Justice in Greek Literature Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Justice in Greek Literature Dr Justice in Greek Literature Dr. Karen Rosenbecker CLHU N202 Bobet 312 Fall 2019 ex. 2295/504.982.2656 MW 3:30-4:45PM krosenbe @ loyno.edu Office Hours MW 9:30-10:30; F 3:00-3:30 and by appointment Justice in Greek Literature Goals and Objectives: In this class we will study the concept of justice as it is represented in works of poetry and prose, fiction, and non-fiction within the world of Classical Greece. We will also look specifically at the Athenian legal system, its uses, abuses, successes, and shortcomings. The goals for the course are… • To encourage and sharpen the skill of close reading, to see how the theme of justice is carried • throughout a work. • To foster analytical skills through class discussion and responses to the texts and to other students’ • ideas. • To polish writing skills and speaking skills through written work, directed discussion, debate, and • performance. • To appreciate the necessity for justice within society and to observe how the question “what is justice?” is answered differently as societies change. • To increase general knowledge of the cultures of the ancient world. • To highlight aspects of the Jesuit mission (specifically concerns about social justice) through the exploration of how systems of justice can be manipulated to provide the illusion of equality and fairness. Please note that information on the following resources and regulations is provided by “Part 2” of the syllabus, which is generated by Loyola’s administration. Please confer with Part 2 for information on: • Academic Honesty and Plagiarism • Office for Accessible Education • Emergency Procedures • University Counseling Center • Blackboard and Online Learning Support • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) • J. Edgar & Louise S. Monroe Library • Information Technology • Student Success Center Texts Required and Blackboard Access Many readings will be on BB. It is your responsibility to make sure you have access to the course site. The required texts are: 1. No Country for Old Men (Cormac McCarthy) Vintage International Paperback Paperback, 2007 978-0307387134 2. The Theogony and Works and Days (Hesiod (trans. M.L. West)) Oxford World's Classics Paperback, reissue 2009 ISBN-13: 978-0199538317 3. Aeschylus Oresteia (Aeschylus (trans. Peter Meineck)) Hackett Publishing Company Paperback, 1998 978-0872203907 Grading Scale and Explanation of Requirements Attendance 10% Participation/Discussion/In Class Work 10% Papers 1, 2, and 4 40% (Paper 1=17.5%, Paper 2=17.5%, Paper 4=5%) Revision of Papers 1 and2 10% **Mock Trial** 30% (Deme Time/Performance 10%, Paper 15-20%, Revisions 0-5%) Attendance: Attendance is crucial to the writing process and to the preparation for the Mock Trial. It is also crucial for Participation and In Class Work. Therefore, I have decided to make it part of the grade. Please note this is not a case of “miss three classes and you flunk”; attendance is a portion of your grade, so missed days shave points off your total for the course. Please be aware that any excused absences must be arranged with me ahead of time (i.e. contacting me and receiving my ok at least 24 hours ahead of time) and not after the fact. Participation/Discussion is more than simply being present in class. It means coming to class with the day’s reading done and being able to contribute to class discussion in a meaningful way. Please note that credit for participation is also something that accrues over time; you cannot make up for missed time by participating like crazy for a couple of days. Papers 1, 2, and 4 Papers 1 and 2 focus on discussing and analyzing sources and concepts we have explored in class. Each will be submitted and revised in light of feedback from the instructor/fellow classmates. Paper 4 will be a brief creative/editorial project. **The Mock Trial** is a combination of debate, historical re-enactment, theater production, and paper. It is meant to give us a sense of what it was like to serve on a