DOCSLIB.ORG

Bus Service Proposal: Route P5 Extension to Battersea Power Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bus Service Proposal: Route P5 Extension to Battersea Power Station Bus service proposal: route P5 extension to Battersea Power Station Consultation Report March 2018, updated October 2018 Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................ 3 2. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 3. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 4. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 11 5. Summary of consultation responses ................................................................. 15 6. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 29 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments ............................................................. 30 Appendix B: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 37 Appendix C: List of stakeholders consulted ............................................................... 51 Appendix D: Petitions ................................................................................................ 53 2 1. Executive summary Between 26 June and 20 August 2017, we consulted on proposals to extend bus route P5 to Battersea Power Station. We received 196 responses to the consultation (including 12 responses from stakeholders). Of these: 49 per cent strongly or partially opposed the proposal to extend route P5 to Battersea Power Station, 48 per cent strongly or partially supported the change, while three per cent neither supported nor opposed the proposal 46 per cent strongly or partially opposed the proposal to shorten existing on- street parking, 40 per cent strongly or partially supported the change, while 10 per cent neither supported nor opposed the proposal. Four per cent did not answer 53 per cent strongly or partially opposed the proposal to convert on-street parking to footway parking, 31 per cent strongly or partially supported the change, while 12 per cent neither supported nor opposed the proposal. Four per cent did not answer 48 per cent strongly or partially supported the proposal to install traffic calming at the junction of Thessaly Road with Ascalon Street, 36 per cent strongly or partially opposed the change, while 10 per cent neither supported nor opposed the proposal. Five per cent did not answer 1.1 Summary of issues raised during consultation Below is a summary of some of the more prominent issues raised during consultation. Our detailed analysis of responses is included in Appendix A. The existing network is sufficient for local residents and the P5 extension is unnecessary due to the Northern Line extension Concern regarding safety of children in the area Concern that enforcement would not be possible Concern regarding an increase in noise and air pollution if the proposal was to go ahead Concern regarding the removal of parking 1.2 Petitions and campaigns Two petitions were submitted to the consultation, both opposed the proposed extension to route P5. For full details, including how they were included in our analysis, go to Section 5.6. 3 1.3 Next steps After considering all of the responses to the consultation, we have decided to put all of our proposals on hold. We will have further discussions with London Borough of Wandsworth to see if the safety issues raised can be mitigated. More detail is provided in Section 6. 4 2. About the proposals 2.1 Introduction The London bus network is kept under regular review. As part of this, we develop proposals for changes to services. Consultation was undertaken on a proposal to extend route P5 to Battersea Power Station. 2.2 Purpose As part of the Mayor’s Opportunity Area Planning Framework, Nine Elms including Battersea Power Station has been identified as an area for major redevelopment. This development has commenced and will be continuing in the coming years, boasting approximately 40 major development with new residential and office units, a new shopping district and new London Underground stations. It is planned to construct 20,000 new homes and create 25,000 new jobs between now and 2027. An extension to bus route P5 was identified within the bus strategy for Vauxhall Nine Elms Battersea (VNEB) Opportunity Area to address increasing demand in the area. This would create direct connections from areas of Lambeth to new jobs and retail services. 