DOCSLIB.ORG

Xvi. Yüzyilda Erzurum Eyaleti'nde Vakiflar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xvi. Yüzyilda Erzurum Eyaleti'nde Vakiflar ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI Ümit KILIÇ XVI. YÜZYILDA ERZURUM EYALETİ’NDE VAKIFLAR DOKTORA TEZİ TEZ YÖNETİCİSİ Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU ERZURUM - 2005 İÇİNDEKİLER ÖZET……………………………………………………………………………………. XIII ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………….. XIV ÖNSÖZ…………………………………………………………………………………... XV KISALTMALAR……………………………………………………………………….. XVI GİRİŞ……………………………………………………………………………………. 1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM CÂMİ ve MESCİD VAKIFLARI 1. Câmi ve Mescidler………………………………………………………………….. 24 1.1. Erzurum ve Pasin Sancakları…………………………………………………... 25 1.1.1. Erzurum ve Pasin Câmileri ……………………………………………….. 26 1.1.1.1. Câmi-i Kebir ( Ulu Câmi ) ………………………………………… 26 1.1.1.2. Cinis Câmii………………………………………………………… 28 1.1.1.3. Aşkale Câmii………………………………………………………. 28 1.1.1.4. Nerdiban Câmii……………………………………………………. 29 1.1.1.5. Asmasor (Geyik Mehmed) Câmii………………………………… 29 1.1.1.6. Gideverek Câmii…………………………………………………… 29 1.1.1.7. Kasım Bey Câmii (Ulu Câmi ) ……………………………………. 30 1.1.1.8. Mahmud Paşa Câmii (Yeni Câmii) ……………………………….. 31 1.2. Erzurum ve Pasin Mescidleri………………………………………………….. 31 1.2.1. Mahanda Mescidi…………………………………………………………. 31 1.2.2. Hayranıl Kendi Mescidi…………………………………………………... 32 1.2.3. Telariç Mescidi……………………………………………………………. 32 1.2.4. Özbek Mescidi……………………………………………………….…… 33 1.2.5. Konk Mescidi……………………………………………………………... 33 1.2.6. Nerdiban Mescidi…………………………………………………………. 33 1.2.7. Asmasor (Geyik Mehmed) Mescidi………………………………………. 34 1.2.8. Nozron ? Mescidi…………………………………………………………. 34 1.2.9. Sultan Süleyman Han Mescidi …………………………………………… 34 1.2.10. Tabbah Ahmed Mescidi……………………………………………….… 35 1.2.11. Nalband Ali Mescidi ……………………………………….…………… 35 1.2.12. Divane Ali Mescidi……………………………………….….………….. 35 1.2.13. Kara Çırak Mescidi ………………………………………….………….. 36 1.2.14. Hasan Reis Mescidi …………………………………………………….. 36 1.2.15. Oruç Çavuş Mescidi……………………………………………………... 36 1.3. Kemah Sancağı………………………………………………………………… 36 1.3.1 Kemah Câmileri …………………………………………………………. 37 1.3.1.1. Cemaleddin ve Ahi Ferec Câmii ve Mescidleri…………………... 37 1.3.1.2. Câmi-i Kebir ( Gülabi Bey Câmii ) ……………………………….. 38 1.3.1.3. Halilullah Câmii…………………………………………………… 39 1.3.1.4. Cimin Köyü Câmii………………………………………………… 39 1.3.1.5. Keladenç Köyü Câmii…………………………………………….. 40 1.3.1.6. Varnebin Köyü Câmii…………………………………………….. 40 1.4. Kemah Mescidleri……………………………………………………………... 40 III 1.4.1. Dikke Mescidi…………………………………………………………….. 40 1.4.2. Kurdlar Mescidi…………………………………………………………… 41 1.4.3. Gercanis Mescidi…………………………………………….……………. 41 1.4.4. Gürk Barak Mescidi………………………………………………………. 42 1.4.5. Gendümeciyan Mescidi…………………………………………………… 42 1.4.6. Şah Mürüvvet Hatun Mescidi……………………………………………... 42 1.4.7. Pağnik Mescidi……………………………………………………………. 42 1.4.8. Silos Mescidi……………………………………………………………… 43 1.4.9. Endiris Mescidi…………………………………………………………… 43 1.4.10. Şeyh Yusuf Mescidi………………………………………………….….. 43 1.4.11. Kertah Mescidi………………………………………………………….. 43 1.4.12. Kiştim Mescidi…………………………………………………………... 44 1.5. Bayburd Sancağı ……………………………………………………………… 44 1.5.1. Bayburt Câmileri ………………………………………………………… 45 1.5.1.1. Câmi-i Kebir (Ulu Câmii) …………………………………...…… 45 1.5.1.2. Şeyh Veysel Câmii………………………………………………… 46 1.5.1.3. Hacı Bey Câmii ve Zaviyesi………………………………..……… 46 1.5.1.4. Hasan Ali Bey Câmii……………………………………………… 47 1.5.1.5. Pekeriç Câmii…………………………………………….……….. 47 1.5.1.6. Mans Köyü Câmii…………………………………………………. 48 1.5.1.7. Mezgegi Câmii…………………………………………………….. 48 1.5.2. Bayburt Mescidleri………………………………………………….……. 48 1.5.2.1. Şingah Mescidi…………………………………………….……… 48 1.5.2.2. Veled Kadı Mescidi……………………………………………….. 