jury, what it was like to be a prosecutor/defendant in the Athenian courts, what it was like to hijack the system or what it meant to be a fair and impartial juror. Much more will be said about the Mock Trial during class and written instructions for your roles will be available later. **Although you will have some choice as to which role you play in the trial, PLEASE NOTE THAT EVERYONE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MOCK TRIAL IN ORDER TO PASS THIS CLASS**. “Make Up” Work and Rescheduling RESCHEDULING DUE DATES MUST BE ARRANGED AHEAD OF TIME by speaking with me and receiving my permission. Some due dates, like when the Mock Trial occurs, cannot be rescheduled. Please be aware that I do not allow rescheduling of rescheduled due dates. How to do well The best way to do well is to come to class. Even if you secretly run the world and are consequently overscheduled, come to class. Even if you feel confident that you have an intuitive grasp of justice in the Greek psyche, come to class. Even if you are so disorganized that you cannot find yourself, much less your books, come to class. Just come to class. Finally, if you have any concerns, come see me ASAP. Schedule of Assignments Subject to change by instructor WEEKS 1, 2, and 3: Justice in the Homeric World Key Concepts/Terms: religion, myth, poet, themis, nomos, dike, agon, xenia, basileus, aristocracy, oaths and sacrifices, epic poetry, song culture Week 1 August 19th and 21st M Viewing Due: Ancient Greek History Introduction (link on BB) Gods and Goddesses (link on BB) In Class: Introduction to the Greeks Introduction to Homer W Reading Due: The Shield of Achilles (Homer, BB) Judgments in Early Greece (MacDowell, BB) Religion (MacDowell, BB) In Class: Introduction to Hesiod Week 2 August 26th and 28th M Readings Due: Prometheus hoodwinks Zeus and The Hawk and the Nightingale (Hesiod) W Readings Due: Odysseus and the Cyclops (Homer, BB) “The Regulation of Cult: Sacred Laws” (Parker, BB) Paper 1 Assignment Handed Out Week 3 September 2nd and 4th M LABOR DAY HOLIDAY W In Class: Work on Paper 1 (Rough Drafts/Outlines) Weeks 4 and 5: Justice in the Polis Key Concepts/Terms: polis, areopagus, eliaia, dikasterion, demokratia, archons, ethopoeia, Week 4 September 9th and 11th M Paper 1 Due Viewing Due: Revolution (Greeks: Crucible of Civilization, link on BB) Readings Due: Magistrates and Juries (MacDowell, BB) The Code of Laws (MacDowell, BB) Prosecutors and Cases (MacDowell, BB) W Viewing Due: Golden Age (Greeks: Crucible of Civilization, link on BB) Readings Due: On the Murder of Eratosthenes (Lysias 1, BB) Week 5 September 16th and 18th M Viewing Due: Empire of the Mind (Greeks: Crucible of Civilization, link on BB) Readings Due: On the Refusal of a Pension (Lysias 24, BB) Rhetoric of the Athenian Citizen (Wolh) W In Class: Assignment of Roles for Mock Trials Introduction to Oresteia Trilogy Weeks 6, 7, and 8: The Courts of Comedy and Tragedy Key Terms/Concepts: tragedy, comedy, performance culture, autarkia, self-help justice Week 6 September 23rd and 25th M Rewrite of Paper 1 Due Readings Due: Agamemon (Aeschylus Oresteia) Deme Time W Readings Due: Deep Plays (Cartledge, BB) In Class: Deme Time Paper Two Assignment Handed Out Week 7 September 30th and October 2nd M Reading Due: The Furies (Aeschylus Oresteia) In Class: Deme Time W In Class: Work on Paper Two (Rough Drafts and Outlines) Week 8 October 7th and 9th M Reading Due: Wasps (Aristophanes, BB) W In Class: Deme Time Weeks 9, 10, and 11: Civic Franchise Key Concepts/Terms: epikleros, hetaera, metic, atimia, ostrakon, asebia Week 9 October 14th and 16th M Fall Break Holiday W Paper Two Due Readings Due: Women and the City of Athens (Pomeroy, BB) Personal Status (MacDowell, BB) Estates and Epikleroi (Phillips, BB) In Class: Introduction to Against Neaira Deme Time Week 10 October 21st and 23rd M Readings Due: Excerpts from Against Neaira (Demosthenes 59, BB) W Readings Due: Impeity (Phillips, BB) In Class: Deme Time Week 11 October 28th and 30th M Rewrite of Paper Two Due Readings Due: Excerpts from Apology of Socrates (Plato, BB) In Class: Deme Time W In Class: Deme Time (Last Check In! Mock Trial Practice!) Weeks 12 and 13: Mock Trial and Aftermath Week 12 November 4th and 6th M In Class: Mock Trial W In Class: Mock Trial Post Mortem Week 13 November 11th and 13th M In Class: Revision and Planning for Mock Trial Write-Up (Rough Drafts/Outlines) W Mock Trial Write Up Due Listening Due: Robin Steinberg: What If We Ended the Injustice of Bail? (BB) Weeks 14, 15, and 16: Modern Visions of Ancient Justice—No Country for Old Men Week 14 November 18th and 20th M Viewing Due: Oprah Winfrey’s Interview of Cormac McCarthy (BB) Reading Due: “Cormac and Oprah, Revisited” (Allen, BB) In Class: Introduction to No Country for Old Men W Viewing Due: No Country for Old Men (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2008) In Class: Paper 4 Handed Out Mock Trial Revision Directions Week 15 November 25th and 27th M Reading Due: NCFOM 1-100 (or thereabouts) W Thanksgiving Break Week 16 December 2nd and 4th M Reading Due: NCFOM 100 to end (or thereabouts) Chigurh’s Coin Toss (Ferraiolo, BB) W In Class: Work with Paper 4 (Outlines/Rough Drafts) Finals Week 17 December 11th W Paper Four due no later than 2:00 PM in Bobet 312 .
Recommended publications
  • The Ancient Greeks
    The Ancient Greeks WHO ARE THE ANCIENT GREEKS? DEMOCRACY/SLAVERY Demos = power, Kratos = people. The word “democracy” translates to “power of the people.” Athens incorporated the first democratic government. Every citizen could have a say in the actions of the government, so long as they were a male over 18 with parents who were citizens. You could not be a woman, foreigner, or slave. For a society that promoted democracy for all, Ancient Greece was inconsistent that it had a slavery class. Every household that could afford it used slaves to help with chores. Slaves were also used in factories and mines, as well as on farms and ships. These hard labor slaves had a much shorter lifespan than household slaves. THE ROLE OF WOMEN In Ancient Greek, women ran their households. If they were part of the middle or high classes, they also supervised any domestic slaves. In general, the women of Ancient Greece did not have any power or voice. They were not formally educated. Parents arranged their daughters’ marriages. They would be allowed out of the house only to attend funerals or religious festivals, unless they had special permission. Sparta provided women with an exception to this rule. Spartan women were expected to own land, to be physically fit, and to be educated. This quote tells you all you need to know about Spartan women. When going to war, Spartan mothers told their sons, “Either come back victorious, or dead on your shield.” WAR/CULTURE There were many contrasts within Ancient Greece society. This was an era known for war.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgetting the Subject
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Hunter College 2008 Forgetting the Subject Christa Davis Acampora CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_pubs/50 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Reading Nietzsche at the Margins Steven V. Hicks and Alan Rosenberg Purdue University Press I West lafayette, Indiana Contents About the Contributors vii Abbreviations of Nietzsche's Texts xi Copyright 2008 by Purdue University. All rights reserved. Editorial Introduction l Printed in the United States of America. Part l: Prefacing the Margins: A Beginning at Self-Disclosure: ISBN 978-1-55753-451-4 Nietzsche on Resolution, Memory, and Autocritique l. David B. Allison, "Resolution and Autocritique in the Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Late Prefaces" l3 Reading Nietzsche at the margins I edited by Steven V. Hicks and Alan Rosenberg. ·' 2. Christa Davis Acampora, "Forgetting the Subject" 34 p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13' 978-1-55753-451-4 (alk. paper) Part 2: Laughing at the Margins: Nietzsche's Tragic/Comic 1. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wtlhelm, 1844-1900. I. Hicks, Steven V.,l956- Sense of Life II. Rosenberg, Alan, 1939- 3. Kathleen Marie Higgins, "Suffering in Nietzsche's B3317.R36 2008 193--dc22 2008003485 Philosophy" 59 4. Lawrence J. Hatab, "To Laugh Out of the Whole Truth: Nietzsche as Tragicomic Satyr" 73 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume XLVI Number 4