2.3 Detailed description We proposed extending the route from Thessaly Road via Battersea Park Road and Kirtling Street to Battersea Power Station. Towards Elephant & Castle the route would run from Battersea Power Station via Kirtling Street, Battersea Park Road, Thessaly Road, Ascalon Street, Stewart’s Road and Wandsworth Road to current line of route. Thessaly Road would be open to buses and cyclists only. Works required to facilitate the extension of route P5 In order to facilitate the extension via Thessaly Road, we would need to make alterations to the highway to enable buses to use the road. The following changes would be required: The existing on-street parking bay opposite the current Santander cycle docking station would be shortened by 20 metres to provide a passing place The existing on-street parking bay outside 1- 65 Thessaly House would need to be converted to part footway parking 5 The existing on-street parking bay outside 182 - 192 Thessaly Road would need to be shortened by 5 metres to provide a passing place The existing on-street parking bay opposite 158 - 176 Thessaly Road would need to be converted to footway parking to create space The existing on-street parking outside 160 - 176 Thessaly Road would need to be shorted by 20 metres to provide a passing place The existing on-street parking bay opposite 160 Thessaly Road would need to be removed to provide a passing place The surface would be slightly raised at the junction of Thessaly Road with Ascalon Street to provide a traffic calming measure Some footway realignment work would be required on the junction where Thessaly Road meets Ascalon Street to provide sufficient space for passing buses The existing tree on the south east corner of Battersea Park Road would need to be removed to allow visibility for buses and cyclists turning left from Battersea Park Road The planting at the northern end of Thessaly Road would need removal to open up the road for access Thessaly Road would need to be opened up for buses and cyclists only 6 3. About the consultation 3.1 Purpose The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the change/s for the proposals To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions 3.2 Potential outcomes The potential outcomes of the consultation are: Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide to proceed with the scheme as set out in the consultation Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we modify the proposals in response to issues raised and proceed with a revised scheme Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide not to proceed with the scheme Our conclusion and next steps are set out in Section 6. 3.3 Who we consulted We sought the views of customers currently using route P5, as well as local businesses in the Battersea area. We also consulted stakeholders including the London Boroughs of Lambeth and Wandsworth, London TravelWatch, local politicians, and local resident and community groups. A full list of the stakeholders consulted can be found in Appendix C. 3.4 Dates and duration This was an eight week consultation which ran between 26 June and 20 August 2017. A consultation on proposals for the road layout on Nine Elms Lane and Battersea Park Road was run concurrently, the results of which are reported separately. For more information please visit tfl.gov.uk/nine-elms-lane 7 3.5 What we asked Our survey comprised several closed questions asking people to select an answer that matched their level of support for or against the extension to the P5 bus route and different aspects of it. We gave respondents the chance to provide comments on the proposals and also the quality of the consultation materials. For the complete list of questions we asked about the extension to P5 bus route proposals please visit Appendix B. 3.6 Methods of responding People were able to respond to the consultation through the following channels: By answering the questions in the survey on our consultation website at tfl.gov.uk/p5-extension By sending a letter to FREEPOST TfL CONSULTATIONS By emailing: [email protected]. The Consultation Team also answered questions from members of the public and stakeholders via email By phoning our Customer Services Team, which had been briefed on the proposals and were available to answer questions and take responses from members of the public. When our telephone operatives were unable to answer questions immediately, these were forwarded to the Consultation Team, and were answered subsequently by email or telephone By leaving comments and/or filling in questionnaires at one of the public drop- in sessions (or posting a questionnaire to the address above) Through
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Membership of the Independent Labour Party, 1904–10