49 1.5.2.3. Bekir Çelebi Mescidi……………………………………………… 49 1.5.2.4. Hasaniye Mescidi………………………………………………….. 49 1.5.2.5. Kadı Mahmud Mescidi……………………………………………. 49 1.5.2.6. Feracullah Mescidi………………………………………………… 50 1.5.2.7. Ahi Emir Ahmed Zencani Mescidi………………………………… 50 1.5.2.8. Şeyh Hayran Mescidi……………………………………………… 50 1.5.2.9. Molla Rıza Mescidi……………………………………………….. 50 1.5.2.10. Sabos Mescidi……………………………………………………. 51 1.5.2.11. Çıtanos Mescidi………………………………………………….. 51 1.5.2.12. Lori Mescidi……………………………………………………… 51 1.5.2.13. Mileyhi Mescidi………………………………………………….. 51 1.5.2.14. Eymür Mescidi…………………………………………………… 51 1.5.2.15. Vinkar Mescidi…………………………………………………… 52 1.5.2.16. Dacirek Mescidi…………………………………………….……. 52 1.5.2.17. Varicna Mescidi…………………………………………………. 52 1.5.2.18. Posus Mescidi……………………………………………………. 52 1.5.2.19. Gerdekhisarı Mescidi……………………………………………... 53 1.5.2.20. Kelvez Mescidi…………………………………………………… 53 1.5.2.21. Gemud-ı Ulya Mescidi…………………………………………… 53 1.5.2.22. Mevlana Hacı Zahid Mescidi……………………………………. 53 1.5.2.23. Sonyar Mescidi………………………………………………….. 54 1.5.2.24. Corcin Mescidi…………………………………………………... 54 IV 1.6. Şarki Karahisar Sancağı…………………………………………………….…. 54 1.6.1. Karahisar-ı Şarki Câmileri …………………………………………….….. 55 1.6.1.1. Karahisar-ı Şarki Câmii …………………………………………… 55 1.6.1.2. Büyük Kuzıl Câmii………………………………………………... 56 1.6.2. Karahisar-ı Şarki Mescidleri……………………………………………… 56 1.6.2.1. Kâtib Hamza Mescidi……………………………………………… 56 1.6.2.2. Taş Mescid Vakfı …………………………………………………. 57 1.7. Trabzon Sancağı………………………………………………………………. 57 1.7.1. Trabzon Câmileri…………………………………………………………. 58 1.7.1.1. Fatih ( Orta Hisar) Câmii …………………………………………. 58 1.7.1.2. Hatuniye Câmii Evkafı …………………………………………… 59 1.7.1.3. Ahi Çukuru Câmii ………………………………………………... 61 1.7.1.4. Hacı Abdullah Câmii……………………………………………… 61 1.7.1.5. Yakub Halife (Dede) Câmii………………………………….…… 62 1.7.1.6. Hüdavendigar Câmii ……………………………………………… 62 1.7.1.7. Karallar Câmii…………………………………………………….. 62 1.7.2. Trabzon Mescidleri……………………………………………………….. 63 1.7.2.1. Mevlana Miri Mescidi ……………………………………………. 63 1.7.2.2. Amasyalu Mescidi………………………………………………… 63 1.7.2.3 Hacı Baba Mescidi…………………………………………………. 63 1.7.2.4. Hacı Kasım Mescidi……………………………………………….. 64 1.7.2.5 Ahmed Çelebi Mescidi………………………………………….….. 64 1.8. Kızucan Sancağı………………………………………………………….…… 64 1.8.1. Kızucan Câmileri…………………………………………………….……. 64 1.8.1.1. Allahvirdi Bey Câmii……………………………………………... 64 1.9. Hınıs Sancağı………………………………………………………………….. 65 1.9.1. Hınıs Mescidleri…………………………………………………………... 66 1.9.1.1. Abdullah Mescidi…………………………………………………. 66 İKİNCİ BÖLÜM MEDRESE VE MEKTEB VAKIFLARI 2. Medrese ve Mekteb ……………………………………………………….……….. 69 2.1. Erzurum ve Pasin Medreseleri…………………………………………………. 71 2.1.1. Hand (Hundi) Hatun Medresesi…………………………………………… 71 2.1.2. Yakutiye Medresesi……………………………………………………….. 72 2.1.3. Ahmediye Medresesi……………………………………………………… 74 2.1.4. Kasım Bey Medresesi …………………………………………………… 75 2.1.5. Haydarhane Zaviye Muallimhanesi………………………………….…… 76 2.1.6. Sinan Bey Mektebi ………………………………………………………. 76 2.1.7. Veli Bey Mektebi ………………………………………………………… 76 2.2. Kemah Medreseleri……………………………………………………………. 77 2.2.1. Cemaliye Medresesi………………………………………………………. 77 2.2.2. Melik Fahreddin Gazi Medresesi…………………………………………. 78 2.2.3. Taharten Bey Medresesi…………………………………………………... 79 2.2.4. Kadı İftihareddin Medresesi………………………………………………. 79 2.2.5. Darü’l – İlm Medresesi……………………………………………………. 80 V 2.2.6. Atabek Medresesi……………………………………………………….… 80 2.2.7. Abdülkerim Medresesi……………………………………………………. 80 2.2.8. Pervane Medresesi………………………………………………………… 81 2.2.9. İbadiye Medresesi…………………………………………………………. 81 2.2.10. Torumtay Medresesi…………………………………………..…………. 82 2.2.11. Nizamiye Medresesi………………………………………….………….. 82 2.2.12. Lalahan Medresesi……………………………………………….