Breast Aware FULL Case Study.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Breast Aware FULL Case Study.Pdf Breast Aware Overview Topic: This project, which was jointly funded by NHS Cancer Tameside and Glossop and Tameside Organisation: Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC), aimed to increase early cancer detection and reduce late NHS Tameside and Glossop; Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council presentations and death rates of breast cancer Location: by encouraging women aged 35 to 50 to be breast aware. Tameside (North West) Dates: Following an extensive scoping stage, a January 2008 to April 2010 strategy was developed that incorporated Website: communication, community-based and service- www.breastaware.net led initiatives. Interventions were piloted Contact: between February and April 2010 in Ashton Gideon Smith (Consultant in Public Health Hurst, which is one of the most deprived Medicine); Debbie Bishop (Head of Health communities in Tameside and has particularly Improvement) low breast cancer survival rates. Email: [email protected]; Key results [email protected] Telephone: Increased awareness of the range of breast 0161 342 3358 cancer symptoms to look out for and confidence in how to self-examine Disappointingly, the campaign did not achieve an increase in women examining their breasts at least once a month (as recommended by the NHS) 40 per cent awareness of the campaign, which made women clearer about what is normal for them and changes to look for The well-women event was the most well attended community event the Primary Care Trust/Council had ever held in the area The campaign prompted other positive health behaviours, such as exercise ShowCase │ Breast Aware 1 Care Trust (PCT) to understand and act on real insight, rather than to continue doing what had always been done, and social marketing offered a way of managing this new approach. Chosen as 1 of 10 social marketing learning In line with the rest of England, breast cancer is demonstration sites, the project received free the most common cause of death from cancer social marketing guidance from a member of amongst women in Tameside and Glossop. The NSMC team, as well as funding for Although the incidence of breast cancer in the independent outcome evaluation to be region is no higher than the national average, conducted by the London School of Hygiene survival rates are lower due, in part, to late and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). presentation. Early detection of breast cancer can lead to simpler, more effective treatment The project was initiated by the Associate and improvement in survival rates. The NHS Director of Health Improvement, with £18,000 Breast Cancer Screening Programme provides from the public health improvement budget. free screening every 3 years to women aged However, due to absence from long-term between 50 and 70. However, breast screening illness, plus staffing shortages from uptake in NHS Tameside and Glossop restructuring within the PCT, the project lacked (NHST&G) was showing a downward trend and dedicated local resource to push it through in as at 31 March 2007, coverage of women aged the early stage. The project was subsequently 53 to 70 in NHST&G was just 61.3 per cent, picked up by the PCT cancer lead (a consultant compared to 73.8 per cent in England. in public health medicine), who was able to enlist the support of a colleague who held a Whilst breast screening programmes are an joint commissioning post across the integrated important method of detecting cancer, self- Council and PCT Health Improvement Teams. awareness and understanding of what clinical Recognising the initial funding was not signs to look for also have an important role to sufficient to scope, design and implement an play. In 1991, the Department of Health effective project, they aligned their funding pots England (DH) abandoned systematic breast for preventative activities to boost the budget self-examination and replaced it with a policy for the project to £55,000 (excluding that encourages women to be breast aware evaluation). With this funding, a social from age 18. This has been encapsulated by marketing agency was commissioned to the NHS‟s breast awareness five-point code: provide dedicated project management support and deliver the scoping and development work. 1. Know what feels normal for you 2. Look and feel 3. Know what changes to look for 4. Report any changes without delay 5. Attend full breast screening if aged 50 or over Project initiation and funding To increase early cancer detection and survival rates, NHST&G approached The NSMC to initiate a social marketing pilot project to increase breast awareness in women aged 35 to 50. There was a desire within the Primary ShowCase │ Breast Aware 2 Project aims Desk-based research was carried out in The short-term aim of the project was to summer 2008 to provide an overview and increase the number of women aged 35 to 50 analysis of existing secondary research and in Ashton Hurst ward who are aware of their what was known from the evidence base of breasts and who examine them regularly. social marketing and other work relating to breast awareness, cancer and screening. The Longer-term aims of the project were to research focused on gathering information increase: about the target audience, current UK policy and examples of good practice. However, the The speed at which women report an evidence base around breast awareness, abnormality to their GP particularly among women aged under 50, was The number of women who attend breast scant. Research that did exist suggested that screening from aged 50 breast awareness is affected by a host of The number of GPs, practice nurses and psychographic factors, including self-efficacy, community workers who routinely and confidence, body image and embarrassment. systematically inform, encourage and support women to be breast aware To establish a baseline of local knowledge, awareness and behaviour around