    DEI AN HOP KIN THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE INDEPENDENT LABOUR PARTY, 1904-10: A SPATIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS E. P. Thompson expressed succinctly the prevailing orthodoxy about the origins of the Independent Labour Party when he wrote, in his homage to Tom Maguire, that "the ILP grew from bottom up".1 From what little evidence has been available, it has been argued that the ILP was essentially a provincial party, which was created from the fusion of local political groups concentrated mainly on an axis lying across the North of England. An early report from the General Secretary of the party described Lancashire and Yorkshire as the strongholds of the movement, and subsequent historical accounts have supported this view.2 The evidence falls into three categories. In the first place labour historians have often relied on the sparse and often imperfect memoirs of early labour and socialist leaders. While the central figures of the movement have been reticent in their memoirs, very little literature of any kind has emerged from among the ordinary members of the party, and as a result this has often been a poor source. The official papers of the ILP have been generally more satisfactory. The in- evitable gaps in the annual reports of the party can be filled to some extent from party newspapers, both local and national. There is a formality, nevertheless, about official transactions which reduces their value. Minute books reveal little about the members. Finally, it is possible to cull some information from a miscellany of other sources; newspapers, electoral statistics, parliamentary debates and reports, and sometimes the memoirs of individuals whose connection 1 "Homage to Tom Maguire", in: Essays in Labour History, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Persons Nominated, Notice of Poll and Situation of Polling Stations
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE OF POLL AND SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Election of a Member of Parliament for Vauxhall Borough Constituency Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Member of Parliament for Vauxhall Borough will be held on Thursday 12 December 2019, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. One Member of Parliament is to be elected. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Names of Signatories Names of Signatories Name of Description (if Home Address Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Candidate any) Assentors Assentors Assentors BOND (Address in the Green Party Keane Michael J(+) Sheppeck Neil A(++) (+) (++) (+) (++) Jacqueline Rose Vauxhall Picton-Howell King Robert A constituency) Indar H Wasserman Milo J G Argyropoulou Iris Prentis Roger A Wasserman Hemus Nicholas Nicola V Naylor Benjamin W BOOL (Address in the The Conservative Harmston-Gething Mawdsley Barr Stuart D(+) Gibson Best (+) (++) Sarah Anne-Marie Cities of London Party Candidate Joshua J(+) Paul M(++) Dyson Edward W Phoebe A L E(++) and Westminster Frost David Jefferson Michael Roberts Lee J Treherne Pollock constituency) Sunderland John Farrington Best Keith L Alexander B Harrison Edward J Rachael A E Tomlinson David S Trennery Thomas G Gibson Best Mawdsley Emma L Prain Alastair J Ophelia G Macgregor
    [Show full text]
  • No 379, July/August 2015
    The Clapham Society Newsletter Issue 379 July/August 2015 Clapham Leaf Club The Club’s Grand Finale is on Saturday 4 July at Venn Street If you would like to go to the Summer Party on Market (10 am – 4 pm). Clapham Leaf Club is a project designed Thursday 9 July, and have not yet bought a ticket to enable pupils of the Clapham and Larkhall Collaborative there may still be one available. Check with Alyson primary schools (Allen Edwards, Clapham Manor, Heathbrook, Wilson on 020 7622 6360. Larkhall, Macaulay CE) to learn all aspects of growing their own food from preparing the soil using organic matter, to sowing seeds We have no regular meetings at Omnibus during July and and culturing their crops which will be harvested and sold as fruit August. The next meeting will be on Monday 21 September and vegetables or used in a cuisine and cooked and sold at the when Nobby Clark, photographer will talk about his work Market every year in July. as production photographer for many major theatre directors Now in its fifth year, the Grand Finale will show the great and for newspapers. Full details are on our website at efforts made by the schools over the past two terms. Each year claphamsociety.com/clapsocevents.html. Larkhall Primary deliver the best hanging baskets along with a Meanwhile we have the following walks during the summer: variety of fresh berries from their allotment and freshly laid eggs from their hen and duck pen! Heathbrook Primary will be showing Sunday 19 July their horticultural skills selling fresh lettuces, strawberries, spring Beware of the Flowers, ’Cos I’m Sure They’re Going to Get onions, peas and tomatoes and Allen Edwards Primary have been You – Yeah! A tour of Clapham Common looking at plants busy planting potatoes, carrots, onions, runner beans, tomatoes and as sources of medicines and poisons, and how we have used courgettes in March and radishes and rocket just before half term.