………. 82 2.2.13. Ahmediye Bukası……………………………………………….……….. 83 2.3. Bayburt Medreseleri…………………………………………………………… 83 2.3.1. Yakutiye Medresesi……………………………………………….………. 83 2.3.2. Mahmudiye Medresesi……………………………………………………. 84 2.3.3. Museviyye Medresesi……………………………………………….…….. 84 2.3.4. İkbaliyye Medresesi……………………………………………….………. 85 2.3.5. Muallimhane Vakfı………………………………………………….…….. 85 ÜÇÜNCÜ BÖLÜM ZAVİYE VE TEKKE VAKIFLARI 3. Zaviye ve Tekke Vakıfları…………………………………………………………. 88 3.1. Erzurum ve Pasin Zaviye ve Tekkeleri…………………………………...…… 89 3.1.1. Saltuk Gazi Zaviyesi………………………………………………….…… 89 3.1.2. Haydarhane Zaviyesi………………………………………………..…….. 90 3.1.3. Abdurrahman Zaviyesi…………………………………………….……… 91 3.1.4. Ebu İshak Kaziruni Zaviyesi……………………………………………… 92 3.1.5. Hasan Basri Zaviyesi……………………………………………………… 92 3.1.6. Abbas Şeyh Zaviyesi……………………………………………………… 93 3.1.7. Kılıç Derviş Zaviyesi……………………………………………………… 93 3.1.8. Mehdi Şeyh Zaviyesi……………………………………………………… 93 3.1.9. Yoncalık Zaviyesi…………………………………………………………. 94 3.1.10. Künbed Zaviyesi………………………………………….……………… 94 3.1.11. Çiçekli Zaviyesi…………………………………………….……………. 95 3.1.12. Cinis Zaviyesi -I…………………………………………………………. 95 3.1.13. Cinis Zaviyesi – II……………………………………………………….. 96 3.1.14. Cinis Zaviyesi – III ……………………………………………………… 96 3.1.15. Cinis Zaviyesi -IV……………………………………………………….. 96 3.1.16. Dirvas Zaviyesi…………………………………………………………... 96 3.1.17. Şeyh Ali Zaviyesi………………………………………………………... 97 3.1.18. Nerdiban Zaviyesi – I……………………………………………………. 97 3.1.19. Nerdiban Zaviyesi – II…………………………………………………… 97 3.1.20. Özbek Zaviyesi – I………………………………………………………. 98 3.1.21. Özbek Zaviyesi – II …………………………………………………...… 98 3.1.22. Haydarhane Zaviyesi…………………………………………………..… 98 3.1.23. Ketonos Zaviyesi -I……………………………………………………… 99 3.1.24. Ketonos Zaviyesi – II………………………………………………….… 99 3.1.25. Çermik Zaviyesi…………………………………………………………. 100 3.1.26. Ortuzi Zaviyesi – I……………………………………….………………. 100 3.1.27. Ortuzı Zaviyesi – II……………………………………………………… 101 VI 3.1.28. Canviran Zaviyesi……………………………………………………….. 101 3.1.29. Turhas Zaviyesi………………………………………………………….. 101 3.1.30. Tebrizcik Zaviyesi…………………………………………….…………. 102 3.1.31. Söğütlü Zaviyesi………………………………………………………… 102 3.1.32. Tosik Zaviyesi…………………………………………………………… 102 3.1.33. Gayb Er Zaviyesi………………………………………………………… 103 3.1.34. Arzutı Zaviyesi…………………………………………………………..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milli Mücadele Döneminde Mehmet Akif Ve Islamcilik*
    Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 9/12 Fall 2014, p. 563-572, ANKARA-TURKEY MİLLİ MÜCADELE DÖNEMİNDE MEHMET AKİF VE İSLAMCILIK* Emin OBA** Dinçer ÖZTÜRK** Hulisi GÜRBÜZ** ÖZET Mehmet Akif Ersoy edebi kişiliği, ahlakı ve yaşam tarzı ile örnek bir insan modelidir. İstiklal Marşı şairi olarak da bilinen Akif, Türk halkının gönlünde taht kurmuştur. Sadece Türkiye’deki Türklerin değil, diğer coğrafyalarda yaşayan Türklerinde gönlünü fethetmiş, sevgisini kazanmıştır. Çalışmamızda, Mehmet Akif’in İslamcılık fikirleri ve faaliyetleri hakkında bilgi verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Akif’in İslamcılık fikri için yaptıklarına değinilmiştir. Onun İslamcılık anlayışı ve beklentilerinin neler olduğu ve bu beklentileri gerçekleştirmek için yaptığı çalışmalar dikkate alınmıştır. Akif halkı, Asr-ı Saadet zamanındaki İslam yaşamı gibi, bir hayatın yaşanması gerektiği fikrini savunmuştur. Bunu vaazlarında dile getirmiştir. Burada Akif’in daha çok Anadolu’da verdiği vaazlara dikkat çekilmek istenmiştir (Kastamonu Nasrullah Camii Vaazı, Balıkesir Zağanos Paşa Camii Vaazı gibi). Mehmet Akif’in Milli Mücadele’deki faaliyetleri ve fikirleri verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Akif, Müslüman toplumların, Gayr-ı Müslim toplumların boyunduruğu altında yaşayamayacağı