    The St. Lawrence County Historical Association OUAR TERLY' Volunre XVI - Nunrber 4 - Fall 2001 The St. Lawrence County Historical Association at the Silas Wright House The St. Lawrence County Historical Association is a private, not-fo based at the Silas Wright House in Canton, New York. Fou constitution, by-laws, and Board of Trustees. The elect its trustees. 2002 Officers: 2002 Trustees: President: Carl Stickney, No Chris Angus, Canton Vice-President: Patricia Carson, Canton Treasurer: Carol John Richard Foster, Rossie Secretary: Susie R. Shawn Gray, Massena ,.: ......."...:? ,..? E. Jane Layo, Waddington ,..:$ Stan Maine, Pierrepont 2002 sta@,Jy Trent Trdock, Executive Director Todd Moe, Norwood sue .J.+e&shore, Collections Manager Cathleen O'Horo, Canton Maryellen Jones, Archives Manager ~everl<~~ownell, ..:.<. Administrative Assistant Tim Strong, Potsdam '<> ..>. ..>. 7..., .... "'-, Peter Van de Water, Cant <::... <::... :*::. "...,., ..... ..>. ..:.. The St. Lawrence County Historical serves as an educational resource for the use in the County's history and traditions. The Assoc to the County's history. In cooperation and coll understanding of and appreciation for the Coun Lawrence County Historical Association operates within museum standards established by the American Association of Museums. SLCHA Membership Membership in the St. Lawrence County Historical Association is open to all interested parties. Annual membership dues are: Individual, $25; SeniorIStudent, $20; Family, $35; Contributor, $50; Supporter, $100; Patron, $250; Businesses, $50 to $1,000. Members receive the SLCHA Quarterly, the Historical Association'sbi-monthly newsletter, and various discounts on publications, programs and events. St. Lawrence County Historical Association at the Silas Wright House 3 East Main Street, PO Box 8 Canton, New York 13617 (315) 386-8133 fax (315) 386-8134 e-mail: [email protected] www.slcha.org -- Published continuously since 1956 I The St.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1998
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 14 | 2001 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1998 Angelos Chaniotis and Joannis Mylonopoulos Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/779 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.779 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2001 Number of pages: 147-231 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Joannis Mylonopoulos, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1998 », Kernos [Online], 14 | 2001, Online since 14 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/779 Kernos Kernos, 14 (2001), p. 147-231. Epigraphie Bulletin for Greek Religion 1998 (EBGR 1998) In this issue we have covered a large part of the publications of 1998, making several additions to previous issues; we still have a long list of articles we should like to present (e.g., from the journal Horos), but this would have delayed the journal's publication substantially. A generous grant from the GISELA UND REINHOLD HXCKER STIFTUNG for our editorial work in 2001 will enable us in EBGR 1999 to close most of the gaps left in this and in earlier issues. In EBGR 1998 we have focused on new epigraphic finds, new interpretations of inscriptions, and epigraphic corpora, but we have also summarized a few archaeological studies which make extensive use of the epigraphic material; for the significant contribu­ tion of archaeology to the study of Greek religion the reader should consuIt the Chronique archéologique in Kernos. As in earlier issues we have not limited ourselves to epigraphy but have included a few references to important papyro­ logical sources (nOS 29, 134, 168, 181, 280, 300) and to the evidence provided by the documents in Linear B (nO 50).