    [Show full text]
  • Qataris Still Denied Their Rights in Saudi
    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 8 Nine-man Chelsea stunned INDEX DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2-5, 20 COMMENT 18, 19 REGION 6 BUSINESS 1–4, 14-16 by Qatari, Turkish fi rms 21,848.00 9,313.49 48.82 ARAB WORLD 6 CLASSIFIED 5-13 +12.00 -156.10 +0.23 INTERNATIONAL 7–17 SPORTS 1–8 sign 15 agreements Burnley +0.05% -1.65% +0.47% Latest Figures published in QATAR since 1978 SUNDAY Vol. XXXVIII No. 10544 August 13, 2017 Dhul-Qa’da 21, 1438 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals Former foreign and justice Our Say minister: Comoros move to cut Qatar ties unjustifi able O His Highness the Father Ibrahim has earlier served as Min- ister of State for Foreign Aff airs and Emir was the first head Co-operation in charge of the Arab of any Arab state to visit World and then as Minister of Justice, Comoros in charge of Public Administration of By Faisal Abdulhameed O A lot of Comorians were Islamic Aff airs and Human Rights, a al-Mudahka position he kept from May 30 2016 to agitated by the president’s July 19, 2017. Editor-in-Chief decision to sever ties with In a recent reshuffl e of the Cabinet , Ibrahim alongside two other ministers Qatar from his Juwa Party, was dismissed for The road to the their support for the cause of Qatar and Comoros and By Ahmed al-Qudah and Ayman Adly rejecting the decision of the President Doha Azali Assoumani to cut ties with Doha.
    [Show full text]
  • UKIP NEC Meeting Agenda
    - UKIP, Lexdrum House, King Charles Business Park, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ12 6UT - UKIP NEC Meeting Agenda 01/02/20 – 13.00 Union Jack Club, Sandell St, London, SE1 8UJ 1, Attendance Ian Garbutt (IG), Paul Girvan (PG), Elizabeth Jones (EJ), Marietta King (MK), Donald Mackay (DM), Joel McGuigan (JM), Pat Mountain (PatM), Pete Muswell (PeteM), Mike Shaw (MS), Freddy Vachha (FV), Hoong Wai Cheah (HW - Minutes taker), Ben Walker (BW) Apologies Paul Williams, Lawrence Webb, Neil Hamilton New members (PG) & (IG) were welcomed to the meeting. 2, Approval of Minutes Proposed by FV, seconded by PM – 5 Votes FOR, 2 Abstentions, 0 Against 3, Matters Arising Mike Shaw addressed the NEC with some questions which were answered throughout the duration of the meeting. 4, Leaders Report (PatM) (BW) (NH) & (FV) are working hard to firefight, answer emails, etc further complicated by lack of funds. (PatM) responded to (MS) ref Mark Harland issue - UKIP went to court to get permission to pay late invoice for EU election. It is the Treasurer's job to do this. Mark did not feel competent to attending court. Adam Richardson was asked to attend instead. Mark and others took steps to get Adam debarred. Adam demanded an apology for past grievances before doing this. Pat did not ever say she would attend. Mark apologised. Adam was unhappy with the sincerity of the apology. Pat asked Neil to help. Neil tried to get Adam to go. It was Mark's responsibility as Treasurer but indicated his intention to resign on 31 Dec. Mark resigned the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Excellence Recognised N Monday 5Th December, Bangor University Held a New Awards Night Focusing on Re- Searcho Excellence Within the Univer- Sity
    Bangor University Students’ Union December Issue 2016 English Language Issue No. 259 Newspaper FREE @SerenBangor seren.bangor.ac.uk CHAPECOENSE TRAGEDY MERRY CHRISTMAS! A YEAR IN MUSIC Research excellence recognised n Monday 5th December, Bangor University held a new awards night focusing on re- searchO excellence within the Univer- sity. e night was held at Pontio and shone a light on outstanding research done by teams and individuals. e Awards were devised to cel- ebrate the individual achievements of academic sta at di erent career points, including rising stars, a Doc- toral student and a Lifetime Achieve- ment Award. Awards celebrating an outstanding project or programmes within the Sciences and the Arts & Humanities and Social Sciences and for an International project were also presented. Professor John G Hughes, Vice- Chancellor of Bangor University said: “Research is an integral part of our teaching and a passion of our sta . Our research is having a major im- pact on people’s lives, both locally and globally. ese Awards are a fantastic opportunity for us to recognise and highlight the world-leading research that we have here.” Professor John Simpson of the School of Ocean Sciences won the Universi- ties rst Lifetime Achievement Award for his career that has spanned over Receiving the Lifetime Achievement Award Professor John Simpson (middle) with Professor John G Hughes, Vice-Chancellor (left) half a century with the University. His and Professor Jo Rycroft-Malone, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Research & Impact (right) work has consistently in uenced the eld of physical oceanography and has cussed on bar-headed geese, whose pean Travellers to Wales 1750-2010, colleagues and collaborators, for mak- award and very privileged to have had helped establish Bangor University as migration pattern takes them across e International Research Excellence ing Bangor University such a support- the opportunity to take on this project, a global leader in marine turbulence.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5
    Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 12 October 2017 The cost of Brexit Question No: 2017/4095 Fiona Twycross How much has the cost of living in London increased since the Brexit referendum? Oral response Refusing to Re-License Uber Question No: 2017/3896 Andrew Boff How much influence did you have on the decision not to re-license Uber? Oral response New housing policies Question No: 2017/3938 Sian Berry How will the new measures announced in your draft Housing Strategy preserve and increase genuinely affordable homes in London? Oral response London's Population Growth Question No: 2017/4102 David Kurten Does the Mayor consider that a projected increase in London's population to 12 million by 2050 is unsustainable? Oral response Modern Day Slavery Question No: 2017/3996 Jennette Arnold What measures are the Metropolitan Police taking towards ending Modern Day Slavery in London and how many prosecutions have been undertaken by the Met and CPS? Oral response Page 1 Borough mergers and response times Question No: 2017/3917 Steve O'Connell How will you ensure that response times in the new merged borough commands remain at satisfactory levels? Oral response London Sustainability and Transformation Plans Question No: 2017/4065 Joanne McCartney The King's Fund and Nuffield Trust's recent independent report found that London's Sustainability and Transformation Plans to reduce hospital use and cut the number of beds on the scale proposed were "not credible". Do you share this assessment? What more needs to be done to ensure our NHS can continue to deliver high quality health services? Oral response Disproportionality in BAME individuals in the CJS Question No: 2017/3995 Jennette Arnold In David Lammy's recent review into the treatment of, and outcomes for BAME individuals in the Criminal Justice System, he made a recommendation for you to review the Trident Matrix to examine the way information is gathered, verified, stored and shared with specific reference to BAME disproportionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for New Members – 2018 Edition
    Guide for new members – 2018 Edition 1 | P a g e Foreword by the chair Dear Friend, Welcome to Vauxhall Constituency Labour Party (CLP). We are a very active and vibrant CLP where all members have the opportunity to make a contribution and support the objectives of the Labour Party. It is up to you how much of a contribution you make – you can contribute by coming along to your local branch meeting and airing your views, by joining our regular campaigns sessions on the doorstep or by coming to one of the social events that are run by the CLP throughout the year. Whether you are a member who has recently joined the Party or this CLP, or someone who has been a member for several years, we hope this guide will provide you with all you need to know to make the most of being a member of the Labour Party in Vauxhall. As always, we are keen to hear from you and would welcome suggestions and ideas as to how we can encourage more people to join and participate in the activities of the CLP - please do get in touch! Kind regards, Emily Wallace Chair, Vauxhall Constituency Labour Party Contents A bit about Vauxhall Constituency ......................................................................................................................... 3 Local party organisation ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Getting involved ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2 | P a g e A bit about Vauxhall Constituency The Vauxhall seat has existed since 1950 and takes in a slice of inner South London in an inverted wedge shape. The northern and north-eastern boundary of the seat is the Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Matters Summary Contents Background and Context
    2019 Community Matters Summary Contents Background and context .............................................................................................................................2 The application process ..............................................................................................................................5 Project timeline ...........................................................................................................................................6 Five projects funded ...................................................................................................................................1 Black Families Education Support Group: How do young people who attend supplementary school contribute to the community?................................................................................................................1 Creativity Works: Being Creative: A research project that explores the impact of arts-based peer-led support groups. .......................................................................................................................................3 Transition Larkhall: How do parents take their children to school and why do they choose to travel that way? ................................................................................................................................................4 Triumph over Phobia: Investigating the factors that affect whether people with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) seek therapy or not. ...................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • For Brexit and Beyond