fikrini savunmuştur. Osmanlı devletinin yıkılma sürecine girmesinden dolayı, imparatorluğun bünyesinde yaşayan devletlerin kendi kaderinin tayin etmesi gerektiği fikrini savunarak, Milli Mücadeleye her alanda destek vermiştir. Bu doğrultuda Anadolu’nun çeşitli yerlerinde vaazlar vermiş, halkın milli mücadeleye destek vermelerini istemiştir. Ayrıca, çalışmamızda Akif’in Sebilü’r-reşad ve Sırat-ı Müstakim’deki konumu hakkında bilgilere de yer verilmiştir. Akif, bu mecmualar aracılığıyla Milli Mücadeleyi eserleriyle desteklemiştir. Akif’in siyasi yönü üzerinde de durulmuştur. O siyasetin her türlüsünden kaçınmıştır, daha ileri giderek siyaset kelimesinden bile uzak durmuştur. Siyasetten Allah’a sığınmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Structural and Architectural Properties of Historical Kastamonu Houses
    IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) www.iosrjen.org ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719 Vol. 07, Issue 12 (December. 2017), ||V1|| PP 69-73 Investigation Of Structural And Architectural Properties Of Historical Kastamonu Houses Ahmet Gökdemir1,Can Demirel2 1(Gazi University Faculty of Technology Department of Civil Engineering,Ankara /Turkey) 2(Kırklareli University, Pınarhisar Vocational School, Construction Department, Kırklareli /Turkey) Corresponding Author: Can Demirel2 Abstract: The destruction and desolation of historical environment is important not only in the architectural terms but also in cultural and historical values. Kastamonu, the city rich in historical and cultural heritage, is one of the most important settlements of the traditional Turkish house and of the near-term Ottoman architecture. In this study, the architectural and structural features of the Historical Kastamonu Houses are examined and the causes of damage to houses are mentioned in the light of this information. Keywords: - Kastamonu Houses, architectural, historical, cultural. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Submission: 15-12-2017 Date of acceptance: 30-12-2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. INTRODUCTION Traditional Turkish houses have undergone major developments in time and in regions distinct in terms of climate, nature and culture, and this has brought different house types. On the other hand, all traditional houses are made up of certain cultural values. When the architectural design and details of traditional Turkish houses are examined, it is seen that all designs and solutions serve a certain purpose and have a certain benefit. In particular, the concept of privacy developed through the transition to settled life and acceptance of Islam; played an important role in the formation of traditional Turkish houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Smell in Historical Environments
    New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 4, Issue 11, (2017) 297-306 ISSN : 2547-881 www.prosoc.eu Selected Paper of 6th World Conference on Design and Arts (WCDA 2017), 29 June – 01 July 2017, University of Zagreb, Zagreb – Croatia. Effect of Smell in Historical Environments Nur Belkayali a*, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37000, Turkey. Elif Ayan b, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37000, Turkey. Suggested Citation: Belkayali, N. & Ayan, E. (2017). Effect of smell in historical environments. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. [Online]. 