    [Show full text]
  • A Theology of Memory: the Concept of Memory in the Greek Experience of the Divine
    A Theology of Memory: The Concept of Memory in the Greek Experience of the Divine Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Classical Studies Leonard Muellner, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For Master’s Degree by Michiel van Veldhuizen May 2012 ABSTRACT A Theology of Memory: The Concept of Memory in the Greek Experience of the Divine A thesis presented to the Department of Classical Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Michiel van Veldhuizen To the ancient Greek mind, memory is not just concerned with remembering events in the past, but also concerns knowledge about the present, and even the future. Through a structural analysis of memory in Greek mythology and philosophy, we may come to discern the particular role memory plays as the facilitator of vertical movement, throwing a bridge between the realms of humans and gods. The concept of memory thus plays a significant role in the Greek experience of the divine, as one of the vertical bridges that relates mortality and divinity. In the theology of Mnemosyne, who is Memory herself and mother of the Muses, memory connects not only to the singer-poet’s religiously efficacious speech of prophetic omniscience, but also to the idea of Truth itself. The domain of memory, then, shapes the way in which humans have access to the divine, the vertical dimension of which is expliticly expressed in the descent-ascent of the ritual passage of initiation. The present study thus lays bare the theology of Memory.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEK RELIGION Walter Burkert
    GREEK RELIGION Walter Burkert Translated by John Raffan r Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts THINGS’ ANIMAL SACRIFICE II t . I ‘WORKING SACRED 55 diverted activity for the apathy which remains transfixed in reality; it lays claim to the highest seriousness, to the absolute. II When considered from the point of view of the goal, ritual behaviour appears as magic. For a science of religion which regards only instrumental 4 since acts action as meaningful, magic must be seen as the origin of religion, Ritual and Sanctuary which seek to achieve a given goal in an unclear but direct way are magical. The goal then appears to be the attainment of all desirable boons and the elimination of possible impediments: there is rain magic, fertility magic, love magic, and destructive magic. The conception of ritual as a kind of language, however, leads beyond this constraining artifice; magic is present only insofar as ritual is consciously placed in the service of some end — which may then undoubtedly affect the form of the ritual. Religious ritual is given as a collective institution; the individual participates within the framework of social communication, with the strongest motivating force being the need not in the study of religion which came to be generally acknowledged to stand apart. Conscious magic is a matter for individuals, for the few, and An insight are more important and end of the last century is that rituals is developed accordingly into a highly complicated pseudo-science. In early towards the ancient religions than are instructive for the understanding of the Greece, where the cult belongs in the communal, public sphere, the more is no longer seen in myths.’ With this recognition, antiquity importance of magic is correspondingly minimal.
    [Show full text]
  • What Would the World Be Without the Agon—The Agonistics of One Man
    What would the world be without the agon—the agonistics of one man against another—to show everyone the order of precedence among men, just as no two other things on earth are alike? How could any of us alive know quality if competition and personal combat did not let all the world know who embodies excellence and who merely manages mediocrity? —Odysseus, OLYMPOS Agon by John Harper Edited by Philip LaRose Additional edits and battle example by Wilhelm Fitzpatrick Illustrations by Thomas Hope from Costume of the Ancients, 1812 Cover photograph by Matthias Kabel, used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, version 2.5. Playtesters: Brandon Amancio, Scott Dierdorf, Tony Dowler, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick, Philip LaRose, Ed Ouellette, Cara Tyler. First Edition. August 2006. Printed by Lulu (www.lulu.com). Copyright ©2006 John Harper All rights reserved www.agon-rpg.com table of contents Part One: Introduction . 7 Part Two: Hero Creation . 19 Part Three: Contests . 32 Part Four: Battle . 43 Part Five: Abilities, Advancement, Fate, Oaths, Divine Favor & Interludes . 63 Part Six: Running the Game . 75 designer’s notes, inspirations, & thanks . .100 RECORD sheets . 102 greek names . 108 index . 114 reference tables . 116 part one introduction Remember, we hold the future of our children, our dear country, and our aged parents in our hands. Hellas depends on us. We can plunge her in grief; we can bring her glory. —ARGONAUTICA It’s nearly dusk and the heroes are as- he Olympian gods are at war among themselves. This war is played out upon sembled outside the cave of the gor- the stage of Earth, with mortals, beasts, and monsters as the foot-soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeschylus, Genealogy, History
