a global leader in marine turbulence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vote for Confidence?
    DR Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority February 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen‟s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper Elections Review Working Group Members Andrew Boff (Chairman) Conservative Jennette Arnold Labour Len Duvall Labour Darren Johnson Green Steve O‟Connell Conservative Caroline Pidgeon Liberal Democrat Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 8 1 Introduction 10 2 Issues to be reviewed 12 3 Queues and people being unable to vote 15 4 Administrative challenges: Voter registration and postal votes 26 5 The Count 33 6 Learning lessons from the May 2010 elections in London 35 Appendix 2 Individual Registration 39 Appendix 3 Orders and translations 40 6 Foreword We pride ourselves that democracy is in this country's DNA. There is a danger that that pride can lead to complacency. The elections in May 2010 were a reminder that we should constantly review the mechanisms that are in place to enable the citizen's right to vote. The 2010 elections will be remembered for the crowds outside the polling stations. In Hackney and Islington, those crowds were waiting patiently to vote but hundreds were unable to exercise that fundamental right when the polls closed. In other parts of London, those crowds were last minute canvassers, trying to cajole voters into supporting, or not supporting, particular candidates .
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5
    Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 12 October 2017 The cost of Brexit Question No: 2017/4095 Fiona Twycross How much has the cost of living in London increased since the Brexit referendum? Oral response Refusing to Re-License Uber Question No: 2017/3896 Andrew Boff How much influence did you have on the decision not to re-license Uber? Oral response New housing policies Question No: 2017/3938 Sian Berry How will the new measures announced in your draft Housing Strategy preserve and increase genuinely affordable homes in London? Oral response London's Population Growth Question No: 2017/4102 David Kurten Does the Mayor consider that a projected increase in London's population to 12 million by 2050 is unsustainable? Oral response Modern Day Slavery Question No: 2017/3996 Jennette Arnold What measures are the Metropolitan Police taking towards ending Modern Day Slavery in London and how many prosecutions have been undertaken by the Met and CPS? Oral response Page 1 Borough mergers and response times Question No: 2017/3917 Steve O'Connell How will you ensure that response times in the new merged borough commands remain at satisfactory levels? Oral response London Sustainability and Transformation Plans Question No: 2017/4065 Joanne McCartney The King's Fund and Nuffield Trust's recent independent report found that London's Sustainability and Transformation Plans to reduce hospital use and cut the number of beds on the scale proposed were "not credible". Do you share this assessment? What more needs to be done to ensure our NHS can continue to deliver high quality health services? Oral response Disproportionality in BAME individuals in the CJS Question No: 2017/3995 Jennette Arnold In David Lammy's recent review into the treatment of, and outcomes for BAME individuals in the Criminal Justice System, he made a recommendation for you to review the Trident Matrix to examine the way information is gathered, verified, stored and shared with specific reference to BAME disproportionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Inclusive Communities: Practical and Local Initiatives to Promote Migrant Integration"
    TRANSCRIPT "BUILDING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: PRACTICAL AND LOCAL INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE MIGRANT INTEGRATION" A Conversation With Simon Woolley, Jonathan Portes, Alan Broadbent, Dan Silver, Karen Bellamy, Andrew Boff, Ratna Omidvar and Cynthia Masiyiwa Moderator: Rob Berkley ANNOUNCER: You're listening to a recording of the Open Society Foundations, working to build vibrant and tolerant democracies worldwide. Visit us at OpenSocietyFoundations.org. ROB BERKLEY: My name's Rob Berkley, I'm director of the Runnymede Trust. I'm one of the organizations-- that's come together to put on this event along with (UNINTEL PHRASE) and the Open Society Foundations. So, I'm-- without further ado, I wanna hand over to Simon Woolley. He's director of the opera-- of Operation Black Vote. Welcome. SIMON WOOLLEY: Thank you. Thank you-- thank you very much. Good-- good afternoon, everyone. Actually, I have the impossible task of replacing the irreplaceable. I'm replacing Nazia Hussain who is the director of At Home in Europe here at the Open Society Foundation. My role here, with the foundation, is the chair of At Home in Europe. And we want to warmly welcome to our establishment, to our premises, and to this program which we think is vitally important. We are very happy to be partners, but not least because we think that working TRANSCRIPT: 2 B UILDING INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: PRACTICAL AND LOCAL INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE MIGRA NT INTEGRATION together is best, it ensures that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. We learn from each other. We support each other. And-- we achieve a great deal more-- together.
    [Show full text]
  • For Brexit and Beyond
    For Brexit and Beyond For Brexit and Beyond Introduction UKIP is the party of Brexit and beyond. We have fought to leave the European Union for 27 years, and we continue to insist that the UK has a clean-break exit from the European Union. The treaty agreed between Boris and the EU will keep us shackled to Brussels. If Parliament ratifies it, we will wake up on 1st February having left the EU Commission and Parliament but still locked inside the Single Market, Customs Union, European Court of Justice, Common Agricultural Policy, Common Fisheries Policy, European Defence Agency, Common Security and Defence Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and all of its other institutions and systems, while becoming liable to pay the EU a £39,000,000,000 bill. That is not leaving the EU. We must take back full and immediate control of our sovereignty, laws, money, borders, trade and fishing waters on 31st January 2020 – no more delays! UKIP also has a domestic agenda, which is of vital importance to the future. We are proud to have developed a full common-sense manifesto which combines our founding libertarian principles with populism and authentic conservatism. In particular, we stand for free speech, free markets, financial responsibility and traditional British values. UKIP is the only party that will cut net immigration to below 10,000 net per annum and protect the countryside from rampant ‘development’. We will work to uphold freedom of expression and end the suffocating culture of political correctness, while supporting a vibrant low-tax economy where businesses can thrive and take advantage of the great opportunities our nation will have after we leave the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Proposal: Route P5 Extension to Battersea Power Station
    Bus service proposal: route P5 extension to Battersea Power Station Consultation Report March 2018, updated October 2018 Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................ 3 2. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 3. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 4. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 11 5. Summary of consultation responses ................................................................. 15 6. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 29 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments ............................................................. 30 Appendix B: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 37 Appendix C: List of stakeholders consulted ............................................................... 51 Appendix D: Petitions ................................................................................................ 53 2 1. Executive summary Between 26 June and 20 August 2017, we consulted on proposals to extend bus route P5 to Battersea Power Station. We received 196 responses to the consultation (including 12 responses from stakeholders). Of these: 49 per cent strongly or partially opposed the proposal
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov / QMUL Survey Results Sample Size: 1192 adults in London Fieldwork: 29th March - 1st April 2021 Mayoral Voting Intention Westminster VI Shaun Sadiq Luisa Siân Mandu Peter David Laurence Brian Don’t Would Lib Total Other Refused Con Lab Bailey Khan Porritt Berry Reid Gammons Kurten Fox Rose know not vote Dem Weighted Sample 1192 201 378 58 74 11 9 1 34 26 15 258 71 56 257 415 68 Unweighted Sample 1192 192 429 53 84 16 7 2 34 18 17 241 53 46 236 469 73 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16-19 29 March- Nov 1 April HEADLINE MAYORAL VOTING INTENTION Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 1 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 30 26 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 1 Sadiq Khan 51 47 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 83 39 Luisa Porritt 4 7 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 36 Siân Berry 9 9 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 14 Mandu Reid 1 1 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 Peter Gammons 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 David Kurten - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laurence Fox - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 7 Brian Rose - 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Some other candidate 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 2 0 0 Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 2 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 36 34 100 0 14 12 40 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 91 3 10 Sadiq Khan 64 66 0 100 86 88 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 9 97 90 1 © 2021 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]