4(11), 297-306. Available from: www.prosoc.eu Selection and peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Ayse Cakir Ilhan, Ankara University, Turkey. ©2017 SciencePark Research, Organization & Counseling. All rights reserved. Abstract Smell is an obscure composition in the space planning and design processes, while visual and audial aspects are more dominant. Smell has an important place in the preference of the place, is an important factor affecting people in terms of sociological, psychological and bioclimatic comforts, although it differs from person to person. In this study, the existence of natural and artificial smell sources in historical environments and the effect of the smell of the preference of these environments were investigated. The study was carried out in historical sites located in the urban site in the centre of Kastamonu province. The study emphasises that in the process of space planning and design, smell should be evaluated together with other senses. Also, attempts have been made to determine the contribution of the sources of smell to historical places, which has an important position for urban identity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Mehmet Akif Ersoy and Ziya Gökalp
    ISLAMIST AND TURKIST CONCEPTUALIZATION OF NATION IN THE LATE OTTOMAN PERIOD: A COMPARISON OF MEHMET AKİF ERSOY AND ZİYA GÖKALP A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY BY KEMAL UFUK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JUNE 2019 Approval of the Institute of Social Sciences: __________________________________ Doç. Dr. Seyfullah YILDIRIM Manager of Institute I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ____________________________________ Prof. Dr. Birol AKGÜN Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. _____________________________________ Asst. Prof. Dr. Bayram SİNKAYA Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Serdar PALABIYIK (TOBB ETU, PSIR)__________________ Asst. Prof. Dr. Bayram SİNKAYA (AYBU, IR) __________________ Asst. Prof. Dr. Güliz DİNÇ (AYBU, PSPA) __________________ ii I hereby declare that all information in this thesis has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work; otherwise I accept all legal responsibility. Name, Last name : Kemal UFUK Signature : iii ABSTRACT ISLAMIST AND TURKIST CONCEPTUALIZATION OF NATION IN THE LATE OTTOMAN PERIOD: A COMPARISON OF MEHMET AKİF ERSOY AND ZİYA GÖKALP UFUK, Kemal M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for the Study of Islamic Architecture Historical Section
    RESOURCES FOR THE STUDY OF ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE HISTORICAL SECTION Prepared by: Sabri Jarrar András Riedlmayer Jeffrey B. Spurr © 1994 AGA KHAN PROGRAM FOR ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE RESOURCES FOR THE STUDY OF ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE HISTORICAL SECTION BIBLIOGRAPHIC COMPONENT Historical Section, Bibliographic Component Reference Books BASIC REFERENCE TOOLS FOR THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC ART AND ARCHITECTURE This list covers bibliographies, periodical indexes and other basic research tools; also included is a selection of monographs and surveys of architecture, with an emphasis on recent and well-illustrated works published after 1980. For an annotated guide to the most important such works published prior to that date, see Terry Allen, Islamic Architecture: An Introductory Bibliography. Cambridge, Mass., 1979 (available in photocopy from the Aga Khan Program at Harvard). For more comprehensive listings, see Creswell's Bibliography and its supplements, as well as the following subject bibliographies. GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES AND PERIODICAL INDEXES Creswell, K. A. C. A Bibliography of the Architecture, Arts, and Crafts of Islam to 1st Jan. 1960 Cairo, 1961; reprt. 