    SHADOWS ON THE SON: AESCHYLUS, GENEALOGY, HISTORY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Richard Evan Rader Jr., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Anthony Kaldellis, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins _____________________________ Adviser Professor Bruce Heiden Greek and Latin Graduate Program ABSTRACT This dissertation examines genealogy and history in Prometheus Bound, Seven against Thebes, and Persians. It asks how a character‘s relation to his own family history affects his perspective on the past. I argue that in each play the conflict between a son and a father, say between Xerxes and Darius, is replicated at the level of a theory of history. Genealogy suggests two different relations between the past generations and the present, since it is both a reproduction of the same (the ideal son who takes after his father) and a production of difference (the son can never be identical to the father). These two genealogical relations correspond to two theories of history: what I identify as a retrospective view of history, which transfigures discrete historical events into teleology and inevitability, where history becomes the movement of necessity; and a prospective one, which sees historical events as only the trace of desire, hope, potential and human agency, where history becomes the movement of what could have been, the contingent unfolding of unlimited possibilities. In the Prometheus Bound, for example, Aeschylus stages the discord between Zeus and Prometheus as a conflict between two views on history: Prometheus leverages a secret about Zeus‘ sexual desire against him because he sees a necessity of repetition in Zeus‘ genealogical past; but Zeus, the play stresses, is fully capable of reason, compromise, and collaboration, and thus his future (unlike his predecessors‘) remains open to will, desire, and choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Agon and Homonoia: the Dynamics of Competition and Community in the Panhellenic Sanctuary
    COMPETITION AND COMMUNITY IN THE PANHELLENIC SANCTUARY AGON AND HOMONOIA: THE DYNAMICS OF COMPETITION AND COMMUNITY IN THE PANHELLENIC SANCTUARY By: SARAH -JANE EVANS, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofArts McMaster University © Copyright by Sarah-Jane Evans, September 2010 MASTER OF ARTS (2010) McMaster University (Classics) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Agon and Homonoia: The Dynamics of Competition and Community in the Panhellenic Sanctuary AUTHOR: Sarah-Jane Evans, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Sean Corner NUMBER OF PAGES: vi, 101 ii Abstract The aim of this thesis has been to explore agonism, and the relationship of individual and collective in Classical Greece, through the lens ofathletic competition at the panhellenic sanctuaries. This study moves beyond the presumed dichotomy of agon and homonoia upon which the standard view of agonism in modern scholarship has been predicated to explore the ways in which agonism functions precisely within and is structured by polis society, even as the polis must negotiate constantly between the interests of collective and individual. The evidence ofboth athlete and polis commemorations of athletic victory suggests a dynamic tension between promoting the self and remaining, and identifying oneself as, a member of a community. When appropriately channeled into civic benefaction and mutual advantage, agonism enables the self-interest ofthe individual to function within and remain structured by the polis; when it is not channeled in this way, it creates conflict and stasis. Just as in the relationship of athlete and polis, so too the interaction ofpoleis with each other in the panhellenic sanctuary reveals a tension between the desires for self-promotion and membership in the collective.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exam Study Guide