breast Target audience awareness, LSHTM carried out a street survey The target audience was initially defined as in summer 2009 in Ashton Hurst (intervention women aged 35 to 50, living in the top 10 per area) and South Denton (comparison area), cent of deprived communities in Tameside and which had been matched for age structure, Glossop. This age group was targeted to deprivation and rural/urban mix. A face-to-face increase the possibility of early detection in questionnaire was implemented with 185 younger women who are not yet eligible for free women aged between 35 and 50 across the breast screening, and to increase interest in intervention and control areas. and uptake of breast screening once they reach 50. Late presentation is a particular issue To further explore local women‟s knowledge, amongst more deprived women. The Ashton behaviour and attitudes around breast Hurst ward was selected as the pilot area since awareness, and their barriers and motivators it is one of the most deprived communities in for being breast aware, primary research was the PCT and both breast screening uptake and conducted with women aged 35 to 50 living in breast cancer survival rates are particularly Ashton Hurst and South Denton. This involved low. 2 focus groups with 6 to 8 members of the public, and 15 women were interviewed, either individually or as part of a friendship pair. Twenty in-depth interviews were also conducted with key stakeholders (such as GPs, nurses, and a range of other health professionals and community workers) to explore if and how service improvements could Research be made to increase breast awareness. The scoping stage of the project comprised desk-based research, primary research with Insights the target audience and interviews with key The findings from the street survey and stakeholders. qualitative research were largely consistent: women were aware of the dangers of breast ShowCase │ Breast Aware 3 cancer, but few regularly examined their Having a fatalistic view breasts or felt confident they were doing it Not wanting to bother their GP correctly and knew what changes to look for, other than lumps. Nurses seemed to have an accurate understanding of what it meant to be breast While women were unlikely to visit a mobile aware and reported giving lifestyle advice, unit or stand, or attend workshops, they were including about being breast aware. GPs amenable to receiving health messages in the seemed to have a more basic understanding community from non-health professionals and and did not routinely offer lifestyle advice. in non-health settings, such as in community Health trainers also had a potential role to play centres or the workplace. Poster advertising, as they engage directly with people to offer direct mail and articles in local newspapers advice on a wide range of lifestyle issues, but were regarded as the most effective media not specifically on being breast aware. channels. Interestingly, none of the professionals The baseline survey and primary research with interviewed were spontaneously aware of the women found that although many women were breast awareness code, but were very positive aware of the dangers of breast cancer and about it when it was described to them. claimed to check their breasts, most only Although the nurses interviewed had a good checked infrequently and felt they were understanding of what it meant to be breast probably doing it incorrectly. The majority of aware and reported giving women advice about women associated breast awareness with being breast aware, most of the women finding lumps and few were aware of other involved in the research had not received changes to look out for. advice from their GP or nurse about breast awareness. Since some women worried about bothering their GP and many considered the practice nurse the most appropriate person to give breast awareness advice, nurses and community workers (rather than GPs) in particular would be encouraged to proactively provide advice and support around breast awareness.
Recommended publications
  • COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck
    COUNCIL 25 May 2021 Present: Councillors Kitchen (Chair), Affleck, Alam, Billington, Bowden, Bowerman, Boyle, Bray, Cartey, Chadwick, Choksi, Cooney, Cooper, Costello, Dickinson, Drennan, Fairfoull, Feeley, J Fitzpatrick, P Fitzpatrick, Glover, Gosling Gwynne, A Holland, B Holland, J Homer, S Homer, Huntbach, Jackson, Jones, Lane, Lewis, McNally, Martin, Mills, Naylor, Newton, North, Owen, Patel, Patrick, Pearce, Quinn, Reid, Ricci, Robinson, Ryan, N Sharif, T Sharif, M Smith, T Smith, Sweeton, Taylor, Ward, Warrington, R Welsh and Wills 1 ELECTION OF CIVIC MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Owen, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Janet Cooper, be and is hereby elected Civic Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 2 ELECTION OF DEPUTY MAYOR It was moved by Councillor Choksi, seconded by Councillor Lewis and RESOLVED That Councillor Glover be and is hereby appointed Deputy Mayor of the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside for the ensuing Municipal Year 3. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR OF COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councillor Warrington, seconded by Councillor Fairfoull and RESOLVED That Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2021/22. 4. DECLARATION OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 5. COUNCIL MINUTES Consideration was given to the minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting of Council held on 23 February 2021 be signed by the Chair of Council Business as a correct record. 6. ELECTION OF COUNCILLORS A report of the Returning Officer was received detailing the persons elected to the office of Councillor for the Wards of the Borough For details see Appendix A to the minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area
    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10
    Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester
    Chapter 1 Greater Manchester 1.1 Bolton Left = Left List You = You Party Astley Bridge Farnworth Hilary Fairclough C 2,358 Jim Lord Lab 1,151 Clive Atty LD 733 Tariq Aziz LD 955 Muhammad Rafiq Lab 572 Michelle Ionn C 531 Andy Allen You 138 Bradshaw Great Lever [Lab gain from C] Walter Hall C 2,535 Mohammed Iqbal Lab 1,657 James Cottam Lab 620 Mudasir Dean C 1,299 Lauren Alergant LD 342 Alan Johnson Grn 374 Anne Mumberson Grn 195 Mian Akhtar LD 245 Halliwell Breightmet Cliff Morris Lab 1,875 Arthur Norris C 1,696 Shahid Mahmood C 632 William Gallagher Lab 1,182 Riaz Gul LD 494 Carl Hemmings BNP 350 Stephen Howarth LD 163 Harper Green Norma Armston You 137 Lynne Hyland Grn 74 Champak Mistry Lab 1,181 Bill Dawson C 1,071 David Connor LD 390 Bromley Cross Heaton and Lostock Alan Wilkinson C 2,933 Jeremy Foster Lab 705 Alan Rushton C 3,378 David Wibberley LD 331 John Gillatt Lab 831 Liz Spencer Grn 147 Jonathan Evans LD 326 Andy Openshaw You 141 Daniel Mann Grn 249 Horwich and Blackrod [C gain Crompton [Lab gain from LD] from LD] Hanif Darvesh Lab 1,985 Pat Barrow C 1,469 John Partington C 1,113 Kevan Jones Lab 1,021 Yakub Khoda LD 873 Ian Hamilton LD 869 4 1.2. BURY 5 Consolidated Results — Bolton Conservative . 29,254 41.8% 9 councillors Labour . 22,644 32.4% 7 councillors Liberal Democrat . 14,221 20.3% 4 councillors Green Party .
    [Show full text]
  • Key Decision Notice
    ITEM NO: 7 Report To: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND CAPITAL MONITORING PANEL Date: 9 September 2013 Executive Member/ Councillor Gerald P Cooney – Executive Member, Learning Skills and Economic Growth Reporting Officer: Elaine Todd – Assistant Executive Director for Asset Management and Investment Partnership. Subject: EDUCATION CAPITAL PROGRAMME - UPDATE AND TARGETED BASIC NEED BID OUTCOME Report Summary: This report is intended to advise members of outcome of the Targeted Basic Need bid submissions and the implications arising from the successful applications and in addition general updates in respect of Education Capital expenditure. Recommendations: That members of the Strategic Capital Panel the contents of the report and approve in principle the allocation of: £1,677,925 Targeted Capital Funding to Extend Samuel Laycock School plus £75,000 project management fees; £150,000 Targeted Capital Funding project management fees to progress the design and construction of the new Ashton Primary School; £150,000 Targeted Capital project management fees to progress the new Hattersley, Hyde primary school; Temporary allocations from the capital programme to pay for the demolition of the former high school buildings, pending the realisation of capital receipts from the disposal of these sites; £41,224,58 additional Education capital funding to deliver the schemes in Table 4 and £2,284,633.36 Education capital funding to deliver the schemes in Table 5. The proposals contained in this report will support the delivery of Links to Community Strategy: the community strategy. Policy Implications: In line with current policy. Financial Implications: The Department for Education has allocated a total of £8.302 million capital grant for the three projects to extend Samuel (Authorised by the Borough Laycock School and establish a new primary school in both Treasurer) Ashton under Lyne and Hattersley, Hyde, plus a total of £375,000 for the project management of the capital projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside Report to The Electoral Commission August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 349 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 33 Appendices A Final recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 35 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 37 C First draft of electoral change Order for Tameside 39 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw: Area Profile
    A profile of needs and services about children, young people and their families In the Ashton area of Tameside December 2007 1 Ashton: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Ashton area – one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and families will be delivered. The other areas are Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield; Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale and Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive; rather, key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between different localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data whilst Part 2 focuses on services. 2 Contents Ashton: Profile of need and services ...............................................................2 Introduction ...................................................................................................2 Contents........................................................................................................3 Part 1: Basic need data................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections Handbook 2004 Complete
    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2004 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2004 The 2004 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with Galina Borisyuk, Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole & Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2004 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 0 948858 37 0 Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................v Introduction ................................................................................................................. vii Using the Handbook ................................................................................................ xxiii Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities ..................................................................... 1 London Assembly ...................................................................................................... 11 Metropolitan Borough Election Results ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health & Wellbeing Ward Profile Ashton Hurst