1978. /the largest and most comprehensive compilation of books and articles on all aspects of Islamic art and architecture (except numismatics- for titles on Islamic coins and medals see: L.A. Mayer, Bibliography of Moslem Numismatics and the periodical Numismatic Literature). Intelligently organized; incl. detailed annotations, e.g. listing buildings and objects illustrated in each of the works cited. Supplements: [1st]: 1961-1972 (Cairo, 1973); [2nd]: 1972-1980, with omissions from previous years (Cairo, 1984)./ Islamic Architecture: An Introductory Bibliography, ed. Terry Allen. Cambridge, Mass., 1979. /a selective and intelligently organized general overview of the literature to that date, with detailed and often critical annotations./ Index Islamicus 1665-1905, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextualizing an 18 Century Ottoman Elite: Şerđf Halđl Paşa of Şumnu and His Patronage
    CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE by AHMET BĐLALOĞLU Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University 2011 CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülay Artan …………………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Dr. Hülya Adak …………………………. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bratislav Pantelic …………………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: 8 SEPTEMBER 2011 © Ahmet Bilaloğlu, 2011 All rights Reserved ABSTRACT CONTEXTUALIZING AN 18 TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ELITE: ŞERĐF HALĐL PAŞA OF ŞUMNU AND HIS PATRONAGE Ahmet Bilaloğlu History, MA Thesis, 2011 Thesis Supervisor: Tülay Artan Keywords: Şumnu, Şerif Halil Paşa, Tombul Mosque, Şumnu library. The fundamental aim of this thesis is to present the career of Şerif Halil Paşa of Şumnu who has only been mentioned in scholarly research due to the socio-religious complex that he commissioned in his hometown. Furthermore, it is aimed to portray Şerif Halil within a larger circle of elites and their common interests in the first half of the 18 th century. For the study, various chronicles, archival records and biographical dictionaries have been used as primary sources. The vakıfnâme of the socio-religious complex of Şerif Halil proved to be a rare example which included some valuable biographical facts about the patron. Apart from the official posts that Şerif Halil Paşa occupied in the Defterhâne and the Divânhâne , this study attempts to render his patronage of architecture as well as his intellectual interests such as calligraphy and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Thought of Mehmet Akif Ersoy
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2019 In Pursuit of Indigenous Turkish Philosophy of Education: The Educational TZekhi Aokduemgirht of Mehmet Akif Ersoy Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION IN PURSUIT OF INDIGENOUS TURKISH PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION: THE EDUCATIONAL THOUGHT OF MEHMET AKIF ERSOY By ZEKI AKDEMIR A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 © 2019 Zeki Akdemir Zeki Akdemir defended this dissertation on November 12, 2019. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jeffrey Ayala Milligan Professor Directing Dissertation William Hanley University Representative Robert Schwartz Committee Member Carolyn Herrington Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I could not finish this dissertation without the guidance and prodigious patience of my major professor, Jeffrey Ayala Milligan. Dr. Milligan, I do not know how to thank you for your great support during the entire dissertation process. Your help before, during and after preparation of every single chapter of this dissertation made it possible to reach this level. I am also grateful to Dr. Robert Schwartz, Dr. Carolyn Herrington and Dr. William Hanley, my dissertation committee members, for their great encouragement, suggestions, and very helpful feedback. Their supervision and wisdom made it possible for me to complete my degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Türkçe Yaz Okulu