    If you can identify and explain the following terms and concepts, you will be in fantastic shape for the final exam! General knowledge of Greek literature and literacy Literature vs. writing - what is the difference; what and when was the earliest actual literature Importance of a literate Greek public and education – who could read Oral vs. written work Preservation of Greek literature – on what is Greek literature preserved, how much is preserved, who was involved in its preservation (role of Romans, role of library of Alexandria and which authors were associated with it), problems its limited preservation causes for classicists The major genres of literature Which genres were prose and which were poetry Which authors wrote in each genre General characteristics of each genre and progression from one to the next when applicable The major authors of Greek literature What are they known for writing? What are some aspects of their style? Generally when did they write (e.g. Archaic period vs. Hellenistic – not actual dates) Characteristics of groups of authors (e.g. female authors – who and what did they write, Homeric hymns, historians vs. chroniclers, Milesian philosophers, Pre-Socratic philosophers, etc.) Terminology: Poetic: What do these basic terms mean and to what type of literature do they pertain? dialect, meter, iambics, elegaics, invective, foot, lyric, choral lyric, monody, dithyramb, satyr play, rhapsode, Homeric Hymns, inherited conglomerate (aka The Blob), Epic Cycle, agon, arête, nemesis, hubris, subtext, foil, protagonist, antagonist, bucolic, metaphor, simile, dactylic hexameter, epigrams, poetry, prose, subject, theme, onomatopoeia Philosophical and Rhetorical: What do these basic terms mean and to whose work do they pertain? arche, relativism, sophistry and Sophistic Method, cosmology vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Universe and Inner Self in Early Indian and Early Greek Thought
    UNIVERSE AND INNER SELF IN EARLY INDIAN INDIAN AND INNER SELF IN EARLY UNIVERSE ‘The philosophical traditions of Greece and India are divergent but also GREEK THOUGHT AND EARLY show striking convergences. This book is an important and valuable contribution to the comparative study of the two ancient cultures. The various chapters are learned and sophisticated and considerably enrich our understanding of Greek and Indian philosophy.’ Phiroze Vasunia, University College London How can we explain the remarkable similarities between early Indian and early Greek philosophy? UNIVERSE AND Around the middle of the first millennium BCE there occurred a revolution in thought, with novel ideas such as that understanding the inner self is both vital for human well-being and central to understanding INNER SELF the universe. This intellectual transformation is sometimes called the beginning of philosophy. The revolution occurred in both India and Greece, but not in the vast Persian Empire that divided them. How was IN EARLY INDIAN this possible? This is a puzzle that has never been solved. This volume brings together Hellenists and Indologists representing AND EARLY GREEK a variety of perspectives on the similarities and differences between the two cultures, and on how to explain them. It offers a collaborative Richard Seaford Richard THOUGHT contribution to the burgeoning interest in the Axial Age, and is of interest to those intrigued by the big questions inspired by the ancient world. by Edited Richard Seaford is Emeritus Professor of Ancient Greek at the University of Exeter. Cover images: Detail from The School of Athens, 1511, Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino, Wikimedia Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and the Greek Idea of Immortality
    Nietzsche and the Greek Idea of Immortality Richard Avramenko University Wisconsin-Madison Department of Political Science Madison, WI 53706 Phone: (608) 263-2292 Fax: (608) 265-2663 E-mail: [email protected] *Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31-September 3, 2006. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. Nietzsche and the Greek Idea of Immortality § I. The Terrible Specter of Death: Natural Cowardice and the Will to Immortality In his Description of Greece, Pausanias recounts a legendary boxing match between Creugas of Epidamnus and Damoxenus of Syracuse at the ancient Nemean games. Because night was drawing near and a victor had yet to be declared, the judges decided to produce a klimax by ordering the athletes to exchange undefended blows until one of them yielded. The boxers agreed and Creugas was first. He struck Damoxenus in the head; Damoxenus withstood the blow and then bade Creugas lift up his arm. On his doing so, Damoxenus with straight fingers struck his opponent under the ribs; and with the sharpness of his nails and the violence of the blow his hand pierced his side, seized his bowels and dragged and tore them out. Creugas expired on the spot....1 The match was decided definitively — Creugas, or at least the corpse of Creugas, was recognized as the victor. Damoxenus was expelled from the stadium because, in dealing his opponent many blows instead of one, he had violated his mutual agreement. Beginning a discussion Nietzsche and the Greek idea of immortality with this archaic account of an even more archaic occurrence may appear somewhat strange.
    [Show full text]