    HEALTH & WELLBEING WARD PROFILE ASHTON HURST Population 11,503 ♂48.7% ♀51.3% Ashton Hurst Population (-4.1% Since 2001) Male Population 5,603 Female Population 5,900 (Tameside Population +2.9% Since 2001) (Tameside Male Population 49.1%) (Tameside Female Population 50.9%) Ashton Hurst is one of four wards making up the Market town of Ashton-Under-Lyne. The Population of Ashton Hurst decreased by 4.1% between the 2001 and 2011 censuses. The population of Ashton Hurst has a similar age profile to the Tameside population as a whole. A lower proportion of people in Ashton Hurst are classified as White British compared to Tameside as a whole, with a higher proportion of people of Indian and Pakistani ethnic backgrounds. Employment 55.8% 2.7% 14.2% Employment Rate Job Seekers Allowance Claimant Rate Out of Work Benefit Claimants (Tameside Average=13.6%) 3rd Lowest in Tameside (Tameside Average=2.8%) Ashton Hurst has one of the lowest employment rates out of all wards in Economic Status (% Aged 16-74) Tameside, although the rate of unemployment is not reflective of this. The Ashton Ashton Tameside England Hurst lower employment rate in Ashton Hurst can be accounted for by a higher Hurst (%) (%) (%) rate of economic inactivity within the ward. This higher rate of economic (Number) inactivity within Ashton Hurst is accounted for by a higher proportion of re- Economically Active 5343 63.4 68.8 69.9 tired people within the ward Employee Full Time) 2956 35.1 40.6 38.6 Employee (Part Time) 1151 13.7 13.2 13.7 The rate of out of work benefit claimants in Ashton Hurst is slightly higher than the Tameside average, which can be accounted for by a higher than Self-Employed 597 7.1 7.4 9.7 average rate of ESA and lone parent claimants, with a job seekers allow- Unemployed 436 5.2 5.0 4.4 ance claimant rate that is marginally lower than the Tameside average.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting of the Council
    ITEM NO: 2 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 19 May 2015 Commenced: 5.00pm Adjourned: 6.00 pm Re-commenced: 7.00pm Terminated: 7.55pm Present: Councillor D Lane (Civic Mayor) Councillors Affleck, Bailey, Ballagher, Beeley, Bell, Bowden, Bowerman, Bray, P Buckley, Cartey, Cooney, Dickinson, Downs, Drennan, Fairfoull, J Fitzpatrick, P Fitzpatrick, Fowler, Francis, Glover, Gwynne, A Holland, Jackson, Kinsey, Kitchen, J Lane, McNally, I Miah, R Miah, Middleton, Patrick, Pearce, Peet, Piddington, K Quinn, S. Quinn, Reynolds, Ricci, Robinson, Ryan, Shember-Critchley, Sidebottom, M Smith, T Smith, Taylor, F Travis, L Travis, Ward, Warrington, Welsh, White, Whitehead, and Wild. Apologies for Absence: Councillors Cooper, B Holland and Sweeton. 1. ELECTION OF CIVIC MAYOR RESOLVED That this item be deferred until 7.00pm for the ceremonial part of this meeting. 2. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR OF COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councillor K Quinn and seconded by Councillor Taylor that Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2015/16. RESOLVED That Councillor Kitchen be appointed Chair of Council Business for the Municipal Year 2015/16. 3. CIVIC MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS The Civic Mayor extended a warm welcome to newly elected Members and congratulations to those Members who were re-elected at the Local Elections on 7 May 2015 and also to the borough’s three Members of Parliament on their election success, in particular, Angela Rayner MP who had become Tameside’s first female Member of Parliament. The Civic Mayor further extended congratulations to Councillor Claire Reynolds and her husband Jonathan Reynolds, MP, on the birth of their baby son.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections Handbook 2000 Complete
    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2000 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2000 The 2000 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with the assistance of Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole and Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2000 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permis- sion of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 0 948858 29 X Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................v Using the Digest ......................................................................................................... xvi Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities..................................................................... 1 London Assembly Election Results ............................................................................... 9 Metropolitan Borough Council Election Results .......................................................... 23 English Unitary Council Election Results .................................................................... 53 English
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2007
    Local Election Results May 2007 Andrew Teale August 12, 2017 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2007-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 12th August 2017: Correction to Market ward, Cambridge (thanks to Colin Rosentiel). 1st August 2015: Gain information added for Walsall. 14th April 2015: The seat won by Gwenda Thomas in the Welsh Assembly was Neath, not Gower. 1st April 2015: Blandford Old Town ward, North Dorset was LD gain from C. 22nd March 2015: Chadsmead ward, Lichfield was 1 LD gain from Lab, not 1 LD gain from C. 15th March 2015: Dorchester East ward, West Dorset was 2 LD holds; Dor- chester North ward, West Dorset was 1 LD gain from Ind. 13th March 2015: Winstanley ward, Blaby was 1 C gain from Lab; Calverton ward, Gedling was 2 Calverton First Independents gain from Lab.. 1st March 2015: Consolidated results for Taunton Deane corrected.
    [Show full text]