    Yunus Emre Enstitüsü TÜRKÇE YAZ OKULU 118 ÜLKEDEN 1000 ÖĞRENCİYİ AĞIRLADI Turkish summer school hosted 1000 students from 118 countries IGA_42x27,5_ciftSayfa.pdf 1 7.11.2018 13:50 İÇİNDEKİLER/ CONTENTS YUNUS EMRE ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRKİYE’NİN KÜLTÜR DERGİSİ Magazine of Culture of Turkey KAPAK / COVER Yunus Emre Enstitüsü Başkanı S2 Uluslararası Medya ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Ltd. Şti. 18 President of Yunus Emre Institute Yayın Grubu Başkanı KAPAK / COVER Prof. Dr. Şeref Ateş President TÜRKÇE YAZ OKULU 118 ÜLKEDEN 1000 Genel Yayın Yönetmeni Ahmet Utku ÖĞRENCİYİ AĞIRLADI Executive Editor Finans Koordinatorü Turkish summer school hosted 1000 Şenol Selçuk Turan Finance Coordinator students from 118 countries Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Hakan Çetin Editor in Chief Editoryal Koordinator Dr. Mehmet Yalçın Yılmaz Deputy Editorial Coordinator USTADAN SIRLAR / MASTER SECRETS Editörler Nagehan Aydın Editors [email protected] 44 Ceyda Obruk Sorumlu Müdür USTADAN SIRLAR / MASTER SECRETS Bünyamin Demir Manager EFSANELERİ VE KAHRAMANLARIYLA: DONDURMA Yönetim Yeri Özden Yorgancı Legends and heroes of ‘ice cream’ Management Location [email protected] Anafartalar Mah. Atatürk Bulvarı No:11 Ulus, Ankara Görsel Editör 2 Visual Editor 3 İletişim Ebru İnal Contact [email protected] E-posta: [email protected] İngilizce Tel: +90 312 309 11 88 YEŞİL MAVİ TÜRKİYE / BLUE GREEN TURKEY Faks/fax: +90 312 309 16 15 English 48 Hoss Ajans Katkıda Bulunanlar YEŞİL MAVİ TÜRKİYE / BLUE GREEN TURKEY / yeeorgtr /yeeorgtr /yeeorgtr /user/yeeorgtr Contributors MEZOPOTAMYA OVASI’NDAN SERİN TAŞLARINA… /+yeeorgtr/videos /yeeorgtr Selin Akgün, Ferhat Makasçı, Beril Şen, City in the Mesopotamia plain made of cool stones… Ela Demirciler, Tarık Er MARDİN Tasarım Baskı-Cilt Design Printing and Binding www.hossajans.com.tr Soylu Matbaa Yayın Kırtasiye San.Tic.Ltd.Şti HOSS AJANS ZANAAT / CRAFT Maltepe Mah.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara Vakıf Eserleri Müzesi'nde Bulunan Bir Grup Etütlük
    Ankara Vakıf Eserleri Müzesi’nde Bulunan Bir Grup Etütlük Madalyonlu Uşak Halısının İncelenmesi The Analysis of the Some of the Medallion Ushak (Uşak) Elvan ÖZKAVRUK ADANIRâ Berna İLERİ ââ Carpets in the Museum of Foundation Artworks in Ankara ÖZET Anahtar kelimeler: Ankara Vakıf Eserleri Müze- Ankara Vakıf Eserleri Müzesi, Vakıflar Genel si, Uşak Halısı, Madalyonlu Uşak Halısı, Uşak Müdürlüğü tarafından 2007 yılında kurulmuş- Halıları teknik özellikleri tur. Önceki yıllarda Ankara’da Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü’ne ait küçük bir halı ve kilim sergi sa- ABSTRACT lonu bulunan Genel Müdürlük, Türkiye’nin dört The Museum of Foundation Artworks was bir yanından topladığı vakıf eserlerini Ankara’da founded by the Ankara Foundations General bir müze kurarak sergileme kararı almıştır. Bu Directorate in 2007. Previously The General doğrultuda yapılan çalışmalar sonucu bugünkü Directorate had had a small exhibition hall müze binası, Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafın- in which the valuable carpets and kilims had dan 7 Mayıs 2007 tarihinde Ankara Vakıf Eserleri been gathered. Later The General Directorate Müzesi adıyla hizmete açılmıştır. decided to collect other valuable Turkish Müze’de etütlük ve müzelik olmak üzere articles. For this purpose they needed a larger toplam 90 adet Uşak Halısı bulunmaktadır. Bu space and a museum building. The museum halılar, Ankara’dan Hoca İbadullah Camii, Ahi building, was restored by the Foundations Elvan Camii, Telli Hacı Halil Mescidi, İkişerefeli General Directorate, and opened to the public Camii, Sultan Alâeddin Camii, Hacı Arab Camii, in 2007. Yozgat’tan Çapanoğlu Camii, Elazığ’dan Har- There have been 90 Usak carpet pieces which put Sare Hatun Camii, Kastamonu’dan Nasrul- were classified as museum piece or etude piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Celalzade Mustafa Çeleb, Bureaucracy