    For Brexit and Beyond For Brexit and Beyond Introduction UKIP is the party of Brexit and beyond. We have fought to leave the European Union for 27 years, and we continue to insist that the UK has a clean-break exit from the European Union. The treaty agreed between Boris and the EU will keep us shackled to Brussels. If Parliament ratifies it, we will wake up on 1st February having left the EU Commission and Parliament but still locked inside the Single Market, Customs Union, European Court of Justice, Common Agricultural Policy, Common Fisheries Policy, European Defence Agency, Common Security and Defence Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and all of its other institutions and systems, while becoming liable to pay the EU a £39,000,000,000 bill. That is not leaving the EU. We must take back full and immediate control of our sovereignty, laws, money, borders, trade and fishing waters on 31st January 2020 – no more delays! UKIP also has a domestic agenda, which is of vital importance to the future. We are proud to have developed a full common-sense manifesto which combines our founding libertarian principles with populism and authentic conservatism. In particular, we stand for free speech, free markets, financial responsibility and traditional British values. UKIP is the only party that will cut net immigration to below 10,000 net per annum and protect the countryside from rampant ‘development’. We will work to uphold freedom of expression and end the suffocating culture of political correctness, while supporting a vibrant low-tax economy where businesses can thrive and take advantage of the great opportunities our nation will have after we leave the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov / QMUL Survey Results Sample Size: 1192 adults in London Fieldwork: 29th March - 1st April 2021 Mayoral Voting Intention Westminster VI Shaun Sadiq Luisa Siân Mandu Peter David Laurence Brian Don’t Would Lib Total Other Refused Con Lab Bailey Khan Porritt Berry Reid Gammons Kurten Fox Rose know not vote Dem Weighted Sample 1192 201 378 58 74 11 9 1 34 26 15 258 71 56 257 415 68 Unweighted Sample 1192 192 429 53 84 16 7 2 34 18 17 241 53 46 236 469 73 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16-19 29 March- Nov 1 April HEADLINE MAYORAL VOTING INTENTION Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 1 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 30 26 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 1 Sadiq Khan 51 47 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 83 39 Luisa Porritt 4 7 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 36 Siân Berry 9 9 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 14 Mandu Reid 1 1 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 Peter Gammons 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 David Kurten - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laurence Fox - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 7 Brian Rose - 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Some other candidate 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 2 0 0 Mayoral Voting Intention - Round 2 [Weighted by likelihood to vote in mayoral election, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Shaun Bailey 36 34 100 0 14 12 40 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 91 3 10 Sadiq Khan 64 66 0 100 86 88 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 9 97 90 1 © 2021 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report November 2018
    Proposed Changes to bus routes 224 and 440 Consultation report November 2018 1 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 4 Summary of issues raised during consultation……………………………………………3 Next steps …………………………………………………………………………………….3. 1 About the proposals.................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………4 1.2 Purpose…………………………………………………………………………………………..4 1.3 Detailed description ……………………………………………………………………………5 1.3.1 Route 440 extension to Wembley……………………………………………………….5 1.3.2 Route 224 …………………………………………………………………………………..6 1.3.3 Map of proposed changes…………………………………………………………………6 2 About the consultation ................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose………………………………………………………………………………………….7 2.2 Potential outcome………………………………………………………………………………7 2.3 Who we consulted and how………………………………………………………………….7 2.4 Dates and duration ………………………………………………………………………………7 2.5 What we asked ………………………………………………………………………………….8 2.6 Methods of responding ………………………………………………………………………….8 2.7 Consultation material and publicity ……………………………………………………………...8 2.7.1 Website………………………………………………………………………………………..8 2.7.2 Letters and/or leaflets ………………………………………………………………………8 2.7.3 Emails to public………………………………………………………………………………9 2.7.4 Emails to stakeholders………………………………………………………………………9 2.7.5 On-site advertising ………………………………………………………………………….9
    [Show full text]