    “KOCA N İŞ ANCI” OF KANUN İ: CELALZADE MUSTAFA ÇELEB İ, BUREAUCRACY AND “KANUN” IN THE REIGN OF SULEYMAN THE MAGNIFICENT (1520–1566) A Ph.D. Dissertation by MEHMET ŞAK İR YILMAZ Department of History Bilkent University Ankara September 2006 To my family “KOCA N İŞ ANCI” OF KANUN İ: CELALZADE MUSTAFA ÇELEB İ, BUREAUCRACY AND “KANUN” IN THE REIGN OF SULEYMAN THE MAGNIFICENT (1520–1566) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by MEHMET ŞAK İR YILMAZ In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2006 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Halil İnalcık Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Özer Ergenç Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Hasan Ünal Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of Islamist Political Thought in Turkey from the Empire to the Early Republic (1908-1960): Necip Fazil Kisakürek’S Political Ideas
    TRANSFORMATION OF ISLAMIST POLITICAL THOUGHT IN TURKEY FROM THE EMPIRE TO THE EARLY REPUBLIC (1908-1960): NECİP FAZIL KISAKÜREK’S POLITICAL IDEAS The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by BURHANETTİN DURAN In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION in THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA January, 2001 I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of
    [Show full text]
  • (Islam Tarihi) Anabilim Dali
    TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İSLAM TARİHİ VE SANATLARI (İSLAM TARİHİ) ANABİLİM DALI OSMANLI DÖNEMİ ÜSKÜP VAKIFLARI Doktora Tezi Hasan TELLİ Ankara-2018 I TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İSLAM TARİHİ VE SANATLARI (İSLAM TARİHİ) ANABİLİM DALI OSMANLI DÖNEMİ ÜSKÜP VAKIFLARI Doktora Tezi Hasan TELLİ Tez Danışmanı Doç. Dr. Halide ASLAN Ankara-2018 II III TEŞEKKÜR Rahman ve Rahim olan Allah‟ın adıyla. Bütün hamdler, Ģükürler ve övgüler alemlerin Rabbi olan Allah‟a olsun. Sonsuz güç, kudret ve ilim sahibi Allah‟ın ilmi sayısınca en güzel salat, selam ve ihtiramlar ümmeti olmakla Ģeref bulduğum peygamberlerin sonucusu Hazreti Muhammed Mustafa‟ya, cümle enbiyaya, ashabına, etbaına ve sevdiği kullarının üzerine olsun. “Osmanlı Dönemi Üsküp Vakıfları” konulu doktora tezimin hazırlanmasında çok önemli katkıları olan danıĢman hocalarım Prof. Dr. Nesimi YAZICI ve Doç. Dr. Halide ASLAN hocalarıma, bilgilerinden ve rehberliklerinden istifade ettiğim Prof. Dr. Mehmet ÖZDEMĠR, Prof. Dr. Abdulkadir DÜNDAR, Prof. Dr. Recai DOĞAN, Prof. Dr. Mustafa TURAN, Doç. Dr. Yasin YILMAZ, merhum Prof. Dr. Ġbrahim SARIÇAM, Prof. Dr. Ġrfan AYCAN, Prof. Dr. Seyfettin ERġAHĠN, Prof. Dr. Nahide BOZKURT, Prof. Dr. Eyüp BAġ, Prof. Dr. Hasan KURT, Prof. Dr. Mehmet DALKILIÇ ve Dr. Öğretim Üyesi Ġbrahim ĠMAMOĞLU hocalarıma, araĢtırmada bizlere destek ve yardımcı olan Diyanet ĠĢleri BaĢkanlığı‟na, Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü ArĢivi, Osmanlı Devlet ArĢivi, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi ArĢivi ve Makedonya Devlet ArĢivi ve kütüphanesindeki yetkili ve görevli dostlara, beni yetiĢtirip okutan babam Abdulgani TELLĠ ve annem Hayrülberiye TELLĠ‟ye, araĢtırmamın tüm süresi boyunca bana desteğini esirgemeyen eĢim Fatma Zehra TELLĠ, çocuklarım Huzeyfe TELLĠ ve Gülnihal TELLĠ‟ye, tüm aileme, kayıtlarda yardımcı olan Fethullah ÖNCÜ‟ye ve bizim üzerimizde hakkı olan herkese çok teĢekkür ederim.
    [Show full text]